responsiveness to intervention & school-wide positive behavior support
Post on 01-Jan-2016
50 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Responsiveness to Intervention & School-wide Positive Behavior Support
George SugaiOSEP Center on PBIS
Center for Behavioral Education & ResearchUniversity of Connecticut
Sep 22 2010
www.pbis.org www.cber.org www.swis.org
My Worry“Teaching” by Getting Tough
Runyon: “I hate this f____ing school, & you’re a dumbf_____.”
Teacher: “That is disrespectful language. I’m sending you to the office so you’ll learn never to say those words again….starting now!”
Immediate & seductive solution….”Get Tough!”
• Clamp down & increase monitoring• Re-re-re-review rules• Extend continuum & consistency of
consequences• Establish “bottom line”
...Predictable individual response
Reactive responses are predictable….
When we experience aversive situation, we want select interventions that produce immediate relief– Remove student
– Remove ourselves
– Modify physical environment
– Assign responsibility for change to student &/or others
When behavior doesn’t improve, we “Get Tougher!”
• Zero tolerance policies
• Increased surveillance
• Increased suspension & expulsion
• In-service training by expert
• Alternative programming
…..Predictable systems response!
Erroneous assumption that student…
• Is inherently “bad”
• Will learn more appropriate behavior through increased use of “aversives”
• Will be better tomorrow…….
But….false sense of safety/security!
• Fosters environments of control• Triggers & reinforces antisocial behavior • Shifts accountability away from school• Devalues child-adult relationship• Weakens relationship between academic
& social behavior programming
Science of behavior has taught us that students….
• Are NOT born with “bad behaviors”• Do NOT learn when presented
contingent aversive consequences
……..Do learn better ways of behaving by being taught directly & receiving positive feedback
VIOLENCE PREVENTION
• Surgeon General’s Report on Youth Violence (2001)
• Coordinated Social Emotional & Learning (Greenberg et al., 2003)
• Center for Study & Prevention of Violence (2006)
• White House Conference on School Violence (2006)
• Positive, predictable school-wide climate
• High rates of academic & social success
• Formal social skills instruction
• Positive active supervision & reinforcement
• Positive adult role models
• Multi-component, multi-year school-family-community effort
9
PURPOSE
Describe school-wide positive
behavior supports (aka PBIS) in
Response to Intervention context.
SWPBS Features
SWPBS is
12
SYST
EMS
PRACTICES
DATASupportingStaff Behavior
SupportingStudent Behavior
OUTCOMES
Supporting Social Competence &Academic Achievement
SupportingDecisionMaking
IntegratedElements
13
Stolen w/ permission from MN Jan 28, 2010
OUTCOMES
SYSTEMSSupporting
Staff Behavior & Implementation Fidelity
DATASupportingDecisionMaking
PRACTICESEvidence-based,
preventive
Supporting Social
Competence &
Academic Achievement
14
Primary Prevention:School-/Classroom-Wide Systems for
All Students,Staff, & Settings
Secondary Prevention:Specialized Group
Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior
Tertiary Prevention:Specialized
IndividualizedSystems for Students
with High-Risk Behavior
~80% of Students
~15%
~5%
CONTINUUM OFSCHOOL-WIDE
INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR
SUPPORT
ALL
SOME
FEW
15
RtI
16
Responsiveness to Intervention
1-5% 1-5%
5-10% 5-10%
80-90% 80-90%
Intensive, Individual Interventions• Individual Students• Assessment-based
• High Intensity
Intensive, Individual Interventions• Individual Students• Assessment-based
• Intense, durable procedures
Targeted Group Interventions• Some students (at-risk)
• High efficiency• Rapid response
Targeted Group Interventions• Some students (at-risk)
• High efficiency• Rapid response
Universal Interventions• All students
• Preventive, proactive
Universal Interventions• All settings, all students• Preventive, proactive
Responsiveness to Intervention
Academic Systems Behavioral Systems
Circa 199618
All
Some
FewRTI
Continuum of Support for
ALL
Dec 7, 2007
Continuum of Support for ALL
Dec 7, 2007
Science
Soc Studies
Reading
Math
Soc skills
Basketball
Spanish
Label behavior…not people 20
Continuum of Support for ALL
Dec 7, 2007
Prob Sol.
Coop play
Adult rel.
Anger man.
Attend.
Peer interac
Ind. play
Label behavior…not people 21
~80% of Students
~5%
ESTABLISHING CONTINUUM of SWPBS
SECONDARY PREVENTION• Check in/out• Targeted social skills
instruction• Peer-based supports• Social skills club•
TERTIARY PREVENTION• Function-based support• Wraparound• Person-centered planning• •
PRIMARY PREVENTION• Teach SW expectations• Proactive SW discipline• Positive reinforcement• Effective instruction• Parent engagement•
~15%
Classroom
SWPBSPractices
Non-classroom Family
Student
School-w
ide
• Smallest #• Evidence-based
• Biggest, durable effect
23
Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., & Anderson, C. M. (in press). Examining the evidence base for school-wide positive behavior support. Focus on Exceptionality.
www.pbis.org
“Is SWPBS evidence-based practice?”
24
SCHOOL-WIDE1.Leadership team
2.Behavior purpose statement
3.Set of positive expectations & behaviors
4.Procedures for teaching SW & classroom-wide expected behavior
5.Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior
6.Continuum of procedures for discouraging rule violations
7.Procedures for on-going data-based monitoring & evaluation
EVIDENCE-BASED
INTERVENTIONPRACTICES
CLASSROOM1.All school-wide2.Maximum structure & predictability in routines & environment3.Positively stated expectations posted, taught, reviewed, prompted, & supervised.4.Maximum engagement through high rates of opportunities to respond, delivery of evidence-based instructional curriculum & practices5.Continuum of strategies to acknowledge displays of appropriate behavior.6.Continuum of strategies for responding to inappropriate behavior.
INDIVIDUAL STUDENT1.Behavioral competence at school & district levels
2.Function-based behavior support planning
3.Team- & data-based decision making
4.Comprehensive person-centered planning & wraparound processes
5.Targeted social skills & self-management instruction
6. Individualized instructional & curricular accommodations
NONCLASSROOM1.Positive expectations & routines taught & encouraged
2.Active supervision by all staff (Scan, move, interact)
3.Precorrections & reminders
4.Positive reinforcement
FAMILY ENGAGEMENT1.Continuum of positive behavior support for all families
2.Frequent, regular positive contacts, communications, & acknowledgements
3.Formal & active participation & involvement as equal partner
4.Access to system of integrated school & community resources
25
Agreements
Team
Data-based Action Plan
ImplementationEvaluation
GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS: “Getting Started”
26
Funding Visibility PolicyPoliticalSupport
Training CoachingBehavioral Expertise
Evaluation
LEADERSHIP TEAM(Coordination)
Local School/District Implementation Demonstrations
SWPBS Implementation
Blueprint
www.pbis.org
27
Teaching Matrix
SETTING
All Settings
Hallways Playgrounds CafeteriaLibrary/
Computer Lab
Assembly Bus
Respect Ourselves
Be on task.
Give your best effort.
Be prepared.
Walk. Have a plan.
Eat all your food.Select healthy foods.
Study, read,
compute.
Sit in one spot.
Watch for your stop.
Respect Others
Be kind.Hands/feet
to self.Help/share
with others.
Use normal voice
volume.Walk to right.
Play safe.Include others.Share
equipment.
Practice good table manners
Whisper.Return books.
Listen/watch.Use
appropriate applause.
Use a quiet voice.
Stay in your seat.
Respect Property
Recycle.Clean up after self.
Pick up litter.
Maintain physical space.
Use equipment properly.
Put litter in garbage can.
Replace trays &
utensils.Clean up
eating area.
Push in chairs.Treat books
carefully.
Pick up.Treat chairs appropriately
.
Wipe your feet.Sit
appropriately.
Exp
ecta
tions 1. S
OCIAL SKILL2. NATURAL
CONTEXT
3. BEHAVIOR
EXAMPLES
Family Teaching
Matrix
SETTING
At homeMorning Routine
HomeworkMeal Times
In Car Play Bedtime
Respect Ourselves
Respect Others
Respect Property
Exp
ecta
tions 1. S
OCIAL SKILL
2. NATURAL
CONTEXT
3. BEHAVIOR
EXAMPLES
29
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
94-95 95-96 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06
To
tal O
DR
s
Academic Years
FRMS Total Office Discipline Referrals
SUSTAINED IMPACTPre
Post
Sustained impact is real
success
30
ODR Admin. BenefitSpringfield MS, MD
2001-2002 2277
2002-2003 1322
= 955 42% improvement
= 14,325 min. @15 min.
= 238.75 hrs
= 40 days Admin. time
Increased minutes for
administrators be instructional
leaders
31
ODR Instruc. BenefitSpringfield MS, MD
2001-2002 2277
2002-2003 1322
= 955 42% improvement
= 42,975 min. @ 45 min.
= 716.25 hrs
= 119 days Instruc. time
Increased minutes for academic
engagement & opportunities to respond
32
NC Positive Behavior Support Initiative
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.0050
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
Reading
Linear (Reading)
ODRs
EO
G R
eadi
ng
rxy = -.44(n = 36)
Bob Algozzine
Schools w/ Low ODRs & High
Academic Outcomes
Office Discipline Referrals per 100 Students
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f S
tud
ents
Mee
tin
g S
tate
Aca
dem
ic
Sta
nd
ard
PBIS in North Carolina
Elementary School Suspension Rate
PBIS in Virginia34
Elementary School
PBIS in Virginia
Improvements in behavior can be associated with improvements in
academic outcomes
35
PBIS in Vermont
Decreasing high risk behavior by using evidence-based curriculum (RtI)
36
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Mea
n P
ropo
rtio
n of
S
tude
nts
Met SET (N = 23) Not Met SET (N =12)
Central Illinois Elem, Middle SchoolsTriangle Summary 03-04
6+ ODR
2-5 ODR
0-1 ODR
84% 58%
11%
22%
05%20%
37
Effective Social & AcademicSchool Culture
Common Vision/Values
Common Language
Common Experience
Kids Benefit
Effective Practice
top related