residential annual validation suspension update
Post on 03-Jan-2016
26 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
1
Residential Annual Validation Suspension Update
Presented by ERCOT Staff to
Profiling Working Group
09/29/2005
2
Residential Survey Update
• Survey was mailed on August 30, 2005
• Response rate is 11.0% as of 09/16/2005 (about the same as the pilot survey)
• Response data is being provided by the Market Research firm
• Next steps• Response validation• Statistical Assignment Algorithm development• Apply algorithm to all ESIIDS with Profile Assignment Changes and
determine accuracy
• Algorithm will also be applied to evaluate overall assignment accuracy and the accuracy impact of proposed changes for Annual Validation 2006
3
Data Aggregation Test Runs
• Test environment has been created and snapshot of Production Lodestar taken as of 07/30/2005
• Stratified Sample of 30 trade days has been selected• 3 Strata based on difference between RESLOWR and RESHIWR profile• 10 days per stratum
• Baseline Data Aggregation Runs have been completed and statistics captured
• Profile IDs have been updated (old ones saved to a temporary table to allow us to revert back to original assignments) to reflect Annual Validation
• 578,000 Residential Assignment changes
• Next steps• Data Aggregation Re-Runs to capture the affect to the assignment changes• Analyze and summarize differences
• Will revert assignments to allow for testing of revised assignment algorithm(s)
• Will perform similar analysis on Business to obtain Annual Validation impacts for Residential only, Business only and Both
4
Statistical Assignment Algorithm
• Regression between actual meter readings for a premise and the RESHIWR and RESLOWR profile consumption for the same time periods
• Use reads during shoulder and winter months for several years
• Assign to profile with a better fit
• Omit reads during periods of very low use (no/low occupancy)
• Omit outlier reads and require some reads to exceed a minimum kWh/day threshold in order to assign RESHIWR
• Parameters of assignment process determined from use of Residential Survey response data
5
Statistical ApproachRESHIWR Example
6
Statistical ApproachRESLOWR Example
7
Statistical ApproachMiss-assignment Example
8
IMPACT OF PROFILE ASSIGNMENT MISCLASSIFICATION
• PROFILE ASSIGNMENT ERRORS CREATE TWO TYPES OF LOAD PROFILE ESTIMATION DIFFERENCES
• ASSIGNMENT OF BILLING KWH TO THE DAYS WITHIN THE BILLING PERIOD
• (RESHIWR assigns more kWh than RESLOWR to cold days)
• ASSIGNMENT OF DAILY KWH TO THE INTERVALS WITHIN THE DAY
• (RESHIWR assigns more kWh to morning intervals)
9
wzone=COAST gr oup=2004/ 05
mon_ pct _ l o mon_ pct _ hi
Dai l y Per cent
0. 00
0. 01
0. 02
0. 03
0. 04
0. 05
0. 06
0. 07
0. 08
usedat e
050104 060104 070104 080104 090104 100104 110104 120104 010105 020105 030105 040105 050105
10
wzone=COAST gr oup=2004/ 05
Hi / Lo Rat i o
0. 5
0. 6
0. 7
0. 8
0. 9
1. 0
1. 1
1. 2
1. 3
1. 4
1. 5
1. 6
1. 7
1. 8
1. 9
2. 0
usedat e
050104 060104 070104 080104 090104 100104 110104 120104 010105 020105 030105 040105 050105
11
Coast ResidentialProfile Comparison
COAST - November 22, 20035th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 0.72676
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
COAST - October 22, 200420th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 0.91584
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
COAST - November 13, 200340th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 0.82226
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
COAST - October 18, 200360th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 1.00096
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
COAST - December 19, 200380th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 1.13726
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
COAST - October 27, 200395th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 1.48942
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
12
COAST HI/LO RATIO INTERVAL PERCENT OF MONTHLY KWH OCT 2004 – APR 2005
wzone=COAST gr oup=2004/ 05
FREQUENCY
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
hi _ l o_ r at i o_ r MI DPOI NT
0. 5 0. 6 0. 7 0. 8 0. 9 1. 0 1. 1 1. 2 1. 3 1. 4 1. 5 1. 6 1. 7 1. 8 1. 9 2. 0 2. 1 2. 2
hi_lo_ratio_r Frequency Percent
0.5 127 0.62
0.6 1161 5.71
0.7 1828 8.98
0.8 2790 13.71
0.9 4087 20.09
1 3453 16.97
1.1 1945 9.56
1.2 1277 6.28
1.3 1075 5.28
1.4 837 4.11
1.5 641 3.15
1.6 455 2.24
1.7 291 1.43
1.8 173 0.85
1.9 114 0.56
2 60 0.29
2.1 21 0.10
2.2 9 0.04
2.3 4 0.02
50% of intervals have > 15% difference
13
wzone=EAST gr oup=2004/ 05
mon_ pct _ l o mon_ pct _ hi
Dai l y Per cent
0. 00
0. 01
0. 02
0. 03
0. 04
0. 05
0. 06
0. 07
0. 08
usedat e
050104 060104 070104 080104 090104 100104 110104 120104 010105 020105 030105 040105 050105
14
wzone=EAST gr oup=2004/ 05
Hi / Lo Rat i o
0. 5
0. 6
0. 7
0. 8
0. 9
1. 0
1. 1
1. 2
1. 3
1. 4
1. 5
1. 6
1. 7
1. 8
1. 9
2. 0
usedat e
050104 060104 070104 080104 090104 100104 110104 120104 010105 020105 030105 040105 050105
15
East ResidentialProfile Comparison
EAST - November 22, 20035th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 0.73126
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
EAST - October 22, 200420th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 0.91931
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
EAST - November 13, 200340th Percentile HI/LO Ratio =0.81454
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
EAST - October 18, 200360th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 1.00092
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
EAST - December 19, 200380th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 1.10533
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
EAST - October 27, 200395th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 1.26780
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
16
EAST HI/LO RATIO INTERVAL PERCENT OF MONTHLY KWH OCT 2004 – APR 2005
wzone=EAST gr oup=2004/ 05
FREQUENCY
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
hi _ l o_ r at i o_ r MI DPOI NT
0. 5 0. 6 0. 7 0. 8 0. 9 1. 0 1. 1 1. 2 1. 3 1. 4 1. 5 1. 6 1. 7 1. 8 1. 9 2. 0 2. 1 2. 2
hi_lo_ratio_r Frequency Percent
0.5 235 1.15
0.6 1202 5.91
0.7 1801 8.85
0.8 3177 15.61
0.9 3876 19.05
1 3106 15.26
1.1 1952 9.59
1.2 1266 6.22
1.3 960 4.72
1.4 822 4.04
1.5 658 3.23
1.6 507 2.49
1.7 387 1.90
1.8 184 0.90
1.9 114 0.56
2 68 0.33
2.1 22 0.11
2.2 10 0.05
2.3 1 0.00
50% of intervals have > 15% difference
17
wzone=FWEST gr oup=2004/ 05
mon_ pct _ l o mon_ pct _ hi
Dai l y Per cent
0. 00
0. 01
0. 02
0. 03
0. 04
0. 05
0. 06
0. 07
0. 08
usedat e
050104 060104 070104 080104 090104 100104 110104 120104 010105 020105 030105 040105 050105
18
wzone=FWEST gr oup=2004/ 05
Hi / Lo Rat i o
0. 5
0. 6
0. 7
0. 8
0. 9
1. 0
1. 1
1. 2
1. 3
1. 4
1. 5
1. 6
1. 7
1. 8
1. 9
2. 0
usedat e
050104 060104 070104 080104 090104 100104 110104 120104 010105 020105 030105 040105 050105
19
Fwest ResidentialProfile Comparison
FWEST - October 22, 200420th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 0.73991
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
FWEST - December 19, 200380th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 1.10325
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
FWEST - November 13, 200340th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 1.08446
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
FWEST - October 27, 200395th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 1.36161
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
FWEST - November 22, 20035th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 0.73049
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
FWEST - October 18, 200360th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 0.95385
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
20
FWEST HI/LO RATIO INTERVAL PERCENT OF MONTHLY KWH OCT 2004 – APR 2005
wzone=FWEST gr oup=2004/ 05
FREQUENCY
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
hi _ l o_ r at i o_ r MI DPOI NT
0. 5 0. 6 0. 7 0. 8 0. 9 1. 0 1. 1 1. 2 1. 3 1. 4 1. 5 1. 6 1. 7 1. 8 1. 9 2. 0 2. 1 2. 2
hi_lo_ratio_r Frequency Percent
0.5 126 0.62
0.6 1211 5.95
0.7 2720 13.37
0.8 3667 18.02
0.9 2802 13.77
1 2614 12.85
1.1 1922 9.45
1.2 1586 7.79
1.3 1110 5.46
1.4 803 3.95
1.5 579 2.85
1.6 397 1.95
1.7 329 1.62
1.8 216 1.06
1.9 137 0.67
2 72 0.35
2.1 34 0.17
2.2 22 0.11
2.3 1 0.00
51% of intervals have > 15% difference
21
wzone=NCENT gr oup=2004/ 05
mon_ pct _ l o mon_ pct _ hi
Dai l y Per cent
0. 00
0. 01
0. 02
0. 03
0. 04
0. 05
0. 06
0. 07
0. 08
usedat e
050104 060104 070104 080104 090104 100104 110104 120104 010105 020105 030105 040105 050105
22
wzone=NCENT gr oup=2004/ 05
Hi / Lo Rat i o
0. 5
0. 6
0. 7
0. 8
0. 9
1. 0
1. 1
1. 2
1. 3
1. 4
1. 5
1. 6
1. 7
1. 8
1. 9
2. 0
usedat e
050104 060104 070104 080104 090104 100104 110104 120104 010105 020105 030105 040105 050105
23
Ncent ResidentialProfile Comparison
NCENT - November 22, 20035th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 0.70873
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
NCENT - October 22, 200420th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 0.88097
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
NCENT - November 13, 200340th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 0.98041
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
NCENT - October 18, 200360th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 1.00626
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
NCENT - December 19, 200380th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 1.08476
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
NCENT - October 27, 200395th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 1.28721
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
24
NCENT HI/LO RATIO INTERVAL PERCENT OF MONTHLY KWH OCT 2004 – APR 2005
wzone=NCENT gr oup=2004/ 05
FREQUENCY
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
hi _ l o_ r at i o_ r MI DPOI NT
0. 5 0. 6 0. 7 0. 8 0. 9 1. 0 1. 1 1. 2 1. 3 1. 4 1. 5 1. 6 1. 7 1. 8 1. 9 2. 0 2. 1 2. 2
hi_lo_ratio_r Frequency Percent
0.4 15 0.07
0.5 385 1.89
0.6 1201 5.90
0.7 1815 8.92
0.8 3179 15.62
0.9 3707 18.22
1 2965 14.57
1.1 1963 9.65
1.2 1408 6.92
1.3 1101 5.41
1.4 868 4.27
1.5 630 3.10
1.6 436 2.14
1.7 310 1.52
1.8 178 0.87
1.9 110 0.54
2 37 0.18
2.1 27 0.13
2.2 13 0.06
50% of intervals have > 15% difference
25
wzone=NORTH gr oup=2004/ 05
mon_ pct _ l o mon_ pct _ hi
Dai l y Per cent
0. 00
0. 01
0. 02
0. 03
0. 04
0. 05
0. 06
0. 07
0. 08
usedat e
050104 060104 070104 080104 090104 100104 110104 120104 010105 020105 030105 040105 050105
26
wzone=NORTH gr oup=2004/ 05
Hi / Lo Rat i o
0. 5
0. 6
0. 7
0. 8
0. 9
1. 0
1. 1
1. 2
1. 3
1. 4
1. 5
1. 6
1. 7
1. 8
1. 9
2. 0
usedat e
050104 060104 070104 080104 090104 100104 110104 120104 010105 020105 030105 040105 050105
27
North ResidentialProfile Comparison
NORTH - November 22, 20035th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 0.68039
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
NORTH - October 22, 200420th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 0.8288
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
NORTH - November 13, 200340th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 1.03304
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
NORTH - October 18, 200360th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 1.01697
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
NORTH - December 19, 200380th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 1.03070
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
IntervalL
oad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
NORTH - October 27, 200395th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 1.25366
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
28
NORTH HI/LO RATIO INTERVAL PERCENT OF MONTHLY KWH OCT 2004 – APR 2005
wzone=NORTH gr oup=2004/ 05
FREQUENCY
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
hi _ l o_ r at i o_ r MI DPOI NT
0. 5 0. 6 0. 7 0. 8 0. 9 1. 0 1. 1 1. 2 1. 3 1. 4 1. 5 1. 6 1. 7 1. 8 1. 9 2. 0 2. 1 2. 2
hi_lo_ratio_r Frequency Percent
0.4 28 0.14
0.5 417 2.05
0.6 1197 5.88
0.7 2185 10.74
0.8 3132 15.39
0.9 3318 16.31
1 2609 12.82
1.1 2055 10.10
1.2 1615 7.94
1.3 1036 5.09
1.4 1047 5.15
1.5 601 2.95
1.6 495 2.43
1.7 350 1.72
1.8 171 0.84
1.9 55 0.27
2 23 0.11
2.1 14 0.07
50% of intervals have > 15% difference
29
wzone=SCENT gr oup=2004/ 05
mon_ pct _ l o mon_ pct _ hi
Dai l y Per cent
0. 00
0. 01
0. 02
0. 03
0. 04
0. 05
0. 06
0. 07
0. 08
usedat e
050104 060104 070104 080104 090104 100104 110104 120104 010105 020105 030105 040105 050105
30
wzone=SCENT gr oup=2004/ 05
Hi / Lo Rat i o
0. 5
0. 6
0. 7
0. 8
0. 9
1. 0
1. 1
1. 2
1. 3
1. 4
1. 5
1. 6
1. 7
1. 8
1. 9
2. 0
usedat e
050104 060104 070104 080104 090104 100104 110104 120104 010105 020105 030105 040105 050105
31
Scent ResidentialProfile Comparison
SCENT - November 22, 20035th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 0.82528
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
SCENT - October 22, 200420th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 0.92427
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
SCENT - November 13, 200340th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 0.86686
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
SCENT - October 18, 200360th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 0.98235
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
SCENT - December 19, 200380th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 1.12072
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
IntervalL
oad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
SCENT - October 27, 200395th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 1.11453
0.0000.0020.0040.0060.0080.0100.0120.0140.0160.0180.020
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
32
SCENT HI/LO RATIO INTERVAL PERCENT OF MONTHLY KWH OCT 2004 – APR 2005
wzone=SCENT gr oup=2004/ 05
FREQUENCY
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
hi _ l o_ r at i o_ r MI DPOI NT
0. 5 0. 6 0. 7 0. 8 0. 9 1. 0 1. 1 1. 2 1. 3 1. 4 1. 5 1. 6 1. 7 1. 8 1. 9 2. 0 2. 1 2. 2
hi_lo_ratio_r Frequency Percent
0.5 2 0.01
0.6 186 0.91
0.7 1286 6.32
0.8 3173 15.59
0.9 5216 25.63
1 4340 21.33
1.1 2321 11.41
1.2 1562 7.68
1.3 945 4.64
1.4 596 2.93
1.5 304 1.49
1.6 195 0.96
1.7 116 0.57
1.8 66 0.32
1.9 29 0.14
2 11 0.05
40% of intervals have > 15% difference
33
wzone=SOUTH gr oup=2004/ 05
mon_ pct _ l o mon_ pct _ hi
Dai l y Per cent
0. 00
0. 01
0. 02
0. 03
0. 04
0. 05
0. 06
0. 07
0. 08
usedat e
050104 060104 070104 080104 090104 100104 110104 120104 010105 020105 030105 040105 050105
34
wzone=SOUTH gr oup=2004/ 05
Hi / Lo Rat i o
0. 5
0. 6
0. 7
0. 8
0. 9
1. 0
1. 1
1. 2
1. 3
1. 4
1. 5
1. 6
1. 7
1. 8
1. 9
2. 0
usedat e
050104 060104 070104 080104 090104 100104 110104 120104 010105 020105 030105 040105 050105
35
South ResidentialProfile Comparison
SOUTH - October 22, 200420th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 0.94302
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
SOUTH - November 22, 20035th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 0.82076
0.0000.0020.0040.0060.0080.0100.0120.0140.0160.0180.020
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
SOUTH - November 13, 200340th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 0.87601
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
SOUTH - October 18, 200360th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 0.97839
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
SOUTH - December 19, 200380th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 1.31871
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
SOUTH - October 27, 200395th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 1.60319
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
36
SOUTH HI/LO RATIO INTERVAL PERCENT OF MONTHLY KWH OCT 2004 – APR 2005
wzone=SOUTH gr oup=2004/ 05
FREQUENCY
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
hi _ l o_ r at i o_ r MI DPOI NT
0. 5 0. 6 0. 7 0. 8 0. 9 1. 0 1. 1 1. 2 1. 3 1. 4 1. 5 1. 6 1. 7 1. 8 1. 9 2. 0 2. 1 2. 2
hi_lo_ratio_r Frequency Percent
0.6 368 1.81
0.7 1400 6.88
0.8 2745 13.49
0.9 5147 25.29
1 4428 21.76
1.1 1987 9.77
1.2 1179 5.79
1.3 789 3.88
1.4 620 3.05
1.5 456 2.24
1.6 391 1.92
1.7 301 1.48
1.8 215 1.06
1.9 141 0.69
2 66 0.32
2.1 31 0.15
2.2 22 0.11
2.3 14 0.07
2.4 33 0.16
2.5 14 0.07
2.6 1 0.00
46% of intervals have > 15% difference
37
wzone=WEST gr oup=2004/ 05
mon_ pct _ l o mon_ pct _ hi
Dai l y Per cent
0. 00
0. 01
0. 02
0. 03
0. 04
0. 05
0. 06
0. 07
0. 08
usedat e
050104 060104 070104 080104 090104 100104 110104 120104 010105 020105 030105 040105 050105
38
wzone=WEST gr oup=2004/ 05
Hi / Lo Rat i o
0. 5
0. 6
0. 7
0. 8
0. 9
1. 0
1. 1
1. 2
1. 3
1. 4
1. 5
1. 6
1. 7
1. 8
1. 9
2. 0
usedat e
050104 060104 070104 080104 090104 100104 110104 120104 010105 020105 030105 040105 050105
39
West ResidentialProfile Comparison
WEST - October 22, 200420th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 0.78101
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
WEST - November 13, 200340th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 1.02573
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
WEST - November 22, 20035th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 0.67546
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
WEST - October 18, 200360th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 1.04567
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
WEST - December 19, 200380th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 1.18088
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
WEST - October 27, 200395th Percentile HI/LO Ratio = 1.35735
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93
Interval
Lo
ad
RESLOWR RESLOWR MISS-CLASSIFIED RESHIWR RESHIWR MISS-CLASSIFIED
40
WEST HI/LO RATIO INTERVAL PERCENT OF MONTHLY KWH OCT 2004 – APR 2005
wzone=WEST gr oup=2004/ 05
FREQUENCY
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
hi _ l o_ r at i o_ r MI DPOI NT
0. 5 0. 6 0. 7 0. 8 0. 9 1. 0 1. 1 1. 2 1. 3 1. 4 1. 5 1. 6 1. 7 1. 8 1. 9 2. 0 2. 1 2. 2
hi_lo_ratio_r Frequency Percent
0.4 1 0.00
0.5 221 1.09
0.6 1285 6.32
0.7 2464 12.11
0.8 3697 18.17
0.9 3189 15.67
1 2280 11.21
1.1 1943 9.55
1.2 1467 7.21
1.3 1057 5.19
1.4 791 3.89
1.5 571 2.81
1.6 456 2.24
1.7 355 1.74
1.8 212 1.04
1.9 169 0.83
2 109 0.54
2.1 41 0.20
2.2 26 0.13
2.3 13 0.06
2.4 1 0.00
49% of intervals have > 15% difference
41
Residential ProfileComparison Summary
COMPARISON OF RESHIWR VS RESLOWR PROFILESMEAN ABSOLUTE PERCENT DIFFERENCE
INTERVAL AS A PERCENT OF DAY DAY AS A PERCENT OF MONTH INTERVAL AS A PERCENT OF MONTH
SHOULDER SUMMER WINTER SHOULDER SUMMER WINTER SHOULDER SUMMER WINTER
COAST 2001/02 9.1% 4.2% 15.5% 15.5% 1.5% 20.6% 18.1% 4.5% 26.2%2002/03 9.6% 4.1% 14.5% 13.7% 1.4% 21.6% 16.7% 4.5% 25.8%2003/04 8.3% 4.1% 14.6% 12.0% 1.2% 19.7% 15.1% 4.3% 24.4%2004/05 8.8% 4.1% 13.0% 13.2% 1.3% 24.8% 16.3% 4.4% 27.8%
EAST 2001/02 13.1% 4.8% 21.0% 15.1% 1.5% 16.7% 20.3% 5.1% 27.4%2002/03 14.3% 4.6% 19.6% 13.2% 1.4% 17.5% 19.7% 4.9% 26.3%2003/04 12.2% 4.6% 20.5% 12.0% 1.4% 16.3% 17.9% 4.9% 26.6%2004/05 12.7% 4.7% 18.5% 11.5% 1.3% 21.1% 17.6% 5.0% 28.3%
FWEST 2001/02 15.8% 7.3% 23.0% 15.2% 2.2% 12.4% 22.0% 7.6% 25.7%2002/03 15.4% 7.2% 22.2% 14.3% 2.2% 13.2% 21.2% 7.5% 26.4%2003/04 14.0% 7.4% 21.6% 15.2% 2.2% 12.7% 21.2% 7.8% 25.1%2004/05 15.8% 7.6% 20.3% 14.6% 2.9% 15.7% 21.9% 8.2% 25.2%
NCENT 2001/02 13.6% 4.5% 21.1% 16.2% 1.4% 14.5% 21.3% 4.8% 26.0%2002/03 14.8% 4.8% 20.0% 13.8% 1.6% 14.9% 20.4% 5.1% 24.8%2003/04 12.4% 4.7% 20.2% 12.7% 1.4% 16.5% 18.8% 4.9% 26.1%2004/05 13.3% 4.8% 19.4% 13.0% 1.8% 18.8% 18.8% 5.4% 27.0%
NORTH 2001/02 15.3% 5.0% 21.4% 17.4% 1.7% 12.8% 23.1% 5.3% 24.9%2002/03 16.6% 5.3% 20.6% 14.5% 2.2% 13.3% 22.2% 5.8% 24.3%2003/04 14.2% 5.1% 21.3% 13.8% 1.8% 14.4% 20.7% 5.4% 25.7%2004/05 14.9% 5.4% 20.4% 13.9% 2.2% 16.8% 20.5% 6.1% 26.2%
SCENT 2001/02 9.3% 4.6% 15.6% 9.9% 1.3% 12.5% 13.8% 4.8% 21.1%2002/03 9.7% 4.5% 13.8% 8.4% 1.5% 13.3% 13.1% 4.7% 19.8%2003/04 8.6% 4.5% 14.5% 8.3% 1.3% 13.3% 12.4% 4.7% 20.4%2004/05 8.8% 4.4% 12.5% 8.2% 1.3% 15.3% 12.4% 4.6% 19.7%
SOUTH 2001/02 7.6% 4.2% 14.1% 11.2% 1.0% 21.1% 13.9% 4.3% 26.2%2002/03 8.6% 4.2% 13.7% 10.6% 1.0% 22.9% 13.8% 4.4% 26.9%2003/04 7.4% 4.2% 13.9% 9.2% 1.0% 21.6% 12.2% 4.3% 25.4%2004/05 7.7% 4.3% 12.3% 8.9% 1.2% 24.2% 12.3% 4.5% 27.1%
WEST 2001/02 14.1% 6.8% 21.0% 16.2% 2.5% 14.7% 21.8% 7.3% 26.4%2002/03 14.8% 6.9% 20.0% 14.9% 2.3% 14.8% 21.3% 7.3% 25.8%2003/04 13.5% 6.9% 19.9% 14.5% 2.4% 16.7% 21.2% 7.4% 26.5%2004/05 14.5% 7.3% 19.1% 15.2% 3.4% 19.1% 21.6% 8.2% 27.1%
42
BUSINESS LOAD FACTOR DYNAMIC ASSIGNMENT ISSUES
Presented by ERCOT Staff to
Profiling Working Group
09/29/2005
43
BUSINESS LOAD FACTOR DYNAMIC ASSIGNMENT ISSUES
• Load Factor is calculated for assignment year (e.g. May 2004 – April 2005)
• Transactions to change Profile Type are submitted in October and applied for next 12 months
• Year-to-year, season-to-season and month-to-month Load Factors can be out of sync with actual use
• For example, a high Load Factor monthly read can be settled with a low Load Factor Profile
44
PROFILE ID ASSIGNMENT LAGESIID PROFILE TYPES OUT OF PHASE
PROFILE ASSIGNMENT
2002 2003 2004 ESIIDsWRONG
2003WRONG
2004RIGHT BOTH
YEARSWRONG ONE
YEARWRONG TWO
YEARS
BUSHILF BUSHILF BUSHILF 14,825 0 0 14,825 0 0BUSMEDLF BUSHILF BUSHILF 2,855 2,855 0 0 2,855 0BUSMEDLF BUSMEDLF BUSHILF 2,695 0 2,695 0 2,695 0BUSHILF BUSMEDLF BUSHILF 1,255 1,255 1,255 0 0 1,255BUSLOLF BUSHILF BUSHILF 286 286 0 0 286 0BUSLOLF BUSLOLF BUSHILF 270 0 270 0 270 0BUSLOLF BUSHILF BUSHILF 215 215 0 0 215 0BUSMEDLF BUSLOLF BUSHILF 104 104 104 0 0 104BUSHILF BUSLOLF BUSHILF 50 50 50 0 0 50
BUSHILF TOTAL 22,555 4,765 4,374 14,825 6,321 1,40921.1% 19.4% 65.7% 28.0% 6.2%
BUSMEDLF BUSMEDLF BUSMEDLF 43,665 0 0 43,665 0 0BUSLODLF BUSMEDLF BUSMEDLF 6,121 6,121 0 0 6,121 0BUSLODLF BUSLODLF BUSMEDLF 5,709 0 5,709 0 5,709 0BUSMEDLF BUSLODLF BUSMEDLF 2,683 2,683 2,683 0 0 2,683BUSHILF BUSMEDLF BUSMEDLF 2,394 2,394 0 0 2,394 0BUSHILF BUSHILF BUSMEDLF 2,185 0 2,185 0 2,185 0BUSMEDLF BUSHILF BUSMEDLF 1,873 1,873 1,873 0 0 1,873BUSLOLF BUSHILF BUSMEDLF 144 144 144 0 0 144BUSHILF BUSLOLF BUSMEDLF 128 128 128 0 0 128
BUSMEDLF TOTAL 64,902 13,343 12,722 43,665 16,409 4,82820.6% 19.6% 67.3% 25.3% 7.4%
BUSLOLF BUSLOLF BUSLOLF 164,232 0 0 164,232 0 0BUSMEDLF BUSLOLF BUSLOLF 6,090 6,090 0 0 6,090 0BUSMEDLF BUSMEDLF BUSLOLF 5,157 0 5,157 0 5,157 0BUSLOLF BUSMEDLF BUSLOLF 3,829 3,829 3,829 0 0 3,829BUSHILF BUSLOLF BUSLOLF 412 412 0 0 412 0BUSHILF BUSMEDLF BUSLOLF 377 377 377 0 0 377BUSHILF BUSHILF BUSLOLF 236 0 236 0 236 0BUSLOLF BUSHILF BUSLOLF 200 200 200 0 0 200BUSMEDLF BUSHILF BUSLOLF 146 146 146 0 0 146
BUSLOLF TOTAL 180,679 11,054 9,945 164,232 11,895 4,5526.1% 5.5% 90.9% 6.6% 2.5%
TOTAL 268,136 29,162 27,041 222,722 34,625 10,78910.9% 10.1% 83.1% 12.9% 4.0%
Note: table is based on ESIIDs with complete data for all three years
Because of the assignment lag, we discover during Annual Validation that, for some ESIIDs, the previous assignment is inconsistent with actual use during the year for which the previous assignment was used in settlement
45
MONTHLY READS AND ANNUAL USE BYASSIGNED PROFILE TYPE VS MONTHLY LOAD FACTOR
PERCENT OF MONTHLY READS PRECENT OF ANNUAL KWH
LOAD FACTOR CATEGORY LOAD FACTOR CATEGORYTDSP ASSIGNED PROFILE TYPE LOW MEDIUM HIGH LOW MEDIUM HIGH
AEPC BUSLOLF 88.5% 9.9% 1.6% 78.9% 18.9% 2.2%BUSMEDLF 42.4% 44.7% 12.9% 14.3% 62.3% 23.4%BUSHILF 4.2% 17.2% 78.6% 0.6% 13.3% 86.1%
PERCENT CORRECT 74.3% 74.3%
AEPN BUSLOLF 88.4% 9.0% 2.6% 80.5% 17.0% 2.5%BUSMEDLF 40.4% 44.3% 15.3% 14.5% 66.1% 19.4%BUSHILF 5.1% 15.0% 79.9% 0.7% 13.8% 85.5%
PERCENT CORRECT 72.7% 76.1%
CNP BUSLOLF 87.4% 11.0% 1.6% 78.4% 19.0% 2.6%BUSMEDLF 36.3% 49.6% 14.1% 15.5% 63.8% 20.7%BUSHILF 6.0% 22.1% 71.9% 1.2% 17.7% 81.1%
PERCENT CORRECT 71.7% 73.1%
NUE BUSLOLF 98.8% 1.2% 0.0% 97.1% 2.9% 0.0%BUSMEDLF 22.6% 71.8% 5.6% 20.2% 77.5% 2.3%BUSHILF 0.0% 10.7% 89.3% 0.0% 8.9% 91.1%
PERCENT CORRECT 87.0% 88.7%
SHRY BUSLOLF 57.8% 25.8% 16.4% 59.6% 30.2% 10.1%BUSMEDLF 35.0% 32.4% 32.6% 16.0% 38.0% 46.1%BUSHILF 8.8% 9.8% 81.4% 2.0% 4.0% 94.0%
PERCENT CORRECT 44.9% 49.9%
TED BUSLOLF 90.2% 9.0% 0.8% 81.3% 17.3% 1.4%BUSMEDLF 36.5% 52.3% 11.2% 13.3% 67.3% 19.4%BUSHILF 3.7% 20.4% 75.9% 0.6% 13.4% 86.1%
PERCENT CORRECT 76.2% 76.9%
TNMP BUSLOLF 89.6% 8.9% 1.5% 80.0% 18.2% 1.8%BUSMEDLF 39.5% 45.2% 15.3% 15.0% 60.4% 24.5%BUSHILF 5.5% 19.8% 74.7% 0.8% 12.5% 86.6%
PERCENT CORRECT 74.4% 74.3%
TOTAL BUSLOLF 89.1% 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 0.0% 0.0%BUSMEDLF 37.7% 49.6% 12.7% 14.3% 65.1% 20.7%BUSHILF 4.6% 20.1% 75.2% 0.8% 14.6% 84.5%
PERCENT CORRECT 74.4% 75.2%
ERCOT receives monthly kWh and kW reads from TDSPs indicate a monthly load factor … these can be inconsistent with the Profile Assignment
46
PERCENT OF ESIIDs WITH"MISS-PROFILED" READS
NUMBER OF "MISS-PROFILED" READS
TDSP ASSIGNED PROFILE TYPE 0 1 2 - 3 4 - 5 6 - 10 >10
AEPC BUSLOLF 58.5% 11.0% 11.5% 7.7% 9.5% 1.8%BUSMEDLF 5.3% 6.0% 13.8% 15.2% 32.9% 26.7%BUSHILF 28.2% 16.1% 19.7% 13.8% 17.8% 4.3%TOTAL 40.0% 9.8% 12.7% 10.4% 17.3% 9.7%
AEPN BUSLOLF 60.7% 10.4% 10.7% 7.2% 8.1% 3.0%BUSMEDLF 6.4% 8.1% 15.8% 13.8% 30.2% 25.7%BUSHILF 31.0% 15.2% 19.3% 14.2% 16.7% 3.7%TOTAL 39.5% 10.1% 13.2% 10.1% 16.4% 10.8%
CNP BUSLOLF 54.2% 12.5% 11.7% 8.3% 11.4% 1.9%BUSMEDLF 5.5% 7.2% 14.5% 15.3% 34.1% 23.4%BUSHILF 25.4% 11.2% 15.7% 14.2% 24.3% 9.1%TOTAL 33.2% 10.4% 13.1% 11.5% 21.1% 10.7%
NUE BUSLOLF 83.3% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%BUSMEDLF 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 20.0% 0.1%BUSHILF 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%TOTAL 46.2% 15.4% 7.7% 23.1% 7.7% 0.1%
SHRY BUSLOLF 10.3% 20.7% 13.8% 5.2% 24.1% 25.9%BUSMEDLF 5.4% 7.5% 14.0% 18.3% 30.1% 24.7%BUSHILF 21.4% 42.9% 7.1% 14.3% 7.1% 7.1%TOTAL 8.4% 14.9% 13.3% 13.7% 26.2% 23.6%
TED BUSLOLF 62.2% 10.2% 10.9% 8.2% 7.4% 1.2%BUSMEDLF 8.4% 8.4% 15.1% 15.8% 31.1% 21.2%BUSHILF 27.8% 13.8% 17.8% 13.3% 21.5% 5.8%TOTAL 41.3% 9.9% 12.8% 11.2% 16.5% 8.3%
TNMP BUSLOLF 61.9% 10.9% 9.9% 7.2% 8.3% 1.8%BUSMEDLF 4.8% 5.9% 13.4% 14.4% 33.5% 27.9%BUSHILF 24.4% 13.1% 20.9% 14.7% 20.6% 6.3%TOTAL 41.0% 9.5% 11.8% 10.0% 17.2% 10.4%
TOTAL BUSLOLF 59.4% 11.0% 11.1% 8.0% 8.9% 1.6%BUSMEDLF 6.8% 7.5% 14.7% 15.4% 32.4% 23.2%BUSHILF 27.1% 13.4% 17.7% 13.8% 21.5% 6.5%TOTAL 38.8% 10.0% 12.8% 11.0% 17.9% 9.4%
The majority of ESIIDs have one or more monthly reads which are inconsistent with the Profile Assignment
top related