prof. willard mccarty - mimesis to poesis in the digital humanities

Post on 16-Jan-2015

1.860 Views

Category:

Education

2 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Presentation of Prof. Willard McCarty (King's College, London) for THATCamp Switzerland, Lausanne, 11-12 November 2011

TRANSCRIPT

Mimesis to poiesis in the digital humanities !

Willard McCarty!Department of Digital Humanities !

King’s College London!www.mccarty.org.uk/!

ca 1950-1995!

!"

& commercial development

in academic !departments!

by computing centres, libraries & other non-academic units!

from work!done in!

#"

The result:!many good things, but on the whole little advance on mimetic mechanisation of the codex – hence by analogy with the mechanisation of music, !the knowledge jukebox.!

!"#$%&'()*"*%+&",-.*/.01%234,54#"%6789$%:%;.**.-<%34,54#"%$*%5<"%6"87*5.=%>"?@1AB.C.57,%&487*.5."-%DEEF1%G4,41%;.*,7*HA $"

Andrew Webster, “Computers: The New Age of Miracles”, Toronto Globe and Mail, 16 November 1965!

Tim Berners-Lee, James Hendler and Ora Lassila, “The Semantic Web”, Scientific American, May 2001 !

%"

Little conceptual advance in ca 40 years!

ca 1995-2005!

&"

Formation of a discipline centred on methods: the digital humanities as keepers of a “methodological commons”. But how is this of the humanities?!

Difficult questions & tentative answers!•  What are we trying to do?"

!–  Simply to be useful to the older disciplines? Become the perfect servant, and so be without a life of our own?"

!–  Found a new discipline on the basis of a methodology which provides cogent explanations of phenomena

that cannot be obtained by any other means? Thus Latour’s moral quandry (in “The Politics of Explanation”):"!•  “If the work of explaining something is that of empire-building, should we explain something?.... Do we

want to add yet another discipline and profession to the many that we study?.... Do we lust for power and recognition?....”!

•  This lust is wrong because it distracts. Explanation and its concrete instantiation in methods are not a desirable goals because they divert us from that which we study. They become things in themselves, distancing us from that which give them meaning. Computational methodology is a house built on sand. "!

•  Again Latour: replace methodology by style (by playing a role rather than following a rule).!

'"

=7%DEEI:A

JA

("

Apart from theories and imperatives, what actually do we find going on in this space of the digital humanities?!

Computing in the humanities!

Simulating! Modelling!

Publishing!

)"

Computing in the humanities!

Simulating! Modelling!

Publishing!

*+"

Actions, not things!

Simulating! Modelling!

of!

for!

Publishing!

Computing in the humanities!

**"

Basics: modelling!

Cantwell Smith 1985.!

*!"

modelling of!

modelling for!

residue!

Mimetic!

Creative!

Simulating! Modelling!is!

might be!

of!

for!

Computing in the humanities!

*#"

Basics: simulatingA

*$"

?!real city!

simulated city!

New, unpredictable behaviours!

•  Jerry Fodor: “no computation without representation” (Language of Thought, 1975)."!•  I suggest: “No computing (in the

humanities) without experimenting and comparing”.!

*%"

!"#$%&'(K%;#78.*C%5<"%-5',"-A*&"

Computing in the humanities!

Simulating! Modelling!

Publishing!

*'"

Like a thief in the night!•  Joseph Weizenbaum: “…the direct societal effects of any

pervasive new technology are as nothing compared to its much more subtle and ultimately more important side effects” (“On the Impact of the Computer on Society”, 1972)."!

•  What, for us now, are these? "!–  Wide & interdisciplinary rather than deep & specialist;!–  Argumentative rather than evidential;!–  Probabilistic rather than determined;!–  Conjecturally scientific – when it suits the research;!–  and…!

*("

*)"

Trade Union !Congress, !1936!

Charlie Chaplin, Modern Times, 1936!

L>"%87'%=$897#"%7%87*%.*%5<"%9#$="--%$M%=$8945.*C%7%#"7,%*48?"#%5$%7%87=<.*"%N<.=<%.-%$*,'%=797?,"%$M%7%O*.5"%*48?"#%$M%=$*H.5.$*-KKKKP%QK%RK%S4#.*C1%TUVW%+7M5"#%X"$#C"%6K%Y$$,$-%7*H%Z.=<7#H%3K%["\#"'1%)*+,$-./"0"-1'.23'4*#"56%DEE]^%DT1%;.CK%VKT0A"

!+"

6<",,%G.,%7H("#51%7.-$%3.1'89&2"2#':*;-1%TW%B"="8?"#%TUIE1%-<$N.*C%_YR%>$#,H%&"7H`47#5"#-1%I]5<%65#""5%7*H%R7H.-$*%Q("*4"1%N<.=<%5<"*%H.-9,7'"H%5<"%6","=5.("%6"`4"*="%!,"=5#$*.=%37,=4,75$#%+66!31%*.=/*78"H%La$997P%?'%97--"#-b?'0%.*%5<"%M#$*5%N.*H$NKA

"

;#$*5%=$("#1%<"+&'=.#.>"2&1%D%Q9#.,%TUWIK"

McCulloch-Pitts model of the brain, based on the Turing Machine, 1943-48!

Judy Trogadis & John K. Stevens, promotionl microphotograph of a human brain cell growing on a Motorola 68000 chip, 1984.!

Commercial communications interface between neuronal cells and silicon-based electronic devices, the Golden Brain project, November 2004. !

top related