staff report seven j's subdivision lot 10 ... county, florida development review staff report...
Post on 20-Jul-2019
217 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
STAFF REPORT
{
A. Application Information
SEVEN J'S SUBDIVISION LOT 10 FERREIRA
Revised Minor Final Site Plan
Applicant: Ferreira Family, LLC
Property Owner: Ferreira Family, LLC
Agent for the Applicant: The MilCor Group, Inc., Melissa G. Corbett
County Project Coordinator: Catherine Riiska, MS, PWS, Principal Planner
Growth Management Director: Nicki van Vonno, AICP
Project Number: P102-057
Application Type and Number: D051 201700156
Report Number: 2017_0720_P102-057_DRT_Staff_FINAL.docx
Application Received: 05/16/2017
Transmitted: 05/16/2017
Staff Report: 07/20/2017
Joint Workshop: 07/27/2017
B. Project description and analysis
This is an application for an industrial, minor development final site plan. This application has been
submitted to request approval for the construction of an outdoor storage yard. Included in this
application is a request for a Certificate of Public Facilities Reservation.
The subject site consists of approximately 4.17 acres of vacant land located at 8641 SW Joseph Way,
Palm City, within the Seven J's industrial subdivision, designated as a freestanding urban service district.
The subject site has a designated future land use of Industrial and a zoning district of GI, General
Industrial. A minor development final site plan consisting of approximately 6,000 s. f. of outdoor
storage and approximately 42,000 s.f. of warehouse with supporting infrastructure was approved on
December 11, 2007, (OR BK 2314 PG 2556) and subsequently expired without being constructed. The
applicant is proposing to modify the site design in the current application for a minor development
revised final site plan.
The proposed site improvements consist of a stabilized equipment storage area of approximately 3.01
acres with perimeter chain-link fencing, associated perimeter landscaping and stormwater areas. No
building structures are proposed as part of this application. The proposed outdoor equipment storage use
meets the classification of a limited impact industry, which is a permitted use of the site. The applicant
has indicated that no water or wastewater services or infrastructure are being proposed at this time, but
that such services will be met by a potable water well and septic system if needed in the future.
Development Review Staff Report
Page 2 of 18
C. Staff recommendation
The specific findings and conclusion of each review agency related to this request are identified in
Sections F through T of this report. The current review status for each agency is as follows:
Section Division or Department Reviewer Phone Assessment
F Comprehensive Plan Catherine Riiska 288-5667 Pending
F ARDP Samantha Lovelady 288-5664 N/A
G Development Review Catherine Riiska 288-5667 Non-Comply
H Urban Design Santiago Abasolo 288-5485 N/A
H Community Redevelopment Santiago Abasolo 288-5485 N/A
I Property Management Colleen Holmes 288-5794 N/A
J Environmental Shawn McCarthy 288-5508 Non-Comply
J Landscaping Karen Sjoholm 288-5909 Non-Comply
K Transportation Stephanie Piche 223-4858 Comply
L County Surveyor Michael O’Brien 288-5418 N/A
M Engineering Stephanie Piche 223-4858 Non-Comply
N Addressing Emily Kohler 288-5692 Comply
N Electronic File Submission Emily Kohler 288-5692 Comply
O Water and Wastewater James Christ 320-3034 Comply
O Wellfields James Christ 320-3034 Comply
P Fire Prevention Doug Killane 288-5633 Comply
P Emergency Management Dan Wouters 219-4942 N/A
Q ADA Judy Lamb 221-1396 N/A
R Health Department Todd Reinhold 221-4090 Comply
R School Board Kimberly Everman 223-3105 N/A
S County Attorney Krista Storey 288-5443 Review Ongoing
T Adequate Public Facilities Catherine Riiska 288-5667 Review Pending
D. Review Board action
This application meets the threshold of a minor development and, as such, shall be reviewed by the
Growth Management Director as designated by the County Administrator, pursuant to Article 10 of the
Land Development Regulations.
E. Location and site information
Parcel number(s) and address:
07-38-40-001-000-0010.0-00000 8641 SW Joseph Way
Nearest major road: SW Busch St W & SW Poma Dr
Census tract: 0017 Tract
Commission district: 5
Community redevelopment area: Not Applicable
Municipal service taxing unit: District 5
Planning area: North Mid
Storm surge zone: Not Available
Taxing district: District D
Traffic analysis zone: 86
Gross area of site: 4 acres
Development Review Staff Report
Page 3 of 18
Figure 1: Location Map
Figure 2: Subject Site 2017 Aerial with Preserve and Site Plan Overlay
Development Review Staff Report
Page 4 of 18
Adjacent existing or proposed development:
To the north: Industrial, outdoor storage
To the south: Industrial, manufacturing and outdoor storage (across SW Jayme Way)
To the east: Undeveloped, wetland preserve
To the west: Undeveloped, wetland preserve (across SW Joseph Way)
Figure 3: Local Area 2017 Aerial with Existing and Proposed Development
Zoning district designations of abutting properties:
To the north: GI, General Industrial
To the south: GI, General Industrial
To the east: GI, General Industrial
To the west: GI, General Industrial
Figure 4: Zoning Map
Development Review Staff Report
Page 5 of 18
Future land use designations of abutting properties:
To the north: Industrial
To the south: Industrial
To the east: Industrial
To the west: Industrial
Figure 5: Future Land Use Map
F. Determination of compliance with Comprehensive Growth Management Plan requirements -
Growth Management Department
Unresolved Issues:
Item #1:
Generic Comp Plan Compliance-GMD
This application cannot be deemed to be in compliance with the Martin County Comprehensive Growth
Management Plan (CGMP) until the issues identified in this report have been satisfactorily resolved.
MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., CGMP POLICY 4.1A.1. (2016)
Additional Information:
Information #1:
Pursuant to Section 10.2.D.7., LDR, Martin County, Fla. (2016), “When reviewing an application for a
development permit that is certified by a professional listed in F.S. § 403.0877, the County shall not
request additional information from the applicant more than three times, unless the applicant waives the
limitation in writing. If the applicant believes the request for additional information is not authorized by
ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal authority, the County, at the applicant's request, shall proceed to
process the application for approval or denial.”
Item #19 on the signed and notarized application form was not selected by the agent. The restrictions of
a maximum of three requests for information from the licensed agent must be adhered to by the County
Development Review Staff Report
Page 6 of 18
process as required by the provisions of Section 403.0877, Fla. Stat. (2016). Therefore, this application
may not be subject to any resubmittals beyond the first elective resubmittal (second resubmittal), and the
third staff report issued may be considered final, unless the applicant elects to waive these limitations in
writing.
G. Determination of compliance with land use, site design standards, zoning, and procedural
requirements - Growth Management Department
Unresolved Issues:
Item #1:
Site Plan
A complete site plan is required as part of the application pursuant to Section 10.2.B.5., LDR, Martin
County, Fla.
Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification: 1. Please revise the project name block that currently cites "Seven J's Subdivision" to reflect the
project name "Seven J's Parcel 10".
2. The total site area cited on the proposed final site plan is inconsistent with the total site area cited
on the certified survey.
3. Please label the detention as 'wet' or 'dry' consistent with the project proposal.
4. Please dimension setbacks consistent with the GI zoning district requirements from the property
line to the stabilized equipment storage area. Pursuant to Section 3.16, LDR, Martin County, Fla.
(2007), except as set forth in subsection 3.16.B., every part of every required front, side and rear
setback shall be comprised of open space.
5. Please clarify the purpose of the notation "Typical Bays" as cited in the lower left hand corner of
the site plan which appears to be associated with a fencing diagram.
Item #2:
Option 1 Other Agency Permits
The applicant has elected 'Option 1' regarding Agency permit submittal for review for consistency. No
final site plan shall be approved until all applicable local, state, and federal approved permits are
submitted and reviewed by the County Administrator. If an application is made to any permitting agency
for a modification to a permit that was required to be issued prior to final site plan approval, the
application for the permit modification must be submitted concurrently to Martin County. MARTIN
COUNTY, FLA., LDR §10.9.A (2016)
Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification:
The submitted water use permit appears to be associated with the previous site plan design and
utilization, which was never constructed. Please submit other agency permits that are consistent with the
current project proposal.
Item #3:
Boundary & Topographic Surveys
Provide recent boundary and topographic surveys of all properties that are the subject of this application.
MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR, § 10.2.B.5. (2016)
Development Review Staff Report
Page 7 of 18
Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification:
Staff was unable to locate a digital copy of the survey. Please submit a full resolution PDF file of the
survey.
Additional Information:
Information #1:
No land clearing is authorized prior to the mandatory pre-construction meeting for the project. Property
corners and preservation areas shall be located by a licensed land surveyor and clearly marked in the
field prior to the pre- construction meeting. Authorization for clearing to install erosion control devices
and preserve barricades will be granted at the pre-construction meeting. No additional land clearing shall
commence until a satisfactory inspection of the required control structures and barricades has been
obtained. Authorization for the relocation of gopher tortoises within the development, as provided for on
state agency permits, may be granted by the Growth Management Department upon review of required
permit materials. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR SECTION 4.37. (2017)
Information #2:
Timetable Of Development - Final
The timetable of development for final site plans require all permits to be obtained within one year of
approval and require all construction to be completed within two years of approval. MARTIN
COUNTY, FLA., LDR SECTIONS 10.1 AND 5.32. (2017)
H. Determination of compliance with the urban design and community redevelopment requirements
– Community Development Department
No dedication of additional right of way is required or proposed by the Applicant pursuant to the
Roadway Classifications set forth in Section 4.843.B, Land Development Regulations, Martin County,
Fla. (2001) which includes Table 4.19.1 that lists the minimum right-of-way requirements. Therefore,
the Applicant is not required to submit due diligence materials for review by Real Property
Management.
I. Determination of compliance with the property management requirements – Engineering
Department
Commercial Design
The proposed project is not located within the General Commercial, Limited Commercial, Commercial
Office/Residential or Waterfront Commercial Future Land Use Designations. Therefore, the
Commercial Design reviewer was not required to review this application. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA.,
LDR SECTION 4.871.B. (2016)
Community Redevelopment Area
The proposed project is not located within a Community Redevelopment Area. Therefore, the
Community Redevelopment Area reviewer was not required to review this application. MARTIN
COUNTY, FLA., LDR ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 6 (2016)
Development Review Staff Report
Page 8 of 18
J. Determination of compliance with environmental and landscaping requirements - Growth
Management Department
Environmental
Unresolved Issues:
Item #1:
Environmental Assessment
Please include the following information with the environmental assessment for your project (ref.
MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR Section 4.32 (2013) and Section 4.6 (2011):
1. A field survey and map shall be made showing the areas of the site surveyed for listed species.
Surveys shall be performed and certified as utilizing appropriate referenced survey
methodologies established by the listing agencies. In addition to listed fauna, the survey shall
locate specific species of rare, endangered, threatened or unique plants of limited range that have
been found (e.g. four-petal paw paw in Jensen Beach sand pine scrub) so that they can be
included in preserve areas. Additional permits from other agencies may be required if listed
species are found to be present onsite.
a. Please have your environmental consultant contact the environmental staff identified in
this report to schedule a site visit of your project or to provide for site access to
corroborate the information provided in the environmental assessment.
Landscape
Unresolved Issues:
Item #1:
Standard Application Requirements
The deficiencies noted in this section need to be addressed by the applicant with revised plans and
documentation. To ensure a successful review, the following shall be provided with your resubmittal
information:
Revision dates/notes on all affected plans.
A landscape plan is required with this application. The landscape plans must be prepared and sealed by
a registered landscape architect and include all information required for submittal as specified in Section
4.662.A, LDR. Indicate the location and type of all the following, both existing and proposed:
1. Property boundaries, land use, rights-of-way and easements.
2. On-site and abutting land use features, including adjacent sidewalks, existing vegetation, natural
features and site improvements within 50 feet of the property.
3. All overhead, above and underground utilities, including septic tanks, drainfields and RPZ
valves.
Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification:
Show property dimensions on plans. Show overhead existing overhead power, oaks are planned along
the south property line, will they meet FPL Right Tree requirements?. There is a note on the landscape
plans saying that future overhead power lines along the front of the parcel, these are not shown on
Development Review Staff Report
Page 9 of 18
construction plans, are these proposed in association with this project?
Item #2:
General Landscape Design Standards
Please demonstrate compliance with the following general landscape requirements on the provided
plans:
1. The following statement is provided: "All prohibited species shall be removed from the entire
site prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy." (Section 4.664, LDR)
Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification:
Add note.
Item #3:
Perimeter VUA Requirements-Non-Res Sites
Please demonstrate compliance with the following criteria for perimeter vehicular use areas (Section
4.663.A.4.a., LDR)
1. Perimeter shrub requirements around vehicular use areas. Shrubs with 15 to 23 inches of spread
shall be planted on three foot centers; shrubs with greater than 23 inches of spread shall be
planted on five-foot centers. In no event shall spacing exceed five feet on center, nor shall plants
be closer than two feet to the edge of any pavement.
Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification:
Landscape plans indicate that existing native vegetation within the 10' VUA buffer shall be preserved
and supplemented as necessary to achieve opacity, however the narrative states that excepts for west
edge most vegetation has been previously cleared and the clearing plan shows the entire site with the
exception of 10 feet adjacent to the preserve to be cleared and filled. Please clarify proposed work.
Item #4:
Interior VUA Requirements-Non-Res Sites
Please demonstrate compliance with the following criteria for interior vehicular use areas [Section
4.663.A. 4.b., LDR]. The interior area includes the entire parcel to be developed exclusive of the
required front, rear, and side perimeter landscape areas. As an incentive to preserving native areas, up to
one-half of the required interior landscape area may be waived when an equal area (at least 800 square
feet) within the vehicle use area is preserved in a native state.
1. In vehicular use areas within the interior of a site, one 500 square foot planting area shall be
required for every 5,000 square feet of vehicular use area, or major portion thereof, and at least
three two-inch, or two three-inch caliper shade trees together with other landscape material shall
be planted within each such planting area.
Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification:
Sufficient pervious/landscape area appears to have been provided to meet the 500/5000 sq. ft.
requirement but it does not appear that the additional trees have been proposed.
Item #5:
Landscaping Adjacent To Utilities
Development Review Staff Report
Page 10 of 18
Tree species and placement shall be selected so as to minimize conflicts with existing or proposed
utilities.
The applicant is required to incorporate the following criteria into the landscape design and such criteria
shall be noted on the plans for development adjacent to utilities:
1. This plan has been designed to meet with the tree planting requirements contained within the
FPL document entitled 'Plant the Right Tree in the Right Place.'
2. For existing or proposed utilities, no tree shall be planted where it could, at mature height,
conflict with overhead power lines.
3. Large trees [height at maturity of more than thirty (30) feet] shall be planted no closer than a
horizontal distance of thirty (30) feet from the nearest overhead power line.
4. Medium height tree [height at maturity between twenty (20) and thirty (30) feet] shall be offset at
least twenty (20) feet and small trees [height at maturity of less than (20) feet] require no offset.
5. No tree, shrubs, hedges or vines shall be planted within five (5) feet of any existing or proposed
utility pole, guy wire or-pad mounted transformer. Palms should be planted at a distance equal
to or greater than the average front length plus two (2) feet from power lines.
Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification:
Verify that tree plantings will meet these guidelines.
K. Determination of compliance with transportation requirements - Engineering Department
Findings of Compliance:
The Traffic Division of the Engineering Department finds this application in compliance.
Compliance with Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance:
Staff has reviewed the Traffic Statement prepared by The MilCor Group, Inc. dated May 1, 2017.
Although the MilCor Group, Inc. stated that the site's maximum impact was assumed to be 1 trips during
the AM and PM peak hours; staff has analyzed the site and evaluated a more conservative trip
generation utilizing the Warehousing ITE Trip Generation for 50% of the 3 acre stabilized equipment
area on the site. Staff has determined that the site's maximum impact will be 8 peak hour directional
trips. The generalized service capacity of SR-714 (SW Martin Hwy) between I-95 and CR-76A (Citrus
Blvd) is 1,200; therefore, the project impact is less than 1% of the maximum volume of that roadway.
This application satisfies the Adequate Public Facilities Standard; because the project impact is
projected to have less than 1% of the maximum volume of that roadway, it has a De Minimis impact.
[Martin County, Fla., LDR Article 5, Division 1, Section 5.3 (2009)]
L. Determination of compliance with county surveyor - Engineering Department
The applicant has provided a certified boundary and topographic survey for the proposed development,
pursuant to Section 10.1.F., LDR, Martin County, Fla. (2016). Therefore, the Engineering Department
was not required to review this application for consistency with the Martin County Codes for survey
requirements contained in Article 4, LDR, Martin County, Fla.
M. Determination of compliance with engineering, storm water and flood management requirements
- Engineering Department
Unresolved Issues:
Development Review Staff Report
Page 11 of 18
Item #1:
Rights Of Way Improvements
Revise the following components to comply with the cited references:
1. Pavement within SW Joseph Way right of way must meet Martin County Standard Detail R-10
for Local Roads. Provide detail. [MARTIN COUNTY FLA STANDARD DETAIL R-10 (2015)]
2. Provide a culvert for the existing roadside drainage swale. The proposed culvert shown is for the
proposed on -site drainage swale.
3. Provide cross section from stabilized area to edge of pavement of SW Joseph Way demonstrating
the proposed regrading of the roadside drainage swale.
4. Provide the turning radii for the driveway entrance on SW Joseph Way. [MARTIN COUNTY,
FLA., LDR SECTION 4.843.E (2010)]
5. Provide a STOP sign and STOP bar at the driveway access on SW Joseph Way. [MARTIN
COUNTY, FLA., LDR SECTION 4.843.H (2010)]
6. Pursuant to Martin County Board of County Commissioners' Resolution 09-2.6, the applicant is
subject to the payment in lieu of construction of the required sidewalks for the development.
Refer to Section U (Post Approval) of this staff report for further details.
Item #2:
Stormwater Mgmt Submitted Materials
Provide the following items to document conformance with the cited references:
1. Signed and sealed stormwater management certification [Martin County, Fla., LDR Section
4.384.A.2 (2015)]
2. An existing conditions map including water management facilities, drainage basin boundaries,
vegetated areas, wetlands, impervious areas, adjacent wetlands, adjacent developments, all wells
and septic systems within 100 feet of the perimeter of the excavation, the FEMA flood zone(s),
the location relative to the Coastal High Hazard Area. or any other significant adjacent features
[MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR SECTIONS 4.343.A.4 & 4.384.A.3 (2015)] [MARTIN
COUNTY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND FLOOD PROTECTION STANDARDS
FOR DESIGN AND REVIEW, SECTIONS 1.4.A.2.b & 1.4.A.3.c (2001)]
Item #3:
Stormwater Mgmt Post-Development
1. The areas for the swale slopes and swale bottom in the Stormwater Management Report (page 4)
are inconsistent with the Construction Plans.
Item #4:
Stormwater Mgmt Construction Plans
1. Provide provisions for removal of oils and sedimentation on CS-1 and C-1.
2. Combine the drainage structure details that are shown on sheet 2 and 3. The drainage structures
on Sheet 3 show proposed weep holes, while the drainage structures on Sheet 2 do not.
N. Determination of compliance with addressing and electronic file submittal requirements – Growth
Management and Information Technology Departments
Addressing
Development Review Staff Report
Page 12 of 18
Findings of Compliance:
The application has been reviewed for compliance with Division 17, Addressing, of the Martin County
Land Development Regulations. Staff finds that the proposed site plan / plat complies with applicable
addressing regulations. All street names are in compliance. They meet all street naming regulations in
Article 4, Division 17, Land Development Regulations. Martin County, Fla. (2016).
Electronic File Submittal
Findings of Compliance:
The Information Services Department staff has reviewed the electronic file submittal and finds it in
compliance with the applicable county requirements.
Both AutoCAD site plan and boundary survey were received and found to be in compliance with
Section 10.2.B.5, Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. (2016)
Both AutoCAD site plan and boundary survey were in State Plane coordinates and found to be in
compliance with Section 10.2.B.5, Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. (2016)
The AutoCAD boundary survey was received and found to be in compliance with Section 10.2.B.5,
Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. (2016)
O. Determination of compliance with utilities requirements - Utilities Department
Water and Wastewater Service
Findings of Compliance:
This development application has been reviewed for compliance with applicable statutes and ordinances
and the reviewer finds it in compliance with Martin County's requirements for water and wastewater
level of service. [Martin County, Fla., LDR, Article 4, Division 6 and 7, (2016)]
Wellfield and Groundwater Protection
Findings of Compliance:
The application has been reviewed for compliance under the Wellfield Protection Program. The
reviewer finds the application in compliance with the Wellfield Protection and Groundwater Protection
Ordinances. [Martin County, Fla., LDR, Article 4, Division 5] (2016)
P. Determination of compliance with fire prevention and emergency management requirements –
Fire Rescue Department
Fire Prevention
Findings of Compliance:
The Fire Prevention Bureau finds this submittal to be in compliance with the applicable provisions
governing construction and life safety standards. This occupancy shall comply with all applicable
provisions of governing codes whether implied or not in this review, in addition to all previous
requirements of prior reviews.
Approval is for outside storage area only.
Development Review Staff Report
Page 13 of 18
Knox access will be required for gate entry.
Additional Information:
Information #1:
The AHJ shall have the authority to:
Require fire department access be provided to gated subdivisions or developments through the use of an
approved device or system [NFPA 1, Chapter 18, Section 2.2.2].
Requires an access box(es) to be installed in an accessible location where access to or within a structure
or area is difficult because of security. [NFPA 1, Chapter 18, Section 2.2.1].
Martin County Fire Rescue utilizes and required the Knox access system. You may contact
www.knoxbox.com to order the Knox system.
Q. Determination of compliance with Americans with Disability Act (ADA) requirements - General
Services Department
Proposed development is not subject to ADA review under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities
Act unless providing public accommodations. This application proposes an industrial equipment yard
without any habitable structures and not open to the public. Pursuant to Section 10.1.F, LDR, Martin
County, Fla. (2016), no public accommodations are proposed as part of this project and a review for
compliance with the ADA is not applicable.
R. Determination of compliance with Martin County Health Department and Martin County School
Board
Martin County Health Department
Findings of Compliance:
The Health Department staff has reviewed the application for this project and finds it in compliance
with the applicable Land Development Regulations.
Additional Information:
Information #1:
In the event of future buildings and or sanitary facilities, an Onsite Sewage Treatment and Disposal
System permit will be required as per 64E-6.001(2) FAC 2013. If waste is defined as commercial an
operating permit will be required. If waste is defined as industrial a septic system variance application
will be required.
Information #2:
Well approval is required per 62-532.200 FAC 2012. The South Florida Water Management District
(SFWMD) General Water Use Permit No. 43-01963-W site plan must match the approved Martin
County site plan upon submission to the Department of Health for well construction permit. (See also
Item #2, Section G)
Development Review Staff Report
Page 14 of 18
S. Determination of compliance with legal requirements - County Attorney's Office
Review Ongoing
T. Determination of compliance with the adequate public facilities requirements - responsible
departments
The following is a summary of the review for compliance with the standards contained in Article 5.7.D
of the Adequate Public Facilities LDR for a Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities Reservation.
Potable water facilities service provider – Not Proposed
Source - Environmental Services Department
Findings – N/A
Reference - see Section O of this staff report
Sanitary sewer facilities service provider – Not Proposed
Source -Environmental Services Department
Findings – N/A
Reference - see Section O of this staff report
Solid waste facilities
Findings – In Place
Source - Growth Management Department
Stormwater management facilities
Findings - Pending
Source - Engineering Department
Reference - see Section N of this staff report
Community park facilities
Findings – N/A
Source - Growth Management Department
Roads facilities
Findings - Comply
Source - Engineering Department
Reference - see Section M of this staff report
Mass transit facilities
Findings – In Place
Source - Engineering Department
Reference - see Section L of this staff report
Public safety facilities
Findings – N/A
Source - Growth Management Department
Reference - see Section P of this staff report
A timetable for completion consistent with the valid duration of the development is to be included in the
Development Review Staff Report
Page 15 of 18
Certificate of Public Facilities Reservation. The development encompassed by Reservation Certificate
must be completed within the timetable specified for the type of development.
U. Post-approval requirements
Approval of the development order is conditioned upon the applicant’s submittal of all required
documents, executed where appropriate, to the Growth Management Department (GMD), including
unpaid fees, within sixty (60) days of the final action granting approval.
Item #1:
Post Approval Requirements List: After approval the applicant will receive a letter and a Post Approval
Requirements List that identifies the documents and fees required. The applicant will return the Post
Approval Requirements List along with the required documents in a packet with the documents arranged
in the order shown on the list.
Item #2:
Post Approval Fees: The applicant is required to pay all remaining fees when submitting the post
approval packet. If an extension is granted, the fees must be paid within 60 days from the date of the
development order. Checks should be made payable to Martin County Board of County Commissioners.
Item #3:
Post Approval Impact Fees: Impact fees must be paid after the development order has been approved.
Submit a check made payable to Martin County Board of County Commissioners within 60 days of
project approval.
Item #4:
Recording Costs: The applicant is responsible for all recording costs. The Growth Management
Department will calculate the recording costs and contact the applicant with the payment amount
required. Checks should be made payable to the Martin County Clerk of Court.
Item #5:
One (1) copy of the recorded warranty deed if a property title transfer has occurred since the site plan
approval. If there has not been a property title transfer since the approval, provide a letter stating that no
title transfer has occurred.
Item #6:
Original and one (1) copy of the current Unity of Title in standard County format if a property title
transfer has occurred since the site plan approval. If there has not been a property title transfer since the
approval, provide a letter stating so that no transfer has occurred.
Item #7:
Ten (10) 24" x 36" copies of the approved construction plans signed and sealed by the Engineer of
Development Review Staff Report
Page 16 of 18
Record licensed in the State of Florida. Fold to 8 by 12 inches.
Item #8:
Ten (10) copies 24" x 36" of the approved site plan.
Item #9:
Original approved site plan on Mylar or other plastic, stable material.
Item #10:
Ten (10) 24" x 36" copies of the approved landscape plan signed and sealed by a landscape architect
licensed in the State of Florida.
Item #11:
One (1) digital copy of site plan in AutoCAD 2010 - 2014 drawing format (.dwg). The digital version of
the site plan must match the hardcopy version as submitted.
Item #12:
Original of the construction schedule.
Item #13:
Two (2) originals of the Cost Estimate, on the County format which is available on the Martin County
website, signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record licensed in the State of Florida.
Item #14:
Original of the Engineer's Design Certification, on the County format which is available on the Martin
County website, signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record licensed in the State of Florida.
Item #15:
Two (2) copies of the documents verifying that the right-of-way, property, or easements have been
adequately dedicated to the Board of County Commissioners and recorded in the public records of
Martin County.
Item #16:
A hauling fee of $0.21 per cubic yard of material being hauled from the site in the amount of $__.__
shall be paid within sixty (60) calendar days of the project approval.
Item #17:
Original and one (1) copy or two (2) copies of the executed and signed Water and Wastewater Service
Agreement with Martin County Regional Utilities and one (1) copy of the payment receipt for Capital
Development Review Staff Report
Page 17 of 18
Facility Charge (CFC) and engineering and recording fees.
V. Local, State, and Federal Permits
Approval of the development order is conditioned upon the applicant's submittal of all required
applicable Local, State, and Federal Permits, to the Growth Management Department (GMD), prior
to the commencement of any construction. An additional review fee will be required for Martin County
to verify that the permits are consistent with the approved development order.
Item #1:
ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS
The following permits must be submitted prior to scheduling the Pre-Construction meeting:
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) listed species permit or plan (Gopher
Tortoise).
Item #2:
RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMITS
The following permits must be submitted prior to scheduling a Pre-Construction meeting:
1. FDOT General Use Permits
2. FDOT Driveway / Connection Permit
3. Martin County Roadway Opening Permit
Item #3:
STORMWATER MGMT PERMITS
The following permits must be submitted prior to scheduling a Pre-Construction meeting:
1. South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Environmental Resource Permit (ERP)
2. South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Dewatering Permit
3. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) Nationwide
4. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Drainage Connection Permit
W. Fees
Public advertising fees for the development order will be determined and billed subsequent to the public
hearing. Fees for this application are calculated as follows:
Fee type: Fee amount: Fee payment: Balance:
Application review fees: $8,750.00 $8,750.00 $0.00
Advertising fees*: TBD
Recording fees**: TBD
Mandatory impact fees: TBD
Non-mandatory impact fees: TBD
Development Review Staff Report
Page 18 of 18
* Advertising fees will be determined once the ads have been placed and billed to the County.
** Recording fees will be identified on the post approval checklist.
X. General application information
Applicant: Ferreira Family, LLC
Nelson Ferreira
37 Tannery Road
Branchburg, NJ 08876
Agent: The MilCor Group, Inc.
Melissa G. Corbett
6526 South Kanner Highway #236
Stuart, FL 34997
772-223-8850
Y. Acronyms
ADA ............. Americans with Disability Act
AHJ .............. Authority Having Jurisdiction
ARDP ........... Active Residential Development Preference
BCC.............. Board of County Commissioners
CGMP .......... Comprehensive Growth Management Plan
CIE ............... Capital Improvements Element
CIP ............... Capital Improvements Plan
FACBC ........ Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction
FDEP ............ Florida Department of Environmental Protection
FDOT ........... Florida Department of Transportation
LDR.............. Land Development Regulations
LPA .............. Local Planning Agency
MCC ............. Martin County Code
MCHD.......... Martin County Health Department
NFPA ........... National Fire Protection Association
SFWMD ....... South Florida Water Management District
W/WWSA .... Water/Waste Water Service Agreement
Z. Attachments
top related