williams something from nothing tcs 2015
Post on 13-Apr-2017
238 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Florida’s Mobility Fee Concept
Kristine M. Williams, AICPUniversity of South Florida, Center for Urban Transportation Research
Transportation and Communities Summit, Portland, OR Sept. 15, 2015
Cent
er fo
r Urb
an T
rans
port
atio
n Re
sear
ch/U
SF
Why a Mobility fee? • Funding shortfalls and issues with concurrency
• Based on roadway level of service (pm peak hour)• Available roadway capacity is free to new development• If no capacity available, development is stopped unless capacity
is provided – piecemeal mitigation• Encouraged sprawl
2
Cent
er fo
r Urb
an T
rans
port
atio
n Re
sear
ch/U
SF
Florida Community Renewal Act of 2009
A mobility fee to replace transportation concurrency management systems
The mobility fee should: provide for mobility needs ensure development mitigates its impacts proportionately be fairly distributed among the governmental entities
that maintain the impacted “roadways” promote compact, mixed-use, and energy-efficient
development3
Cent
er fo
r Urb
an T
rans
port
atio
n Re
sear
ch/U
SF
Approaches Considered
1. A road user fee paid by all roadway users and applied statewide
2. An impact fee sensitive to vehicle miles traveled3. A transportation utility fee assessed within an
established district based upon use of the utility
4
Cent
er fo
r Urb
an T
rans
port
atio
n Re
sear
ch/U
SF
What is the Mobility Fee?
• A transportation system charge to recoup the proportionate cost of transportation demand generated by allnew development.• Multimodal • Sensitive to VMT (location and type of
development)• System-wide application• Intergovernmental coordination
5
Regional tierstate highways, arterial corridors, regional transit, regional multiuse trails, system-wide operational enhancements (i.e., signal coordination), intermodal connections
Local tiercollectors, local transit, bicycle and pedestrian facilities
Cent
er fo
r Urb
an T
rans
port
atio
n Re
sear
ch/U
SF
Mobility Fee Needs a Mobility Plan
• Land use and transportation plans must be coordinated• Density and transit are linked
• Serve as cost basis for mobility fee• At minimum countywide
• Suggested: multi-county mobility plan• Cooperative agreements• Coordinated policies, incentives and project
priorities
6
Mobility fees are tied to land use and
transportation plans.
Cent
er fo
r Urb
an T
rans
port
atio
n Re
sear
ch/U
SF
Jacksonville 2030 Mobility PlanLA
ND
USE • 5 development
areas• Mobility-
friendly communities
TRAN
SPO
RTAT
ION
• Multimodal• Expanded
transit network• Bicycle-
pedestrian network
FUN
DIN
G
• Mobility fee • Mobility zones• Fee reduction
strategies•Net residential
density;•Mix of uses;•Transit service;•Ped/ bike
friendliness;•Affordable and
senior housing; and•Parking supply.
Mobility Plan Strategies7
Cent
er fo
r Urb
an T
rans
port
atio
n Re
sear
ch/U
SF
Jacksonville Mobility Fee
A = cost per VMT (constant)
B = average trip length per dev area
C = project daily vehicle trips
Cent
er fo
r Urb
an T
rans
port
atio
n Re
sear
ch/U
SF
Pasco County Mobility PlanMarket Area Map with Regional and Transit Nodes
9
Cent
er fo
r Urb
an T
rans
port
atio
n Re
sear
ch/U
SF
Pasco County Mobility Fee Example
10
UrbanOffice (50k sf) = $0
RuralOffice (50k sf) = $2,347
SuburbanOffice (50k sf) = $1,174
http://www.pascocountyfl.net/DocumentCenter/Home/View/330
Cent
er fo
r Urb
an T
rans
port
atio
n Re
sear
ch/U
SF
Pasco County Mobility PlanLA
ND
USE
•Urban service area/TCEA•Market areas•TOD overlay, town centers, employment centers•Transfer of development rights
TRAN
SPO
RTAT
ION • MPO 2035 LRTP
(road, transit, bike/ped)
• Transit emphasis corridor FUN
DIN
G • Tiered mobility fee assessment districts
• Rate “buy-down”: TIF, gas tax, sales tax
Mobility Plan Strategies 11
Cent
er fo
r Urb
an T
rans
port
atio
n Re
sear
ch/U
SF
Adapted Transportation Utility Fee
12
𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 𝑈𝑈𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑈𝑈𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑈𝑈 𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹 =(𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏𝐹𝐹𝑇𝑇𝐹𝐹𝑏𝑏 𝑐𝑐𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑈𝑈 + 𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝐹𝐹𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑏𝑏 𝑐𝑐𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇)𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝑏𝑏𝐹𝐹𝑇𝑇𝐹𝐹𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝐹𝐹𝑏𝑏 𝑏𝑏𝑈𝑈 𝐹𝐹𝑒𝑒𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑏𝑏 𝑏𝑏𝑇𝑇𝐹𝐹𝑇𝑇
• VMT aligned with tax assessor records (not ITE LU codes)• VMT estimated by assessor codes per sq ft and multiplied by
structure size or by # of bedrooms• Alternative:
• functional population – the effective population served over a day including those who live and work in the area
As conceived by Arthur “Chris” Nelson and James Nicholas
For Further InformationKristine M. Williams, AICPkwilliams@cutr.usf.edu813-974-9807www.cutr.usf.edu
Florida Mobility Fee Study Final Report, June 2009http://www.cutr.usf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/2009-06FloridaMobilityFeeStudyFinal.pdf
Alternative Funding for Mobility in Florida, 2012http://purl.umn.edu/207092
13
top related