the georgia initiative
Post on 23-Feb-2016
43 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
The Georgia Initiative
GDOT/GUCC Clear Roadside Program
Clear Roadside
• Tom Jackson• Vice President
Purpose of Presentation
• To Heighten the awareness of the importance of proper pole (and other utility structures) placements on or adjacent to public right-of-way.
What more can be Done?
• Over 40 fatal crashes in 1997– Where did these happen?– Why did these happen?
Fatal crash review> Examine the crashes closer
> Determine actual pole location
> Estimate influencing factors
> Can these factors be changed?
43 Fatal Crashes in 1997
• Sequence of events from:– GDOT Database information– Police report– Field Inspection– Pictures
Utility Pole Fatal CrashesData Percentage
(%)Alcohol Involved(*potentially)
53(*84)
No Seatbelt 78
Male Driver 76
Typical Utility Pole Crash
• Majority involve:– Alcohol/Drugs – Lack of SeatBelt Use– Male Drivers– 35-45 mph Roads – Metropolitan Areas
Pole Locations Comparisons
• Curbed– 88% met 1.5’ dist.– 25% met CRC
• Non-curbed – 33% met
AASHTO
• Curbed– 83% met 1.5’ dist.– 42% met CRC
• Non-curbed – 52% met
AASHTO
Crossover
Pole Locations Comparisons
• Curbed-38% CO– 50% met CRC
• Non-curbed-56% CO – 59% met
AASHTO
• Curbed - 33% CO– 50% met CRC
• Non-curbed- 36% CO – 78% met
AASHTO
Georgia Experience
• Curbed Roadways recognized• Effect over time (30 years)• Apparent benefits already realized
• …More Work to be Done!!
GUCC Clear Roadside Committee (CRC)
• CRC Policy:
–guidelines for curbed roadways
–30 year relocation & mitigation plan
Curbed Roadways
• 12 ft desirable
• 6 ft minimum at 35 mph or less
• 8 ft minimum for >35 and <45 mph
Relocation Plan
• Crash history– 3 year timeframe– 3 mile stretches of
road
• State & US Routes
Give and Take
• Move certain number of poles each year
• Developed variance policy for joint-use situations
Georgia Power Program
• Committed to relocate 179 poles per year. Total includes poles relocated on DOT projects that did not meet clear roadside.
• Continuation of program started in 1979
Georgia Power Agreed to
• Goal is to have all poles meet clear roadside in 30 years.
• Relocate poles hit by a vehicle when possible. DOT to provide accident information.
DOT Agreed
• Not require relocation of poles when only adding facilities or reconducting only.
• Allow for replacement of poles in same location for maintenance.
3 42
54
9
8
8
42
Sections with Most Utility Pole Crashes - 1995 to 1997 data
9
8
8
I-20
I-75
I-85
Crash history
• Reduction in observed crashes
• More extensive before-after study needed
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97
Crash Rates
• Crash/AADT
• Observed Reduction in crash rate
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96
3
42
54
42
I-75
I-20
Stewart Avenue/Metropolitan Parkway
What can we do?
• Design jobs to meet clear roadside design
• Review accidents to see if we can avoid future occurrences
• Be aware of poles placed in apex of curves
Review Jobs to Ensure
• Replacement of existing poles meet clear roadside where possible.
• Accidents involving fatalities are investigated to determine if pole can be relocated.
New Program
Georgia DOT
Clear Roadside Committee Mission Statement
A committee formed to develop a comprehensive clear roadside safety program that will improve the safe and efficient use of highway rights of way for the traveling public in the State of Georgia. Once developed, the committee will communicate the benefits of the program to all utilities statewide and strive for participation by all utilities that occupy highway rights of way.
What Are We Attempting to Achieve
• Guidelines for pole placement on rural and urban shoulders
• Reducing facilities and injuries by joint efforts between Utilities and GDOT
• Bring attention to site specific safety considerations
What do the Feds think?
• FHA Program Guide: Utility Relocation and Accommodation on Federal-Aid Highway Projects, Sixth Edition, Section 645.209(k):
• The highway agency shall initiate corrective measures.
• The intent for each State to work with pole owners.• Systematically remove, relocate, or mitigate
hazardously located utility poles.
Why is it Needed.
• Over 3 million utility poles statewide
• On average of 50 deaths and approx. 3400 injuries each year
Pole Accident Rates 1995 - 2003Off-System Utility Poles: On-System Utility Poles: All-Routes Utility Poles:
Year # Accidents Total No. Injuries
Total No. Fatalities
TNF where MHE**=Pole
# Accidents Total No. Injuries
Total No. Fatalities
TNF where MHE**=Pole
# Accidents Total No. Injuries
Total No. Fatalities
TNF where MHE**=Pole
1995 2,629 1,572 41 34 1,255 822 22 19 3,884 2,394 63 531996 2,778 1,687 35 31 1,266 819 18 14 4,044 2,506 53 451997 2,821 1,589 32 25 1,268 721 21 21 4,089 2,310 53 461998* 1,901 1,015 42 31 804 472 30 24 2,705 1,487 72 551999* 2,190 1,216 31 29 1,005 547 24 19 3,195 1,763 55 482000 2,490 1,330 40 39 1,191 716 16 15 3,681 2,046 56 542001 2,447 1,255 31 26 1,150 624 12 11 3,597 1,879 43 372002 2,636 1,384 33 32 1,160 684 8 7 3,796 2,068 41 392003* 1,267 598 24 21 559 326 5 5 1826 924 29 26
Grand Totals: 21,159 11,646 309 268 9,658 5,731 156 135 30,817 17,377 465 403Average: 2,351 1,294 34 1,073 637 17 3,424 1,931 52
*Please note 1998 data is 77% complete, 1999 data is 87% complete, & 2003 data is 41% complete.**MHE=M ost Harmful E vent
Why is it Needed.
• Over 3 million utility poles statewide
• On average of 50 deaths and approx. 3400 injuries each year
• Georgia ranks 13th in Pole Fatality Accidents
Accidents
• Information will be sent to the pole owner for their review
Permitting (New Facilities)• All new facilities (in rural areas) will follow the Roadside
Design Guide, current edition, published by AASHTO as a guide in determining current clear roadside requirements.
• Curb Section - Where there are curbed sections the utilities are to be located as far as practical behind the back of curb. The following is the minimum lateral clearances based on the respective posted speed limits:
• Minimum Lateral Clearance Posted Speed Limit (mph) • 12’ 45• 8’ 35 to 40• 6’ 0 to 30
• The lateral clearance is measured from the back of curb to the face of pole. However, in all of the above cases, the facility shall not encroach upon current ADA sidewalk clearances.
Proactive Efforts
• The DOT would assist in funding for the relocations of poles
• $5,000,000 of safety funds
• 50% assistance
•Accidents involving pole fatalities will be sent to the pole owner for his review. If the pole was the determining factor, the poles in the area in question will be addressed immediately.•Major rehab projects where 33% of poles are being replaced or added the pole owner will be required to relocate all the poles in the permit request to current clear roadside requirements. •Where accident data for a pole line shows an average of 1 accident per mile per year for the last 3 years (with none being a fatality), and where the pole location doesn’t meet clear roadside requirements; the pole owner will be required to relocate that section of line or use approved mitigation methods. •All new facilities will be required to meet current clear roadside requirements shown in the DOT Accommodation Manual. •Proactive effort by the participating utilities to address high accident location in their service area. The DOT would assist in funding relocations of poles based on accident when safety funds are available.
Current Schedule
• First Project - CSSTP-0007-00(072) has currently been identified
• GDOT working on Guidelines and Agreements
• Utilities working on cost estimates (starting October)
• Project set for January 2005
Future Planning
• Try to always set back during maintenance activities
• Look at the type and number of poles utilized
• Location, Location, Location
Site Specific Safety Considerations
• Curves• “T” Intersections• Lane Drops or Deceleration Lanes• Intersecting Streets• Kinks in Alignment• Driveways or Alleys
Curves
“T” Intersections
Lane Drops or
Deceleration Lanes
Intersecting Streets
Kinks in Alignment
Driveways or Alleys
The pole usually wins
Questions?
top related