using assessment to nurture critical thinking pdf...using assessment to nurture critical thinking...

Post on 20-Apr-2018

222 Views

Category:

Documents

6 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Using Assessment to Nurture Critical Thinking

Helping students to engage in critical,

creative and collaborative inquiry

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_zD3NxSsD8

Powerful assessmentsadapted from Geoff Scott

• Presents students with “real world” challenges that require them to apply what they know in unique, problematic situations

• Have no clear solutions (Present dilemmas that need a resolution)

• Involve sub-problems to arrive at a sound solution

• Assess for deep understanding and competence

The case for thinking at the core of learning

•“Although thinking is innate, skillful thinking must be cultivated”

Art Costa, 2008

“Students who passively receive information are far less likely to understand what they have

heard or read about than are students who have critically scrutinized, interpreted, applied or

tested this information.”

Roland Case, 2005

“Any subject—be it physics, art, or auto repair—can promote critical thinking as long as

teachers teach in intellectually challenging ways.”

Nel Noddings, 2008

Application

Synthesis

Analysis

Evaluation

Comprehension

Knowledge

From “knowledge hierarchies” to “knowledge networks”

Critical thinking explored and defined

Critical thinking - valued but misunderstood?

In a 1997 study of 66 post-secondary institutions in California, Richard Paul

found:

• 89% of faculty viewed critical thinking as a primary educational objective, yet only

19% could clearly explain its meaning

• 78% of faculty acknowledged students’ lack of appropriate criteria to assess their

thinking, yet only 8% could enumerate any intellectual criteria required of their

students

• 82% of faculty involved students in critical thinking at least once per class, but only

15% required this in writing

• 77% of faculty had little of no conception of how to reconcile content coverage with

the fostering of critical thinking

Creating thinking classrooms

A thinking classroom…is a classroom where students learn to

think and think to learn: thinking is the way to engage with and deepen students’

understanding of the subject matter of the curriculum.

Competence vs skills

• Possessing an array of skills does not necessarily make someone a competent scientist, health care provider or teacher

• Being competent in a field allows students to be both job ready and beyond

• Note: Thinking both critical thinking and creativity are competences not skills

Being competent refers to being able to perform a

constellation of challenging core tasks across a range of

contexts and fields.

London, Ontario 1950

South East corner of Dundas and Richmond

When is someone thinking critically?

• A person is thinking critically only if she is attempting to assess or judge the merits of possible options in light ofrelevant factors or criteria.

•Critical thinking is criterial thinking— thinking in the face of criteria.

A definition of critical thinking

TC2 defines critical thinking as the thinking through of a problematic situation about what to believe or how to act where the thinker makes a reasoned judgment that reflects competent use

of the intellectual tools for quality thinking.

Framing questions and tasks that invite critical thinking

Three Types of Questions

Type 1Type 2 Type 3

What are the ingredients in

Bertie Bott’s Every Flavor

Beans?

What is your favourite

flavour of Bertie Bott’s

Every Flavour Beans?

Should Bertie Bott’s Every

Flavour Beans be sold in school

cafeterias?

What are three activities in

Berlin?

Would you like to move to

Berlin?

Would your family’s needs be

better met in Berlin or London?

Identify several natural

disasters that impact on the

environment?

Which natural disaster

creates the most fear for

you?

Which natural disaster poses the

great threat to Ontario’s

economy?

List three types of exercise. What is your favourite type

of exercise?

Which sport would best meet

the needs of someone with

asthma – diving, soccer or

tennis?

Is Hamlet a sympathetic character in your eyes?

Which of the theories used by scientists to explain the dinosaurs

disappearance from the face of the earth is the most plausible?

What are three methods of harvesting trees?

Six prompts for framing critical thinking opportunities

Concept Attainment• Compare the two sets of terms – how are they

similar/different? • What characteristics do the YES examples possess

that make them like terms?

In June 1775, British troops attacked

American forces defending Bunker Hill,

the heights overlooking the city of Boston.

The heroic stand of American patriots in

battle inspired the colonists in their struggle

for independence.

From Unit 1: An Age of Revolution in

Patterns of Civilization vol. 2

What is the dominant perspective

represented by this picture and caption?

Where do you draw the line on hunger?

At what point is the absence of food a

human rights violation?

Using powerful assessments to inspire awe and wonder

Criteria for Powerful Assessments

1. Authentic (framed around a “real world” challenge)2. Assesses for deep understanding and competence3. Engages emotions (involves both a technical and a human

element)4. No clear solution (Engages critical, creative and collaborative

thinking as students construct a sound response)5. Cascade from a rich inquiry (involves sub-problems that help

to develop a sound response to the over-arching challenge)

Criteria: Assess for deep understanding and competence

Practices:a) Focus on conceptual understandingb) Provide rich challenges that require complex responses

(drawing on various discipline related skills that c) Require application of ideas, concepts and procedures to

authentic context that show d) Use authentic examples to initiate the inquiry

Teaching for deep understanding by focusing on the intellectual tools for

quality thinking

Problematize

everything!

Make thinking

routine.

Encourage “failing forward” by making revisions an expectation

Assessment rich learning recognizes that nurturing the habits of good thinkers requires that students are expected to revise and edit their work based on helpful critiques provided by the teacher, their peers or their own self-reflection.

Offer alternatives to consider rather than showing how to make a

correction

For students to see the feedback they receive as helpful

guidance it should be provided in the form of guiding

comments or questions and when appropriate should offer

alternatives for the student to consider. Offering students 3-4

options to consider for revision can help get them unstuck

without providing the answer thus contributing to nurturing

thinking rather than undermining their thinking.

Promote use of criteria when

considering an issue as well as in

creating a response

Helping students to understand the criteria that defines a

quality response to a challenge can help to focus both peer

and self assessment.

Descriptive Qualitative

Research notes are 4-5 pages in length

and draw upon 3-4 sources

Research notes are comprehensive and

reflect a variety of perspectives

Bibliography contains 8-10 sources

Bibliography is comprised of a variety of

relevant and reliable source providing

multiple perspectives

Essay contains three arguments with

supporting evidence

Essay thesis is supported by the use of

sufficient arguments that are convincing,

relevant and insightful

The title page includes a title, name,

course and date

The title page is informative and visually

appealing

Poster includes 3 visuals, titles and a 30-

word caption

Poster is visually appealing, informative

and convincing or provocative.

To critically assess the strength of the

studies by Reich L et. al. (2012) in support

of equal cross modal potential and Lewis L

et. al. (2010) in support of different cross

modal connectivity, it is important to

consider the scope of these studies, the

quality of the experimental methods used

and the consistency of experimental results

across various tasks.

To critically assess the strength of the

studies by Reich L et. al. (2012) in support

of equal cross modal potential and Lewis L

et. al. (2010) in support of different cross

modal connectivity, it is important to

consider the scope of these studies, the

quality of the experimental methods

used and the consistency of

experimental results across various

tasks.

top related