quita vs. ca
Post on 17-Aug-2015
241 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
1 | Article 15Republic of the PhilippinesSUPREME COURTManilaSECOND DIVISION G.R. No. 124862 December 22, 1998FE D. QUITA, petitioner, vs.COURT OF APPEAS !"# $ANDINA DANDAN, * responents. $EOSIO, J.:!E D. "#I$% an %rturo $. Palan, both !ilipinos, &ere 'arrie in the Philippines on () Ma* (+,(. $he* &ere notho&everblesse&ithchilren. So'e&herealon-the&a*theirrelationshipsoure. Eventuall*!esue %rturoforivorce in San !rancisco, California, #.S.%. She sub'itte in the ivorce proceein-s a private &ritin- ate (+ .ul*(+/0 eviencin- their a-ree'ent to live separatel* fro' each other an a settle'ent of their con1u-al properties. On 23.ul* (+/, she obtaine a final 1u-'ent of ivorce. $hree 435 &ee6s thereafter she 'arrie a certain !eli7 $upa8 in thesa'e localit* but their relationship also ene in a ivorce. Still in the #.S.%., she 'arrie for the thir ti'e, to a certain9erni'ont.On (: %pril (+;2 %rturo ie.
top related