uncertainty of climate change impact on the flow ... · - hydrological system aqualog - statistical...

Post on 27-Mar-2020

6 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Uncertainty of Climate Change Impact Uncertainty of Climate Change Impact on on the Flow Characteristicsthe Flow Characteristics

(Tepl(Tepláá Vltava Vltava RiverRiver))

Jan Daňhelka

Czech Hydrometeorological Institute

e-mail: danhelka@chmi.cz

12th Magdeburg Seminar

Český Krumlov, 10th to 13th October 2006

• Climate change uncertainty

• Methods of modeling

• Results

• Medium range modelling

• Conclusion

OUTLINE

Arnell et al. (1999)

Kašpárek in Kalvová et al. (2002)

GCM

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN

rela

tive

chan

ge o

f mon

thly

pre

cipi

tatio

n

A2 50 A2 80 B2 50 B2 80

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN

abso

lute

cha

nge

of m

ean

mon

thly

tem

pera

ture

[°C]

A2 50 A2 80 B2 50 B2 80

Study catchment

- Hadley high and low scenario for 2050

- LARS-WG - 50y daily time series (MAP, Tmax, Tmin)

- Different duration of wet and dry spells (max 10 % change)

- Different reference period

- 1961 - 1990

- 1961 - 2003

- 100 random sets

- Hydrological system AquaLog

- Statistical evaluation

Methods

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000

accumulted observed precipitation [mm]

accumulated simulated precipitation [mm]

LARS-WG

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

Temperature [°C]

Observed Tmin Simulated Tmin Difference (OBS-SIM)

LARS-WG

0

5

10

15

20

25N

OV-

65

DEC

-65

JAN

-66

FEB-

66

MAR

-66

APR

-66

MAY

-66

JUN

-66

JUL-

66

AUG

-66

SEP-

66

OC

T-66

Dai

ly fl

ow [m

3 .s-1

]

Observed Simulated

Hydrological model - AquaLog

RESULTS

1000

1020

1040

1060

0 1a 1b 2a 2b 3a 3b 4a 4b

prec

ipita

tion

[mm

]

0

1

2

3

4

0 1a 1b 2a 2b 3a 3b 4a 4b

Ave

rage

Tm

in [°

C]

Annual peakflow occurrence

Flood return period

355 d.p.

1.4

1.5

1.6

1.7

1.8

1.9

2

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

exceedance (%)

m3 .s

-1

Recent climate

High climate change scenario

1961-90 1961-2003

Low flows

Coclusion

- uncertainty modeling of climate change impact is necessary(deterministic modeling could lead to wrong results)

- flow exceedance curves are going to change

- mainly low flows simulation shows the need for probability approach

- Flood season - more summer dominance (more research needed)

Thank You for Your Attention

Jan Daňhelka

Czech Hydrometeorological Institute

danhelka@chmi.cz

hydro.chmi.cz/ihc_ips4

top related