rim conference
Post on 14-Jun-2015
272 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
peter blackpete.black@qut.edu.au
http://www.freedomtodiffer.com/
law 2.0
the challenge of user-generated and peer-produced networks, content and
culture
transformed
communication
education
government
media
business
culture
web 2.0
physical + virtual
the law lags behind
almost always
changing circumstances
change circumstances
challenge
new cultural paradigm
innovation
define, create, use and re-use information
web 2.0
copyrightdefamation
privacy
intermediary
new lawlaw 2.0
<1> web 2.0
second generation
interactivity
upload + download
‘participatory web’
web 2.0 landscapeprepared ross dawson, chairman of future exploration
network and licensed under a creative commons attribution-share alike version 2.5 license
broadband
91%
web 1.0 = dial upweb 2.0 = 1 megabit of
bandwidthweb 3.0 = 10 megabits of
bandwidth
youtube
web 2.0: the machine is us/ing us
by michael wesch
licensed under a creative commons attribution-noncommercial-share alike 3.0 license
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLlGopyXT_g
we need to rethink a few things
<2> the law of information
tension
<a> copyright
lag behind digital culture
preserve business models
different
incompatible
remix
free
non-commercial
remix without technology does not copy
digital ageweb 2.0 world
remix it with copying
cultural remix
mashup
‘remix culture’
amateur creators
a right to mashup+ remix material
challenge
from the pastto create the future
preventor
change?
culture of creativity + innovation
free culture
licensed under a creative commons attribution-share alike version 1.0 license
remix is unlawful
presumptively illegal
some examples
the grey album
the grey video
downloaded from youtubehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zJqihkLcGc
presumptively illegal
dean gay presents american edit
new generation
anything wrong?
robbed?
ripped off?
bad thing?
value?
power to remix
jibjab’s ‘this land’
downloaded from youtubehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8Q-sRdV7SY
anyone
piracy ad
downloaded from youtubehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fr-vvKOB0lk
fair dealingfair use
problem
starting point
unlawful
not punish ordinary use
remix is ordinary use
especially for digital natives
change
remix rights
creative commons
downloaded from http://creativecommons.org/presskit
‘this is a battle over creativity, do we want a world where the
law criminalizes that?’
<b> defamation
always
different
two fundamental ways
world at large
we are all publishers + broadcasters now
record
searchable
anonymityjurisdictional difficulties
hard + expensive
new cultural norms
new way
on the internet
pre-emptive
digital footprint
free speech
count the lies
screen capture of http://www.mccainpedia.org/index.php/Count_the_Lies
notice + takedown
netiquette
reflect
codifying
immunity
<c> privacy
digital natives
analogue refugees
different conception
new digital paparazzi
don’t have to be a celebrity
mobile phone camera
your own digital paparazzi
stephanie ricedownloaded from Somebody Think of the Children
http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/officer-please-stephanie-rice-facebook-shots-too-hot-for-swimming-australia/
digital world
completely comfortable
strange + confronting world
real world
share
personal/private
think back …
challenge
what is private?
flexible, permission based
controlwhat we disclose + to whom
<3> intermediaries
provider of web 2.0 platforms
web 2.0 landscapeprepared ross dawson, chairman of future exploration
network and licensed under a creative commons attribution-share alike version 2.5 license
easier to identifydeeper pockets
intermediaries should not be liable
for the online actions of their users
too many userstoo much content
encouraging internet innovation
perverse incentive
co-regulation
general immunity with system of self-regulation
1. notice 2. logging
3. take down procedure
balance
antecedents in existing legal frameworks
<4> the way forward
promotes creativity
doesn’t criminalise ordinary usedoesn’t penalise innovation
new law
law 2.0
peter blackpete.black@qut.edu.au
http://www.freedomtodiffer.com/
top related