student achievement - boarddocs...grade 6 parcc math item ccr: understanding the shift • new sat...

Student AchievementMultiple Measures of Performance

Dr. Russell Brown

&

Dr. Mary Boswell-

McComas

Presented to the Baltimore County Board of Education Work Session on September 26, 2017

Context and Achievement

• Multiple measures – what and why

• Raising the bar – understanding the

shift

• Report on student outcomes by

grade band

• Moving forward

Multiple Measures: What and Why

Deciphering the code –

• KRA – Kindergarten Readiness Assessment

• MSA – Maryland School Assessment

• PARCC – Partnership for Assessment of

Readiness for College and Careers

• MAP – Measures of Academic Progress

• PSAT – Pre-Scholastic Aptitude Test

• SAT – Scholastic Aptitude Test

• CTE – Career and Technology Education

• College – Enrollment and Persistence

Measuring our Students’ Growth & Achievement

Measuring our Students’ Growth & Achievement

Raising the Bar –Understanding the Shift

in Expectations from MSA to PARCC

MSA to CCR: Understanding the Shift

• Old Grade 6

MSA math

item

CCR: Understanding the Shift

• New

Grade 6

PARCC

math item

CCR: Understanding the Shift

• New

SAT

math

item

Career and College Readiness (CCR)

MSA proficiency and the PARCC

career and college readiness threshold

are not equivalent.

They align to different opportunity

thresholds – graduation vs. career and

college readiness.

Grades K-3: Achievement and Growth

KRA

MAP

Grades K-3: Kindergarten Readiness

Grades K-3: Growth and Achievement

• We have seen steady increases in reading growth

and achievement, as measured by MAP.

Grades K-3: Growth and Achievement

• We have seen steady increases in mathematics

growth and achievement, as measured by MAP.

Grade 3: Lighthouse MAP Reading

• Students in Lighthouse schools have led the way

with improvements in growth and achievement.

Grade 3: Lighthouse MAP Mathematics

• Students in Lighthouse schools have led in

mathematics, as well.

Grades 3-5: Achievement and Growth

MAP

PARCC

Grades 3-5: Achievement

• The gains on MAP were also reflected on PARCC.

• ELA scores went up in Grades 3-5.

Grades 3-5: Achievement

• Results in mathematics on both MAP and PARCC

were mixed.

Grades 3-5: Lighthouse PARCC Reading

• Across Grades 3-5, students in Lighthouse

schools outperformed the state as a whole.

Grades 3-5: Lighthouse PARCC Mathematics

• Students in Lighthouse schools also outperformed

the state as a whole in mathematics.

Grades 6-8: Achievement and Growth

MAP

PARCC

Grades 6-8: Achievement and Growth – ELA

• Scores went up or remained stable in reading.

Grades 6-8: Achievement – Mathematics

• Results in mathematics were mixed.

Grades 6-8: Algebra 1 Comparison

• Algebra results varied substantially by grade level.

Grades 6-8: Achievement – Mathematics

• Full cohort testing shows a much more consistent picture. Our mathematics scores are slightly declining.

High School and Beyond

PARCC

PSAT

SAT

Career

College

Achievement: PARCC ELA 10

AllStudents

AmericanIndian orAlaskaNative

AsianBlack orAfrican

American

Hispanic/Latino

NativeHawaiianor OtherPacific

Islander

WhiteTwo ormoreraces

2016 42.0 40.9 59.6 27.9 27.6 38.5 56.5 48.7

2017 46.1 52.0 67.0 30.2 31.3 62.5 61.9 56.8

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

PARCC ELA 10 Proficiency by Race/Ethnicity

2016 2017

• Our students showed a 4.1 percentage point increase on PARCC 10.

• Gains were observed by all racial subgroups.

Achievement: SAT

2016-2017 2015-2016One Year

Change

SAT Test Count 6,341 6,280 61

SAT Participation Rate 87.9% 86.6% 1.3

SAT EBRW Score 506 502 4

SAT Mathematics Score 491 488 3

SAT Total Section Score1 997 990 7

• Access continues to increase.

• Performance has also increased overall and for all

reportable subgroups.

Graduation Rate

86

.30

87

.63

87

.78

89

.17

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00

2013 2014 2015 2016

Pe

rce

nta

ge

of

Stu

de

nts

• Steady growth in our students’ graduation rate.

Career

Greater access:

• Our enrollment in Career and

Technology Education courses

continues to rise (15,409).

Improved career readiness:

• More students are completing CTE

pathways.

Career

Improved career readiness:

• More students are meeting industry

certification standards (79%).

• More are meeting dual completion

standards (74%).

Improved placement:

• 83.76% of CTE completers entered

post-secondary education,

employment, or the military within 2

quarters following graduation.

College

• College going rates have remained

steady at 61%.

• College persistence rates have

increased slightly to 87%.

• Increases in persistence have

occurred at all institution types

(2- and 4-year/public and private).

Summary

Summary

Despite the challenges of declining

Kindergarten readiness and above

average poverty rates, we see:

• Consistent gains in reading and mathematics

Grades K-3, as measured by MAP.

• Positive improvements in Grades 3-5 ELA,

with students in our Lighthouse schools

exceeding the performance of the state.

• Room for improvement in mathematics.

Summary

Despite the challenges of declining

Kindergarten readiness and above

average poverty rates, we see:

• ELA scores in Grades 6-8 and 10 have increased

or remained stable.

• SAT access and performance has improved for all

student groups.

• Improvements in access, readiness, and

placement for our students who elect career

pathways.

• College going rates have remained stable as

persistence rates have improved.

Moving Forward

Mathematics: What have we learned?

Where Students Struggle• Foundational numeracy skills

• Algebraic expressions and equations

• Reasoning and application

Literacy Demands within Mathematics• Students need increased opportunities to

access complex mathematics problems in context.

Mathematics: What will we do?

High Leverage Practices• School-based collaborative planning

• Classroom instructional coaching

Professional Learning• Focus on literacy skills that will grow

students’ abilities to analyze and solve context-based mathematics problems.

Analyze and Revise Curriculum

English Language Arts:

What have we learned?

Where Students Struggle• Reading nonfictional text

• Identifying and evaluating the argument in a text

• Analyzing how and why individuals and events develop in text

• Identifying how point-of-view or purpose shape the text

Literacy Demands Across Disciplines• Students need increased opportunities to

access complex text across disciplines.

English Language Arts:

What will we do?High Leverage Practices

• School-based collaborative planning

• Range finding – using public release tasks/scoring annotations

Professional Learning• Analyzing school-based evidence statements

• Nonfiction reading strategies and vocabulary development

• Systematic, explicit phonics instruction in primary grades

Analyze and Revise Curriculum

Questions?