sung-won lee 1 study of hadronic w decays in the jets + met final state @ lhc kittikul kovitanggoon...
Post on 01-Jan-2016
214 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Sung-Won Lee 1
Study of Hadronic W Decays in the Jets + MET Final State
@ LHCKittikul Kovitanggoon* & Sung-
Won LeeTexas Tech University
Michael Weinberger & Teruki Kamon
Texas A&M University
Hadronic W decays in the Jets+MET Final State at the LHC
EventEvent JetsJets M(jj)M(jj) M(jj)M(jj)
1 1a, 1b, 1c
2 2a, 2b M(2a, 1a), M(2a, 1b), M(2a, 1c)M(2b, 1a), M(2b, 1b), M(2b, 1c)
M(2a, 2b)
3 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d M(3a, 2a), M(3a, 2b), M(3b, 2a), M(3b, 2b), M(3c, 2a), M(3c, 2b), M(3d, 2a), M(3d, 2b)
M(3a, 3b), M(3a, 3c), M(3a, 3d),M(3b, 3c), M(3b, 3d), M(3c, 3d)
4 For each jjii in Event XX, MM((jji i jjkk) ) is calculated with jjkk in Event XX11
Data Driven MethodForming M(jj) Distributions
Same Event: any pairs of jets of the current event
Mixed Event: any pairs of jets of the current + previous events
[Step.1] [Step.2]
2
tt production @ LHC
Hadronic W decays in the Jets+MET Final State at the LHC
)( )( bWbWttpp jj l
Data: TTbar_0jet_Et30alpgen/Summer08_IDEAL_V12_AODSIM_v1/AODSIM
M(jj) (GeV/c2)
Same event
Mixed event after normalization
Expected shoulder due to b-jets contamination
M(jj) (GeV/c2)MW
Peak position
3
Generator Level Study for
Hadronic W decays in the Jets+MET Final State at the LHC
tt
• In order to verify the data-driven method and investigate the shoulder from b jets the generator level jets were used
After subtraction
Before subtraction
M(jj) (GeV/c2)
After subtraction
Before subtraction
M(jj) (GeV/c2)
M(jj) for jets from W and b M(jj) for jets only from W
4
Comparing with and without B jets
Hadronic W decays in the Jets+MET Final State at the LHC
All Jets
Exclude B Jets
M(jj) (GeV/c2)
5
b-tag analysis
Hadronic W decays in the Jets+MET Final State at the LHC
• According to the gen level analysis, the shoulder is due to the b jets contamination• In order to remove this shoulder, b-tag algorithm is needed • There are 2 types of b-tag algorithms recommended to use in the PAT version 1 on CMSSW_2_2_9
1. "Track Counting" algorithm : This is a very simple tag, exploiting the long lifetime of B hadrons. It calculates the signed impact parameter significance of all good tracks, and orders them by decreasing significance. Its b tag discriminator is defined as the significance of the N'th track , where good tracks are N = 2 for high efficiency and N = 3 for high purity
2. "Simple Secondary Vertex" algorithm: This reconstructs the B decay vertex using an adaptive vertex finder, and then uses variables related to it, such as decay length significance to calculate its b tag discrimatinator
•The cut number is recommended by b-tagging analysis group for Summer08 sample• HighEff less than 2.03• HighPur less than 1.47• Simple Secondary Vertex less than 1.25
6
b-tag analysis
Hadronic W decays in the Jets+MET Final State at the LHC
For CaloJet ET > 30 GeV and abs(eta) < 2with MC b matching
• b-tag removing efficiency can be calculated from this results
HighEff 70.7%HighEff 70.7%
HighPur 54.8%
simSecondVer 56.6%simSecondVer 56.6%
No b tagHighEff b tagHighPur b tagsimSecondVer b tag
7
b-tag analysis
Hadronic W decays in the Jets+MET Final State at the LHC
• The result shows that the HighEff b-tagging can remove b jets better than other b discriminators• Apply the HighEff b-tagging into the data-driven method to eliminate the b jets contamination
Same event
Mixed event after normalization
M(jj) (GeV/c2)
Before subtraction
After subtraction
M(jj) (GeV/c2)
8
b-tag analysis
Hadronic W decays in the Jets+MET Final State at the LHC
Zoom-in M(jj) after
Subtraction
Zoom-in M(jj) after
Subtraction
MW
Peak position
9
b-tag analysis
Hadronic W decays in the Jets+MET Final State at the LHC
• Using maximum entry to normalize with and without HighEff b-tag algorithm and imposing both on the same histogram • It is clearly see that b-tagging algorithm can eliminate the shoulder from b jet contamintaion
No b tag algorithm
HighEff b tag algorithm
10
Conclusions and Plans
Hadronic W decays in the Jets+MET Final State at the LHC
• At this point, data-driven method gives good result for analyzing hadronic W decay, however we need to test this method by mixing the signal with some backgrounds• The generator level study confirms the result and identifies the reason of the shoulder due to b jet contamination• The High Efficiency b –tagging algorithm is used to eliminate the shoulder from the calo level jets• Without b jet contamination, dijet mass distribution shows good peak as expected • However, peak position is still higher than 80 GeV i.e. W mass • The JES correction is the next step to do in order to fix the higher than expect peak position • Also, moving the analysis to the new version of PAT on CMSSW3xx
11
Case 1: tt production @ LHC
Event Selection - Electron pT > 20 GeV/c - Electron Isolation < 0.1 - Standard Electron Identification - Electron < 2.5 - Missing Transverse Energy > 20 GeV
Event Selection - Electron pT > 20 GeV/c - Electron Isolation < 0.1 - Standard Electron Identification - Electron < 2.5 - Missing Transverse Energy > 20 GeV
M(jj) Reconstruction - Jet pT > 30 GeV/c - ΔR(jj) > 0.5
M(jj) Reconstruction - Jet pT > 30 GeV/c - ΔR(jj) > 0.5
Hadronic W decays in the Jets+MET Final State at the LHC
)( )( bWbWttpp jj l
Data: TTbar_0jet_Et30alpgen/Summer08_IDEAL_V12_AODSIM_v1/AODSIM
13
Case 2: SUSY Production @ LHC))()(( 0
102 ~bWbW~ttg~
Event Pre-Selection• ET
miss > 180 GeV;
• N(J) > 2 with ET J1,J2 > 200 GeV;
• ETmiss + ET
J1 + ETJ2 > 600 GeV
N(jjii) > 2 with pT > 30 GeVΔR(jj) > 0.5
W
W -b0
2~
01~
tt
• J : represented the 1st and 2nd leading jets• j : represented the other jets that are not the 1st and 2nd leading jets
Hadronic W decays in the Jets+MET Final State at the LHC
Data: SUSY_LM7-sftsht/Summer08_IDEAL_V9_AODSIM_v1/AODSIM
14
Hadronic W decays in the Jets+MET Final State at the LHC
Data Driven M(jj) Extraction for SUSY Step 1: Normalization
300-500 GeV/c2
Log Scale
Normalization Region
Normalize the mixed event to the shape of the tail of the same event with the ratio
M(jj) (GeV/c2) M(jj) (GeV/c2)
Same event
Mixed event after normalization
15
top related