us module production
Post on 06-Jan-2016
29 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
US Module Production
Prof. J. Incandela
US CMS Tracker Project Leader
For the US CMS Tracker Group
Tracker Meetings - CERN
Feb. 13, 2004
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 2
US Responsibility
5.4 m
2.4
m
Outer Barrel (TOB)
End Caps (TEC)
Up to 2000 TEC Modules for rings at large radii
and hybrid processing for all Rings
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 3
Current Status
• Module production lines at >90% preparedness• Final equipment & personnel now falling into place as per our plan
to upgrade capacity to 15 modules per day per site.• Both sites have recently obtained or achieved the following
• 4 hybrid test stands• Fully automated wirebonding• Automated surveys of modules on gantry plates with OGP• Roughly adequate module test and burn-in equipment• Skilled manpower
• Rod assembly, testing and LT test• Also here final pieces are coming together
• Both sites have recently obtained • Assembly tools and fixtures (From CERN and UCSB)• Single-rod test boxes• Rochester boxes (8 rod LT)
• Adequate power supplies/cables to make one stand fully functional (some to be shipped to us this week).
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 4
US Group
• Fermilab (FNAL)• M. Demarteau, M. Hrycyk, A. Ronzhin, K. Sogut, L. Spiegel, S. Tkaczyk
+ 5 tech.• Kansas State University (KSU) Pixels (but W. Kahl will still pitch in)• University of California, Riverside (UCR)
• Gail Hanson, Gabriella Pasztor, Patrick Gartung• University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB)
• A. Affolder, S. Burke, C.Campagnari, D. Hale, (C. Hill), J.Incandela, S. Kyre, J. Lamb, S. Stromberg, (D. Stuart), R. Taylor, D. White + 7 tech.
• University of Illinois, Chicago (UIC)• E. Chabalina, C. Gerber, T. Timour
• University of Kansas (KU)• P. Baringer, A. Bean, L. Christofek, X. Zhao
• University of Rochester (UR)• R.Demina, R. Eusebi, E. Halkiadakis, A. Hocker, S.Korjenevski,
P. Tipton• Mexico:3 institutes led by Cinvestav Cuidad de Mexico• 1-2 more groups are in the process of joining us
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 5
Hybrid Wire Bonding/Thermal Cycling
•UCSB stand fully commissioned 28/d without difficulty
• 80 hybrids bonded and thermal cycled
• 4 PLL failures -20C• 2 APV failures• Several with opens
•FNAL stand complete and shipped from UCSB
• Received yesterday• Operational by end of Feb.
•Mexico City box under construction
• Ready ~ April
SetSet--up in Clean Roomup in Clean Room
SetSet--up in Clean Roomup in Clean Room
ChillerChiller
Cold BoxCold Box
PC for MonitoringPC for Monitoring+ Controlling+ Controlling
ElectronicsElectronics
Gas/Water Flow ControlGas/Water Flow Control
Nominal capacity = 84 hybrids per day, but hope to distribute loadto Mexico City in order to free up resources at module production centers
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 6
Vienna Boxes
•Fully operational @ both sites• 10 modules for 10(14) hours
with 1(2) thermal cycles
• PedRun, CalRun, IVRun.
• 2 grad. students and 2 technicians trained in operation of box
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 7
Demonstrating High Rates
• Plan• Sustain our targeted steady-state rate for 2 weeks at each site
• Firmly demonstrate new peak capacity of 15 modules/day.• Determine if module fabrication and testing capabilities are truly
adequate or need more tuning• Build many modules starting w/the best STM sensors
• Plan agreed upon at December CMS week• See if there exist subgroup of acceptable sensors
• Schedule for 2 week production runs of 150 modules• UCSB: January 26 to February 9 – completed• FNAL: February 23 to March 8 – in preparation
• UCSB Results• Met production and testing targets without difficulty• Very low rate of introduced failures seen• But no change in the rate of occurrence of modules with CMN
• Did not depend on production period or sensor grading• No sub-classifications of STM sensors appear to be immune
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 8
TOB Module Production
5 TOB rassembly plates, each with 3 new modules curing under vacuum.
UCSB Gantry Team at work
Full plate survey on OGP
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 9
UCSB 150 Modules Run: Mechanical Precision (1)
Delta Sili1X3 Sili2X1
Sili1 Sili2 AngleArrows current specifications
150 module production run: 10d period @ 15 modules/day
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 10
UCSB 150 Modules Run: Mechanical Precision (2)
Sili1 to Frame Angle
Sili2 to Frame Angle
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 11
UCSB 150 Modules Run: Mechanical Precision (3)
Hybrid Y2-Y2nom
Delta Sili1X1 HybridX1
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 12
UCSB 150 Module Run: Gantry
• 8 modules flagged out of 150.• Only 3 are at all serious; all 3 correspond to the same plate and position
Module # Problem Location
5061 Hybrid Y2-Y2nom = 245um Plate 4, position 1
5072 Sili1/Sili2 angle = 11 mdeg Plate 4, position 2
5075 Sili1/Sili2 angle = 11 mdeg Plate 2, position 1
5091 Sili1/Sili2 angle = 14 mdeg Plate 2, position 2
5092 Sili1/Sili2 Angle = 20 mdeg
Sili2 frame angle = 12 mdeg
Plate 2, position 2
5153 Sili2 frame angle = 11 mdeg
Sili2 X3-X3nom = 32 um
Plate 1, position 1
5162 Sili1/Sili2 angle = 17 mdeg Plate 2, position 2
5165 Hybrid Y2-Y2nom = 221um Plate 4, position 1
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 13
Gantry Lessons
• Fine-tuning• 10 modules/position/plate under stable operating conditions
• May adjust plates (e.g. plate 2, position 2)
• Can adopt additional corrections
• U-rotation corrections
• Updated X and Y corrections
• Hybrid positioning
• Add 0.5 mm thick silicon rubber to feet of hybrid tools to eliminate slipping in placement (demonstrated for one tool in this exercise)
• Timing experience• After-cure surveying of 15 modules and production of 15 new modules
(5 plates) usually accomplished in 6 hours if no problems encountered.
• Provides 2 hours contingency per day for problems, cleanup, preparation, adjustments, etc.
• A sustainable rate for 2 technicians per 8 hour day
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 14
Preparations for Main Production
• 10 assembly plates are in design or construction*• 2 TOB R-phi plates + 2 TOB stereo plates + 2 TEC R6 plates
• Parts being machined will be delivered by end of February.
• Will result in totals of 7 + 3 + 3 respectively
(We’ve built 7 R6 modules – generally good quality, 1 has CMN)
• 2 TEC R5N plates
• Designs nearing completion.
• Plan to make 1st modules in March
• 2 TEC R5S (stereo)
• Designs underway
*Based on TPO meeting discussion, may alter quantities
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 15
UCSB 150 Module Run:Wirebonding
• One technician, working alone, kept pace with module assembly
• 150 TOB modules fully bonded in 10 days
• More than 50 Hybrids bonded in the same period
• A streak of more than 100,000 wires without a single failure
• Lessons• Use up a 100 m spool of wire
every 2 days
• purchasing 750 m spools
• New bonding tool every week
•Plans• K&S 8060 backup bonder
arrives this month
FNAL 8090’s (3)
UCSB 8090
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 16
UCSB 150 Module Run: Testing
•Must keep up with fabrication• Sensor selection
• Vienna grading (A+,A,B)
• Both sensors same grade
•Complete set of tests:• ARCS quick test
• Vienna Box
• 1 thermal cycle (~7 hours)
• LED tests
•Lessons:• We can comfortably maintain a
test rate of 15 module/day
• Wien box preventive maintenance may be required
112 modules understorage
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 17
UCSB Module Quality:Preliminary Results
•150 modules tested
•Failure rates/sources (excluding CMN modules)
• 0.53% Bad channels on average
• 0.29% Known bad channels
• 0.20% Unmarked bad channels
• 0.032% open hybrid-APV
• 0.002% module bonding
• 0.035% bad channels introduced during assembly/bonding
• Vast majority of introduced failures were on pitch adaptors
•101+ modules so far have undergone 8-12 hours in Vienna box with a single thermal cycle
• Module Grades• 126 Grade A• 10 Grade B• 10 Grade F
• 11 CMN modules• 1 AFTER THERMAL CYCLE
• 1 doesn’t operate at -20 C• Tested in 3 different
Vienna box slots• 2 missing Al strip metal (over
etched, not a scratch)• 12 mid-sensor opens in Al• 19 mid-sensor opens in Al
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 18
CMN modules and sensor grading
•Sensors graded using Vienna grading rules• All sensors were re-probed prior to assembly
•Sensors sub-divided into three time periods• Prior to Week 39, 2002 (Pre-production)• Week 39, 2002-Week 12, 2003 (Production improvements being implemented)• After Week 13, 2003 (Final Production)
•11 Common mode modules found• 1 after thermal cycling
•No significant difference between A+ and A sensors or year of fabrication• CMN rate in grade B modules may be higher than grade A+/A
Sensor 2001-2 2002-3 2003 Total
Grade # CMN % # CMN % # CMN % # CMN %
GRADE A+ 32 1 3.1% 4 1 25.0% 12 0 0.0% 48 2 4.2%
GRADE A 42 2 4.8% 11 1 9.1% 16 1 6.3% 69 4 5.8%
GRADE B 22 3 13.6% 10 2 20.0% 1 0 0.0% 33 5 15%
Total 96 6 6.2% 25 4 16% 29 1 3.4% 150 11 7.3%
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 19
5018 (built 29-1-04)
•Sensors• 31215017
• 31215005
•Channels• 420 at 150 V
30200020005018
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
0 100 200 300 400 500
Voltage
Bia
s C
urr
en
t (n
A)
Current(DB)
Current(probing)
Current(Bonded)
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 20
5019 (built 2-2-04)
•Sensors• 23863925
• 14845906
•Channels• 158 at 300 V
30200020005019
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0 100 200 300 400 500
Voltage
Bia
s C
urre
nt (n
A)
Current(DB)
Current(probing)
Current(Bonded)
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 21
5021
•Sensors• 24104901
• 20825302
•Channels• 122 at 300 V
30200020005021
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
0 100 200 300 400 500
Voltage
Bia
s C
urr
en
t (n
A)
Current(DB)
Current(probing)
Current(Bonded)
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 22
5081
•Sensors• 23974205
• 23974314
•Channels• 20 at 300 V
30200020005081
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0 100 200 300 400 500
Voltage
Bia
s C
urr
en
t (n
A)
Current(DB)
Current(probing)
Current(Bonded)
Intermittent and can decay away
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 23
5103
•Sensors• 15061804
• 23860212
•Channels• 270-331 at 40 V
30200020005103
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
0 100 200 300 400 500
Voltage
Bia
s C
urr
en
t (n
A)
Current(DB)
Current(probing)
Current(Bonded)
Not the usualsymptoms …
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 24
•Sensors
• 20275916
• 14739511
•Channels
• 43 at 320 V
• 405 at 250V
30200020005155
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 100 200 300 400 500
Voltage
Bia
s C
urr
en
t (n
A)
Current(DB)
Current(probing)
Current(Bonded)
5155
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 25
Re-probing Results
I > 5 AI > 1.5 A
Can we rule out time evolution ? Consider a simple evolutionary model*: Exponential decay with a fraction F of all sensors changing such that the population with I > 5 A grows as F(1 – exp(-t/))…
*Exercise proposed in a discussion with Guido, Tony, Regina and Joe - Dec. ‘03
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 26
Fits
• Considered various susceptible sub-population fractions F from 0 to 100% and fit for best time constant
• Low values of F yield poor fit
• High values of F yield a decent fit. Best fit occurs for F = 100% as seen at right with an essentially flat growth over time
This proves nothing about this model
This kind of exercise could only be used to rule out models, not confirm them…this model is not ruled out but we sincerely hope that this is not the real situation.
dofÿ2
< 1
Extrapolating over 10 years 32% sensors causing CMN 54% of modules
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 27
Module Time Degradation- Module 689
•After 3 months on shelf, FNAL module retested
• A second chip now has a high noise channel causing CMN
• Channel previously only had a slightly higher noise
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 28
•After assembly module was tested (09/08) on ARCS at 400 V and graded “B” (6 faulty channels). No problems observed.
Module Time Degradation-705
•After LT, one chip shows CMN
•Similar case among 150 UCSB modules recently completed. (not shown among previous plots - data after Wien box not web accessible – will include in note under preparation)
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 29
After sitting on shelf for more than 3 months, module re-tested to find a new pinhole
Module Time Degradation-705 II
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 30
Rods
• Recent Efforts• Completed the single rod test
stands for UCSB and FNAL
• CERN completed rotisserie and rod handling fixtures
• UCSB completed module installation tools for US and CERN
• LT definition of tests and test methods still must be refined
• Production• So far have built 3 SS rods
• All 3 built in under 2 hours
• Will build and test 688 rods (+spares)
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 31
Rochester LT Stands
The hardware and software are essentially completed for the box.
Multi-rod Software still needs to be developed
The commissioning of the burn-in stands is proceeding well, in advance or production ramp-up
We await full complement of cables and power supplies
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 32
Summary & Conclusions
• US rapidly approaching full production capability• Almost all equipment in place
• New higher rate demonstrated w/good quality at UCSB:
• Will review residual problems and try to improve procedures, accuracy, quality and efficiency…
• FNAL to do similar high rate exercise starting in 2 weeks
• Results for modules with STM sensors • New CMN modules
• Data do not discount possible deterioration over time
• Retested modules @FNAL show further degradation
• As stated in September 2003 when I first reported this problem - a good understanding is needed.
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 33
5048
•Sensors• 24102009
• 24102007
•Channels• 382 at 250 V
30200020005048
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
0 100 200 300 400 500
Voltage
Bia
s C
urr
en
t (n
A)
Current(DB)
Current(probing)
Current(Bonded)
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 34
5063
•Sensors• 31215004
• 31215007
•Channels• 170 at 250 V
30200020005063
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
0 100 200 300 400 500
Voltage
Bia
s C
urr
en
t (n
A)
Current(DB)
Current(probing)
Current(Bonded)
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 35
5119
•Sensors• 24104723
• 23974320
•Channels• 441 at 350 V
30200020005119
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
0 100 200 300 400 500
Voltage
Bia
s C
urr
en
t (n
A)
Current(DB)
Current(probing)
Current(Bonded)
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 36
•Sensors
• 23974311
• 15061419
•Channels
• 48 at 310 V
30200020005140
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 100 200 300 400 500
Voltage
Bia
s C
urr
en
t (n
A)
Current(DB)
Current(probing)
Current(Bonded)
5140
US Production – CERN - Feb. 13, 2004 - J. Incandela 37
Fits (low F)
• Considered various susceptible sub-population fractions F from 0 to 100% and fit for best time constant
• Low values of F yield poorest fits as seen for F = 5% at right
dofÿ2
> 2
Extrapolating over 10 years:
top related