sustainable energy solutions - the social aspects of planning with the community
Post on 23-Feb-2016
43 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Sustainable Energy Solutions - the social
aspects of planning with the community
November 24-27, 2009, SOAC Conference, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA
AGENDA
Contextual Background – Collaborative Planning
Evaluative Analyses – Deliberative Process
Conclusions – Research & Practice
Project Background“Intelligent Grid-Distributed Energy” –CSIRO.
Efficient Electricity Grid – Low Emission!
Social Aspects: Planning - Sustainable Energy. ENERGY GOVERNANCE – Public Participation - Planning - energy security - regional communities!
Deliberative process & outcomes – Western Power.
Abelson’s (2003) Deliberative Evaluative Framework!
Context – Power Working Group Western Power – 2 regional SW
region. Outrage – Blackouts – Loss Income.
Edge of Grid – Reliability. Establishment - Public Participation: Typical stakeholders (Shire, Business,
Government/NGOs). 14 Community A - 3 Community B
Representation - Impacts. Representatives - Expertise.
Characteristics - Represenatives
Community A - Environmental activists & supporters – Values green solutions!
Community B -Councillor, CEO, Govt –
Neutral – Social/Economic. WIN – Halt ‘Power Lines’ Feasibility – Local RE AGENDA – Learning Curve.
PROCEDURAL ASPECTS - FORUMS
CHAIRED - steep learning curve. OBSERVE - feedback – Model. ISSUE – PROBLEMMATIC: Representation – Differed Markedly: 14 V 3 representatives. Human & Social Capital – Community A
- Expertise RE systems. knowledge & resources! Early Adopters – political network. Entrepreneurs - energy initiatives.
Community Expertise & Facilitation Energy Efficient Educational
Facility; Government funding - community-
owned wind farm. Community A - numbers, status &
expertise – influence – initiatives. Community B less numbers &
expertise – reliant facilitation skills! CONSENSUS – feasibility planning Deliberation - fair procedural
process.
Facilitation & Power Dynamics
Community B – Aspirations ignored! - Disempowerment & alienation –
Disengage! Acknowledged - uneven power dynamics! CHANGE -power relationship “institution &
community”. INCORPORATED local knowledge - major
cultural shift - governance relations! INFLUENCE – management! Satisfied - governance & energy goals!
Deliberative V Dominance
Effectiveness - Favoured – Missed Issue!
Powerful - deeply deliberative “open dialogue & reasoned discussion”.
DOMINATED - more powerful - skilled, neutral facilitator.
ATTRIBUTED – naivety!
FAIR - First time!
INEXPERIENCE – relied – experienced – process & initiatives!
DECISION UNDERMINED EARLY - learning curve – Decisions -
Undermined. (a) participant selection - broader
social mix Representation – environmental! Social & Economic - debated. CHALLENGE – AFFECTED - not
present! PROCEDURAL – validity - energy
visions. FORUM - working week -working
residents/business. CHAIRED – AGENDA – Officers!
Wind Farm Initiative - Challenged E.g. –Validity – challenged:
Wind farm project - Community A.
Backing – Government!
SITING - coastal landscape - powerful sectors!
Development - community support.
Site Selection – contentious!
Shire Rejected - politics.
PROCEDURAL FAILURES FACTORS – key – Diverse
Representation. Accountability & Transparency
Lacking:Failed - regular feedback & inputacceptance & opposition.
Involved/Consulted - wind farm project! Anti-Development Solution. Opposed RE & EE - BARRIER
economic growth!
Incorporating Diverse Needs & Interests BUSINESS: power– applications rejected.
Social & economic- planning framework. Sustainability- environmental, social,
economic and governance! “consensus is not necessary – but an effective
deliberation process must include exposure of conflicts to provide the opportunity to understand it, in order to move respectfully (Carson, 2009).
“… without a very inclusive sample, the process will lack credibility amongst those who should be influenced” (Carson & Hartz-Karp, 2005).
Outcomes Community Engagement Work in Progress – E.g. Trust - positive relationship! Empowered – responsive - Aspirations! SPARKED - Educational initiatives -
awareness -EE - RE technologies. Proactive - community-wide approach -
energy sensitive behavioural change! Lobbying- Regulatory & Institutional
constraints!
Positive Outcomes
Socio-political & institutional – “cultural transformation of mindset” - alternative solutions.
FLEXIBLE – options - coal fired power! POSITIVE - individual, community & societal! PROCEDURAL- transparent & accountable.
visions & priorities! INEQUITY & UNDER-REPRESENTATION:
Location; Chair – rotated; Feedback & Input; Diverse Representation
– Local Media
Community Engagement Practitioners VIGILANT -power & inclusivity. DESIGNED - procedural justice! FAILINGS – beneficial - EE solutions. Institutional – mindset changes - community
aspirations - sustainable energy transition! Community A – Leading – Strategies –
Behavioural Changes – Reduce Consumption & GHG emissions!
FORUM - collaborative planning – groundwork -acceptance -alternative energy solutions.
Barriers – Sustainable Energy Planning DEMONSTRATE - economic growth not
curtailed fierce local opposition.
DILEMMA - Twin Demands: - Reducing ghg emissions & energy
consumption Growth – energy demand.
Political pressures: green sector – frustrated -small scale
efforts! pro-development – planning – inability –
current & future growing energy needs.
Conclusion PRECARIOUS – Plan Energy Security –
Options – NOT constrain Economy Regions! COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT – VITAL –
Strategies! DIFFICULTIES – Opportunity – Community
Ownership – Planning Future! RESEARCH – “dynamics at play” – Civil
Society Sectors! SOCIALLY JUST - process and outcome -
most vulnerable in the power of politics!
Thank you
• For more information on the iGrid Research program:• The website address is www.igrid.net.au• This forms part of our overall communications strategy. The website isa vehicle for dissemination cluster research findings and to facilitate theengagement with key industry stakeholders.
top related