safety and marine environment protection : prospects we face
Post on 12-Feb-2016
49 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Paris MOU on Port State Control
Safety and Marine Environment
Protection: Prospects We Face
Carien DroppersDeputy General Secretary
Paris MOU on Port State Control
Overview:
Results of the Paris MoU activities and future prospects:
Statistics (incl. BWG & RO performance) Introduction of New Inspection Regime
(NIR) in 2011
Paris MoU results 2008• Total inspections 24615• No. deficiencies 83804• No. individual ships insp. 15237• Number of ships detained 1214• Detained 4,93%
of which 14.2% RO related detentions• No. ships refused access 19
Black list 2008 (2006-2008)
(Top of) White list 2008 (2006-2008)
RO Performance list 2008 (2006-2008)
(Top of) RO Performance list 2008 (2006-2008)
Number of inspections
Number of deficiencies observed
Number of detentions
Detention % of inspection
Detention % per ship type
Paris MOU on Port State Control
Concentrated Inspection Campaigns
• 2009: CIC on lifeboat launching appliances (Sep – Nov) Checklist on web site
• 2010: CIC on tanker damage stability(oil and chemical tankers, gas carriers)
• 2011: CIC on structural safety and Load Line Convention
MORE FACTS AND FIGURES,
ANNUAL REPORTS
Paris MoU NIR– PSC Directive 2009/16/EC
NIRNew Inspection Regime
Directive on PSC
TEG, MAB, PSCC
EP, Council, COMDirective on Ropax
Paris MoU Task Force 31 EMSA Leader
2009/16/EC
START COLLECTING
Startup of Paris MoU NIR– PSC Directive 2009/16/EC
OJ Publication28/05/2009
2009 2010 2011 2012
Application01/01/2011
START APPLYING (Considering < 3 yrs)
Detentions on all Ship Types Detentions on Grey List Flags
Company performance RO performance
Banning
Ships Risk Profile (PI and PII)
Regional Commitment MS Fair Share
95/21/EC
3 yrs after enter in force17/06/2012
Full
implementation
with no
restrictions
Enter in force+20 days
NIR
EC Dir 2009/16
MoU 32nd Amendment
NIR consequences Improved targeting
Risk based targeting
Less flexibility for MS in selecting ships for inspectionSRP, PI and PII, Overriding Factors, Unexpected Factors
Regional commitments vs national commitmentsFair Share, Postponement
Further refusal of access provisionsBanning, All ship types
Benchmarking of Flags, RO’s and CompaniesInspection Intervals, Company and ROs Performance
Widened scope from ports to ports and anchoragesFull coverage of ships visiting Paris MoU region
NIR: Ship Risk Profile
HRS – High Risk ShipSRS – Standard Risk ShipLRS – Low Risk Ships
• Generic Factors– Type of Ship– Flag– RO– Company
• Historical Factors– Deficiencies– Detentions
(SRP is recalculated on a daily basis)
High Risk Ship (HRS) Low Risk Ship (LRS)
Criteria Weighting points Criteria
Type Oil, Chemical, Gas Bulk, Passenger 2 All types
Age > 12 yrs 1 All ages
FlagBGW-list
Black - VHR, HR, M to HR 2White
Black – MR 1
IMO-Audit - - Yes
RecognizedOrganisation
Performance
H - - High
M - - -
L Low1
-
VL Very Low -
EU recognised - - Yes
Company Performance
H - - High
M - - -
L Low2
-
VL Very Low -
Nr of def. recorded in each insp. within pr. 36 months
Deficiencies Not eligible -
≤ 5 (and at least 1 insp. carried out in
pr. 36 months)
Nr of detentions within pr. 36 months Detentions ≥ 2 detentions 1 No
Detention HRS = 5 points * LRS = all criteria * SRS = not HRS or LRS
Paris MOU on Port State Control
Company performanceCompany Performance Formula: • Taking into account detention and deficiency
history of all ships in the (ISM) company’s fleet• Calculated daily over a 36 month period• ISM deficiencies 5 points. Others 1 point• Refusal of access (banning): above average
detention index• Performance: high, medium, low, very low
Only possible if
no banning of any
of the ships in
last 36 months
NIR: SRP Inspections IntervalsHRS
SRS
LRS
Inspection Window
5th to 6th
month
24th to 36th
month
10th to 12th
month
NIR: Inspection Priority
Priority II
Ship may be inspected
Inspection Window
Priority I
Ship must be inspected
Timeline for any Ship Risk Profile
Overriding Factors
Unexpected Factors
Priority I
Priority IIBut…
If not inspected within Window, ship becomes
... MS still may
inspect outside the
regime!
NIR: Refusal of Access (Banning)
36 months 24 months 12 months Today
Detained 3 or more times
Detained 3 or more times
OR… • Jump detentions• Fail to call to agreed repair yard
Multiple Banning (Example for Black Flag, for Grey Flag is 2 yrs)
3yrs
3yrs
D D
Ban Ban Ban
Ban can be lifted after 3 months
Ship Banned 2nd time after 3 detentions
in 3 yearsBan can be lifted after 12 months
Ship Banned 3rd time if detained
Ban can be lifted after 24 months if:
• White Flag • EU RO• HP CompanyOr Permanent Ban
D D D
Ship Banned 1st time after 3 detentions
in 3 years
D
Permanent BanPermanent Banned
if detained
Reporting Obligations 72H Before ETA if eligible for Expanded Inspection
24H Before ETA for every ship
ATA and ATD within a reasonable time
Contact• Secretariat of the Paris
MoU on Port State Control P.O.Box 90653
2509 LR The Hague The Netherlands
• www.parismou.org
• secretariat@parismou.org
top related