tom wilson, department of geology and geography environmental and exploration geophysics ii...

Post on 19-Jan-2018

224 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Reflection events in the shot record are completely different from those in the stack section

TRANSCRIPT

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II

tom.h.wilsontom.wilson@mail.wvu.edu

Department of Geology and GeographyWest Virginia University

Morgantown, WV

Time-distance Time-distance relationshipsrelationshipsRay-tracingRay-tracing

Don’t forget to visit the web site for slides and other info -http://www.geo.wvu.edu/~wilson/geol554/lect3/lec3.pdf

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

Different travel paths

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

Reflection events in the shot record are completely different from those in the stack section

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

Reflection time distance curve in basic hyperbolic form

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

Some basic math for general perspective

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

Location of the apex in time

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

As time goes by reflection events approach start to come in linearly with time. They approach the asymtotes of the hyperbola

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

The direct arrival has the relationship of an asymptote to the arrival times of the reflection event.

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

21

21

21

22 4

Vh

Vxt From the basic time-distance relationship

1

12

1

212 2or 4

Vht

Vht When x = 0, which is the time intercept.

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

121

22 or

Vxt

Vxt

When x becomes very large with respect to the thickness of the reflecting layer, the x2/V2 term

becomes much larger than the 4h2/V2 term so that

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

When we bang on the ground, the Earth speaks back in a variety of ways

This time-distance record shows everything coming in with different shapes, sometimes almost at the same time and sometimes earlier, sometimes later. A real

mess!

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

The shot record does not portray subsurface structure The differences in travel times are associated with differences in source receiver offset

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

The geology of the area is nearly flat lying

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

The single layer refraction time-distance relationship - but first -

1 1 2 2 sin sinwhere n is the index of refraction

velocity of light in vacuumvelocity of light in medium

n n

cnv

Snell’s law

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

The c’s cancel out and we have ...

1 1 2 2 1 21 2

sin sin ; sin sinc cn nV V

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

One of our assumptions -

Assume V1 < V2 < V3

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

because sin(/2) = 1

11 2

2

sin sinVV

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

Critical Refraction

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

With the direct arrival and the single layer reflection we travel from point A to B with constant velocity

The critical refraction problem is still a simple distance over velocity function, but the velocity changes on us.

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

V1

V2

Isolating travel paths based on velocity

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

The slant path length

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

The path along the interface

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

Sum them together

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

Variables and constants

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and GeographyDirect Arrival

2

1

Which of the two lines have the correct relationship of the critical refraction to the direct arrival?

time

x – source receiver offset distance

Trig simplifications

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

Basic properties of the critical refraction

c

sin()1

21 sin

c

V1

2 22 1V V

V2

sin()=V1/V2

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

11

2 1 2

2 tan2cos

c

c

hhxtV V V

Trig transformations

The critical or minimum refraction distance

c

xmin

The refraction time-intercept

The single layer refraction

Skip to 39

h1

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

Trig functions and velocity ratios

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

Snell's law gives us an easy way to look trig functions in the critical triangle

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

Going through the algebraic substitution the constants in our earlier expression are represented in terms of velocity instead of critical angle.

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

The critical or minimum distance

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

Determining the critical distance

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

Putting all these events together in the time-distance plot reveals useful information content in the shot record.

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

Basic time-distance relationships for the refracted wave - Single horizontal interface

1) straight line 2) Refraction and reflection arrivals coincide at one offset (xcross).3) Refraction arrivals follow a straight line with 4) slope 1/V2, where 5) 1/V2 is less than 1/V1

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

Questions about the shot record

Given that the geophone interval is 10 feet determine the velocities of events A, B and C

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

Density range 2 to 3; Y, 0.12 to 1.1 (x1011N/m2);, 0.04 to 0.3. Which have the greatest influence on Vp. Use Table 1 (see H:Drive also see table linked on

class web page) to help you assess this problem.

(1 )(1 2 )(1 )p

EV

Problem 2.6

• How will you handle this problem ?

Get together in groups and talk about this. Describe your approach and hand in. 2.6 will be due next Monday and should – from here

out – be worked independently.

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography

For next time

• Continue your reading of Chapter 2, pages 65 -77 (Chapter 3) and pages 149 - 164 (Chapter 4).

• Hand in problems 2.3 and 2.6 (next Monday)

• Look over problems 2.7, 2.12 for Monday

• Look over the absorption problem handed out today.

• Bring your questions to class next Monday.

top related