rootstocks chapter 4 davies and albrigo. seedling trees problems –protracted juvenility thorns...

Rootstocks

Chapter 4

Davies and Albrigo

Seedling Trees

• Problems

–Protracted Juvenility

•Thorns

•Non-precocious

–Soil related

Advantages of Budlings

• Best scion and best stock

• 20 horticultural characteristics

–Tree vigor

–Rooting depth

–Freeze tolerance

–Soil adaptation to high salinity

More Rootstock Influences

–Resistance to nematodes, foot rot, citrus blight

–Fruit yield, size, texture, internal quality

–Maturity date

• Study Table 4.1

Rough Lemon

• Citrus jambhiri - NE India

• Polyembryony

• For deep infertile sand (FL ridge)

• Susceptibility to blight

• Lack of freeze tolerance

• High yields (80 - 100 tons / Ha)

Nucellar Embryony

Apomixisdevelopment of an embryo without the fusion of

male and female gametes. Polyembryony

occurrence of more than one embryo in a seed. Nucellar embryony

embryos form from nucellar tissue.

Nucellar embryony in citrus means that most embryos are vegetative not zygotic.

They are produced from nucellar tissue and are therefore clones of the mother tree.Pollination is needed to trigger nucellar development .

Nucellar polyembryony in Citrus

Nucellar Embryony

Nucellar embryos begin development as soon as pollination occurs while zygotic embryos take four weeks to develop; thus, nucellar embryos crowd out the zygotic embryos.There are various degrees of nucellar embryony.Some cultivars produce only nucellar embryos, and some vary in the percentage of nucellar embryos. Three citrus types produce monoembryonic and therefore zygotic seed;

‘Temple tangelo’‘Clementine’ tangerineShaddock, Citrus grandis (pomelo)

Implications of nucellar embryony.

Rootstocks such as 'Rough Lemon', 'Sour Orange', and P. trifoliata can be produced true-to-type from seed. Virus can be eliminated from infected clones.However, because nucellar seedlings are juvenile it takes a long time to obtain productive clones.These can then be propagated by budding from the indexed nucellar mother tree. Breeding of citrus is made difficult because of the difficulty obtaining genetically variable populations.

More Rough Lemon

• Root depth 4.6 m (drought tolerant)

• Wide range of pH.• Tolerant to –Tristeza (CTV)–Citrus exocortis viroid (CEV)–Citrus xyloporosis viroid

More Rough Lemon

• Highly susceptible to– foot rot–burrowing nematodes–blight (unknown cause)

• Poor quality fruit–‘Valencia’/ RL = 11.4 %–‘Valencia’/ SO = 13.2 %

More Rough Lemon

• Fruit characteristics

– Thick Peel

– “Puffy”

–Regreening

–Not good enough for fresh mkt.

–Higher prodn of kg-solids

Kg Solids (Pounds-solids)

• Function of

–Yield

–Juice content

–Total Soluble Solids (TSS)

Sour Orange (C. aurantium)

• Most widely planted stock in the world.

–Scions of SO - moderate vigor

–Slower than scions of RL but not dwarfed.

More Sour Orange

• Higher TSS per fruit, but kg-solids are lower than RL, CM, and CV on sandy soils.

• Produces deep, moderately branched root system.

• Scion vigor better on fertile soils.• Used on heavy poorly drained soils.

Does well on high pH soil.

SO Freeze Hardiness

• Cultivars on SO equal to:

–Cleo, trifoliata, and citrumelo

• Superior to lemon types and citranges.

• Does not regrow as rapidly as lemon types after freeze.

Sour Orange and Soil Prob.

• No problem with

–Xyloporosis

–Phytophthora foot rot

• Susceptible to

–Burrowing nematodes

–Citrus nematodes

Fruit Quality on SO

• Fruit size smaller than on RL, but larger than on Cleo.

• TSS and TA are high thus preferred stock in:

–LRGV, Indian River, and Spain.

• Grapefruit Lower height/ diameter ratio than on Cleo.

More Fruit Quality - SO

• High TA may delay maturity.

• If TSS limiting (like in ‘Hamlin’) then SO advances maturity.

• TSS may by 1.5% higher than RL.

• High TSS + phytophthora resist. makes SO popular in tropics.

Splitting AO

• Scions on SO have smooth, thin peel.

• Thus excessive splitting can occur more frequently than on Cleo.

• Problem on sw oranges and mandarins - not on GF, Temple.

Sour Orange Selections

• ‘Bittersweet’

–More tolerant to phytophthora

• C. taiwanica tolerant to CTV ??

• ‘Bittersweet’ higher yields than C. taiwanica.

‘Cleopatra’ Mandarin

• C. reticulata - minor importance in world.

• Large and mod. vigorous trees• Deep, densely branched root sys• Yield sw oranges intermediate

between RL and SO. • Comparable yields of SO.

More Cleo

• Less precocity - takes 10 - 15 yr

• As freeze hardy as most and better than the lemons or ‘Carrizo’ Citrange.

• Adapted to wide variety of soils. Resistant to high salinity, high pH, and calcareous soils.

Cleo’s BIG Advantage

• Tolerant of CTV, CEV, and Xyloporosis.

• But it is susceptible to:

–Burrowing and Citrus Nematodes.

• Reaches 12 - 15 yrs before blight kills it.

Cleo Fruit Quality

• Fruit size smaller.

• Fruit quality between SO and RL.

• Peel smooth and thin - more splitting in oranges but not important in grapefruit.

• Excellent stock for: ‘Temple’ and mandarin hybrids.

Citrus macrophylla

• Very similar to lemons and limes.• Lemons and limes do very well on

this stock.• Big problem - freeze sensitive.• Sw oranges and GF very large but

thick peel.• Adapted to cool, dry climates.

Trifoliate Orange

• Widely used for satsumas and oranges in Japan, China, Argentina, and Australia.

• Dwarfing has been due to CEV.

• CEV inoculations induces dwarf

Freeze Hardiness of Trifoliate Orange

• Stock very hardy.

• But scions become quiescent later than on SO and RL.

• Scions not affected by CTV or CEV, but taken out by blight.

• Better on heavy poorly drained soil.

Fruit Quality on Trifoliate

• Usually small fruit prob because large crops and smaller root sys.

• Excellent quality, similar to those on SO and RL.

• Fruit peel smooth and thin.

Citranges

• Sw. orange x trifoliate hybrids.• Several tested:–‘Rusk’, ‘Morton’, ‘Savage’,

‘Benton’, C-35, ‘Carrizo’, and ‘Troyer’ –‘Troyer’ in CA & ‘Carrizo’ in FL

• Scion over grows stocks.

‘Swingle’ Citrumelos

• ‘Swingle’ citrumelo is most widely grown stock in FL.

• Released in 1974 - now world .

• Not affected by CTV, CEV, or xyloporosis.

• More freeze hardy than RL or ‘Carrizo’. Same as SO.

2002 2003 % Sol. Solids % Acid  (lb/tree)C-22 505.5 605.5 8.65 0.92C-146 412.0 558.0 8.85 0.92C-57 385.0 576.0 8.65 0.89Af. Shad. 321.0 568.0 8.85 0.95Sour 362.5 423.3 9.30 0.91Troyer 255.0 489.0 8.40 0.81Gou Tou 164.0 418.5 8.00 0.81

Unpublished results of TAMUK Citrus Center 2003/2004

Copyright 2004- TAMUK

Sizes• C-22

Extra-fancy 56- 3.15% 48- 13.64% 40- 21.03% 36- 20.62%

Total Weight: 8051 Lb • Sour

Extra-fancy 56- 1.46% 48- 5.92% 40- 13.50% 36- 15.53%

Total Weight: 4186 Lb Copyright 2004- TAMUK

THE END