timing of volunteer corn control affects sugarbeet yield · timing of volunteer corn control...

Timing of Volunteer Corn Control Affects Sugarbeet YieldAmanda C. Harden and Christy L. Sprague

Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences

Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI

Results and Discussion

Field research conducted at two locations in 2012 & 2013

MSU Agronomy Farm, East Lansing, MI

SVREC, Richville, MI

RCB design with factorial arrangement, 4 replications

Sugarbeet seed: ‘HM 173 RR’ planted in 76 cm rows at 124,000 seeds ha-1

Planting dates:

East Lansing: April 12, 2012 & May 3, 2013

Richville: April 4, 2012 & May 2, 2013

‘F2’ glyphosate-resistant volunteer corn planted at 17,220 plants ha-1 (1.7 plants m-2), 13 cm off sugarbeet row

Herbicide treatments are listed in Table 1

Removal timing clethodima quizalofopab

V2 corn 105 g ha-1 28 g ha-1

V4 corn 105 g ha-1 28 g ha-1

V6 corn 158 g ha-1 35 g ha-1

V8 corn 158 g ha-1 35 g ha-1

V10 corn 210 g ha-1 56 g ha-1

a Glyphosate 0.84 kg ha-1 + AMS 2% w/wb Non-ionic surfactant 0.125% v/v

Table 1. Herbicide rates and application timings

Materials and Methods

Clethodim and quizalofop were equally effective forvolunteer corn control, so results were combined overherbicides (Table 2).

Volunteer corn was most effectively controlled when itwas treated at the V2, V4, or V6 growth stages.Volunteer corn control of applications made to V8corn ranged from 71 to 91%, and volunteer corn wasnot effectively controlled with applications to V10 corn(Table 2, Fig. 1).

Data are presented separately by year and locationdue to interactions.

Sugarbeet yield and RWSha were not impacted byvolunteer corn at Richville in 2012. This may be due tominimal early-season precipitation that resulted inlimited corn growth (data not shown).

At East Lansing in 2012, if volunteer corn wascontrolled at any time (V2-V10) sugarbeet yield andRWSha was equivalent or higher than the no volunteercorn control. Only volunteer corn that was notcontrolled caused reductions (Table 3).

At East Lansing in 2013, yield was reduced 13% whenvolunteer corn was not controlled and reductions inRWSha started at the V8 application timing comparedwith the no corn control (Table 3).

The greatest reduction in sugarbeet yield and RWShadue to volunteer corn time of control occurred atRichville in 2013 (Table 3). Yield and RWSha wasreduced starting at the V4 application timingcompared with the no volunteer corn control withreductions of 10 and 11%, respectively. Yields andRWSha were even further reduced if herbicideapplications did not occur until V10 corn.

Clethodim and quizalofop should be used for control of glyphosate-resistantvolunteer corn in sugarbeet.

While there was some variability in yield loss due to volunteer corn, applicationsprior to V4 corn were able to maximize sugarbeet yield and recoverable whitesucrose.

Conclusions

Removal time East Lansing Richville

Corn stage 2012 2013 2012 2013

V2 99 A 99 A 99 A 99 A

V4 98 A 99 A 98 A 99 A

V6 98 A 97 A 95 B 99 A

V8 91 B 71 B 82 C 91 B

V10 73 C 43 C 76 D 39 C

Table 2. Volunteer corn control (2 WAT).

Removal time East Lansing Richville

Corn stage

2012 2013 2013

Yield (Mg ha-1)

RWSha(kg ha-1)

Yield(Mg ha-1)

RWSha(kg ha-1)

Yield(Mg ha-1)

RWSha(kg ha-1)

No corn 48.0 B 6355 B 70.9 A 9493 A 49.0 A 7542 A

V2 49.1 B 6477 B 68.5 A 8656 ABC 45.4 AB 6796 AB

V4 50.7 AB 6841 AB 68.4 A 8853 AB 44.3 B 6738 B

V6 54.9 A 7496 A 68.2 A 8862 AB 43.5 B 6701 B

V8 46.6 B 6229 B 65.1 AB 8382 BC 43.2 B 6585 B

V10 48.4 AB 6724 B 64.3 AB 8266 BC 32.2 C 4927 C

Untreated 34.3 C 4665 C 61.4 B 7838 C 30.6 C 4599 C

Table 3. Effect of herbicide application timings on sugarbeet yield and RWSha at East Lansing and Richville.

Introduction

Volunteer glyphosate-resistant corn is a frequent weedproblem in glyphosate-resistant sugarbeet grown inMichigan.

Without appropriate management volunteer corn can causereductions in sugarbeet yield and quality.

Identify the optimal time for control of volunteerglyphosate-resistant corn in glyphosate-resistantsugarbeet.

Evaluate two herbicide options for management ofvolunteer corn in glyphosate-resistant sugarbeet.

Acknowledgements

Objectives

Plots kept weed free with glyphosate (0.84 kg a.e. ha-1)

Measurements:

Volunteer corn control

Volunteer corn biomass (prior to harvest)

Sugarbeet yield

Recoverable white sucrose per hectare (RWSha)

Analyzed with PROC MIXED in SAS

Interactions tested

Means separated with Fisher’s Protected LSD at p < 0.05

Volunteer corn control

Volunteer corn biomass (prior to harvest)

Sugarbeet yield

Recoverable white sucrose per hectare (RWSha)

Figure 1. Volunteer corn uncontrolled (left) and 2weeks after V10 removal application (right).