prevalence and molecular detection of gastrointestinal
Post on 13-Feb-2022
5 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Prevalence and Molecular Detection of
Gastrointestinal Pathogens in Sheep, Goats and
Fish from Papua New Guinea
Submitted by Melanie Koinari (BiomedSc Honours)
This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Murdoch
University
School of Veterinary and Life Sciences
Abstract Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
Abstract
Gastrointestinal parasites of livestock cause diseases of important socio-
economic concern worldwide. The two main types of intestinal parasites are helminths
and protozoa. They can cause high mortality, reduce production and lead to significant
overall economic losses. In tropical and subtropical areas, parasitic nematodes are
recognised as a limiting factor to the expansion and improvement of smallholder
production of small ruminants. In addition to their veterinary importance, some
parasites of domesticated livestock can also be transmitted to companion animals and
wildlife, and are a threat to public health.
Little is known of the prevalence of internal pathogens in domesticated animals
or wildlife in Papua New Guinea (PNG). There have been various reports on
gastrointestinal helminth and Eimeria infections in sheep and goats in PNG. However,
those surveys have been restricted in their geographical range and have only been
performed on animals raised in government or institutional (either university or
agriculture research institution) farms. There is insufficient information on the
epidemiology of gastrointestinal parasites infecting sheep and goats in smallholder
farms. Fish, both cultured and wild caught, are an important food source in PNG, but
there have been few previous surveys of parasite infection in fish. Therefore, the aim of
this study was to investigate the prevalence of various pathogens including
gastrointestinal nematodes, Eimeria, Cryptosporidium, Giardia and Chlamydia in sheep
and goats; and Cryptosporidium, Giardia and anisakids in fish in PNG. A total of 504
faecal samples were collected from sheep (n = 276) and goats (n = 228) in smallholder,
government and institutional farms, and a total of 614 fish (25 species) (cultured
freshwater n = 132, wild freshwater n = 206 and wild marine n = 276) were sampled
from February to August 2011. The study sites for sheep and goats covered a wide
geographical area, representing the major sheep and goat farming regions of PNG.
Samples were screened using microscopy and molecular techniques.
The overall prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in sheep and goats in 165
small ruminants (110 sheep and 55 goats) using a modified McMaster technique was
77.6 % (128/165), with 72 % (79/110) of sheep and 89 % (49/55) of goats having one or
Abstract Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
4
more species of gastrointestinal parasite. The gastrointestinal parasites found and
their prevalences in sheep (S) and in goats (G) were: trichostrongylids 67.3 % (S),
85.5 % (G); Eimeria 17.3 % (S), 16.4 % (G); Strongyloides 8.2 % (S), 23.6 % (G); Fasciola
5.5 % (S), 18.2 % (G); Trichuris 1.8 % (S), 3.6 % (G); and Nematodirus 1.8 % (S), 3.6 %
(G). Two additional genera were found in goats: Moniezia (9.1 %) and Dictyocaulus
(3.6 %). To identify the pathogenic trichostrongylids, further analysis using a species-
specific qPCR was performed on genomic DNA from faeces of 263 sheep and 228
goats. The prevalence of each nematode in sheep (S) and goats (G) were: Haemonchus
contortus 41.1 % (S) and 41.7 % (G), Teladorsagia circumcincta 21.3 % (S) and 24.1 %
(G) and Trichostrongylus spp. 14.8 % (S) and 14 % (G). In addition, a total of 94 samples
(mostly Eimeria-positives by microscopy), which included 57 faecal samples from
sheep and 37 faecal samples from goats, were screened by qPCR. The prevalence of
Eimeria was 64.9 % (37/57) for sheep and 91.9 % (34/37) for goats. This is the first
study to quantitatively examine the prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in goats in
PNG. The high rates of parasitism observed in the present study are likely to be
associated with poor farming management practises including lack of pasture recovery
time, lack of parasite control measures and poor quality feed.
Using molecular tools (nested PCRs), genomic DNA samples from sheep
(n = 276), goats (n = 228) and fish (n = 614) were screened for Cryptosporidium spp.
and positives were genotyped at the 18S rRNA, 60 kDa glycoprotein (gp60) and actin
loci. The overall prevalence for Cryptosporidium at the 18S rRNA locus was 2.2 %
(6/276) in sheep, 4.4 % (10/228) in goats and 1.14 % (7/614) in fish. In sheep,
C. parvum (subtypes IIaA15G2R1 and IIaA19G4R1), C. andersoni and C. scrofarum were
identified. In goats, C. hominis (subtype IdA15G1), C. parvum, C. xiaoi and rat genotype
II were identified. In fish, C. hominis (subtype IdA15G1), C. parvum (IIaA14G2R1,
IIaA15G2R1 and IIaA19G4R1) and a novel genotype were identified in cultured
freshwater (n = 2), wild freshwater (n = 1), and wild marine (n = 4) fish hosts.
Cryptosporidium was found in four different fish species; Nile tilapia (Oreochromis
niloticus), silver barb (Puntius gonionotus), mackerel scad (Decapterus macarellus) and
oblong silver biddy (Gerres oblongus). A novel piscine genotype in fish (piscine
genotype 8) was identified in two marine oblong silver biddies and it exhibited a 4.3 %
Abstract Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
5
genetic distance from piscine genotype 3 (its closest relative) at the 18S locus. The
three subtypes of C. parvum identified in sheep and fish (IIaA14G2R1, IIaA15G2R1 and
IIaA19G4R1) were all zoonotic. This is the first report of Cryptosporidium spp. in sheep,
goats and fish in PNG. Identification of Cryptosporidium in livestock warrants better
care of farm animals to avoid contamination and illness in vulnerable populations. The
detection of zoonotic Cryptosporidium in livestock suggests these animals may serve as
reservoirs for human infection. Zoonotic Cryptosporidium were identified in fish
samples from all three groups (cultured and wild freshwater fish and wild marine fish).
The identification of zoonotic Cryptosporidium genotypes in fish is important to public
health in PNG and should be further investigated. In particular, detection of
Cryptosporidium among fingerlings from aquaculture farms warrants further research
to gain a better understanding of the epidemiology of Cryptosporidium infection in
cultured fish.
Giardia duodenalis was screened in sheep (n = 276), goats (n = 228) and fish
(n = 272) using qPCR targeting the glutamate dehydrogenase (gdh) gene. The overall
prevalence of G. duodenalis was 9.1 % (25/256) in sheep, 12.3 % (28/228) in goats and
7 % (19/272) in fish. Although the present study found a low prevalence for
G. duodenalis in adult small ruminants and fish, these animals can be considered as
sources of contamination for susceptible hosts in PNG, because low numbers of
Giardia cysts can cause infection. This is the first study to identify Giardia spp. in
sheep, goats and fish in PNG. It demonstrates that G. duodenalis is prevalent in small
ruminants and fish in PNG. Giardia duodenalis assemblage E (livestock genotype) was
more prevalent in sheep and goats than zoonotic assemblages A and B. Further
research into the characterisation of G. duodenalis assemblages in livestock, fish and
humans in PNG is required to better understand its zoonotic potential.
The prevalence of anisakid nematode larvae in marine fish collected on the
coastal shelves off the townships of Madang and Rabaul in PNG was investigated using
microscopy and molecular techniques. The third-stage larvae of several genera of
anisakid nematodes are important etiological agents for zoonotic human anisakidosis.
Nematodes were found in seven fish species including Decapterus macarellus, Gerres
Abstract Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
6
oblongus, Pinjalo lewisi, Pinjalo pinjalo, Selar crumenophthalmus, Scomberomorus
maculatus and Thunnus albacares. They were identified by both light and scanning
electron microscopy as Anisakis Type I larvae. Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of
the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) and the mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase
subunit II (cox2) gene identified all nematodes as Anisakis typica. This study represents
the first in-depth characterization of Anisakis larvae from seven new fish hosts in PNG.
The overall prevalence of larvae was low (7.6 %) and no recognised zoonotic Anisakis
species were identified, suggesting a low threat of anisakidosis in PNG.
Finally, the prevalence of Chlamydia abortus and C. pecorum in sheep (n = 221)
and goats (n = 128) were investigated using two species-specific qPCR assays, targeting
the outer membrane protein cell surface antigen gene (ompA). The overall prevalence
of C. abortus was 12.2 % (27/221) in sheep and 8.6 % (11/128) in goats, while for
C. pecorum, it was 7.7 % (17/221) in sheep and 8.6 % (11/128) in goats. This is the first
study to identify C. abortus and C. pecorum in sheep and goats in PNG. It also
demonstrates that C. abortus and C. pecorum are prevalent in sheep and goats in PNG,
highlighting a need for further research to quantify the production impacts of these
bacteria. Furthermore, the results of the present study indicate that C. abortus could
pose a risk of transmission to humans, especially, in PNG, where small ruminants in
villages are cared for by women on a daily basis.
In summary, the present study represents the most detailed investigation of
gastrointestinal parasites using molecular tools in sheep, goats and fish in PNG to date.
A variety of gastrointestinal pathogens were identified. This provides an important
update on internal pathogens of sheep and goats from previous studies (Quartermain,
2004b). Future investigations should include longitudinal studies and larger cohorts to
further assess parasite epidemiology in the diverse agro-climatic zones in the country.
Declaration Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
Declaration
I declare this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main
content, work which has not been previously submitted for any degree and is not
currently being submitted for any other degree or qualification. I declare that I have
conducted the research described except where otherwise acknowledged.
………………………………………………………………………….
Melanie Koinari
May 2014
Acknowledgements Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
Acknowledgements
I would like to acknowledge my supervisors Professor Una Ryan and Associate
Professor Alan Lymbery for their guidance, sharing their experience and the time they
dedicated to my work.
I would also like to thank my other friends and colleagues at Murdoch
University for their assistance over the years, especially Dr. Rongchang Yang, Josephine
Ng-Hublin, Eileen Elliot, Dr. Andrea Paparini and Louise Pallant.
Many thanks to my friends and colleagues from the National Agriculture
Research Institute of Papua New Guinea, without who, sample collection in PNG
described in Chapter 2, could not have been conducted. I sincerely thank Dr. Workneh
Ayalew for providing the opportunity for me to collaborate with NARI and also for
assistance with the execution of this study. I am very grateful to the staffs at Labu and
Tambul, who were friendly, fun and willing to assist me wherever they could during my
time at NARI. My special thanks goes to Atmaleo Aguyanto for her friendship, helpful
discussions on sheep and goats in the country, organising sample collection at Labu
and for showing me her technique for faecal worm egg counts. I also would like to
thank Densley Tapat who organised fish sampling at aquaculture sites in Mumeng and
Martin Lobao and Johaness Pakatel for organising sampling from sheep and goats at
Baisu and Tambul. Furthermore, many thanks to the driver, Awatang Naru.
I acknowledge the staff of Department of Agriculture and Livestock in Goroka,
Papua New Guinea, especially, many thanks to Igu Yawani and Mr Farope for their
assistance during sampling in smallholder farms.
I am very grateful for subsistence sheep and goat farmers in Menifo, Benabena,
Goroka, Korefeigu, Daulo, in Eastern Highlands Province and Chuave in Simbu Province
for allowing me and my team to take samples from their animals. In addition, I thank
the fish farmers in Kundiawa, Asaro, Mumeng and Bathem for allowing me to take fish
samples from their farms.
I would like to thank Dr. Pascal Michon at Divine Word University in Madang for
organising a light microscope, which I used to perform work described in Chapter 3.
Acknowledgements Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
9
I would like to acknowledge my husband, Stephan, at the University of Western
Australia, for his assistance with scanning electron microscopy on anisakid nematodes
described in Chapter 2.
I would like to acknowledge financial support through international postgraduate
scholarship provided by Murdoch University.
Most importantly, I am very grateful to my family in PNG and also in Germany, for
their endless support. This work would not exist without my husband, Stephan and my
son Michael, who have been my steadfast companions throughout these very exciting
years of my life.
Table of Contents Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
Table of Contents
Abstract .................................................................................................................... 3
Declaration ............................................................................................................... 7
Acknowledgements .................................................................................................. 8
Table of Contents ................................................................................................... 10
List of Figures ......................................................................................................... 16
List of Tables ........................................................................................................... 18
List of Abbreviations .............................................................................................. 20
Statement of candidate contribution .................................................................... 22
1. General Introduction .......................................................................................... 23
1.1 Background ...................................................................................................... 24
1.1.1 Papua New Guinea: sheep, goats and fish. .............................................. 24
1.1.2 The impact of gastrointestinal parasites on sheep and goats ................. 26
1.1.3 Gastrointestinal pathogens of sheep and goats ...................................... 27
1.1.4 Gastrointestinal parasites of fish ............................................................. 30
1.2 Gastrointestinal parasitic nematodes of sheep and goats .............................. 31
1.2.1 Distribution and taxonomy ...................................................................... 31
1.2.2 Life cycle and morphology ....................................................................... 33
1.2.3 Pathogenicity and clinical signs ................................................................ 35
1.2.4 Diagnosis .................................................................................................. 36
1.2.5 Treatment and control ............................................................................. 38
1.3 Eimeria ............................................................................................................. 39
1.3.1 Distribution and taxonomy ...................................................................... 39
1.3.2 Life cycle and morphology ....................................................................... 40
1.3.3 Pathogenicity and clinical signs ................................................................ 42
1.3.4 Diagnosis .................................................................................................. 42
1.3.5 Treatment and control ............................................................................. 43
Table of Contents Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
11
1.4 Cryptosporidium ............................................................................................... 43
1.4.1 Distribution and taxonomy ...................................................................... 43
1.4.2 Life cycle and morphology........................................................................ 47
1.4.3 Pathogenicity and clinical signs ................................................................ 50
1.4.4 Diagnosis ................................................................................................... 50
1.4.5 Treatment and control ............................................................................. 52
1.5 Giardia .............................................................................................................. 53
1.5.1 Distribution and taxonomy ...................................................................... 53
1.5.2 Life cycle and morphology........................................................................ 54
1.5.3 Pathogenicity and clinical signs ................................................................ 56
1.5.4 Diagnosis ................................................................................................... 57
1.5.5 Treatment and control ............................................................................. 58
1.6 Anisakids........................................................................................................... 59
1.6.1 Distribution and taxonomy ...................................................................... 59
1.6.2 Life cycle and morphology........................................................................ 61
1.6.3 Pathogenicity and clinical signs ................................................................ 63
1.6.4 Diagnosis ................................................................................................... 64
1.6.5 Treatment and control ............................................................................. 65
1.7 Chlamydia ......................................................................................................... 66
1.7.1 Distribution and taxonomy ...................................................................... 66
1.7.2 Life cycle and morphology........................................................................ 68
1.7.3 Pathogenicity and clinical signs ................................................................ 70
1.7.4 Diagnosis ................................................................................................... 71
1.7.5 Treatment and control ............................................................................. 73
1.8 Aims of the present study ................................................................................ 74
2. Materials and Methods ...................................................................................... 75
2.1 General background of the study .................................................................... 76
2.2 Human and animal ethics approval ................................................................. 76
Table of Contents Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
12
2.3 Sampling ........................................................................................................... 76
2.3.1 Study locations for sheep and goats ........................................................ 76
2.3.2 Study locations for fish ............................................................................. 78
2.4 Survey questionnaire ....................................................................................... 79
2.5 Animals ............................................................................................................. 82
2.5.1 Sheep and goats ....................................................................................... 82
2.5.2 Fish ........................................................................................................... 83
2.6 Shipment of biological samples ....................................................................... 86
2.7 Parasitology ...................................................................................................... 86
2.7.1 Faecal worm egg count ............................................................................ 86
2.7.2 Morphological analysis of anisakid nematodes ....................................... 87
2.8 DNA isolation.................................................................................................... 88
2.8.1 Isolation of genomic DNA from faeces ..................................................... 88
2.8.2 Isolation of genomic DNA from anisakid larvae ....................................... 89
2.8.3 Isolation of genomic DNA from fish gut scrapings ................................... 90
2.9 DNA amplification ............................................................................................ 90
2.9.1 Molecular detection of trichostrongylid nematodes by qPCR ................. 91
2.9.2 Molecular detection of Eimeria spp. by qPCR and nested PCR. .............. 92
2.9.3 Molecular detection of Cryptosporidium spp. using nested PCR ............. 93
2.9.4 Molecular detection of Giardia spp. using qPCR and nested PCR ........... 96
2.9.5 Molecular detection of anisakid nematodes using PCR ......................... 100
2.9.6 Molecular detection of Chlamydia spp. by qPCR ................................... 101
2.10 Agarose gel electrophoresis ......................................................................... 102
2.11 PCR product extraction from gel .................................................................. 103
2.12 DNA sequencing PCR with dye terminator kit ............................................. 103
2.13 Post reaction purification ............................................................................. 103
2. 14 DNA Sequencing .......................................................................................... 104
2.15 Phylogenetic analysis ................................................................................... 104
Table of Contents Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
13
2.16 Statistics .......................................................................................................105
3. Prevalence and infection levels of helminth and coccidian parasites in sheep and goat in PNG ..........................................................................................................107
3.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................109
3.2 Methods .........................................................................................................109
3.2.1 Sample collection ...................................................................................109
3.2.2 Parasitology ............................................................................................111
3.2.3 DNA isolation ..........................................................................................111
3.2.4 Screening of trichostrongyles and Eimeria species by qPCR ..................111
3.2.5 Data analysis ...........................................................................................112
3.3 Results ............................................................................................................113
3.3.1 Infection levels of gastrointestinal parasites by microscopy .................113
3.3.2 Prevalence of trichostrongylid nematodes by qPCR ..............................118
3.3.3 Prevalence of Eimeria in sheep and goats by qPCR ...............................120
3.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................121
3.5 Conclusions ....................................................................................................125
4. Molecular characterisation of Cryptosporidium in sheep, goats and fish from PNG ..............................................................................................................................127
4.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................128
4.2 Methods .........................................................................................................129
4.2.1 Sample collection ...................................................................................130
4.2.2 DNA isolation ..........................................................................................130
4.2.3 Cryptosporidium genotyping and subtyping ..........................................130
4.2.4 GenBank nucleotide accession numbers ...............................................131
4.2.5 Histological analysis ................................................................................131
4.2.6 Analysis of prevalence ............................................................................132
4.3 Results ............................................................................................................132
4.3.1 Prevalence of Cryptosporidium in sheep, goats and fish. ......................132
Table of Contents Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
14
4.3.2 Molecular characterisation of Cryptosporidium species identified in sheep, goats and fish at the 18S, gp60 and actin locus .............................................. 133
4.3.3 Microscopy ............................................................................................. 135
4.4 Discussion ....................................................................................................... 139
4.5 Conclusions .................................................................................................... 143
5. Prevalence of Giardia duodenalis in sheep, goats and fish from PNG by quantitative PCR ....................................................................................................................... 145
5.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 146
5.2 Methods ......................................................................................................... 147
5.2.1 Sample collection ................................................................................... 147
5.2.2 DNA isolation and qPCR amplification ................................................... 147
5.2.3 Data analysis ........................................................................................... 147
5.3 Results ............................................................................................................ 147
5.4 Discussion ....................................................................................................... 150
5.5 Conclusions .................................................................................................... 151
6. Morphological and molecular characterisation of Anisakis species in fish from PNG .............................................................................................................................. 153
6.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 154
6.2 Methods ......................................................................................................... 157
6.2.1 Parasite collection .................................................................................. 157
6.2.2 Morphological analysis ........................................................................... 157
6.2.3 Genetic characterisation and phylogenetic analysis .............................. 158
6.3 Results ............................................................................................................ 160
6.3.1 Prevalence of Anisakis spp. .................................................................... 160
6.3.2 Morphology of Anisakis Type I larvae .................................................... 160
6.3.3 Phylogenetic analysis of the ITS region .................................................. 161
6.4 Discussion ....................................................................................................... 165
6.5 Conclusions .................................................................................................... 167
7. Prevalence of Chlamydia in sheep and goats from PNG by quantitative PCR . 169
Table of Contents Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
15
7.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................170
7.2 Methods .........................................................................................................170
7.2.1 Sample collection ...................................................................................170
7.2.2 DNA isolation and qPCR amplification ...................................................170
7.2.3 Data analysis ...........................................................................................171
7.3 Results ............................................................................................................171
7.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................173
7.5 Conclusions ....................................................................................................175
8. General discussion and concluding remarks ....................................................177
8.1 General discussion .........................................................................................178
8.2 Future directions ............................................................................................181
8.3 Concluding remarks........................................................................................183
Bibliography .........................................................................................................184
Appendices ...........................................................................................................227
List of Figures Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
List of Figures
Figure 1-1: Generalised life cycle of parasitic nematodes (order Strongylida) of the alimentary tract of livestock. .......................................................................................... 34
Figure 1-2: Life cycle of Eimeria species. ........................................................................ 41
Figure 1-3: A scanning electron micrograph of Cryptosporidium ................................... 48
Figure 1-4: Life cycle of Cryptosporidium parvum and C. hominis.................................. 49
Figure 1-5: Life cycle of Giardia duodenalis .................................................................... 55
Figure 1-6: Electron photomicrograph of Giardia duodenalis ........................................ 55
Figure 1-7: Complex life cycle of anisakid nematodes. ................................................... 62
Figure 1-8: Chlamydial development cycle ..................................................................... 69
Figure 2-1: Study locations for sheep, goats and fish in the present study. .................. 77
Figure 2-2: Pictures of sheep and goat farming in PNG. ................................................. 81
Figure 2-3: Pictures of fishing activities in PNG. ............................................................. 84
Figure 2-4: Trichostrongylid egg (left) and Eimeria oocyst (right) at 40x magnification. ......................................................................................................................................... 87
Figure 3-1: Flow chart of methods used for screening gastrointestinal parasites from faecal samples of sheep and goats. .............................................................................. 110
Figure 3-2: qPCR amplification plot for H. contortus as an example at the ITS-1 locus. ....................................................................................................................................... 113
Figure 4-1: Flow chart of the methodology for molecular detection of Cryptosporidium spp. in the present study. ............................................................................................. 129
Figure 4-2: Evolutionary relationships of Cryptosporidium isolates from sheep and goats inferred by neighbour-joining analysis of p distances calculated from pairwise comparison of 18S rRNA sequences. ............................................................................ 136
Figure 4-3: Evolutionary relationships of Cryptosporidium piscine-derived isolates inferred by neighbour-joining analysis of p distances calculated from pairwise comparison of 18S rRNA sequences. ............................................................................ 137
Figure 4-4: Phylogenetic relationships of Cryptosporidium isolates inferred by neighbor-joining analysis of the actin gene based on genetic distances calculated by the p distance model. ................................................................................................... 138
Figure 6-1: Type 1 and Type II Anisakis species belonging to the genus Anisakis. ....... 155
Figure 6-2: Schematic representation of diagnostic features for differentiating anisakids. ....................................................................................................................... 156
List of Figures Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
17
Figure 6-3: Overview of the methods for collection and screening of anisakid nematodes in the present study. .................................................................................. 158
Figure 6-4: Anisakis Type I larvae from Selar crumenophthalmus. .............................. 161
Figure 6-5: Phylogenetic relationships between Anisakis species from the present study (*) and other Anisakis species as inferred by neighbour-joining analysis of ITS rDNA. 163
Figure 6-6: Phylogenetic relationships between Anisakis species from the present study (*) and other Anisakis species inferred using the neighbour-joining analysis of cox2 genes. ............................................................................................................................ 164
List of Tables Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
List of Tables
Table 1-1: Common gastrointestinal helminths in sheep and goats ....................... 28
Table 1-2: Previously reported gastrointestinal parasites in sheep and goats from PNG .......................................................................................................................... 30
Table 1-3: Species/genotypes of Cryptosporidium reported in fish in previous studies. ..................................................................................................................... 46
Table 1-4: Molecular techniques for characterising Cryptosporidium. ................... 52
Table 1-5: Molecular techniques for characterising Giardia ................................... 58
Table 2-1: Sampling locations and farm information for the chosen sheep and goat flocks in the present study. .............................................................................. 78
Table 2-2: Number (N) of sheep and goat samples collected in the present study. .................................................................................................................................. 83
Table 2-3: Cultured freshwater, wild freshwater and marine fish species collected in the present study. ................................................................................................ 85
Table 3-1: Gastrointestinal parasite prevalence and mean ± SD EPG counts stratified by gastrointestinal parasite type for sheep and goats. .......................... 114
Table 3-2: Gastrointestinal parasite prevalence and mean EPG counts stratified for agro-ecology, farm management and sheep breed. ............................................. 116
Table 3-3: Gastrointestinal parasite prevalence and mean ± SD EPG counts for gastrointestinal parasite type and farm type. ....................................................... 117
Table 3-4: Prevalence of trichostrongylid nematodes for sheep and goats. ......... 119
Table 3-5: Comparisons of prevalences for H. contortus in sheep among the farm types. ...................................................................................................................... 119
Table 3-6: Comparisons of prevalences for Trichostrongylus spp. in sheep among the farm types. ....................................................................................................... 120
Table 3-7: Overall prevalence of Eimeria in sheep and goats by qPCR. ................ 120
Table 4-1: Prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in different farm types in sheep and goats in the present study. ............................................................................. 132
Table 4-2: Prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in fish in the present study. ........ 133
Table 4-3: Species and subtypes of Cryptosporidium identified in sheep and goats in the present study. .............................................................................................. 134
Table 4-4: Species, genotypes and subtypes of Cryptosporidium identified in fish in the present study. .................................................................................................. 135
List of Tables Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
19
Table 4-5: Percentage genetic differences between piscine genotype 8 and other Cryptosporidium species/genotypes at the 18S rRNA and actin loci. .................... 135
Table 5-1: Prevalence of G. duodenalis in sheep and goats in different farm types in the present study. .............................................................................................. 148
Table 5-2: Comparisons of prevalences for G. duodenalis in sheep and goats between farm types. .............................................................................................. 149
Table 5-3: Prevalence of G. duodenalis in fish from the three groups of aquatic environments in the present study. ....................................................................... 149
Table 5-4: Prevalence of G. duodenalis in different fish hosts in the present study. ................................................................................................................................ 149
Table 6-1: Common zoonotic anisakids-geographic distribution, hosts, common food dishes and diseases. ...................................................................................... 156
Table 6-2: Prevalence of anisakid larvae in different fish hosts in the present study as determined by PCR. ........................................................................................... 160
Table 6-3: Percentage similarity of the Anisakis species analysed in the present study and their closest relatives. ........................................................................... 162
Table 7-1: Prevalence of Chlamydia in sheep and goats in the present study. ..... 172
Table 7-2: Comparisons of prevalences for Chlamydia in sheep and goats between farm types. ............................................................................................................. 172
List of Abbreviations Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
List of Abbreviations
18S rRNA 18S ribosomal RNA
bg beta (β) giardin
BLAST basic local alignment search tool
CFT complement fixation test
CI confidence interval
Ct threshold cycle
cox2 cytochrome c oxidase subunit II
DAL Department of Agriculture and Livestock
DMSO dimethyl sulfoxide
dNTPs deoxynucleotide triphosphates
EB elementary body
EPG eggs per gram
EHP Eastern Highlands Province
EAE enzootic abortion of ewes
ELISA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
FECRT faecal egg count reduction test
FET Fisher’s exact test
gdh glutamate dehydrogenase
GI gastrointestinal parasites
gp60 60 kDA glycoprotein
IAC internal amplification control
IFA immunofluorescent assay
ITS internal transcribed spacer
ML maximum likelihood
MP maximum parsimony
mt-DNA mitochondrial DNA
NARI National Agriculture Research Institute
NJ neighbour joining
OEA ovine enzootic abortion
PCR polymerase chain reaction
PNG Papua New Guinea
qPCR quantitative polymerase chain reaction
RB reticulate body
rRNA ribosomal ribonucleic acid
List of Abbreviations Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
21
SSU rRNA small subunit of nuclear ribosomal RNA
Syn. synonym
tpi triose phosphate isomerase
WHP Western Highlands Province
Candidate Contribution Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
Statement of candidate contribution
Chapter Title Contribution
2 Materials and Methods M Koinari: 80 %
U Ryan: 10 %
W Ayalew: 5 %
R Yang: 5 %
3 Prevalence and infection levels of M Koinari: 80 %
gastrointestinal parasites in sheep and A Lymbery: 10 %
goats in PNG. U Ryan: 5 %
S Karl: 5 %
4 Molecular characterisation of M Koinari: 75 %
Cryptosporidium in sheep, goats and fish U Ryan: 10 %
from PNG A Lymbery: 5 %
S Karl: 5 %
J. Ng Hublin: 5 %
5 Prevalence of Giardia duodenalis from. M Koinari: 85 %
sheep, goats and fish from PNG U Ryan: 5 %
A Lymbery: 5 %
R Yang: 5 %
6 Morphological and molecular M Koinari: 80 %
characterisation of anisakid nematodes U Ryan: 5 %
in fish from PNG. A Lymbery: 5 %
S Karl: 5 %
R Elliot: 5 %
7 Prevalence of Chlamydia from sheep M Koinari: 85 %
and goats from PNG. U Ryan: 5 %
A Lymbery: 5 %
R Yang: 5 %
Chapter 1
1. General Introduction
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
1.1 Background
1.1.1 Papua New Guinea: sheep, goats and fish.
Papua New Guinea (PNG) lies north of Australia between latitudes 1° and 12°
south and longitudes 140° and 160° east. It consists of a mainland and a number of
islands of varying sizes. The centre of the mainland consists of a series of mountain
ranges with thickly frosted mountains in the centre, lowlands along the coast and
swampy alluvial plains in the southwest. The climate in the coastal areas is generally
hot and humid, with average temperatures ranging from 25 - 35 °C, while the valleys of
the central highlands are warm in the daytime but cooler in the night (18 - 20 °C) and
at the higher altitudes, frost occurs during certain times of the year. The rainfall varies
from 1000 mm to over 4000 mm (Bourke, 2010).
PNG’s population in 2012 was approximately 6.3 million with an annual growth
rate of 2.7 % (2011 census) and the majority (87 %) live in rural areas (CIA, 2012). As in
other developing countries, agriculture dominates the economy in rural villages. About
50 % of the agricultural output comes from production of food items, of which
livestock contributes about 13 % (Quartermain, 2004a). Livestock production has not
increased in the recent past, but meat consumption is increasing steadily and is
predicted to increase at 5 % per annum commensurate with the growth of the
population (Quartermain, 2004a). The shortfall in local supply is met with importation
of meat, especially, sheep (100 %) and beef (80 %), with the cost of imported livestock
products exceeding US$50 million (Quartermain, 2004a). In 1998, imports of sheep
meat and beef reached 41, 800 tons (shipped weight), involving an outlay of around
PGK130 million (Igua, 2001). Thus, sheep account for 38 % of meat consumption,
poultry meat 39 % and beef 17 % (Igua, 2001). In order to reduce its reliance on
imported sheep meat, the PNG government has attempted to increase production of
small ruminants and also to promote self-sufficiency (Vincent and Low, 2000; Igua,
2001).
The country is self-sufficient with poultry and pig products, which are produced
in either commercial or subsistence systems (Quartermain, 2004a). There are,
however, few commercial cattle farms and no commercial sheep and goats farms.
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
25
Sheep and goats are raised in government institutions (semi-commercial) or more
commonly in subsistence systems, where animals are kept primarily for household
consumption, but any animals not used for household consumption are sold for cash
or exchanged for other livestock or crops produced. In subsistence production
systems, the animals graze or scavenge unattended and are housed at night.
There are an estimated 20, 000 goats and 10, 000 sheep in PNG (Quartermain,
2004b). Initially, tropical sheep from Southeast Asia and a variety of dairy goats were
introduced by colonial administrators and post-colonial settlers in the 1800s
(Quartermain, 2004a). Many of the tropical sheep introduced were lost during the
Second World War, but a flock was gathered by the government livestock officers at
Erap in the 1970s for the purpose of breeding and distribution to smallholder farmers.
Those sheep then became known as Priangan, although they do not resemble the
Indonesian Priangan sheep, but instead resemble the Javanese thin-tailed sheep
(Quartermain, 2004a). In addition, the government attempted to farm temperate
sheep in the highlands (at Aiyura and Nondugal), but high mortality and low fertility
made that venture unsuccessful. In the 1980s, a research and breeding station for
sheep was established in Menifo in the Eastern Highlands Province (EHP) by the PNG
Department of Agriculture and Livestock (DAL), with technical assistance from New
Zealand (Quartermain, 2004a). The aims of the station were to develop suitable sheep
breeds that would perform well in the highlands of PNG, to increase sheep numbers
rapidly and to supply other provincial sheep centres for distribution to smallholder
farmers, especially, in the highlands provinces. The temperate sheep (Corriedale and
Perendale) were imported from New Zealand and crossed with PNG Priangan sheep,
which resulted in a new breed called Highland Halfbred (Quartermain, 2004b). The
Highlands Halfbred now dominates the cooler highlands areas while the PNG Priangan
sheep are raised on warm lowland areas.
Of the various dairy goats introduced during the early colonial period, few
survived in the villages. From those surviving goats, a flock was gathered at the PNG
University of Technology and on DAL stations at Erap and Benabena in 1975; those
goats are now referred to as PNG genotype goats (Quartermain, 2004a). Since then,
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
26
there were small introductions of goats derived from Australian and New Zealand feral
populations to reinforce the highland flocks (Quartermain, 2004a).
Apart from livestock, fish is one of the major economic sources in PNG (Smith,
2007). Many rural villagers living along the coast and major rivers earn their income by
selling fish at local markets. Because of the nutritional value of the fish, recent efforts
of national and international collaborators have encouraged the development of
aquaculture in PNG (Smith, 2007). Freshwater fish farming began in the 1960s with the
introduction of carp (Cyprinus carpio) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and
later in 2002, a genetically improved farmed strain of tilapia (Nile tilapia; Oreochromis
niloticus) was introduced (Smith, 2007). Several major hatcheries were set up,
including the Highlands Aquaculture Development Centre (HAQDEC) and Erap
Aquaculture Centre (EAC) to distribute fingerlings to smallholder farmers throughout
the country (Smith, 2007). HAQDEC produces common carp, Nile tilapia and to a lesser
extent, Java carp (Puntius gonionotus). EAC produces tilapia fingerlings. Trout farmers
obtain their stock from Lake Pindi hatchery or from other smallholder hatcheries and
wild caught trout. There are over 300 smallholder inland fish farms in the country
(Smith, 2007). There is very little known about diseases or pathogens of fish in PNG.
1.1.2 The impact of gastrointestinal parasites on sheep and goats
Parasites are commonly found in sheep and goats and they cause diseases of
major socio-economic importance worldwide. Infections can result in irreversible
damage or even death to the infected sheep and goats (Hepworth et al., 2010). In
addition, animals which are overburdened with parasites can be hindered in their
reproductive performance, experience reduced growth rates and become less
productive overall whether their purpose is meat, fibre or milk (Hepworth et al., 2010).
Furthermore, parasites can cause considerable financial loss. For example, the annual
cost associated with parasitic diseases in sheep and cattle in Australia has been
estimated at more than 1 billion dollars (McLeod, 1995; Sackett and Holmes, 2006). In
tropical and subtropical areas, parasitic nematodes are recognised as a limiting factor
to the expansion and improvement of smallholder production of small ruminants (Al-
Quaisy et al., 1987). In PNG, limiting factors associated with production of sheep and
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
27
goats are generally attributed to lack of management skills and parasitic diseases,
however, studies assessing the economic cost of endemic diseases on profitability of
cattle, sheep or goat producers are lacking.
1.1.3 Gastrointestinal pathogens of sheep and goats
Most species of nematodes and protozoa cause parasitic gastritis and enteritis
in sheep and goats. The most pathogenic (disease causing) nematodes are the stomach
worms (Haemonchus contortus, Teladorsagia (Ostertagia) circumcincta, and
Trichostrongylus axei) and intestinal worms (Trichostrongylus colubriformis,
Trichostrongylus vitrinus, Nematodirus sp., Bunostomum trigonocephalum, and
Oesophagostomum columbianum) (Table 1-1) (Lichtenfels and Hoberg, 1993; Aiello et
al., 2012b). Cooperia curticei, Strongyloides papillosus, Trichuris ovis, and Charbertia
ovina also may be pathogenic in sheep (Table 1-1) (Lichtenfels and Hoberg, 1993; Aiello
et al., 2012b). In addition, lung worms (Dictyocaulus spp. or Muellerius capillaries), liver
flukes (Fasciola hepatica) and cestodes (Moniezia expansia) are also pathogenic to
small ruminants (Villarroel, 2013).
Typical signs of gastrointestinal helminth infections include weight loss,
diarrhoea, rough hair coat, depression, weakness, fever, anaemia, and bottle jaw
(Villarroel, 2013). Parasitic nematodes of livestock are controlled mainly through
anthelmintic treatment. In some areas, optimally-timed (strategic) treatments, are
used, however, this type of control is expensive and in most cases only partially
effective (Gasser et al., 2008). Resistance to anthelmintics has emerged as a major
economic problem (Woodgate and Besier, 2010), despite the development of new
drugs (Kaminsky et al., 2008).
Infection with Eimeria is one of the most economically important diseases of
sheep and goats due to disease (diarrhoea) but also because of subclinical infections
(especially, poor weight gain) (Chartier and Paraud, 2012). The disease caused by
Eimeria is called coccidiosis, which is usually due to acute invasion and destruction of
intestinal mucosa (Aiello et al., 2012a). Eimeria infections can be treated with
coccidiostats (Villarroel, 2013).
Table 1-1: Common gastrointestinal helminths in sheep and goats (Aiello et al., 2012b and Lichtenfels and Hoberg, 1993).
Parasite Superfamily Distribution Organ Damage Clinical signs
Haemonchus contortus Trichostrongyloidea Tropical, subtropical and summer rainfall.
Abomasum Invade tissue, suck blood Submandibular oedema (bottle jaw), anaemia, poor condition
Teladorsagia circumcincta
Trichostrongyloidea Subtropical and winter rainfall
Abomasum Hypertrophy of gastric mucosa
Submandibular oedema, diarrhoea, emaciation
Trichostrongylus spp. Trichostrongyloidea Tropical, subtropical and winter rainfall.
Abomasum, small intestine
Localised necrosis, erode mucosa, minor haemorrhages
Anorexia, diarrhoea, weight loss, depressed growth
Nematodirus spp. Trichostrongyloidea Worldwide Small intestine Disrupts mucus membrane
Unthriftiness, diarrhoea, dehydration
Bunostomum trigocephalum
Ancylostomatidae Worldwide Small intestine Suck blood, penetrate skin Dermatitis, local lesions, diarrhoea, anaemia
Cooperia curticei Trichostrongyloidea Worldwide Small intestine Disrupts mucus membrane
Diarrhoea, anorexia, emaciation
Strongyloides papillosus
Strongyloidae Worldwide Small intestine Suck blood, penetrate skin Dermatitis, local lesions, diarrhoea, anaemia
Trichuris ovis Trichuridae Worldwide Caecum, colon Disrupts mucus membrane
Caecal mucosa oedema, diarrhoea, anaemia
Oesophagostomum columbianum
Strongyloidae Worldwide Caecum, colon Nodules with small abscesses
Diarrhoea, weakness, loss weight
Charbertia ovina Strongyloidae Worldwide Caecum, colon Severe damage to mucosa Unthrifty, soft faeces with streaks of blood
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
Cryptosporidium and Giardia are important intestinal protozoa, which cause
acute or chronic enteric disease in young or immunosuppressed animals. The clinical
symptoms of Cryptosporidium infections in lambs and goat kids are diarrhoea, weight
loss and mortality (de Graaf et al., 1999), while Giardia infections can result in
diarrhoea and impaired weight gain (Aloisio et al., 2006). For both cryptosporidiosis
and giardiasis, the disease is usually mild and self-limited, and supportive care,
primarily hydration, is important (Foreyt, 1990). Only one drug, nitazonaxide, can be
used to treat diarrhoea caused by Cryptosporidium in humans (White, 2004; Fox and
Saravolatz, 2005) and several drugs (metronidazole, tinidazole and nitazoxanide) can
be used to treat Giardia infection in humans (Escobedo and Cimerman, 2007). In
livestock, the following drugs have been used: halofuginone and paromomycin for
treatment of cryptosporidiosis (Fayer and Ellis, 1993; Johnson et al., 2000), and
benzimidazoles (fenbendazole, mebendazole and albendazole) for treatment of
giardiasis (O'Handley et al., 1997; Geurden et al., 2006a; Geurden et al., 2006b;
Geurden et al., 2010a). Control involves strict sanitation and quarantining of infected
animals. In addition to their veterinary importance, Cryptosporidium and Giardia are
well known as zoonotic pathogens and small ruminants have long been considered as
reservoirs for human infections (Geurden et al., 2008b).
Members of the genus Chlamydia cause disease in humans and animals and
most are zoonotic (Everett et al., 1999; Vlahovic et al., 2006). Two species of
Chlamydia have been reported to cause infections in sheep, Chlamydia abortus and
Chlamydia pecorum (Berri et al., 2009; Lenzko et al., 2011). Both are known to cause
abortions in sheep with C. pecorum also known to cause enteritis in sheep (Berri et al.,
2009). Chlamydia abortus, which is the causative agent of enzootic abortion of ewes
(EAE), is also potentially zoonotic (Longbottom and Coulter, 2003; Baud et al., 2008;
Rodolakis and Yousef Mohamad, 2010).
In PNG, previous studies have found a variety of gastrointestinal parasites
including cestodes, nematodes and Eimeria species in sheep and goats (Table 1-2)
(Anderson, 1960; Egerton and Rothwell, 1964; Varghese and Yayabu, 1985; Asiba, 1987;
Owen, 1988, 1989, 1998; Quartermain, 2004b). In the lowlands, H. contortus,
Trichostrongylus spp., Strongyloides, Oesophagostomum and Cooperia were found to
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
30
be dominant, while in the highlands, H. contortus and T. colubriformis were dominant
(Quartermain, 2004b).
Table 1-2: Previously reported gastrointestinal parasites in sheep and goats from PNG (Quartermain, 2004b). * = the presence of a particular parasite in the sheep and goat.
Gastrointestinal Parasite Sheep Goat References
Cestoda
Moniezia expansia * * Anderson, 1960; Egerton and Rothwell, 1964.
Nematoda
Bunostomum trigonocephalum * * Anderson, 1960; Egerton and Rothwell, 1964.
Cooperia curticei * Owen, 1988; Owen, 1998.
Cooperia sp. * * Owen, 1988; Owen, 1998.
Haemonchus contortus * * Anderson, 1960; Egerton and Rothwell, 1964.
Mecistocirrus sp. * Asiba, 1987.
Nematodirus sp. * * Anderson, 1960; Egerton and Rothwell, 1964.
Nematodirus spathiger * Anderson, 1960; Egerton and Rothwell, 1964.
Oesphagostomum venulosum * Anderson, 1960; Egerton and Rothwell, 1964.
Oesphagostomum asperum * Anderson, 1960; Egerton and Rothwell, 1964.
Oesphagostomum columbianum * * Anderson, 1960; Egerton and Rothwell, 1964.
Strongyloides papillosus * * Anderson, 1960; Egerton and Rothwell, 1964.
Trichostrongylus axei * Owen, 1988; Owen, 1998.
Trichostrongylus colubriformis * * Anderson, 1960; Egerton and Rothwell, 1964.
Trichuris globulosa * * Anderson, 1960; Egerton and Rothwell, 1964.
Trichuris ovis * * Owen, 1988; Owen, 1998.
Coccidia
Eimeria ahsata * Varghese and Yayabu, 1985.
Eimeria crandallis * Varghese and Yayabu, 1985.
Eimeria faurei * Varghese and Yayabu, 1985.
Eimeria granulosa * Varghese and Yayabu, 1985.
Eimeria intricata * Varghese and Yayabu, 1985.
Eimeria ovina * Varghese and Yayabu, 1985.
Eimeria ovinoidalis * Varghese and Yayabu, 1985.
Eimeria parva * Varghese and Yayabu, 1985.
1.1.4 Gastrointestinal parasites of fish
All of the major groups of animal parasites are found in fish and healthy, wild
fish often carry heavy parasite burdens. Protozoa such as internal flagellates and
coccidia cause anorexia, weight loss and mortality; cestodes cause sterility;
acanthocephalids cause enteritis and mortality and nematodes such as Capillaria,
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
31
Camillanus, Philometra, Eustrongylides cause weight loss and pot belly (Aiello et al.,
2012c). Worms are often visualised protruding from the anus of the infected fish or
within the viscera of the fish without causing any symptoms in fish (Aiello et al.,
2012c). In farmed fish, poor health management practices, such as high stocking
density and inadequate sanitation has led to a high incidence of parasitic diseases
(Seng et al., 2006). Mass mortalities of juvenile fish due to protozoan and metazoan
parasites are frequently reported (Burkholder et al., 1995; Scholz, 1999). The farm
production loss in 1990 to fish diseases in a variety of fish in both freshwater pond
culture and marine cage culture in developing Asian countries has been estimated to
cost US$1.36 million (ADB/NACA, 1991). In PNG, there is a lack of information on the
effect of disease on fish in cultured systems.
While numerous parasites have been reported in fish, only few are capable of
infecting people. The most important are anisakid nematodes, cestodes and
trematodes, and parasitic infections are associated with the consumption of raw or
undercooked seafood (Chai et al., 2005). Species of the anisakids, particularly, Anisakis
simplex and Pseudoterranova decipiens cause anisakidosis in humans, which is
characterised by abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and allergy (Bouree et al., 1995;
Hochberg and Hamer, 2010). There has been a marked increase in the prevalence of
anisakidosis throughout the world in the last thirty years, due in part to the growing
consumption of raw or lightly cooked seafood (Lymbery and Cheah, 2007). In addition,
Cryptosporidium and Giardia which are known to cause diarrhoea in humans have also
been identified in fish (further details are provided in subsections 1.4.1 and 1.5.1).
1.2 Gastrointestinal parasitic nematodes of sheep and goats
1.2.1 Distribution and taxonomy
The members of the superfamily Trichostrongyloidea are principal parasites of
ruminants. In tropical and subtropical regions, the most economically important
parasitic gastrointestinal nematode of sheep and goats is the abomasal worm
Haemonchus contortus (Waller and Chandrawathani, 2005). Of significance are also
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
32
Teladorsagia (Ostertagia) circumcincta and Trichostrongylus spp. (O'Connor et al.,
2006).
Species belonging to the genus Haemonchus (barber’s pole worm) are the
major abomasal pathogens of ruminants and they have a global distribution (O'Connor
et al., 2006). Haemonchus contortus was first described in 1803 by Karl Rudolphi
(Soulsby, 1982). Twelve species are described within the genus Haemonchus, of which
H. contortus, H. placei and H. similis are found in the abomasa of domesticated
ruminants (Hochberg and Hamer, 2010). Haemonchus contortus is mainly a parasite of
sheep and goats (Love and Hutchinson, 2003). Its principal pathogenic features are its
fourth-stage larvae and adults that feed on host blood and high parasite numbers can
cause fatal anaemia (Love and Hutchinson, 2003).
Species belonging to the genus Teladorsagia (Ostertagia) (small brown stomach
worm) are found in the abomasum of ruminants throughout the world. There are six
described species in this genus of which two, Teladorsagia (Ostertagia) circumcincta
and T. trifurcata, are found in sheep and goats (Lichtenfels et al., 1997). Heavy
infections, if accompanied by Trichostrongylus spp., can cause profuse scouring, ill
thrift and possibly deaths in sheep and goats (Love and Hutchinson, 2003).
Species of the genus Trichostrongylus (black scour worms) are parasites of
birds, ruminants and rodents and are distributed worldwide (Anderson, 2000). There
are 43 known species in this genus of which three species Trichostrongylus axei,
T. colubriformis, and T. vitrinus are commonly found in sheep and goats (Lichtenfels et
al., 1997; Love and Hutchinson, 2003; Rossin et al., 2006). Trichostrongylus axei infects
the abomasum, while T. colubriformis and T. vitrinus infect the intestines and occur in
mixed infections with Ostertagia and produce similar clinical signs (inappetence,
weight loss and scouring) (Love and Hutchinson, 2003).
The overall prevalence rates of gastrointestinal trichostrongylid infections
reported in sheep and goats from tropical and sub-tropical areas are usually very high
(> 20 %) (Dorny et al., 1995; Cheah and Rajamanickam, 1997; Faizal and Rajapakse,
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
33
2001; Maichomo et al., 2004; Regassa et al., 2006; Tariq et al., 2008; Gadahi et al.,
2009; Abebe et al., 2011; Dagnachew et al., 2011).
1.2.2 Life cycle and morphology
Most trichostrongyles have a direct life cycle, which is composed of preparasitic
(free living) and parasitic stages (Fig. 1-1.) (Gasser et al., 2008). Female worms inside
their host produce relatively large numbers of eggs, which are excreted in the faeces
into the external environment. The first-stage larva (L1) develops inside the egg, which
hatches (within 1-2 days, depending on environmental conditions) and develops into
second-stage larva (L2). Both L1 and L2 larvae feed on bacteria and other
microorganisms in the external environment (faeces). L2 in turn moults into the
ensheathed third-stage larva (L3). Sheep and goats become infected when they graze
and eat grasses containing infective L3 larvae. After L3 is ingested by the animal and
passes through the stomach (s), it exsheaths (xL3) and (after a tissue phase) develops
through to fourth-stage larva (L4) and subsequently into the adult at the predilection
site in the alimentary tract (Gasser et al., 2008). The maturation of the worms takes
place on the surface of the mucous membrane. The male and female adults mate and
live in the abomasum or small intestine. Worms can be found attached to the mucosa
or free in the lumen.
The length of time that infective larvae can survive on the pasture is important
for control, especially pasture management programs (Zajac, 2006). The length of time
required for development to the L3 stage varies with temperature and moisture. The
minimum length of time required for the development of H. contortus larvae is about 3
to 4 days (Zajac, 2006). At its early life cycle stages (egg to L3), H. contortus is highly
susceptible to cold and desiccation, high mortality occurs below 10 °C and L3 larvae
require warmth and moisture for transmission (O'Connor et al., 2006). The free living
stages of Trichostrongylus colubriformis however, have intermediate susceptibility to
cold and desiccation with high mortality occurring below 5 °C; survival of L3 larvae
require cool or warm moist weather (O'Connor et al., 2006). In addition, the free living
stages of Teladorsagia circumcincta have low susceptibility to cold and desiccation,
hatching below 5 °C; L3 stages require cool, moist weather and sub-freezing winters
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
34
(O'Connor et al., 2006). The free living stages of Trichostrongylus spp. can develop at
lower temperatures and the larvae may remain dormant until conditions become
favourable for transmission (Aiello et al., 2012b).
The L4 larvae of Haemonchus and Teladorsagia may undergo a period of
arrested development (hypobiosis) in the host, which can be influenced by conditions
in the environment which are unfavourable for development and the survival of eggs
and larvae or immune status of the host (Eysker, 1997).
Figure 1-1: Generalised life cycle of parasitic nematodes (order Strongylida) of the alimentary tract of livestock. (Image from Gasser et al., 2008). Adult female nematodes within the gastrointestinal tract of host animals produce eggs, which are passed out in the faeces. The larvae hatch from the eggs and develop through larval stages L1, L2 and L3 of development. Sheep and goats become infected when they graze and eat grasses containing infective L3 larvae. After the L3 is ingested by the animal and passes through the stomach (s), it exsheaths (xL3) and (after a tissue phase) develops through to fourth-stage (L4) and subsequently into the adult. Specific features of the development of such strongylid nematodes include embryogenesis (E), sexual differentiation (S), sexual reproduction (R), microbial feeding phase (F1), feeding phase inside the alimentary tract (F2), rapid growth phases (G) and the potential to undergo conditional arrested development ( = hypobiosis)(L4*).
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
35
Female H. contortus worms are 18 - 30 mm long and are easily recognised by
the ‘barbers pole’ appearance of the white ovaries and uteri twisting for the length of
the worm around a red blood-filled intestine, while the males are 10 - 20 mm long and
uniformly reddish-brown (Love and Hutchinson, 2003). Teladorsagia are small
brownish worms, of which adult females measure 8 - 12 mm and males 7 - 9 mm (Love
and Hutchinson, 2003). Trichostrongylus axei are very small, slender, hair-like and
reddish-brown worms (females are 5 - 8 mm long and males 4 - 7 mm long) (Love and
Hutchinson, 2003). Intestinal Trichostrongylus spp. (T. columbriformis and T. vitrines)
are small, hair-like reddish brown worms (females 6 - 8 mm and males 6 - 7 mm long)
(Love and Hutchinson, 2003).
1.2.3 Pathogenicity and clinical signs
Haemonchus contortus has a tooth or lancet in its poorly developed oral cavity
to perforate the gastric mucosa and suck blood (Angulo-Cubillan et al., 2007). Both the
L4 larvae and adult H. contortus cause punctiform haemorrhages at feeding sites on
the abomasal mucosa, which may be oedematous (Love and Hutchinson, 2003).
Clinical signs of haemonchosis include anaemia, digestion-absorption syndromes and
weight loss but no diarrhoea (Aiello et al., 2012b).
There are two types of Teladorsagia (Ostertagia) infections in ruminants. In
type I ostertagiosis, which results from recent infection, most worms present are
adults. As the larvae develop and emerge from gastric glands, hyperplasia of gastric
epithelium may cause enlargement and coalescing of nodules, thus mucosal
congestion and oedema is evident with thickening of abomasal folds (Love and
Hutchinson, 2003). Clinical signs include inappetence, scours and rapid weight loss
(Love and Hutchinson, 2003). Type II ostertagiosis, consists of adult worms arising from
simultaneous maturation of many inhibited early L4 larvae, with glandular hyperplasia,
loss of gastric structure, abomasitis, impairment of protein digestion, and leakage of
plasma proteins, especially albumin, into the gut lumen (Love and Hutchinson, 2003).
The mucosa appears thickened and oedematous.
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
36
In Trichostrongylus axei infections, the mucosa of the abomasum may show
congestion and superficial erosions, which are sometimes covered with a
fibrinonecrotic exudate. Intestinal Trichostrongylus spp. (T. columbriformis and
T. vitrines) larvae burrowing in the crypts of intestinal mucosa result in damage of the
mucosa and villus atrophy. The clinical signs of intestinal Trichostrongylus spp. are
similar to those of abomasal Teladorsagia, which include anorexia, persistent
diarrhoea, weight loss, impaired digestion and malabsorption, and protein loss (Love
and Hutchinson, 2003).
1.2.4 Diagnosis
Techniques presently used for the diagnosis of strongylid nematodes infecting
livestock can be presumptive or based on laboratory aids including parasitological,
serological/immunological and DNA-based approaches. Presumptive diagnosis based
on clinical signs including diarrhoea, anaemia, mortality or decreased fertility, reduced
body weight, meat, milk and/or wool production in the host alone is unreliable, can be
complicated in cases of mixed species infections and does not specifically detect or
identify the causative agent (Gasser et al., 2008).
A diagnostic tool called FAffa MAlan CHArt (FAMACHA) method is sometimes
used, in which only certain sheep or goats in the flock are selected for treatment
against H. contortus (van Wyk and Bath, 2002). FAMACHA is a standard colour chart
that is used for assessing or scoring the level of anaemia by comparison of the colour
of the inner lower eyelid and then deciding which individuals in a flock should be
selectively treated for haemonchosis (van Wyk and Bath, 2002).
Serological and immunological (e.g., coproantigen detection) approaches have
been assessed for the specific diagnosis of nematode infections, however cross-
reactivity using antigens of related parasites can occur, reducing the specificity of
these methods as a diagnostic test (Johnson et al., 1996; Larsen et al., 1997; Johnson
et al., 2004).
Parasitological approaches involve the identification of strongylid nematodes
(at any developmental stage) on the basis of morphological characters. This approach
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
37
includes direct faecal smears, faecal flotations and post-mortem. A direct faecal smear
can be examined to indicate the presence of parasite eggs. However, faecal flotations
techniques are the primary laboratory test used for detection of nematode eggs and
for determination of the parasite load of an animal by quantification of the worm egg
per gram (EPG) of faeces. Faecal flotation techniques involve separation and
concentration of eggs from faecal samples and identification based on egg morphology
using light microscope (Dryden et al., 2005). The drawback of faecal worm egg counts
is that EPG does not represent an accurate indication of the number of adult worms
present and specific identification of strongylid nematode eggs is impractical due to
close similarities in the morphology of ova (Gasser et al., 2008). EPG counts can be
negative or low in the presence of large numbers of immature and adults worms,
which are suppressed by host immune reactions or recent anthelmintic treatment
(Aiello et al., 2012b). Also, variations in the egg-producing capability of different
worms (significantly lower for Teladorsagia and Trichostrongylus than Haemonchus)
may misrepresent the true worm burden (Aiello et al., 2012b). To achieve genus-level
identification, L3 larvae can be produced from eggs in the faeces using the method of
larval culture. For these, faecal samples are processed and incubated to hatch eggs and
the resulting larva identified (Corner and Bagust, 1993). The disadvantage of larval
cultures is that the yields are never 100 % (Eysker and Ploeger, 2000); it is unreliable
for establishing the relative abundance of eggs from different species present in the
faecal sample as their survival rates and development can vary, depending on culture
conditions (Dobson et al., 1992). Also, it is time-consuming, (requiring 1-2 weeks for
eggs to hatch and larvae to develop to L3 stage, depending on conditions) and requires
an experienced microscopist to identify and distinguish L3 larvae (Gasser et al., 2008).
Routine post-mortem examinations can provide valuable data about the status of the
rest of the herd or flock (Aiello et al., 2012b). It can be performed on “traces”
(parasite-naïve fully susceptible animals that graze with the herd/flock for a short
period) or selecting sentinel animals from the herd/flock (Eysker and Ploeger, 2000).
The faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) is used to assess the efficacy of
anthelmintic against gastrointestinal strongylids, but it is not suitable for confirmation
of clinical diagnosis (Eysker and Ploeger, 2000).
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
38
A wide range of molecular approaches, based on polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) techniques, are used for the specific diagnosis of nematodes including restriction
fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), mutation scanning, PCR and DNA sequencing
(Gasser et al., 2008). More recently, molecular methods including quantitative PCR
(qPCR) for the genus- or species-specific diagnosis of strongylid infections in livestock
have been developed (Zarlenga et al., 2001; Siedek et al., 2006; Harmon et al., 2007a;
Harmon et al., 2007b; Bott et al., 2009; Learmount et al., 2009; von Samson-
Himmelstjerna et al., 2009; Roeber et al., 2011; Sweeny et al., 2011a; Burgess et al.,
2012; Roeber et al., 2012a; Roeber et al., 2012b; Demeler et al., 2013; McNally et al.,
2013). Some of these studies have used copro-culture of larvae or eggs purified from
faecal samples and then used PCR analysis to determine the presence/absence of
selected strongylid species (Zarlenga et al., 2001; von Samson-Himmelstjerna et al.,
2002; Harmon et al., 2006; Siedek et al., 2006; Harmon et al., 2007b; Bott et al., 2009;
Burgess et al., 2012). However, the time and labour required for egg or larvae
purification is time-consuming and is subject to the limitations described above.
1.2.5 Treatment and control
Clinically affected animals due to infections with parasitic worms can be
treated with drugs (chemotherapy agents), commonly known as anthelmintics.
Anthelmintics either kill egg-laying adults, or kill larvae before they become adults and
become capable of laying eggs. Three families of anthelmintic drugs; (i) benzimidazoles
(fenbendazole and albendazole), (ii) nicotinic agonist consisting of imidazothiaoles and
tetrahydropyrimidines (levamisole, pyrantel and morantel), and (iii) macrocylic
lactones comprising avermectins (ivermectin, doramectin and eprinomectin) and
milbemycins (moxidectin) are available for deworming small ruminants (Schoenian,
2010).
The main goal in attempting to control gastrointestinal parasites is to break the
life cycle, which can be done in a variety of ways including the use of anthelmintics,
animal management and pasture management. Anthelmintics are predominantly used
to control internal parasitic worms and they can be used to reduce pasture
contamination. It is recommended that after treating animals for parasites, they
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
39
should be left in the original pasture for a couple of days before rotating or keep them
on a dry lot for 12 - 24 h after deworming, to ensure the eggs and larvae that survived
the anthelmintics are not deposited on safe pasture (Hepworth et al., 2010). In some
areas, optimally-timed (strategic) treatments, are used, however, this type of control is
expensive and in most cases are partially effective (Gasser et al., 2008). Anthelmintic
drugs have to be used sparingly to control parasites in sheep and goats as frequent use
may enable the worms to become resistant to drugs and also they are costly.
Resistance to anthelmintics has emerged as a major economic problem in many parts
of the world (Wolstenholme et al., 2004; Coles, 2006; Woodgate and Besier, 2010).
Pasture management is a non-chemical way to control nematodes. Pastures are
allowed enough time to rest so that lower numbers of larvae are infective and will not
be a problem to the grazing animal (Hepworth et al., 2010). However, good pasture
management cannot entirely eliminate the parasite problem and therefore good
rotational grazing techniques combined with an anthelmintic program are required;
the success of which will depend on the level of anthelmintic resistance in a particular
flock (Hepworth et al., 2010).
1.3 Eimeria
1.3.1 Distribution and taxonomy
Apicomplexan parasites that belong to the genus Eimeria, infect a wide range
of vertebrate hosts, worldwide (McDonald and Shirley, 2009). The taxonomy of species
in this genus is controversial due to phenotypic characters traditionally used for the
classification of eimeriid coccidia (including the morphology of available parasite
stages and host specificity) (Tenter et al., 2002). Eimeria spp. are thought to be host-
specific and are not transmitted from sheep to goats (McDougald, 1979). In temperate
areas, twelve species have been reported in sheep; E. ovinoidalis and E. weybridgensis
(syn. E. crandallis) are most prevalent, followed by, E. ahsata, E. bakuensis, E. faurei, E.
granulosa, E. intricata, E. marsica, E. parva and E. pallida (Reeg et al., 2005; Dittmar et
al. 2010). Nine species are commonly reported in goats with E. ninakohlyakimovae, E.
arloingi, and E. alijevi being the most frequent species, followed by E. caprina, E.
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
40
christenseni, E. jolchijevi, E. caprovina, E. hirci and E. apsheronica (Norton, 1986;
Koudela and Bokova, 1998; Balicka-Ramisz, 1999; Harper and Penzhorn, 1999; Ruiz et
al., 2006; Chartier and Paraud, 2012). Eimeria have been found in sheep and/or goats
in tropical and subtropical areas including PNG (Varghese and Yayabu, 1985), Senegal
(Vercruysse, 1982), Ghana (Nuvor et al., 1998), Nigeria (Woji et al., 1994), Kenya
(Kanyari, 1993; Maingi and Munyua, 1994), Zimbabwe (Chhabra and Pandey, 1991), Sri
Lanka (Faizal and Rajapakse, 2001), Turkey (Abdurrahman, 2007) and Brazil
(Cavalcante et al., 2011). The prevalence of Eimeria can reach up to > 85 % in both
sheep and goats (Wang et al., 2010a).
Of all the Eimeria species, the most pathogenic in sheep are E. ovinoidalis and
E. crandallis (usually in 1-6 month old lambs) with E. ovina being less pathogenic (Aiello
et al., 2012c). In goats, E. arloingi, E. christenseni and E. ovinoidalis are highly
pathogenic, especially, in kids (Aiello et al., 2012c).
1.3.2 Life cycle and morphology
Eimeria has a complex life cycle (which includes three stages, sporogony,
schizogony/merogony and gamogony) and requires only one host (Fig. 1-2). Sporogony
is the maturation of the oocyst, which occurs outside the host, while schizogony (the
asexual proliferation) and gamogony (sexual multiplication) are parasitic endogenous
phases that occur within the host (Soulsby, 1982). The infected host excretes
unsporulated oocysts (not infective) into the environment with the faeces. After 2 - 7
days, depending on the species of Eimeria and the environmental conditions (such as
moisture, oxygen and temperature), the oocysts sporulate (sporogony) (Chartier and
Paraud, 2012).
Once the sporulated oocyst is ingested by a suitable host, the oocyst excyst and
releases sporozoites in the intestine. Each sporozoite then penetrates an epithelial cell
of the small intestine, where it transforms into a schizont (Chartier and Paraud, 2012).
The schizont undergoes schizogony to produce merozoites. The merozoites released
from the schizont can either re-initiate asexual reproduction or develop into sexual
stages called micro (male) and macro (female) gametocytes (Chartier and Paraud,
2012).
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
41
Figure 1-2: Life cycle of Eimeria species. Top (1): Schematic representation of the life cycle of Eimeria in an infected mammal. Once oocysts are ingested by a host (a), they release sporozoites (b), which invade the epithelial cells lining the intestine (c-e). This invasion may occur from 1 - 6 h after the ingestion occurs. After invasion, the sporozoites undergo replication, which leads to a rapid increase in another stage of the parasite called merozoites (f). The merozoites invade more cells of the gut, multiplying once again (g-i). The effects of coccidiosis are generally associated with the lysing of host epithelial cells by merozoites. Some merozoites develop into the sexual stages called micro (male) and macro (female) gametocytes (j). These develop into micro- and macrogametes, which fuse to form a zygote (o-r). The zygote develops into an oocyst that is eventually released in the faeces (t). The oocysts first undergo further development (sporulation) in the litter to become infectious (u-x). Bottom (2): Illustration of a fully-formed (sporulated) oocyst (a, c) and sporocyst (b, d). (Adapted from Entzeroth et al., 1998; Lindsay and Todd Jnr., 1993; Sam-Yellowe, 1996).
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
42
A zygote is formed when micro and macro gametes fuse together (gamogony)
and develops into an oocyst (non-sporulated), which is eventually released in the
faeces. The oocysts first undergo further development (sporulation) in the litter and
are resistant to environmental extremes. Once sporulation is completed, the
sporozoites within the oocysts are immediately infective to the next suitable host
animals that may ingest them.
For pathogenic species, such as E. ninakohlyakimovae and E. ovinoidalis, the
first schizogony takes place in the ileum (10 days post infection), the second in the
crypt cells of the caecum (12 days post infection) and the colon, and eventually
gamogony occurs in the large intestine (13 days post infection), with a prepatent
period of 15 days (Chartier and Paraud, 2012).
The oocysts of Eimeria from sheep and goats are generally ovoid to ellipsoid in
shape, their length ranges from 13 - 51 µm and width from 11 - 37 µm, and may
contain specialized structures, such as polar caps, micropyles, residual and crystalline
bodies (Vercruysse, 1982).
1.3.3 Pathogenicity and clinical signs
In sheep, Eimeria mostly affects the ileum, cecum and upper colon, which may
be thickened, oedematous and inflamed; sometimes, there is mucosal haemorrhage
(Aiello et al., 2012a). Clinical signs include diarrhoea (sometimes, containing blood or
mucus), dehydration, fever, inappetence, weight loss, anaemia, wool breaking and
death (Aiello et al., 2012a). In goats, stages and lesions are usually confined to the
small intestine, which may appear congested, haemorrhagic or ulcerated, and have
pale, yellow to white macroscopic plaques in the mucosa (Aiello et al., 2012a).
1.3.4 Diagnosis
Coccidiosis is suspected when there are digestive troubles in young animals
bred under poor hygienic conditions, intensive breeding or sudden mortality. In
epidemiological settings, a poor growth rate can suggest a diagnosis of subclinical
coccidiosis (Chartier and Paraud, 2012). Traditional diagnosis of Eimeria species is
based on oocyst morphology, host specificity, and pathology or examination of the gut
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
43
after necropsy (Tenter et al., 2002; Chartier and Paraud, 2012). Coproscopical
examination also includes quantitation of oocysts using sodium chloride (NaCl) or
magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) flotation (Chartier and Paraud, 2012). In recent years,
there have been numerous studies, which have used molecular data based on 18S
ribosomal RNA (18S rRNA) sequences to discriminate the species of Eimeria (Power et
al., 2009; Gibson-Kueh et al., 2011).
1.3.5 Treatment and control
The control of coccidiosis relies on preventative measures such as good
hygienic conditions, reduction of stressors, an adequate nutrition and the use of
anticoccidial drugs (Chartier and Paraud, 2012). Anticoccidial products belong to a
number of chemical families with different modes of action on the endogenous phase
of life cycle and these include sulphonamides, amprolium, ionophores, decoquinate,
toltrazuril and diclazuril (Chartier and Paraud, 2012).
The greatest risk for transmission of oocysts for young lambs and goat kids (1 -
6 months old) include lambing pens, intensive grazing areas, feedlots, ration change,
crowding stress, severe weather, and contamination of the environment with oocysts
from infected ewes and does (Aiello et al., 2012a). Under management systems where
coccidiosis is predictable, it is recommended to administer anticoccidials
prophylactically for 28 consecutive days beginning a few days after the lambs or goat
kids are introduced into the area (Aiello et al., 2012a).
1.4 Cryptosporidium
1.4.1 Distribution and taxonomy
Cryptosporidium is an apicomplexan protozoan parasite, which invades the
gastrointestinal and respiratory epithelium of a wide range of vertebrate species, and
may cause considerable economic losses in livestock (Sreter and Varga, 2000; Fayer,
2008). Infections in immunocompetent individuals are usually self-limiting, but they
can be life-threatening in immunocompromised individuals (O'Donoghue, 1995).
Cryptosporidium developmental stages were first discovered in the gastric
glands of laboratory mice by Ernest Edward Tyzzer (Tyzzer, 1907, 1910). The species,
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
44
which was given the name Cryptosporidium muris, was later found to infect the gastric
glands of several other mammals, but not humans. Tyzzer identified a second species
(C. parvum) in 1912, which was found to infect the small intestine of laboratory mice
(Tyzzer, 1912). The impact of Cryptosporidium on animal health was not recognised
until its association with diarrhoea in 1950s in young turkeys due to C. meleagridis and
in the 1970s in calves due to C. parvum (Slavin, 1955; Panciera et al., 1971).
Cryptosporidium infection has been implicated in numerous waterborne and
foodborne outbreaks associated with human and livestock diseases (Smith and Rose,
1998; Smith et al., 2007; Budu-Amoako et al., 2011). Since the first description of
C. muris, numerous species of the genus Cryptosporidium were described based on the
animal hosts from which they were isolated, however, subsequent morphological,
cross-transmission and genetic studies have invalidated many species (Egyed et al.,
2003; Xiao et al., 2004). The taxonomic status and naming of this genus is constantly
changing as new information based on molecular data is published. At present, there
are at least 27 valid species of the genus Cryptosporidium and over 40 different
isolates or genotypes (Fayer et al., 2008; Robertson, 2009; Xiao, 2010; Ryan and Xiao,
2013).
In sheep, eight species and several genotypes have been identified including
C. parvum, C. ubiquitum, C. xiaoi, C. andersoni, C. hominis, C. fayeri, C. suis and
C. scrofarum with C. xiaoi, C. ubiquitum and C. parvum most prevalent (Ryan et al.,
2005; Goma et al., 2007; Karanis et al., 2007; Santin et al., 2007; Soltane et al., 2007;
Fayer et al., 2008; Geurden et al., 2008b; Mueller-Doblies et al., 2008; Quilez et al.,
2008; Fayer and Santin, 2009; Giles et al., 2009; Paoletti et al., 2009; Yang et al., 2009;
Diaz et al., 2010a; Robertson et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2010b; Xiao, 2010; Fiuza et al.,
2011; Shen et al., 2011; Sweeny et al., 2011b; Caccio et al., 2013; Connelly et al., 2013;
Imre et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2013). Three of these species (C. parvum, C. hominis and
C. xiaoi) have also been identified in goats (Giles et al., 2009; Diaz et al., 2010b; Fayer
et al., 2010; Robertson et al., 2010).
Cryptosporidium has a global distribution. Cryptosporidium infections in sheep
have been reported in numerous studies in Europe (Belgium, Czech Republic, Italy,
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
45
Poland, Portugal, Spain and UK), Americas (Brazil, Mexico, Trinidad, Tobago, USA and
Canada), Australia, Asia (Iraq, Iran, Oman, Sri Lanka and Taiwan) and Africa (Egypt and
Zambia) with cross-sectional prevalence range from < 5 % to > 70 % (mean ~30 %,
n = 20) (Robertson, 2009; Fiuza et al., 2011). Although, fewer epidemiological studies
have examined Cryptosporidium spp. in goats, it appears that prevalence is similarly
variable, with values of < 10 % to > 40 % reported (Robertson, 2009). Cryptosporidium
infections in goats have been reported in Europe (Belgium, France, Spain and UK), the
Americas (Brazil, Trinidad, and Tobago), Asia (Iraq, Sri Lanka and Taiwan) and Africa
(Zambia) (Giles et al., 2009; Robertson, 2009). It has been diagnosed in outbreaks of
diarrhoea and often deaths in goat kids and lambs (< 6 months old) in Australia and
several European countries (de Graaf et al., 1999).
Cryptosporidium has been described in more than 17 species of both
freshwater and marine fish, with prevalence rates of < 1 % to 100 % (Alvarez-Pellitero
and Sitja-Bobadilla, 2002; Alvarez-Pellitero et al., 2004; Ryan et al., 2004; Murphy et
al., 2009; Reid et al., 2010; Zanguee et al., 2010; Morine et al., 2012). Parasitic stages
have been reported to be located deep within and on the surface of the stomach or
intestinal epithelium (Alvarez-Pellitero and Sitja-Bobadilla, 2002; Alvarez-Pellitero et
al., 2004; Ryan et al., 2004; Murphy et al., 2009; Reid et al., 2010; Zanguee et al., 2010;
Morine et al., 2012). Currently, the only recognised species infecting fish is
Cryptosporidium molnari, which was identified in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata)
and European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labarx) (Alvarez-Pellitero and Sitja-Bobadilla,
2002) and was characterised genetically in 2010 (Palenzuela et al., 2010).
Cryptosporidium molnari primarily infects the epithelium of the stomach and seldom
the intestine (Alvarez-Pellitero and Sitja-Bobadilla 2002). In 2004, C. scophthalmi was
described in turbot (Psetta maxima. sny. Scopthalmus maximus) (Alvarez-Pellitero and
Sitja-Bobadilla, 2002; Alvarez-Pellitero et al., 2004). However, no genetic sequences
are available for C. scophthalmi and it can thus not be considered a valid species due to
the high genetic heterogeneity and morphological similarity among Cryptosporidium
species in fish. In addition to C. molnari, a total of 3 species and 10 genotypes have
been characterised genetically in fish (Table 1-3).
Table 1-3: Species/genotypes of Cryptosporidium reported in fish in previous studies. N = the number of specimens in which each species/genotype of Cryptosporidium was identified. Fish host scientific name in italics and common name in brackets.
Species/genotype N Fish host Reference
C. molnari > 100 Sparus aurata (Gilt head sea bream) and Dicentrarchus labarx (European seabass)
Alvarez-Pellitero and Sitja-Bobadilla, 2002; Palenzuela et al., 2010
C. scophthalmi 49 Scopthalmus maximus (Turbot) Alvarez-Pellitero and Sitja-Bobadilla, 2002; Alvarez-Pellitero et al., 2004
C. molnari -like 7 Monodactylus argenteus (Butter bream), Pseudanthias dispar (madder seaperch), Ctenochaetus tominiensis (bristle tooth tang), Synodontis nigriventris (upsidedown catfish), Paracanthurus hepatus (wedgetailed blue tang), Chromis viridis (green chromis) and Gyrinocheilus aymonieri (golden algae eater).
Zanguee et al., 2010
Piscine genotype 1 2 Poecilia reticulate (Guppy) and Paracheirodon innesi (neon tetra) Ryan et al., 2004; Zanguee et al., 2010
Piscine genotype 2 > 5 Pterophyllum scalare (Angelfish), Paracheirodon innesi (neon tetra) and Astronatus ocellatis (Oscar fish).
Murphy et al., 2009; Zanguee et al., 2010
Piscine genotype 3 2 Mugil cephalus (Sea mullet) Reid et al., 2010
Piscine genotype 4 4 aymonieri (Golden algae eater), Chrysiptera hemicyanes (kupang damsel), Astronatus ocellatis (Oscar fish) and Paracheirodon innesi (neon tetra)
Zanguee et al., 2010; Morine et al., 2012
Piscine genotype 5 3 Pterophyllum scalare (Angelfish), Monodactylus argenteus (butter bream) and Gyrinocheilus aymonieri (golden algae eater).
Zanguee et al., 2010
Piscine genotype 6 1 Poecilia reticulate (Guppy) Zanguee et al., 2010
Piscine genotype 6-like 1 Trichogaster trichopterus (Gold gourami) Morine et al., 2012 Piscine genotype 7 3 Moenkhausia sanctaefilomenae (Red-eye tetra) Morine et al., 2012
Rat genotype 3-like 1 Carassius auratus (Goldfish) Morine et al., 2012
C. scrofarum 2 Sillago vittata (School whiting) Reid et al., 2010
C. parvum 1 Sillago vittata (School whiting Reid et al., 2010
C. xiaoi 1 Sillago vittata (School whiting Reid et al., 2010
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
Approximately 15 species of Cryptosporidium have been identified in humans,
but 5 species including C. hominis, C. parvum, C. meleagridis, C. felis and C. canis are
responsible for most human cryptosporidiosis cases (Xiao and Feng, 2008). Prevalence
rates of Cryptosporidium infections in humans ranged as low as 1 % in Europe and
North America to 30 % in other countries and pooled data from developed countries
showed an average of 2.1 %, while in developing countries, the average prevalence
was 6.1 % (Franzen and Muller, 1999). Recently, Cryptosporidium was identified as one
of the main causes of serious diarrhoea in children in developing countries (Kotloff et
al., 2013).
1.4.2 Life cycle and morphology
Transmission occurs via an environmentally robust oocyst (Fig. 1-3), which is
excreted in the faeces of the infected host (Franzen and Muller, 1999).
Cryptosporidium is capable of completing all stages of its life cycle within an individual
host (Fig. 1-4). Once ingested, the oocyst excysts in the gastrointestinal tract and
releases infective sporozoites, which subsequently attach to the epithelial cells of the
small intestine and they become enclosed within parasitophorous vacuoles
(O'Donoghue, 1995). The sporozoites develop into trophozoites, which then undergo
asexual proliferation by merogony into two types of meronts (type I and type II
meronts). Type I meronts form 8 merozoites, which are liberated from the
parasitophorous vacuole when mature and type II meronts form 4 merozoites, which
produce sexual reproductive stages (called gamonts) (O'Donoghue, 1995). Type I
merozoites can cause autoinfection by attaching to epithelial cells or developing into
Type II merozoites, which initiate sexual multiplication (Chen et al., 2002). Type II
merozoites attach to the epithelial cells, where they become either macrogamonts or
microgamonts (Chen et al., 2002). Microgamonts develop into microgametocytes,
which produce up to 16 non-flagellated microgametes (O'Donoghue, 1995).
Macrogamonts develop into uninucleate macrogametocytes, which are fertilized by
mature microgametes (sexual reproduction) (O'Donoghue, 1995). The resultant
zygotes undergo further asexual development (sporogony) leading to the production
of sporulated oocysts (O'Donoghue, 1995). While most oocysts are thick-walled and
are excreted in the faecal material, some are thin-walled and have been reported to
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
48
encyst within the same host animal. These auto-infective oocysts and recycling type I
meronts are believed to be the means by which persistent chronic infections may
develop in hosts without further exposure to exogenous oocysts (O'Donoghue, 1995).
The entire life cycle may be completed in 2 days in many hosts and infections may be
short-lived or may persist for several months (O'Donoghue, 1995). The prepatent
period, which is, the time between infection and oocysts excretion, ranges from 2 - 14
days.
The oocysts are spherical to ovoid and measure 3 - 8 µm in diameter (Fig. 1-3)
(World Organisation for Animal Health-OIE, 2008; Ryan, 2010). Each sporulated oocyst
contains four, flat, thin, motile, crescent-shaped sporozoites and a residuum
composed of numerous small granules and a spherical or ovoid membrane-bound
globule (Fayer and Ungar, 1986). Trophozoites are round or oval intracellular forms
which are found within a parasitophorous vacuole surrounded by host cell membrane
(Fayer and Ungar, 1986).
Figure 1-3: A scanning electron micrograph of Cryptosporidium parasites lining the intestinal tract (Photo courtesy U.S. Department of Agriculture) (Gardiner et al., 1988).
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
49
Figure 1-4: Life cycle of Cryptosporidium parvum and C. hominis (Image from CDC http://www.cdc.gov/ Retrieved 26th October 2013). Sporulated oocysts with 4 sporozoites each are excreted by infected host (either human or animal) through faeces (1). Cryptosporidium oocyst is generally transmitted through contact with contaminated drinking or recreational water (2). After the parasite is ingested (3), excystation occurs and the sporozoites are released from oocysts (a, b). The sporozoites infect epithelial cells of the gastrointestinal tract. In these cells, the parasite undergoes asexual multiplication (schizogony or merogony) (d, e, f) and then sexual multiplication, or gametogony, producing microgamonts (males) (g) and macrogamonts (h). When the macrogamont is fertilized by the microgametes (i), oocysts (j, k) develop that sporulate in the infected hosts. Two different types of oocysts are produced, the thick-walled, which is commonly excreted from the host (j), and the thin-walled oocyst (k), which is primarily involved in autoinfection.
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
1.4.3 Pathogenicity and clinical signs
Cryptosporidium spp. attach intimately to the microvillus membrane of surface
epithelia of the intestinal tract and cause a range of histologic abnormalities in crypt
and villous structure, including villous atrophy and crypt hyperplasia, which are usually
accompanied by inflammatory responses (Chen et al., 2002).
The main clinical sign of cryptosporidiosis is diarrhoea accompanied by the
shedding of a large number of oocysts (de Graaf et al., 1999). High morbidity and
mortality have been reported in lambs and goat kids, especially, the neonates (Fayer
and Ungar, 1986; de Graaf et al., 1999). Clinical signs of ovine cryptosporidiosis include
diarrhoea, which can last from 2 - 12 days and is sometimes accompanied by anorexia,
poor growth, stiffness, hyperpnoea, slow gait, limb muscle fasciculations and
depression (Fayer and Ungar, 1986). In fish, Cryptosporidium can cause high morbidity
with clinical signs including variable levels of emaciation, poor growth rates, swollen
coelomic cavities, anorexia, listlessness and increased mortality (Murphy et al., 2009).
In humans, although infections can be asymptomatic, most patients have profuse
watery diarrhoea and the duration and severity of clinical symptoms depend largely on
the immune status of infected person (Chen et al., 2002). It can result in life-
threatening diseases in immunodeficient people, especially, AIDS patients (Current et
al., 1983).
1.4.4 Diagnosis
A variety of laboratory tests have been developed for the differential diagnosis
of cryptosporidiosis. These include microscopic, immunologic and molecular detection
of the parasite in the faeces and histological examination of autopsy or biopsy
material. Endogenous developmental stages of Cryptosporidium can be diagnosed
from autopsy or biopsy material after staining with haematoxylin and eosin or Giemsa
and examined under light and/or scanning electron microscopes (O'Donoghue, 1995).
In addition, histological techniques may be used to investigate pathological and
cytological changes accompanying infections, however, these are not recommended
for routine diagnosis (O'Donoghue, 1995).
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
51
Oocysts in faecal material can be detected by examining stained faecal smears.
There are numerous staining methods available including direct, differential, acid-fast,
fluorochrome and negative staining techniques, which have been described to stain
the walls and/or contents of mature oocysts (O'Donoghue, 1995). Acid-fast staining is
the simplest and a widely used method for detecting oocysts in faecal material,
however, like other conventional microscopic examination methods, the drawback is
that oocysts can be difficult to recover and identify because of their small size and
frequent similarities of their morphological features (i.e. size, shape and internal
structures) (O'Donoghue, 1995; Chen et al., 2002). The sensitivity and specificity of
microscopic examination methods can be improved with sedimentation and flotation
techniques prior to microscopy, and immunological-based techniques such as
immunofluorescent antibody tests and antigen-capture ELISAs (Chen et al., 2002).
However, antibody techniques suffer from lack of specificity and in the last two
decades, numerous molecular techniques have been developed for detection and
differentiation of Cryptosporidium at species/genotype and subtype level.
Molecular tools are widely used in epidemiological studies of cryptosporidiosis
in endemic and epidemic areas, in which they have improved the understanding of
transmission of cryptosporidiosis in humans and animals (Xiao, 2010). Different types
of molecular tools have been used for the differentiation of Cryptosporidium
species/genotypes or subtypes. 18S rRNA-based tools are extensively used in
genotyping Cryptosporidium in humans, animals and water samples (Xiao, 2010). The
widespread use of the 18S rRNA gene in genotyping Cryptosporidium is largely due to
the multi-copy nature of the gene and the presence of semi-conserved and hyper-
variable regions, which facilitate the design of genus-specific primers (Xiao, 2010).
Other genes are also used in combination with 18S rRNA-based tools including oocysts
the actin gene, the heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) gene, and the 60 kDA glycoprotein
gene (gp60) (Table 1-4) (Caccio et al., 2005).
The typing and subtyping methods used for veterinary samples are important
for veterinary and public health applications. Currently, subtyping tools are only
applicable to C. parvum, C. hominis, C. cuniculus, C. ubiquitum, C. tyzzeri and C. fayeri
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
52
and have been used extensively in studies of the transmission of C. hominis in humans
and C. parvum in humans and ruminants (Xiao, 2010; Li et al., 2014). One gene that is
popular for subtyping Cryptosporidium is gp60. The gp60 gene has variations in the
number of trinucleotide repeats and extensive sequence differences in the non-repeat
regions, which categorize C. parvum and C. hominis to several subtype families (Xiao,
2010). It is similar to a microsatellite sequence by having tandem repeats of the serine-
coding trinucleotide TCA, TCG or TCT at the 5’ end of the gene (Xiao, 2010).
Table 1-4: Molecular techniques for characterising Cryptosporidium. RFLP = restriction fragment length polymorphism; Hsp70 = heat shock protein 70; COWP = Cryptosporidium oocyst wall protein gene; gp60 = 60 kDa glycoprotein gene. (Adapted from Caccio et al., 2005).
Amplification target Assay type Identification for
18S rDNA PCR, nested PCR, sequencing, PCR-RFLP, qPCR, microarray
Species & genotype
Hsp70 PCR, nested PCR, sequencing, PCR-RFLP, microarray
Species & genotype
COWP PCR, nested PCR, sequencing, PCR-RFLP, microarray
Species & genotype
Actin PCR, nested PCR, sequencing Species & genotype
β-Tubulin PCR, nested PCR, sequencing, PCR-RFLP Species & genotype
gp60 PCR, nested PCR, sequencing Subtype
Microsatellites PCR, nested PCR, sequencing, fragment typing
Subtype
Minisatellites PCR, nested PCR, sequencing, fragment typing
Subtype
Extra-chromosomal double stranded RNA
Reverse transcriptase PCR, sequencing, heteroduplex mobility assays
Subtype
1.4.5 Treatment and control
There is no effective specific treatment for cryptosporidiosis in sheep and
goats, however, because the disease is usually self-limiting, supportive therapy, such
as rehydration and maintenance of energy requirements, is usually sufficient.
Preliminary results obtained in calves, lambs and goat kids infected by Cryptosporidium
sp. have indicated a partial prophylactic efficacy of halofuginone lactate when
administered at 100 μg/kg body weight (BW) (De Waele et al., 2010). Recently, an
efficacy demonstration study showed that halofuginone lactate, which when given as a
prophylactic treatment at 100 μg/kg BW, reduced oocyst shedding, diarrhoea and
mortality in goat kid cryptosporidiosis (Petermann et al., 2014).
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
53
1.5 Giardia
1.5.1 Distribution and taxonomy
Giardia is a flagellated protozoan parasite and is one of the most common
nonviral causes of diarrhoea in humans and livestock worldwide (Thompson et al.,
2000). The parasite was first observed by Van Leeuwenhoek in 1681 (Dobell, 1920) and
more fully described by Lamb in 1859 (Lamb, 1859). There are six recognised species in
the genus Giardia (1952-2007); Giardia duodenalis (syn. G. intestinalis, G. lamblia) in
mammals, G. agilis in amphibians, G. muris and G. microti in rodents, and G. ardeae
and G. psittaci in birds (Monis et al., 2009). Giardia duodenalis is frequently found in
livestock, companion animals and humans (Xiao and Fayer, 2008). Within this species,
there are eight morphologically identical but genetically distinct genotypes or
assemblages designated A – H (Thompson, 2004; Lasek-Nesselquist et al., 2010) with
assemblages A and B known to infect a wide range of hosts including humans,
livestock, cats, dogs and other mammals (Thompson, 2004; Xiao and Fayer, 2008).
Assemblages C and D infect dogs, assemblage E infects livestock (cattle, sheep, pigs),
assemblage F infects cat, assemblage G infects domestic rats and assemblage H infects
marine vertebrates (Thompson, 2004; Lasek-Nesselquist et al., 2010).
In small ruminants, especially, lambs and goat kids, giardiasis can cause
significant economic losses (O'Handley et al., 2001; Aloisio et al., 2006). The prevalence
of Giardia ranged from 2.7 - 68.8 % in sheep and 4.0 - 42.2 % in goats (Robertson,
2009). Based on genotyping analyses in the last decade, G. duodenalis assemblage E
was found to be the most prevalent genotype in sheep and goats, with assemblage A
and B less prevalent in Australia (Ryan et al., 2005; Yang et al., 2009; Sweeny et al.,
2011b), USA (Santin et al., 2007), Belgium (Geurden et al., 2008b), Italy (Giangaspero
et al., 2005; Aloisio et al., 2006), The Netherlands (van der Giessen et al., 2006) and
Spain (Castro-Hermida et al., 2006; Ruiz et al., 2008; Gomez-Munoz et al., 2009).
Although Giardia has been reported in seals, sea lions, a shark and clams, very
little is known about the prevalence, genetic diversity and effect of Giardia species in
marine or freshwater systems and the role that aquatic animals play in transmission of
these parasites to human (Yang et al., 2010). In fish, prevalences of 3.8 % and 3.3 %
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
54
have been reported and G. duodenalis assemblages A, B, E and G. microti have been
found (Yang et al., 2010; Ghoneim et al., 2011).
In humans, giardiasis is a well-recognised waterborne disease in both
developed and undeveloped countries (Levine et al., 1990; Thompson, 2000; Leclerc et
al., 2002; Dawson, 2005; Baldursson and Karanis, 2011; Budu-Amoako et al., 2011).
The reported prevalence of G. duodenalis assemblages A and B ranged from 20 - 100 %
in at least 14 countries including Italy, Wales, England, The Netherlands, USA, Canada,
Australia, China, Korea, Laos, India, Peru, Uganda and Turkey (Caccio et al., 2005).
Although, little epidemiological evidence exist that strongly supports the importance
of zoonotic transmission of giardiasis to humans, the occurrence of zoonotic
G. duodenalis assemblages A and B in sheep and goats suggest that these animals may
act as reservoirs for human infection (Xiao and Fayer, 2008).
1.5.2 Life cycle and morphology
The life cycle of Giardia is composed of two major stages: cysts and
trophozoites (Fig. 1-5). Cysts are environmentally stable and responsible for
transmission. Infection is initiated when the cyst is ingested with contaminated water
or, less commonly, food or through direct faecal-oral contact (Adam, 2001). Following
ingestion and exposure to the acidic environment of the stomach, cysts excyst and
develop into trophozoites in the proximal small intestine (Adam, 2001; Ankarklev et al.,
2010). The trophozoites then attach to the surface of the intestinal epithelium in the
crypts of the duodenum and upper jejunum and reproduce asexually by binary fusion,
causing intestinal tissue damage (characterised by diarrhoea and malabsorption)
(Ortega and Adam, 1997). After exposure to host specific-factors such as high levels of
bile, low levels of cholesterol and a basic pH, some trophozoites form cysts in the
jejunum and are passed in the faeces, allowing completion of the life cycle by infecting
a new host (Lauwaet et al., 2007).
Giardia cysts are either round or oval and measure 11 - 14 x 7 - 10 µm (Fig. 1-6)
(Ortega and Adam, 1997). Each cyst has four nuclei and contains axonemes and
median bodies (Ortega and Adam, 1997). The cysts are metabolically inactive and have
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
55
a hard wall (consisting of 60 % carbohydrate and 40 % protein) that protect them from
hypotonic lysis in the environment (Ankarklev et al., 2010).
Figure 1-5: Life cycle of Giardia duodenalis (Image from Ankarklev et al., 2010). Giardia cysts are exposed to gastric acid during their passage through the host’s stomach, triggering excystation. This causes differentiation of the cyst into the vegetative trophozoite, which attaches to the intestinal epithelium via its adhesive disc and replicates. After exposure to bile salts, some trophozoites form non-motile, infective cysts (a process known as encystation) in the lower intestine and are passed in the faeces.
Figure 1-6: Electron photomicrograph of Giardia duodenalis cysts (A) and trophozoites (B). (Bar = 10 µm) (Image from Ortega and Adam, 1997).
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
56
Giardia trophozoites measure 10 - 20 µm in length and 5 - 15 µm in width (Fig.
1-6) (Ortega and Adam, 1997). The shape of the trophozoites varies among species:
G. duodenalis is pear shaped and has one or two transverse, claw-shaped median
bodies; G. agilis is long and slender and has a teardrop-shaped median body, and
G. muris trophozoites are shorter and rounder and have a small, rounded median body
(Adam, 2001). Giardia duodenalis trophozoites are bilaterally symmetrical, measure
12 - 15 µm x 6 - 8 µm, and have a convex dorsal surface and a large unique adhesive or
‘sucking disc’ on the ventral surface (Thompson, 2004). They have two nuclei, four
pairs of flagellae and a pair of distinctive median bodies with a simple vesicular
secretory system, but no mitochondria or peroxisomes (Marti et al., 2003; Ankarklev et
al., 2010). The flagellae and adhesive disc are used for adhesion to the upper intestinal
walls, while the role of median body is unknown (Ankarklev et al., 2010).
1.5.3 Pathogenicity and clinical signs
The pathogenesis of Giardia is not clearly understood, however, several
mechanisms have been proposed based on studies on human epithelial cell lines, on
laboratory animals, goat kids and calves that indicate that pathogenesis of giardiasis is
a combination of both parasite and host factors (Ankarklev et al., 2010; Geurden et al.,
2010b). The main virulence factors include the trophozoite’s adhesive disc and the four
flagellae, which when they interact with host cells can induce apoptosis, loss of
epithelial-barrier function, diffuse shortening of microvillus (which leads to
malabsorption of electrolytes, solutes and water), mucosal inflammation (after
infiltration of lymphocytes and mast cells) and interference with bile salts metabolism
(Ankarklev et al., 2010).
The clinical signs of giardiasis include acute and chronic diarrhoea, dehydration,
abdominal pain and weight loss. Giardia duodenalis infections have been reported in
lambs in which abnormal faeces, impairment in feed efficiency, a decreased rate of
weight gain and severe weight loss have been observed (Olson et al., 1995); Aloisio et
al., 2006). In histological sections, mild to severe infiltrative enteritis with eosinophils,
lymphocytes and plasma cells have been reported (Aloisio et al., 2006). In humans,
symptoms include watery diarrhoea, epigastric pain, nausea, vomiting and weight loss,
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
57
which appear 6 - 15 days after the infection (Ankarklev et al., 2010). The clinical impact
is more severe in young children and undernourished or immunodeficient individuals.
1.5.4 Diagnosis
As the symptoms of giardiasis are similar to other gastrointestinal diseases,
clinical diagnosis in production animals is mainly based on clinical history, data on farm
management and the exclusion of other infectious disease, such as coccidiosis, and
confirmed by detection of the parasite in a faecal sample by microscopic examination,
antigen detection and PCR-based tools (Geurden et al., 2010b).
Traditional microscopic methods include the application of faecal concentration
techniques, especially, zinc sulphate flotation and centrifugation (Zajac et al., 2002)
and followed by stains such as iodine or trichrome (Geurden et al., 2010b). It is
cheaper to perform a microscopic examination but it has relatively low sensitivity and
requires a skilled and experienced person to discriminate the parasite (Xiao and Herd,
1993; Amar et al., 2002; Geurden et al., 2010b).
For detection of parasite antigen, immunofluorescence assays (IFAs) (Xiao and
Herd, 1993), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) (Boone et al., 1999) and
rapid solid-phase qualitative immunochromatography assays (Garcia et al., 2003) are
available. IFAs and ELISA use monoclonal antibodies against cyst wall proteins.
Immunochromatographic techniques also target cyst wall proteins as well as
trophozoite proteins and unlike, IFA and ELISA; they allow on-site and quick diagnosis
of infection (Garcia et al., 2003). Antigen detection tests are more sensitive and
specific than microscopic examination for diagnosis of infection, however, they too
require trained personnel and are expensive (Geurden et al., 2010b). These tests have
been developed and evaluated using human stool samples, and used in calves
(Geurden et al., 2004), however, they have not been used in sheep (Geurden et al.,
2010b).
Molecular tools are mainly used for differentiating Giardia at species and
genotype level for taxonomical and epidemiological research, but can be used for
diagnosis. Most studies have relied on the analysis of the well conserved eukaryotic
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
58
genes such as the 18S rRNA, glutamate dehydrogenase (gdh), triose phosphate
isomerase (tpi), elongation factor 1-alpha gene (ef-1α) or genes uniquely associated
with the parasite such as the β-giardin gene (Table 1-5) (Ryan and Caccio, 2013). Other
genes used for characterising Giardia include G. lamblia open reading frame (GLORF)-
C4 and the inter-genomic rRNA spacer region (IGS) (Caccio et al., 2005; Lee et al., 2006)
(Table 1-5).
Table 1-5: Molecular techniques for characterising Giardia(Adapted from Caccio et al. 2005). gdh = glutamate dehydrogenase, tpi = triose phosphate isomerase, EF-1α = elongation factor 1-alpha gene, GLORF-C4 = G.doudenalis open reading frame C4, IGS = inter-genomic rRNA spacer region.
Amplification target Assay type Main application
18S rDNA PCR, nested PCR, sequencing, microarray
Species and genotype identification
gdh PCR, nested PCR, sequencing, PCR-RFLP
Species and genotype identification
tpi PCR, nested PCR, sequencing, qPCR, microarray
Species and genotype identification
β-giardin PCR, nested PCR, sequencing, PCR-RFLP, q PCR, microarray
Genotype identification
EF-1α PCR, nested PCR, sequencing Species and genotype identification
GLORF-C4 PCR, sequencing, PCR-RFLP Genotype identification
IGS PCR, sequencing Genotype identification
1.5.5 Treatment and control
Several compounds, specifically, benzimidazoles and paromomycin, have a
known efficacy against Giardia both in vitro and in laboratory animals, yet there are no
drugs registered for the treatment of giardiasis in sheep and goats (Geurden et al.,
2010b). Several benzimidazole compounds and paromycin were shown to be
efficacious in experimental conditions, especially, in calves (O'Handley et al., 1997;
O'Handley et al., 2000; O'Handley et al., 2001; Geurden et al., 2006b; Geurden et al.,
2010a). Fenbendazole has been shown to effectively clear Giardia infection in natural
infections in lambs (Aloisio et al., 2006). In humans, nitroimidazoles and
benzimidazoles are used for treating giardiasis (Thompson, 2004).
To control Giardia infection in sheep and goats, a combined approach
consisting of chemotherapy and hygienic measures could be taken (Geurden et al.,
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
59
2006b). Preventive measures should include low stocking rate, isolation of infected
lambs from animal housing, regular cleaning and disinfection of the housing facilities
(Geurden et al., 2010b).
1.6 Anisakids
1.6.1 Distribution and taxonomy
Anisakid nematodes are economically significant in fish farming and are
medically important to humans. The presence of anisakid larvae on and in the viscera
and flesh or free in the body cavity of many economically important cephalopod and
fish species is an aesthetic problem, which leads to notable adverse effects on
marketing (Abollo et al., 2001). In addition, removing parasites adds appreciably to the
costs of packaging, reducing the value of the product and representing a financial loss
in marketing value (Abollo et al., 2001).
Anisakidosis refers to infection of people with larval stages of anisakid
nematodes belonging to the family Anisakidae or Rhaphidascarididae and its clinical
symptoms include acute abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and allergic responses (Chai
et al., 2005; Audicana and Kennedy, 2008). The first case of human infection by an
anisakid was reported in the Netherlands by Van Thiel (1960), who described the
presence of a marine nematode in a patient suffering from acute abdominal pain (Van
Thiel et al., 1960). Anisakidosis occurs throughout the world. Approximately 20, 000
cases of human anisakidosis are reported each year with majority of the cases (> 90)
from Japan, followed by Europe and then the rest of the world (the Americas, South-
east Asia, Egypt and New Zealand) (Lymbery and Cheah, 2007; Hochberg and Hamer,
2010).
Anisakids are ascarid nematodes, which utilise aquatic vertebrate (fish, reptiles,
piscivorous birds, or mammals) as definitive hosts and whose transmission depends on
water and usually involves aquatic invertebrates and fish as intermediate or paratenic
hosts (Lymbery and Cheah, 2007). The nematode superfamily Ascaridoidea contains >
50 genera. There are controversies in taxonomic classification in this superfamily; few
classification schemes exist due to inconsistencies in the key morphological structures
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
60
or life history features (Mattiucci et al., 2003; Mattiucci and Nascetti, 2008). Recent
reported phylogenetic relationships based on molecular data have not fully resolved
taxonomic uncertainty within this superfamily, however, they tend to support the
classification proposed by Fagerholm (1991) (Lymbery and Cheah, 2007). The two
genera most often associated with anisakidosis are Anisakis and Pseudoterranova.
The genus Anisakis consists of nine described species in two clades. The first
clade includes 6 species; Anisakis simplex complex (which comprised A. simplex sensu
stricto (s.s.), A. pegreffi and A. simplex C), A. typica and the sister species A. nascettii
and A. ziphidarum, while the second clade consists 3 species; A. brevispiculata,
A. paggiae and A. physeteris (Mattiucci and Nascetti, 2008; Mattiucci et al., 2009).
Currently, only A. simplex s.s., A. pegreffii and A. physeteris have been shown to cause
infection in humans (Asato et al., 1991; Hochberg and Hamer, 2010; Mattiucci et al.,
2011; Arizono et al., 2012). The distribution patterns of Anisakis species are likely to be
a consequence of dispersal through the faeces of infested oceanic delphinids (Kuhn et
al., 2011). Anisakis simplex s.s. is found in the northern hemisphere in Atlantic and
Pacific Oceans from 20 °N to 80 °N (the Artic polar circle) (Mattiucci and Nascetti,
2006; Kuhn et al., 2011). Anisakis pegreffi is distributed in southern oceans from
Mediterranean waters through to East Atlantic Ocean and down to the Antarctic
Peninsula and also in Japanese and Chinese waters (Mattiucci and Nascetti, 2006; Kuhn
et al., 2011). Anisakis physeteris is distributed throughout the central Atlantic Ocean
(Mattiucci and Nascetti, 2006; Kuhn et al., 2011). In the tropics and subtropics,
A. typica is the most dominant species between 45 °N and 25 °N (Mattiucci and
Nascetti, 2006; Kuhn et al., 2011). Anisakis typica is a common parasite of various
dolphin species of warmer temperate waters, such as Tucuxi (Sotalia fluviatilis), the
Common Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncates) and the Pantropical Spotted Dolphin
(Stenella attenuate) (Kuhn et al., 2011).
The genus Pseudoterranova consists of three species: Pseudoterranova kogiae,
P. cetiola and P. decipiens. To date, only P. decipiens (seal worms) have been reported
to cause infection in humans (Hochberg and Hamer, 2010). Based on genetic analysis,
P. decipiens represents a species complex comprising 6 different species, namely,
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
61
P. azarasi, P. bulbosa, P. cattani, P. decipiens sensu stricto (s.s.), P. decipiens E and
P. krabbei (Mattiucci and Nascetti, 2008). Pseudoterranova decipiens s.s. has a wider
distribution including the North East Atlantic (NEA), the North West Atlantic (NWA),
arctic and sub-arctic areas (Mattiucci and Nascetti, 2008). The main geographic
distribution of P. krabbei is NEA, P. bulbosa is NWA and North West Pacific (NWP),
P. azarasi is NWP and waters of Japan, P. decipiens E is Antartica and P. cattani is
South-East Pacific (Mattiucci and Nascetti, 2008).
1.6.2 Life cycle and morphology
Anisakid nematodes have a complex life cycle involving a free-living stage and
multiple host species (Fig. 1-7). The definitive hosts for Anisakis species are cetaceans
(dolphins, porpoises and whales) and for Pseudoterranova are pinnipeds (seals,
walruses, and sea lions) (Hochberg and Hamer, 2010). Adult nematodes living in the
gut of marine mammals produce unembryonated eggs, which are shed with the faeces
of their hosts. The egg embryonate in the sea and develops into first stage larva (L1)
and then free- living L2 or L3 larvae (Lymbery and Cheah, 2007; Hochberg and Hamer,
2010). Free-living larvae are ingested by small crustaceans (e.g. krills, first intermediate
host), in which L2 can develop into L3 for some anisakid nematodes (Lymbery and
Cheah, 2007; Hochberg and Hamer, 2010). Infected crustaceans are eaten by fish and
squid (second intermediate hosts), in which the L3 migrates into the viscera and
peritoneal cavity (Hochberg and Hamer, 2010). L3 larvae are often transferred from
fish to fish along the food chain, as a result, large numbers of larvae may accumulate in
piscivorous fish (Hochberg and Hamer, 2010). Upon ingestion by a definitive host, L3
develop into L4 then adult. Humans can only be considered accidental hosts in this life
cycle, and have no influence on the transmission of these parasites (since L3 larvae do
not develop any further and the cycle cannot be completed).
Like other nematodes, anisakid are cylindrical (or round in cross section) and
non-segmented. They have both an oral and anal opening and a complete digestive
tract, which includes an oesophagus, a ventriculus and an intestine (Berland, 1961). In
addition, the mouth of third stage larvae of Anisakis is surrounded by three relatively
small, inconspicuous lips with a prominent boring tooth, an excretory pore and a
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
62
mucron (Cannon, 1977). Anisakis larvae are white, usually coil in a characteristic
watch-spring shape and can grow up to 40 mm in length and 0.6 mm in width (Cannon,
1977; Hurst, 1984).
Figure 1-7: Complex life cycle of anisakid nematodes. Image from CDC, (http://www.cdc.gov/parasites/anisakiasis/biology.html), retrieved 30th October 2013. Adult nematodes living in the stomach of marine mammals produce unembryonated eggs, which are shed by their hosts (1). Eggs become embryonated, hatched and develop into free-living third stage larvae (L3) (2a, b). The free-living L3 are ingested by planktonic crustaceans (e.g. euphausiid oceanic krill and copepods) (intermediate/paratenic hosts) (3). Infected crustaceans are eaten by fish and cephalods (e.g. squid) and through predation the larvae are transferred from fish to fish (4, 5). When fish or squid containing L3 larvae are ingested by marine mammals, the larvae molt twice and develop into adult worms (6). Adult worms produce eggs to continue the life cycle. Humans become infected through eating L3-infected raw or undercooked fish or cephalods. Humans act as accidental hosts, since L3 usually do not develop any further and the cycle cannot be completed (7).
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
63
The L3 larvae of Pseudoterranova spp. have three well-defined lips, a boring
tooth, an excretory pore ventral between ventral lips, no ventricular appendages, a
well-developed intestinal caecum and a bluntly rounded tail with little mucron (Hurst,
1984). They are dark red in colour and measure 25 - 36 mm in length and up to 1.2 mm
in width (Hurst, 1984).
1.6.3 Pathogenicity and clinical signs
Anisakid larvae found inside the fish are usually tightly coiled and found on the
mesenteries, liver, and gonads and in the musculature of the body wall of infected fish.
Studies have demonstrated that the presence of larvae in fish induces various
pathophysiological changes including host cell necrosis in liver and muscle, reduced
cell size, organ compression, gastrointestinal eosinophilic granulomas, proliferation of
host cellular immune responses during hours of invasion and chronic inflammatory
responses near the site of infected liver and muscles (Hauck and May, 1977; Elarifi,
1982; Heckmann, 1985).
In marine mammals, anisakids cause gastric lesions, ulceration, connective
tissue proliferation, granulation, peritonitis and erode the gastric lining, which results
in auto digestion of the stomach wall by the host (Spraker et al., 2003).
Human anisakidosis can take several forms depending on the location and
histopathological lesions caused by the larva. In non-invasive infections, larvae remain
in the alimentary canal without penetrating the mucosa wall and are only discovered
when the worms are expelled by coughing, vomiting or defecating (Lymbery and
Cheah, 2007). This form of infection is usually asymptomatic but occasionally produces
a “tingling throat” syndrome when worms migrate back up the oesophagus into the
oropharynx (Sakanari and McKerrow, 1989). Non-invasive infections are often due to
Pseudoterranova sp. (Lymbery and Cheah, 2007).
In the invasive form of anisakidosis, larvae penetrate the alimentary tract and
associated organs in infected people. Penetration of the buccal mucosa and
pharyngeal mucosa occurs only rarely, by the larvae of both Anisakis and
Pseudoterranova (Amin et al., 2000; Lymbery and Cheah, 2007). Symptoms of
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
64
oropharyngeal anisakidosis include slight pain, feelings of discomfort, and difficulty in
swallowing (Amin et al., 2000). Penetration of the gastric or intestinal mucosa is the
most common form of anisakidosis. It is associated with four major clinical signs
including gastric anisakidosis, intestinal anisakidosis, ectopic (or extra-gastrointestinal)
anisakidosis, and allergic diseases in infected people. Infections with Anisakis can
result in both gastric and intestinal anisakidosis, while Pseudoterranova causes gastric
invasions (Bouree et al., 1995). The symptoms of gastric anisakidosis occur 1 - 12 h
after ingestion of infected fish and is associated with severe epigastric pain, nausea,
vomiting, low grade fever and occasionally, a rash (Lymbery and Cheah, 2007;
Hochberg and Hamer, 2010). Blood is often observed in gastric juices and stool
(Sakanari and McKerrow, 1989). Acute gastric anisakidosis is often misdiagnosed and
can become a chronic disease with clinical features, which are similar to peptic ulcers,
gastric tumours, acute gastritis, and cholecystitis (Lymbery and Cheah, 2007). Intestinal
anisakiasis usually manifests as an acute disease, occurring 5 - 7 days after ingestion of
the anisakid larvae and is characterised by intermittent or constant abdominal pain,
nausea, vomiting, fever, diarrhoea with blood (Lymbery and Cheah, 2007; Hochberg
and Hamer, 2010). Ectopic (extra-alimentary) anisakidosis is less common and results
from larval penetration of the gastrointestinal tract and migration in the body cavity
where they usually lodge in the peritoneum or subcutaneous tissues, forming tumour-
like, eosinophilic granulomas or abscesses (Lymbery and Cheah, 2007; Hochberg and
Hamer, 2010). Associated symptoms include abdominal pain, vomiting and bloody
stools (Lymbery and Cheah, 2007). Anisakidosis is often associated with strong allergic
responses, with clinical symptoms ranging from isolated swellings to urticarial and life-
threatening anaphylactic shock (Audicana and Kennedy, 2008; Alonso et al., 1999;
Hochberg and Hamer, 2010).
1.6.4 Diagnosis
As symptoms (acute epigastric or abdominal pain) of gastrointestinal
anisakidosis are nonspecific, clinical diagnosis requires careful examination of clinical
symptoms and patient history of recent consumption of raw or incompletely cooked
fish. Gastric anisakidosis is often misdiagnosed as peptic ulcer or stomach tumour,
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
65
while intestinal anisakidosis as appendicitis or peritonitis (Sakanari and McKerrow,
1989). Diagnosis of gastric anisakidosis includes endoscopy, which allows larvae to be
removed and identified morphologically or genetically, and radiology, which can detect
morphological changes in the host, such as thickened, narrowed and obstructed areas
(Hochberg and Hamer, 2010). Intestinal anisakidosis is more complicated to diagnose
and differential diagnosis is recommended (Hochberg and Hamer, 2010).
Worms isolated from fish samples can be identified on the basis of gross
morphological features, which may be observed microscopically in live or preserved
specimens. For examination, the use of clearing agents such as xylene may be
necessary to make the nematode cuticle more transparent and a slide mount can be
prepared. The morphological characters are used to distinguish adult worms include:
(i) structures of labiae and ventriculus, (ii) the shape of a tail, (iii) the shape of lobes
(Berland, 1961; Cannon, 1977; Olson et al., 1983).
Molecular tools such as PCR, PCR-based RFLP and single-strand conformation
polymorphism are widely used for characterisation of anisakid species. The two most
common targets are the rDNA ITS regions (Zhu et al., 1998; D'Amelio et al., 2000;
Nadler et al., 2000; Pontes et al., 2005; Abe et al., 2006; Umehara et al., 2006; Zhu et
al., 2007; Umehara et al., 2008; Kijewska et al., 2009b;) and the mt-DNA cytochrome
oxidase subunit II (cox2) gene (Valentini et al., 2006; Mattiucci et al., 2009; Cavallero et
al., 2011; D'Amelio et al., 2011; Murphy et al., 2010; Setyobudi et al., 2011). The rDNA
ITS region is a more conserved target and provides a useful approach for the
identification of both distantly and closely related ascaroid species as these spacers
show interspecific sequence differences in the presence of low-level intraspecific
variation (Zhu et al., 1998). On the other hand, mitochondrial DNA evolve at a faster
rate than the rDNA ITS and therefore, provide useful information for phylogenetic
reconstruction of closely related species of nematodes or for identification of cryptic
species (Blouin, 1998, 2002).
1.6.5 Treatment and control
Anisakis and Pseudoterranova cannot survive in humans and will eventually die
(Nakaji, 2009). Endoscopic treatment is the definitive treatment for gastric anisakidosis
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
66
(Hochberg and Hamer, 2010). Endoscopy allows the physician to remove the larva with
the biopsy forceps and identify the worm morphologically. Early removal of worm may
prevent the formation of eosinophilic granulomas caused by allergic reaction to the
degenerating worm in chronic infections (Sakanari and McKerrow, 1989). For intestinal
anisakiasis, recommended treatments include anthelmintics, isotonic glucose solutions
and removal of tissue by surgery (Moschella et al., 2005, Pacios et al., 2005). Control
measures for anisakidosis should focus on postharvest handling, storage and cooking
procedures for fish (Lymbery and Cheah, 2007) and educating the public about the
dangers of eating raw or inadequately cooked, marinated, or salted marine fish or
squid (Hochberg and Hamer, 2010).
1.7 Chlamydia
1.7.1 Distribution and taxonomy
Members of the genus Chlamydia are gram-negative obligate intracellular
bacteria, which are distributed globally and cause a variety of diseases including
pneumonia, gastroenteritis, encephalomyelitis, conjunctivitis, arthritis, sexually
transmitted diseases and abortion in man, other mammals and birds (Longbottom and
Coulter, 2003). The first descriptions of chlamydial organisms were provided by
Halberstaedter and von Prowazek in 1907, who described the transmission of
trachoma from man to orangutans by inoculating their eyes with conjunctival scrapings
(Halberstädter and von Prowazek, 1907a, b). It was thought that those organisms were
protozoa and they were named ‘chlamydozoa’ after the Greek word ‘chlamys’ for
mantle, because the reddish elementary bodies of the bacterium appeared to be
embedded in a blue matrix or mantle (Longbottom and Coulter, 2003). Chlamydial
infections in domestic mammals was first reported in 1936 following abortions in
sheep in Scotland (Grieg, 1936). The aetiological agent was identified in 1950 by Stamp
et al., and subsequently, the disease was termed enzootic abortion of ewes (EAE,
synonym, ovine enzootic abortion or OEA) (Stamp et al., 1950; Stamp et al., 1952).
The taxonomy of Chlamydiaceae has recently undergone several
reclassifications based on sequence analysis of the 16S and 23S ribosomal RNA and
was divided into two genera, Chlamydia and Chlamydophila (Everett et al., 1999).
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
67
However, the use of the two-genus classification system, while initially helpful in
distinguishing animal species in the genus Chlamydia, has not been widely adopted
and indeed caused considerable confusion. Efforts are underway to confirm the
"reunification" of the genus Chlamydia and in 2010, the subcommittee on the
taxonomy of the Chlamydiae proposed the return to the combined genus Chlamydia
(Greub, 2010). There are nine species in the genus Chlamydia; Chlamydia trachomatis,
C. muridarum, C. suis, C. pecorum, C. abortus (formerly known as Chlamydia psittaci
serotype 1), C. pneumonia, C. psittaci, C. caviae and C. felis (Everett et al., 1999). Of
these, two species, C. abortus and C. pecorum, infect sheep and goats (Berri et al.,
2009; Rodolakis and Yousef Mohamad, 2010; Lenzko et al., 2011;). Both C. abortus and
C. pecorum are known to cause abortion in small ruminants with C. pecorum also
known to cause enteric diseases in these animals (Berri et al., 2009; Rodolakis and
Yousef Mohamad, 2010).
Chlamydia abortus, in particular, efficiently colonizes the placenta, leading to
abortion or premature births in sheep and goats and financial losses in the affected
flocks (Longbottom and Coulter, 2003). It is a most common cause of reproductive loss
in sheep and goats worldwide due to abortion, especially, in Northern Europe (Stuen
and Longbottom, 2011). In the United Kingdom, OEA is responsible for approximately
45 % of all diagnosed infectious cause of abortion (Stuen and Longbottom, 2011).
Globally, the prevalence (mostly seroprevalence) of C. abortus in sheep and goats can
vary drastically from < 5 % to > 50 % (Wang et al., 2001; Borel et al., 2004; Szeredi et
al., 2006; Bagdonas et al., 2007; Cislakova et al., 2007; Masala et al., 2007; Czopowicz
et al., 2010; Pinheiro Junior et al., 2010; Lenzko et al., 2011; Runge et al., 2012).
In addition to its effect on sheep and goat production, C. abortus is hazardous
for pregnant women due to its zoonotic potential (Rodolakis and Yousef Mohamad,
2010). Zoonotic abortion due to C. abortus infection has been confirmed by genetic
analysis of isolates from a woman who worked with sheep (Herring et al., 1987).
Confirmed cases of abortions in people have also been reported in several countries
including France (Villemonteix et al., 1990), the US (Jorgensen, 1997), the Netherlands
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
68
(Kampinga et al., 2000), Switzerland (Pospischil et al., 2002) and Italy (Walder et al.,
2005).
Chlamydia pecorum was first associated with disease (sporadic bovine
encephalomyelitis) in cattle in 1940 (McNutt, 1940). The name Chlamydia pecorum
was given by Fukushi and Hirai in 1992 on the basis of genetic data when they isolated
the organism from diseased cattle and sheep with clinical signs including sporadic
encephalitis, infectious polyarthritis, pneumonia and diarrhoea (Fukushi and Hirai,
1992). Chlamydia pecorum infects a wide range of mammals including sheep, goats,
cattle, pigs and koalas and causes a wide range of diseases such as enteritis,
polyarthritis, conjunctivitis, pneumonia, encephalomyelitis, metritis, salpingitis,
mastitis and infertility (Mohamad and Rodolakis, 2010). Its involvement in small
ruminant abortion cases have been reported in France and in North African countries
(Rodolakis and Souriau, 1989; Berri et al., 2009). Several studies have reported the
prevalence of C. pecorum; in Germany, it was 47 % in sheep (Lenzko et al., 2011), while
in Egypt, it was 6.7 % in sheep and 50 % in goats (Osman et al., 2011). The zoonotic
potential of C. pecorum is unknown (Longbottom and Coulter, 2003; Robertson et al.,
2010).
1.7.2 Life cycle and morphology
Species of Chlamydia have a unique life cycle, with alteration between two
morphological forms, an elementary body (EB) and a reticulate body (RB) (Fig. 1-8)
(Longbottom and Coulter, 2003). The EBs are small (approximately, 0.3 µm in
diameter), round, electron dense, non-replicating, extracellular infectious forms of the
organism (Matsumoto, 1973; Eb et al., 1976). The RBs are larger (0.5 - 1.6 µm in
diameter) and their cytoplasm appears granular with diffuse, fibrillar nucleic acids
(Plaunt and Hatch, 1988). RBs are non-infectious and they are bounded by an inner
and outer-membrane resembling other gram-negative bacteria. Their surfaces are
covered with projections and rosettes that extend from the bacterial surface through
the inclusion membrane, similar to those on EBs but at a higher density (Matsumoto,
1982; Abdelrahman and Belland, 2005).
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
69
Figure 1-8: Chlamydial development cycle (Adapted from Longbottom and Coulter, 2003). In pregnant animals, elementary bodies (EBs) enter the placental cells by endocytosis, inside a vacuole or inclusion body, which is formed out of the placental cell wall. EBs transformed into metabolically active reticulate bodies (RBs) that replicate by binary fission inside the inclusion body. When the inclusion body occupies most of the cell volume, the RBs transformed back to EBs, which are then released upon cell lysis and infect other cells.
The life cycle is initiated with the endocytosis of EBs by eukaryotic cells. On
entering the host cell, RBs develop from EBs via numerous morphologically
intermediate stages so that by 8 - 12 h after infection, almost pure RB populations are
seen (Moulder, 1991). The mature RBs undergo multiplication by binary fission. The
phagocytic membrane surrounding the ingested EB becomes the inclusion membrane,
which now encloses the micrology of dividing RBS (Moulder, 1991). After division (12 -
24 h depending on the species), RBs revert back to metabolically inactive, infectious
EBs, which are released by the cell through exocytosis (Longbottom and Coulter, 2003).
Species of Chlamydia are shed in faeces, urine, respiratory secretions, birth
fluids or placentas of infected animals (Rodolakis and Yousef Mohamad, 2010).
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
70
Transmission of C. abortus in ruminants can occur from ingestion of placenta or grass
contaminated by vaginal discharge and placenta (Rodolakis and Yousef Mohamad,
2010). The transmission of C. abortus to people generally occurs via inhalation of
infectious dust and aerosols inducing infection of the mucosal epithelial cells and
macrophages of the respiratory tract and eventually spread through blood stream to
various organs (Rodolakis and Yousef Mohamad, 2010).
1.7.3 Pathogenicity and clinical signs
Chlamydial abortions in small ruminants are primarily caused by C. abortus and
sometimes by C. pecorum, in combination with other co-factors such as nutrition,
parasites or animal breed (Mohamad and Rodolakis, 2010). After C. abortus infects its
host, it enters a latent phase where it causes no clinical signs and is undetectable
(Jones, 1995). The animal host produces cytokines in response to chlamydial infection,
specifically, interferon-gamma, which restricts the growth of the bacteria in host cells
in a dose dependant manner (Entrican et al., 2001). During latency, it is thought that
bacteria reside in the tonsils, from which they are spread by blood or lymph to other
lymphoid tissues (Jones and Anderson, 1988). During pregnancy, it is thought that
immune modulation releases the organisms from latency, allowing them to multiply,
which in turn initiates placental infection (Longbottom and Coulter, 2003). Placental
infection occurs at around day 60 of gestation, although pathological changes are not
seen until after day 90 of gestation (Buxton et al., 1990). The chlamydial invasion of
the placentome leads to aggressive inflammatory response, thrombotic vasculitis and
necrotic damage to the cotyledons and intercotyledonary membranes of the
placentome (Buxton et al., 1990; Longbottom and Coulter, 2003). Pathological changes
in the foetus consist of focal necrosis of the liver, lung, spleen and less frequently,
brain and lymph nodes (Buxton et al., 1990). The destruction of chorionic epithelium,
associated lesions and impairment to the placentome are enough to compromise the
maternal-foetal exchange of oxygen and nutrients, leading to foetal death
(Longbottom and Coulter, 2003). In addition, placental chlamydial infection induces
significant changes in hormone concentration, which can also contribute to premature
labour (Longbottom and Coulter, 2003). The abortion of the foetus occurs around 2 - 3
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
71
weeks prior to the expected term (Longbottom and Coulter, 2003). Following abortion,
the aborting females develop protective immunity that prevents them from aborting
due to chlamydial organism in subsequent pregnancies (Kerr et al., 2005).
Clinical signs associated with C. abortus infection in ewes and does include
abortion, stillbirth and retained placenta, which may lead to metritis (Rodolakis and
Yousef Mohamad, 2010). Infected ewes and does show no clinical signs prior to
abortion, although vaginal discharge is sometimes observed (Rodolakis and Yousef
Mohamad, 2010). Lambs and kids born live from infected females may have arthritis,
conjunctivitis and pneumonia (Rodolakis and Yousef Mohamad, 2010). In male
animals, C. abortus can reach the seminal vesicles and cause epididymitis, while in
non-pregnant female animals, infections generally develop into an asymptomatic form
(Waldhalm et al., 1971). In people, clinical signs of C. abortus infection include malaise,
influenza-like illness, mild dry cough and dyspnoea (Rodolakis and Yousef Mohamad,
2010). Pregnant women may experience lower abdominal pain, followed by abortion
and sometimes severe complications such as acute renal failure, disseminated
intravascular coagulation, or respiratory distress, necessitating mechanical ventilation
(Rodolakis and Yousef Mohamad, 2010).
Chlamydia pecorum is commonly found in the digestive tract of healthy
ruminants (Clarkson and Philips, 1997), however, some have been isolated from ovine
and caprine abortion cases in Morocco, Egypt and France (Rekiki et al., 2004; Osman et
al., 2011). The common clinical signs of C. pecorum are diarrhoea, conjunctivitis,
arthritis, encephalitis, orchitis, and pneumonia in small ruminants (Fukushi and Hirai,
1992; Berri et al., 2009; Mohamad and Rodolakis, 2010). Also, C. pecorum can be
spread from the intestines through blood circulation, as a result of unknown physio-
pathological changes, and may reach the placenta, where they induce abortion
(Osman et al., 2011).
1.7.4 Diagnosis
There are two main approaches for diagnosing Chlamydia species in mammals:
(i) by identification of the agent using smears, antigen detection, DNA, tissue sections
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
72
and isolation of the agent by cell culture, and (ii) by serological tests such as
complement fixation test and ELISA. The choice of the test depends on the type of
sample received (blood, placental membranes, foetal tissues, swabs), organism
viability, presumptive diagnosis and clinical history (Sachse et al., 2009). A presumptive
diagnosis of infection can be made if the abortion occurs in the last 2 to 3 weeks of
gestation and by the presence of gross pathology of both the intercotyledonary
membranes and the cotyledons upon examination of fresh placenta (Stuen and
Longbottom, 2011). This can be confirmed by microscopic examination of smears
made from infected cotyledons prepared using a modified Ziehl-Neelsen, Giemsa,
Gimenez, or Machiavello procedure (Longbottom and Coulter, 2003; Sachse et al.,
2009). Smears can also be made from vaginal swabs of females, which have aborted
within the previous 24 h, or from the moist fleece of a freshly aborted or stillborn lamb
(Longbottom and Coulter, 2003). Chlamydia abortus and rickettsia (Coxiella burnettii)
have similar morphology and staining characteristics and therefore, further tests such
as fluorescent antibody tests using a specific antiserum or monoclonal antibody are
useful for identification of C. abortus in smears (Longbottom and Coulter, 2003).
Antigen detection methods also include immunohistochemical staining of tissue
sections using specific monoclonal antibodies against dominant chlamydial surface
antigens (Stuen and Longbottom, 2011).
Serological tests based on complement fixation tests (CFT) may be used to
detect a rise in antibody titre to C. abortus after abortion or stillbirth (Longbottom and
Coulter, 2003). For this, paired blood samples taken at the time of abortion and then at
least 3 weeks later is used for detection. However, because C. abortus shares common
antigens with C. pecorum and some Gram-negative bacteria, detection using CFT can
be problematic due to antigenic cross-reactivity (Longbottom and Coulter, 2003).
DNA-based techniques provide an alternative approach for verifying the
presence of chlamydial organism. Over recent years, a variety of molecular tools
including conventional PCR, qPCRs and DNA microarray technology, have been
developed and used for specific detection of chlamydial organisms (Sachse et al.,
2009). qPCR assays have been the preferred method in diagnostic laboratories because
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
73
of their rapidity, high throughput and ease of standardisation (Sachse et al., 2009). The
targets of these tools include 16S rRNA, 16-23S intergenic spacer region, 23S rRNA,
and the outer membrane protein gene (ompA) (Sachse et al., 2009).
1.7.5 Treatment and control
Chlamydiosis is usually treated with tetracyline. If ovine enzootic abortion is
suspected to be present in a flock of pregnant ewes, long-acting oxytetracycline (20
mg/kg body weight, intramuscularly) may be given to reduce severity of infection and
losses resulting from abortion (Longbottom and Coulter, 2003; Stuen and Longbottom,
2011). Treatment should be given soon after day 95 - 100 of gestation, when
pathological changes start to occur in the placenta, with subsequent treatment given
at 2 week intervals until the time of lambing (Longbottom and Coulter, 2003; Stuen
and Longbottom, 2011). Tetracyline does not effectively eliminate the infection nor
reverse any pathological damage in the animals, but reduces the disease in the flock
(Longbottom and Coulter, 2003).
In people with chlamydial infections, treatment includes supportive therapy
(fluids, oxygen), measures to combat toxic shock and administration of tetracylines,
erythromycin and clarithromycin (orally or parenterally) depending on clinical severity
(Stuen and Longbottom, 2011).
For control, good hygiene such as hand washing is essential before tending to
other animals. Chlamydia is shed in faeces, urine, respiratory secretions, birth fluids,
and placentas of infected symptomatic and asymptomatic animals and as EBs do not
survive very long, they require close contact for transmission (Rodolakis and Yousef
Mohamad, 2010). After abortion, the infected ewes or does should be immediately
isolated, all dead newborns, placentals and bedding safely disposed of and lambing
pens cleaned and disinfected to limit the risk of spreading contamination (Longbottom
and Coulter, 2003). Pregnant women should avoid contact with pregnant or aborting
ruminants and, if possible, sheep or goats if OEA is suspected in a flock.
Chapter 1 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
74
1.8 Aims of the present study
Given the lack of knowledge of parasitic infections in sheep, goats and fish in
PNG, the main objectives of this thesis were to:
(i) Investigate the prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in faecal samples from
sheep and goats by light microscopy;
(ii) Detect Haemonchus contortus, Teladorsagia circumcincta, and Trichostrongylus
spp. in faecal samples of sheep and goats using molecular tools;
(iii) Detect Eimeria spp. in faecal samples of sheep and goats using molecular tools;
(iv) Investigate the prevalence and perform molecular characterisation of
Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. in sheep, goats and fish;
(v) Investigate the prevalence and characterise the species of anisakid nematodes in
fish using morphological and molecular tools; and
(vi) Investigate the prevalence of Chlamydia abortus and C. pecorum in faecal
samples of sheep and goats using molecular tools.
Chapter 2
2. Materials and Methods
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
2.1 General background of the study The samples for the present study were collected in various locations in PNG
(Fig. 2-1). Most of the laboratory components of this study were conducted at
Murdoch University, but some analyses were carried out at Divine Word University
(DWU) in Madang, PNG and at the University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Specifically, coprological analyses of faecal samples from sheep and goats were
performed at DWU in April 2011 and scanning electron microcopy of anisakid larvae
was conducted at the Centre for Microscopy Characterisation and Analysis (CMCA) at
the University of Western Australia in May 2012. Light microscopy analysis of anisakid
larvae and histological analysis of fish tissues were conducted at the School of
Veterinary and Life Sciences at Murdoch University. All molecular work was conducted
in the State Agriculture and Biotechnology Centre (SABC) laboratory at Murdoch
University between September 2011 and October 2013.
2.2 Human and animal ethics approval
A questionnaire survey for sheep and goat farmers was approved by Murdoch
University Human Research Ethics committee (Permit/Project no: 2010/174). Faecal
sample collection from sheep and goats and collection of fish was approved by
Murdoch University Animal Ethics Committee (Permit no: R2368/10).
2.3 Sampling
2.3.1 Study locations for sheep and goats
PNG has extremely variable agro-ecological conditions, although, it is located in
the tropics. It has at least three broad climatic zones, namely, wet lowland (< 1, 200
m), dry lowland (< 1, 200 m) and moderately wet highland (> 1, 200 m) areas
(Quartermain, 2004b). The wet lowland areas receive from 2, 000 - 5, 000 mm of
rainfall annually, while dry lowland areas receive less than 2, 000 mm of rainfall and
are characterized by pronounced dry periods of up to six months of the year
(Quartermain, 2004b). The highland areas exhibit temperate climate with occasional
frosts above 1, 800 m and rainfall between 2, 000 and 2, 300 mm with high seasonality
(Quartermain, 2004b).
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
77
The study locations for sheep and goats were chosen because they represented
the largest flocks in the country (Fig. 2-1). As there was no available demographic
information on the small ruminant farms, the farms were chosen based upon
consultation with agricultural scientists at the National Agricultural Research Institute
(NARI).
Figure 2-1: Study locations for sheep, goats and fish in the present study. The dots on the map represent sites where sheep and goats were collected. Research institutional farms were in Labu (insert 1) and Tambul (insert 6). The public institutional farm was in Baisu (insert 6). The government farm was in Menifo (insert 5). Smallholder farms were in Chuave (insert 4); Daulo, Goroka, Benabena and Korefeigu (insert 5). The stars represent sites where fish were collected. Cultured freshwater fish were obtained from ponds in Bathem (insert 2), Kundiawa (insert 4), Asaro (insert 5) and Mumeng (insert 1). Wild freshwater fish were collected in Ramu River near Sausi (insert 3) and Sepik River near Pagwi (insert 2). Wild marine fish were collected in Bilbil and Madang (insert 3), and Pilapila and Tavana (insert 7).
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
78
The chosen study locations were located in two broad agro-climatic regions:
the warm and wet lowland area. Specific study site is Labu in Morobe Province.
the cool and moderately wet highlands region. Specific study sites are
Korefeigu, Benabena, Menifo, Goroka and Daulo in Eastern Highlands Province
(EHP); Chuave in Simbu Province; and Baisu and Tambul in Western Highlands
Province (WHP).
The study locations were divided into 5 groups based on the farm management
systems (Table 2-1). These include:
(i) Lowland research institutional farm (Labu),
(ii) Highland research institutional farm (Tambul),
(iii) Public institutional farm (Baisu),
(iv) Government station farm (Menifo),
(v) Smallholder farms (Benabena, Korefeigu, Goroka, Daulo and Chuave).
Table 2-1: Sampling locations and farm information for the chosen sheep and goat flocks in the present study. The combined numbers of sheep and goats at the time of sampling in Labu, Baisu, Tambul and Menifo were 125, 70, 143 and 55, respectively. Smallholder farmers kept 3 - 19 animals per herd. The asterisk (*) refers to flocks that graze free range over a wide area near road-sides, gardens, hills etc. References for climate data: Quartermain, 2004b and Bourke, 2010. S = sheep, G = goats, O = others (such as pigs, dogs, chickens, or cattle).
Study locations
Mean altitude (m)
Mean annual temperature (°C)
Mean annual rainfall (mm)
Farm ownership
Farm size (ha)
Animals on property
Labu 0 26 > 4000 Research 20 - 60 S, G, O
Tambul 2320 13.8 3000 Research 20 - 60 S, G
Menifo 1608 20.1 1000 - 1500 Government 20 - 60 S, G, O
Baisu 1730 18.3 3000 Public 20 - 60 S, G
Chuave 1530 20.4 2000 Smallholder Varies* G, O
Daulo 2000 20.1 2000 Smallholder Varies* S, G, O
Goroka 1600 20.1 1500 Smallholder Varies* S, G, O
Korefeigu 1600 20.1 1500 Smallholder Varies* S, G, O
Benabena 1600 20.1 1500 Smallholder Varies* S, G, O
2.3.2 Study locations for fish
Fish were collected from four cultured freshwater ponds, two large river
systems and marine environments in various locations throughout PNG (Fig. 2-1). Both
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
79
of the river systems are widely used by people for transportation and for sourcing fish.
For marine fish, waters near the township of Madang (Madang province) and Rabaul
(East New Britain province) were chosen, as they are centrally located and relatively
easily accessible.
Specifically, these locations included:
Mumeng in Morobe Province - a cultured freshwater pond and hatchery that
actively distributes fingerlings to local customers,
Kundiawa in Simbu Province - a cultured freshwater fish-pond, which was built
in the centre of the town,
Asaro in EHP - a cultured freshwater fish-pond, which was set up in a forested
area just outside the village,
Betham in East Sepik Province - a cultured freshwater fish-pond, which was
built in the grassland area near the village,
Sepik River near Pagwi in East Sepik Province for wild freshwater fish,
Ramu River near Sausi in Madang Province for wild freshwater fish,
Madang-coastal areas near Madang town, Madang Province for wild marine
fish,
Bilbil, Madang Province for wild marine fish,
Pilapila, East New Britain (ENB) Province in for wild marine fish, and
Tavana, ENB Province for wild marine fish.
2.4 Survey questionnaire
The sheep and goat owners/managers completed questionnaires regarding
farm management and animal health programs for their flocks (sample questionnaire
form is attached in Appendix A).
Farm management
The flocks from the three institutional farms (Labu, Baisu and Tambul) and the
government farm (Menifo) grazed pasture in fenced areas (20 - 60 ha) at daytime. At
night-time, the flocks were kept in houses with wooden, slatted floors in institutional
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
80
farms and on the ground in the government farm. At the time of sample collection, the
combined numbers of sheep and goats in Labu, Tambul, Baisu and Menifo were 125,
143, 70 and 55, respectively. The subsistence farmers kept few animals, usually less
than 20, which grazed free range or were tethered and housed at night on slatted
floors or on the ground underneath the farmer’s house (Fig. 2-2).
Feeding system
Most animals grazed on native grasses and shrubs. Smallholder farmers also
fed their animals with starchy vegetables, mostly sweet potatoes. The interviewed
farmers also indicated that there were feed shortages due to shortage of pasture for
grazing, fires or drought. The animals drank from troughs, sourced from main water
supplies or rainwater tanks, rainwater run-off or ponds.
Herd health programs
Hygiene and management levels for animal housing were sub-optimal. For
example, the floors of the houses where animals were kept at night-time were
unclean. The animals were penned on dirty floors, bare ground or on bare concrete
floors. The smallholder farmers did not shear their sheep as they did not have the
resources for it. Most farm managers reported that the most common signs of illness
in their animals were diarrhoea and coughing, followed by itching and hair loss. Most
smallholder farmers did not know about causes of diseases in their sheep and goats or
know about or use anthelmintic drugs for controlling gastrointestinal parasite
infections. For instance, a farmer in Benabena reported the death of his entire flock of
sheep (n = 25) and noticed nematode worms in the gut of a dead sheep. The three
large institutional flocks were drenched with benzimidazole (Panacur) nominally at
bimonthly intervals. At the time of sampling animals had been drenched two months
previously in Labu, four months previously in Baisu and Tambul and six months
previously in Menifo.
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
81
Figure 2-2: Pictures of sheep and goat farming in PNG. A. Staffs of National Agriculture Research Institute (NARI) in Tambul. B. Lambing pens at NARI, Tambul. C. Sheep tethered and housed under the owner’s house in Goroka. D. A subsistence farmer tethering her goats in Daulo. E. A wooden slatted floored night house for sheep and goats in Korefeigu. F. Sheep and goats housed together in a smallholder farm in Benabena.
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
82
Farm types
The flocks at Labu and Tambul are managed by the NARI. Both had relatively
high numbers of animals (Labu = 125, Tambul = 143). Labu is in Morobe Province,
which is located in a humid lowland area with very high rainfall. The flocks in Labu are
made up of PNG Priangan sheep and PNG goat genotype, which possibly came from
the PNG University of Technology in Lae and Erap in Markham, which were established
in 1970-80s. Tambul’s climate is wet and cool with high rainfall per annum (2500 mm).
The Highlands Halfbred sheep flock in Tambul was thought to have been established
from flocks from Aiyura and Menifo and PNG genotype goats from Simbu Province.
The flocks at Baisu are managed by a correctional service (a government
institution). The foundation flock for Baisu was provided from Tambul. There were
approximately 70 sheep and goats available during sample collection.
Menifo is a government research and breeding station for sheep. It was
established in 1975. It had 55 sheep and 15 goats at the time of sampling.
The flocks in Benabena, Goroka, Korefeigu, Daulo and Chuave are owned by
smallholder farmers. These flocks were thought to have been established from flocks in
Menifo and Aiyura government breeding stations. Smallholder flocks were established
much earlier than those in research institutional farms (Labu and Tambul) and
consisted of Highlands Halfbred sheep and PNG genotype goats.
2.5 Animals
2.5.1 Sheep and goats
For the present study, a total of 504 faecal samples were collected directly
from the rectum of sheep (n = 276) and goats (n = 228) and stored in 25 mL screw top
plastic containers (Table 2-2). Most animals sampled were adults. No lambs or goat
kids were sampled as only a few were present during the sampling period and it was
difficult to obtain faecal samples from them. During sampling, the following factors
were recorded for each animal; faecal moisture and consistency and clinical symptoms
such as active versus lethargic, bright pink versus pale mucous membranes, coughing,
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
83
chest congestion and diarrhea. Almost all the faeces collected were hard, dry pellets or
soft moist pellets. On a few occasions, liquid/fluid faeces were encountered but they
were either too small in quantity or too watery and difficult to collect.
Table 2-2: Number (N) of sheep and goat samples collected in the present study.
Type of farm Sheep (N) Goat (N)
Research Institute (Labu) 40 43
Research Institute (Tambul) 115 35
Public Institution (Baisu) 27 39
Government Station (Menifo) 40 6
Smallholder 54 105
Total 276 228
Handling of faecal samples
All faecal samples were processed in a NARI laboratory in Labu, Morobe
Province. Samples that were collected from the flocks in Labu were taken directly to
the laboratory and processed within a day. In contrast, samples collected from the rest
of the study sites were kept in ice-filled Coleman Coolers (for up to 10 days), until
transported to the laboratory for processing. At Labu, each faecal sample from a 25 mL
screw top container was placed into a 2 mL Eppendorf tubes and preserved in 70 %
ethanol for molecular screening. Excess samples were left in the 25 ml container for
morphological analyses by a faecal flotation technique (Whitlock, 1948). All samples
were kept at 4 °C until shipment or analysis.
2.5.2 Fish
A total of 614 fish from cultured freshwater, wild freshwater and wild marine
environments were collected (Fig. 2-3). Cultured fish (n = 133) included three species,
which were collected from four smallholder cultured freshwater fish-ponds in
Mumeng, Asaro, Kundiawa and Bathem (Table 2-3).
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
84
Figure 2-3: Pictures of fishing activities in PNG. A. A fish-pond in Bathem village. B. A fish farmer in Sausi. C. Freshwater fish market in Pagwi near the Sepik River. D. The field team processing fish near a river in Bathem. E & F, Toilet huts over the sea and the estuary, respectively, in Madang.
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
85
Wild freshwater fish (n = 205) included six species and were collected from
Ramu and Sepik Rivers, while 276 fresh marine fish, consisting of 16 species were
bought from local fishermen in Bilbil, Madang, Pilapila and Tavana (Table 2-3).
Table 2-3: Cultured freshwater, wild freshwater and marine fish species collected in the present study.
Cultured freshwater fish Locations
Kundiawa Asaro Mumeng Bathem Total
Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) 36 20 27 - 83
Common carp (Cyprinus carpio) - 11 32 - 43 Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) - - - 7 7
Total 36 31 59 7 133
Wild freshwater fish Ramu River Sepik River Total
Silver barb (Puntius gonionotus)
13 39
52
Highfin catfish (Neoarius berneyi)
- 20
20 Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus)
- 15
15
Pacu (Colossoma bidens)
- 34
34 Indo-Pacific tarpon (Megalops cyprinoides)
- 70
70
Redtail catfish (Phractocephalus hemioliopterus)
- 14
14
Total
13 192 205
Wild marine fish Bilbil Madang Pilapila Tavana Total
Bigeye scad (Selar crumenophthalmus) 46 - 60 - 106
Bigeye trevally (Caranx sexfasciatus) 4 - - - 4
Blackfin barracuda (Sphyraena qenie) 9 - - - 9 Coachwhip trevally (Carangoides oblongus) - - - 1 1 Indo-Pacific tarpon (Megalops cyprinoides) 4 - - - 4
Mackerel scad (Decapterus macarellus) 5 - 24 - 29
Oblong silver biddy (Gerres oblongus) 1 - - 54 55
Oriental bonito (Sarda orientalis) - 4 - - 4
Pinjalo snapper (Pinjalo pinjalo) - - 1 - 1
Rainbow runner (Elagatis bipinnulatus) - 5 - - 5
Reef needlefish (Strongylura incisa) - 4 - - 4
Slender pinjalo (Pinjalo lewisi) - - - 14 14 Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus maculatus) - 3 - - 3
Talang queenfish (Scomberoides commersonnianus) - 2 - 2
Wahoo (Acanthocybium solandri) - 1 - - 1
Yellow fin tuna (Thunnus albacares) - 34 - - 34
Total 69 51 87 69 276
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
86
On average, the time when fish were at the stalls before being sold and the
time lag between purchasing and processing the fish was approximately 4 h. The only
live fish collected were from the aquaculture farms. These were euthanized by ice
slurry. Length and weight of each fish were measured. Fish were necropsied, checked
for worms under white light and further dissected. The stomach and intestinal walls
were removed using a scalpel blade. Parts of the gut (stomach and intestinal walls)
tissues were placed into 2 mL Eppendorf tubes and preserved in 70 % ethanol for
molecular screening. Remaining stomach and intestinal tissues were fixed in 10 %
buffered formalin for histological analysis. The stomach and intestinal walls were
collected because protozoan parasites (Cryptosporidium and Giardia) attach to the
surface epithelia of these regions of the gut and cause a range of histological
abnormalities (Chen et al., 2012). All samples were stored at 4 °C in PNG until sample
collection was completed.
2.6 Shipment of biological samples
Preserved samples were packaged according to the International Air Transport
Association (IATA) standard of shipment of biological samples and transported by air to
Perth, Western Australia. Appropriate permits were obtained in PNG for export and in
Australia for import.
2.7 Parasitology
2.7.1 Faecal worm egg count
All faecal worm egg counts were performed in Madang, PNG, using a modified
McMaster technique (Whitlock, 1948). For this method, approximately, 2 g of faeces
were weighed and placed in a 60 mL mixing jar and 2.5 mL of tap water was added to
soften the faecal pellets. The faeces were mashed up using a pair of forceps and
allowed to soak for more than 1 h. A flotation salt solution (saturated sodium chloride
solution with specific gravity 1.20 – 1.25) was added to the sample to make a final
volume of 50 mL solution. The faecal suspension was mixed vigorously using a tongue
depressor until a homogenous solution was obtained. Using a pipette, 0.6 mL of
solution were drawn out from the center of the mixed faecal suspension and added to
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
87
the counting chamber of a Whitlock Paracytometer slide. The eggs were allowed 10
minutes (maximum time) to float up under the glass before counting at 40x
magnification using a light microscope (Zeiss Axio Scope). All visible eggs within the
double line boundaries of the Whitlock Paracytometer counting chamber were
identified and recorded.
Parasites were identified morphologically to genus, or (in the case of
pathogenic trichostrongyles) to superfamily level (superfamily = Trichostrongyloidea)
using published keys (Soulsby, 1965) (Fig. 2-4). Parasite egg load was expressed as eggs
per gram faeces (EPG). The volume of the flotation fluid used in the examinations was
50 mL and the fluid volume examined in the counting chamber was 0.3 mL. Since EPG
is calculated using Equation [1], the minimum EPG count in our analyses was 83 eggs
per gram and occurred when only one egg was observed in the counting chamber.
[1]
Figure 2-4: Trichostrongylid egg (left) and Eimeria oocyst (right) at 40x magnification.
2.7.2 Morphological analysis of anisakid nematodes
Whole nematodes were cleared in lactophenol for more than 48 h and
individually mounted onto microscope slides. The body lengths of the nematodes were
directly measured. Images were taken with an Olympus BX50 light microscope
equipped with Olympus DP70 Camera at 40x and 100x magnification. The following
features were measured: body width, oesophagus length, ventriculus length and
mucron length. Morphological identification was conducted according to keys
previously reported (Berland, 1961; Cannon, 1977; Shamsi et al., 2009a, b).
Scanning electron micrographs (SEMs) were taken for representative
specimens to study further morphological details. SEMs were obtained on a Phillips
total volume [mL]EPG eggs counted
( examined volume [mL] weight of faeces [g])
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
88
XL30 scanning electron microscope at the Centre for Microscopy Characterisation and
Analysis (CMCA) at the University of Western Australia. For SEM, parasite samples
were fixed in 2 % glutaraldehyde and 1 % paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffer saline
(PBS) for 60 minutes at 4 °C and washed twice with PBS (pH = 7.4) in 1.5 mL Eppendorf
tubes. Samples were dehydrated using a PELCO Biowave microwave processor
(TedPella Inc., Redding, CA, USA) by passage through increasing ethanol
concentrations in water (33 %, 50 %, 66 % and 100 %), followed by two washes in dry
acetone. Samples were then dried in a critical point dryer (Emitech 850, Quorum
Technologies, Ashford, UK), attached to aluminium sample holders and coated with a 5
nm thick platinum coating to enable surface electrical conduction.
2.8 DNA isolation
2.8.1 Isolation of genomic DNA from faeces
Genomic DNA was extracted directly from faeces using a PowerSoil® DNA
isolation kit (MO BIO laboratories, Carlsbad, California, USA). The kit is designed to
remove faecal PCR inhibitors, which potentially increases the DNA quality.
Approximately, 0.25 grams of each faecal sample were placed in a Powerbead tube
and then mixed by vortexing. To ensure complete lysis of any Cryptosporidium oocysts
that may have been present, five freeze thaw cycles were conducted, which consisted
of dipping the sample into liquid nitrogen for approximately 10 seconds until frozen
and then incubating at 95 °C until thawed. Sixty microliters of solution C1 were then
added to the Powerbead tubes containing the sample and the mixture was again
mixed by vortexing. The Powerbead tube was secured horizontally onto a flat-bed
vortex pad with tape and vortexed at maximum speed for 10 minutes and then
centrifuged at 10, 000 x g for 30 seconds at room temperature. The supernatant was
then transferred to a clean 2 mL collection tube. To this, 250 µL of solution C2 were
added and the contents were mixed by vortexing for 5 seconds and incubated at 4 °C
for 5 minutes. After incubation, the tube was centrifuged at room temperature for 1
minute at 10, 000 x g and approximately 600 µL of supernatant was transferred to a
clean 2 mL collection tube and 200 µL of solution C3 were added to it. The tubes were
vortexed briefly and incubated at 4 °C for 5 minutes. Following incubation, the tubes
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
89
were centrifuged at room temperature for 1 minute at 10, 000 x g. Up to 750 µL of
supernatant were collected in a clean 2 mL collection tube and 1, 200 µL of solution C4
were added to the supernatant. The solutions were mixed by vortexing for 5 seconds.
Approximately, 675 µL of the supernatant mixture were loaded onto a spin filter,
which captures the DNA. The tube was centrifuged at 10, 000 x g for 1 minute at room
temperature. The flow-through was discarded. An additional 675 µL of supernatant
mixture were loaded onto the spin filter and the process was repeated until all the
remaining supernatant were loaded onto the spin filter and centrifuged. This was
followed by an addition of 500 µL of solution C5 (ethanol wash solution) to rinse the
captured DNA by centrifugation at room temperature for 30 seconds at 10, 000 x g.
The flow-through was discarded. The spin filter tubes were centrifuged again and the
spin filter was placed in a clean 2 mL collection. To concentrate the DNA, 50 µL of
solution C6 (sterile DNA elution buffer) (instead of the recommended 100 µL) was then
added to the centre of the white filter membrane of the spin filter, and the tube was
centrifuged at room temperature for 30 seconds at 10, 000 x g to elute the DNA. The
spin filter was discarded and the tube containing the DNA was stored at -20 °C.
2.8.2 Isolation of genomic DNA from anisakid larvae
A Qiagen DNeasy® blood and tissue kit (Catalogue number: 69504, Qiagen,
Hilden, Germany) was used to isolate DNA from the anisakid nematodes analysed in
the present study. The kit contains InhibitEX® tablets that remove PCR inhibitors from
the DNA. Also, the kit includes a tissue lysis step using the enzyme, Proteinase K, to
digest protein and remove contamination from preparations of DNA. The protocol
(spin-column protocol) for the purification of total DNA from animal tissues on page 28
of the DNeasy® blood and tissue handbook was followed with minor modifications.
Prior to DNA extraction, each nematode larva was cut into small pieces to
enable more efficient lysis. Approximately, 25 mg of cut sample was placed in a 1.5 mL
microcentrifuge tube and 180 μL Buffer ATL and 20 μL Proteinase K were added. The
sample was mixed thoroughly by vortexing and incubated at 56 °C for 3 h for complete
tissue lysis. Several times during incubation, the tube was vortexed briefly to disperse
the sample. After incubation, the tube was vortexed for 15 seconds followed by
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
90
addition of 200 μL Buffer AL and thorough mixing by vortexing. The mixture was
pipetted into the DNeasy® Mini spin-column within a 2 mL collection tube. The tube
was centrifuged at 10, 000 x g for 1 minute. The flow-through and collection tube was
discarded. The DNeasy® Mini spin-column was placed in a clean 2 mL collection tube.
Five hundred µL of buffer AW1 were loaded onto the DNeasy® Mini spin-column and
centrifuged at 10, 000 x g for 1 minute. Again, the flow-through and the collection tube
were discarded. The DNeasy® Mini spin-column was placed in another clean 2 mL
collection tube and 500 μL of buffer AW2 were loaded onto it. The column was
centrifuged at 20, 000 x g for 3 minutes. Again the flow-through and the collection
tube were discarded. The DNeasy® Mini spin-column was placed in a clean 1.5 mL
collection tube and 50 μL (instead of the recommended 200 µL) of buffer AE were
loaded directly onto the DNeasy® Mini spin-column membrane. The tube was
incubated at room temperature for 1 minute, and then centrifuged at 10, 000 x g for 1
minute to elute the DNA. All extracted samples were stored at -20 °C until screening.
2.8.3 Isolation of genomic DNA from fish gut scrapings
Preserved intestines and stomachs were washed 5 times with water to remove
the ethanol and scraped using a scalpel blade. DNA was isolated from 0.25 grams of
the tissue scrapings using a PowerSoil® DNA isolation kit (MO BIO laboratories,
Carlsbad, California, USA) as described in Section 2.8.1. DNA was eluted in 50 µL of
elution buffer. All extracted samples were stored at -20 °C until screening.
2.9 DNA amplification
As a precaution and to avoid contamination with PCR product, the PCR
reactions were prepared in a designated pre-PCR area (separated from amplification
areas). PCR contamination controls were used including negative controls (no DNA).
Quantitative PCRs were performed on a Rotor-Gene 6000 thermocycler (Corbett
Research, Victoria, Australia) for detection of trichostrongyles, Giardia and Chlamydia
and on a Roche LightCycler® 480 thermocycler (Roche, Castle Hill, NSW, Australia) for
Eimeria. All single step and nested PCRs were performed in a Perkin Elmer Gene Amp
PCR 2400 thermocycler (Perkin Elmer, Foster City, CA, USA). The magnesium chloride
(MgCl2) and deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs) were ordered from (Fisher
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
91
Biotech, Wembley, WA, Australia). All probes were synthesised by Biosearch
Technologies (Novato, CA, USA) and primers were ordered from InvitrogenTM
(http://www.lifetechnologies.com/au/en/home/brands/invitrogen.html).
2.9.1 Molecular detection of trichostrongylid nematodes by qPCR
A previously developed multiplex quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay was used (Yang
et al., 2014e). Primers and probe for Haemonchus were modified from Harmon et al.
(2007a). A fragment (92 bp) of the Haemonchus rRNA ITS1 region was amplified using
the forward primer HC-ITS F1 (5’-CATATACATGCAACGTGATGTTATGAA-3’), the reverse
primer HC-ITS R1 (5’-GCTCAGGTTGCATTATACAAATGATAAA-3’) and the probe (5’-FAM-
ATGGCGACGATGTTC-BHQ1-3’). The Haemonchus probe was prepared by substitution
of C-5 propynyl-dC (pdC) for dC and C-5 propynyl-dU (pdU) for dT to enhance base
pairing and duplex stability. A fragment (143 bp) of the Teladorsagia ITS2 region was
amplified using the primers TC-ITS2 F1 (5’-TCTGGTTCAGGGTTGTTAATGAAACTA-3’) and
TC-ITS2R1 (5’-CCGTCGTACGTCATGTTGCAT-3’) and the probe (5’- CAL Fluor Orange 560
– TGTGGCTAACATATAACACTGTTTGTCGA- BHQ1-3’). A fragment of Trichostrongylus
ITS1 region (114 bp) was amplified using TS ITS1 F1 (5’-AGTGGCGCCTGTGATTGTTC-3’),
TS ITS1 R1 (5’-TGCGTACTCAACCACCACTA-3’) and the probe (5’-CAL Fluor Red 610–
TGCGAAGTTCCCATCTATGATGGTTGA-BHQ2-3’).
An internal amplification control (IAC) was included in this qPCR assay to
monitor faecal inhibition. An IAC is a non-target DNA sequence present in the same
sample reaction tube which is co-amplified simultaneously with the target sequence
(Hoorfar et al., 2003). Inhibition can be due to malfunction of the thermal cycler,
incorrect PCR mixture, poor polymerase activity and the presence of inhibitory
substances in the sample matrix (Hoorfar et al., 2003). Thus, in a PCR with an IAC, a
control signal will always be produced even when there is no target sequence present
and when neither IAC signal nor target signal is produced, the PCR has failed.
In this PCR assay, an IAC consisting of a fragment of a coding region from
Jembrana Disease Virus (JDV) cloned into a pGEM-T vector (Promega, Madison, WI,
USA) was used, as previously described (Yang et al., 2013). The IAC primers were JDVF
(5’-GGTAGTGCTGAAAGACATT-3’) and JDVR (5’-ATGTAGCTTGACCGGAAGT-3’) and the
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
92
probe was 5’-Cy5-TGCCCGCTGCCTCAGTAGTGC-BHQ2-3’ (Yang et al., 2013). Inhibition
in faecal samples was measured using the IAC, as the IAC was added to all faecal DNA
samples to detect any PCR inhibitors present in the extracted DNA. If any inhibition is
present in a sample, the IAC will not produce a signal.
The total volume of this assay was 15 μL and contained 3 mM MgCl2, 1μL of
2.5nM dNTPs, 1x PCR buffer, 1.0 U Kapa DNA polymerase (Kapa Biosystems, Cape
Town, South Africa), 0.2 μM each of forward and reverse primers, 0.1 mM probe, 0.2
μM each of forward and reverse IAC primers, 50 nM of the probe, 50 nM of IAC probe,
10 copies of IAC template and 1 μL of sample DNA. The PCR cycling conditions
consisted of a pre-melt at 95 °C for 3 minutes and then 45 cycles of 95 °C for 30
seconds, and a combined annealing and extension step of 60 °C for 45 seconds.
2.9.2 Molecular detection of Eimeria spp. by qPCR and nested PCR.
For molecular detection of Eimeria, a subset of samples from sheep and goats
were initially screened at the 18S rRNA locus by qPCR and then genotyped using a
nested PCR.
qPCR for Eimeria
A qPCR assay was used to screen for Eimeria species in faecal samples of sheep
and goats at the 18S rRNA locus as previously described (Yang et al., 2014d). The assay
consisted of a forward primer, Eim F1 (5’-CGAATGGCTCATTAAAACAGTTATAGTT-3’), a
reverse primer, Eim R1 (5’-CGCATGTATTAGCCATAGAATTACCA-3’) and a probe (5’-Joe-
ATGGTCTCTTCCTACATGGA-BHQ1-3’), which produced an 85 bp product (Yang et al.,
2014d). An internal amplification control (IAC) was included to check if any inhibition
was occurring in the sample (Yang et al., 2013) (see Section 2.9.1).
The total reaction volume in this assay was 15 μL. The reaction mixture
contained 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dNTP, 1x PCR buffer, 1.0 U Kapa DNA polymerase (Kapa
Biosystems, Cape Town, South Africa). 0.2 μM each of forward and reverse primers,
0.2 μM each of forward and reverse IAC primers, 50 nM of the probe, 50 nM of IAC
probe, 10 copies of IAC template and 1 μL of sample DNA (Yang et al., 2014d). The PCR
cycling conditions consisted of a pre-melt at 95 °C for 3 minutes and then 45 cycles of
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
93
95 °C for 30 seconds, and a combined annealing and extension step of 60 °C for 45
seconds.
Eimeria 18S rDNA PCR-Sequencing
A nested PCR technique was used to amplify a subset of samples, which were
positive for Eimeria by qPCR at the 18S rRNA locus. The primers used for the
amplification of the 18S rRNA were those developed by Relman et al. (1996). For the
primary PCR, the forward primer was CYCF1E (5’-GGAATTCCTACCCAATGAAAACAGTTT-
3’) and reverse primer was CYCR2B (5’-CGGGATCCAGGAGAAGCCAAGGTAGG-3’)
(Relman et al., 1996). For the secondary PCR, the forward primer was CYCF3E (5’-
GGAATTCCTTCCGCGCTTCGCTGCGT-3’) and the reverse primer was CYCR4B (5’-
CGGGATCCCGTCTTCAAACCCCCTACTG-3’) (Relman et al., 1996).
The total reaction volume of the primary PCR assay was 25 µL, which contained
1 µL of genomic DNA, 2 mM MgCl2, 200 µM of each dNTP, 12.5 pmol each of forward
and reverse primers, 1x Kapa Taq buffer and 0.05 U/µL of Kapa Taq DNA polymerase
(Kapa Biosystems, Cape Town, South Africa). PCR was performed as previously
described (Pieniazek et al., 1996), with an initial denaturation of 95 °C for 4 minutes,
followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 30 seconds (denaturation), 55 °C for 30 seconds
(annealing), 72 °C for 90 seconds (extension) and a final extension at 72 °C for 10
minutes.
In the secondary PCR, a product of approximately 497 - 498 bp in length was
amplified using 1 µL of primary PCR product and nested forward CYCF3E and reverse
CYCR4B primers. The conditions were the same as for the primary PCR, except that the
annealing temperature was 60 °C.
2.9.3 Molecular detection of Cryptosporidium spp. using nested PCR
In the present study, nested PCRs were performed to screen for
Cryptosporidium species in faecal samples from sheep and goats and in guts of fish at
the 18 rRNA, actin and gp60 loci. A positive control (C. parvum) was included in all sets
of reactions.
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
94
Cryptosporidium 18S rRNA PCR
For the primary PCR, the forward primer, 18SiCF2 (5’-
GACATATCATTCAAGTTTCTGACC-3’) and the reverse primer, 18SiCR2 (5’-
CTGAAGGAGTAAGGAACAACC-3’) were used to produce a product with an approximate
length of 763 bp as previously described (Ryan et al., 2003). The total reaction volume
for this assay was 25 µL, which contained 1 µL of genomic DNA, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 µM
of each dNTP, 12.5 pmol each of forward and reverse primers, 1x Kapa Taq buffer and
0.05 U/µL of Kapa Taq DNA polymerase (Kapa Biosystems, Cape Town, South Africa).
The cycling conditions consisted of an initial hot start (94 °C for 5 minutes), followed by
48 cycles of 95 °C for 40 seconds (denaturation), 58 °C for 30 seconds (annealing) and
72 °C for 45 seconds (extension), and a final extension at 72 °C for 7 minutes.
In the secondary PCR, 1 µL of primary PCR product were included in the
reaction mixture containing forward primer 18SiCF1 (5’-CCTATCAGCTTTAGACGGTAGG-
3’) and reverse primer 18SiCR1 (5’-TCTAAGAATTTCACCTCTGACTG-3’) to produce a
product of approximately 587 bp in length. The conditions of the secondary PCR were
identical to those in the primary PCR.
For the samples that failed to amplify using the nested PCR described above, a
smaller fragment (298 bp) was amplified using the forward primer, 18SiF (5’-
AGTGACAAGAAATAACAATACAGG-3’) and reverse primer, 18SiR (5’-
CCTGCTTTAAGCACTCTAATTTTC-3’) as previously described (Morgan et al., 1997). PCR
amplification was performed in 25 µL volumes with 1 µL of genomic DNA, 10 pmol
each of forward and reverse primers, 200 µM concentration of each dNTP, 2 mM
MgCl2, 1x Kapa Taq buffer 0.05 U/µL of Kapa Taq DNA polymerase (Kapa Biosystems,
Cape Town, South Africa). The cycling conditions consisted of an initial hot start (94 °C
for 5 minutes), followed by 48 cycles of 95 °C for 30 seconds (denaturation), 60 °C for
30 seconds (annealing) and 72 °C for 40 seconds (extension) and a final extension at
72 °C for 7 minutes.
Cryptosporidium actin PCR
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
95
Attempts were made to screen Cryptosporidium-positive samples from piscine
hosts at the actin locus using a previously described assay (Ng et al., 2006), however,
amplifications were unsuccessful.
Piscine-derived Cryptosporidium actin PCR
A new set of semi-nested actin primers were designed using the software,
Primer 3 (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/), based on actin gene sequences of piscine-derived
Cryptosporidium. Those primers were used in a semi-nested PCR protocol to amplify
samples from fish, which were Cryptosporidium-positive at the 18S rRNA locus.
For the primary PCR, the forward primer, Actinall F1 (5’-
GTAAAATACAGGCAGTT-3’) and the reverse primer, Actinall R1 (5’-
GGTTGGAACAATGCTTC-3’) were used to produce a product with an approximate
length of 392 bp. The total reaction volume for this assay was 25 µL, which contained
1 µL of genomic DNA, 2.0 mM MgCl2, 200 µM of each dNTP, 12.5 pmol each of forward
and reverse primers, 1x Kapa Taq buffer and 0.05 U/µL of Kapa Taq DNA polymerase
(Kapa Biosystems, Cape Town, South Africa). The cycling conditions consisted of an
initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 4 minutes followed by 45 PCR cycles, 95 °C for 30
seconds (extension), 46 °C for 30 seconds (annealing), and 72 °C for 30 seconds
(extension), with a final extension at 72 °C for 7 minutes.
In the secondary PCR, a product of approximately 278 bp in length was
amplified using 1 µL of primary PCR product and forward primer, Actinall F2 (5’-
CCTCATGCTATAATGAG-3’) and the Actinall R1 reverse primer described above. The
conditions for the secondary PCR were identical to those used in the primary PCR.
Cryptosporidium gp60 PCR
Cryptosporidium parvum and C. hominis positive samples were further
subtyped at the 60kDa glycoprotein (gp60) locus using a nested PCR assay as
previously described (Sulaiman et al., 2005). In the primary PCR, a fragment of the
gp60 gene (approximately 800 bp in length) was amplified using the forward AL3531
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
96
(5’-ATAGTCTCCGCTGTATTC-3’) and reverse AL3533 (5’-GAGATATATCTTGGTGCG-3’)
primers (Peng et al., 2001; Sulaiman et al., 2005).
The total reaction volume for this assay was 25 µL, which contained 1 µL of
genomic DNA, 3.0 mM MgCl2, 200 µM of each dNTP, 12.5 pmol each of forward and
reverse primers, 1x Kapa Taq buffer and 0.05 U/µL of Kapa Taq DNA polymerase (Kapa
Biosystems, Cape Town, South Africa). PCR was performed under the following
conditions: 95 °C for 4 minutes followed by 40 PCR cycles, 95 °C for 48 seconds
(extension), 50 °C for 45 seconds (annealing), and 72 °C for 30 seconds (extension),
with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 minutes.
In the secondary PCR, a product of approximately 400 bp in length was
amplified using forward primer AL3532 (5’-TCCGCTGTATTCTCAGCC-3’), reverse primer
LX0029 (5’-CGAACCACATTACAAATGAAGT-3’) and 1 µL of the primary PCR product
(Sulaiman et al., 2005). The conditions of the secondary PCR assay were identical to
those in the primary PCR assay except that the annealing time was reduced to 45
seconds.
2.9.4 Molecular detection of Giardia spp. using qPCR and nested PCR
Samples from sheep, goats and fish were initially screened at the glutamate
dehydrogenase (gdh) locus using a qPCR assay, followed by attempts to genotype
Giardia by PCR and sequencing at the gdh, triphosphate isomerase gene (tpi) and beta
(β) giardin (bg) loci. However, amplifications using nested PCRs were unsuccessful.
Positive control DNA samples of G. duodenalis assemblage A, B and/or E were included
in all sets of reaction runs.
qPCR at the Giardia glutamate dehydrogenase (gdh) locus
For the qPCR assay, the forward primer, gdhF1 (5’-GGGCAAGTCCGACAACGA-
3’), the reverse primer gdhR1 (5’-GCACATCTCCTCCAGGAAGTAGAC-3’) and the probe
(5’-Quasar 670-TCATGCGCTTCTGCCAG-BHQ2-3’) were used to produce a product of
approximately 261 bp in length as previously described (Yang et al., 2014b). IAC was
included to check if any inhibition was occurring in the sample (Yang et al., 2013) (see
Section 2.9.1).
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
97
The total volume of the PCR mixture was 15 μL, which contained 5 mM MgCl2,
1 mM dNTPs, 1x PCR buffer, 1.0 U Kapa Taq DNA polymerase (Kapa Biosystems, Cape
Town, South Africa), 0.2 μM each of forward and reverse primers, 0.2 μM each of
forward and reverse IAC primers, 50 nM of the probe, 50 nM of IAC probe, 10 copies of
IAC template and 1 μL of sample DNA. The PCR cycling conditions consisted of a pre-
melt at 95 °C for 3 minutes and then 45 cycles of 95 °C for 30 seconds, and a combined
annealing and extension step at 60 °C for 45 seconds.
Semi-nested PCR at the Giardia gdh locus
Attempts were made to amplify Giardia-positive samples at the gdh locus as
previously described (Read et al., 2004). The semi-nested PCR assay involved an
external forward primer, GDHeF (5’-TCAACGTYAAYCGYGGYTTCCGT-3’), an internal
forward primer, GDHiF (5’-CAGTACAACTCYGCTCTCGG-3’) and a reverse primer, GDHiR
(5’-GTTRTCCTTGCACATCTCC-3’), which produced a product of approximately 432 bp in
length (Read et al., 2004).
In the primary PCR, the primers GDHeF and GDHiR were used. The total
reaction volume for this assay was 25 µL, which contained 1 µL of genomic DNA, 1.5
mM MgCl2, 200 µM of each dNTP, 12.5 pmol each of forward and reverse primers, 1x
Kapa Taq buffer and 0.05 U/µL of Kapa Taq DNA polymerase (Kapa Biosystems, Cape
Town, South Africa). The cycling conditions consisted of an initial hot start at 95 °C for
4 minutes, followed by 55 PCR cycles, 95 °C for 30 seconds (denaturation), 56 °C for 20
seconds (annealing), and 72 °C for 45 seconds (extension) and then a final extension at
72 °C for 7 minutes.
In the secondary PCR, 1 µL of primary PCR product and nested forward GDHiF
and reverse GDHiR primers were included to produce a product of 432 bp in length
(Read et al., 2004). The conditions for the secondary PCR were identical to the primary
PCR. However, the amplifications were not successful, even with variations to the
initial assay conditions. Those variations included:
[1] the addition of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at a final concentration of 5 %,
[2] the use of fresh aliquots of dNTPs, primers or Kapa Taq DNA polymerase,
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
98
[3] Kapa Taq DNA polymerase was replaced with Tth Plus DNA Polymerase
(Fisher Biotech Catalogue number: TP-1), and
[4] Testing a range of different PCR thermocyclers.
Nested PCR at the Giardia tpi locus
A nested PCR was used to amplify the triphosphate isomerase (tpi) gene of
Giardia positive isolates using primers complementary to the conserved sequences of
various Giardia parasites in the primary PCR and assemblage-specific primers in the
secondary PCR. Positive controls for G. duodenalis assemblages A, B and E were
included in all reaction runs.
In the primary PCR, primers AL3543 (5’-AAATIATGCCTGCTCGTCG-3’) and
AL3546 (5’-CAAACCTTITCCGCAAACC-3’) were used to amplify a product of
approximately 605 bp in length as previously described (Sulaiman et al., 2003). The
total reaction volume for this assay was 25 µL, which contained 1 µL of genomic DNA,
3 mM MgCl2, 200 µM of each dNTP, 12.5 pmol each of forward and reverse primers, 5
% DMSO, 1x Kapa Taq buffer and 0.05 U/µL of Kapa Taq DNA polymerase (Kapa
Biosystems, Cape Town, South Africa). The cycling conditions were 95 °C for 4 minutes,
followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 45 seconds (denaturation), 50 °C for 45 seconds
(annealing) and 72 °C for 60 seconds (extension). The cycle was followed by a final
extension at 72 °C for 10 minutes.
In the secondary PCR, assemblage-specific primers and 1 µL of the primary PCR
product were used to screen for G. duodenalis assemblages A, B and E as previously
described (Geurden et al., 2008a; 2009). Listed below are the primers and their
annealing temperatures:
For the amplification of the tpi gene of assemblage A, primers Af 5’-
CGCCGTACACCTGTCA 3’ and Ar (5’-AGCAATGACAACCTCCTTCC-3’) were used to
amplify a product of approximately 332 bp in length. The annealing
temperature for this primer set was 64 °C (Geurden et al., 2008a).
For assemblage B, primers Bf (5’-GTTGTTGTTGCTCCCTCCTTT-3’) and Br (5’-
CCGGCTCATAGGCAATTACA-3’) were used to amplify a product of
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
99
approximately 400 bp in length. The annealing temperature for this primer set
was 62 °C (Geurden et al., 2009).
For assemblage E, primers Ef (5’-CCCCTTCTGCCGTACATTTAT-3’) and Er (5’-
GGCTCGTAAGCAATAACGACTT-3’) were used to amplify a PCR product of
approximately 388 bp in length. The annealing temperature for this primer set
was 67 °C (Geurden et al., 2008a).
The total reaction volume for each assemblage-specific PCR assay was 25 µL, which
contained 1 µL of genomic DNA, 3 mM MgCl2, 200 µM of each dNTP, 12.5 pmol each of
forward and reverse primers, 1x Kapa Taq buffer and 0.05 U/µL of Kapa Taq DNA
polymerase (Kapa Biosystems, Cape Town, South Africa). The cycling conditions were
95 °C for 5 minutes, followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 45 seconds (denaturation), 64 °C
for 45 seconds (annealing) for the assemblage A-specific primer or 62 °C for
assemblage B-specific primer or 64 °C for assemblage E-specific primer and 72 °C for 45
seconds (extension). The final extension was at 72 °C for 7 minutes.
Nested PCR at the Giardia β-giardin locus
Attempts were made to amplify the β-giardin gene using different nested PCR
protocols. Initially primers designed by Caccio et al. (2002) and Lalle et al. (2005b) were
used. Specifically, forward primer, G7 (5’-AAGCCCGACGACCTCACCCGCAGTGC-3’) and
reverse primer, G759 (5’-GAGGCCGCCCTGGATCTTCGAGACGAC-3’) were used in the
primary PCR (Caccio et al., 2002). For the secondary PCR, forward primer, βGiarF (5’-
GAACGAACGAGATCGAGGTCCG-3’) and the reverse primer, βGiarR (5’-
CTCGACGAGCTTCGTGTT-3’) were used (Lalle et al., 2005a).
In the primary PCR reaction, primers G7 and G759 were used to produce a
product of approximately 753 bp in length as previously described (Caccio et al., 2002).
The total reaction volume of this assay was 25 µL, which contained 1 µL of genomic
DNA 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 µM of each dNTP, 12.5 pmol each of forward and reverse
primers, 1x Kapa Taq buffer and 0.05 U/µL of Kapa Taq DNA polymerase (Kapa
Biosystems, Cape Town, South Africa). The cycling condition consisted of an initial hot
start (95 °C for 4 minutes), followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 30 seconds
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
100
(denaturation), 65 °C for 30 seconds (annealing) and 72 °C for 60 seconds (extension),
and a final extension at 72 °C for 7 minutes. In the secondary PCR, a product of
approximately 511 bp in length was produced using 1 µL of primary PCR product and
nested primers βGiarF and βGiarR (Lalle et al., 2005b). The conditions of the secondary
PCR were identical to those used in primary PCR except that the annealing
temperature was 55 °C.
Amplification at the β-giardin was also attempted using primers designed by Dr.
Rongchang Yang, Murdoch University in a semi-nested PCR. Primers BGexF (5’-
CCCGACGACCTCACCCGCAGT-3’) and BGRev (5’-GCTCGGCCTTCTCGCGGTCG-3’) were
used in the primary PCR assay to produce a product of 682 bp in length. Primers BGinF
(5’-CCTTGCGGAGATGGGCGACACA-3’) and BGRev were used in the secondary PCR
assay to amplify a product of approximately 380 bp in length.
The total reaction volume for this PCR assay was 25 µL, which contained 1 µL of
genomic DNA in the primary PCR (1 µL of primary PCR product in the secondary PCR), 3
mM MgCl2, 200 µM of each dNTP, 5 % DMSO, 12.5 pmol each of forward and reverse
primers, 1x Kapa Taq buffer and 0.05 U/µL of Kapa Taq DNA polymerase (Kapa
Biosystems, Cape Town, South Africa). The cycling conditions for both primary and
secondary PCR assays consisted of an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 minutes,
followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 30 seconds, 55 °C for 30 seconds and 72°C for 60
seconds and a final extension at 72 °C for 7 minutes.
2.9.5 Molecular detection of anisakid nematodes using PCR
To determine the species of anisakid nematodes isolated from fish, two single
step PCR assays were performed. The first assay involved the amplification of the
nuclear ribosomal DNA (rDNA) region spanning the first internal transcribed spacer,
the 5.8S gene and the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS-1, 5.8S, ITS-2). The
second assay involved the amplification of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase
subunit 2 gene (mt-DNA cox2). Positive (genomic DNA from L3 Anisakis typica larvae)
controls were included in all PCR reactions.
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
101
Anisakid ITS region PCR
The ITS rDNA region of the anisakid nematodes were amplified using the
forward primer NC5 (5’-GTAGGTGAACCTGCGGAAGGATCAT-3’) and the reverse primer
NC2 (5’-TTAGTTTCTTTTCCCTCCGCT-3’) by Zhu et al. (1998) in a single step PCR assay.
The total reaction volume for this assay was 25 µL, which contained 1 µL of genomic
DNA, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 µM of each dNTP, 12.5 pmol each of forward and reverse
primers, 1x Kapa Taq buffer and 0.05 U/µL of Kapa Taq DNA polymerase (Kapa
Biosystems, Cape Town, South Africa). The cycling conditions were an initial
denaturation at 95 °C for 5 minutes, followed by 30 cycles of 95 °C for 30 seconds
(denaturation), 60 °C for 30 seconds (annealing) and 72 °C for 45 seconds (extension),
then a final extension at 72 °C for 10 minutes (Kijewska et al., 2009b).
Anisakid mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II (cox2) PCR
A 629 bp fragment of the mitochondrial DNA cytochrome oxidase II (cox2) gene
was amplified using primers 210 (5’-CACCAACTCTTAAAATTATC-3’) and 211 (5’-
TTTTCTAGTTATATAGATTGRTTYAT-3’) (Nadler and Hudspeth, 2000). The total reaction
volume for this assay was 25 µL, which contained 1 µL of genomic DNA, 2.5 mM MgCl2,
200 µM of each dNTP, 12.5 pmol each of forward and reverse primers, 1x Kapa Taq
buffer and 0.05 U/µL of Kapa Taq DNA polymerase (Kapa Biosystems, Cape Town,
South Africa). The conditions were an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 4 minutes,
followed by 34 cycles of 95 °C for 30 seconds (denaturation), 46 °C for 60 seconds
(annealing) and 72 °C for 90 seconds (extension), then a final extension at 72 °C for 10
minutes (Valentini et al., 2006).
2.9.6 Molecular detection of Chlamydia spp. by qPCR
A multiplex qPCR assay was used to detect Chlamydia abortus and Chlamydia
pecorum in faecal samples from sheep and goats as previously described (Yang et al.,
2014c). This assay targets the outer membrane protein cell surface antigen gene
(ompA) using species-specific primers, which were originally designed as singleplex
qPCRs by Pantchev et al. (2009, 2010). IAC was included to check if any inhibition was
occurring in the sample (Yang et al., 2013) (see Section 2.9.1).
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
102
A C. abortus species-specific qPCR, which produces an 86 bp product, was
amplified using the forward primer CpaOMP1-F (5’-GCAACTGACACTAAGTCGGCTACA-
3’), the reverse primer CpaOMP1-R (5’-ACAAGCATGTTCAATCGATAAGAGA-3’) and the
probe CpaOMP1-Sb (5’-dFAM-TAAATACCACGAATGGCAAGTTGGTTTAGCG-BHQ-1-3’) as
previously described (Pantchev et al., 2009). A species-specific 76 bp product was
amplified from C. pecorum using the forward primer CpecOMP1 F (5’-
CCATGTGATCCTTGCGCTACT-3’), the reverse primer CpecOMP1 (5’-
TGTCGAAAACATAATCTCCGTAAAAT-3’) and the probe CpecOMP1-S (5’-CAL-Fluor
Orange -560-TGCGACGCGATTAGCTTACGCGTAG-TAMARA-3’) as previously described
(Pantchev et al., 2010).
The total volume of this assay was 15 μL and contained 4 mM MgCl2, 1 mM
dNTPs, 1x PCR Buffer, 1.0 U Kapa DNA polymerase (Kapa Biosystems, Cape Town,
South Africa)0.2 μM each of forward and reverse primers, 0.2 μM each of forward and
reverse IAC primers, 50 nM of the probe, 50 nM of IAC probe, 10 copies of IAC
template and 1 μL of sample DNA (Yang et al., 2014c). The reaction was performed
under the following conditions: a pre-melt at 95 °C for 3 minutes, followed by 45 cycles
of 95 °C for 20 seconds (denaturation), and a combined annealing and extension step
of 60 °C for 45 seconds.
2.10 Agarose gel electrophoresis
PCR products were allowed to run on 1 % agarose (Fisher Biotech cat. No.
901b) dissolved in 1x TAE buffer (40 mM Tris-HCl, 20 mM acetate, 2 mM EDTA, pH
adjusted to 8.0 with water) and stained with 0.025 µL/mL SYBR® safe DNA gel stain
(Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA). A 1kb Plus DNA ladder (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was
added on a single lane along with PCR products to determine the size of PCR products.
Post electrophoresis products were visualized by UV transillumination using a
BIO Rad Gel Doc 1000 transilluminator (Bio-Rad laboratories, Gladesville, NSW,
Australia). Bands with correct lengths were cut out from the gel using a scalpel blade.
Each cut-out band was placed in a separate 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube with appropriate
labels.
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
103
2.11 PCR product extraction from gel
Two methods were used to extract the DNA from the gel after electrophoresis.
A commercial, Ultra Clean® DNA purification, kit (MolBio, West Carlsbad, CA, USA), was
used to purify all PCR products generated for anisakid nematodes in Chapter 6
according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For products described in chapters 3 and
4, a simple tip elution method was used to purify DNA amplicons from the sliced gels
(Yang et al., 2013). Briefly, positive bands were cut from the gel and the gel fragment
were transferred to a 100 µL filter tip (with the end cut off) (Axygen, Fisher Biotech,
Wembley, WA, Australia) and then placed in a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube and centrifuged
at 20, 000 x g for 1 minute. The filter tip was then discarded and the eluent was
retained and used for sequencing without any further purification.
2.12 DNA sequencing PCR with dye terminator kit
The purified PCR products were subjected to sequencing PCR using an ABI
Prism™ Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA)
according to the manufacturer’s instruction, with the exception that the annealing
temperatures varied (depending on the annealing temperature of individual primers).
Briefly, the reaction volume for sequencing PCR was 10 µL, which contained 1. 5 µL of
5x sequencing buffer (Applied Biosystems), 1 µL BigDye® Terminator (Applied
Biosystems), 3.2 pmol primer (either forward or reverse primer), 5 - 20 ng PCR product
and deionised water. Both forward and reverse primers were used; each primer was
used in a separate reaction. The reactions were performed on a Perkin Elmer Gene
Amp PCR 2400 thermal cycler (Perkin Elmer, Foster City, CA, USA) under the following
conditions: 96 °C for 2 minutes (initial denaturation) followed by 25 cycles of 96 °C for
10 seconds (denaturation), 50 - 60 °C for 5 seconds (annealing) and 60 °C for 4 minutes
(extension).
2.13 Post reaction purification
After thermal cycling, the reaction products were purified to remove salts and
unincorporated dye terminators. For purification, the products were transferred from
their original 0.2 mL tubes to 0.6 mL tubes and ethanol precipitation was performed as
described below. Briefly, DNA was precipitated by adding 1 μL of 125 mM EDTA, 1 μL
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
104
of 3 M sodium acetate (pH = 5.2) and 25 μL of 100 % ethanol (Sigma-Aldrich Pty Ltd,
Castle Hill, NSW, Australia). The solution was mixed gently by using a pipette and
incubated at room temperature for 20 minutes. After incubation, the DNA precipitate
was centrifuged for 30 minutes at 20, 000 x g. The supernatant was discarded and 125
μL of 70 % ethanol was added to the remaining precipitate to rinse the DNA pellet. This
was followed by further centrifugation for 5 minutes at 20, 000 x g. The resulting
supernatant was discarded and the purified DNA pellet was dried using a Savant
SpeedVac® Concentrator (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for 10 minutes
and submitted for sequencing.
2. 14 DNA Sequencing
DNA sequencing was performed on an Applied Biosystems 3730 DNA Analyser
Instrument (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA) by a specialist (Frances
Brigg) in the State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre (SABC) at Murdoch University, WA
(http://www.sabc.murdoch.edu.au/).
2.15 Phylogenetic analysis
The nucleotide sequences obtained were analysed using FinchTV 1.4.0
(Geospiza, Inc.; Seattle, WA, USA; http://www.geospiza.com) and compared with
published sequences for identification using the for Biotechnology Information Basic
Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) for species
identification, developed by the National Institute of Health’s National Centre.
Sequences were aligned with known reference sequences using both the
Clustal Omega alignment tool (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/) and
MUSCLE alignment (Edgar, 2004), in the MEGA5 software (Tamura et al., 2011). The
resultant alignments were adjusted manually using the MEGA5 software.
Phylogenetic trees were constructed using additional sequences retrieved from
GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/). Distance estimation was
conducted using MEGA5 (Tamura et al., 2011) based on evolutionary distances
calculated using p-distance method (Nei and Kumar, 2000), the Kimura two-parameter
model (Kimura, 1980) or the Tamura-Nei model (Tamura and Nei, 1993) and grouped
Chapter 2 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
105
using neighbour-joining (NJ) (Saitou and Nei, 1987). Parsimony and maximum
likelihood (ML) analyses were also conducted using MEGA5 (Tamura et al., 2011).
More details of the individual phylogenetic analyses conducted are provided in the
specific chapters of this thesis. Reliabilities for the trees were tested using 1000
bootstrap replications (Felsenstein, 1985) and bootstrap values exceeding 70 were
considered well supported (Hills and Bull, 1993).
2.16 Statistics
Prevalences were expressed as percentage of positive samples with 95 %
confidence intervals calculated assuming a binomial distribution using the software
Quantitative Parasitology 3.0 (Rozsa et al., 2000). Differences in prevalence among
groups were compared by Fisher’s Exact Test (for two groups) or Chi-square analysis
(for three or more groups). P values < 0.05 were considered significant. Greater details
of the individual statistical analyses conducted are provided in specific chapters.
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism GraphPad Prism version 4
for Windows, GraphPad Software, San Diego, California, USA (www.graphpad.com).
Chapter 3
3. Prevalence and infection levels of helminth
and coccidian parasites in sheep and goat in
PNG
The contents of this chapter, specifically, the microscopy analyses have been
published in the Journal of Helminthology. The article is listed below and can be found
in Appendix B.
Koinari, M., Karl, S., Ryan, U., Lymbery, A.J., 2013. Infection levels of gastrointestinal
parasites in sheep and goats in Papua New Guinea. Journal of Helminthology 87, 409-
415.
This chapter describes the analyses of faecal samples from sheep and goats for
helminths and coccidian parasites. Two methods were used: (1) faecal flotation and
microscopic analysis (results of which have been published in the Journal of
Helminthology) and (2) qPCR detection for trichostrongylid nematodes and Eimeria sp.
Research highlights:
The overall parasite prevalence by microscopy was 72 % (79/110) in sheep and
89 % (49/55) in goats. (one or more species of gastrointestinal parasite detected)
(Note this does not include Cryptosporidium and Giardia. Cryptosporidium
requires specific stains. Also, microscopic examinations have a relatively low
sensitivity for these parasites due to their small size were only screened for by
PCR).
The gastrointestinal parasites found by microscopy in both sheep and goats were
trichostrongylid nematodes, Eimeria, Strongyloides, Fasciola, Trichuris and
Nematodirus. (Note: trichostrongylids/trichostrongyles refers to the superfamily
Trichostrongyloidea and not the genus Trichostrongylus).
Two additional genera were found in goats: Moniezia and Dictyocaulus.
The prevalence of each trichostrongyles by qPCR in sheep (S) and goats (G) were;
Haemonchus contortus 41.1 % (S) and 41.7 % (G); Teladorsagia circumcincta 21.3
% (S) and 24.1 % (G) and Trichostrongylus spp. 14.8 % (S) and 14 % (G).
The prevalence of Eimeria spp. by qPCR was 64.9 % (37/57) for sheep and 91.9 %
(34/37) for goats.
This is the first study to report Eimeria in goats and Dictyocaulus in small
ruminants in PNG.
Chapter 3 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
109
3.1 Introduction
Gastrointestinal parasites are recognised as a major threat to the production of
sheep and goats in both small and large scale-farms as described in Chapter 1.
In PNG, the distribution and productivity of small ruminants are hindered
mainly by poor health, nutrition and management (Quartermain, 2004a). There have
been various reports on the infections of sheep and goats with gastrointestinal
parasites including nematodes, cestodes and Coccidia (listed in Table 1-2, Chapter 1),
(Varghese & Yayabu, 1985; Owen, 1988a; 1989b; 1998c and reviewed by Quartermain,
2004b). However, those surveys have been performed on animals raised in
government or institutional farms and there is a lack of information on the
epidemiology of gastrointestinal parasites infecting sheep and goats in smallholder
farms. Such information is essential for understanding the economic impact these
parasites can have on farmers and to support decision-making regarding the treatment
and prevention of parasitic diseases in these animals.
The aims of the present study were to obtain data on the prevalence, infection
levels and species of gastrointestinal parasites in different farm management types
over a wide geographic area. Specifically, the parasites were identified in fresh faecal
samples based on the morphology of their eggs or oocysts using the McMaster
technique (Whitlock, 1948) and light microscopy. Furthermore, molecular tools were
used to identify trichostrongyles (H. contortus, T. circumcincta and Trichostrongylus
spp.) and Eimeria spp.
3.2 Methods
This section summarises only the most important methods used to obtain the
results described in this chapter (Fig. 3-1). A detailed description of all the methods can
be found in Chapter 2 of this thesis.
3.2.1 Sample collection
Sampling was conducted from February to April 2011 in two broad agro-climatic
zones, the highlands (all study sites, except Labu) and lowlands (Labu) in the central
region of mainland PNG (Fig. 2-1 in Chapter 2). These sites are located in a wet tropic
Chapter 3 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
110
environment and receive high annual rainfall predominantly during the wet season,
which lasts from October to May (Quartermain, 2004b). Specific details of the study
sites including the climate data are presented in Chapter 2, Section 2.3.1 and Table 2-1.
Figure 3-1: Flow chart of methods used for screening gastrointestinal parasites from faecal samples of sheep and goats. After sample collection, a subset of faecal samples was analysed using parasitological methods involving faecal flotation and light microscopy in PNG. The rest of the samples was preserved in 70 % ethanol and transported to Murdoch University, WA, for molecular screening. DNA was extracted using a commercial kit and qPCR assays were performed using established methods.
For the comparison of prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites among study
sites, the study sites were divided into farm types:
Research institutions: Tambul in high altitude and Labu in lowland
Public institutions: Baisu
Government farms: Menifo
Smallholder farms: Korefeigu, Benabena, Goroka, Daulo and Chuave
Furthermore, for comparison of farm management systems, data from the institutional
farms (Labu, Tambul and Baisu) were pooled because in institutional farms,
anthelmintics were given to animals regularly to control gastrointestinal parasites,
Chapter 3 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
111
whereas no anthelmintics were administered to the smallholder flocks. Also, there
were high stocking rates at institutional farms but not in the smallholder farms.
Fresh faecal samples were obtained directly from the rectum of sheep and
goats and put into 25 mL (screw top) containers in ice-filled Coleman coolers until
processing at a NARI laboratory in Labu. Each faecal sample from the 25 mL container
was placed into 2 mL Eppendorf tubes and preserved in 70 % ethanol for molecular
screening. Excess samples were left in the 25 ml tubes for morphological analyses by a
faecal flotation technique (the time lag between sample collection and microscopic
examination was 15 - 20 days). All samples were stored at 4 °C. Samples for molecular
analyses were transported to Murdoch University, WA.
3.2.2 Parasitology
A subset of faecal samples consisting of 110 from sheep and 55 from goats
were used for microscopic examinations. Approximately two grams of each faecal
sample were examined using a modified McMaster technique (Whitlock, 1948). The
detailed procedure is described in Chapter 2, Section 2.7.1 ‘Faecal worm egg count’.
3.2.3 DNA isolation
Total DNA was extracted from 250 mg of faeces using a PowerSoil® DNA
isolation kit (MO BIO laboratories, Carlsbad, California, USA) as described in Chapter 2,
Section 2.8.1. All extracted samples were stored at -20 °C until required for screening.
3.2.4 Screening of trichostrongyles and Eimeria species by qPCR
A species-specific qPCR assay was performed to detect H. contortus,
T. circumcincta and Trichostrongylus spp. in faecal samples of sheep (n = 263) and
goats (n = 228) as described in Chapter 2, Section 2.9.1.
A qPCR was also used to screen for Eimeria in faecal samples of sheep (n = 57)
and goats (n = 37) at the small subunit rRNA locus (Yang et al., 2014d), while a nested
PCR was used to amplify samples, which were positive for Eimeria by qPCR for
genotyping (Pieniazek et al., 1996) as described in Chapter 2, Section 2.9.2. Only two
Chapter 3 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
112
Eimeria-positive samples from goats were successfully sequenced at the 18S rRNA
locus.
3.2.5 Data analysis
Prevalence was calculated as the percentage of positive samples in the total
number of samples examined. Apart from the overall prevalence (i.e. infection with
gastrointestinal parasites) in each flock, prevalence was also calculated for each
parasite type, stratified by animal species (Table 3-1); sheep breed, agro-ecological
zone and farm management type (Table 3-2) and different farm types (Table 3-3). For
comparison of agro-ecology and farm management systems, data for sheep and goats
were combined (Table 3-2). Differences in prevalence among groups were compared by
Fisher’s exact test (FET) (for two groups) (specifically, Tables 3-1 and 3-2) or chi-square
analysis (for more than two groups) (Table 3-3). FET were used where sample sizes
were relatively small (n ranged from 27 to 127) as FET is more accurate for smaller
sample sizes. Where multiple pairwise comparisons were made among groups, a
Bonferroni correction was applied to maintain an experiment-wide Type I error rate of
5 %.
EPG counts were transformed to their decadic logarithms to obtain a normal
distribution of values prior to statistical testing for significant differences between
animal species, sheep breed, agro-ecological zones and farm types. Differences
between two groups were compared by t-tests (Table 3-1 and Table 3-2) and among
more than two groups by one-way analysis of variance (1-way ANOVA); followed by a
post-hoc, Tukey’s HSD, test (Table 3-3).
For qPCR amplification, the threshold cycle (Ct) values obtained from the
amplification plots were used to determine whether the sample was positive for each
of the trichostrongylid nematodes (Fig. 3-2). Differences in prevalence between farm
types (Table 3-5 to Table 3-7) were compared by Fisher’s exact test (FET) and a
Bonferroni correction was applied as described above.
Chapter 3 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
113
Figure 3-2: qPCR amplification plot for H. contortus as an example at the ITS-1 locus. Data was acquired at FAM channel for H. contortus, at JOE channel for T. circumcincta and at ROX channel for Trichostrongylus species. A threshold (red horizontal line) was adjusted manually in the exponential phase of PCR. The threshold cycle (Ct) is the cycle number at which the fluorescent signal of the reaction crosses the threshold (arrow) and was used to determine the presence of each gastrointestinal parasite in the sample. For example, where the yellow line crosses the threshold (arrow), the corresponding Ct value is 18. Ct threshold values were automatically set by the real time PCR software (Rotor-Gene 6.1.93, Corbett Research, Mortlake, NSW, Australia).
3.3 Results
3.3.1 Infection levels of gastrointestinal parasites by microscopy
From a total of 165 faecal samples from small ruminants (110 from sheep and
55 from goats) examined by microscopy, gastrointestinal parasites were found in 128
(77.6 %) animals, with 71.8 % (79/110) of sheep and 89.1 % (49/55) of goats having
one or more species of gastrointestinal parasites. The overall prevalence of
gastrointestinal parasites in goats was significantly higher than in sheep (FET: p =
0.017). Of the 128 positives, 39 % (50/128) had two or more types of gastrointestinal
parasites; 32.9 % (26/79) of sheep and 49 % (24/49) of goats (not significantly different
by FET: p = 0.09).
The gastrointestinal parasites found and their prevalences in sheep (S) and in
goats (G) were as follows: trichostrongylids 67.3 % (S), 85.5 % (G); Eimeria 17.3 % (S),
16.4 % (G); Strongyloides, 8.2 % (S), 23.6 % (G); Fasciola, 5.5 % (S), 18.2 % (G); Trichuris,
1.8 % (S), 3.6 % (G); and Nematodirus, 1.8 % (S), 3.6 % (G). Two additional genera were
Chapter 3 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
114
found in goats: Moniezia (9.1 %) and Dictyocaulus (3.6 %). The prevalence of
trichostrongylids (FET: p = 0.0002), Strongyloides (FET: p = 0.013) and Fasciola (FET: p =
0.013) were significantly higher in goats than in sheep. In addition, the mean EPG
counts for trichostrongylids were significantly higher in goats than in sheep (t-test: p =
0.014). Prevalences and mean EPG counts in all the sampling sites, stratified by the
type of host animal (sheep or goat) and the type of parasite are listed in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1: Gastrointestinal parasite prevalence and mean ± SD EPG counts stratified by gastrointestinal parasite type for sheep and goats. N = the total number of faecal samples. P = the number of animals, which were positive for one or more gastrointestinal parasites. Given in parentheses are percent prevalences and 95 % confidence intervals (CI). EPG counts are given as means ± SD. Where no SD value is given on the mean EPG count, there was only a single or few positive observations with the same values so that SD could not be calculated. * = values are significantly different between sheep and goats by either FET or t-test.
Goat (N = 55) Sheep (N = 110)
Parasite P (%, 95 % CI) EPG P (%, 95 % CI) EPG
Trichostrongylids 20* (36.7, 24.0 - 50.5) 745 ± 622* 74 (67.3, 57.6 - 75.4)* 762 ± 1264*
Strongyloides sp. 13 (23.6, 13.7 - 37.3) 277 ± 437 9 (8.2, 4.1 - 15.4) 323 ± 377
Eimeria sp. 9 (16.4, 8.2-2.9) 203± 103 19 (17.3, 11 - 25.9) 633 ± 1467
Fasciola sp. 10 (18.2, 9.5 - 31.4) 257± 275 6 (5.5, 2.2 - 12) 125 ± 46
Trichuris sp. 2 (3.6, 0.6 -1 3.6) 125 ± 59 2 (1.8, 0.3 - 7.1) 111 ± 48
Moniezia sp. 5 (9.1, 3.4 - 20.7) 116 ± 46 0 0
Dictyocaulus sp. 2 (3.6, 0.6 - 13.6) 83 ± 0 0 0
Nematodirus sp. 2 (3.6, 0.6 - 13.6) 249 ± 117 2 (1.8, 0.3 - 7.1) 111 ± 48
Total 49/55 (89.1)* 927 ± 821* 79/110 (72.8)* 909 ± 1795*
Prevalence and mean EPG counts for gastrointestinal parasites stratified by
agro-ecology, farm management systems (institutional vs smallholder) and sheep
breed are given in Table 3-2. The prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in the two
agro-ecological zones ranged from 2.4 % (Moniezia and Trichuris) to 75 %
(trichostrongyles) in the highlands, while it ranged from 4.9 % (Moniezia and Trichuris)
to 68.3 % (trichostrongyles) in the lowlands (Table 3-2). For the farm management
systems, the prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites ranged from 1.7 % (Trichuris) to
74.8 % (trichostrongyles) in institutional farms and 2 % (Moniezia) to 70 %
(trichostrongyles) in smallholder farms (Table 3-2). Similarly, in sheep breeds, the
Chapter 3 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
115
prevalence ranged from 3.7 % (Strongyloides) to 66.7 % (trichostrongyles) for Priangan
sheep and from 3.6 % (Fasciola, Trichuris, Nematodirus,) to 67.5 % (trichostrongyles)
for Highlands Halfbred sheep (Table 3-2).
No statistically significant differences were found in the prevalence of each
gastrointestinal parasite type between the agro-ecological zones (FET: p > 0.05), the
farm management systems (FET: p > 0.05), or the sheep breeds (FET: p > 0.05), with
one exception. That is, the prevalence of Fasciola was higher in the lowland than the
highland (FET: p = 0.028) agro-ecological zone. Similarly, there were no differences in
EPG for most of the parasite types between the specific groups with the exception of
Eimeria. The mean EPG for Eimeria was higher in the highlands than in the lowlands
(Labu) (t-test: p = 0.045). In addition, the mean EPG for Eimeria was higher in the
smallholder farms than in institutional flocks (t-test: p = 0.004) and the mean EPG for
Eimeria in the Highlands Halfbred sheep was higher than in the Priangan sheep (t-test:
p = 0.045).
The prevalence and the mean EPG counts for each parasite in different farm
types (research and public institutions, government and smallholder) are given in Table
3-3. Trichostrongylid nematodes, Strongyloides and Eimeria were prevalent in both
sheep and goats in all 5 farm types except where no data were obtained (as for goats in
the government farm). There were no statistically significant differences in the
prevalence, but there were several significant differences in EPG counts for different
gastrointestinal parasite types across the different farms types. The mean EPG counts
for goats infected with Strongyloides sp. in Tambul (highland research institution) were
significantly higher than the ones in Labu (lowland research institution) (1-way ANOVA:
F = 3.91, p = 0.05, Tukey’s test: p < 0.05). For sheep, the mean EPG count for Eimeria in
Labu was significantly lower than in Menifo (1-way ANOVA: F = 3.41, p = 0.045; Tukey’s
test: p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed for the other genera of
gastrointestinal parasites. Fasciola was found in sheep in the research institutes (Labu
and Tambul) and in smallholder farms and in goats from Labu, Baisu and smallholder
farms (Table 3-3). Trichuris occurred in sheep from smallholder and government farms
and in goats only in Labu (Table 3-3).
Table 3-2: Gastrointestinal parasite prevalence and mean EPG counts stratified for agro-ecology, farm management and sheep breed. N = the number of animals examined. Prevalence = animals infested with one or more gastrointestinal parasite type. (%) = percent prevalence. EPG counts are given as mean ± SD. Where no SD value is given on the mean EPG count, there was only a single or few positive observations with the same EPG values so that SD could not be calculated. * = values are significantly different between sheep and goats by either FET or t-test. Institution = both research (Labu and Tambul) and the public (Baisu), H/Halfbred = Highlands Halfbred sheep.
Agro-ecology Farm Management Sheep Breed
Highlands Lowlands Institutional Smallholder Priangan H/Halfbred
N = 124 N = 41 N = 115 N = 50 N = 27 N = 83
Prevalence (% P)
Trichostrongyles 93 (75) 28 (68.3) 86 (74.8) 35 (70) 18 (66.7) 56 (67.5)
Strongyloides 18 (14.5) 4 (9.8) 14 (12.2) 8 (16) 1 (3.7) 8 (9.6)
Eimeria 18 (14.5) 10 (24.4) 15 (13.1) 13 (26) 7 (25.9) 12 (14.5)
Fasciola 8 (6.5)* 8 (19.5)* 12 (10.4) 4 (8) 3 (11.1) 3 (3.6)
Trichuris 3 (2.4) 2 (4.9) 2 (1.7) 3 (6) 0 3 (3.6)
Moniezia 3 (2.4) 2 (4.9) 4 (3.5) 1 (2) 0 0
Dictyocaulus 0 2 (4.9) 2 (1.7) 0 0 0
Nematodirus 5 (4) 0 5 (4.3) 0 0 3 (3.6)
EPG (mean ± SD)
Trichostrongyles 818±1156 551±605 748±942 775±1316 405±570 889±1412
Strongyloides 278±375 374±582 357±491 189±151 1246 208±160
Eimeria 696±1492* 133±80* 133±69* 913±1723* 95±32* 948±1796*
Fasciola 228±283* 187±165 152±141 374±362 166 83
Trichuris 111±48 126±59 125±59 111±48 0 111±48
Moniezia 138±48 83 104±42 166 0 0
Dictyocaulus 0 83 83 0 0 0
Nematodirus 166±102 0 166 0 0 111±48
Table 3-3: Gastrointestinal parasite prevalence and mean ± SD EPG counts for gastrointestinal parasite type and farm type. NS and NG are the total number of faecal samples collected at each study site for sheep and goats, respectively. P = the number of animals infested with one or more gastrointestinal parasite type. Given in parentheses (%) is the percent prevalence. EPG counts are given as means ± SD. Where no SD value is given on the mean EPG count, there was only a single or few positive observations with the same EPG values so that SD could not be calculated. * = values are significantly different by 1-way ANOVA/Tukey’s HSD testing.
Research (Labu) Research (Tambul) Public institution Government Smallholder
(NS=27, NG=14) (NS=29, NG=4) (NS=19, NG =22,) (NS=19, NG=0) (NS=16, NG=15)
Sheep P (%) EPG P (%) EPG P (%) EPG P (%) EPG P (%) EPG
Trichostrongyles 18 (66.7) 406 ± 570 20 (69) 1216 ± 1585 15 (78.9) 603 ± 389 10 (52.6) 1087 ± 2303 11 (68.8) 445 ± 677
Strongyloides 1 (3.7) 1246 5 (17.2) 266 ± 180 1 (5.3) 83 1 (5.3) 166 1 (6.3) 83
Eimeria 7 (25.9) 95 ± 31* 2 (6.9) 125 ± 59 0 0 6 (31.6) 1605 ± 2453* 4 (25) 374 ± 220
Fasciola 3 (11.1) 166 2 (6.9) 83 0 0 0 0 1 (6.3) 83
Trichuris 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (5.3) 166 2 (12.5) 83
Moniezia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dictyocaulus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nematodirus 0 0 2 (6.9) 125 ± 59 1 (5.3) 83 0 0 0 0
Goat
Trichostrongyles 10 (71.4) 813 ± 603 3 (75) 478 ± 212 20 (90.9) 706 ± 713 no data 14 (93.3) 810 ± 582
Strongyloides 3 (21.4) 831 2 (50) 960 ± 996* 2 (9.1) 83 6 (40) 210 ± 170
Eimeria 3 (21.4) 221 ± 95 0 0 3 (13.6) 138 ± 48 3 (20) 249 ± 143
Fasciola 5 (35.7) 199 ± 216 0 0 2 (9.1) 83 3 (20) 470 ± 374
Trichuris 2 (14.3) 125 ± 59 0 0 0 0 0 0
Moniezia 2 (14.3) 83 0 0 2 (9.1) 125 ± 59 2 (6.7) 166
Dictyocaulus 2 (14.3) 83 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nematodirus 0 0 0 0 9.1 249 ± 117 0 0
Chapter 3 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
Nematodirus was found in sheep in two sites (Baisu and Tambul) and in goats only
from Baisu (Table 3-3). Moniezia was only found in goats from flocks in Labu, Baisu and
smallholder farms (Table 3-3). Dictyocaulus was only found in goats from Labu (Table
3-3). There was also a trend for goats to be more heavily infected than sheep in all
areas. Specifically, in Labu, mean EPG for trichostrongyles (t-test: p = 0.021) and
Eimeria (t-test: p = 0.004) were higher in goats than in sheep. Also, in smallholder
farms, the prevalence of Strongyloides sp. was higher in goats than in sheep (FET: p =
0.037) and mean EPG for trichostrongyles in goats was higher than in sheep (t-test: p =
0.006).
3.3.2 Prevalence of trichostrongylid nematodes by qPCR
Genomic DNA from faeces of 263 sheep and 228 goats were screened using
qPCR to detect H. contortus, T. circumcincta and Trichostrongylus spp. The prevalence
of each nematode in sheep (S) and goats (G) were: H. contortus 41.1 % (S) and 41.7 %
(G); T. circumcincta 21.3 % (S) and 24.1 % (G) and Trichostrongylus spp. 14.8 % (S) and
14 % (G) (Table 3-4). There were significant differences among H. contortus,
T. circumcincta and Trichostrongylus spp. for both sheep (Chi-square = 51.4, df = 2, p <
0.0001) and goats (Chi-square = 19.26, df = 2, p < 0.0001).
Differences in the prevalence of H. contortus in sheep between the different
types of farms were statistically significant. Statistical data for comparison of
prevalences for H. contortus in sheep between two farm types are given in Table 3-5.
Specifically, the prevalence of H. contortus in Tambul (research institute) was higher
than Labu (research institute), Baisu (public institute) and Menifo government farm
(FET: p values < 0.005) (Table 3-5). In addition, the prevalence of H. contortus in Baisu
was higher than in Labu, Menifo and smallholder farms (Table 3-5). There was,
however, no significant difference in the prevalence of H. contortus in goats between
farm types for all pairs of farm (FET: p values > 0.005).
There were no significant differences in the prevalence of T. circumcincta in
sheep or goats between farm types for all pairs of farms (FET: p values > 0.005).
There were significant differences in the prevalence of Trichostrongylus spp. in
sheep among the different types of farms (Table 3-6). The prevalence of
Chapter 3 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
119
Trichostrongylus spp. in sheep from the public institution (Baisu) was significantly
higher than in Tambul, government (Menifo) and smallholder farms (Table 3-6).
However, there were no significant differences in the prevalence of Trichostrongylus
spp. in goats for all pairs of farms (FET: p values > 0.005).
Table 3-4: Prevalence of trichostrongylid nematodes for sheep and goats. N = the total number of animals examined in each farm type. P = the number of animals, which were positive for one of the trichostrongyles. Given in parentheses are the per cent prevalence (%) and 95 % confidence interval (CI). RI (Labu) = lowland research institute, RI (Tambul) = highland research institute, PI = Public Institute.
Type of farm N P (%, 95 % CI) P (%, 95 % CI) P (%, 95 % CI)
Sheep H. contortus T. circumcincta Trichostrongylus
RI (Labu) 40 10 (25.0; 13.3-41.5) 4 (10.0; 3.3-24.6) 6 (15.0; 6.3-30.1)
RI (Tambul) 109 64 (58.7; 48.9-67.9) 33 (30.3; 22-39.9) 15 (13.8; 7.2-20.3)
PI (Baisu) 27 19 (70.4; 52.0-88.9) 3 (11.1;2.9-30.3) 12 (44.4; 24.4-64.5)
Government 37 4 (10.8; 3.5-26.4) 6 (16.2; 6.8-32.7) 2 (5.4; 1.5-17.7)
Smallholder 50 11 (22.0; 10.1-33.9) 10 (20.0; 8.5-31.5) 4 (8.0; 0.2-15.8)
Total 263 108 (41.1; 35.1-47.1) 56 (21.3; 16.3-26.3) 39 (14.8; 10.5-19.2)
Goat
RI (Labu) 43 20 (46.5; 31.0-62.0) 14 (32.6; 18.0-47.2) 5 (11.6; 1.7-21.6)
PI (Tambul) 35 19 (54.3; 37.0-71.7) 10 (28.6; 12.8-44.3) 5 (14.3; 2.1-26.5)
PI (Baisu) 39 15 (38.5; 22.5-54.4) 6 (15.4; 3.5-27.3) 4 (10.3; 0.3-20.2)
Government 6 3 (50; 14-86.1) 3 (50; 14-86.1) 1 (16.7; 0.8-63.5)
Smallholder 105 38 (36.2; 26.9-45.5) 22 (21.2; 13.2-29.1) 17 (16.2; 9.0-23.4)
Total 228 95 (41.7; 35.2-48.1) 55 (24.1; 18.5-29.7) 32 (14.0; 9.5-19.6)
Table 3-5: Comparisons of prevalences for H. contortus in sheep among the farm types.All pairs of farms were compared by Fisher’s exact test. A Bonferroni correction was used to determine significance at p values < 0.005. RI = Research Institute, PI = Public Institute.
Data set 1 Data set 2 Significant p values
Lowland RI (Labu) Highland RI (Tambul) Yes p = 0.0004
Lowland RI (Labu) PI (Baisu) Yes p = 0.0004
Lowland RI (Labu) Government (Menifo) No p = 0.1429
Lowland RI (Labu) Smallholder No p = 0.8047
Highland RI (Tambul) PI (Baisu) No p = 0.3782
Highland RI (Tambul) Government (Menifo) Yes p < 0.0001
Highland RI (Tambul) Smallholder Yes p < 0.0001
PI (Baisu) Government (Menifo) Yes p < 0.0001
PI (Baisu) Smallholder Yes p < 0.0001
Government (Menifo) Smallholder No p = 0.2521
Chapter 3 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
120
Table 3-6: Comparisons of prevalences for Trichostrongylus spp. in sheep among the farm types. All pairs of farms were compared by Fisher’s exact test (FET). A Bonferroni correction was used to determine significance at p values < 0.005. RI = Research Institute, PI = Public Institute.
Data set 1 Data set 2 Significant p values
Lowland RI (Labu) Highland RI (Tambul) No p = 1
Lowland RI (Labu) PI (Baisu) No p = 0.0102
Lowland RI (Labu) Government (Menifo) No p = 0.2715
Lowland RI (Labu) Smallholder No p = 0.5034
Highland RI (Tambul) PI (Baisu) Yes p = 0.0009
Highland RI (Tambul) Government (Menifo) No p = 0.2399
Highland RI (Tambul) Smallholder No p = 0.4308
PI (Baisu) Government (Menifo) Yes p = 0.0004
PI (Baisu) Smallholder Yes p = 0.0003
Government (Menifo) Smallholder No p = 1
3.3.3 Prevalence of Eimeria in sheep and goats by qPCR
The prevalence of Eimeria was 64.9 % (37/57) for sheep and 91.9 % (34/37) for
goats (Table 3-7). There was a significant difference in prevalence between sheep and
goats (FET: p = 0.030).
Table 3-7: Overall prevalence of Eimeria in sheep and goats by qPCR. N = the total number of faecal samples. P = the number of animals, which were positive for Eimeria. Given in parentheses are the percent prevalence (% P) and 95 % confidence interval (CI). * = values are significantly different between sheep and goats by FET. RI = Research Institute.
Type of farm N P (% P; 95 % CI)
Sheep
Lowland RI (Labu) 7 5 (71.4; 30.3-94.9)
Highland RI (Tambul) 19 13 (68.4; 43.5-86.4)
Public Institute (Baisu)
Not analysed
Government (Menifo) 10 7 (70, 35.4-91.9)
Smallholder 21 12 (57.1; 34.4-37.4)*
Total 57 37 (64.9; 51.1-76.8)*
Goats
Lowland RI (Labu) 8 8 (100; 59.8-100)
Highland RI (Tambul) 4 3 (75; 21.9-98.7)
Public Institute (Baisu) 3 3 (100; 31-100)
Government (Menifo) 2 2 (100; 19.8-100)
Smallholder 20 18 (90; 66.9-98.3)*
Total 37 34 (91.9; 77-98.3)*
Chapter 3 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
121
No significant associations were found between sheep and goats in each farm
types with the exception that the prevalence of Eimeria for goats was higher than for
sheep in smallholder farms (FET: p = 0.0325).
Molecular typing of Eimeria
Positive samples from goats were genotyped at the 18S rRNA locus and two
isolates (GE62 and GE72) from smallholder farms were typed as Eimeria zuernii.
Unfortunately, samples from sheep could not be genotyped because chromatogram
sequences were unreadable.
3.4 Discussion
Overall, 77.6 % (128/165) of the examined farm animals in PNG were infected
with one or more types of gastrointestinal parasites by microscopy. This high rate of
gastrointestinal parasitism has also been observed in other tropical countries such as
Ethiopia and Kenya (Maichomo et al., 2004; Regassa et al., 2006). Trichostrongyles has
the highest prevalence (67.3 % in sheep and 85. 5 % in goats), followed by Eimeria
(16.4 - 17.3 %), Strongyloides (8.2 - 23.6 %), Fasciola (5.5 - 18.2 %), Trichuris (1.8 - 3.6
%) and Nematodirus (1.8 - 3.6 %) (Table 3-1). A similar trend in prevalence for these
species have also been reported in other countries (Gadahi et al., 2009; Dagnachew et
al., 2011). This high parasite prevalence may be attributed to poor farm management
practises, such as short pasture rest times, poor nutrition and lack of anthelmintic
treatment. In all the farms studied, mixed-species flocks grazed or browsed on natural
forage on the same land for most of the time or were moved to other areas with only
short pasture rest times. In smallholder farms, sheep and goats were allowed to graze
freely or were tethered in available communal pasture during the day and housed at
night on daily basis. In institutional and government farms, the flocks were also
allowed to graze at daytime and housed at night but the pastures were divided into
paddocks (n = 3 to 5). Sheep and goats were allowed to graze in one paddock for up to
2 weeks and then changed to the next one. Studies in Fiji, Tonga, Malaysia and the
Philippines found that nematodes (especially, H. contortus and T. colubriformis) have
short survival times (3 to 4 days) on pasture and suggested rotational grazing as an
effective measure for parasite control (Banks et al., 1990; Barger et al., 1994; Cheah
Chapter 3 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
122
and Rajamanickam, 1997; Baker and Gray, 2004). PNG has similar climate as those
countries, and therefore if rotational grazing is proposed, 3.5 days would be suitable
for sheep and goats to graze in one paddock, after which the animals can be moved to
another paddock.
Natural pasture and shrubs in PNG are often not very nutritious and may
contain anti-nutritive factors such as tannin types, which restrict rather than enhance
protein availability to the ruminant (Macfarlane, 2000). Signal grass, for example, may
cause hepatic dysfunctions in farm animals (Macfarlane, 2000). Low quality feed may
result in subsequent malnutrition, which may negatively affect the development of
acquired immunity against gastrointestinal parasites (Kyriazakis and Houdijk, 2006).
In the present study, however, significantly lower gastrointestinal parasite
prevalence at study sites, which had more frequent anthelmintic treatments, was not
observed. This could be due to anthelmintic resistance or treatments not being given
correctly, however, further studies are needed to confirm this.
The overall infection levels of gastrointestinal parasites in goats were higher
than in sheep. Goats were also infected with a wider spectrum of gastrointestinal
parasites. This contradicts some previous studies, which found a lower overall
prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in goats (Kanyari et al., 2009; Khan et al., 2010;
Abebe et al., 2011) but is in agreement with a number of other studies, which reported
a higher parasite prevalence in goats (Regassa et al., 2006; Nwosu et al., 2007; Gadahi
et al., 2009; Dagnachew et al., 2011). Goats do not develop resistance as efficiently as
sheep (Hoste et al., 2008) and this may explain the findings of the present study.
Trichostrongylid nematodes were the most abundant parasites detected in the
present study by microscopy. Quantitative PCR analyses revealed a higher prevalence
of H. contortus (41.1 - 41.7 %) compared to T. circumcincta (21.3 - 24.1 %) and
Trichostrongylus spp. (14 - 14.8 %) (Table 3-4). The results of this study were similar to
those found in a study in adult goats in Malaysia, which reported that H. contortus
prevalence ranged from 35 - 46 % and Trichostrongylus spp. from 14 - 21 %, although
in sheep, prevalence of H. contortus (35 – 68 %) and Trichostrongylus (39.6 %) were
Chapter 3 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
123
slightly higher (Dorny et al., 1995). Another study in Ethiopia also found higher
prevalences of H. contortus (56.3 %) and Trichostrongylus spp. (39.6 %) (Abebe et al.,
2011). The observed differences in prevalence between the present and previous
studies could be due to variations in geographical and climatic conditions. However,
the trends are similar, which is H. contortus occurring at a higher frequency than the
other trichostrongylid nematodes.
Haemonchus species are highly fecund, laying up to 5000 eggs per day, where
environmental factors are favourable (Gupta et al., 1987; Le Jambre, 2006). The pre-
parasitic stages of H. contortus develop and survive better at mean monthly maximum
temperatures ≥ 18.3 °C (Gupta et al., 1987). The study sites in the present study had
mean maximum annual temperatures that ranged from 18.9 °C to 31.1 °C, with only
little variation throughout the year due to their proximity to the equator. Additionally,
most study sites were very humid and therefore, likely to sustain the survival of the
free-living stages of H. contortus, leading to high pasture contamination. Free-living
stages of Teladorsagia and Trichostrongylus, however survive better at < 10 °C
(O'Connor et al., 2006). Thus, the fact that the prevalence of H. contortus was higher
than T. circumcincta and Trichostrongylus spp. is likely due to adult nematodes
releasing more eggs in their faeces and well as optimal environmental conditions in
favour of H. contortus development.
The overall prevalence of Eimeria for sheep was 17.3 % (19/110) by microscopy
(Table 3-1) and 64.9 % (35/57) by qPCR (Table 3-7). A previous study in PNG reported
that 89 % (67/75) of sheep were positive for Eimeria from three locations (in Erap and
Lae, Morobe Province and in Mt. Hagen, Western Highlands Province) (Varghese and
Yayabu, 1985). The low prevalence of Eimeria observed in the present study by
microscopy may be due to the different methodology used for parasite identification.
In the present study, a simple flotation procedure was used, while in previous studies,
a centrifugation/flotation method was used (Varghese and Yayabu, 1985). Methods
involving centrifugation are more sensitive than just faecal flotation techniques for
detection of oocytes in faecal samples (Dryden et al., 2005). The overall prevalence of
Eimeria in goats was higher by qPCR (91.1 %) (Table 3-7). Previous studies in other
Chapter 3 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
124
countries have also reported such high prevalences in goats (Kusilukaa et al., 1996;
Balicka-Ramisz, 1999). Furthermore, Eimeria zuernii was identified in two adult goats in
the present study. Eimeria zuernii is highly pathogenic in calves; causing diarrhoea
(Bangoura et al., 2012), enteric lesions and death of infected calves (Stockdale, 1977).
The smallholder goat farms where E. zuernii was found shared feeding grounds with
cattle and other animals. Whether the presence of E. zuernii identified herein
represents actual or mechanical infections remains to be determined, as the oocysts
may have been passing through rather than infecting these goats. Notwithstanding,
this is the first study to report Eimeria in goats in PNG. Adult sheep and goats shed
eimerid oocysts in their faeces, which could lead to contamination of pasture and
therefore they could be regarded as a source of infection for lambs and kids.
The EPG counts for Eimeria in PNG Priangan sheep (n = 27) were significantly
lower than that in the Highlands Halfbred sheep (n = 83). It is difficult to ascertain the
mechanisms behind the observed difference, especially as coincidentally, most PNG
Priangan sheep samples were collected in Labu, where anthelminthic drug treatment
was conducted more regularly. Nevertheless, previous studies have shown that some
indigenous sheep breeds exhibit higher levels of resistance against gastrointestinal
parasites and this might partially explain the present findings (Baker and Gray, 2004).
PNG Priangan sheep are native to tropical climates, as they originated from Southeast
Asia and have been exposed to gastrointestinal parasites in PNG for over a century
(Quartermain, 2004a). In contrast, Highlands Halfbred sheep, which are crossbreeds of
the PNG Priangan sheep and the temperate Corriedale and Perendale breeds have only
a fraction of this resistance and will therefore be more susceptible to infection. More
detailed studies on immunology and feeding behaviour of the different sheep breeds
are required to elucidate this problem further.
The trematode, Fasciola, was present in sheep and goats in research institutes
(Labu and Tambul), smallholder farm (Benabena), and the public institution (Baisu). A
previous study in PNG found Fasciola in the area of Aiyura (Eastern Highlands
province) and showed that the sheep there were exposed to continual (low-level)
pasture contamination leading to chronic fasciolosis at all times (Owen, 1989). In PNG,
Chapter 3 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
125
in all areas where the intermediate snail host, Lymnaea species, exists, acute
fasciolosis can occur in the wet season especially in areas where the land is not well-
drained and the grazing pressure is high (Owen, 1989).
This is the first study reporting the prevalence of the lungworm, Dictyocaulus,
in small ruminants in PNG. Some studies have found that goats are more susceptible to
Dictyocaulus than sheep (Sharma, 1994; Berrag and Urquhart, 1996; Alemu et al.,
2006). This study found a low prevalence (3.6 %) of Dictyocaulus in goats from Labu
(lowland) whereas, previous studies reported a high prevalence (12 – 60 %) (Alemu et
al., 2006). The observed difference between the present and previous studies could be
due to the life cycle stages of the parasite. In the prepatent or post-patent phases or
during hypobiosis, it is impossible to detect these parasites by faecal examinations
(Frasser, 1991).
3.5 Conclusions
In conclusion, the information collected in this study is an important update on
the presence of gastrointestinal parasites in sheep and goats in PNG. Future
investigations should include longitudinal studies and larger cohorts to further assess
parasite epidemiology in the diverse agro-climatic zones in the country. In addition,
further research is necessary to characterise the prevalence of various Eimeria species
in young lambs, goat kids and cattle to more fully understand the transmission
dynamics of Eimeria among ruminants in PNG.
Chapter 4
4. Molecular characterisation of
Cryptosporidium in sheep, goats and fish
from PNG
Chapter 4 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
The contents of in this chapter have been published as journal articles and they
can be found in Appendix C and D.
[1] Koinari M, Lymbery AJ and Ryan UM, 2014. Cryptosporidium in sheep and goats
from Papua New Guinea. Experimental Parasitology 141, 134-137.
[2] Koinari M., Karl S., Ng-Hublin J., Lymbery A.J. and Ryan U.M., 2013. Identification
of novel and zoonotic Cryptosporidium species in fish from Papua New Guinea.
Veterinary Parasitology 198, 1-9.
This chapter describes molecular screening and genotyping of Cryptosporidium
species and subtypes in sheep, goats and fish.
Research highlights:
The overall prevalences for Cryptosporidium was 2.2 % (6/276), 4.4 % (10/228),
1.14 % (7/614) in sheep, goats and fish, respectively, at the 18S rRNA locus.
In sheep, C. parvum (subtypes IIaA15G2R1 and IIaA19G4R1), C. andersoni and
C. scrofarum were identified.
In goats, C. hominis (subtype IdA15G1), C. parvum, C. xiaoi and rat genotype II
were identified.
In fish, C. hominis (subtype IdA15G1) and C. parvum (IIaA14G2R1, IIaA15G2R1
and IIaA19G4R1) and a novel genotype (which we have named,
Cryptosporidium sp. piscine genotype 8) were identified.
4.1 Introduction
Species of Cryptosporidium are globally distributed, zoonotic intestinal
protozoan parasites that cause diarrheal disease in animals and are one of the main
causes of serious diarrhoea in children (Kotloff et al., 2013). Clinical effects of
Cryptosporidium infection, which include diarrhoea, weight loss and often death in
lambs and goat kids, can severely impact the economy of sheep and goat farming (de
Graaf et al., 1999). In fish, Cryptosporidium can cause high morbidity with clinical signs
including variable levels of emaciation, poor growth rates, swollen coelomic cavities,
Chapter 4 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
129
anorexia, listlessness and increased mortality (Murphy et al., 2009). Further details on
Cryptosporidium are described in Chapter 1, Section 1.4.
Little is known of the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in humans,
domesticated animals or wildlife in PNG. Therefore, the aim of the present study was
to screen sheep, goats and fish for Cryptosporidium using molecular tools.
4.2 Methods
This section summarises the most important methods used to obtain the
results described in this chapter. A detailed description of all the methods is given in
Chapter 2 of this thesis. A schematic representation of methods used for molecular
detection is shown in Figure 4-1.
Figure 4-1: Flow chart of the methodology for molecular detection of Cryptosporidium spp. in the present study. DNA was extracted using commercial kits. Nested PCRs were performed and the amplified products were visualized on the gel. Amplification of the 18S rRNA, gp60 and actin loci produced approximately 298 bp, 400 bp and 278 bp products in length, respectively. The PCR products were sequenced and phylogenetic analyses were conducted.
Chapter 4 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
130
4.2.1 Sample collection
Faecal samples from a total of 276 sheep and 228 goats were collected from
February 2011 to April 2011 in a variety of agro-economic zones in PNG. The details of
the study sites, sheep and goats, and type of farms are described in Chapter 2, Sections
2.3 - 2.5.1.
A total of 614 fish from three different groups of fish; cultured freshwater
fingerlings (juveniles), wild freshwater and wild marine were collected between
February and August 2011. The species and numbers of fish are listed in Table 2-3
(Chapter 2, Section 2.5.2). On average, the time when fish were caught and at the stalls
before being sold was 2 h and the time lag between purchasing and processing the fish
was up to 4 h. The fish were weighed, measured (length and weight) and dissected.
Sections of intestine and stomach were cut using a fresh scalpel blade for each fish and
preserved in 70 % ethanol for molecular screening. The remaining stomach and
intestine were fixed in 10 % buffered formalin for histological analysis.
4.2.2 DNA isolation
Genomic DNA were extracted from 250 mg of faecal sample and fish tissue
scrapings using a PowerSoil® DNA isolation kit (MO BIO laboratories, Carlsbad, CA,
USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions and stored at -20 °C until screening. The
methods used are described in Chapter 2, Sections 2.8.1 and 2.8.3.
4.2.3 Cryptosporidium genotyping and subtyping
Identification of Cryptosporidium species and subtypes in faecal samples from
sheep and goats and from fish gut scrapings were performed using PCR and sequence
analyses of the 18S rRNA region, and gp60 and actin genes (Fig. 4-1). Details of the
molecular techniques used are described in Chapter 2, Sections 2.9.3. and 2.10 - 2.15.
After sequencing, the nucleotide sequences were analysed using FinchTV 1.4.0
(Geospiza, Inc., Seattle, WA, USA). Each sequence was entered into GenBank using
BLAST (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) to search for matching known sequences.
Sequences generated as part of the present study were aligned with 35 18S, 10 gp60
and 23 actin reference sequences representing selected Cryptosporidium species and
Chapter 4 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
131
genotypes available in GenBank. Sequences were aligned using both Clustal Omega
(http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/) and MUSCLE alignment (Edgar, 2004)
using MEGA5 software (Tamura et al., 2011) and the resultant alignments were
adjusted manually using the MEGA5 program.
Phylogenetic analyses were conducted in MEGA5 software (Tamura et al.,
2011) using neighbour joining (NJ), maximum parsimony (MP) and maximum likelihood
(ML) models for the 18S and actin loci only. Distance estimation was conducted using
MEGA5 (Tamura et al., 2011) based on evolutionary distances calculated using the p-
distance model (Nei and Zhang, 2006) and grouped using neighbour-joining.
Parsimony and maximum likelihood analyses were also conducted using the MEGA5
(Tamura et al., 2011). The MP trees were obtained using the close-neighbour-
interchange (CNI) algorithm (Nei and Kumar, 2000) with search level 3 in which the
initial trees were obtained with the random addition of sequences (1 replicate).
Evolutionary history was inferred using maximum likelihood. Reliabilities for the trees
were tested using 1000 bootstrap replications (Felsenstein, 1985) and bootstrap values
exceeding 70 were considered well supported (Hills and Bull, 1993).
4.2.4 GenBank nucleotide accession numbers
The partial 18S and gp60 nucleotide sequences for Cryptosporidium derived
from sheep and goats were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers
KJ584567 - KJ584584. The unique partial 18S rRNA and actin sequences of piscine
genotype 8 (from silver biddies) were deposited in GenBank under the accession
numbers KC807985 - KC807988.
4.2.5 Histological analysis
Sections of intestinal and stomach tissues of fish were fixed in 10 % formalin
and were embedded in paraffin. Histological sections were cut at 5 µm thicknesses,
stained with haematoxylin and eosin and examined with an Olympus BX50 light
microscope at 400 and 1000 fold magnifications.
Chapter 4 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
132
4.2.6 Analysis of prevalence
Prevalences (isolates positive at 18S locus) were expressed as a percentage of
positive samples with 95 % confidence intervals calculated assuming a binomial
distribution, using the software Quantitative Parasitology 3.0 (Rozsa et al., 2000).
4.3 Results
4.3.1 Prevalence of Cryptosporidium in sheep, goats and fish.
Cryptosporidium was detected in 2.2 % (6/276; 95 % CI 2.8 % – 6.2 %) of sheep,
4.4 % (10/228; 95 % CI = 2.8 % - 6.2 %) of goats and 1.14 % (7/614; 95 % CI 0.7 % - 1.6
%) of fish at the 18S rRNA locus. Among sheep, Cryptosporidium was detected in two
animals from research institutes, one from the government station and three from
smallholder flocks (Table 4-1). Among goats, Cryptosporidium was identified in four
animals from research institutional farms and six from smallholder farms (Table 4-1).
Of the seven positive isolates from fish, two (1.5 %, 95 % CI 0.4 % - 2.8 %) were
cultured fingerlings, one (0.5 %, 95 % CI 0.0 % - 1.1 %) was a wild freshwater species
and four (1.5 %, 95 % CI 0.7 % - 2.3 %) were wild marine species. The prevalence of
Cryptosporidium for specific species of fish in each study location is given in Table 4-2.
Table 4-1: Prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in different farm types in sheep and goats in the present study. N = the total number of faecal samples for sheep and goats. P = the prevalence, which is the number of animals, which were positive for Cryptosporidium at the 18S locus. Given in parentheses are the percent prevalence and 95 % confidence interval (CI).
Type of farms N P (%, 95 % CI)
Sheep
Research Institute 156 2 (1.28, 0.22-5.03)
Public Institute 26 0
Government 40 1 (2.5, 0.13-14.73)
Smallholder 54 3 (5.56, 1.45-16.35)
Total 276 6 (2.2, 0.8-4.9)
Goat
Research Institute 78 4 (5.13, 1.66-13.31)
Public Institute 39 0
Government 6 0
Smallholder 105 6 (5.71, 2.34-12.52)
Total 228 10 (2.25-8.16)
Chapter 4 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
133
Table 4-2: Prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in fish in the present study. N = the total number of fish sampled. P = the prevalence, which is the number of animals, which were positive for Cryptosporidium at the 18S locus. Given in parentheses are the percent prevalence and 95 % confidence interval (CI). Cultured = all fish were from freshwater fish-ponds.
Study locations Host Group N P (%, 95 % CI
Kundiawa Nile tilapia Cultured 36 1 (2.78, 0.15-16.21
Mumeng Nile tilapia Cultured 26 1 (3.85, 1.2-21.59)
Pagwi Silver barb Wild freshwater 39 1 (2.56, 0.13-15.07)
Bilbil Mackerel scads Wild marine 5 1 (20, 1.05-70.12)
Pilapila Mackerel scads Wild marine 24 1 (4.17, 0.22-23.12)
Tavana Silver biddy Wild marine 29 2 (6.9, 1.2-24.22)
4.3.2 Molecular characterisation of Cryptosporidium species identified
in sheep, goats and fish at the 18S, gp60 and actin locus
Based on comparison with 18S rRNA nucleotide sequences available in
GenBank database, three species of Cryptosporidium were detected in sheep, namely
C. parvum (n = 4), C. andersoni (n = 1) and C. scrofarum (n = 1). Four species/genotypes
were detected in goats; C. hominis (n = 6), C. parvum (n = 2), C. xiaoi (n = 1) and rat
genotype II (n = 1) (Table 4-3). Rat genotype II, C. xiaoi, C. scrofarum and C. andersoni
isolates were detected in animals from smallholder farms. The C. hominis isolates were
from smallholder (n = 4) and institutional (n = 2) farms, while C. parvum was identified
in animals from three types of farms; government (n = 1), institutional (n = 3) and
smallholder (n = 2). Analysis of the gp60 gene identified the presence of two C. parvum
subtypes; IIaA15G2R1 (n = 3) and IIaA19G4R1 (n = 2) in sheep and goats and a
C. hominis subtype (IdA15G1) (n = 1) in a goat (Table 4-3). The phylogenetic
relationship between sequences obtained from sheep and goats in the present study
and other Cryptosporidium species or genotypes is shown in Figure 4-2.
In fish, sequence analyses identified C. parvum (5 isolates: Nile tilapia ON36
and ON68, mackerel scad DM17 and DM18, and silver barb PG37) and a novel piscine
genotype (2 isolates: silver biddy GO18 and GO55), hereafter referred to as piscine
genotype 8 at the 18S rRNA locus (Table 4-4). At the gp60 locus, three subtypes
Chapter 4 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
134
belonging to C. parvum (IIaA14G2R1, IIaA15G2R1, IIaA19G4R1) and one subtype
belonging to C. hominis (IdA15G1) were identified (Table 4-4).
The two piscine genotype 8 isolates from silver biddies were genetically
identical to each other, but distinct from all isolates previously characterised at the 18S
rRNA locus. Analyses of the 18S rRNA nucleotide sequences revealed that piscine
genotype 8 is closely related to piscine genotype 3 from a sea mullet with 4.3 %
genetic difference (i.e. 95.4 % genetic similarity) (Table 4-5). Neighbour-joining,
parsimony and maximum likelihood analyses produced similar results and indicated
that piscine 8 genotype, clustered most closely with the piscine 3 genotype from a sea
mullet, while the other five isolates clustered with C. parvum (85 % bootstrap support)
(Fig. 4-3). Sequences were also obtained for the two piscine genotype 8 isolates at the
actin locus. At this locus, sequence information was only available for C. molnari and
piscine genotype 1 and piscine genotype 8 grouped more closely with C. molnari
genotypes (Fig. 4-4) with 7.3 % - 8.5 % genetic differences (91.5 % to 92.7 % genetic
similarities) (Table 4-5).
Table 4-3: Species and subtypes of Cryptosporidium identified in sheep and goats in the present study.
Sample Host Species identified at the 18S locus
Type of farm gp60 subtype
GE51 Goat C. hominis Smallholder _
GE53 Goat C. hominis Smallholder _
GE66 Goat C. hominis Smallholder _
GE78 Goat C. hominis Smallholder IdA15G1
GM14 Goat C. hominis Research Institution _
GW10 Goat C. hominis Research Institution _
GM35 Goat C. parvum Research Institution IIaA19G4R1
GW19 Goat C. parvum Research Institution IIaA15G2R1
SW29 Sheep C. parvum Research Institution _
SE03 Sheep C. parvum Government IIaA15G2R1
SE83 Sheep C. parvum Smallholder IIaA15G2R1
SW106 Sheep C. parvum Research Institution IIaA19G4R1
SE67 Sheep C. scrofarum Smallholder _
SE79 Sheep C. andersoni Smallholder _
GE102 Goat C. xiaoi Smallholder _
GE01 Goat Rat genotype II Smallholder _
Chapter 4 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
135
Table 4-4: Species, genotypes and subtypes of Cryptosporidium identified in fish in the present study. Sample DM18 was typed as C. parvum at the 18S locus but at gp60 locus it was typed as C. hominis (IdA15G1) indicating a mixture of C. parvum/C. hominis in this sample. Cultured = all fish were from freshwater fish-ponds.
Sample Host species Group 18S GP60 Actin
ON36 Nile tilapia Cultured C. parvum IIaA19G4R1 -
ON68 Nile tilapia Cultured C. parvum IIaA14G2R1 -
PG37 Silver barb Wild freshwater
C. parvum IIaA19G4R1 -
DM17 Mackerel scad Wild marine C. parvum IIaA15G2R1 -
DM18 Mackerel scad Wild marine C. parvum, IdA15G1 -
GO18 Silver biddy Wild marine Piscine genotype 8
- Piscine genotype 8
GO55 Silver biddy Wild marine Piscine genotype 8
- Piscine genotype 8
Table 4-5: Percentage genetic differences between piscine genotype 8 and other Cryptosporidium species/genotypes at the 18S rRNA and actin loci. * = Actin sequences were not available for these genotypes.
Species/subtypes 18S locus Actin locus
Piscine genotype 1 13.0 17.4
Piscine genotype 2 5.1 Not analysed*
Piscine genotype 3 4.3 Not analysed*
Piscine genotype 4 6.3 Not analysed*
Piscine genotype 5 5.5 Not analysed*
Piscine genotype 6 13.0 Not analysed*
Piscine genotype 7 11.8 Not analysed*
C. molnari 10.8 7.3-8.5
C. parvum 15.4 21.4
C. hominis 15.4 21.4
C. bovis 17.7 19.0
C. baileyi 14.7 19.4
C. muris 15.0 19.4
C. andersoni 13.8 20.1
4.3.3 Microscopy
No parasites were observed during microscopic examination of the intestinal or
stomach tissues due to substantial autolysis of tissues.
Chapter 4 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
136
Figure 4-2: Evolutionary relationships of Cryptosporidium isolates from sheep and goats inferred by neighbour-joining analysis of p distances calculated from pairwise comparison of 18S rRNA sequences. The percentage of replicate trees, in which associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown at the internal nodes (> 50 % only) for distance, parsimony and maximum likelihood approaches (n.s. = not supported). Accession numbers are given in parentheses. Isolates from the present study are marked with an asterisk (*).
Chapter 4 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
137
Figure 4-3: Evolutionary relationships of Cryptosporidium piscine-derived isolates inferred by neighbour-joining analysis of p distances calculated from pairwise comparison of 18S rRNA sequences. The percentage of replicate trees, in which associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown at the internal nodes (> 50 % only) for distance, ML and parsimony (n.s. = not supported). Accession numbers are
Chapter 4 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
138
given in parentheses. Isolates from the present study are marked with asterisk (*).
Figure 4-4: Phylogenetic relationships of Cryptosporidium isolates inferred by neighbor-joining analysis of the actin gene based on genetic distances calculated by the p distance model. The percentage of replicate trees, in which associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown at the internal nodes (> 50 % only) for distance, ML and parsimony (n.s. = not supported). Accession numbers are given in parentheses. Isolates from the present study are marked with asterisk (*).
Chapter 4 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
4.4 Discussion
Cryptosporidium in sheep and goats
This is first study to identify and molecularly characterise Cryptosporidium in
sheep and goats in PNG and analysis revealed a high diversity of Cryptosporidium
parasites within these animal populations. The only other previous study of
Cryptosporidium in PNG identified Cryptosporidium antibodies in 24 % of young
children from Goroka (Groves et al., 1994).
Although point prevalences were low for Cryptosporidium in the present study,
the true prevalence may be underestimated as only single faecal samples were
screened at one time point and intermittent shedding and seasonal variation are
common (O'Handley et al., 1999). In addition, only adult animals were screened and
prevalences are known to be much higher in younger animals (Santin et al., 2007).
Most importantly, the identification of Cryptosporidium in livestock warrants better
care of farm animals to avoid contamination and illness in vulnerable populations, as
Cryptosporidium spp. are known to cause diarrhoea and mortality in lambs and goat
kids (de Graaf et al., 1999; Quilez et al., 2008; Giles et al., 2009).
The three species (C. parvum, C. andersoni and C. scrofarum) identified in
sheep from the present study have also been reported in sheep in previous studies
(Ryan et al., 2005; Santin et al., 2007; Quilez et al., 2008; Giles et al., 2009). In addition,
C. andersoni is frequently reported in cattle and occasionally in humans, while
C. scrofarum is commonly identified in pigs (Xiao, 2010). Cryptosporidium ubiquitum is
a common species found in sheep in other countries (Ryan et al., 2005; Santin et al.,
2007; Yang et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2010b), however, it was not identified in the
present study.
Three species, C. hominis, C. parvum and C. xiaoi, detected in goats in the
present study have also been reported in goats in other studies (Goma et al., 2007;
Geurden et al., 2008b; Quilez et al., 2008; Giles et al., 2009; Diaz et al., 2010b;). For
example, molecular analyses confirmed infections with C. hominis and C. parvum in
diarrheic goat kids in the UK (Giles et al., 2009) and C. parvum in goats in Spain (Quilez
et al., 2008). Cryptosporidium xiaoi is commonly reported in sheep (Fayer and Santin,
Chapter 4 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
140
2009) and occasionally in goats (Diaz et al., 2010b). This is the first report of rat
genotype II in goats. Rat genotype II has been reported in house rats in China (Lv et al.,
2009) and in the Philippines (Ng-Hublin et al., 2013), brown rats in the Philippines (Ng-
Hublin et al., 2013), and in wild black rats in Northern Australia (Paparini et al., 2012).
The goat in which rat genotype II was identified was from a smallholder farm in
Benabena. Smallholders usually keep their goats in night houses, which are built very
close to their own homes in order to avoid theft. The goat could have acquired this
genotype from the house rats; however, further studies are required to confirm this
and to determine if the goat was actually infected or just passing oocysts from
ingestion of rat faeces. Identification of species such as C. andersoni, C. scrofarum and
C. xiaoi in smallholder flocks probably reflects the management system. Typically,
these small ruminants are tethered and/or allowed to graze freely on shrubs and
grasses along road sides, near homes and gardens, where they share the feeding
grounds with other livestock, especially cattle and pigs.
Cryptosporidium hominis and C. parvum are the most common causes of
cryptosporidiosis in humans worldwide (Xiao, 2010). In the present study, C. hominis
(subtype IdA15G1) was found in goats and C. parvum (subtypes IIaA15G2R1 and
IIaA19G4R1) was found in both sheep and goats. The C. parvum subtype, IIaA15G2R1,
has been reported in sheep and goats in previous studies in Belgium, Spain, Brazil,
China and Australia (Geurden et al., 2008b; Diaz et al., 2010a; Paz et al., 2014; Yang et
al., 2014a; Ye et al., 2014). The C. parvum subtype, IIaA15G2R1, is a common subtype
in cattle and humans ( Xiao, 2010; Feng et al., 2013) in the Americas, Europe, Northern
Africa and Asia (Quilez et al., 2008; Santin et al., 2008; Soba and Logar, 2008; Brook et
al., 2009; Geurden et al., 2009; Amer et al., 2010; Diaz et al., 2010a; Meireles et al.,
2011; Iqbal et al., 2012; Alyousefi et al., 2013; Helmy et al., 2013; Rahmouni et al.,
2014; Rieux et al., 2013). It has also been found in yaks in China (Mi et al., 2013) and in
buffalo in Egypt (Helmy et al., 2013). The C. parvum subtype, IIaA19G4R1, was
identified in both a goat and a sheep in the present study. Previously, C. parvum
subtype IIaA19G4R1 was identified in cattle in Northern Ireland (Thompson et al.,
2007) and Australia (Ng et al., 2008).
Chapter 4 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
141
Cryptosporidium in fish
In fish, the overall prevalence of Cryptosporidium sp. was low (1.14 %, 7/614).
Previous studies have also reported low prevalences in similar groups of fish (0.8 %,
6/709) (Reid et al., 2010) and in ornamental fish (3.5 %, 6/171) (Morine et al., 2012),
while others have reported higher prevalences (10 - 100 %) mostly among juvenile fish
(Alvarez-Pellitero et al., 2004; Sitja-Bobadilla et al., 2005; Murphy et al., 2009; Zanguee
et al., 2010).
The present study identified three new fish hosts for Cryptosporidium; silver
barb (P. gonionotus), mackerel scad (D. macarellus) and oblong silver biddy
(G. oblongus). The fourth host Nile tilapia (O. niloticus) could also be a new host since
previous studies have detected Cryptosporidium in the same genus but did not
identified the species (Landsberg and Paperna, 1986; Paperna and Vilenkin, 1996).
No oocysts or life cycle stages were observed in the infected fish hosts in the
present study due to substantial autolysis of tissues, which has been reported as an
issue for Cryptosporidium detection in piscine hosts (Zanguee et al., 2010). Fish are
known to have a very rapid rate of tissue autolysis compared to homeotherms
(Roberts, 2012) and many of the fish were dead for up to 4 hours prior to being
processed, which contributed to the problem. Previous studies have provided
histological and electron microscopic evidence of considerable cellular damage
associated with several Cryptosporidium species/genotypes that infect fish; C. molnari
in the stomach of fingerlings and juveniles of gilt-head sea bream (Alvarez-Pellitero
and Sitja-Bobadilla, 2002), piscine genotype 1 in the stomach of a guppy (Ryan et al.,
2004) and piscine genotype 3 in the intestine of a mullet (Reid et al., 2010). Piscine
genotype 2 was associated with gastric infections in angelfish, with the greatest
morbidity and mortality seen in larval and juvenile fish (Murphy et al., 2009). Whether
the C. parvum and C. hominis identified in the present study represents actual or
mechanical infections remains to be determined as the oocysts may have been passing
through rather than infecting these fish and further research using histological analysis
of rapidly preserved tissue specimen is required to confirm this.
Chapter 4 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
142
The zoonotic Cryptosporidium genotypes identified in this study are of
significance to public health. Cryptosporidium parvum subtypes IIaA14G2R1,
IIaA15G2R1 and IIaA19G4R1 were found in cultured freshwater (Nile tilapia), wild
freshwater (silver barb) and a marine (mackerel scad) fish. The zoonotic C. parvum IIa
subtype family has predominantly been found in calves and in humans in North
America, Europe and Australia (Xiao, 2010). Only one study has previously detected
zoonotic C. parvum (subtype IIaA18G3R1) in a marine fish (Reid et al., 2010). The
presence of IIa subtypes in the fish samples from the present study could be due to
waterborne contamination with human and animal wastes. Human sewage
management systems in PNG villages typically involve dugout toilets near the homes
and toilets built over the rivers or seas. No cattle farms were seen in close vicinity to
where the samples were collected, whereas dugout toilets, companion animals and/or
domesticated poultry and pigs were seen in the environment. Fish-ponds, rivers and
seas could be contaminated from rainwater runoff and from humans and/or animals
bathing in them. A previous study has detected antibodies against Cryptosporidium
among children from PNG (Groves et al., 1994), however, no molecular work has been
done to confirm the species or genotypes present.
One marine fish (mackerel scad DM18) was identified as C. parvum at the 18S
locus, while at the gp60 locus it was subtyped as C. hominis IdA15G1R1, indicating that
a mixed C. parvum/C. hominis infection was present. This is the first report of
C. hominis in fish. The only other marine organism, in which C. hominis has been
reported was a dugong (Dugong dugon) (Morgan et al., 2000), and its presence
probably reflects human sewage contamination of the water.
The novel piscine genotype 8 was identified in two marine silver biddies. At the
18S locus, piscine genotype 8 exhibited 4.3 % genetic difference with piscine genotype
3 and 13.8 % - 17.7 % genetic difference with other Cryptosporidium spp. (Table 4-5).
At the actin locus, piscine genotype 8 exhibited 7.3 % genetic difference with
C. molnari 2 and 19.0 % - 21.4 % with other Cryptosporidium spp. (Table 4-5). Based on
the differences in the genetic sequences, piscine genotype 8 is unique and may
represent a new species; however, further research is required to confirm this.
Chapter 4 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
143
4.5 Conclusions
These findings suggest that sheep and goats may be important reservoirs of
C. hominis and zoonotic C. parvum subtypes in PNG. The detection of C. hominis in
goats presumably reflects the very close association between humans and goats.
Further research is necessary to characterise the prevalence of various
Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in young lambs, goats and cattle and other
hosts such as humans to more fully understand the transmission dynamics of
Cryptosporidium in PNG.
The present study identified zoonotic C. parvum subtypes in fish species, which
are frequently eaten in PNG. Previous studies have not identified conclusive evidence
for transmission of Cryptosporidium from fish to humans but one study reported that
urban anglers are at a risk for contracting cryptosporidiosis from exposures received,
while fishing and consuming caught fish (the mean probability of infection was nearly
one) (Roberts et al., 2007). It is therefore essential that fish for human consumption
are handled appropriately to avoid contamination. In addition, a novel
Cryptosporidium sp. (piscine genotype 8) was identified based on molecular data but
lacks histological details of infection or morphological features of the oocysts, thus
future work is required to establish this genotype as a species.
Chapter 5
5. Prevalence of Giardia duodenalis in sheep,
goats and fish from PNG by quantitative
PCR
Chapter 5 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
This chapter describes work conducted using a qPCR assay to screen for Giardia
duodenalis in sheep, goats and fish from PNG.
Research highlights:
The overall prevalence for G. duodenalis in sheep, goats and fish were 9.1 %
(25/276), 12.3 % (28/228) and 7 % (19/272), respectively.
Giardia duodenalis was found in sheep and goats in all farm types and in fish in
all three groups (cultured freshwater, wild freshwater and wild marine).
5.1 Introduction
Giardiasis is a re-emerging infectious disease of worldwide significance caused
by Giardia duodenalis (Thompson, 2000). Giardia-induced diarrhoea is common in
sheep and goats. It can cause significant economic loss to farmers (O'Handley et al.,
2001; Aloisio et al., 2006). See further details on Giardia in Chapter 1, Section 1.5.
Little is known about Giardia infections in fish. A recent study in Australia
identified a low prevalence of Giardia (3.8 % - 27/709) in fish hosts (Yang et al., 2010)
with G. microti and both zoonotic (A and B) and non-zoonotic (E) assemblages of
G. duodenalis detected. Whether the fish in the latter study were truly infected with
those Giardia species or simply served as mechanical vectors for the dissemination of
waterborne Giardia cysts is unclear (Feng and Xiao, 2011). Another study, in Egypt,
identified G. duodenalis (assemblage A) in farmed and wild freshwater fish host with a
prevalence of 3.3 % (Ghoneim et al., 2011).
Giardia duodenalis is common in sheep and goats, but there are no records of
infection or prevalence in these animals or other animals in PNG (Owen, 2005).
Infections in humans with G. duodenalis have been reported in several surveys in the
country (Owen, 2005). However, the importance of G. duodenalis as the causative
agent of diarrhoea in PNG has not been assessed. As little is known of the prevalence
of Giardia spp. in humans, domesticated animals or wildlife in PNG, the aim of the
present study was to screen sheep, goats and fish for G. duodenalis using molecular
tools.
Chapter 5 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
147
5.2 Methods
This section summarises the most important methods used to obtain the
results described in this chapter. A detailed description of all the methods is described
in Chapter 2 of this thesis.
5.2.1 Sample collection
Samples were collected from sheep, goats and fish in various locations in PNG
from February 2011 to August 2011. Further details of sampling are described in
Chapter 2, Sections 2.1 - 2.6.
5.2.2 DNA isolation and qPCR amplification
Genomic DNA were extracted from 250 mg of faecal sample and fish tissue
scrapings using a PowerSoil® DNA isolation kit (MO BIO laboratories, Carlsbad, CA,
USA) as described in Chapter 2, Sections 2.8.1 and 2.8.3.
All samples were screened for the presence of G. duodenalis at the glutamate
dehydrogenase (gdh) locus using a qPCR assay as previously described (Yang et al.,
2014b). The details of this assay are described in Chapter 2, Section 2.9.4.
5.2.3 Data analysis
Prevalences (samples which were positive for G. duodenalis at the gdh locus)
were expressed as a percentage of positive samples; with 95 % confidence intervals
calculated assuming a binomial distribution, using the software Quantitative
Parasitology 3.0 (Rozsa et al., 2000). Differences in prevalence among groups were
compared by Fisher’s exact test (FET) (for two groups) or chi-square analysis (for more
than two groups). Where multiple pairwise comparisons were made among groups, a
Bonferroni correction was applied to maintain an experiment-wide Type I error rate of
5 %.
5.3 Results
The overall prevalence of G. duodenalis was 9.1 % (25/256) in sheep, 12.3 %
(28/228) in goats and 7 % (19/272) in fish. For each farm type, the prevalence for
sheep ranged from 5 – 12.2 % and for goats from 8.6 – 66.7 % (Table 5-1). There was
no significant difference in prevalence between sheep and goats (FET: p = 0.2474).
Chapter 5 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
148
There were no significant differences in prevalence of Giardia in sheep between farm
types (FET: p > 0.005) (Table 5-2). There were, however, differences in prevalence of
Giardia in goats between farms (Table 5-2). Specifically, the prevalence of
G. duodenalis in goats was higher in Menifo compared to Labu, Tambul and Baisu (p
values < 0.005).
In the three groups of fish, the prevalence was 4.1 % (5/121) in cultured
freshwater fish, 7.7 % (1/13) in wild freshwater fish and 9.4 % (13/138) in wild marine
fish (Table 5-3). There were no significant difference in the prevalences between the
fish groups (Chi-square: p values where larger than 0.05). Giardia duodenalis was
identified in eight fish species; Nile tilapia (n = 4), common carp (n = 1), Java carp
(n = 1), mackerel scad (n = 2), rainbow runner (n = 2), big eye scad (n = 4), reef
needlefish (n = 3) and oriental bonito (n = 4) (Table 5-4).
Table 5-1: Prevalence of G. duodenalis in sheep and goats in different farm types in the present study. N = the total number of faecal samples for sheep and goats. P = the number of animals, which were positive for Giardia. Given in parentheses are percent prevalence and 95 % confidence interval (CI).
Type of farm N P (%, 95 % CI)
Sheep
Lowland research institute (Labu) 40 2 (5, 0.9 - 18.2)
Highland research institute (Tambul) 115 14 (12.2, 7.1 - 19.9)
Public institute (Baisu) 27 2 (7.4, 1.3 - 25.8)
Government (Menifo) 40 2 (5, 0.9 - 18.2)
Smallholder 54 5 (9.3, 3.5 - 21.1)
Total 276 25 (9.1, 6.1 - 13.2)
Goats
Lowland research institute (Labu) 43 4 (9.3, 3.0 - 23.1)
Highland research institute (Tambul) 35 3 (8.6, 2.2 - 24.2)
Public institute (Baisu) 39 5 (12.8, 4.8 - 28.2)
Government (Menifo) 6 4 (66.7, 24.1 - 94.0)
Smallholder 105 12 (11.4, 6.3 - 19.5)
Total 228 28 (12.3, 8.5 - 17.4)
Chapter 5 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
149
Table 5-2: Comparisons of prevalences for G. duodenalis in sheep and goats between farm types. All pairs of farms were compared by FET. A Bonferroni correction was used to determine significance at p values < 0.005. * = values are significantly different between farm types by FET. RI = research institute, PI = public institute.
Data sets Sheep Goats
p values p values
Lowland RI (Labu) vs Highland RI (Tambul) 0.3619 1.0000
Lowland RI (Labu) vs PI (Baisu) 1.0000 0.7298
Lowland RI (Labu) vs Government (Menifo) 1.0000 0.0043*
Lowland RI (Labu) vs Smallholder 0.6947 1.0000
Highland RI (Tambul) vs PI (Baisu) 0.7385 0.7143
Highland RI (Tambul) vs Government (Menifo) 0.3619 0.0045*
Highland RI (Tambul) vs Smallholder 1.0000 0.7614
PI (Baisu) vs Government (Menifo) 1.0000 0.0103
PI (Baisu) vs Smallholder 1.0000 0.0103
Government (Menifo) vs Smallholder 0.6947 0.0038*
Table 5-3: Prevalence of G. duodenalis in fish from the three groups of aquatic environments in the present study.N = the total number of fish samples. P = the number of animals, which were positive for Giardia. Given in parentheses are percent prevalences and 95 % confidence intervals (CI).
Group N P (%, 95 % CI)
Cultured freshwater 121 5 (4.1, 1.5 - 9.6)
Wild freshwater 13 1 (7.7, 0.4 – 37.9)
Wild marine 138 13 (9.4, 5.3 – 15.9)
Total 272 19 (7.0, 4.4 – 10.9)
Table 5-4: Prevalence of G. duodenalis in different fish hosts in the present study. N = the total number of fish samples. P = the number of animals, which were positive for Giardia. Given in parentheses are percent prevalences and 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Cultured = fish from freshwater fish ponds/farms.
Fish group Scientific name Common name N P (%, 95 % CI)
Cultured Oreochromis niloticus Nile tilapia 80 4 (5, 1.3 - 13)
Cultured Cyprinus carpio Common carp 41 1 (2.4, 0.13 - 14.4)
Wild freshwater Puntius gonionotus Java carp 13 1 (7.7, 0.4 - 37.9)
Marine Decapterus macarellus Mackerel scad 27 2 (7.4, 1.3 - 25.8)
Marine Elagatis bipinnulatus Rainbow runner 5 2 (40, 7.3 - 83)
Marine Selar crumenophthalmus Bigeye scad 77 4 (5.2, 1.7 - 13.5)
Marine Strongylura incisa Reef needlefish 4 3 (75, 21.9 - 98.7)
Marine Sarda orientalis Oriental bonito 4 2 (50, 9.2 - 90.8)
Total 251 19 (7.6, 4.7 - 11.8)
Chapter 5 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
150
5.4 Discussion
This is the first study to identify Giardia spp. in sheep, goats and fish from PNG.
In the present study, G. duodenalis was found in adult sheep in all types of farming
environments, giving an overall prevalence of 9.1 % (25/276). This prevalence rate is
higher than a previous study in Italy, which detected a prevalence of 1.5 % (5/325) in
sheep using nested PCRs targeting the gdh and beta-giardin gene (Giangaspero et al.,
2005), but its lower than most other studies investigating G. duodenalis in post-
weaned/adult sheep. In those studies, the prevalences were 44 % (220/500) in
Australia (Ryan et al., 2005), 37.5 % (12/32) in the US (Santin et al., 2007) and 19.2 %
(86/446) in Spain (Castro-Hermida et al., 2007). The first two of these studies were
based on PCR analyses, while the latter study used immunofluorescent antibody tests.
The prevalence of G. duodenalis in adult goats in the present study was 12.3 %
(28/228) by qPCR analysis of the gdh gene. This rate falls in the range of reported
prevalences for G. duodenalis in adult goats in other countries. For example, in
Malaysia, a low prevalence (6.8 %, 21/310) of Giardia was found in goats (≥ 3 years of
age) using nested PCR of the 18S locus (Lim et al., 2013), while in Spain, it was 19.8 %
(23/116) in healthy adult goats using immunofluorescent antibody tests (Castro-
Hermida et al., 2007). However, a similar prevalence (14.3 % - 15/105) has also been
reported in goat kids (< 12 months old) in Brazil (Bomfim et al., 2005). Generally, high
prevalences of G. duodenalis have been reported in young goats (< 10 months old). For
example, in Spain, 42.6 % (133/315) were positive using molecular tools targeting the
beta-giardin and tpi genes (Ruiz et al., 2008) and in Belgium, 35.5 % (53/148) were
positive using immunofluorescent antibody tests (Geurden et al., 2008b).
Although the present finding showed that the prevalence of G. duodenalis in
goats was higher in Menifo as compared to the institutional farms, this may not be a
very accurate estimate as the total number of goats from Menifo, which were
screened for Giardia was small (n = 6).
The prevalence of G. duodenalis was low (7 %, 19/272) in fish in the present
study (Table 5-3). These results complement previous findings on overall low
Chapter 5 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
151
prevalences of Giardia spp. in fish in Australia (3.8 %, 27/709) and Egypt (3.3 %, 3/92)
(Yang et al., 2010; Ghoneim et al., 2011). In Australia, G. duodenalis cysts and
trophozoites were detected in tissue sections of ten fish isolates including a marine
fish (sea mullet), cultured fingerlings (barramundi, black bream and mulloway) and a
freshwater fish (mulloway) (Yang et al., 2010). Whether the G. duodenalis identified in
the present study represents actual or mechanical infections remains to be
determined; the cysts may have been passing through rather than infecting these fish
and further research using histological analysis of rapidly preserved tissue specimens is
required to confirm this.
The present study identified G. duodenalis in seven new fish hosts including
common carp, Java carp, mackerel scad, rainbow runner, big eye scad, reef needlefish
and oriental bonito. The prevalence of G. duodenalis in Nile tilapia was 5 % (4/80),
which is similar to that reported in Egypt (4.2 %) (Ghoneim et al., 2011).
The low prevalence of Giardia detected in the present study could be due to
low levels of Giardia infections at the time of sampling. The sensitivity and specificity
of the qPCR assay used in this study have been evaluated by Yang et al. (2014b) and its
detection limit was 1 Giardia cyst per μL of faecal DNA extract. PCR is sometimes
hindered by inhibitors in stool specimens, including bile acids, bilirubins, haem and
complex carbohydrates (Wilson, 1997). However, in the present study, internal
amplification controls (IACs), as described previously (Yang et al., 2013), were included
in all the qPCR reactions to monitor faecal inhibition (see Chapter 2, Section 2.9.1).
5.5 Conclusions
Although the present study found low prevalences for G. duodenalis in adult
small ruminants and fish, these animals can be considered as sources of contamination
for susceptible hosts in PNG. Even low numbers (as low as ten) of Giardia cysts may
lead to an infection in humans (Rendtorff, 1979). Furthermore, Giardia cysts are
immediately infectious upon excretion and also are resistant and able to survive for
several weeks in the environment, resulting in a gradual increase in environmental
infection pressure (Geurden et al., 2010b). Previous studies have shown that
Chapter 5 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
152
G. duodenalis assemblage E (livestock genotype) is more prevalent in sheep and goats
than the zoonotic assemblages A and B (Geurden et al., 2010b), whereas a high
prevalence of zoonotic assemblages (A and B) have been reported in fish (Yang et al.,
2010; Ghoneim et al., 2011). In the present study, despite numerous attempts, it was
not possible to genotype the Giardia positives identified. Future studies are required
to genotype Giardia species and assemblages (genotypes) in these hosts and other
hosts including humans to fully understand the transmission dynamics of Giardia in
PNG.
Chapter 6
6. Morphological and molecular
characterisation of Anisakis species in fish
from PNG
Chapter 6 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
The contents of this chapter have been published in the journal of Veterinary
Parasitology. The article is listed below and it can be found in Appendix E.
Koinari, M., Karl, S., Elliot, A., Ryan, U., Lymbery, A.J., 2013. Identification of Anisakis
species (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in marine fish hosts from Papua New Guinea.
Veterinary Parasitology 193, 126-133.
The chapter describes morphological and molecular analyses of anisakid
nematodes from wild marine fish from PNG.
Research highlights:
This study identified only one species from the genus Anisakis, Anisakis typica,
and the overall prevalence was 7.6 %.
Anisakis typica was found in seven species of fish including Decapterus
macarellus, Gerres oblongus, Pinjalo lewisi, Pinjalo pinjalo, Selar
crumenophthalmus, Scomberomorus maculatus and Thunnus albacares (these
are new hosts for A. typica).
6.1 Introduction
The family Anisakidae includes parasitic nematodes of marine fauna. They have
a worldwide distribution and a complex life cycle, which involves invertebrates, fish,
cephalopods and mammals (Chai et al., 2005). Further details on anisakids are
described in Chapter 1, Section 1-6. Anisakid nematodes can accidentally infect
humans who can suffer from several symptoms including sudden epigastric pain,
nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and allergic reaction (Sakanari and McKerrow, 1989;
Audicana and Kennedy, 2008). Most cases of human infection involve anisakid species
belonging to the genus Anisakis. There are nine described species of Anisakis, which
are further subdivided into two types (Fig. 6-1) (Mattiucci and Nascetti, 2008;
Mattiucci et al., 2009). Of these, only A. simplex s.s, A. pegreffii and A. physeteris have
been shown to cause infection in humans (Mattiucci et al., 2011; Arizono et al., 2012).
Chapter 6 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
155
Figure 6-1: Type 1 and Type II Anisakis species belonging to the genus Anisakis.
Anisakid nematodes can be differentiated based on their morphological
characteristics and molecular data (Fig. 6-2). Larval morphological features including
the absence or presence of a ventricular appendage and an intestinal caecum are
useful for distinction between several anisakid genera (Shamsi and Butcher, 2011).
Anisakis Type I or Type II larvae can be identified based on ventriculus length and the
presence of a tail spine (or mucron) (Berland, 1961; Cannon, 1977). More recently,
PCR-based tools have been widely used for characterisation of anisakid species at
multiple loci as discussed in Chapter 1, Section 1-6.
Anisakid nematodes are a major public health concern. In the last thirty years,
there has been a marked increase in the prevalence of anisakidosis throughout the
world, due in part to growing consumption of raw or lightly cooked seafood (Lymbery
and Cheah, 2007; Audicana and Kennedy, 2008) . The highest number of cases (> 90 %)
come from Japan (with up to 1, 000 cases per year) due to consumption of raw fish
dishes such as sushi and sashimi (Oshima, 1972; Sugimachi et al., 1985). Most of the
rest of the cases are from other countries with a tradition of eating raw or marinated
fish, which include the Netherlands, France, Spain, Chile and the Philippines (Chai et
al., 2005; Choi et al., 2009). Anisakidosis is caused most commonly by Anisakis simplex
and Pseudoterranova decipiens (Table 6-1) (Hochberg and Hamer, 2010).
Fish are important sources of food and income for the majority of people living
in the mainland coastal areas as well as islands in PNG. Little is known about the
prevalence of zoonotic animal parasites such as anisakids in fish or of anisakidosis in
humans in PNG. A review paper mentioned A. simplex in skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus
Anisakis Type II larvae
• A. paggiae • A. physeteris* • A. brevispiculata
Anisakis Type I larvae
• Anisakis simplex s.s* • A. pegriffi* • A. simplex C • A. typica • A. ziphidarum • A. nascettii
Genus: Anisakis
*Zoonotic species
Chapter 6 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
156
pelamis) in waters on the south coast of PNG, but did not provide any supporting
information (Owen, 2005). The present study was aimed at investigating the
distribution of anisakid species and specifically to screen for zoonotic species of
anisakids obtained in fish from PNG, using both morphology and molecular analyses.
Figure 6-2: Schematic representation of diagnostic features for differentiating anisakids.Anisakis sp. Type I larvae: the posterior end with a micron (see arrow)
(Image from Cannon, 1977).
Table 6-1: Common zoonotic anisakids-geographic distribution, hosts, common food dishes and diseases. Host species 1 = primary host species. Host species 2 = predominant second intermediate host species.
Nematode Geographic distribution
Host species 1
Host species 2
Common food dishes
Form of anisakidosis
Anisakis simplex Japan, Northern Europe, US, Korea
Dolphins, porpoises, whales
Pacific salmon, herring, anchovies, scad, hake, mackerel
Sushi, sashimi, salted or smoked herring, gravlax, borquerones. Hawaiian lomi-lomi, ceviche
Gastrointestinal, ectopic, allergy
Pseudoterranova decipiens
US, Canada Seals, walruses, sea lions
cod Ceviche, cod Oropharyngeal
Chapter 6 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
157
6.2 Methods
This section summarises the most important methods used to obtain the
results described in this chapter. A detailed description of all the methods can be
found in Chapter 2 of this thesis. An overview schematic representation of methods
used for sample collection and screening of anisakid nematodes in this study is shown
in figure 6-3.
6.2.1 Parasite collection
A total of 276 whole fresh fish were collected from markets in the coastal
towns of Madang (specific study sites: Bilbil and Madang) and Rabaul (specific study
sites: Pilapila and Tavana) from March to August 2011 (see Chapter 2, Sections 2.3 and
2.5). The fish were necropsied and nematodes were collected from the body cavities.
The muscles of the fish were thinly sliced and investigated under white light to check
for nematode larvae. Nematodes were preserved in 70 % ethanol and transported to
Murdoch University, Australia, for analysis.
6.2.2 Morphological analysis
Whole nematodes were cleared in lactophenol for more than 48 h, individually
mounted onto microscope slides and viewed under an Olympus BX50 light microscope
equipped with Olympus DP70 Camera at 40/100x magnification. The following features
were measured: body width, oesophagus length, ventriculus length and mucron
length. Morphological identification was conducted according to keys previously
reported (Berland, 1961; Cannon, 1977; Shamsi et al., 2009a, b). Scanning electron
micrographs (SEMs) were taken for representative specimens to study further
morphological details using a Phillips XL30 scanning electron microscope. Specific
details of specimen preparations are described in Chapter 2, Section 2.7.2.
Chapter 6 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
158
Figure 6-3: Overview of the methods for collection and screening of anisakid nematodes in the present study. Nematodes were obtained from within the body cavities or muscle of marine fish and identified by light microscopy based on published keys and confirmed using scanning electron microscopy. Nematodes were then screened by PCR analyses of the ITS and cox2 gene. PCR products were sequenced and phylogenetic analyses were conducted.
6.2.3 Genetic characterisation and phylogenetic analysis
DNA from individual nematodes was isolated using a Qiagen DNeasy® blood
and tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) as described in Chapter 2, Section 2.8.2.
The ITS rRNA region was amplified using primers NC5 and NC2 (Zhu et al.,
1998). The mitochondrial DNA cytochrome oxidase II (mt-DNA cox2) gene was
Chapter 6 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
159
amplified using primers 210 and 211 (Nadler and Hudspeth, 2000). PCR assays were
performed as previously described (Kijewska et al., 2009a; Valentini et al., 2006). The
specific details of the PCR assays are described in Chapter 2, Section 2.9.5.
All PCR products were purified using an Ultra Clean® DNA purification kit
(MolBio, West Carlsbad, CA, USA). Sequencing was performed using the ABI Prism
BigDye® terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) on
an Applied Biosystems 3730 DNA Analyser instrument according to manufacturer’s
instructions except that the annealing temperature was lowered to 46 °C for the cox2
locus. Nucleotide sequences obtained were analysed using FinchTV 1.4.0 (Geospiza,
Inc.; Seattle, WA, USA; http://www.geospiza.com) and compared with published
sequences for identification in the GenBank database using BLAST
(http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) for species identification. (Further details of the
molecular techniques used for DNA processing are described in Chapter 2, Sections
2.10 - 2.15).
Before phylogenetic analysis, sequences were aligned with 9 ITS and 9 cox2
reference sequences, representing selected Anisakis species obtained from GenBank.
The nucleotide sequences were aligned using MUSCLE (Edgar, 2004), edited manually
and tested with MEGA5 model test to find the best DNA model to infer the
phylogenetic trees using the MEGA5 software (Tamura et al., 2011). Phylogenetic
analyses with other known anisakid species were conducted using both neighbour-
joining (NJ) and maximum-likelihood (ML) analyses for both loci. Evolutionary
relationships were calculated using the Kimura two-parameter model for ITS
sequences and the Tamura-Nei model for cox2 sequences with Contracaecum
osculatum as an outgroup. Reliabilities for both NJ and ML trees were tested using
1000 bootstrap replications (Felsenstein, 1985) and bootstrap values exceeding 70
were considered well supported (Hills and Bull, 1993). The nucleotide sequences were
deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers: JX648312 - JX648326.
Chapter 6 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
160
6.3 Results
6.3.1 Prevalence of Anisakis spp.
The overall prevalence of anisakids in fish from PNG (based on ITS PCR
positives) was 7.6 % (21/276, 95 % CI = 4.9 - 11.6). Anisakid larvae were found in 7 fish
species, at prevalences ranging from 2.9 - 100 % (Table 6-2). The larvae were observed
mostly within the body cavities of the fish and intensity ranged from 1 to 6 per
infected fish host with the exception of Pinjalo pinjalo, which had an intensity of 120
larvae per fish, with larvae being found in many other body parts including muscles,
pyloric region and liver.
Table 6-2: Prevalence of anisakid larvae in different fish hosts in the present study as determined by PCR. N = the number of fish sampled. P = the number of fish, which had anisakid nematodes. Given in parentheses are the percent prevalences and 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Mean intensity (MI) is the mean number of larvae in the infected fish hosts ± SD (range). Where no SD value was given, there were only one or few positive observations and SD could not be calculated.
Fish host N P (% P, 95 % CI) MI ± SD (min-max)
Specimen code
Decapterus macarellus (mackerel scad)
29 2 (6.9, 1.2 - 24.2) 1 DM23, DM24
Gerres oblongus (silver biddy) 54 2 (3.7, 0.6 - 13.8) 3 ± 0.4 (2 - 4) GO14, GO15
Pinjalo lewisi (slender pinjalo) 14 7 (50, 24 - 76) 5 ± 0.92 (1 - 6) PL1-PL5, PL8, PL9
Pinjalo pinjalo (pinjalo snapper)
1 1 (100, 5.5 - 100) 120 PP1
Scomberomorus maculatus (Spanish mackerel)
3 1 (33.3, 1.8 - 87.5) 1 SM3
Thunnus albacares (yellow-fin tuna)
34 1 (2.9, 0.2 - 17.1) 3 TA3
Selar crumenophthalmus (big eye scad)
106
7 (6.7, 2.9 - 13.6) 2.9 ± 0.95 (1 - 3) SC76 - SC78, SC88, SC97, SC100, SC102
6.3.2 Morphology of Anisakis Type I larvae
Morphological analysis showed that all anisakid nematodes examined were
Anisakis Type I larvae. The larvae were white and cylindrical in shape. They measured
between 20 - 36 mm in length and 0.4 - 0.45 mm in width. SEM revealed that the
cuticles were irregularly striated transversely at 5.5 µm intervals. The larvae had
inconspicuous lips with six papillae, a prominent boring tooth and excretory pore,
Chapter 6 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
161
which opened ventrally at the cephalic end (Fig. 6-4, panels A and E). The mouth
opening led to a cylindrical striated oesophagus (length 1.6 - 2.1 mm), which was
followed by a slightly wider ventriculus (length 0.98 - 1.13 mm). The junction between
oesophagus and ventriculus was transverse (Fig. 6-4 panel B). The ventriculus
connected obliquely with the intestine, without a ventricular appendage and intestinal
caecum (Fig. 6-4 panel C). The intestine filled the remaining part of the body. The
mucron was distinct and was located at the caudal end (length 17.5 - 18.0 µm) (Fig. 6-4
panels D, F and G).
Figure 6-4: Anisakis Type I larvae from Selar crumenophthalmus. These images are exemplary for all larvae found in the present study. Light microscopy images: A. Cephalic end of larva showing the boring tooth and the excretory pore; B. ventriculus - oesophagus junction; C. ventriculus - intestine junction; D. caudal end showing the mucron, anal opening and anal glands. Scanning electron microscopy images: E. cephalic end; F. rounded tail with a mucron; G. mucron. ag = anal glands, ao = anal opening, bt = boring tooth, e = oesophagus, ep = excretory pore, int = intestine, l = lips, mu = mucron, ve = ventriculus.
6.3.3 Phylogenetic analysis of the ITS region
Amplification of the ITS rDNA generated an approximately 900 bp product.
Based on comparison with reference ITS rDNA nucleotide sequences from GenBank
Chapter 6 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
162
database, all 21 specimens of Anisakis type I larvae from the present study were
identified as Anisakis typica. The nucleotide sequences from the present study
exhibited 99.1 - 100 % similarities to the published sequence of Anisakis typica
(AB432909) found in Indian mackerel (Rastrelliger kanagurta) in Thailand and 96.1 -
97.6 % similarities to the published sequence of Anisakis typica (JQ798962) found in
cutlassfish (Trichiurus lepturus) from Brazil. The sequences exhibited 82.7 - 88.7 %
similarities with other Anisakis species (Table 6-3). Both NJ and ML analyses produced
trees with similar topology. Neighbour-joining analysis of the ITS nucleotide sequences
from the present study with previously reported sequences from GenBank clustered all
the Anisakis Type I larvae examined with Anisakis typica (Fig. 6-5).
Table 6-3: Percentage similarity of the Anisakis species analysed in the present study and their closest relatives. At the ITS locus, comparison with A. typica, accession numbers AB432909 and JQ798962 were presented. Anisakis sp.* is conspecific with A. nascettii (Mattiucci et al., 2009).
% similarity at:
Species compared ITS rRNA locus Cox2 locus
A. typica 99.1 - 100 92.4 - 99.3
A. ziphidarum 87.5 - 88.7 82.1 – 84.3
A. pegreffii 85.4 - 86.2 84.7 - 87.2
A. simplex s. s 85.6 - 86.3 84.7 - 86.7
A. simplex C 85.8 - 86.6 84.2-85.8
Anisakis sp.* 86.5 - 87.8 not analysed
A. nascettii not analysed 83.9 - 86.7
A. physeteris 82.7 – 83.9 82.8 - 84.5
A. brevispiculata 78.6 - 80.1 77.0 – 79.1
A. paggiae 83.8 - 84.7 79.3 – 82.2
Chapter 6 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
163
Figure 6-5: Phylogenetic relationships between Anisakis species from the present study (*) and other Anisakis species as inferred by neighbour-joining analysis of ITS rDNA. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Kimura-2 parameter method and the rate variation among sites was modelled with a gamma distribution with Contracaecum osculatum as an outgroup. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1, 000 replicates) are shown at the internal nodes (> 50 % only). Specimen codes are given in Table 6-2.
Chapter 6 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
164
Figure 6-6: Phylogenetic relationships between Anisakis species from the present study (*) and other Anisakis species inferred using the neighbour-joining analysis of cox2 genes. The evolutionary distances were computed using Tamura-Nei model and the rate variation among sites was modelled with a gamma distribution with Contracaecum osculatum as an outgroup. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in a bootstrap test (1, 000 replicates) are shown next to the branches (> 50 % only). Specimen codes are given in Table 6-2.
Amplification of the cox2 gene generated an approximately 629 bp product. As
with the ITS locus, NJ and ML analyses produced trees with similar topology.
Neighbour-joining analysis of cox2 nucleotide sequences showed that all isolates
clustered broadly with A. typica (DQ116427) but revealed more variation. Two broad
Chapter 6 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
165
groups were produced with subgroup I consisting of 5 isolates and A. typica reference
sequence (DQ116427), and subgroup II containing 16 isolates (Fig. 6-6). Based on
genetic distance analysis, subgroup I had 98.9 - 99.3 % similarity to A. typica
(DQ116427) while subgroup II had 92.4 - 94.6 % similarity to A. typica (DQ116427). The
cox2 nucleotide sequences from the present study shared 77.0 - 87.2 % similarity with
other known Anisakis species (Table 6-3).
6.4 Discussion
Anisakid larvae were found in 7.6 % (21/276) of the 7 fish species examined.
The intensity of infection was low (n ranged from 1 to 6) in all fish hosts except for
Pinjalo pinjalo (n = 120) (Table 6-2). Previous studies have reported wide variation in
prevalence and intensity of infection of anisakids in other fish hosts (Costa et al., 2003;
Farjallah et al., 2008a; Farjallah et al., 2008b; Setyobudi et al., 2011). The relatively low
infection level found in the present study could be due to the fact that most of the fish
hosts sampled were relatively small in size (ranged 16 - 49 cm, fork length) compared
to previous studies. In general, prevalence and parasite burden tend to increase with
the size and the age of the fish host (Setyobudi et al., 2011).
All nematodes in the present study were identified morphologically as Anisakis
Type I larvae, based on an oblique connection between the ventriculus and the
intestine, lack of a ventricular appendage and intestinal caecum, and the presence of a
mucron (Berland, 1961; Cannon, 1977). Larvae of A. typica found in cutlassfish
(Trichiurus lepturus) from Brazil shared similar morphological characteristics with the
A. typica larvae from the present study (Borges et al., 2012).
Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences indicated that all examined samples
were Anisakis typica. At the ITS locus, all isolates examined formed a single clade with
A. typica. The comparison of the ITS nucleotide sequences from this study with
sequences previously deposited in GenBank resulted in 96.1 - 97.6 % similarities to
A. typica found in cutlassfish (accession no. JQ798962) from Brazil and 99.1 - 100 %
similarities to A. typica (accession no. AB432909) from Indian mackerel in Thailand.
Chapter 6 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
166
At the cox2 locus, whilst the isolates clustered broadly with the reference
A. typica genotype, two distinct subgroups (I: 98.9 - 99.3 % similarity and II: 92.4 -
94.6 % similarity) were identified. Previously reported cox2 trees by Valentini et al.
(2006) also showed similar genetic divergence within the Anisakis typica clade.
Furthermore, the sequence difference of 5.4 - 7.6 % between the subgroup II clade and
the reference A. typica sequence is still within the range found between conspecifics in
other nematode taxa (Blouin et al., 1998).
According to Mattiucci and Nascetti (2006), Anisakis species form two sister
clades and A. typica is grouped within clade I, based on phylogenetic relationships
inferred from allozyme and mitochondrial gene markers. In the present study, A. typica
clustered within clade I at the cox2 locus, consistent with previously reported
phylogenetic trees (Valentini et al., 2006; Mattiucci et al., 2009; Cavallero et al., 2011;
Setyobudi et al., 2011). However, at the ITS locus, A. typica did not cluster within clade
1 and formed a separate group to the two clades. Other studies have shown similar
tree topology at the ITS locus (Kijewska et al., 2009b; Cavallero et al., 2011). Anisakis
typica could form a distinct lineage (resulting in three clades, rather than two, for the
genus Anisakis). It should be noted, however, that the position of A. typica in both the
ITS tree and cox2 tree was not well supported (< 50 % bootstrap support) in our study
and therefore more sampling of the species from a wider range of hosts and
geographical areas is needed to resolve this discrepancy.
The present study identified seven new fish species (Decapterus macarellus,
Gerres oblongus, Pinjalo lewisi, Pinjalo pinjalo, Selar crumenophthalmus,
Scomberomorus maculatus and Thunnus albacares) as hosts for A. typica. Previous
studies have identified A. typica in more than 15 different fish hosts, which have an
epipelagic distribution in the Atlantic Ocean close to the coastlines of Brazil, Mauritius,
Morocco, Portugal and Madeira (Mattiucci et al., 2002; Pontes et al., 2005; Marques et
al., 2006; Farjallah et al., 2008a; Iniguez et al., 2009; Kijewska et al., 2009b). Anisakis
typica has also been found in the Mediterranean Sea close to Tunisia, Libya, Cyprus
and Crete, and in the Indian Ocean off Somalia (Mattiucci et al., 2002; Farjallah et al.,
2008b) and Australia (Yann, 2006). Furthermore A. typica has been found in Japan,
Chapter 6 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
167
Taiwan, China, Thailand and Indonesia (Chen et al., 2008; Palm et al., 2008; Umehara
et al., 2010). Although it has been hypothesized that A. typica has a global distribution
that extends from a 30 °S to a 35 °N latitude (Mattiucci and Nascetti, 2006), a previous
distribution model for anisakid species has not included PNG (Kuhn et al., 2011).
6.5 Conclusions
In conclusion, all anisakids identified from PNG in the present study were
A. typica, which has not previously been associated with human infections. Further
studies are needed to extend the knowledge of anisakid species distribution in larger
fish hosts and other seafood hosts in Papua New Guinean waters, but the present
results suggest that the danger from zoonotic anisakid species in PNG is very low.
169
Chapter 7
7. Prevalence of Chlamydia in sheep and goats
from PNG by quantitative PCR
Chapter 7 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
This chapter describes the screening for Chlamydia abortus and C. pecorum
using a species-specific multiplex qPCR assay in sheep and goats from PNG.
Research highlights:
The overall prevalence of C. abortus was 12.2 % (27/221) in sheep and was 8.6
% (11/128) in goats in all farm types.
The overall prevalence of C. pecorum was 7.7 % (17/221) in sheep and was 8.6
% (11/128) in goats in all farm types.
7.1 Introduction
Chlamydiae are obligate intracellular bacteria, which cause a variety of diseases
in humans and animals, worldwide. The taxonomy of Chlamydia and infection with
Chlamydia abortus and C. pecorum are described in Chapter 1, Section 1.7.
Little is known about Chlamydia in sheep and goats in PNG. Therefore, the aim
of the present study was to use a species-specific multiplex qPCR assay for C. abortus
and C. pecorum to investigate the prevalence and species of Chlamydia found in sheep
and goats over a wide geographical area, representative for the major sheep and goat
farming regions of PNG.
7.2 Methods
This section summarises the most important methods used to obtain the
results described in this chapter. A detailed description of all methods is described in
Chapter 2 of this thesis.
7.2.1 Sample collection
Faecal samples from 221 sheep and 128 goats collected in PNG from February
to April 2011 were screened for Chlamydia. The details of sample collection are
described in Chapter 2, Sections 2.3 - 2.6.
7.2.2 DNA isolation and qPCR amplification
Total DNA was extracted from 250 mg of faeces using a PowerSoil® DNA
isolation kit (MO BIO laboratories, Carlsbad, California, USA) (see Chapter 2, Section
2.8.1). All samples were screened for the presence of C. abortus and C. pecorum using
a multiplex qPCR assay, which targets the amplification of the outer membrane protein
Chapter 7 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
171
cell surface antigen gene (ompA) as previously described (Yang et al., 2014c). The
details of this assay are described in Chapter 2, Section 2.9.6.
7.2.3 Data analysis
Prevalences (samples which were positive for C. abortus or C. pecorum) were
expressed as a percentage of positive samples, with 95 % confidence intervals
calculated assuming a binomial distribution, using the software Quantitative
Parasitology 3.0 (Rozsa et al., 2000). Differences in prevalence among groups were
compared by Fisher’s exact test (FET). Where multiple pairwise comparisons were
made among groups, a Bonferroni correction was applied to maintain an experiment-
wide Type I error rate of 5 %.
7.3 Results
The overall prevalence of C. abortus was 12.2 % (27/221) in sheep and 8.6 %
(11/128) in goats. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of C. abortus
between sheep and goats (FET: p = 0.3733). In each farm type, the prevalence of
C. abortus ranged from 6.0 % (smallholder farms) to 34.8 % (Baisu) for sheep and 4.6 %
(Labu) to 33.3 % (Menifo) for goats (Table 7-1). There were no differences in the
prevalences of C. abortus between farm types for sheep with one exception, that is the
prevalence observed in the public institution (Baisu) was higher than in the smallholder
farms (FET: p < 0.005) (Table 7-2). There were no differences in the prevalences of
C. abortus between farm types for goats (FET: p values > 0.005) (Table 7-2).
The overall prevalence of C. pecorum was 7.7 % (17/221) in sheep and 8.6 %
(11/128) in goat. There was no difference in the prevalence of C. pecorum between
sheep and goats (FET: p = 0.8386). ). In each farm type, the prevalence of C. pecorum
ranged from 6.5 % (Tambul) to 13 % (Baisu) for sheep and 1.9 % (smallholder) to 18.2
% (Labu) for goats (Table 7-1). There were no differences in the prevalences of
C. pecorum between farm types for both sheep and goats (FET: p values > 0.0083)
(Table 7-2).
Chapter 7 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
Table 7-1: Prevalence of Chlamydia in sheep and goats in the present study. N = the total number of faecal samples for sheep and goats. P = the number of animals, which were positive for Chlamydia abortus or C. pecorum. Given in parentheses are percent prevalence and 95 % confidence interval (CI). RI = Research institute.
N P (% , 95 % CI) P (%, 95 % CI)
Type of farm Sheep C. abortus C. pecorum
Lowland RI (Labu) 35 4 (11.43, 3.7 - 27.7) 3 (8.6, 2.2 - 24.2)
Highland RI (Tambul) 93 10 (10.8, 5.6 – 19.3) 6 (6.5, 2.7 – 14.1)
Public Institute (Baisu) 23 8 (34.8, 17.2 – 57.2) 3 (13, 3.4 - 34.7)
Government 3 1 (33.3, 1.8 - 87.5) _
Smallholder 67 4 (6, 1.9 - 15.4) 5 (7.5, 2.8 – 17.3)
Total 221 27 (12.2, 8.4 – 17.5) 17 (7.7, 4.7 - 12.2)
Goat
Lowland RI (Labu) 22 1 (4.6, 0.24 – 24.9) 4 (18.2, 6.0 – 41.0)
Highland RI (Tambul) 21 3 (14.3, 3.8 – 37.4) 1 (4.8, 0.3 – 25.9)
Public Institute (Baisu) 29 2 (6.9, 1.2 – 24.2) 5 (17.2, 6.5 – 36.5)
Government 3 1 (33.3, 1.8 – 87.5) _
Smallholder 53 4 (7.6, 2.5 – 19.1) 1 (1.9, 0.1 – 11.4)
Total 128 11 (8.6, 4.6 – 15.2) 11 (8.6, 4.6 – 15.2)
Table 7-2: Comparisons of prevalences for Chlamydia in sheep and goats between farm types. All pairs of farms were compared by FET. A Bonferroni correction was used to determine significance at Bonferroni corrected significance levels of < 0.005 for C. abortus and < 0.008333 for C. pecorum. * = values are significantly different between farms types. RI = Research Institute.
p values p values
Data sets Sheep Goats
C. abortus
Lowland RI (Labu) vs Highland RI (Tambul) 1.0000 0.3449
Lowland RI (Labu) vs Public Institute (Baisu) 0.0473 1.0000
Lowland RI (Labu) vs Menifo 0.3532 0.2300
Lowland RI (Labu) vs Smallholder 0.4410 1.0000
Highland RI (Tambul) vs Public Institute (Baisu) 0.0087 0.6378
Highland RI (Tambul) vs Menifo 0.3087 0.4368
Highland RI (Tambul) vs Smallholder 0.3984 0.3972
Public Institute (Baisu) vs Menifo 1.0000 0.2633
Public Institute (Baisu) vs Smallholder 0.0015* 1.0000
Menifo vs Smallholder 0.2020 0.2487
C. pecorum
Lowland RI (Labu) vs Highland RI (Tambul) 0.7043 0.3449
Lowland RI (Labu) vs Public Institute (Baisu) 0.6727 1.0000
Lowland RI (Labu) vs Smallholder 1.0000 0.0240
Highland RI (Tambul) vs Public Institute (Baisu) 0.3784 0.3803
Highland RI (Tambul) vs Smallholder 1.0000 0.4898
Public Institute (Baisu) vs Smallholder 0.4162 0.0193
Chapter 7 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
7.4 Discussion
This is the first study to detect C. abortus and C. pecorum in sheep and goats
(clinically healthy adult animals at the time of sampling) in PNG. The prevalence
observed for C. abortus was 12.2 % (27/221) in sheep in the present study. This rate is
within the range of reported prevalences of C. abortus in clinically healthy adult sheep
(free from diarrhoea, history of abortion or respiratory diseases), for example, 6.7 % in
Egypt (Osman et al., 2011) and 50 % in Germany (Lenzko et al., 2011). The prevalence
of C. abortus is usually higher in diseased sheep (presence of diarrhoea, history of
abortion or respiratory diseases). For example, in Egypt, the prevalence of C. abortus
was 25.7 % in diseased sheep (Osman et al., 2011).
In this study, the prevalence of C. abortus was low (8.6 %, 11/128) in clinically
healthy goats. A previous study in Egypt reported a higher prevalence of C. abortus in
in clinically healthy (free from diarrhoea, history of abortion or respiratory diseases)
(50 %) and diseased (presence of diarrhoea, history of abortion or respiratory diseases)
(16.2 %) goats (Osman et al., 2011). The higher prevalences in the previous study
compared to the present study could be due to the techniques used for screening, as
well as, the total number of animals sampled. In Egypt, molecular identification was
not performed directly on faecal samples collected from sheep and goats, but from
embryonated chicken eggs inoculated with cell cultures of faecal samples from sheep
and goats (Osman et al., 2011). Furthermore, fewer sheep and goats were screened
(sheep: asymptomatic n = 10 and diseased n = 59; goats: asymptomatic n = 12 and
diseased n = 24) (Osman et al., 2011), thereby, giving a higher prevalence than the
present study.
An obvious limitation of the present study is that vaginal swabs were not
screened and therefore the true prevalence of C. abortus in sheep and goats in PNG
may be higher. However, C. abortus is commonly found in faeces as well as the genital
tract (Herrmann et al., 2000; Tsakos et al., 2001; Longbottom et al., 2002; Longbottom
and Coulter, 2003; Jee et al., 2004; Lenzko et al., 2011; Talafha et al., 2012) and
previous studies have shown that C. abortus is frequently detected in faecal samples
by qPCR (Jee et al., 2004; Lenzko et al., 2011).
Chapter 7 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
174
The prevalence of C. abortus in sheep was higher in public institutional farms
(Baisu) than in smallholder farms. The lower prevalence observed in smallholder farms
could be due to the fact that the stocking rates were much lower (each smallholder
farms owned 3 – 20 animals), thus resulting in little contamination and spread of
C. abortus.
The prevalence of C. pecorum was 7.7 % (17/221) in sheep and 8.6 % (11/128)
in goats in the present study. In contrast, other studies have detected a high
prevalence of C. pecorum in clinically healthy adult sheep in Germany (47 %) (Lenzko
et al., 2011) and Australia (30. 1 %, 1027/3412) (Yang et al., 2014c). The observed
differences in the prevalence could be due to stocking rates and faecal contamination
of pastures and resting places. The flock sizes ranged from 6 – 115 in the present
study, 250 – 1, 800 in Germany (Lenzko et al., 2011) and 300 – 5, 500 in Australia (Yang
et al., 2014c). Faecal shedding is an important mode of transmission for Chlamydia
spp. (Shewen, 1980; Brenner J., 2001). The high prevalences observed in Germany and
Australia may be due to high contamination of pasture or resting places, where animal
numbers are large.
There are very few studies which have screened goats’ faecal samples for
C. pecorum. For example, in Egypt, Osman et al. (2011) did not identify C. pecorum in
goats, although it was present in sheep (at low prevalence). Chlamydia pecorum is
commonly isolated from the digestive tract of ruminants, in which the infections are
clinically inconspicuous, but under circumstances of stress, host animals may shed the
organism in large numbers and may suffer from clinical disease (Shewen, 1980; Osman
et al., 2011).
In summary, low prevalences of C. abortus and C. pecorum in sheep and goats
in the present study could be due to low distribution of the bacteria in the biological
material. Also, the observed lower prevalence could be related to low contamination
of environment with these bacteria; however further epidemiological studies are
needed. The analytical sensitivity may be a contributing factor for the observed lower
prevalence. The multiplex qPCR assay used for screening the samples in the present
was previously validated by Yang et al. (2004c). The detection limit for C. abortus and
Chapter 7 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
175
C. pecorum was 5 and 5 organisms respectively per 1 µL of faecal DNA extract (Yang et
al., 2004c). Therefore, the detection technique is unlikely be a contributing factor to
the observed low prevalences.
7.5 Conclusions
In conclusion, prevalences of C. abortus and C. pecorum in sheep and goats in
PNG were low in comparison to previous studies, which also used molecular methods
for detection. However, the results of the present study indicate that C. abortus occurs
in sheep and goats in PNG and could pose a risk of transmission to humans, especially
in villages in PNG, where the small ruminants are cared for by women on a daily basis.
Little is known about chlamydial abortions in women in PNG. Previous studies in PNG
have focused on C. trachomatis infections, for which the reported prevalences were
from 14 – 26.1 % in females (Theunissen et al., 1995; Vallely et al. 2010).
Future studies should include surveys on the history of abortion in sheep and
goats, and compare clinically healthy Chlamydia-positive flocks with diseased flocks
(those with clinical chlamydial infection) and flocks with reproductive disorders
without chlamydial infections to determine the clinical impact of Chlamydia in PNG.
Also, further isolation and characterisation of Chlamydia spp. are required to assess
their possible zoonotic potential.
Chapter 8
8. General discussion and concluding remarks
Chapter 8 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
8.1 General discussion
The focus of the work conducted in this thesis was to investigate the
epidemiology of gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep and goats in PNG and to detect
potential zoonotic pathogens present in these animals in smallholder and institutional
flocks, as well as, government breeding sites. Also, fish were sampled in aquaculture
farms, rivers and marine systems to specifically identify potential zoonotic
gastrointestinal parasites (Cryptosporidium, Giardia and anisakids), which may
represent a source of illness for local populations. It should be noted that sample
collection in rural areas in PNG is logistically difficult, especially in the remote areas
where most of the sampling was done. The present study represents the most detailed
investigation of gastrointestinal parasites in sheep, goats and fish in PNG to date, using
molecular tools, and a variety of gastrointestinal pathogens were identified. This
provides an important update on internal pathogens of sheep and goats from previous
studies (Quartermain, 2004b).
A high prevalence of gastrointestinal nematodes, especially Haemonchus
contortus, and protozoa, particularly Eimeria spp., were detected in both sheep and
goats (Chapter 3). According to the survey questionnaire, most smallholder farmers did
not know about parasites and the diseases they can cause in their flocks, which may be
one reason for the high prevalence observed in the smallholder settings. In the
research institute farms, although anthelmintics were given to the flocks to control the
burden of gastrointestinal nematodes, the animals were kept at higher stocking rates
compared to smallholder farms, lambing pens were dirty and floors of the resting
houses were not swept. These factors may contribute to the spread of gastrointestinal
parasites (Van Metre, 2013).
The main goal of employing practises to control gastrointestinal parasites in
farm management is to break their life cycle, which can be done in a variety of ways
including the use of anthelmintics, pasture management and animal management.
Good pasture management as well as the use of anthelmintics, depends on the level of
anthelmintic resistance in a particular flock (Sani et al., 2004). Parasite control can be
exercised even without the use of anthelmintics through practises such as rotational
Chapter 8 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
179
grazing and applying basic hygienic measures, but requires considerable efforts in
management and planning and the farmers continued commitment to these activities
(Sani et al., 2004). Committed farmers in turn need support and clear advice from
informed veterinary practitioners, animal scientists, and extension workers on
relevant, scientifically sound strategies for parasite control. In low-income countries
like PNG, this infrastructure is often not established.
PNG has a climate ideal for development of H. contortus, Teladorsagia
(Ostertagia), and Trichostrongylus spp., where the latter two genera occur especially in
the cool highlands areas. Rational grazing, where sheep and goats are allowed to graze
in a paddock for 3 - 4 days, after which they are moved to another paddock (Sani et al.,
2004) may be an appropriate strategy to reduce parasite burden in sheep and goats in
PNG. The potential success of such methods is due to the relatively short larval survival
times on open pasture. Previous studies of trichostrongylid nematodes on open
pasture in humid tropical climates in Southeast Asia found that eggs developed to
infective larvae in a minimum time of 3 – 4 days after faecal deposition and most
larvae developed within seven days. Infective larvae on open pasture survived for 5 - 6
weeks, and on vegetation under tree crops survived for 5 - 8 weeks (Cheah and
Rajamanickam, 1997; Sam-Mohan, 1995; Sani, 1994). The relatively short larval
survival times observed allows for the integration of grazing management with worm
control. Small ruminants can safely graze for 3 - 4 days in an area which is ‘rested’ for 5
- 6 weeks (Sani et al., 2004).
In addition, low-cost and simple diagnostic tools, such FAMACHA (described in
Chapter 1, Section 1.2.4) (van Wyk et al, 2002), could be used by farmers in PNG for
diagnosis of anaemia, so that the affected sheep and goats can be selectively treated
with anthelmintic drugs.
The protozoan parasites, Cryptosporidium and Giardia were also found in
sheep, goats and fish (Chapters 4 and 5) in the present study, however the pathogenic
effects of these parasites in PNG need to be further investigated. Sheep and goat
producers should be informed of the clinical signs (diarrhoea) caused by these
protozoa and measures should be taken if disease signs are observed in young animals
Chapter 8 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
180
to prevent the spread of these parasites to other animals, or to humans. Such
measures include but are not limited to an improvement of hygiene (clean pens,
washing of hands).
In terms of molecular characterisation, the present study did not characterise
assemblages of G. duodenalis and future studies using techniques such as PCR and
sequencing are needed to genotype G. duodenalis isolates to assemblage level to
better understand the zoonotic potential of this parasite in these hosts. The present
study used a qPCR assay to determine the presence or absence of G. duodenalis.
The work described in Chapter 6 was aimed at identifying zoonotic anisakid
nematodes in fish, as fish are a major source of food for people living in coastal villages
and towns in PNG. Papua New Guineans prepare their fish by smoking, steaming and
deep-frying. More recently, raw seafood dishes, especially, sushi and sashimi, are
becoming popular in hotels and restaurants in towns and cities due to an increasing
international community. In addition to the consumption of raw fish dishes, the
presence of live third stage larvae of anisakid nematodes, in smoked fish or deep fried
fish, could cause health implications (Bier, 1976; Hauck, 1977; Gardiner, 1990; Kim et
al., 2006). The present study did not find zoonotic anisakid species in a variety of fish
hosts in PNG; however, further studies are necessary to confirm the absence of
zoonotic anisakid in PNG waters.
In Chapter 7, a species-specific multiplex qPCR assay was used to screen for
C. abortus and C. pecorum in sheep and goats from PNG. Both pathogens were
prevalent in sheep and goats in all the farms types. The presence of Chlamydia in small
ruminants in PNG has not been investigated before. A possible explanation for this is
that livestock officers, veterinarians and human health professionals are not
necessarily aware of the widespread occurrence and zoonotic nature of Chlamydia. As
both species could cause abortion in sheep and goats, this study provides valuable
information for researchers and veterinarians who are working to improve production
of sheep and goats throughout the country. Everyone in contact with sheep and goats
should be informed about the clinical signs of Chlamydia. It is particularly important
Chapter 8 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
181
that pregnant women in rural areas should be made aware of the risks of C. abortus
and how to avoid infection.
8.2 Future directions
There are many open questions remaining, which require scientific work
beyond the scope of this thesis and research opportunities which have arisen due to
the performed work. Some of the most important questions originating from this
research are raised in the next few paragraphs.
(1) What diseases are prevalent in sheep and goats in PNG?
There is little current research documenting the consequences of internal
pathogens on sheep and goats in PNG. Documentation is limited because, in the past,
small ruminants in PNG have been perceived to be less important than pigs, poultry
and cattle (Quartermain, 2004b). Therefore, human and financial resources available
for research, directed at sheep and goats, have been limited. The farmers in the
present study said they have noticed foot-rot disease, diarrhoea and coughing in their
sheep and goats, yet, most were unaware of other diseases and the underlying
pathogens causing the diseases in their flocks.
Further studies into internal pathogen species/genotype epidemiology,
especially in the lowland smallholder farms in areas with different levels of rainfall, are
required. The present study provided insights into gastrointestinal nematodes
(including trichostrongylids, Strongyloides and Trichuris), liver fluke (Fasciola), cestode
(Moniezia), protozoa (Eimeria, Cryptosporidium and Giardia) and bacteria (C. abortus
and C. pecorum), in a warm lowland site (Labu) and the highland sites (smallholder
farms, Menifo, Baisu and Tambul). However, more information about other important
infectious agents of small ruminants is needed. Specifically, other important pathogens
known to cause diarrhoea (Escherichia coli, Salmonella sp., Clostridium perfringins, and
rotavirus) and abortion (Campylobacter fetus, Toxoplasma gondii, Brucella ovis) in
sheep and goats should be investigated.
Due to the scarcity of veterinary research in PNG and the associated severe
knowledge gaps, a large scale longitudinal research study is needed to:
Chapter 8 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
182
(i) collect data on the epidemiology of a wide range of pathogens in different
geographical areas and farm types at different time points, in both warm and
cool agro-ecological zones, to determine the distribution of different
species/genotypes of internal pathogens (parasites, bacteria and viruses) across
different geographical areas, and;
(ii) to determine in detail, the impact on human and animal health as well as the
economic impact, caused by these pathogens in PNG.
However, it should be noted that such studies are logistically difficult and costly
to conduct in PNG for several reasons. The smallholder farms are remote and to
ensure the samples are kept viable, the sampling team has to stay in a nearby town or
village, where there is power for refrigeration. Roads are usually in very poor condition
and only 4WD vehicles may be used. Furthermore, farmers have to be notified a day in
advance, before sampling so that animals are kept in the night house on the day the
field team arrives. This is often very difficult due to the lack of telecommunication.
(2) What are the longitudinal prevalence rates of pathogens and transmission
dynamics of zoonotic pathogens?
This study was a cross-sectional study (faecal samples collected at one time
point) and the true prevalence, especially of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia spp.,
Chlamydia abortus and Chlamydia pecorum may be underestimated due to factors
such as intermittent shedding, seasonal variation and imperfect detection. Therefore,
their true prevalence may be considerably higher in PNG and future longitudinal
studies, as described above, could give more accurate estimates. Also, as these
pathogens have zoonotic potential, further studies should include a wide range of
hosts such as humans, companion animals and cattle, to more fully understand their
transmission dynamics in PNG.
(3) Which fish species serve as hosts for Cryptosporidium and Giardia?
Further morphological and histological analyses of Cryptosporidium and Giardia
in fish hosts are required (in addition to genetic studies) to identify sites of infection
Chapter 8 Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
183
and confirm that fish hosts are actually infected and not just serving as mechanical
transmitters of Cryptosporidium and Giardia oo/cysts, as this information is currently
lacking. This is particularly important for zoonotic species of Cryptosporidium and
Giardia. Infection studies that inoculate fish with zoonotic species of Cryptosporidium
and Giardia and subsequent morphological/histological and genetic studies should be
conducted to better understand the transmission dynamics of zoonotic
Cryptosporidium and Giardia in fish hosts.
(4) What is the true burden of gastrointestinal nematodes in livestock?
A wider analysis of total worm counts and histopathological analysis of tissue
sections of sheep and goats in a flock are critical to determine the burden of nematode
infections in the gut to allow decisions about treatment of flocks with anthelmintics. In
addition, although this study used molecular tools to identify species of strongylid
nematodes, future studies should include larval culture (on individual faecal samples),
in addition to worm egg counts for species identification of internal helminths. In PNG,
where molecular tools are rare in veterinary (research) laboratories, larval cultures are
critical. However, for such studies to take place, a better veterinary science
infrastructure needs to be established in PNG. But the funds available to build state-of-
the-art facilities for molecular research in veterinary research are scarce. To date,
there are several PCR machines in all of PNG and these are located in PNG Institute of
Medical Research and the Port General Hospital for use with samples from humans.
8.3 Concluding remarks
The results generated in this study have been given to the livestock research
team at NARI in Labu, who can disseminate information to breeders and farmers in the
country. To reduce the burden caused by gastrointestinal parasites and improve
productivity of sheep and goats, veterinary scientists at NARI could assist farmers in
understanding the diseases and control measures that could be applied to prevent
contamination and illness in their animals.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
Bibliography
Abdelrahman, Y.M., Belland, R.J., 2005. The chlamydial developmental cycle. FEMS
Microbiol. Rev. 29, 949-959.
Abdurrahman, 2007. The prevalence of Eimeria species in goats in Igdir. Turk. J. Vet.
Anim. Sd. 6, 411-414.
Abe, N., Tominaga, K., Kimata, I., 2006. Usefulness of PCR-restriction fragment length
polymorphism analysis of the internal transcribed spacer region of rDNA for
identification of Anisakis simplex complex. JPN. J. Infect. Dis. 59, 60-62.
Abebe, R., Gebreyohannes, M., Mekuria, S., Abunna, F., Regassa, A., 2011.
Gastrointestinal nematode infections in small ruminants under the traditional
husbandry system during the dry season in southern Ethiopia. Trop. Anim.
Health Prod. 42, 1111-1117.
Abollo, E., Gestal, C., Pascual, S., 2001. Anisakid infection in the European shag
Phalacrocorax aristotelis aristotelis. J. Helminthol. 75, 209-214.
Adam, R.D., 2001. Biology of Giardia lamblia. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 14, 447-475.
ADB/NACA 1991. Fish health management in the Asia-Pacific region. Report on a
regional study and workshop on fish disease and fish health management. ADB
Agricult. Dep. Rep. Ser. No. 1. Network of Aquaculture Centres in the Asia-
Pacific Region, Bangkok, Thailand.
Aiello, S.E., Moses, M.A., Lane, K.A.G., Schindler, S.T., Short, S.C., Steigerwald, M.A.
(Eds.) 2012a. Coccidiosis. The Merck Veterinary Manual online.
http://www.merckmanuals.com (accessed 22 April 2013).
Aiello, S.E., Moses, M.A., Lane, K.A.G., Schindler, S.T., Short, S.C., Steigerwald, M.A.
(Eds.) 2012b. Gastrointestinal parasites of sheep and goats. The Merck
Veterinary Manual online. http://www.merckmanuals.com (accessed 29 April
2013).
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
185
Aiello, S.E., Moses, M.A., Lane, K.A.G., Schindler, S.T., Short, S.C., Steigerwald, M.A.
2012c (Eds.). Parasitic diseases of fish. The Merck Veterinary Manual online.
http://www.merckmanuals.com (accessed 29 April 2013).
Al-Quaisy, H.H., Al-Zubaidy, A.J., Altaif, K.I., Makkawi, T.A., 1987. The pathogenicity of
haemonchosis in sheep and goats in Iraq: 1. Clinical, parasitological and
haematological findings. Vet. Parasitol. 24, 221-228.
Alemu, S., Leykun, E.G., Ayelet, G., Zeleke, A., 2006. Study on small ruminant
lungworms in northeastern Ethiopia. Vet. Parasitol. 142, 330-335.
Aloisio, F., Filippini, G., Antenucci, P., Lepri, E., Pezzotti, G., Caccio, S.M., Pozio, E.,
2006. Severe weight loss in lambs infected with Giardia duodenalis assemblage
B. Vet. Parasitol. 142, 154-158.
Alonso, A., Moreno-Ancillo, A., Daschner, A., Lopez-Serrano, M.C., 1999. Dietary
assessment in five cases of allergic reactions due to gastroallergic anisakiasis.
Allergy 54, 517-520.
Alvarez-Pellitero, P., Quiroga, M.I., Sitja-Bobadilla, A., Redondo, M.J., Palenzuela, O.,
Padros, F., Vazquez, S., Nieto, J.M., 2004. Cryptosporidium scophthalmi n. sp.
(Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae) from cultured turbot Scophthalmus maximus.
Light and electron microscope description and histopathological study. Dis.
Aquat. Organ. 62, 133-145.
Alvarez-Pellitero, P., Sitja-Bobadilla, A., 2002. Cryptosporidium molnari n. sp.
(Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae) infecting two marine fish species, Sparus
aurata L. and Dicentrarchus labrax L. Int. J. Parasitol. 32, 1007-1021.
Alyousefi, N.A., Mahdy, M.A., Lim, Y.A., Xiao, L., Mahmud, R., 2013. First molecular
characterization of Cryptosporidium in Yemen. Parasitol. 140, 729-734.
Amar, C.F., Dear, P.H., Pedraza-Diaz, S., Looker, N., Linnane, E., McLauchlin, J., 2002.
Sensitive PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism assay for detection
and genotyping of Giardia duodenalis in human feces. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40,
446-452.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
186
Amer, S., Honma, H., Ikarashi, M., Tada, C., Fukuda, Y., Suyama, Y., Nakai, Y., 2010.
Cryptosporidium genotypes and subtypes in dairy calves in Egypt. Vet. Parasitol.
169, 382-386.
Amin, O.M., Eidelman, W.S., Domke, W., Bailey, J., Pfeifer, G., 2000. An unusual case of
anisakiasis in California, U.S.A. Comp. Parasitol. 67, 71-75.
Anderson, J.L., 1960. Animal health picture of the Territory of Papua and New Guinea.
P. N. G. Agric. J. 13, 52-58.
Anderson, R.C., 2000. Nematode parasites of vertebrates. Their development and
transmission. Wallingford, UK, CABI Publishing.
Angulo-Cubillan, F.J., Garcia-Coiradas, L., Cuquerella, M., de la Fuente, C., Alunda,
y.J.M., 2007. Haemonchus contortus- sheep relationship: a review. Revista
Cientifica 17, 577-587.
Ankarklev, J., Jerlstrom-Hultqvist, J., Ringqvist, E., Troell, K., Svard, S.G., 2010. Behind
the smile: cell biology and disease mechanisms of Giardia species. Nat. Rev. 8,
413-422.
Arizono, N., Yamada, M., Tegoshi, T., Yoshikawa, M., 2012. Anisakis simplex sensu
stricto and Anisakis pegreffii: biological characteristics and pathogenetic
potential in human anisakiasis. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 9, 517-521.
Asato, R., Wakura, M., Sueyoshi, T., 1991. A case of human infection with Anisakis
physteris in Okinawa, Japan. JPN. J. Infect. Dis. 40, 181-183.
Asiba, G.B. 1987. Smallholder flock health. In: Sivasupiramaniam, S., Tupper, G. (Eds.)
Proceedings of the first symposium on sheep and goat production in Papua New
Guinea, held at Goroka 1–2 December 1987. Village Livestock Development
Project, Department of Agriculture and Livestock, Goroka, 14-18.
Audicana, M.T., Kennedy, M.W., 2008. Anisakis simplex: from obscure infectious worm
to inducer of immune hypersensitivity. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 21, 360-379.
Bagdonas, J., Petkevicius, S., Russo, P., Pepin, M., Salomskas, A., 2007. Prevalence and
epidemiological features of ovine enzootic abortion in Lithuania. Polish J. Vet.
Sci. 10, 239-244.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
187
Baker, R.L., Gray, G.D. 2004. Appropriate breeds and breeding schemes for sheep and
goats in the tropics, pp. 63-95 in Sani, R.A., Gray, G.D., Baker, R.L., (Eds.) Worm
control for small ruminants in tropical Asia. ACIAR Monograph No. 113.
Canberra, Australian Center for International Agriculture.
Baldursson, S., Karanis, P., 2011. Waterborne transmission of protozoan parasites:
review of worldwide outbreaks - an update 2004-2010. Water Res. 45, 6603-
6614.
Balicka-Ramisz, A., 1999. Studies on coccidiosis in goats in Poland. Vet. Parasitol. 81,
347-349.
Bangoura, B., Mundt, H.C., Schmaschke, R., Westphal, B., Daugschies, A., 2012.
Prevalence of Eimeria bovis and Eimeria zuernii in German cattle herds and
factors influencing oocyst excretion. Parasitol. Res. 110, 875-881.
Banks, D.J., Singh, R., Barger, I.A., Pratap, B., Le Jambre, L.F., 1990. Development and
survival of infective larvae of Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus
colubriformis on pasture in a tropical environment. Int. J. Parasitol. 20, 155-160.
Barger, I.A., Siale, K., Banks, D.J., Le Jambre, L.F., 1994. Rotational grazing for control of
gastrointestinal nematodes of goats in a wet tropical environment. Vet.
Parasitol. 53, 109-116.
Baud, D., Regan, L., Greub, G., 2008. Emerging role of Chlamydia and Chlamydia-like
organisms in adverse pregnancy outcomes. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 21, 70-76.
Berland, B., 1961. Nematodes from some Norwegian marine fishes. Sarsia 2, 1-50.
Berrag, B., Urquhart, G.M., 1996. Epidemiological aspects of lungworm infections of
goats in Morocco. Vet. Parasitol. 61, 81-85.
Berri, M., Rekiki, A., Boumedine, K.S., Rodolakis, A., 2009. Simultaneous differential
detection of Chlamydophila abortus, Chlamydophila pecorum and Coxiella
burnetii from aborted ruminant's clinical samples using multiplex PCR. BMC
Microbiol. 9, 130.
Bier, J.W., 1976. Experimental Anisakis: cultivation and temperature tolerance
determination. J. Milk Food Technol. 39: 132.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
188
Blouin, M.S., 1998. Mitochondrial DNA diversity in nematodes. J. Helminthol. 72, 285-
289.
Blouin, M.S., 2002. Molecular prospecting for cryptic species of nematodes:
mitochondrial DNA versus internal transcribed spacer. Int. J. Parasitol. 32, 527-
531.
Blouin, M.S., Yowell, C.A., Courtney, C.H., Dame, J.B., 1998. Substitution bias, rapid
saturation, and the use of mtDNA for nematode systematics. Mol. Biol. Evol.
15, 1719-1727.
Bomfim, T.C., Huber, F., Gomes, R.S., Alves, L.L., 2005. Natural infection by Giardia sp.
and Cryptosporidium sp. in dairy goats, associated with possible risk factors of
the studied properties. Vet. Parasitol. 134, 9-13.
Boone, J.H., Wilkins, T.D., Nash, T.E., Brandon, J.E., Macias, E.A., Jerris, R.C., Lyerly,
D.M., 1999. TechLab and alexon Giardia enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
kits detect cyst wall protein 1. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37, 611-614.
Borel, N., Doherr, M.G., Vretou, E., Psarrou, E., Thoma, R., Pospischil, A., 2004.
Seroprevalences for ovine enzootic abortion in Switzerland. Prev. Vet. Med. 65,
205-216.
Borges, J.N., Cunha, L.F., Santos, H.L., Monteiro-Neto, C., Portes Santos, C., 2012.
Morphological and molecular diagnosis of anisakid nematode larvae from
cutlassfish (Trichiurus lepturus) off the coast of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. PloS one
7, e40447.
Bott, N.J., Campbell, B.E., Beveridge, I., Chilton, N.B., Rees, D., Hunt, P.W., Gasser, R.B.,
2009. A combined microscopic-molecular method for the diagnosis of
strongylid infections in sheep. Int. J. Parasitol. 39, 1277-1287.
Bouree, P., Paugam, A., Petithory, J.C., 1995. Anisakidosis: report of 25 cases and
review of the literature. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 18, 75-84.
Bourke, M.R., 2010. Altitudinal limits of 230 economic crop species in Papua New
Guinea. pp. 473-513 in Haberle, S.G., Stevenson, J. & Prebble, M. (Eds) Altered
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
189
ecologies: fire, climate and human influence on terrestrial landscapes.
Canberra, The ANU E Press.
Brenner J., Y.Y.B.M., 2001. Intestinal chlamydiosis in the progeny of imported beef
cattle; first detected in Israel. Isr. J. Vet. Med. 56.
Brook, E.J., Anthony Hart, C., French, N.P., Christley, R.M., 2009. Molecular
epidemiology of Cryptosporidium subtypes in cattle in England. Vet. J. 179, 378-
382.
Budu-Amoako, E., Greenwood, S.J., Dixon, B.R., Barkema, H.W., McClure, J.T., 2011.
Foodborne illness associated with Cryptosporidium and Giardia from livestock.
J. Food. Prot. 74, 1944-1955.
Burgess, C.G., Bartley, Y., Redman, E., Skuce, P.J., Nath, M., Whitelaw, F., Tait, A.,
Gilleard, J.S., Jackson, F., 2012. A survey of the trichostrongylid nematode
species present on UK sheep farms and associated anthelmintic control
practices. Vet. Parasitol. 189, 299-307.
Burkholder, J.M., Glasgow, H.B., Hobbs, C.W., 1995. Fish kills linked to a toxic ambush-
predator dinoflagellate: distribution and environmental conditions. Mar. Eco.
Prog. Ser. 124, 43-61.
Buxton, D., Barlow, R.M., Finlayson, J., Anderson, I.E., Mackellar, A., 1990.
Observations on the pathogenesis of Chlamydia psittaci infection of pregnant
sheep. J. Comp. Pathol. 102, 221-237.
Caccio, S.M., De Giacomo, M., Pozio, E., 2002. Sequence analysis of the beta-giardin
gene and development of a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment
length polymorphism assay to genotype Giardia duodenalis cysts from human
faecal samples. Int. J. Parasitol. 32, 1023-1030.
Caccio, S.M., Sannella, A.R., Mariano, V., Valentini, S., Berti, F., Tosini, F., Pozio, E.,
2013. A rare Cryptosporidium parvum genotype associated with infection of
lambs and zoonotic transmission in Italy. Vet. Parasitol. 191, 128-131.
Caccio, S.M., Thompson, R.C., McLauchlin, J., Smith, H.V., 2005. Unravelling
Cryptosporidium and Giardia epidemiology. Trends Parasitol. 21, 430-437.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
190
Cannon, L.R., 1977. Some larval ascaridoids from south-eastern Queensland marine
fishes. Int. J. Parasitol. 7, 233-243.
Castro-Hermida, J.A., Almeid, A., Gonzalez-Warleta, M., Da Costa, J.M., Mezo, M.,
2006. Prevalence and preliminary genetic analysis of Giardia isolated from
adult sheep in Galicia (northwest Spain). J. Euk. Microbiol. 53 (Suppl 1), S172-
173.
Castro-Hermida, J.A., Almeida, A., Gonzalez-Warleta, M., Correia da Costa, J.M.,
Rumbo-Lorenzo, C., Mezo, M., 2007. Occurrence of Cryptosporidium parvum
and Giardia duodenalis in healthy adult domestic ruminants. Parasitol. Res.
101, 1443-1448.
Cavalcante, A.C., Teixeira, M., Monteiro, J.P., Lopes, C.W., 2011. Eimeria species in
dairy goats in Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. 183, 356-358.
Cavallero, S., Nadler, S.A., Paggi, L., Barros, N.B., D'Amelio, S., 2011. Molecular
characterization and phylogeny of anisakid nematodes from cetaceans from
southeastern Atlantic coasts of USA, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean Sea.
Parasitol. Res. 108, 781-792.
CDC, 2012. National centre for emerging and zoonotic infections diseases (Gorgia,
USA). http://www.cdc.gov/parasites/crypto/treatment.html (accessed 30 April
2013).
Chai, J.Y., Darwin Murrell, K., Lymbery, A.J., 2005. Fish-borne parasitic zoonoses: status
and issues. Int. J. Parasitol. 35, 1233-1254.
Chartier, C., Paraud, C., 2012. Coccidiosis due to Eimeria in sheep and goats, a review.
Small Rumin. Res. 103, 84-92.
Cheah, T.S., Rajamanickam, C., 1997. Epidemiology of gastro-intestinal nematodes of
sheep in wet tropical conditions in Malaysia. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 29, 165-
173.
Chen, Q., Yu, H.Q., Lun, Z.R., Chen, X.G., Song, H.Q., Lin, R.Q., Zhu, X.Q., 2008. Specific
PCR assays for the identification of common anisakid nematodes with zoonotic
potential. Parasitol. Res. 104, 79-84.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
191
Chen, X.M., Keithly, J.S., Paya, C.V., LaRusso, N.F., 2002. Cryptosporidiosis. N. Engl. J.
Med. 346, 1723-1731.
Chhabra, R.C., Pandey, V.S., 1991. Coccidia of goats in Zimbabwe. Vet. Parasitol. 39,
199-205.
Choi, S.J., Lee, J.C., Kim, M.J., Hur, G.Y., Shin, S.Y., Park, H.S., 2009. The clinical
characteristics of Anisakis allergy in Korea. Korean J. Intern. Med. 24, 160-163.
CIA 2012. The World Factbook: East & Southeast Asia: Papua New Guinea. Central
Intelligence Agency, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-
factbook/geos/pp.html (accessed 23 October 2012).
Cislakova, L., Halanova, M., Kovacova, D., Stefancikova, A., 2007. Occurrence of
antibodies against Chlamydophila abortus in sheep and goats in the Slovak
Republic. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 14, 243-245.
Clarkson, M.J., Philips, H.L., 1997. Isolation of faecal chlamydia from sheep in Britain
and their characterization by cultural properties. Vet. J. 153, 307-310.
Coles, G.C., 2006. Drug resistance and drug tolerance in parasites. Trends Parasitol. 22,
348-349.
Connelly, L., Craig, B.H., Jones, B., Alexander, C.L., 2013. Genetic diversity of
Cryptosporidium spp. within a remote population of Soay sheep on St. Kilda
Islands, Scotland. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 2240-2246.
Corner, L.A., Bagust, T.J. 1993. Australia standard diagnostic techniques for animal
diseases. Victoria, CSIRO.
Costa, G., Pontes, T., Mattiucci, S., D'Amelio, S., 2003. The occurrence and infection
dynamics of Anisakis larvae in the black-scabbard fish, Aphanopus carbo, chub
mackerel, Scomber japonicus, and oceanic horse mackerel, Trachurus picturatus
from Madeira, Portugal. J. Helminthol. 77, 163-166.
Current, W.L., Reese, N.C., Ernst, J.V., Bailey, W.S., Heyman, M.B., Weinstein, W.M.,
1983. Human cryptosporidiosis in immunocompetent and immunodeficient
persons. Studies of an outbreak and experimental transmission. N. Engl. J. Med.
308, 1252-1257.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
192
Czopowicz, M., Kaba, J., Szalus-Jordanow, O., Nowicki, M., Witkowski, L., Nowicka, D.,
Frymus, T., 2010. Prevalence of antibodies against Chlamydophila abortus and
Coxiella burnetii in goat herds in Poland. Polish J. Vet. Sci. 13, 175-179.
D'Amelio, S., Cavallero, S., Dronen, N.O., Barros, N.B., Paggi, L., 2011. Two new species
of Contracaecum Railliet & Henry, 1912 (Nematoda: Anisakidae), C. fagerholmi
n. sp. and C. rudolphii F from the brown pelican Pelecanus occidentalis in the
northern Gulf of Mexico. Syst. Parasitol. 81, 1-16.
D'Amelio, S., Mathiopoulos, K.D., Santos, C.P., Pugachev, O.N., Webb, S.C., Picanco, M.,
Paggi, L., 2000. Genetic markers in ribosomal DNA for the identification of
members of the genus Anisakis (Nematoda: ascaridoidea) defined by
polymerase-chain-reaction-based restriction fragment length polymorphism.
Int. J. Parasitol. 30, 223-226.
Dagnachew, S., Amaute, A., Temesgen, W., 2011. Epidemiology of gastrointestinal
helminthiasis of small ruminants in selected sites of North Gondar zone,
Northwest Ethiopia. Ethiop. Vet. J. 15, 57-68.
Dawson, D., 2005. Foodborne protozoan parasites. Int. J. Food. Microbiol. 103, 207-
227.
de Graaf, D.C., Vanopdenbosch, E., Ortega-Mora, L.M., Abbassi, H., Peeters, J.E., 1999.
A review of the importance of cryptosporidiosis in farm animals. Int. J.
Parasitol. 29, 1269-1287.
De Waele, V., Speybroeck, N., Berkvens, D., Mulcahy, G., Murphy, T.M., 2010. Control
of cryptosporidiosis in neonatal calves: use of halofuginone lactate in two
different calf rearing systems. Prev. Vet. Med. 96, 143-151.
Demeler, J., Ramunke, S., Wolken, S., Ianiello, D., Rinaldi, L., Gahutu, J.B., Cringoli, G.,
von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G., Krucken, J., 2013. Discrimination of
gastrointestinal nematode eggs from crude fecal egg preparations by inhibitor-
resistant conventional and real-time PCR. PloS one 8, e61285.
Diaz, P., Quilez, J., Chalmers, R.M., Panadero, R., Lopez, C., Sanchez-Acedo, C.,
Morrondo, P., Diez-Banos, P., 2010a. Genotype and subtype analysis of
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
193
Cryptosporidium isolates from calves and lambs in Galicia (NW Spain). Parasitol.
137, 1187-1193.
Diaz, P., Quilez, J., Robinson, G., Chalmers, R.M., Diez-Banos, P., Morrondo, P., 2010b.
Identification of Cryptosporidium xiaoi in diarrhoeic goat kids (Capra hircus) in
Spain. Vet. Parasitol. 172, 132-134.
Dittmar, K., Mundt, H.C., Grzonka, E., Daugschies, A., Bangoura, B., 2010. Ovine
coccidiosis in housed lambs in Saxony-Anhalt (central Germany). Berliner und
Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift 123, 49-57.
Dobell, C., 1920. The discovery of the intestinal protozoa of man. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med.
13, 1-15.
Dobson, R.J., Barnes, E.H., Birclijin, S.D., Gill, J.H., 1992. The survival of Ostertagia
circumcincta and Trichostrongylus colubriformis in faecal culture as a source of
bias in apportioning egg counts to worm species. Int. J. Parasitol. 22, 1005-
1008.
Dorny, P., Symoens, C., Jalila, A., Vercruysse, J., Sani, R., 1995. Strongyle infections in
sheep and goats under the traditional husbandry system in peninsular
Malaysia. Vet. Parasitol. 56, 121-136.
Dryden, M.W., Payne, P.A., Ridley, R., Smith, V., 2005. Comparison of common fecal
flotation techniques for the recovery of parasite eggs and oocysts. Vet. Ther. 6,
15-28.
Eb, F., Orfila, J., Lefebvre, J.F., 1976. Ultrastructural study of the development of the
agent of ewe's abortion. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 56, 177-185.
Edgar, R.C., 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high
throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792-1797.
Egerton, J.R., Rothwell, T.L.W., 1964. The distribution of infectious and parasitic
diseases of animals in Papua and New Guinea. Research Bulletin No. 1,
Veterinary Sciences Series, 1964, Department of Agriculture and Livestock, Port
Moresby. pp. 31.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
194
Egyed, Z., Sreter, T., Szell, Z., Varga, I., 2003. Characterization of Cryptosporidium spp.--
recent developments and future needs. Vet. Parasitol. 111, 103-114.
Elarifi, A.E., 1982. The histopathology of larval anisakid nematode infections in the liver
of whiting, Merlangius merlangus (L.), with some observations on blood
leucocytes of the fish. J. Fish Dis. 5, 411-419.
Entrican, G., Buxton, D., Longbottom, D., 2001. Chlamydial infection in sheep: immune
control versus fetal pathology. J. R. Soc. Med. 94, 273-277.
Entzeroth, R., Mattig, F.R., Werner-Meier, R., 1998. Structure and function of the
parasitophorous vacuole in Eimeria species. Int. J. Parasitol. 28, 1015-1018.
Escobedo, A.A., Cimerman, S., 2007. Giardiasis: a pharmacotherapy review. Expert
Opin. Pharmacother. 8, 1885-1902.
Everett, K.D., Bush, R.M., Andersen, A.A., 1999. Emended description of the order
Chlamydiales, proposal of Parachlamydiaceae fam. nov. and Simkaniaceae fam.
nov., each containing one monotypic genus, revised taxonomy of the family
Chlamydiaceae, including a new genus and five new species, and standards for
the identification of organisms. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 49 Pt 2, 415-440.
Eysker, M., 1997. Some aspects of inhibited development of trichostrongylids in
ruminants. Vet. Parasitol. 72, 265-272.
Eysker, M., Ploeger, H.W., 2000. Value of present diagnostic methods for
gastrointestinal nematode infections in ruminants. Parasitol. Suppl. 120 109-
119.
Faizal, A.C., Rajapakse, R.P., 2001. Prevalence of coccidia and gastrointestinal
nematode infections in cross bred goats in the dry areas of Sri Lanka. Small
Ruminant Res. 40, 233-238.
Farjallah, S., Busi, M., Mahjoub, M.O., Slimane, B.B., Paggi, L., Said, K., D'Amelio, S.,
2008a. Molecular characterization of larval anisakid nematodes from marine
fishes off the Moroccan and Mauritanian coasts. Parasitol. Int. 57, 430-436.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
195
Farjallah, S., Slimane, B.B., Busi, M., Paggi, L., Amor, N., Blel, H., Said, K., D'Amelio, S.,
2008b. Occurrence and molecular identification of Anisakis spp. from the North
African coasts of Mediterranean Sea. Parasitol. Res. 102, 371-379.
Fayer, R. 2008. The general biology of Cryptosporidum. Pp. 1-42 in Fayer, R., Xiao, L.
(Eds.) Cryptosporidium and Cryptosporidiosis. Boco Raton, FL., CRC Press.
Fayer, R., Ellis, W., 1993. Paromomycin is effective as prophylaxis for cryptosporidiosis
in dairy calves. J. Parasitol. 79, 771-774.
Fayer, R., Santin, M., 2009. Cryptosporidium xiaoi n. sp. (Apicomplexa:
Cryptosporidiidae) in sheep (Ovis aries). Vet. Parasitol. 164, 192-200.
Fayer, R., Santin, M., Macarisin, D., 2010. Cryptosporidium ubiquitum n. sp. in animals
and humans. Vet. Parasitol. 172, 23-32.
Fayer, R., Santin, M., Trout, J.M., 2008. Cryptosporidium ryanae n. sp. (Apicomplexa:
Cryptosporidiidae) in cattle (Bos taurus). Vet. Parasitol. 156, 191-198.
Fayer, R., Ungar, B.L., 1986. Cryptosporidium spp. and cryptosporidiosis. Microbiol.
Rev. 50, 458-483.
Felsenstein, J., 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the
bootstrap. Evol. 39, 783-791.
Feng, Y., Torres, E., Li, N., Wang, L., Bowman, D., Xiao, L., 2013. Population genetic
characterisation of dominant Cryptosporidium parvum subtype IIaA15G2R1. Int.
J. Parasitol. 43, 1141-1147.
Feng, Y., Xiao, L., 2011. Zoonotic potential and molecular epidemiology of Giardia
species and giardiasis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 24, 110-140.
Fiuza, V.R., Cosendey, R.I., Frazao-Teixeira, E., Santin, M., Fayer, R., de Oliveira, F.C.,
2011. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium in Brazilian sheep. Vet.
Parasitol. 175, 360-362.
Foreyt, W.J., 1990. Coccidiosis and cryptosporidiosis in sheep and goats. Vet. Clin. N.
Am. 6, 655-670.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
196
Fox, L.M., Saravolatz, L.D., 2005. Nitazoxanide: a new thiazolide antiparasitic agent.
Clin. Infect. Dis. 40, 1173-1180.
Franzen, C., Muller, A., 1999. Cryptosporidia and microsporidia--waterborne diseases
in the immunocompromised host. Diag. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 34, 245-262.
Frasser, C.M., Bergeron, J. A., Mays, A., Aiello, S.E. (Eds), 1991. The Merk veterinary
manual: A handbook of diagnosis, therapy and disease prevention and control
for veterinarian, 7th Ed. Rahway, N.J., Merck & Co., Inc, pp. Rahway, Nit, USA.
Fukushi, H., Hirai, K., 1992. Proposal of Chlamydia pecorum sp. nov. for Chlamydia
strains derived from ruminants. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 42, 306-308.
Gadahi, J.A., Arshed, M.J., Ali, Q., Javaid, S.B., Shah, S.I., 2009. Prevalence of
gastrointestinal parasites of sheep and goat in and around Rawallpindi and
Islamabad, Pakistan. Vet. World 2, 21-53.
Garcia, L.S., Shimizu, R.Y., Novak, S., Carroll, M., Chan, F., 2003. Commercial assay for
detection of Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium parvum antigens in human
fecal specimens by rapid solid-phase qualitative immunochromatography. J.
Clin. Microbiol. 41, 209-212.
Gardiner MA., 1990. Survival of Anisakis in cold smoked salmon. Can. Inst. Food Sci.
Technol. 23 (2/3): 143-4.
Gardiner, C.H., Fayer, R., Dubey, J.P., 1998. An atlas of protozoan parasites in animal
tissues, Washington D.C., US Department of Agriculture.
Gasser, R.B., Bott, N.J., Chilton, N.B., Hunt, P., Beveridge, I., 2008. Toward practical,
DNA-based diagnostic methods for parasitic nematodes of livestock-bionomic
and biotechnological implications. Biotechnol. Adv. 26, 325-334.
Geurden, T., Claerebout, E., Dursin, L., Deflandre, A., Bernay, F., Kaltsatos, V.,
Vercruysse, J., 2006a. The efficacy of an oral treatment with paromomycin
against an experimental infection with Giardia in calves. Vet. Parasitol. 135,
241-247.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
197
Geurden, T., Claerebout, E., Vercruysse, J., Berkvens, D., 2004. Estimation of diagnostic
test characteristics and prevalence of Giardia duodenalis in dairy calves in
Belgium using a Bayesian approach. Int. J. Parasitol. 34, 1121-1127.
Geurden, T., Geldhof, P., Levecke, B., Martens, C., Berkvens, D., Casaert, S., Vercruysse,
J., Claerebout, E., 2008a. Mixed Giardia duodenalis assemblage A and E
infections in calves. Int. J. Parasitol. 38, 259-264.
Geurden, T., Levecke, B., Caccio, S.M., Visser, A., De Groote, G., Casaert, S., Vercruysse,
J., Claerebout, E., 2009. Multilocus genotyping of Cryptosporidium and Giardia
in non-outbreak related cases of diarrhoea in human patients in Belgium.
Parasitol. 136, 1161-1168.
Geurden, T., Thomas, P., Casaert, S., Vercruysse, J., Claerebout, E., 2008b. Prevalence
and molecular characterisation of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in lambs and
goat kids in Belgium. Vet. Parasitol. 155, 142-145.
Geurden, T., Vandenhoute, E., Pohle, H., Casaert, S., De Wilde, N., Vercruysse, J.,
Claerebout, E., 2010a. The effect of a fenbendazole treatment on cyst excretion
and weight gain in calves experimentally infected with Giardia duodenalis. Vet.
Parasitol. 169, 18-23.
Geurden, T., Vercruysse, J., Claerebout, E., 2006b. Field testing of a fenbendazole
treatment combined with hygienic and management measures against a
natural Giardia infection in calves. Vet. Parasitol. 142, 367-371.
Geurden, T., Vercruysse, J., Claerebout, E., 2010b. Is Giardia a significant pathogen in
production animals? Exp. Parasitol. 124, 98-106.
Ghoneim, N.H., Abdel-Moein, K.A., Saeed, H., 2011. Fish as a possible reservoir for
zoonotic Giardia duodenalis assemblages. Parasitol. Res. 110, 2193-2196.
Giangaspero, A., Paoletti, B., Iorio, R., Traversa, D., 2005. Prevalence and molecular
characterization of Giardia duodenalis from sheep in central Italy. Parasitol.
Res. 96, 32-37.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
198
Gibson-Kueh, S., Yang, R., Thuy, N.T., Jones, J.B., Nicholls, P.K., Ryan, U., 2011. The
molecular characterization of an Eimeria and Cryptosporidium detected in Asian
seabass (Lates calcarifer) cultured in Vietnam. Vet. Parasitol. 181, 91-96.
Giles, M., Chalmers, R., Pritchard, G., Elwin, K., Mueller-Doblies, D., Clifton-Hadley, F.,
2009. Cryptosporidium hominis in a goat and a sheep in the UK. Vet. Rec. 164,
24-25.
Goma, F.Y., Geurden, T., Siwila, J., Phiri, I.G.K., Claerebout, E., Vercruysse, J., 2007. The
prevalence and molecular characterisation of Cryptosporidium spp. in small
ruminants in Zambia. Small Ruminant Res. 72, 77-80.
Gomez-Munoz, M.T., Navarro, C., Garijo-Toledo, M.M., Dea-Ayuela, M.A., Fernandez-
Barredo, S., Perez-Gracia, M.T., Dominguez-Marquez, M.V., Borras, R., 2009.
Occurrence and genotypes of Giardia isolated from lambs in Spain. Parasitol.
Int. 58, 297-299.
Greub, G., 2010. International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes.
Subcommittee on the taxonomy of the Chlamydiae: minutes of the closed
meeting, 21 June 2010, Hof bei Salzburg, Austria. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 60,
2694.
Grieg, J.R., 1936. Enzootic abortion in ewes. A pleminary note. Vet. Rec. 48, 1225-1232.
Groves, V.J., Lehmann, D., Gilbert, G.L., 1994. Seroepidemiology of cryptosporidiosis in
children in Papua New Guinea and Australia. Epidemiol. Infect. 113, 491-499.
Gupta, R.P., Yadav, C.L., Chaudhri, S.S., 1987. Epidemiology of gastrointestinal
nematodes of sheep and goats in Haryana, India. Vet. Parasitol. 24, 117-127.
Halberstädter, L., von Prowazek, S., 1907a. Über Zelleinschlüsse parasitärer Natur beim
Trachom. Arbeiten aus dem Kaiserlichen Gesundheitsamte 26.
Halberstädter, L., Von Prowazek, S., 1907b. Zur Aetiologie des Trachoms. Deutsche
Medizinische Wochenschrift 33, 1285-1287.
Harmon, A.F., Williams, Z.B., Holler, L.D., Hildreth, M.B., 2007a. Comparison of three
different preservatives for morphological and real-time PCR analyses of
Haemonchus contortus eggs. Vet. Parasitol. 145, 361-365.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
199
Harmon, A.F., Williams, Z.B., Zarlenga, D.S., Hildreth, M.B., 2007b. Real-time PCR for
quantifying Haemonchus contortus eggs and potential limiting factors.
Parasitol. Res. 101, 71-76.
Harmon, A.F., Zarlenga, D.S., Hildreth, M.B., 2006. Improved methods for isolating DNA
from Ostertagia ostertagi eggs in cattle feces. Vet. Parasitol. 135, 297-302.
Harper, C.K., Penzhorn, B.L., 1999. Occurrence and diversity of coccidia in indigenous,
Saanen and crossbred goats in South Africa. Vet. Parasitol. 82, 1-9.
Hauck A.K., 1977. Occurrence and survival of the larval nematode Anisakis sp. in the
flesh of fresh, frozen, brined, and smoked pacific herring, Clupea harengus
pallasi. J. Parasitol. 63 (3): 515-9.
Hauck, A.K., May, E.B., 1977. Histopathologic alterations associated with Anisakis
larvae in Pacific herring from Oregon. J. Wildl. Dis. 13, 290-293.
Heckmann, O., 1985. Occurrence of anisakid larvae (Nematoda: Ascardidia) in fishes
from Alaska and Idaho. West. N. Am. Naturalist 45, 427-431.
Helmy, Y.A., Krucken, J., Nockler, K., von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G., Zessin, K.H., 2013.
Molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium in livestock animals and humans in
the Ismailia province of Egypt. Vet. Parasitol. 193, 15-24.
Hepworth, K., Neary, M., Hutchinson, T. 2010. Managing internal parasitism in sheep
and goats. Kentucky, US, University of Kentucky, pp. 1-10.
Herring, A.J., Anderson, I.E., McClenaghan, M., Inglis, N.F., Williams, H., Matheson,
B.A., West, C.P., Rodger, M., Brettle, P.P., 1987. Restriction endonuclease
analysis of DNA from two isolates of Chlamydia psittaci obtained from human
abortions. Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.) 295, 1239.
Herrmann, B., Rahman, R., Bergstrom, S., Bonnedahl, J., Olsen, B., 2000. Chlamydophila
abortus in a Brown skua (Catharacta antarctica lonnbergi) from a subantarctic
island. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 3654-3656.
Hills, D., M., Bull, J., J., 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for
assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42, 182-192.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
200
Hochberg, N.S., Hamer, D.H., 2010. Anisakidosis: Perils of the deep. Clin. Infect. Dis. 51,
806-812.
Hoorfar, J., Cook, N., Malorny, B., Wagner, M., De Medici, D., Abdulmawjood, A., Fach,
P., 2003. Making internal amplification control mandatory for diagnostic PCR. J.
Clin. Microbiol. 41, 5835.
Hoste, H., Torres-Acosta, J.F., Aguilar-Caballero, A.J., 2008. Nutrition-parasite
interactions in goats: is immunoregulation involved in the control of
gastrointestinal nematodes? Parasite Immunol. 30, 79-88.
Hurst, R.J., 1984. Identification and description of larval Anisakis simplex and
Pseudoterranova decipiens (Anisakidae: Nematoda) from New Zealand waters.
New Zeal. J. Mar. Fresh. Res. 18, 177-186.
Igua, P.B.K. 2001. Food security strategies for Papua New Guinea. The CGPRT centre,
working paper No. 56, pp. 50-52.
Imre, K., Luca, C., Costache, M., Sala, C., Morar, A., Morariu, S., Ilie, M.S., Imre, M.,
Darabus, G., 2013. Zoonotic Cryptosporidium parvum in Romanian newborn
lambs (Ovis aries). Vet. Parasitol. 191, 119-122.
Iniguez, A.M., Santos, C.P., Vicente, A.C., 2009. Genetic characterization of Anisakis
typica and Anisakis physeteris from marine mammals and fish from the Atlantic
Ocean off Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. 165, 350-356.
Iqbal, A., Lim, Y.A., Surin, J., Sim, B.L., 2012. High diversity of Cryptosporidium
subgenotypes identified in Malaysian HIV/AIDS individuals targeting gp60 gene.
PloS one 7, e31139.
Jee, J., Degraves, F.J., Kim, T., Kaltenboeck, B., 2004. High prevalence of natural
Chlamydophila species infection in calves. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42, 5664-5672.
Johnson, D.A., Behnke, J.M., Coles, G.C., 2004. Copro-antigen capture ELISA for the
detection of Teladorsagia (Ostertagia) circumcincta in sheep: improvement of
specificity by heat treatment. Parasitol. 129, 115-126.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
201
Johnson, E.H., Windsor, J.J., Muirhead, D.E., King, G.J., Al-Busaidy, R., 2000.
Confirmation of the prophylactic value of paromomycin in a natural outbreak of
caprine cryptosporidiosis. Vet. Res. Commun. 24, 63-67.
Johnson, M.J., Behnke, J.M., Coles, G.C., 1996. Detection of gastrointestinal nematodes
by a coproantigen capture ELISA. Res. Vet. Sci. 60, 7-12.
Jones, G.E., 1995. Chlamydia psittaci: prevailing problems in pathogenesis. Brit. Vet. J.
151, 115-118.
Jones, G.E., Anderson, I.E., 1988. Chlamydia psittaci: is tonsillar tissue the portal of
entry in ovine enzootic abortion? Res. Vet. Sci. 44, 260-261.
Jorgensen, D.M., 1997. Gestational psittacosis in a Montana sheep rancher. Emerg.
Infect. Dis. 3, 191-194.
Kaminsky, R., Gauvry, N., Schorderet Weber, S., Skripsky, T., Bouvier, J., Wenger, A.,
Schroeder, F., Desaules, Y., Hotz, R., Goebel, T., Hosking, B.C., Pautrat, F.,
Wieland-Berghausen, S., Ducray, P., 2008. Identification of the amino-
acetonitrile derivative monepantel (AAD 1566) as a new anthelmintic drug
development candidate. Parasitol. Res. 103, 931-939.
Kampinga, G.A., Schroder, F.P., Visser, I.J., Anderson, J.M., Buxton, D., Moller, A.V.,
2000. Lambing ewes as a source of severe psittacosis in a pregnant woman.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 144, 2500-2504.
Kanyari, P.W., 1993. The relationship between coccidial and helminth infections in
sheep and goats in Kenya. Vet. Parasitol. 51, 137-141.
Kanyari, P.W.N., Kagira, J.M., Mhoma, R.J., 2009. Prevalence and intensity of
endoparasites in small ruminants kept by farmers in Kisumu Municipality,
Kenya. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 21 (11).
Karanis, P., Plutzer, J., Halim, N.A., Igori, K., Nagasawa, H., Ongerth, J., Liqing, M., 2007.
Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium from animal sources in Qinghai
province of China. Parasitol. Res. 101, 1575-1580.
Kerr, K., Entrican, G., McKeever, D., Longbottom, D., 2005. Immunopathology of
Chlamydophila abortus infection in sheep and mice. Res. Vet. Sci. 78, 1-7.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
202
Khan, M.N., Sajid, M.S., Khan, M.K., Iqbal, Z., Hussain, A., 2010. Gastrointestinal
helminthiasis: prevalence and associated determinants in domestic ruminants
of district Toba Tek Singh, Punjab, Pakistan. Parasitol. Res. 107, 787-794.
Kijewska, A., Dzido, J., Rokicki, J., 2009a. Mitochondrial DNA of Anisakis simplex s.s. as
a potential tool for differentiating populations. J. Parasitol. 95, 1364-1370.
Kijewska, A., Dzido, J., Shukhgalter, O., Rokicki, J., 2009b. Anisakid parasites of fishes
caught on the African shelf. J. Parasitol. 95, 639-645.
Kim S.G., Jo, Y.J., Park, Y.S., Kim S.H., Song, M.H., Lee, H.H., Kim, J.S., Ryou, J.W., Joo,
J.E., Kim, D.H., 2006. Four cases of gastric submucosal mass suspected as
anisakiasis. Korean J. Parasitol. 2006; 44 (1): 81-86.
Kimura, M., 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base
substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol.
Evol. 16, 111-120.
Kotloff, K.L., Nataro, J.P., Blackwelder, W.C., Nasrin, D., Farag, T.H., Panchalingam, S.,
Wu, Y., Sow, S.O., Sur, D., Breiman, R.F., Faruque, A.S., Zaidi, A.K., Saha, D.,
Alonso, P.L., Tamboura, B., Sanogo, D., Onwuchekwa, U., Manna, B.,
Ramamurthy, T., Kanungo, S., Ochieng, J.B., Omore, R., Oundo, J.O., Hossain, A.,
Das, S.K., Ahmed, S., Qureshi, S., Quadri, F., Adegbola, R.A., Antonio, M.,
Hossain, M.J., Akinsola, A., Mandomando, I., Nhampossa, T., Acacio, S., Biswas,
K., O'Reilly, C.E., Mintz, E.D., Berkeley, L.Y., Muhsen, K., Sommerfelt, H., Robins-
Browne, R.M., Levine, M.M., 2013. Burden and aetiology of diarrhoeal disease
in infants and young children in developing countries (the Global Enteric
Multicenter Study, GEMS): a prospective, case-control study. Lancet 382, 209-
222.
Koudela, B., Bokova, A., 1998. Coccidiosis in goats in the Czech Republic. Vet. Parasitol.
76, 261-267.
Kuhn, T., Garcia-Marquez, J., Klimpel, S., 2011. Adaptive radiation within marine
anisakid nematodes: a zoogeographical modeling of cosmopolitan, zoonotic
parasites. PloS one 6, e28642.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
203
Kusilukaa, L.J.M., Kambaragea, D.M., Matthewmanb, R.W., Harrisonb, L.J.S., Dabornb,
C.J., 1996. Coccidiosis of small ruminants in Tanzania. Small Ruminant Res. 21,
127-131.
Kyriazakis, I., Houdijk, J., 2006. Immunonutrition: Nutritional control of parasites. Small
Ruminant Res. 62, 79-82.
Lalle, M., Jimenez-Cardosa, E., Caccio, S.M., Pozio, E., 2005a. Genotyping of Giardia
duodenalis from humans and dogs from Mexico using a beta-giardin nested
polymerase chain reaction assay. J. Parasitol. 91, 203-205.
Lalle, M., Pozio, E., Capelli, G., Bruschi, F., Crotti, D., Caccio, S.M., 2005b. Genetic
heterogeneity at the beta-giardin locus among human and animal isolates of
Giardia duodenalis and identification of potentially zoonotic subgenotypes. Int.
J. Parasitol. 35, 207-213.
Lamb, W., 1859. Mikroskopische untersuchungen der Darmexcrete. Vierteljahrsschr.
Prakst. Heikunde 61, 1-58.
Landsberg, J.H., Paperna, I., 1986. Ultrastructural study of the coccidian
Cryptosporidium sp. from stomachs of juvenile cichlid fish. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 2,
13-20.
Larsen, R.H., Christensen, C.M., Lind, P., 1997. Serological assays for the identification
of Oesophagostomum dentatum infections in pigs. Res. Vet. Sci. 63, 5-10.
Lasek-Nesselquist, E., Welch, D.M., Sogin, M.L., 2010. The identification of a new
Giardia duodenalis assemblage in marine vertebrates and a preliminary analysis
of G. duodenalis population biology in marine systems. Int. J. Parasitol. 40,
1063-1074.
Lauwaet, T., Davids, B.J., Reiner, D.S., Gillin, F.D., 2007. Encystation of Giardia lamblia:
a model for other parasites. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 10, 554-559.
Le Jambre, L.F., 2006. Eradication of targeted species of internal parasites. Vet.
Parasitol. 139, 360-370.
Learmount, J., Conyers, C., Hird, H., Morgan, C., Craig, B.H., von Samson-
Himmelstjerna, G., Taylor, M., 2009. Development and validation of real-time
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
204
PCR methods for diagnosis of Teladorsagia circumcincta and Haemonchus
contortus in sheep. Vet. Parasitol. 166, 268-274.
Leclerc, H., Schwartzbrod, L., Dei-Cas, E., 2002. Microbial agents associated with
waterborne diseases. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 28, 371-409.
Lee, J.H., Lee, J., Park, S.J., Yong, T.S., Hwang, U.W., 2006. Detection and genotyping of
Giardia intestinalis isolates using intergenic spacers (IGS)-based PCR. Korean J.
Parasitol. 44, 343-353.
Lenzko, H., Moog, U., Henning, K., Lederbach, R., Diller, R., Menge, C., Sachse, K.,
Sprague, L.D., 2011. High frequency of chlamydial co-infections in clinically
healthy sheep flocks. BMC Vet. Res. 7, 29.
Levine, W.C., Stephenson, W.T., Craun, G.F., 1990. Waterborne disease outbreaks,
1986-1988. MMWR Surveill. Summ. 39, 1-13.
Li, N., Xiao, L., Alderisio, K., Elwin, K., Cebelinski, E., Chalmers, R., Santin, M., Fayer, R.,
Kvac, M., Ryan, U., Sak, B., Stanko, M., Guo, Y., Wang, L., Zhang, L., Cai, J.,
Roellig, D., Feng, Y., 2014. Subtyping Cryptosporidium ubiquitum, a zoonotic
pathogen emerging in humans. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 20, 217-224.
Lichtenfels, J.R., Hoberg, E.P., 1993. The systematics of nematodes that cause
ostertagiasis in domestic and wild ruminants in North America: an update and a
key to species. Vet. Parasitol. 46, 33-53.
Lichtenfels, J.R., Hoberg, E.P., Zarlenga, D.S., 1997. Systematics of gastrointestinal
nematodes of domestic ruminants: advances between 1992 and 1995 and
proposals for future research. Vet. Parasitol. 72, 225-238.
Lim, Y.A., Mahdy, M.A., Tan, T.K., Goh, X.T., Jex, A.R., Nolan, M.J., Sharma, R.S., Gasser,
R.B., 2013. First molecular characterization of Giardia duodenalis from goats in
Malaysia. Mol. Cell. Probes 27, 28-31.
Lindsay, D.S., Todd Jnr., K.S. 1993. Coccidia of mammals, pp. 89-131 in Parasitic
protozoa. New York, Academic Press.
Longbottom, D., Fairley, S., Chapman, S., Psarrou, E., Vretou, E., Livingstone, M., 2002.
Serological diagnosis of ovine enzootic abortion by enzyme-linked
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
205
immunosorbent assay with a recombinant protein fragment of the polymorphic
outer membrane protein POMP90 of Chlamydophila abortus. J. Clin. Microbiol.
40, 4235-4243.
Love, S.C.J., Hutchinson, G.W., 2003. Pathology and diagnosis of internal parasites in
ruminants, pp. 309-338 in Gross Pathology of Ruminants, Proceedings 350, Post
Graduate Foundation in Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Sydney,
Australia, 309-338.
Lv, C., Zhang, L., Wang, R., Jian, F., Zhang, S., Ning, C., Wang, H., Feng, C., Wang, X.,
Ren, X., Qi, M., Xiao, L., 2009. Cryptosporidium spp. in wild, laboratory, and pet
rodents in china: prevalence and molecular characterization. Appl. Environ.
Microbiol. 75, 7692-7699.
Lymbery, A.J., Cheah, F.Y. 2007. Anisakid nematode and anisakiasis, pp. 185-207 in
Murrell, K.D., Fried, B. (Eds.) Food-borne parasitic zoonoses: fish and plant-
borne parasites. New York, Springer.
Macfarlane, D. 2000. Country pasture/forage resource profiles Papua New Guinea FAO
database. Available online at www.fao.org/ag/AGP/AGPC/doc/Counprof/south
pacific/png.htm (accessed 5 January 2012).
Maichomo, M.W., Kagira, J.M., Walker, T., 2004. The point prevalence of
gastrointestinal parasites in calves, sheep and goats in Magadi division, south-
western Kenya. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 71, 257-261.
Maingi, N., Munyua, W.K., 1994. The prevalence and intensity of infection with Eimeria
species in sheep in Nyandarua district of Kenya. Vet. Res. Commun. 18, 19-25.
Marques, J.F., Cabral, H.N., Busi, M., D'Amelio, S., 2006. Molecular identification of
Anisakis species from Pleuronectiformes off the Portuguese coast. J.
Helminthol. 80, 47-51.
Marti, M., Li, Y., Schraner, E.M., Wild, P., Kohler, P., Hehl, A.B., 2003. The secretory
apparatus of an ancient eukaryote: protein sorting to separate export pathways
occurs before formation of transient Golgi-like compartments. Mol. Biol. Cell
14, 1433-1447.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
206
Masala, G., Porcu, R., Daga, C., Denti, S., Canu, G., Patta, C., Tola, S., 2007. Detection of
pathogens in ovine and caprine abortion samples from Sardinia, Italy, by PCR. J
Vet. Diagn. Invest. 19, 96-98.
Matsumoto, A., 1973. Fine structures of cell envelopes of Chlamydia organisms as
revealed by freeze-etching and negative staining techniques. J. Bacteriol. 116,
1355-1363.
Matsumoto, A., 1982. Electron microscopic observations of surface projections on
Chlamydia psittaci reticulate bodies. J. Bacteriol. 150, 358-364.
Mattiucci, S., Cianchi, R., Nascetti, G., Paggi, L., Sardella, N., Timi, J., Webb, S.C.,
Bastida, R., Rodriguez, D., Bullini, L., 2003. Genetic evidence for two sibling
species within Contracaecum ogmorhini Johnston & Mawson, 1941 (Nematoda:
Anisakidae) from otariid seals of boreal and austral regions. Syst. Parasitol. 54,
13-23.
Mattiucci, S., Nascetti, G., 2006. Molecular systematics, phylogeny and ecology of
anisakid nematodes of the genus Anisakis Dujardin, 1845: an update. Parasite
13, 99-113.
Mattiucci, S., Nascetti, G., 2008. Advances and trends in the molecular systematics of
anisakid nematodes, with implications for their evolutionary ecology and host-
parasite co-evolutionary processes. Adv. Parasitol. 66, 47-148.
Mattiucci, S., Paggi, L., Nascetti, G., Portes Santos, C., Costa, G., Di Beneditto, A.P.,
Ramos, R., Argyrou, M., Cianchi, R., Bullini, L., 2002. Genetic markers in the
study of Anisakis typica (Diesing, 1860): larval identification and genetic
relationships with other species of Anisakis Dujardin, 1845 (Nematoda:
Anisakidae). Syst. Parasitol. 51, 159-170.
Mattiucci, S., Paoletti, M., Borrini, F., Palumbo, M., Palmieri, R.M., Gomes, V., Casati,
A., Nascetti, G., 2011. First molecular identification of the zoonotic parasite
Anisakis pegreffii (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in a paraffin-embedded granuloma
taken from a case of human intestinal anisakiasis in Italy. BMC Infect. Dis. 11,
82.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
207
Mattiucci, S., Paoletti, M., Webb, S.C., 2009. Anisakis nascettii n. sp. (Nematoda:
Anisakidae) from beaked whales of the southern hemisphere: morphological
description, genetic relationships between congeners and ecological data. Syst.
Parasitol. 74, 199-217.
McDonald, V., Shirley, M.W., 2009. Past and future: vaccination against Eimeria.
Parasitol. 136, 1477-1489.
McDougald, L.R., 1979. Attempted cross-transmission of coccidia between sheep and
goats and description of Eimeria ovinoidalis sp. n. J. Protozool. 26, 109-113.
McLeod, R.S., 1995. Costs of major parasites to the Australian livestock industries. Int.
J. Parasitol. 25, 1363-1367.
McNally, J., Callan, D., Andronicos, N., Bott, N., Hunt, P.W., 2013. DNA-based
methodology for the quantification of gastrointestinal nematode eggs in sheep
faeces. Vet. Parasitol. 198, 325-335.
McNutt, S.H., 1940. A preliminary report on an infectious encephalomyelitis of cattle.
Vet. Med. 35, 228.
Meireles, M.V., de Oliveira, F.P., Teixeira, W.F., Coelho, W.M., Mendes, L.C., 2011.
Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy calves from the
state of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Parasitol. Res. 109, 949-951.
Mi, R., Wang, X., Li, C., Huang, Y., Zhou, P., Li, Z., Lei, M., Cai, J., Chen, Z., 2013.
Prevalence and genetic characterization of Cryptosporidium in yaks in Qinghai
Province of China. PloS one 8, e74985.
Mohamad, K.Y., Rodolakis, A., 2010. Recent advances in the understanding of
Chlamydophila pecorum infections, sixteen years after it was named as the
fourth species of the Chlamydiaceae family. Vet. Res. 41, 27.
Monis, P.T., Caccio, S.M., Thompson, R.C., 2009. Variation in Giardia: towards a
taxonomic revision of the genus. Trends. Parasitol. 25, 93-100.
Morgan, U.M., Constantine, C.C., Forbes, D.A., Thompson, R.C., 1997. Differentiation
between human and animal isolates of Cryptosporidium parvum using rDNA
sequencing and direct PCR analysis. J. Parasitol. 83, 825-830.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
208
Morgan, U.M., Xiao, L., Hill, B.D., O'Donoghue, P., Limor, J., Lal, A., Thompson, R.C.,
2000. Detection of the Cryptosporidium parvum "human" genotype in a dugong
(Dugong dugon). J. Parasitol. 86, 1352-1354.
Morine, M., Yang, R., Ng, J., Kueh, S., Lymbery, A.J., Ryan, U.M., 2012. Additional novel
Cryptosporidium genotypes in ornamental fishes. Vet. Parasitol. 190, 578-582.
Moschella, C.M., Mattiucci, S., Mingazzini, P., Mongardini, M., Chein, A., Miccolis, D.,
Modini, C., 2005. Intestinal anisakiasis in Italy: a case treated by emergency
surgery. G. Chir. 26, 201-205.
Moulder, J.W., 1991. Interaction of chlamydiae and host cells in vitro. Microbiol. Rev.
55, 143-190.
Mueller-Doblies, D., Giles, M., Elwin, K., Smith, R.P., Clifton-Hadley, F.A., Chalmers,
R.M., 2008. Distribution of Cryptosporidium species in sheep in the UK. Vet.
Parasitol. 154, 214-219.
Murphy, B.G., Bradway, D., Walsh, T., Sanders, G.E., Snekvik, K., 2009. Gastric
cryptosporidiosis in freshwater angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare). J. Vet. Diagn.
Invest. 21, 722-727.
Murphy, T.M., Berzano, M., O'Keeffe, S.M., Cotter, D.M., McEvoy, S.E., Thomas, K.A.,
Maoileidigh, N.P., Whelan, K.F., 2010. Anisakid larvae in Atlantic salmon (Salmo
salar L.) grilse and post-smolts: molecular identification and histopathology. J.
Parasitol. 96, 77-82.
Nadler, S.A., Hoberg, E.P., Hudspeth, D.S., Rickard, L.G., 2000. Relationships of
Nematodirus species and Nematodirus battus isolates (Nematoda:
Trichostrongyloidea) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. J. Parasitol.
86, 588-601.
Nadler, S.A., Hudspeth, D.S., 2000. Phylogeny of the Ascaridoidea (Nematoda:
Ascaridida) based on three genes and morphology: hypotheses of structural
and sequence evolution. J. Parasitol. 86, 380-393.
Nakaji, K., 2009. Enteric anisakiasis which improved with conservative treatment.
Intern. Med. 48, 573.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
209
Nei, M., Kumar, S., 2000. Molecular Evolutionary and Phylogenetics. Oxford University
Press, New York.
Nei, M., Zhang, J., 2006. Evolutionary distance: estimation. Encyclopedia of Life Sci., 1-
3, available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npg.els.0005108 (accessed 12 October
2011).
Ng-Hublin, J.S., Singleton, G.R., Ryan, U., 2013. Molecular characterization of
Cryptosporidium spp. from wild rats and mice from rural communities in the
Philippines. Infect. Genet. Evol. 16, 5-12.
Ng, J., Eastwood, K., Durrheim, D., Massey, P., Walker, B., Armson, A., Ryan, U., 2008.
Evidence supporting zoonotic transmission of Cryptosporidium in rural New
South Wales. Exp. Parasitol. 119, 192-195.
Ng, J., Pavlasek, I., Ryan, U., 2006. Identification of novel Cryptosporidium genotypes
from avian hosts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 7548-7553.
Nikolaou, S., Gasser, R.B., 2006. Prospects for exploring molecular developmental
processes in Haemonchus contortus. Int. J. Parasitol. 36, 859-868.
Norton, C.C., 1986. Coccidia of the domestic goat Capra hircus, with notes on Eimeria
ovinoidalis and E. bakuensis (syn. E. ovina) from the sheep Ovis aries. Parasitol.
92 (2), 279-289.
Nuvor, S.V., Agyei, A.D., Assoku, R.K., 1998. Oocyst counts in crossbred ewes under
tree-crop plantation in the forest zone of Ghana. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 30,
279-285.
Nwosu, C.O., Madu, P.P., Richards, W.S., 2007. Prevalence and seasonal changes in the
population of gastrointestinal nematodes of small ruminants in the semi-arid
zone of north-eastern Nigeria. Vet. Parasitol. 144, 118-124.
O'Connor, L.J., Walkden-Brown, S.W., Kahn, L.P., 2006. Ecology of the free-living stages
of major trichostrongylid parasites of sheep. Vet. Parasitol. 142, 1-15.
O'Donoghue, P.J., 1995. Cryptosporidium and cryptosporidiosis in man and animals.
Int. J. Parasitol. 25, 139-195.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
210
O'Handley, R.M., Buret, A.G., McAllister, T.A., Jelinski, M., Olson, M.E., 2001. Giardiasis
in dairy calves: effects of fenbendazole treatment on intestinal structure and
function. Int. J. Parasitol. 31, 73-79.
O'Handley, R.M., Cockwill, C., Jelinski, M., McAllister, T.A., Olson, M.E., 2000. Effects of
repeat fenbendazole treatment in dairy calves with giardiosis on cyst excretion,
clinical signs and production. Vet. Parasitol. 89, 209-218.
O'Handley, R.M., Cockwill, C., McAllister, T.A., Jelinski, M., Morck, D.W., Olson, M.E.,
1999. Duration of naturally acquired giardiosis and cryptosporidiosis in dairy
calves and their association with diarrhea. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 214, 391-
396.
O'Handley, R.M., Olson, M.E., McAllister, T.A., Morck, D.W., Jelinski, M., Royan, G.,
Cheng, K.J., 1997. Efficacy of fenbendazole for treatment of giardiasis in calves.
Am. J. Vet. Res. 58, 384-388.
Olson, A.C., Jr., Lewis, M.D., Hauser, M.L., 1983. Proper identification of anisakine
worms. Am. J. Med. Technol. 49, 111-114.
Olson, M.E., McAllister, T.A., Deselliers, L., Morck, D.W., Cheng, K.J., Buret, A.G., Ceri,
H., 1995. Effects of giardiasis on production in a domestic ruminant (lamb)
model. Am. J. Vet. Res. 56, 1470-1474.
Ortega, Y.R., Adam, R.D., 1997. Giardia: overview and update. Clin Infect Dis 25, 545-
550.
Oshima, T., 1972. Anisakis and anisakiasis in Japan and adjacent area. Prog. Med.
Parasitol. JPN. 4, 301-393.
Osman, K.M., Ali, H.A., ElJakee, J.A., Galal, H.M., 2011. Chlamydophila psittaci and
Chlamydophila pecorum infections in goats and sheep in Egypt. Rev. Sci. Tech.
30, 939-948.
Owen, I.L., 1988. Field trials with closantel and Haemonchus contortus in sheep in
Papua New Guinea. Aust. Vet. J. 65, 267-270.
Owen, I.L., 1989. The epidemiology of fasciolosis in Papua New Guinea. Aust. Vet. J. 66,
58-60.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
211
Owen, I.L., 1998. A study of the contamination of sheep pasture with nematode larvae
in the highlands of Papua New Guinea. Sci. New Guinea. 24, 3-9.
Owen, I.L., 2005. Parasitic zoonoses in Papua New Guinea. J. Helminthol. 79, 1-14.
Pacios, E., Arias-Diaz, J., Zuloaga, J., Gonzalez-Armengol, J., Villarroel, P., Balibrea, J.L.,
2005. Albendazole for the treatment of anisakiasis ileus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 41,
1825-1826.
Palenzuela, O., Alvarez-Pellitero, P., Sitja-Bobadilla, A., 2010. Molecular
characterization of Cryptosporidium molnari reveals a distinct piscine clade.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 7646-7649.
Palm, H.W., Damriyasa, I.M., Oka, L., Oka, I.B.M., 2008. Molecular genotyping of
Anisakis Dujardin, 1845 (Nematoda: Ascaridoidea: Anisakidae) larvae from
marine fish of Balinese and Javanese waters, Indonesia. Helminthologia 45, 3-
12.
Panciera, R.J., Thomassen, R.W., Garner, F.M., 1971. Cryptosporidial infection in a calf.
Vet. Path 8, 479-484.
Paoletti, B., Giangaspero, A., Gatti, A., Iorio, R., Cembalo, D., Milillo, P., Traversa, D.,
2009. Immunoenzymatic analysis and genetic detection of Cryptosporidium
parvum in lambs from Italy. Exp. Parasitol. 122, 349-352.
Paparini, A., Jackson, B., Ward, S., Young, S., Ryan, U.M., 2012. Multiple
Cryptosporidium genotypes detected in wild black rats (Rattus rattus) from
northern Australia. Exp. Parasitol. 131, 404-412.
Paperna, I., Vilenkin, M., 1996. Cryptosporiodiosis in the gourami Trichogaster leeri:
description of a new species and proposal for a new genus, Piscicrytosporidium,
for species infection fish. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 27, 95-101.
Paz, E.S.F.M., Lopes, R.S., Bresciani, K.D., Amarante, A.F., Araujo, J.P., Jr., 2014. High
occurrence of Cryptosporidium ubiquitum and Giardia duodenalis genotype E in
sheep from Brazil. Acta Parasitol. 59, 193-196.
Peng, M.M., Matos, O., Gatei, W., Das, P., Stantic-Pavlinic, M., Bern, C., Sulaiman, I.M.,
Glaberman, S., Lal, A.A., Xiao, L., 2001. A comparison of Cryptosporidium
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
212
subgenotypes from several geographic regions. J. Euk. Microbiol. Suppl, 28S-
31S.
Petermann, J., Paraud, C., Pors, I., Chartier, C., 2014. Efficacy of halofuginone lactate
against experimental cryptosporidiosis in goat neonates. Vet. Parasitol. In
Press.
Pieniazek, N.J., Slemenda, S.B., da Silva, A.J., Alfano, E.M., Arrowood, M.J., 1996. PCR
confirmation of infection with Cyclospora cayetanensis. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2,
357-359.
Pinheiro Junior, J.W., Mota, R.A., Piatti, R.M., Oliveira, A.A., da Silva, A.M., de Oliveira
Abreu, S.R., Anderlini, G.A., Valenca, R.M., 2010. Seroprevalence of antibodies
to Chlamydophila abortus in Ovine in the State of Alagoas, Brazil. Braz. J.
Microbiol. 41, 358-364.
Plaunt, M.R., Hatch, T.P., 1988. Protein synthesis early in the developmental cycle of
Chlamydia psittaci. Infect. Immun. 56, 3021-3025.
Pontes, T., D'Amelio, S., Costa, G., Paggi, L., 2005. Molecular characterization of larval
anisakid nematodes from marine fishes of Madeira by a PCR-based approach,
with evidence for a new species. J. Parasitol. 91, 1430-1434.
Pospischil, A., Thoma, R., Hilbe, M., Grest, P., Gebbers, J.O., 2002. Abortion in woman
caused by caprine Chlamydophila abortus (Chlamydia psittaci serovar 1). Swiss
Med. Wkly. 132, 64-66.
Power, M.L., Richter, C., Emery, S., Hufschmid, J., Gillings, M.R., 2009. Eimeria
trichosuri: phylogenetic position of a marsupial coccidium, based on 18S rDNA
sequences. Exp. Parasitol. 122, 165-168.
Quartermain, A.R. 2004a. Conservation of domestic animal genetic resources in Papua
New Guinea. NARI technical bulletin series No. 4, Lae, National Agriculture
Research Institute.
Quartermain, A.R. 2004b. Internal parasites of small ruminants in Papua New Guinea.
pp. 241-248 in Sani, R.A., Gray., G.D and Baker, R.L (Eds) Worm control for small
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
213
ruminants in tropical Asia. ACIAR Monograph No. 113. Canberra, Australian
Centre for International Agricultural Research.
Quilez, J., Torres, E., Chalmers, R.M., Hadfield, S.J., Del Cacho, E., Sanchez-Acedo, C.,
2008. Cryptosporidium genotypes and subtypes in lambs and goat kids in Spain.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 6026-6031.
Rahmouni, I., Essid, R., Aoun, K., Bouratbine, A., 2014. Glycoprotein 60 diversity in
Cryptosporidium parvum causing human and cattle cryptosporidiosis in the
rural region of Northern Tunisia. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 90, 346-350.
Read, C.M., Monis, P.T., Thompson, R.C., 2004. Discrimination of all genotypes of
Giardia duodenalis at the glutamate dehydrogenase locus using PCR-RFLP.
Infect. Genet. Evol. 4, 125-130.
Reeg, K.J., Gauly, M., Bauer, C., Mertens, C., Erhardt, G., Zahner, H., 2005. Coccidial
infections in housed lambs: oocyst excretion, antibody levels and genetic
influences on the infection. Vet. Parasitol. 127, 209-219.
Regassa, F., Sori, T., Dhuguma, R., Kiros, Y., 2006. Epidemiology of gastrointestinal
parasites of ruminants in Western Oromia, Ethophia. Int. J. Appl. Res. Vet. Med.
4, 51-57.
Reid, A., Lymbery, A., Ng, J., Tweedle, S., Ryan, U., 2010. Identification of novel and
zoonotic Cryptosporidium species in marine fish. Vet. Parasitol.168, 190-195.
Rekiki, A., Bouakane, A., Hammami, S., El Idrissi, A.H., Bernard, F., Rodolakis, A., 2004.
Efficacy of live Chlamydophila abortus vaccine 1B in protecting mice placentas
and foetuses against strains of Chlamydophila pecorum isolated from cases of
abortion. Vet. Microbiol. 99, 295-299.
Relman, D.A., Schmidt, T.M., Gajadhar, A., Sogin, M., Cross, J., Yoder, K., Sethabutr, O.,
Echeverria, P., 1996. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Cyclospora, the human
intestinal pathogen, suggests that it is closely related to Eimeria species. J.
Infect. Dis. 173, 440-445.
Rendtorff, R.C. 1979. The experimental transmission of Giardia lamblia among
volunteer subjects, pp. 64-81 in Jakubowski, W. and Hoff, J. C., (Eds)
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
214
Waterborne transmission of giardiasis, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Research and Development, Environmental Research Center,
Cincinnati, OH, U.S, EPA-600/9-79-001,.
Rieux, A., Paraud, C., Pors, I., Chartier, C., 2013. Molecular characterization of
Cryptosporidium isolates from pre-weaned calves in western France in relation
to age. Vet. Parasitol. 197, 7-12.
Roberts, J.D., Silbergeld, E.K., Graczyk, T., 2007. A probabilistic risk assessment of
Cryptosporidium exposure among Baltimore urban anglers. J. Toxicol. Environ.
Health 70, 1568-1576.
Roberts, R.J. 2012. Fish Pathology, Oxford, Wiley Blackwell, pp. 440.
Robertson, L.J., 2009. Giardia and Cryptosporidium infections in sheep and goats: a
review of the potential for transmission to humans via environmental
contamination. Epidemiol. Infect. 137, 913-921.
Robertson, L.J., Gjerde, B.K., Furuseth Hansen, E., 2010. The zoonotic potential of
Giardia and Cryptosporidium in Norwegian sheep: a longitudinal investigation
of 6 flocks of lambs. Vet. Parasitol. 171, 140-145.
Rodolakis, A., Souriau, A., 1989. Variations in the virulence of strains of Chlamydia
psittaci for pregnant ewes. Vet. Rec. 125, 87-90.
Rodolakis, A., Yousef Mohamad, K., 2010. Zoonotic potential of Chlamydophila. Vet.
Microbiol. 140, 382-391.
Roeber, F., Jex, A.R., Campbell, A.J., Campbell, B.E., Anderson, G.A., Gasser, R.B., 2011.
Evaluation and application of a molecular method to assess the composition of
strongylid nematode populations in sheep with naturally acquired infections.
Infect. Genet. Evol. 11, 849-854.
Roeber, F., Jex, A.R., Campbell, A.J., Nielsen, R., Anderson, G.A., Stanley, K.K., Gasser,
R.B., 2012a. Establishment of a robotic, high-throughput platform for the
specific diagnosis of gastrointestinal nematode infections in sheep. Int. J.
Parasitol. 42, 1151-1158.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
215
Roeber, F., Larsen, J.W., Anderson, N., Campbell, A.J., Anderson, G.A., Gasser, R.B., Jex,
A.R., 2012b. A molecular diagnostic tool to replace larval culture in
conventional faecal egg count reduction testing in sheep. PloS one 7, e37327.
Rossin, M.A., Timi, J.T., Malizia, A.I., 2006. A new species of Trichostrongylus
(Nematoda, Trichostrongyloidea) parasitizing the subterranean rodent
Ctenomys talarum (Rodentia, Octodontidae) from Mar de Cobo, Argentina.
Acta Parasitol. 51, 286-289.
Rozsa, L., Reiczigel, J., Majoros, G., 2000. Quantifying parasites in samples of hosts. The
J. Parasitol. 86, 228-232.
Ruiz, A., Foronda, P., Gonzalez, J.F., Guedes, A., Abreu-Acosta, N., Molina, J.M.,
Valladares, B., 2008. Occurrence and genotype characterization of Giardia
duodenalis in goat kids from the Canary Islands, Spain. Vet. Parasitol. 154, 137-
141.
Ruiz, A., Gonzalez, J.F., Rodriguez, E., Martin, S., Hernandez, Y.I., Almeida, R., Molina,
J.M., 2006. Influence of climatic and management factors on Eimeria infections
in goats from semi-arid zones. J. Vet. Med. 53, 399-402.
Runge, M., Binder, A., Schotte, U., Ganter, M., 2012. Investigations concerning the
prevalence of Coxiella burnetii and Chlamydia abortus in sheep in correlation
with management systems and abortion rate in Lower Saxony in 2004. Berliner
und Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift 125, 138-143.
Ryan, U., 2010. Cryptosporidium in birds, fish and amphibians. Exp. Parasitol. 124, 113-
120.
Ryan, U., Caccio, S.M., 2013. Zoonotic potential of Giardia. Int. J. Parasitol. 43, 943-
956.
Ryan, U., O'Hara, A., Xiao, L., 2004. Molecular and biological characterization of a
Cryptosporidium molnari-like isolate from a guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Appl.
Environ. Microbiol. 70, 3761-3765.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
216
Ryan, U., Xiao, L., 2013. Taxonomy and epidemiology of Cryptosporidium in Widmer,
G., Caccio, S. (Eds.), Cryptosporidium and cryptosporidiosis. Vienna, Springer-
Verlag GmbH. In Press.
Ryan, U., Xiao, L., Read, C., Zhou, L., Lal, A.A., Pavlasek, I., 2003. Identification of novel
Cryptosporidium genotypes from the Czech Republic. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
69, 4302-4307.
Ryan, U.M., Bath, C., Robertson, I., Read, C., Elliot, A., McInnes, L., Traub, R., Besier, B.,
2005. Sheep may not be an important zoonotic reservoir for Cryptosporidium
and Giardia parasites. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 4992-4997.
Sachse, K., Vretou, E., Livingstone, M., Borel, N., Pospischil, A., Longbottom, D., 2009.
Recent developments in the laboratory diagnosis of chlamydial infections. Vet.
Microbiol. 135, 2-21.
Sackett, D., Holmes, P. 2006. Assessing the economic cost of endemic disease on the
profitability Australian beef cattle and sheep producers. Meat and Livestock
Australia, Sydney. pp 119.
Saitou, N., Nei, M., 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for
reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4, 406-425.
Sakanari, J.A., McKerrow, J.H., 1989. Anisakiasis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2, 278-284.
Sam-Mohan, A., Chandrawathani, P., Sani R.A. and Rajamanickam, C. 1995. The
epidemiology and control of strongyles in sheep grazed under oil palm.
Proceedings of the International Conference on Novel Approaches to the
Control of Helminth Parasites of Livestock, University of New England,
Armidale, Australia, p. 53.
Sam-Yellowe, T.Y., 1996. Rhoptry organelles of the apicomplexa: Their role in host cell
invasion and intracellular survival. Parasitol. Today 12, 308-316.
Sani, R.A., Gray, G.D., Baker, R.L. 2004 (Eds). Worm control for small ruminants in
tropical asia. ACIAR Monograph No. 113. Canberra, Australian Center for
International Agriculture.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
217
Sani, R.A., Halim, R.A., Phang, N and Aida, M., 1994. Bionomics of the suprapopulation
of Haemonchus contortus in wet and dry seasons. 1st International Congress of
Parasitology and Tropical Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, p101.
Santin, M., Trout, J.M., Fayer, R., 2007. Prevalence and molecular characterization of
Cryptosporidium and Giardia species and genotypes in sheep in Maryland. Vet.
Parasitol. 146, 17-24.
Santin, M., Trout, J.M., Fayer, R., 2008. A longitudinal study of cryptosporidiosis in
dairy cattle from birth to 2 years of age. Vet. Parasitol. 155, 15-23.
Schoenian, S., 2010. Drugs (anthelmintics) commonly used to control gastro-intestinal
parasites (worms) in small ruminants in the U.S. Available at:
http://www.sheepandgoat.com/articles/antheltable.html (accessed 15 June
2013).
Scholz, T., 1999. Parasites in cultured and feral fish. Vet. Parasitol. 84, 317-335.
Seng, L.T., Tan, Z., Enrigh, W.J., 2006. Important parasitic diseases in cultured marine
fish in the Asia-Pacific region. AQUA Culture Asia Pacific Magazine 2, 14-16.
Setyobudi, E., Jeon, C.H., Lee, C.H., Seong, K.B., Kim, J.H., 2011. Occurrence and
identification of Anisakis spp. (Nematoda: Anisakidae) isolated from chum
salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) in Korea. Parasitol. Res. 108, 585-592.
Shamsi, S., Butcher, A.R., 2011. First report of human anisakidosis in Australia. Med. J.
Aust. 194, 199-200.
Shamsi, S., Norman, R., Gasser, R., Beveridge, I., 2009a. Genetic and morphological
evidences for the existence of sibling species within Contracaecum rudolphii
(Hartwich, 1964) (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in Australia. Parasitol. Res. 105, 529-
538.
Shamsi, S., Norman, R., Gasser, R., Beveridge, I., 2009b. Redescription and genetic
characterization of selected Contracaecum spp. (Nematoda: Anisakidae) from
various hosts in Australia. Parasitol. Res. 104, 1507-1525.
Sharma, R.L., 1994. Parasitic bronchitis in goats and the possible use of Dictyocaulus
filaria vaccine for its control. Vet. Parasitol. 51, 255-262.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
218
Shen, Y., Yin, J., Yuan, Z., Lu, W., Xu, Y., Xiao, L., Cao, J., 2011. The identification of the
Cryptosporidium ubiquitum in pre-weaned ovines from Aba Tibetan and Qiang
autonomous prefecture in China. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 24, 315-320.
Shewen, P.E., 1980. Chlamydial infection in animals: a review. Can. J. Vet. 21, 2-11.
Siedek, E.M., Burden, D., von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G., 2006. Feasibility of genus-
specific real-time PCR for the differentiation of larvae from gastrointestinal
nematodes of naturally infected sheep. Berliner und Munchener tierarztliche
Wochenschrift 119, 303-307.
Sitja-Bobadilla, A., Padros, F., Aguilera, C., Alvarez-Pellitero, P., 2005. Epidemiology of
Cryptosporidium molnari in Spanish gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.) and
European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.) cultures: from hatchery to market
size. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 131-139.
Slavin, D., 1955. Cryptosporidium meleagridis (sp. nov.). J. Comp. Pathol. 65, 262-266.
Smith, H.V., Caccio, S.M., Cook, N., Nichols, R.A., Tait, A., 2007. Cryptosporidium and
Giardia as foodborne zoonoses. Vet. Parasitol. 149, 29-40.
Smith, H.V., Rose, J.B., 1998. Waterborne cryptosporidiosis: current status. Parasitol.
Today 14, 14-22.
Smith, J.W., Wootten, R., 1978. Anisakis and anisakiasis. Adv. Parasitol. 16, 93-163.
Smith, P.T. 2007. Aquaculture in Papua New Guinea: Status of freshwater fish farming.
ACIAR Monograph No. 125, Canberra, ACIAR.
Soba, B., Logar, J., 2008. Genetic classification of Cryptosporidium isolates from
humans and calves in Slovenia. Parasitol. 135, 1263-1270.
Soltane, R., Guyot, K., Dei-Cas, E., Ayadi, A., 2007. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp.
(Eucoccidiorida: Cryptosporiidae) in seven species of farm animals in Tunisia.
Parasite 14, 335-338.
Soulsby, E.J.L., 1965. Text book of veterinary clinical parasitology. Oxford, Blackwell
Scientific Publications.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
219
Soulsby, E.J.L., 1982. Helminths, arthropods and protozoa of domesticated animals,
London,Bailliere, Tindall and Cassell.
Spraker, T.R., Lyons, E.T., Tolliver, S.C., Bair, H.D., 2003. Ascaridoid nematodes and
associated lesions in stomachs of subadult male northern fur seals (Callorhinus
ursinus) on St. Paul Island, Alaska: (1987-1999). J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 15, 432-
437.
Sreter, T., Varga, I., 2000. Cryptosporidiosis in birds--a review. Vet. Parasitol. 87, 261-
279.
Stamp, J.T., McEwen, A.D., Watt, J.A.A., Nisbet, D.I., 1950. Enzootic abortion in ewes. I.
Transmission of the disease. Vet. Rec. 62, 251-254.
Stamp, J.T., Watt, J.A.A., Cockburn, R.B., 1952. Enzootic abortion in ewes: complement
fixation test. J. Comp. Pathol. 62, 93-101.
Stockdale, P.H., 1977. The pathogenesis of the lesions produced by Eimeria zuernii in
calves. Can. J. Comp. Med. 41, 338-344.
Stuen, S., Longbottom, D., 2011. Treatment and control of chlamydial and rickettsial
infections in sheep and goats. Vet. Clin. N. Am. 27, 213-233.
Sugimachi K, Inokuchi K, Ooiwa T, Fujino T, Y, I., 1985. Acute gastric anisakiasis. J. Am.
Med. Assoc. 253, 1012-1013.
Sulaiman, I.M., Fayer, R., Bern, C., Gilman, R.H., Trout, J.M., Schantz, P.M., Das, P., Lal,
A.A., Xiao, L., 2003. Triosephosphate isomerase gene characterization and
potential zoonotic transmission of Giardia duodenalis. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 9,
1444-1452.
Sulaiman, I.M., Hira, P.R., Zhou, L., Al-Ali, F.M., Al-Shelahi, F.A., Shweiki, H.M., Iqbal, J.,
Khalid, N., Xiao, L., 2005. Unique endemicity of cryptosporidiosis in children in
Kuwait. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43, 2805-2809.
Sweeny, J.P., Robertson, I.D., Ryan, U.M., Jacobson, C., Woodgate, R.G., 2011a.
Comparison of molecular and McMaster microscopy techniques to confirm the
presence of naturally acquired strongylid nematode infections in sheep. Mol.
Biochem. Parasitol. 180, 62-67.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
220
Sweeny, J.P., Ryan, U.M., Robertson, I.D., Yang, R., Bell, K., Jacobson, C., 2011b.
Longitudinal investigation of protozoan parasites in meat lamb farms in
southern Western Australia. Prev. Vet. Med. 101, 192-203.
Szeredi, L., Janosi, S., Tenk, M., Tekes, L., Bozso, M., Deim, Z., Molnar, T., 2006.
Epidemiological and pathological study on the causes of abortion in sheep and
goats in Hungary (1998-2005). Acta Vet. Hung. 54, 503-515.
Talafha, A.Q., Ababneh, M.M., Al-Majali, A.M., 2012. Prevalence and risk factors
associated with Chlamydophila abortus infection in dairy herds in Jordan. Trop.
Anim. Health Prod. 44, 1841-1846.
Tamura, K., Nei, M., 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the
control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol.
Evol. 10, 512-526.
Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M., Kumar, S., 2011. MEGA5:
Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood,
evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28,
2731-2739.
Tariq, K.A., Chishti, M.Z., Ahmad, F., Shawl, A.S., 2008. Epidemiology of gastrointestinal
nematodes of sheep managed under traditional husbandry system in Kashmir
valley. Vet. Parasitol. 158, 138-143.
Tenter, A.M., Barta, J.R., Beveridge, I., Duszynski, D.W., Mehlhorn, H., Morrison, D.A.,
Thompson, R.C., Conrad, P.A., 2002. The conceptual basis for a new
classification of the coccidia. Int. J. Parasitol. 32, 595-616.
Theunissen, J.J., Kariwiga, G., Ossewaarde, J.M., van Rijsoort-Vos, J.H., Stolz, E., van der
Meijden, W.I., 1995. Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in women attending
a family planning clinic in Papua New Guinea. Genitourinary Med. 71, 295-298.
Thompson, H.P., Dooley, J.S., Kenny, J., McCoy, M., Lowery, C.J., Moore, J.E., Xiao, L.,
2007. Genotypes and subtypes of Cryptosporidium spp. in neonatal calves in
Northern Ireland. Parasitol. Res. 100, 619-624.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
221
Thompson, R.C., 2000. Giardiasis as a re-emerging infectious disease and its zoonotic
potential. Int. J. Parasitol. 30, 1259-1267.
Thompson, R.C., 2004. The zoonotic significance and molecular epidemiology of
Giardia and giardiasis. Vet. Parasitol. 126, 15-35.
Thompson, R.C., Hopkins, R.M., Homan, W.L., 2000. Nomenclature and genetic
groupings of Giardia infecting mammals. Parasitol. Today 16, 210-213.
Tsakos, P., Siarkou, V., Guscetti, F., Chowdhury, H., Papaioannou, N., Vretou, E.,
Papadopoulos, O., 2001. Experimental infection of pregnant ewes with enteric
and abortion-source Chlamydophila abortus. Vet. Microbiol. 82, 285-291.
Tyzzer, E.E., 1907. A sporozoan found in the peptic glands of the common mouse. Proc.
Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 5, 12-13.
Tyzzer, E.E., 1910. An extracellular coccidium, Cryptosporidium muris (gen. et. sp. nov.)
of the gastric glands of the common mouse. J. Med. Res. 23, 487-509.
Tyzzer, E.E., 1912. Cryptosporidium parvum (sp. nov.), a coccidium found in the small
intestine of the common mouse. Arch. Protistenkd 26, 394-412.
Umehara, A., Kawakami, Y., Araki, J., Uchida, A., 2008. Multiplex PCR for the
identification of Anisakis simplex sensu stricto, Anisakis pegreffii and the other
anisakid nematodes. Parasitol. Int. 57, 49-53.
Umehara, A., Kawakami, Y., Matsui, T., Araki, J., Uchida, A., 2006. Molecular
identification of Anisakis simplex sensu stricto and Anisakis pegreffii
(Nematoda: Anisakidae) from fish and cetacean in Japanese waters. Parasitol.
Int. 55, 267-271.
Umehara, A., Kawakami, Y., Ooi, H.K., Uchida, A., Ohmae, H., Sugiyama, H., 2010.
Molecular identification of Anisakis type I larvae isolated from hairtail fish off
the coasts of Taiwan and Japan. Int. J. Food. Microbiol. 143, 161-165.
Valentini, A., Mattiucci, S., Bondanelli, P., Webb, S.C., Mignucci-Giannone, A.A., Colom-
Llavina, M.M., Nascetti, G., 2006. Genetic relationships among Anisakis species
(Nematoda: Anisakidae) inferred from mitochondrial cox2 sequences, and
comparison with allozyme data. J. Parasitol. 92, 156-166.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
222
Vallely, A., Page, A., Dias, S., Siba, P., Lupiwa, T., Law, G., Millan, J., Wilson, D.P.,
Murray, J.M., Toole, M., Kaldor, J.M., 2010. The prevalence of sexually
transmitted infections in Papua New Guinea: a systematic review and meta-
analysis. PloS one 5, e15586.
van der Giessen, J.W., de Vries, A., Roos, M., Wielinga, P., Kortbeek, L.M., Mank, T.G.,
2006. Genotyping of Giardia in Dutch patients and animals: a phylogenetic
analysis of human and animal isolates. Int. J. Parasitol. 36, 849-858.
Van Thiel, P.H., Kuipers, F.C., Roskam, R.T., 1960. A nematode parasitic to herring,
causing acute abdominal syndromes in man. Trop. Geogr. Med. 12, 97-113.
van Wyk, J.A., Bath, G.F., 2002. The FAMACHA system for managing haemonchosis in
sheep and goats by clinically identifying individual animals for treatment. Vet.
Res. 33, 509-529.
Varghese, T., Yayabu, R., 1985. Ovine coccidia in Papua New Guinea. Vet. Parasitol. 17,
181-191.
Vercruysse, J., 1982. The coccidia of sheep and goats in Senegal. Vet. Parasitol. 10, 297-
306.
Villarroel, A. 2013. Internal parasites in sheep and goats. Oregon State University, U.S.
http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1957/36666/em9055
.pdf (accessed 20 March 2014).
Villemonteix, P., Agius, G., Ducroz, B., Rouffineau, J., Plocoste, V., Castets, M., Magnin,
G., 1990. Pregnancy complicated by severe Chlamydia psittaci infection
acquired from a goat flock: a case report. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol.Reprod. Biol.
37, 91-94.
Vincent, D., Low, S., 2000. A review of Papua New Guinea's red meat industry. ACIAR
Monograph No. 66. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research,
Canberra.
Vlahovic, A., Dovc, A., Lasta, P., 2006. Zoonotic aspects of animal chlamydioses-review.
Veterinarski Ariv 76, S259-S274.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
223
Van Metre, D., 2013. Gastrointestinal parasites in sheep and goats: frequently asked
questions. Available at http://www.ext.colostate.edu/pubs/livestk/08019.html
(accessed 16 April 2013).
von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G., Coles, G.C., Jackson, F., Bauer, C., Borgsteede, F., Cirak,
V.Y., Demeler, J., Donnan, A., Dorny, P., Epe, C., Harder, A., Hoglund, J.,
Kaminsky, R., Kerboeuf, D., Kuttler, U., Papadopoulos, E., Posedi, J., Small, J.,
Varady, M., Vercruysse, J., Wirtherle, N., 2009. Standardization of the egg hatch
test for the detection of benzimidazole resistance in parasitic nematodes.
Parasitol. Res. 105, 825-834.
von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G., Pape, M., Witzendorff, C., von Schnieder, T., 2002.
Allele-specific PCR for the beta-tubulin codon 200 TTC/TAC polymorphism using
single adult and larval small strongyle (cyathostominae) stages. J. Parasitol. 88,
254-257.
Walder, G., Hotzel, H., Brezinka, C., Gritsch, W., Tauber, R., Wurzner, R., Ploner, F.,
2005. An unusual cause of sepsis during pregnancy: recognizing infection with
Chlamydophila abortus. Obstet. Gynecol. 106, 1215-1217.
Waldhalm, D.G., Frank, F.W., Meinershagen, W.A., Philip, R.N., Thomas, L.A., 1971.
Lambing performance of ewes inoculated with Chlamydia sp. before and after
breeding. Am. J. Vet. Res. 32, 809-811.
Waller, P.J., Chandrawathani, P., 2005. Haemonchus contortus: Parasite problem No. 1
from Tropics - Polar Circle. Problems and prospects for control based on
epidemiology. Trop. Biomed. 22, 131-137.
Wang, C.R., Xiao, J.Y., Chen, A.H., Chen, J., Wang, Y., Gao, J.F., Zhu, X.Q., 2010a.
Prevalence of coccidial infection in sheep and goats in northeastern China. Vet.
Parasitol. 174, 213-217.
Wang, F.I., Shieh, H., Liao, Y.K., 2001. Prevalence of Chlamydophila abortus infection in
domesticated ruminants in Taiwan. JPN. Vet. Med. Sci. 63, 1215-1220.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
224
Wang, Y., Feng, Y., Cui, B., Jian, F., Ning, C., Wang, R., Zhang, L., Xiao, L., 2010b. Cervine
genotype is the major Cryptosporidium genotype in sheep in China. Parasitol.
Res. 106, 341-347.
White, C.A., Jr., 2004. Nitazoxanide: a new broad spectrum antiparasitic agent. Expert
Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2, 43-49.
Whitlock, H.V., 1948. Some modifications of the McMaster helminth egg counting
technique and apparatus. J. Counc. Sci. Ind. Res. 21, 177-180.
Wilson, I.G., 1997. Inhibition and facilitation of nucleic acid amplification. Appl.
Environ. Microbiol. 63, 3741-3751.
Woji, A.Y., Little, D.A., Ikwuegbu, O.A., 1994. Prevalence of coccidial infections in the
West African Dwarf goat in the subhumid zone of Nigeria. Trop. Anim. Health
Prod. 26, 1-6.
Wolstenholme, A.J., Fairweather, I., Prichard, R., von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G.,
Sangster, N.C., 2004. Drug resistance in veterinary helminths. Trends Parasitol.
20, 469-476.
Woodgate, R.G., Besier, R.B., 2010. Sustainable use of anthelmintics in an integrated
parasite management program for sheep. Anim. Prod. Sci. 50, 440-443.
World Organisation for Animal Health - OIE, 2008. Cryptosporidiosis, pp. 1192-1215 in
OIE Terrestrial manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals.
http://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahm/2.09.04_CRY
PTO.pdf (accessed 24 April 2013).
Xiao, L., 2010. Molecular epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis: an update. Exp. Parasitol.
124, 80-89.
Xiao, L., Fayer, R., 2008. Molecular characterisation of species and genotypes of
Cryptosporidium and Giardia and assessment of zoonotic transmission. Int. J.
Parasitol. 38, 1239-1255.
Xiao, L., Fayer, R., Ryan, U., Upton, S.J., 2004. Cryptosporidium taxonomy: recent
advances and implications for public health. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 17, 72-97.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
225
Xiao, L., Feng, Y., 2008. Zoonotic cryptosporidiosis. FEMS Immun. Med. Microbiol. 52,
309-323.
Xiao, L., Herd, R.P., 1993. Quantitation of Giardia cysts and Cryptosporidium oocysts in
fecal samples by direct immunofluorescence assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31, 2944-
2946.
Yang, R., Jacobson, C., Gardner, G., Carmichael, I., Campbell, A.J., Ng-Hublin, J., Ryan,
U., 2014a. Longitudinal prevalence, oocyst shedding and molecular
characterisation of Cryptosporidium species in sheep across four states in
Australia. Vet. Parasitol. 200, 50-58.
Yang, R., Jacobson, C., Gardner, G., Carmichael, I., Campbell, A.J., Ryan, U., 2014b.
Development of a quantitative PCR (qPCR) for Giardia and analysis of the
prevalence, cyst shedding and genotypes of Giardia present in sheep across
four states in Australia. Exp. Parasitol. 137, 46-52.
Yang, R., Jacobson, C., Gardner, G., Carmichael, I., Campbell, A.J., Ryan, U., 2014c.
Longitudinal prevalence and faecal shedding of Chlamydophila, in sheep across
four states in Australia. Vet. J. Under Review.
Yang, R., Jacobson, C., Gardner, G., Carmichael, I., Campbell, A.J., Ryan, U., 2014d.
Longitudinal prevalence, oocyst shedding and molecular characterisation of
Eimeria species in sheep across four states in Australia. Submitted to Exp.
Parasitol.
Yang, R., Jacobson, C., Gordon, C., Ryan, U., 2009. Prevalence and molecular
characterisation of Cryptosporidium and Giardia species in pre-weaned sheep
in Australia. Vet. Parasitol. 161, 19-24.
Yang, R., Murphy, C., Song, Y., Ng-Hublin, J., Estcourt, A., Hijjawi, N., Chalmers, R.,
Hadfield, S., Bath, A., Gordon, C., Ryan, U., 2013. Specific and quantitative
detection and identification of Cryptosporidium hominis and C. parvum in
clinical and environmental samples. Exp. Parasitol. 135, 142-147.
Yang, R., Reid, A., Lymbery, A., Ryan, U., 2010. Identification of zoonotic Giardia
genotypes in fish. Int. J. Parasitol. 40, 779-785.
Bibliography Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
226
Yann, C.F., 2006. Molecular and biological characterisation of anisakids in Western
Australia. B. Sc. Honours thesis, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.
Ye, J., Xiao, L., Wang, Y., Wang, L., Amer, S., Roellig, D.M., Guo, Y., Feng, Y., 2014.
Periparturient transmission of Cryptosporidium xiaoi from ewes to lambs. Vet.
Parasitol. 197, 627-633.
Zajac, A.M., 2006. Gastrointestinal nematodes of small ruminants: life cycle,
anthelmintics, and diagnosis. Vet. Clin. N. AM. 22, 529-541.
Zajac, A.M., Johnson, J., King, S.E., 2002. Evaluation of the importance of centrifugation
as a component of zinc sulfate fecal flotation examinations. J. Am. Anim. Hosp.
Assoc. 38, 221-224.
Zanguee, N., Lymbery, J.A., Lau, J., Suzuki, A., Yang, R., Ng, J., Ryan, U., 2010.
Identification of novel Cryptosporidium species in aquarium fish. Vet. Parasitol.
174, 43-48.
Zarlenga, D.S., Barry Chute, M., Gasbarre, L.C., Boyd, P.C., 2001. A multiplex PCR assay
for differentiating economically important gastrointestinal nematodes of cattle.
Vet. Parasitol. 97, 199-209.
Zhu, X., Gasser, R.B., Podolska, M., Chilton, N.B., 1998. Characterisation of anisakid
nematodes with zoonotic potential by nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Int. J.
Parasitol. 28, 1911-1921.
Zhu, X.Q., Podolska, M., Liu, J.S., Yu, H.Q., Chen, H.H., Lin, Z.X., Luo, C.B., Song, H.Q.,
Lin, R.Q., 2007. Identification of anisakid nematodes with zoonotic potential
from Europe and China by single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis of
nuclear ribosomal DNA. Parasitol. Res. 101, 1703-1707.
Appendices Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
Appendices
The following appendices include journal articles published by the candidate
over the course of the candidature. They are submitted as additional evidence for
candidature for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Appendix A: The survey questionnaire described in Chapter 2.
Appendix B: Koinari, M., Karl, S., Ryan, U., Lymbery, A.J., 2013. Infection levels of
gastrointestinal parasites in sheep and goats in Papua New Guinea. Journal of
Helminthology. 87, 409-415.
Appendix C: Koinari, M., J., Lymbery, A.J., Ryan, U.M., 2014. Cryptosporidium species in
sheep and goats from Papua New Guinea. Experimental Parasitology. 141, 134-137.
Appendix D: Koinari, M., Karl, S., Ng-Hublin, J., Lymbery, A.J., Ryan, U.M., 2013.
Identification of novel and zoonotic Cryptosporidium species in fish from Papua New
Guinea. Veterinary Parasitology. 198, 1-9.
Appendix E: Koinari, M., Karl, S., Elliot, A., Ryan, U., Lymbery, A.J., 2013. Identification
of Anisakis species (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in marine fish hosts from Papua New
Guinea. Veterinary Parasitology. 193, 126-133.
Appendix A Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
A-1
Appendix A
Survey Questionnaire
Appendix A Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
A-2
Prevalence and management factors related to the prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in sheep and goat in wet mainland of Papua New Guinea.
Conducted by: Melanie Koinari, Murdoch University, in collaboration with National Agricultural Research Institute of Papua New Guinea, Bubia, Morobe Province.
Section 1: GENERAL MANAGEMENT 1. How many animals are there in your farm/herd? Sheep:____________________ Goats:____________________ 2 a) How many animals by age group? Sheep Number of animals
Male Adults
Female Breeder
Pre-weaned (0-2 months old lamb)
Post-weaned (2-6 months old lambs)
Goats Number of animals
Male Adults
Female Breeder
Pre-weaned (0-2 months old lamb)
Post-weaned (2-6 months old lambs)
2 b) Number of lambs in your herd/farm: __________________________ Number of kids in your herd/farm: __________________________ 3. How large is your farm? __________________________ 4. How are the animals fed? Feed Yes/No
Grazing: Cut and Carry: Feed: Mixed feeding (eg: grazing and cut and carry):
5. If the animals are let free to graze, what type of grazing system is adopted for the herd?
No restriction (free area) The animals are allowed to graze at particular areas restricted by non-electric fencing.
6. Are the animals separated according to gender? Yes/No __________ 7. Do the animals get any feed supplements? Yes/No __________ If no, go to Question number 10. If yes, what type of feed supplement is used? (Please specify)
8. If feed supplement is used, is it specially made or purchased?
Made Purchased Both
Appendix A Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
A-3
9. If purchased, where do you buy the feed supplement from? Feed distributor
Others (Please specify): _____________________
10. What is the source of water for the herd?
Tap water River Groundwater Others (Please specify): ______________________
11. a) Approximately how far is your sheep herd from the nearest sheep herd? ___________________________ b) Approximately how far is your goat herd from the nearest goat herd? ___________________________ 12. a) Approximately how far is your sheep herd from other livestock such as goat, buffalo, cattle, and pigs? ___________________________ b) Approximately how far is your goat herd from other livestock such as sheep, buffalo, cattle, and pigs? ___________________________ 13. When was the last time you introduced new sheep/goat to your farm? Sheep: ___________________________ Goat: ___________________________ 14. How often do you introduce new animals to your farm? ___________________________ 15. Are there are any other animals on this farm? Yes/No __________ If yes, please specify: ____________________________________________________________________ 16. Do you have any specific management practices for handling animal waste? Yes/No __________ 17. If no, where do the faeces or effluent go? _____________________________________________________________________________ 20. If yes, how do you manage the animal waste? _____________________________________________________________________________ 22. If treated, what type of waste treatment system do you use? _____________________________________________________________________________
Appendix A Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
A-4
Section 2: EWES - LAMB MANAGEMENT
Perinatal management
1a) Where are lambs born?
multi-ewes lambing area single-ewes lambing area born in the field
1b) Where are kids born? multi-does doeling area single -does doeling area born in the field
If the lambs/kids are born in pens, please answer Questions 2 to 4. If not proceed to Question 5. 2. Do you clean the lambing pens before young are born? Lamb Goat kid Yes Yes No No 3. What is the floor of the lambing pen made of?
Lamb (Yes/No) Kid (Yes/No)
Concrete __________ __________
Earth __________ __________
Gravel __________ __________
Others (Please specify) __________ __________
4. If earth flooring, do you sweep the floor? Yes/No __________ 5. Do you separate young animal from their mothers within 12 hours after birth? Lamb Kids Yes Yes No No
Section 3: HERD HEALTH PROGRAM
1. Is medication given to your herd? Yes/No __________If no, proceed to Section 4.
2. Is medication given to newborn animals?
Lamb Kids Yes Yes No No
3. If yes, what type of medication is given to the young animals?
Lamb: __________________________________
Kid: __________________________________
4. When was the most recent medication given?
Date: _____________ (dd/mm/yyyy)
Appendix A Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
A-5
5. What type of medication is routinely used for the herd?
The brand name: __________________________________
6. Approximately how many times do you give treatments each year? _________
Section 4: HEALTH
1. Do you know any disease in your herd/flock? Yes/No _________________
If yes, please specify:_____________________________________________
If your heard has diarrhoea, please answer questions 2 to 4.
2. Do you know what caused this diarrhoea? Yes/No _________________
If yes, please outline: _____________________________________________
3. Do you know the clinical signs of diarrhoea? Yes/No _________________
If yes, please describe: _____________________________________________
4. Do you know how to control diarrhoea? Yes/No _________________
If yes, please describe: ____________________________________________
General comments:
Thank you for taking the time to complete this questionnaire. Melanie Koinari PhD student, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia
Appendix B Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
B-1
Appendix B
Infection levels of gastrointestinal parasites in sheep and goats in
Papua New Guinea.
Infection levels of gastrointestinal parasitesin sheep and goats in Papua New Guinea
M. Koinari1*, S. Karl2, U. Ryan1 and A.J. Lymbery1
1School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University,Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia: 2School of Physics,The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia,
Australia
(Received 28 February 2012; Accepted 25 July 2012; First Published Online 11 October 2012)
Abstract
Gastrointestinal parasites of livestock cause diseases of important socio-economic concern worldwide. The present study investigated the prevalence ofgastrointestinal parasites in sheep and goats in lowland and highland regionsof Papua New Guinea (PNG). Faecal samples were collected from a total of165 small ruminants (110 sheep and 55 goats) from February to April 2011.Analysis by a modified McMaster technique revealed that 128 animals (72%of sheep and 89% of goats) were infected with one or more species ofgastrointestinal parasites. The gastrointestinal parasites found and theirprevalences in sheep (S) and in goats (G) were as follows: strongyle 67.3% (S),85.5% (G); Eimeria 17.3% (S), 16.4% (G); Strongyloides, 8.2% (S), 23.6% (G); Fasciola,5.5% (S), 18.2% (G); Trichuris, 1.8% (S), 3.6% (G); and Nematodirus, 1.8% (S), 3.6%(G). Two additional genera were found in goats: Moniezia (9.1%) and Dictocaulus(3.6%). This is the first study to quantitatively examine the prevalence ofgastrointestinal parasites in goats in PNG. The high rates of parasitism observedin the present study are likely to be associated with poor farming managementpractices, including lack of pasture recovery time, lack of parasite controlmeasures and poor-quality feed.
Introduction
Parasitism is recognized as a major threat to theproduction of small ruminants in both small-scale andlarge-scale farms. Gastrointestinal (GI) parasites causehigh mortality, reduce production and lead to asignificant overall economic loss (Al-Quaisy et al., 1987;McLeod, 1995; Simpson, 2000). GI parasites are highlyprevalent in sheep and goats in humid subtropical andtropical areas of the world (Yadav & Tandon, 1989; Bankset al., 1990; Barger et al., 1994; Dorny et al., 1995; Cheah &Rajamanickam, 1997; Regassa et al., 2006; Nwosu et al.,2007; Gadahi et al., 2009; Abebe et al., 2011; Dagnachewet al., 2011).
There are approximately 15,000 sheep and 20,000 goatsin Papua New Guinea (PNG) (Quartermain, 2002).Animals are raised by institutions for breeding or fornutritional research purposes and by smallholder farmersfor subsistence meat production. There are no sheep andgoats native to PNG. Tropical sheep from South-EastAsia were introduced by colonial administrators andmissionaries in the late 19th century and this sheeppopulation is known as PNG Priangan. In the 1980s,temperate Corriedale and Perendale sheep from NewZealand were brought to the cooler highlands of PNG.These temperate sheep breeds were crossed with thePNG Priangan sheep to produce crossbreds known asHighlands Halfbred (Quartermain, 2002). PNG Priangansheep are mainly raised in areas of lower altitude,whereas Highlands Halfbred sheep are raised at higheraltitudes. A variety of dairy goats, which are now referredto as PNG genotype, were introduced during the earlycolonial period (Quartermain, 2002).
*Fax: 61 89310 414E-mail: M.Koinari@murdoch.edu.au
Journal of Helminthology (2013) 87, 409–415 doi:10.1017/S0022149X12000594q Cambridge University Press 2012
Appendix B Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
B-2
Distribution and productivity of small ruminants inPNG are hindered mainly by poor health, nutritionand management (Quartermain, 2004). GI parasites areexpected to be widespread in PNG due to its humidtropical climate. In some parts of PNG, previoussurveys, which were conducted mostly in governmentstations, identified a diversity of internal parasitespecies in small ruminants (Varghese & Yayabu, 1985;Owen, 1988, 1989, 1998; also reviewed by Quartermain,2004). However, there is insufficient information onthe epidemiology of the GI parasites infecting sheepand goats in PNG. Such information is essential forunderstanding the economic impact these parasites canhave on farmers and to support decision-makingregarding the treatment and prevention of parasiticdiseases in these animals. The present study, therefore,was conducted to obtain data on the prevalence andinfection levels of gastrointestinal parasites in sheep andgoats on several farms in PNG.
Materials and methods
Study sites
The study was conducted from February to April 2011in two broad agro-climatic zones, the highlands (specificstudy sites: Tambul, Baisu, Menifo and Ungai-Bena) andlowlands (specific study site: Labu) in the central regionof mainland PNG (fig. 1).
The altitudes of the study sites are 0 m for Labu,1600–1608 m for Menifo and Ungai-Bena, 1730 m forBaisu and 2320 m for Tambul, with mean annualtemperatures of 268C, 20.18C, 20.18C, 18.38C and 14.78C,respectively (Bourke, 2010). The mean annual rainfall forLabu is above 4000 mm and between 2000 and 3500 mmfor Ungai-Bena, Baisu and Tambul (Quartermain, 2004).Menifo is drier than most of the PNG highlands andreceives a mean annual rainfall of 1000–1500 mm(Quartermain, 2004).
The study sites were further characterized by aquestionnaire survey, in which 20 farm managers andsmallholder farmers were interviewed. It consisted of
questions regarding general farm management practices,feeding systems and herd health programmes.
Farm managementThe flocks from the three institutional farms (Labu,
Baisu and Tambul) were kept together in fenced areas(approximately 20–60 ha), grazed pasture at a highstocking rate at daytime and were kept in houses withwooden, slatted floors at night. At the time of samplecollection, the total numbers of sheep and goats in Labu,Baisu and Tambul were 125, 70 and 143, respectively.The subsistence farmers kept few animals (usually fewerthan 15) which grazed free range or were tethered andhoused at night on slatted floors or on the groundunderneath the farmer’s house.
Feeding systemMost animals grazed on native grasses and shrubs.
Smallholder farmers also fed their animals with starchyvegetables (mostly sweet potatoes). The interviewedfarmers also indicated that there were shortages offeed. The animals drank from troughs (sourced fromwater supply or rainwater tanks), rainwater run-off wateror ponds.
Herd health programThe floors of the resting houses were not swept. The
animals were penned on dirty floor, ground or on bareconcrete floors. The smallholder farmers did not sheartheir sheep and explained that they did not have theresources for it. Most farm managers reported that themost common signs of illness in their animals werediarrhoea and coughing, followed by itching and hairloss. Most smallholder farmers did not know aboutcauses of diseases in their sheep and goats or the use ofanthelmintic drugs for treatment of nematode infec-tions. For instance, a man in Ungai-Bena reported thedeath of his entire flock (n ¼ 25) and noticed nematodeworms in the gut of a dead sheep. The three largeinstitutional flocks were drenched with benzimidazole(Panacur) nominally at bimonthly intervals. At the timeof sampling animals had been drenched 2 monthspreviously in Labu and 4 months previously in Baisuand Tambul.
Collection and examination of faecal samples
A total of 110 faecal samples from sheep and 55 faecalsamples from goats were obtained from the rectum ofrandomly selected animals between 07.30 and 09.00 h andkept at 48C until taken to the laboratory for analysis. Eachsample was examined visually for consistency, mucusand macroscopic parasites. Two grams of each faecalsample were examined using a modified McMastertechnique (Whitlock, 1948). Parasites were identifiedmorphologically to genus, or in the case of strongyles, togroup level (Soulsby, 1965). Parasite egg load wasexpressed as eggs per gram faeces (EPG). The volume ofthe flotation fluid used in the examinations was 50 ml andthe fluid volume examined in the counting chamber was0.3 ml. Since EPG is calculated using equation 1, the
Fig. 1. Topographical map of Papua New Guinea (PNG) showingthe study sites.
410 M. Koinari et al.
Appendix B Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
B-3
minimum EPG count in our analyses was 83 eggs/gand occurred when only one egg was observed in thecounting chamber.
EPG ¼ eggscounted£total volume ðmlÞ
½examined volume ðmlÞ£weight of faeces ðgÞ�ð1Þ
Data analysis
Prevalence was calculated as the percentage of positivesamples in the total number of samples examined. Apartfrom the overall prevalence (i.e. the infection with any GIparasite) in each flock, prevalence was also calculated foreach parasite type, stratified by animal species and breed,study site, agro-ecological zone and farm managementtype. Differences in prevalence among groups werecompared by Fisher’s exact test (FET) (for two groups) orchi-squared analysis (for more than two groups).
EPG counts were transformed to their decadiclogarithms to obtain a normal distribution of valuesprior to statistical testing for significant differencesbetween animal species and breeds, study sites, agro-ecological zones and farm management systems. Differ-ences between/among groups were compared by t-testsor one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA); followed by apost hoc Tukey’s HSD test. Statistical analyses wereperformed using GraphPad Prism version 4 (GraphPadInc., California, USA).
Results
From the total of 165 small ruminants examined, 128(78%) were found to be infected with one or more types ofGI parasites. A mixed infection with two or more types ofGI parasites was found in 39% (50/128) of the infectedanimals: 33% (26/79) of sheep and 49% (24/49) of goats(not significantly different by FET, P ¼ 0.09).
Table 1 shows prevalence and mean EPG counts overall sampling sites, stratified by the type of host animal(sheep or goat) and the type of parasite. The overallprevalence of GI parasite infection was significantly
higher (FET; P ¼ 0.017) in goats (89%, 49/55) than insheep (72%, 79/110). Specifically, prevalence of strongyle(FET; P ¼ 0.0002), Strongyloides (FET; P ¼ 0.013) andFasciola (FET; P ¼ 0.013) were significantly higher ingoats than in sheep. In addition, the mean EPG counts forstrongyle were significantly higher in goats than in sheep(t ¼ 2.48, P ¼ 0.014).
Table 2 summarizes prevalence and mean EPG datagrouped by study site. There were no statisticallysignificant differences in the prevalence but there wereseveral significant differences in the EPG counts fordifferent GI parasite types across the study sites.
Strongyle and Strongyloides parasites were foundin both sheep and goats in all study sites. The meanEPG counts for goats infected with Strongyloides in Tambulwere significantly higher than the ones in Labu (ANOVA:F ¼ 3.91, P ¼ 0.05, Tukey’s test: P , 0.05). Eimeria wasfound in sheep from four study sites (Labu, Ungai-Bena,Tambul and Menifo) and in goats from three sites (Labu,Ungai-Bena and Baisu). In sheep, the mean EPG count forEimeria in Labu was significantly lower than in Menifo(ANOVA: F ¼ 3.41, P ¼ 0.045; Tukey’s test: P , 0.05).
No significant differences were observed for theother genera of GI parasites. Fasciola was found in sheepfrom three study sites (Labu, Ungai-Bena and Tambul)and in goats from three study sites (Labu, Ungai-Benaand Baisu). Trichuris occurred in sheep from two studysites (Ungai-Bena and Menifo) and in goats only fromLabu. Nematodirus was found in sheep from two sites(Baisu and Tambul) and in goats only from Baisu.Moniezia was only found in goats from three study sites(Labu, Ungai-Bena and Baisu). Dictyocaulus was onlyfound in goats from Labu.
There was also a trend for goats to be more heavilyinfected than sheep in all areas. In Labu, mean EPG forstrongyle (t ¼ 2.47, P ¼ 0.021) and Eimeria (t ¼ 3.95,P ¼ 0.004) were higher in goats than in sheep. In Ungai-Bena, the prevalence for Strongyloides was higher in goatsthan in sheep (FET: P ¼ 0.037) and mean EPG forstrongyle in goats was higher than in sheep (t ¼ 3.03;P ¼ 0.006).
Table 1. GI parasite prevalence and eggs/g (EPG) counts stratified by GI parasite type for thetotal number of faecal samples collected in the present study. N is the total number of faecalsamples. The total prevalence refers to the fraction of animals infected with one or more GIparasite types. EPG counts are given as means ^ SD. Where no SD value is given on themean EPG count, there was only a single or few positive observations with the same values,so that SD could not be calculated. Values with the superscript (*) are significantly differentbetween sheep and goats by either Fisher’s exact test (FET) or t-test.
Goat (N ¼ 55) Sheep (N ¼ 110)
ParasitePrevalence
(%) EPGPrevalence
(%) EPG
Strongyle 85.5* 745 ^ 622* 67.3* 762 ^ 1264*Strongyloides 23.6* 277 ^ 437 8.2* 323 ^ 377Eimeria 16.4 203 ^ 103 17.3 633 ^ 1467Fasciola 18.2* 257 ^ 275 5.5* 125 ^ 46Trichuris 3.6 125 ^ 59 1.8 111 ^ 48Moniezia 9.1 116 ^ 46 0 0Dictyocaulus 3.6 83 0 0Nematodirus 3.6 249 ^ 117 1.8 111 ^ 48Total 89* 927 ^ 821 72* 909 ^ 1795
Gastrointestinal parasites in sheep and goats in Papua New Guinea 411
Appendix B Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
B-4
Table 3 shows the prevalence and mean EPG counts forGI parasites with respect to sheep breed, agro-ecologyand farm management systems. For comparisons ofagro-ecology and farm management systems, the data
for sheep and goats were combined. No statisticallysignificant differences were found in either prevalence ormean EPG counts for each parasite type between the twoagro-ecological zones, with the exception for Eimeria and
Table 2. GI parasite prevalence and eggs/g (EPG) counts for GI parasite type and study site. NG and NS are the total numbers of faecalsamples collected at each study site for goats and sheep, respectively. P (%) is the prevalence in per cent. EPG counts are given as means^SD. Where no SD value is given on the mean EPG count, there was only a single or few positive observations with the same EPG values,so that SD could not be calculated.
Labu Ungai-Bena Baisu Tambul Menifo(NG ¼ 14,NS ¼ 27)
(NG ¼ 15,NS ¼ 16)
(NG ¼ 22,NS ¼ 19)
(NG ¼ 4,NS ¼ 29)
(NG ¼ 0,NS ¼ 19)
P (%) EPG P (%) EPG P (%) EPG P (%) EPG P (%) EPG
GoatStrongyle 71.4 813 ^ 603 93.3 810 ^ 582 90.9 706 ^ 713 75 478 ^ 212 No dataStrongyloides 21.4 831 40 210 ^ 170 9.1 83 50 960 ^ 9961
Eimeria 21.4 221 ^ 95 20 249 ^ 143 13.6 138 ^ 48 0 0Fasciola 35.7 199 ^ 216 20 470 ^ 374 9.1 83 0 0Trichuris 14.3 125 ^ 59 0 0 0 0 0 0Moniezia 14.3 83 6.7 166 9.1 125 ^ 59 0 0Dictyocaulus 14.3 83 0 0 0 0 0 0Nematodirus 0 0 0 0 9.1 249 ^ 117 0 0
SheepStrongyle 66.7 406 ^ 570 68.8 445 ^ 677 78.9 603 ^ 389 69.0 1216 ^ 1585 52.6 1087 ^ 2303Strongyloides 3.7 1246 6.3 83 5.3 83 17.2 266 ^ 180 5.3 166Eimeria 25.9 95 ^ 311 25 374 ^ 220 0 0 6.9 125 ^ 59 31.6 1605 ^ 24531
Fasciola 11.1 166 6.25 83 0 0 6.9 83 0 0Trichuris 0 0 12.5 83 0 0 0 0 5.3 166Moniezia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Dictyocaulus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Nematodirus 0 0 0 0 5.3 83 6.9 125 ^ 59 0 0
1 Values are significantly different by ANOVA/Tukey’s HSD testing.
Table 3. GI parasite prevalence and mean eggs/g (EPG) counts stratified for sheep breed, agro-ecology and farmmanagement. N is the number of animals examined and prevalence (%) is the observed percentage of animals infested withone or more GI parasite types. EPG counts are given as mean ^ SD. Where no SD value is given for the mean EPG count,there was only a single or few positive observations with the same EPG values, so that SD could not be calculated.
Agro-ecology Farm management Sheep breed
Highlands Lowlands NARI Smallholder Priangan H/HalfbredN ¼ 124 N ¼ 41 N ¼ 115 N ¼ 50 N ¼ 27 N ¼ 83
Prevalence (%)Strongyle 75 68.3 74.8 70 66.7 67.5Strongyloides 14.5 9.8 12.2 16 3.7 9.6Eimeria 14.5 24.4 13.1 26 25.9 14.5Fasciola 6.5* 19.5* 10.4 8 11.1 3.6Trichuris 2.4 4.9 1.7 6 0 3.6Moniezia 2.4 4.9 3.5 2 0 0Dictyocaulus 0 4.9 1.7 0 0 0Nematodirus 4 0 4.3 0 0 3.6
EPGStrongyle 818 ^ 1156 551 ^ 605 748 ^ 942 775 ^ 1316 405 ^ 570 889 ^ 1412Strongyloides 278 ^ 375 374 ^ 582 357 ^ 491 189 ^ 151 1246 208 ^ 160Eimeria 696 ^ 1492* 133 ^ 80* 133 ^ 69* 913 ^ 1723* 95 ^ 32* 948 ^ 1796*Fasciola 228 ^ 283 187 ^ 165 152 ^ 141 374 ^ 362 166 83Trichuris 111 ^ 48 126 ^ 59 125 ^ 59 111 ^ 48 0 111 ^ 48Moniezia 138 ^ 48 83 104 ^ 42 166 0 0Dictyocaulus 0 83 83 0 0 0Nematodirus 166 ^ 102 0 166 0 0 111 ^ 48
NARI, National Agricultural Research Institute.H/Halfbred, Highlands Halfbred sheep.* Values are significantly different by either FET or t-test.
412 M. Koinari et al.
Appendix B Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
B-5
Fasciola. The mean EPG for Eimeria was higher in thehighlands than in the lowlands (t ¼ 2.1, P ¼ 0.045) andthe prevalence of Fasciola was higher in the lowlands thanhighlands (FET, P ¼ 0.028). There were no significantdifferences in prevalence or mean EPG between theinstitutional and smallholder farm management systemswith the exception for Eimeria. The mean EPG for Eimeriawas higher in the smallholder farms than NationalAgricultural Research Institute (NARI) farms (t ¼ 3.0,P ¼ 0.004). Similarly, no significant differences werefound in both parasite prevalence and mean EPGbetween sheep breeds, with the exception of Eimeriawhere the mean EPG in the Highlands Halfbred sheepwas higher than in Priangan sheep (t ¼ 2.1, P ¼ 0.045).
Discussion
The present study observed 78% of the examined farmanimals in PNG being infected with one or more types ofGI parasites. Similar infection rates for both sheep andgoats have been reported in other developing countries,such as Ethiopia and Kenya (Maichomo et al., 2004;Regassa et al., 2006). This high parasite prevalence may beattributed to poor farm management, e.g. little pasturerest time, poor nutrition and lack of anthelmintictreatment. At all study sites, mixed-species flocks grazedor browsed on natural forage on the same land for most ofthe time or were moved to other areas with only shortpasture rest times. Studies in Fiji, Tonga and Malaysiafound that nematodes have short survival times onpasture and suggested rotational grazing as an effectivemeasure for parasite control (Banks et al., 1990; Bargeret al., 1994; Cheah & Rajamanickam, 1997).
Natural pasture and shrubs in PNG are often not verynutritious and may contain anti-nutritive factors such astannin types, which restrict rather than enhance proteinavailability to the ruminant (Macfarlane, 2000). Signalgrass, for example, may cause hepatic dysfunction infarm animals (Macfarlane, 2000). The low-quality feedmay result in subsequent malnutrition which maynegatively affect the development of acquired immunityagainst GI parasites (Kyriazakis & Houdijk, 2006). We didnot observe significantly lower GI parasite prevalence atstudy sites with more frequent anthelminthic treatment.
Strongyles were the most abundant parasites detectedin this study. Strongyles, especially Haemonchus species,are highly fecund, laying up to 5000 eggs/day whereenvironmental factors are favourable (Gupta et al., 1987).The pre-parasitic stages of Haemonchus contortus developand survive better at mean monthly maximum tempera-tures $18.38C (Gupta et al., 1987). Our study sites havemean maximum annual temperatures ranging from 18.9to 31.18C with only little variation throughout the year,due to their proximity to the equator. Additionally, moststudy sites were very humid, which is likely to sustain thesurvival of the free-living stages of H. contortus, leading tohigh pasture contamination.
A previous study reported high prevalence (89%)of Eimeria in sheep from three locations in PNG (Varghese& Yayabu, 1985) whereas the present study found alower prevalence (21–36%) in similar areas. This may bedue to the different methodologies used for parasite
identification. In the present study a simple flotationprocedure was used, while in the previous study acentrifugation/flotation method was used which hasbeen reported to be more sensitive for detection of oocytesin faecal samples (Dryden et al., 2005). Notwithstanding,this is the first study to report Eimeria in goats in PNG. Wefound Eimeria in goats in all study sites except Tambul,where only four goats were screened, and Menifo, whereno goats were screened.
The trematode Fasciola was present in sheep and/orgoats from Labu, Ungai-Bena, Baisu and Tambul.A previous study in PNG found Fasciola in the areaof Aiyura and showed that the sheep there are exposed tocontinual (low-level) pasture contamination leadingto chronic fasciolosis at all times (Owen, 1989). In PNG,in all areas where the intermediate snail host, Lymnaeaspecies, exists, acute fasciolosis can occur in the wetseason, especially in areas where the land is not welldrained and the grazing pressure is high (Owen, 1989).
This is the first study reporting the prevalence ofDictyocaulus in sheep and goats in PNG. Some studieshave found that goats are more susceptible to Dictyocaulusthan sheep (Sharma, 1994; Berrag & Urquhart, 1996;Alemu et al., 2006). We found Dictyocaulus in 14% of goatsexamined in Labu (lowland). A similar prevalence hasbeen reported in Ethiopia in areas with an altitude,1500 m (Alemu et al., 2006).
We found higher overall infection levels in goatscompared to sheep. Goats were also infected with a widerspectrum of GI parasites. This contradicts some previousstudies that found a lower prevalence in goats (Kanyariet al., 2009; Khan et al., 2010; Abebe et al., 2011), butis in agreement with a number of other studies, whichalso reported higher parasite prevalence in goats (Regassaet al., 2006; Nwosu et al., 2007; Gadahi et al., 2009;Dagnachew et al., 2011). Hoste et al. (2008) suggested thatgoats do not develop resistance as efficiently as sheep andthis may be an explanation for our findings.
The EPG counts for Eimeria in PNG Priangan sheep(N ¼ 27) were significantly lower than those in theHighlands Halfbred sheep (N ¼ 83). It is difficult toascertain the mechanisms behind this difference,especially as, coincidentally, most PNG Priangan sheepsamples were collected in Labu, where anthelminthicdrug treatment was conducted more regularly. Never-theless, previous studies have shown that some indigen-ous sheep breeds exhibit higher levels of resistanceagainst GI parasites and this might partially explain thepresent findings (Baker & Gray, 2004). PNG Priangansheep are native to tropical climates, as they originatedfrom South-East Asia and have been exposed to GIparasites in PNG for over a century. In contrast,Highlands Halfbred sheep, which are crossbreeds of thePNG Priangan sheep and the temperate Corriedale andPerendale breeds, have only a fraction of this resistanceand will therefore be more susceptible to infection. Moredetailed studies on immunology and feeding behaviourof the different sheep breeds are required to elucidatethis problem further.
The information collected in this study is an importantupdate on GI parasite presence in sheep and goats inPNG. Future investigations should include longitudinalstudies and larger cohorts to further assess parasite
Gastrointestinal parasites in sheep and goats in Papua New Guinea 413
Appendix B Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
B-6
epidemiology in the diverse agro-climatic zones in thecountry. Molecular methods should be used to identifythe different species of GI parasites infecting sheep andgoats in PNG, thus extending previous studies (Varghese& Yayabu, 1985; Owen, 1988, 1989, 1998).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to sincerely thank the ownersof the herds and logistic support by the NationalAgricultural Research Institute, Department of Agricul-ture and Livestock in Eastern Highlands Province, andDivine Word University in Papua New Guinea. Thisresearch received no specific grant from any fundingagency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. This studywas approved by the Murdoch University Animal EthicsCommittee (Permit R2368/10).
References
Abebe, R., Gebreyohannes, M., Mekuria, S., Abunna, F.& Regassa, A. (2011) Gastrointestinal nematodeinfections in small ruminants under the traditionalhusbandry system during the dry season in southernEthiopia. Tropical Animal Health Production 42,1111–1117.
Alemu, S., Leykun, E.G., Ayelet, G. & Zeleke, A. (2006)Study on small ruminant lungworms in northeasternEthiopia. Veterinary Parasitology 142, 330–335.
Al-Quaisy, H.H., Al-Zubaidy, A.J., Altaif, K.I. &Makkawi, T.A. (1987) The pathogenicity of hae-monchosis in sheep and goats in Iraq: 1. Clinical,parasitological and haematological findings. VeterinaryParasitology 24, 221–228.
Baker, R.L. & Gray, G.D. (2004) Appropriate breeds andbreeding schemes for sheep and goats in the tropics.pp. 63–75 in Sani, R.A., Gray, G.D. & Baker, R.L. (Eds)Worm control for small ruminants in tropical Asia. ACIARMonograph No. 113. Canberra, Australian Centre forInternational Agricultural Research.
Banks, D.J., Singh, R., Barger, I.A., Pratap, B. &Le Jambre, L.F. (1990) Development and survivalof infective larvae of Haemonchus contortus andTrichostrongylus colubriformis on pasture in a tropicalenvironment. International Journal for Parasitology 20,155–160.
Barger, I.A., Siale, K., Banks, D.J. & Le Jambre, L.F.(1994) Rotational grazing for control of gastrointestinalnematodes of goats in a wet tropical environment.Veterinary Parasitology 53, 109–116.
Berrag, B. & Urquhart, G.M. (1996) Epidemiologicalaspects of lungworm infections of goats in Morocco.Veterinary Parasitology 61, 81–85.
Bourke, M.R. (2010) Altitudinal limits of 230 economiccrop species in Papua New Guinea. pp. 473–513in Haberle, S.G., Stevenson, J. & Prebble, M. (Eds)Altered ecologies: fire, climate and human influence onterrestrial landscapes. Canberra, The ANU E Press.
Cheah, T.S. & Rajamanickam, C. (1997) Epidemiology ofgastro-intestinal nematodes of sheep in wet tropicalconditions in Malaysia. Tropical Animal HealthProduction 29, 165–173.
Dagnachew, S., Amaute, A. & Temesgen, W. (2011)Epidemiology of gastrointestinal helminthiasis ofsmall ruminants in selected sites of North Gondarzone, Northwest Ethiopia. Ethiopian Veterinary Journal15, 57–68.
Dorny, P., Symoens, C., Jalila, A., Vercruysse, J. &Sani, R. (1995) Strongyle infections in sheep and goatsunder the traditional husbandry system in peninsularMalaysia. Veterinary Parasitology 56, 121–136.
Dryden, M.W., Payne, P.A., Ridley, R. & Smith, V. (2005)Comparison of common fecal flotation techniques forthe recovery of parasite eggs and oocysts. VeterinaryTherapeutics 6, 15–28.
Gadahi, J.A., Arshed, M.J., Ali, Q., Javaid, S.B. & Shah,S.I. (2009) Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites ofsheep and goat in and around Rawallpindi andIslamabad, Pakistan. Veterinary World 2, 21–53.
Gupta, R.P., Yadav, C.L. & Chaudhri, S.S. (1987)Epidemiology of gastrointestinal nematodes of sheepand goats in Haryana, India. Veterinary Parasitology 24,117–127.
Hoste, H., Torres-Acosta, J.F. & Aguilar-Caballero, A.J.(2008) Nutrition–parasite interactions in goats:is immunoregulation involved in the control ofgastrointestinal nematodes? Parasite Immunology 30,79–88.
Kanyari, P.W.N., Kagira, J.M. & Mhoma, R.J.(2009) Prevalence and intensity of endoparasites insmall ruminants kept by farmers in Kisumu Munici-pality, Kenya. Livestock Research for Rural Development21(11). Available at http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd21/11/kany21202.htm (accessed 15 January 2012).
Khan, M.N., Sajid, M.S., Khan, M.K., Iqbal, Z. &Hussain, A. (2010) Gastrointestinal helminthiasis:prevalence and associated determinants in domesticruminants of district Toba Tek Singh, Punjab, Pakistan.Parasitology Research 107, 787–794.
Kyriazakis, I. & Houdijk, J. (2006) Immunonutrition:nutritional control of parasites. Small RuminantResearch 62, 79–82.
Macfarlane, D. (2000) Country pasture/forage resourceprofiles Papua New Guinea FAO database. Available atwww.fao.org/ag/AGP/AGPC/doc/Counprof/southpacific/png.htm (accessed January 2012).
Maichomo, M.W., Kagira, J.M. & Walker, T. (2004) Thepoint prevalence of gastro-intestinal parasites incalves, sheep and goats in Magadi division, south-western Kenya. Onderstepoort Journal of VeterinaryResearch 71, 257–261.
McLeod, R.S. (1995) Costs of major parasites to theAustralian livestock industries. International Journal forParasitology 25, 1363–1367.
Nwosu, C.O., Madu, P.P. & Richards, W.S. (2007)Prevalence and seasonal changes in the population ofgastrointestinal nematodes of small ruminants in thesemi-arid zone of north-eastern Nigeria. VeterinaryParasitology 144, 118–124.
Owen, I.L. (1988) Field trials with closantel andHaemonchus contortus in sheep in Papua New Guinea.Australian Veterinary Journal 65, 267–270.
Owen, I.L. (1989) The epidemiology of fasciolosis inPapua New Guinea. Australian Veterinary Journal 66,58–60.
414 M. Koinari et al.
Appendix B Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
B-7
Owen, I.L. (1998) A study of the contamination of sheeppasture with nematode larvae in the highlands ofPapua New Guinea. Science in New Guinea 24, 3–9.
Quartermain, A.R. (2002) Conservation of domesticanimal genetic resources in Papua New Guinea.NARI Technical Bulletin Series, Technical Bulletin No. 4.Lae, National Agriculture Research Institute.
Quartermain, A.R. (2004) Internal parasites of smallruminants in Papua New Guinea. pp. 241–248 in Sani,R.A., Gray, G.D. & Baker, R.L. (Eds) Worm control forsmall ruminants in tropical Asia. ACIAR MonographNo. 113. Canberra, Australian Centre for InternationalAgricultural Research.
Regassa, F., Sori, T., Dhuguma, R. & Kiros, Y.(2006) Epidemiology of gastrointestinal parasites ofruminants in Western Oromia, Ethiopia. InternationalJournal of Applied Research in Veterinary Medicine 4,51–57.
Sharma, R.L. (1994) Parasitic bronchitis in goats andthe possible use of Dictyocaulus filaria vaccine for itscontrol. Veterinary Parasitology 51, 255–262.
Simpson, H.V. (2000) Pathophysiology of abomasalparasitism: is the host or parasite responsible?Veterinary Journal 160, 177–191.
Soulsby, E.J.L. (1965) Textbook of veterinary clinicalparasitology. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications.
Varghese, T. & Yayabu, R. (1985) Ovine coccidia inPapua New Guinea. Veterinary Parasitology 17,181–191.
Whitlock, H.V. (1948) Some modifications of theMcMaster helminth egg counting technique andapparatus. Journal of the Council for Scientific andIndustrial Research 21, 177–180.
Yadav, A.K. & Tandon, V. (1989) Gastrointestinal nematodeinfections of goats in a sub-tropical and humid zoneof India. Veterinary Parasitology 33, 135–142.
Gastrointestinal parasites in sheep and goats in Papua New Guinea 415
Appendix B Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
B-8
Appendix C Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
C-1
Appendix C
Cryptosporidium species in sheep and goats in Papua New Guinea.
Research Brief
Cryptosporidium species in sheep and goats from Papua New Guinea
M. Koinari a,⇑, A.J. Lymbery b, U.M. Ryan a
a School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australiab Fish Health Unit, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia
h i g h l i g h t s
� Detection of Cryptosporidium spp. inadult sheep and goats from PapuaNew Guinea using molecular tools.� In sheep, C. parvum, C. andersoni and
C. scrofarum were identified.� In goats, C. hominis, C. parvum, C. xiaoi
and rat genotype II were identified.� Subtypes detected were C. hominis
IdA15G1 and C. parvum IIaA15G2R1and IIaA19G4R1.
g r a p h i c a l a b s t r a c t
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:Received 9 December 2013Received in revised form 20 March 2014Accepted 24 March 2014Available online 3 April 2014
Keywords:CryptosporidiumSheepGoat18S rRNA60 kDa glycoproteinZoonoticPapua New Guinea
a b s t r a c t
Species of Cryptosporidium are extensively recognised as pathogens of domesticated livestock and poul-try, companion animals, wildlife, and are a threat to public health. Little is known of the prevalence ofCryptosporidium spp. in humans, domesticated animals or wildlife in Papua New Guinea (PNG). Theaim of the present study was to screen sheep and goats for Cryptosporidium using molecular tools. A totalof 504 faecal samples were collected from sheep (n = 276) and goats (n = 228) in village, government andinstitutional farms in PNG. Samples were screened by nested PCR and genotyped at the 18S rRNA and atthe 60 kDa glycoprotein (gp60) loci. The overall prevalences were 2.2% for sheep (6/278) and 4.4% (10/228) for goats. The species/genotypes identified were Cryptosporidium hominis (subtype IdA15G1) ingoats (n = 6), Cryptosporidium parvum (subtypes IIaA15G2R1and IIaA19G4R1) in sheep (n = 4) and ingoats (n = 2), Cryptosporidium andersoni (n = 1) and Cryptosporidium scrofarum (n = 1) in sheep, Cryptospo-ridium xiao (n = 1) and Cryptosporidium rat genotype II (n = 1) in goats. This is the first report of Cryptos-poridium spp. identified in sheep and goats in PNG. Identification of Cryptosporidium in livestock warrantsbetter care of farm animals to avoid contamination and illness in vulnerable population. The detection ofzoonotic Cryptosporidium in livestock suggests these animals may serve as reservoirs for human infection.
� 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Species of Cryptosporidium are globally distributed, zoonoticintestinal protozoan parasites that cause diarrheal disease in ani-mals and are one of the main causes of serious diarrhoea in chil-dren (Kotloff et al., 2013). Clinical effects of Cryptosporidium
infection, which include diarrhoea, weight loss and often deathin lambs and goat kids, severely impact the economy of sheepand goat farming (de Graaf et al., 1999).
Globally, the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in sheep canvary drastically from <5% to >70% (Robertson, 2009). Although few-er epidemiological studies have examined Cryptosporidium spp. ingoats, it appears that prevalence is similarly variable, with valuesof <10% to >40% reported (Robertson, 2009). At least eight Cryptos-poridium species have been identified in sheep faeces including
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2014.03.0210014-4894/� 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
⇑ Corresponding author. Fax: +61 89310 414.E-mail address: mkoinari@gmail.com (M. Koinari).
Experimental Parasitology 141 (2014) 134–137
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Experimental Parasitology
journal homepage: www.elsevier .com/locate /yexpr
Appendix C Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
C-2
Cryptosporidium parvum, Cryptosporidium hominis, Cryptosporidiumandersoni, Cryptosporidium suis, Cryptosporidium xiaoi, Cryptospori-dium fayeri, Cryptosporidium ubiquitum and Cryptosporidium scrofa-rum, with C. xiaoi, C. ubiquitum and C. parvum most prevalent (Ryanet al., 2005; Santin et al., 2007; Fayer and Santin, 2009; Giles et al.,2009; Yang et al., 2009; Robertson, 2009; Diaz et al., 2010a; Wanget al., 2010; Sweeny et al., 2011; Cacciò et al., 2013; Connelly et al.,2013). Three of these species; C. parvum, C. hominis and C. xiaoihave also been identified in goats (Giles et al., 2009; Robertson,2009; Diaz et al., 2010b).
Sheep and dairy goats were introduced to Papua New Guinea(PNG) in the early 19th century by colonial administrators andmissionaries (Quartermain, 2004). There are two predominantbreeds of sheep (PNG Priangan sheep and the Highlands Halfbred)and one breed of goat (PNG goat genotype) in PNG (Quartermain,2004). Currently, sheep and goats are raised in government sta-tions for breeding and distribution to smallholder farms and in re-search institutional farms. Little is known about Cryptosporidium insheep and goats in PNG and therefore the aim of the present studywas to determine the prevalence and genotypes of Cryptosporidiumin these two hosts in PNG.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Sample collection
Faecal samples from a total of 228 goats and 276 sheep werecollected from February 2011 to April 2011 from government,institutional and smallholder farms in a variety of agro-economiczones in PNG.
2.1.1. Farm managementThe flocks from the government (Menifo) and institutional
(Labu, Baisu and Tambul) farms grazed pasture in fenced areas(20–60 ha) at daytime. At night time, the flocks were kept inhouses with wooden, slatted floors in institutional farms and onthe ground in the government farm. At the time of sample collec-tion, the combined numbers of sheep and goats in Menifo, Labu,Baisu, and Tambul were 55, 125, 70 and 143, respectively. The sub-sistence farmers kept few animals, usually less than 20, whichgrazed free range or were tethered and housed at night on slattedfloors or on the ground underneath the farmer’s house. Most ani-mals grazed on native grasses and shrubs. Smallholder farmers alsofed their animals with starchy vegetables (mostly sweet potatoes).The animals drank from troughs (sourced from water supply orrainwater tanks), rainwater run-off water or ponds.
2.1.2. Herd health programsThe floors of the resting houses were not swept. The animals
were penned on dirty floor, ground or on bare concrete floors.The farmers at the institutions and government farms shearedtheir sheep, whereas, the smallholder farmers did not and ex-plained that they did not have the resources for it. Most farm man-agers reported that the most common signs of illness in theiranimals were diarrhoea and coughing, followed by itching and hairloss. The three large institutional flocks were drenched with benz-imidazole (Panacur) nominally at bimonthly intervals. At the timeof sampling, animals had been drenched 2 months previously inLabu, four months previously in Baisu and Tambul and 6 monthspreviously in Menifo. Most smallholder farmers did not knowabout causes of diseases in their sheep and goats or the use ofanthelmintic drugs for parasite control. For instance, a smallholderfarmer reported the death of his entire flock (n = 25) and noticednematode worms in the gut of a dead sheep.
All animals sampled were adults. Faecal samples were obtainedfrom the rectum of randomly selected animals and examined visu-ally for consistency, mucus and macroscopic parasites. All samplecollection methods used were approved by the Murdoch UniversityAnimal Ethics Committee (approval number R2368/10). The faecalsamples were preserved in 70% ethanol and transported to Mur-doch University, Australia, for further analysis.
2.2. DNA isolation and genotyping of Cryptosporidium sp
Total DNA was extracted from 250 mg of faeces using a Power-Soil� DNA Isolation Kit (MO BIO laboratories, Carlsbad, California,USA). All samples were screened for the presence of Cryptosporidi-um spp. at the 18S rRNA locus using a nested PCR as previously de-scribed (Morgan et al., 1997). C. parvum and C. hominis-positiveisolates were subtyped at the 60 kDa glycoprotein locus (gp60) asdescribed by Sulaiman et al. (2005). All positive isolates were se-quenced as previously described (Koinari et al., 2013).
3. Results
Cryptosporidium was detected in 2.2% (6/276; 95% CI 2.8–6.2) ofsheep and 4.4% (10/228; 95% CI 2.8–6.2) of goats at the 18S rRNAlocus. Three species of Cryptosporidium were detected in sheep,namely C. parvum (n = 4), C. andersoni (n = 1) and C. scrofarum(n = 1). Four species/genotypes were detected in goats; C. hominis(n = 6), C. parvum (n = 2), C. xiaoi (n = 1) and rat genotype II(n = 1) (Table 1). Rat genotype II, C. xiaoi, C. scrofarum and C. ander-soni isolates were detected in animals from smallholder farms. TheC. hominis isolates were from smallholder (n = 4) and institutional(n = 2) farms, while C. parvum was identified in animals from allthree types of farms; government (n = 1), institutional (n = 3) andsmallholder (n = 1). Analysis of the gp60 gene identified the pres-ence of two C. parvum subtypes; IIaA15G2R1 (n = 3) andIIaA19G4R1 (n = 2) in sheep and goats and a C. hominis subtype(IdA15G1) (n = 1) in a goat (Table 1). The partial 18S and gp60nucleotide sequences were deposited in the GenBank database un-der the accession numbers KJ584567–KJ584584.
4. Discussion
This is first study to identify and molecularly characterise Cryp-tosporidium in sheep and goats in PNG and analysis revealed a highdiversity of Cryptosporidium parasites within these animal popula-tions. The results of the present study complement recent findingsof C. parvum in fish from freshwater aquaculture, wild freshwaterand wild saltwater, and C. hominis in a wild marine fish in PNG(Koinari et al., 2013). The only other previous study of Cryptospori-dium in PNG identified Cryptosporidium antibodies in 24% of youngchildren from Goroka (Groves et al., 1994).
Although point prevalences were low for Cryptosporidium in thepresent study, the true prevalence may be underestimated as onlysingle faecal samples were screened at one time point and inter-mittent shedding and seasonal variation are common (O’Handleyet al., 1999). In addition, only adult animals were screened andprevalences are known to be much higher in younger animals(Santin et al., 2007). Most importantly, the identification of Cryp-tosporidium in livestock warrants better care of farm animals toavoid contamination and illness in vulnerable populations, as Cryp-tosporidium spp. are known for causing diarrhoea and mortality inyoung animals in both natural and artificial infections (de Graafet al., 1999; Quilez et al., 2008; Giles et al., 2009).
The three species (C. parvum, C. andersoni and C. scrofarum)identified in sheep from the present study have also been reportedin sheep in previous studies (Ryan et al., 2005; Santin et al., 2007;
M. Koinari et al. / Experimental Parasitology 141 (2014) 134–137 135
Appendix C Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
C-3
Quilez et al., 2008; Giles et al., 2009). In addition, C. andersoni is fre-quently reported in cattle and occasionally in humans, while C.scrofarum is commonly identified in pigs (Xiao, 2010). C. ubiquitumis a common species found in sheep in other countries (Ryan et al.,2005; Santin et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2010; Yang et al., 2009);however, it was not identified in the present study.
Three species, C. hominis, C. parvum and C. xiaoi, detected ingoats in the present study have also been reported in goats in otherstudies (Goma et al., 2007; Geurden et al., 2008; Quilez et al., 2008;Giles et al., 2009; Diaz et al., 2010b). For example, molecular anal-yses confirmed infections with C. hominis and C. parvum in diar-rheic goat kids in the UK (Giles et al., 2009) and C. parvum ingoats in Spain (Quilez et al., 2008). C. xiaoi is commonly reportedin sheep (Fayer and Santin, 2009) and occasionally in goats (Diazet al., 2010b). This is the first report of rat genotype II in goats.Rat genotype II has been reported in house rats in China (Lvet al., 2009), and in the Philippines (Ng-Hublin et al., 2013), brownrats in the Philippines (Ng-Hublin et al., 2013) and in wild blackrats in Northern Australia (Paparini et al., 2012). The goat in whichrat genotype II was identified was from a smallholder farm inBena–Bena, PNG. Smallholders usually keep their goats in nighthouses, which are built very close to their own homes in order toavoid theft. The goat could have acquired this genotype from thehouse rats; however, further studies are required to confirm thisand to determine if the goat was actually infected or just passingoocysts from ingestion of rat faeces. Identification of species suchas C. andersoni, C. scrofarum and C. xiaoi in smallholder flocks prob-ably reflects the management system. Typically, these small rumi-nants are tethered and/or allowed to graze freely on shrubs andgrasses along road sides, near homes and gardens, where theyshare the feeding grounds with other livestock, especially cattleand pigs.
C. hominis and C. parvum are the most common causes of cryp-tosporidiosis in humans worldwide (Xiao, 2010). In the presentstudy, C. hominis (subtype IdA15G1) was found in goats and C. par-vum (subtypes IIaA15G2R1 and IIaA19G4R1) was found in bothsheep and goats. Both the C. parvum IIa subtypes and C. hominisId subtype identified in the present study were previously identi-fied in fish in PNG (Koinari et al., 2013). The C. parvum subtypeIIaA15G2R1, has been reported in sheep and goats in previousstudies in Belgium, Spain, Brazil, China and Australia (Diaz et al.,2010a; Geurden et al., 2008; Paz et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2014;Ye et al., 2014). C. parvum subtype IIaA15G2R1 is a common sub-type in cattle and humans (Feng et al., 2013; Xiao, 2010) in theAmericas, Europe, Northern Africa and Asia (Alyousefi et al.,2013; Amer et al., 2010; Brook et al., 2009; Diaz et al., 2010a; Geur-den et al., 2009; Helmy et al., 2013; Iqbal et al., 2012; Meireles
et al., 2011; Quilez et al., 2008; Rahmouni et al., 2014; Rieuxet al., 2013; Santin et al., 2008; Soba and Logar, 2008). It has alsobeen found in yak in China (Mi et al., 2013) and in buffalo in Egypt(Helmy et al., 2013). The C. parvum subtype IIaA19G4R1 was iden-tified in both a goat and a sheep in the present study. Previously, C.parvum subtype IIaA19G4R1 was identified in cattle in NorthernIreland (Thompson et al., 2007) and Australia (Ng et al., 2008)and freshwater fish (tilapia and silver barb) from PNG (Koinariet al., 2013).
These findings suggest that sheep and goats may be importantreservoirs of C. hominis and zoonotic C. parvum subtypes in PNG.The detection of C. hominis in goats presumably reflects the veryclose association between humans and goats. Further research isnecessary to characterise the prevalence of various Cryptosporidi-um species and genotypes in young lambs, goats and cattle andother hosts such as humans to more fully understand the transmis-sion dynamics of Cryptosporidium in PNG.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the staff of National Agriculture ResearchInstitute (NARI), especially Dr. Workneh Ayalew for logistical sup-port and advice, Atmaleo Aguyanto and Martin Lobao for assistancewith sampling of animals and the staff of Department of Agricul-ture and Livestock for their assistance during sampling in PapuaNew Guinea. Also, we would like to thank Josephine Ng-Hublinand Dr. Rongchang Yang at Murdoch University, Australia, for theiradvice with the molecular work.
References
Alyousefi, N.A., Mahdy, M.A., Lim, Y.A., Xiao, L., Mahmud, R., 2013. First molecularcharacterization of Cryptosporidium in Yemen. Parasitology 140, 729–734.
Amer, S., Honma, H., Ikarashi, M., Tada, C., Fukuda, Y., Suyama, Y., Nakai, Y., 2010.Cryptosporidium genotypes and subtypes in dairy calves in Egypt. Vet. Parasitol.169, 382–386.
Brook, E.J., Anthony Hart, C., French, N.P., Christley, R.M., 2009. Molecularepidemiology of Cryptosporidium subtypes in cattle in England. Vet. J. 179,378–382.
Cacciò, S.M., Sannella, A.R., Mariano, V., Valentini, S., Berti, F., Tosini, F., Pozio, E.,2013. A rare Cryptosporidium parvum genotype associated with infection oflambs and zoonotic transmission in Italy. Vet. Parasitol. 191, 128–131.
Connelly, L., Craig, B.H., Jones, B., Alexander, C.L., 2013. Genetic diversity ofCryptosporidium spp. within a remote population of Soay Sheep on St. KildaIslands, Scotland. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 2240–2246.
de Graaf, D.C., Vanopdenbosch, E., Ortega-Mora, L.M., Abbassi, H., Peeters, J.E., 1999.A review of the importance of cryptosporidiosis in farm animals. Int. J. Parasitol.29, 1269–1287.
Diaz, P., Quilez, J., Chalmers, R.M., Panadero, R., Lopez, C., Sanchez-Acedo, C.,Morrondo, P., Diez-Banos, P., 2010a. Genotype and subtype analysis ofCryptosporidium isolates from calves and lambs in Galicia (NW Spain).Parasitology 137, 1187–1193.
Table 1Species and subtypes of Cryptosporidium identified in sheep and goats in the present study.
Sample Host Species identified at the 18S locus Type of farm gp60 subtype
GE51 Goat C. hominis Smallholder _GE53 Goat C. hominis Smallholder _GE66 Goat C. hominis Smallholder _GE78 Goat C. hominis Smallholder IdA15G1GM14 Goat C. hominis Research institution _GW10 Goat C. hominis Research institution _GM35 Goat C. parvum Research institution IIaA19G4R1GW19 Goat C. parvum Research institution IIaA15G2R1SW29 Sheep C. parvum Research institution _SE03 Sheep C. parvum Government IIaA15G2R1SE83 Sheep C. parvum Smallholder IIaA15G2R1SW106 Sheep C. parvum Research institution IIaA19G4R1SE67 Sheep C. scrofarum Smallholder _SE79 Sheep C. andersoni Smallholder _GE102 Goat C. xiaoi Smallholder _GE01 Goat Rat genotype II Smallholder _
136 M. Koinari et al. / Experimental Parasitology 141 (2014) 134–137
Appendix C Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
C-4
Diaz, P., Quilez, J., Robinson, G., Chalmers, R.M., Diez-Banos, P., Morrondo, P., 2010b.Identification of Cryptosporidium xiaoi in diarrhoeic goat kids (Capra hircus) inSpain. Vet. Parasitol. 172, 132–134.
Fayer, R., Santin, M., 2009. Cryptosporidium xiaoi n. sp. (Apicomplexa:Cryptosporidiidae) in sheep (Ovis aries). Vet. Parasitol. 164, 192–200.
Feng, Y., Torres, E., Li, N., Wang, L., Bowman, D., Xiao, L., 2013. Population geneticcharacterisation of dominant Cryptosporidium parvum subtype IIaA15G2R1. Int.J. Parasitol. 43, 1141–1147.
Geurden, T., Thomas, P., Casaert, S., Vercruysse, J., Claerebout, E., 2008. Prevalenceand molecular characterisation of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in lambs andgoat kids in Belgium. Vet. Parasitol. 155, 142–145.
Geurden, T., Levecke, B., Caccio, S.M., Visser, A., De Groote, G., Casaert, S., Vercruysse,J., Claerebout, E., 2009. Multilocus genotyping of Cryptosporidium and Giardia innon-outbreak related cases of diarrhoea in human patients in Belgium.Parasitology 136, 1161–1168.
Giles, M., Chalmers, R., Pritchard, G., Elwin, K., Mueller-Doblies, D., Clifton-Hadley,F., 2009. Cryptosporidium hominis in a goat and a sheep in the UK. Vet. Rec. 164,24–25.
Goma, F.Y., Geurden, T., Siwila, J., Phiri, I.G.K., Claerebout, E., Vercruysse, J., 2007.The prevalence and molecular characterisation of Cryptosporidium spp. in smallruminants in Zambia. Small Ruminant Res. 72, 77–80.
Groves, V.J., Lehmann, D., Gilbert, G.L., 1994. Seroepidemiology of cryptosporidiosisin children in Papua New Guinea and Australia. Epidemiol. Infect. 113, 491–499.
Helmy, Y.A., Krucken, J., Nockler, K., von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G., Zessin, K.H.,2013. Molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium in livestock animals andhumans in the Ismailia Province of Egypt. Vet. Parasitol. 93, 15–24.
Iqbal, A., Lim, Y.A., Surin, J., Sim, B.L., 2012. High diversity of Cryptosporidiumsubgenotypes identified in Malaysian HIV/AIDS individuals targeting gp60gene. PloS One 7, e31139.
Koinari, M., Karl, S., Ng-Hublin, J., Lymbery, A.J., Ryan, U.M., 2013. Identification ofnovel and zoonotic Cryptosporidium species in fish from Papua New Guinea. Vet.Parasitol. 198, 1–9.
Kotloff, K.L., Nataro, J.P., Blackwelder, W.C., Nasrin, D., Farag, T.H., Panchalingam, S.,Wu, Y., Sow, S.O., Sur, D., Breiman, R.F., Faruque, A.S., Zaidi, A.K., Saha, D., Alonso,P.L., Tamboura, B., Sanogo, D., Onwuchekwa, U., Manna, B., Ramamurthy, T.,Kanungo, S., Ochieng, J.B., Omore, R., Oundo, J.O., Hossain, A., Das, S.K., Ahmed,S., Qureshi, S., Quadri, F., Adegbola, R.A., Antonio, M., Hossain, M.J., Akinsola, A.,Mandomando, I., Nhampossa, T., Acacio, S., Biswas, K., O’Reilly, C.E., Mintz, E.D.,Berkeley, L.Y., Muhsen, K., Sommerfelt, H., Robins-Browne, R.M., Levine, M.M.,2013. Burden and aetiology of diarrhoeal disease in infants and young childrenin developing countries (the Global Enteric Multicenter Study, GEMS): aprospective, case-control study. Lancet 382, 209–222.
Lv, C., Zhang, L., Wang, R., Jian, F., Zhang, S., Ning, C., Wang, H., Feng, C., Wang, X.,Ren, X., Qi, M., Xiao, L., 2009. Cryptosporidium spp. in wild, laboratory, and petrodents in China: prevalence and molecular characterization. Appl. Environ.Microbiol. 75, 7692–7699.
Meireles, M.V., de Oliveira, F.P., Teixeira, W.F., Coelho, W.M., Mendes, L.C., 2011.Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy calves from theState of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Parasitol. Res. 109, 949–951.
Mi, R., Wang, X., Li, C., Huang, Y., Zhou, P., Li, Z., Lei, M., Cai, J., Chen, Z., 2013.Prevalence and genetic characterization of Cryptosporidium in yaks in QinghaiProvince of China. PloS One 8, e74985.
Morgan, U.M., Constantine, C.C., Forbes, D.A., Thompson, R.C., 1997. Differentiationbetween human and animal isolates of Cryptosporidium parvum using rDNAsequencing and direct PCR analysis. J. Parasitol. 83, 825–830.
Ng, J., Eastwood, K., Durrheim, D., Massey, P., Walker, B., Armson, A., Ryan, U., 2008.Evidence supporting zoonotic transmission of Cryptosporidium in rural NewSouth Wales. Exp. Parasitol. 119, 192–195.
Ng-Hublin, J.S., Singleton, G.R., Ryan, U., 2013. Molecular characterization ofCryptosporidium spp. from wild rats and mice from rural communities in thePhilippines. Infect. Genet. Evol. 16, 5–12.
O’Handley, R.M., Cockwill, C., McAllister, T.A., Jelinski, M., Morck, D.W., Olson, M.E.,1999. Duration of naturally acquired giardiosis and cryptosporidiosis in dairycalves and their association with diarrhoea. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 214, 391–396.
Paparini, A., Jackson, B., Ward, S., Young, S., Ryan, U.M., 2012. MultipleCryptosporidium genotypes detected in wild black rats (Rattus rattus) fromnorthern Australia. Exp. Parasitol. 131, 404–412.
Paz, E.S.F.M., Lopes, R.S., Bresciani, K.D., Amarante, A.F., Araujo Jr., J.P., 2014. Highoccurrence of Cryptosporidium ubiquitum and Giardia duodenalis genotype E insheep from Brazil. Acta Parasitol. 59, 193–196.
Quartermain, A.R., 2004. Conservation of domestic animal genetic resources inPapua New Guinea. In: NARI Technical Bulletin Series. Lae, National AgricultureResearch Institute, pp. iv + 31.
Quilez, J., Torres, E., Chalmers, R.M., Hadfield, S.J., Del Cacho, E., Sanchez-Acedo, C.,2008. Cryptosporidium genotypes and subtypes in lambs and goat kids in Spain.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 6026–6031.
Rahmouni, I., Essid, R., Aoun, K., Bouratbine, A., 2014. Glycoprotein 60 diversity inCryptosporidium parvum causing human and cattle cryptosporidiosis in the ruralregion of Northern Tunisia. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 90, 346–350.
Rieux, A., Paraud, C., Pors, I., Chartier, C., 2013. Molecular characterization ofCryptosporidium isolates from pre-weaned calves in western France in relationto age. Vet. Parasitol. 197, 7–12.
Robertson, L.J., 2009. Giardia and Cryptosporidium infections in sheep and goats: areview of the potential for transmission to humans via environmentalcontamination. Epidemiol. Infect. 137, 913–921.
Ryan, U.M., Bath, C., Robertson, I., Read, C., Elliot, A., McInnes, L., Traub, R., Besier, B.,2005. Sheep may not be an important zoonotic reservoir for Cryptosporidiumand Giardia parasites. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 4992–4997.
Santin, M., Trout, J.M., Fayer, R., 2007. Prevalence and molecular characterization ofCryptosporidium and Giardia species and genotypes in sheep in Maryland. Vet.Parasitol. 146, 17–24.
Santin, M., Trout, J.M., Fayer, R., 2008. A longitudinal study of cryptosporidiosis indairy cattle from birth to 2 years of age. Vet. Parasitol. 155, 15–23.
Soba, B., Logar, J., 2008. Genetic classification of Cryptosporidium isolates fromhumans and calves in Slovenia. Parasitology 135, 1263–1270.
Sulaiman, I.M., Hira, P.R., Zhou, L., Al-Ali, F.M., Al-Shelahi, F.A., Shweiki, H.M., Iqbal,J., Khalid, N., Xiao, L., 2005. Unique endemicity of cryptosporidiosis in childrenin Kuwait. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43, 2805–2809.
Sweeny, J.P., Ryan, U.M., Robertson, I.D., Yang, R., Bell, K., Jacobson, C., 2011.Longitudinal investigation of protozoan parasites in meat lamb farms insouthern Western Australia. Prev. Vet. Med. 101, 192–203.
Thompson, H.P., Dooley, J.S., Kenny, J., McCoy, M., Lowery, C.J., Moore, J.E., Xiao, L.,2007. Genotypes and subtypes of Cryptosporidium spp. in neonatal calves inNorthern Ireland. Parasitol. Res. 100, 619–624.
Wang, Y., Feng, Y., Cui, B., Jian, F., Ning, C., Wang, R., Zhang, L., Xiao, L., 2010. Cervinegenotype is the major Cryptosporidium genotype in sheep in China. Parasitol.Res. 106, 341–347.
Xiao, L., 2010. Molecular epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis: an update. Exp.Parasitol. 124, 80–89.
Yang, R., Jacobson, C., Gordon, C., Ryan, U., 2009. Prevalence and molecularcharacterisation of Cryptosporidium and Giardia species in pre-weaned sheep inAustralia. Vet. Parasitol. 161, 19–24.
Yang, R., Jacobson, C., Gardner, G., Carmichael, I., Campbell, A.J., Ng-Hublin, J., Ryan,U., 2014. Longitudinal prevalence, oocyst shedding and molecularcharacterisation of Cryptosporidium species in sheep across four states inAustralia. Vet. Parasitol. 200, 50–58.
Ye, J., Xiao, L., Wang, Y., Wang, L., Amer, S., Roellig, D.M., Guo, Y., Feng, Y., 2014.Periparturient transmission of Cryptosporidium xiaoi from ewes to lambs. Vet.Parasitol. 197, 627–633.
M. Koinari et al. / Experimental Parasitology 141 (2014) 134–137 137
Appendix C Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
C-5
Appendix D Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
D-1
Appendix D Identification of novel and zoonotic Cryptosporidium species in fish
from Papua New Guinea.
Veterinary Parasitology 198 (2013) 1– 9
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Veterinary Parasitology
jo u r nal homep age: www.elsev ier .com/ locate /vetpar
Identification of novel and zoonotic Cryptosporidium speciesin fish from Papua New Guinea
M. Koinari a,∗, S. Karlb, J. Ng-Hublina, A.J. Lymberyc, U.M. Ryana
a School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australiab School of Medicine and Pharmacology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australiac Fish Health Unit, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:Received 26 March 2013Received in revised form 28 August 2013Accepted 30 August 2013
Keywords:CryptosporidiumFish18S rRNAgp60Novel genotypeZoonotic
a b s t r a c t
There is still limited information on the distribution of Cryptosporidium species and geno-types in fish. The present study investigated the prevalence of Cryptosporidium species incultured freshwater (n = 132), wild freshwater (n = 206) and wild marine (n = 276) fish inPapua New Guinea (PNG) by PCR screening at the 18S rRNA locus. A total of seven fish (2cultured freshwater, 1 wild freshwater and 4 wild marine fish) were identified as positive forCryptosporidium. Specifically, Cryptosporidium was found in four different host species (Niletilapia, Oreochromis niloticus; silver barb, Puntius gonionotus; mackerel scad, Decapterusmaracellus and oblong silver biddy, Gerres oblongus), giving an overall prevalence of 1.14%(95% CI: 0.3–2%, n = 7/614). Of the seven positive isolates, five were identified as C. parvumand two were a novel piscine genotype, which we have named piscine genotype 8. Piscinegenotype 8 was identified in two marine oblong silver biddies and exhibited 4.3% geneticdistance from piscine genotype 3 at the 18S locus. Further subtyping of C. parvum iso-lates at the 60 kDa glycoprotein (gp60) locus identified 3 C. parvum subtypes (IIaA14G2R1,IIaA15G2R1 and IIaA19G4R1) all of which are zoonotic and a C. hominis subtype (IdA15G1).The zoonotic Cryptosporidium were identified in fish samples from all three groups; culturedand wild freshwater and wild marine fish. Detection of Cryptosporidium among aquaculturefingerlings warrants further research to gain a better understanding of the epidemiologyof Cryptosporidium infection in cultured fish. The identification of zoonotic Cryptosporid-ium genotypes in fish from PNG has important public health implications and should beinvestigated further.
© 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The apicomplexan protozoan parasite Cryptosporidiuminfects a wide range of mammals, birds, reptiles andfish, primarily causing diarrhoea in mammals, diarrhoeaand/or catarrhal respiratory signs in birds and gastritis
∗ Corresponding author at: Division of Health Sciences, School ofVeterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WesternAustralia 6150, Australia. Tel.: +61 89360 6379; fax: +61 89310 414.
E-mail addresses: mkoinari@gmail.com, M.Koinari@murdoch.edu.au(M. Koinari).
in reptiles and possibly fish (O’Donoghue, 1995; Ryan,2010). Cryptosporidium has been described in more than17 species of both fresh and salt water fish with parasiticstages located deep within and on the surface of thestomach or intestinal epithelium (Alvarez-Pellitero andSitja-Bobadilla, 2002; Alvarez-Pellitero et al., 2004; Ryanet al., 2004; Murphy et al., 2009; Reid et al., 2010; Zangueeet al., 2010; Morine et al., 2012). In fish, Cryptosporidiumcan cause high morbidity with clinical signs includingvariable levels of emaciation, poor growth rates, swollencoelomic cavities, anorexia, listlessness and increasedmortality (Murphy et al., 2009).
0304-4017/$ – see front matter © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.08.031
Appendix D Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
D-2
2 M. Koinari et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 198 (2013) 1– 9
Table 1Species/genotypes of Cryptosporidium reported in fish in previous studies (N = the number of specimens in which each species/genotype of Cryptosporidiumwas identified).
Species/genotype N Fish host References
C. molnari >100 Gilthead sea bream and European seabass Alvarez-Pellitero and Sitja-Bobadilla(2002), Palenzuela et al. (2010)
C. scophthalmi 49 Turbot Alvarez-Pellitero and Sitja-Bobadilla(2002), Alvarez-Pellitero et al. (2004)
C. molnari-like 7 Butter bream, madder seaperch, bristle tooth tang,upsidedown catfish, wedgetailed blue tang and greenchromas, golden algae eater
Zanguee et al. (2010)
Piscine genotype 1 2 Guppy and neon tetra Ryan et al. (2004), Zanguee et al. (2010)Piscine genotype 2 >5 Angelfish, neon tetra and Oscar fish Murphy et al. (2009), Zanguee et al. (2010)Piscine genotype 3 2 Sea mullet Reid et al. (2010)Piscine genotype 4 4 Golden algae eater, kupang damsel, Oscar fish and
neon tetraZanguee et al. (2010), Morine et al. (2012)
Piscine genotype 5 3 Angelfish, butter bream and golden algae eater Zanguee et al. (2010)Piscine genotype 6 1 Guppy Zanguee et al. (2010)Piscine genotype 6-like 1 Gold gourami Morine et al. (2012)Piscine genotype 7 3 Red-eye tetra Morine et al. (2012)Rat genotype 3-like Goldfish Morine et al. (2012)C. scrofarum 2 School whiting Reid et al. (2010)C. parvum 1 School whiting Reid et al. (2010)C. xiaoi 1 School whiting Reid et al. (2010)
Currently the only recognised species infecting fishis Cryptosporidium molnari, which was identified ingilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) and European seabass (Dicentrarchus labarx) (Alvarez-Pellitero and Sitja-Bobadilla, 2002) and was characterised genetically in2010 (Palenzuela et al., 2010). C. molnari primarily infectsthe epithelium of the stomach and seldom the intes-tine (Alvarez-Pellitero and Sitja-Bobadilla, 2002). In 2004,C. scophthalmi was described in turbot (Psetta maxima.syn. Scopthalmus maximus) (Alvarez-Pellitero and Sitja-Bobadilla, 2002; Alvarez-Pellitero et al., 2004). However,no genetic sequences are available for C. scophthalmi and itcan thus not be considered a valid species due to the highgenetic heterogeneity and morphological similarity amongCryptosporidium species in fish. In addition to C. molnari, atotal of 3 species and 10 genotypes have been characterisedgenetically in fish (Table 1).
Fish are an important part of the diet and a sourceof income especially for people living on the coast andalong the rivers in Papua New Guinea (PNG). Freshwaterfish farming began in the 1960s with the introduction ofcarp and trout species; however, difficulties due to lackof knowledge among farmers impeded farming progressand the spread of its nutritional and financial benefits torural communities (Smith, 2007). Since 1995, the num-ber of inland aquaculture operations has increased in PNGdue to international programmes that involve the expan-sion of hatcheries, training of farmers and the introductionof new fish species (Smith, 2007). To date, very littleis known about the prevalence and genotypes of Cryp-tosporidium in fish or other animals in PNG (Owen, 2005;Koinari et al., 2012, 2013). The present study represents adetailed investigation of the prevalence and genetic charac-terisation of Cryptosporidium in cultured freshwater, wildfreshwater and wild marine fish sampled from a numberof different locations throughout PNG. It is therefore thefirst comprehensive study describing the distribution ofCryptosporidium species in PNG.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Sample collection
A total of 614 fish from cultured freshwater, wild fresh-water and wild marine environments were collected inPNG between February and August 2011 (Fig. 1). Cul-tured fish (n = 133) included three species, which werecollected from four smallholder fish ponds in Kundiawa,Asaro, Mumeng and Bathem (Table 2). Wild freshwaterfish (n = 205) included six species and were collected fromthe Ramu and Sepik Rivers, while 276 wild marine fishconsisting of 16 species were bought from local fisher-men in Bilbil, Madang, Tavana and Pilapila (Table 2). Onaverage, time lag between collection or purchasing andprocessing of the fish was up to 4 h. All sampling was con-ducted under Murdoch University Animal Ethics permitR2369/10.
The fish were weighed, measured (length and weight)and dissected. Sections of intestine and stomach were cutusing a sterile scalpel blade for each fish, placed in 2 mLEppendorf tubes and preserved in 70% ethanol for molec-ular screening. The remaining stomach and intestine werefixed in 10% buffered formalin for histological analysis. Allsamples were stored at 4 ◦C in PNG until sample collec-tion was completed. The samples were then transportedto Murdoch University, Perth, Australia and stored at 4 ◦Cuntil analysis.
2.2. DNA isolation
The preserved intestines and stomachs were washed5 times with water to remove ethanol and the epithe-lial layers were scraped using a sterile scalpel blade foreach fish. DNA was extracted from 25 mg of intestinal andstomach scrapings using a PowerSoil® DNA Isolation Kit(MO BIO laboratories, Carlsbad, California, USA) accordingto the manufacturer’s instructions and incorporating five
Appendix D Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
D-3
M. Koinari et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 198 (2013) 1– 9 3
Fig. 1. Map of the study sites in Papua New Guinea. Cultured freshwater fish were obtained from Bathem, Kundiawa, Asaro and Mumeng; wild freshwaterfish were collected in the Ramu River near Sausi and the Sepik River near Pagwi and marine fish were collected from Bilbil, Madang, Pilapila and Tavana.
Appendix D Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
D-4
4 M. Koinari et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 198 (2013) 1– 9
Table 2Cultured freshwater, wild freshwater and marine fish species collected in the present study.
Cultured freshwater fish Locations
Kundiawa Asaro Mumeng Bathem Total
Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) 36 20 27 – 83Common carp (Cyprinus carpia) – 11 32 – 43Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis massambic) – – – 7 7
Total 36 31 59 7 133
Wild freshwater fish Ramu River Sepik River Total
Silver barb (Puntius gonionotus) 13 39 52Highfin catfish (Neoarius berneyi) – 20 20Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis massambic) – 15 15Pacu (Colossoma bidens) – 34 34Indo-Pacific trapon (Megalops cyprinoides) – 70 70Redtail catfish (Phractocephalus hemioliopterus) – 14 14
Total 13 192 205
Wild marine fish Bilbil Madang Pilapila Tavana Total
Bigeye scad (Selar crumenopthalmus) 46 – 60 – 106Bigeye trevally (Caranx sexfasciatus) 4 – – – 4Blackfin barracuda (Sphyraena qenie) 9 – – – 9Coachwhip trevally (Carangoides oblongus) – – – 1 1Indo-Pacific trapon (Megalops cyprinoides) 4 – – – 4Mackerel scad (Decapterus macarellus) 5 – 24 – 29Oblong silver biddy (Gerres oblongus) 1 – – 54 55Oriental bonito (Sarda orientalis) – 4 – – 4Pinjalo snapper (Pinjalo pinjalo) – – 1 – 1Rainbow runner (Elagatis bipinnulatus) – 5 – – 5Reef needlefish (Strongylura incisa) – 4 – – 4Slender pinjalo (Pinjalo lewisi) – – – 14 14Spanish mackerel (Scomberomous maculatus) – 3 – – 3Talang queenfish (Scomberoides commersonnianus) – – 2 – 2Wahoo (Acanthocybium solandri) – 1 – – 1Yellow fin tuna (Thunnus albacares) – 34 – – 34
Total 69 51 87 69 276
freeze–thaw cycles as described previously (Ng et al., 2006)to break open the Cryptosporidium oocysts. DNA was elutedin 50 �L of elution buffer. All extracted samples were storedat −20 ◦C until required for screening.
2.3. Cryptosporidium genotyping and subtyping
All 614 samples from fish were screened for thepresence of Cryptosporidium at the 18S rRNA locus as pre-viously described (Morgan et al., 1999). Prevalences wereexpressed as a percentage of positive samples; with 95%confidence intervals calculated assuming a binomial dis-tribution, using the software Quantitative Parasitology 3.0(Rozsa et al., 2000). Isolates that were positive at the 18Slocus were subtyped at the 60 kDa glycoprotein (gp60)locus using primers which produce an 850 bp product(Alves et al., 2003); however, amplification was unsuc-cessful and a shorter (400 bp) product was amplified asdescribed by Sulaiman et al. (2005).
Positive isolates were also amplified at the actin locus.New primers were designed specifically based on actingene sequences of piscine-derived Cryptosporidium anda semi-nested PCR protocol was used. For the primaryPCR, a PCR product of ∼392 bp was amplified using theforward primer ActinallF1 (5′-GTAAATATACAGGCAGTT-3′)
and reverse primer ActinallR1 (5′-GGTTGGAACAATGCTTC-3′). Each PCR was performed in a reaction volume of 25 �Lusing 1 �L of DNA, 1× PCR buffer (Kapa Biosystems, CapeTown, South Africa), 2.0 mM MgCl2, 200 �M (each) dNTP(Fisher Biotech, Perth, Australia), 12.5 pmol of forward andreverse primers and 0.5 U of kapa Taq DNA polymerase(Kapa Biosystems, Cape Town, South Africa). Forty-fivePCR cycles (95 ◦C for 30 s, 46 ◦C for 30 s, 72 ◦C for 30 s)were performed using a Perkin Elmer Gene Amp PCR 2400thermocycler with an initial hot start (95 ◦C for 4 min)and a final extension (72 ◦C for 7 min). For the secondaryPCR, a fragment of ∼278 bp was amplified using 1 �L ofprimary PCR product with forward primer ActinallF2 (5′-CCTCATGCTATAATGAG-3′) and reverse primer ActinallR1.The conditions used for the secondary PCR were identicalto those for the primary PCR.
Secondary PCR products were separated by gel elec-trophoresis and purified using a simple tip elution method.Briefly, the PCR product was excised from the gel usinga scalpel blade and purified using an in house filter tipmethod and used for sequencing without any furtherpurification as previously described (Yang et al., 2013). DNAsequencing was performed using the ABI Prism BigDye®
terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Fos-ter City, CA, USA) on an Applied Biosystems 3730 DNA
Appendix D Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
D-5
M. Koinari et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 198 (2013) 1– 9 5
Analyser instrument. Nucleotide sequences were ana-lysed using FinchTV 1.4.0 (Geospiza, Inc., Seattle, WA,USA; http://www.geospiza.com) and aligned with refer-ence genotypes retrieved from GenBank using ClustalOmega (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/).
Phylogenetic trees were constructed using additionalsequences retrieved from GenBank. Distance estimationwas conducted using MEGA5 (Tamura et al., 2011) basedon evolutionary distances calculated using the p distancemodel (Nei and Zhang, 2006) and grouped using neighbour-joining. Parsimony and maximum likelihood analyses werealso conducted using the MEGA5 software. Reliabilities forthe trees were tested using 1000 bootstrap replications(Felsenstein, 1985) and bootstrap values exceeding 70 wereconsidered well supported (Hills and Bull, 1993).
2.4. Microscopy
Sections of intestinal and stomach tissues fixed in 10%formalin were embedded in paraffin. Histological sectionswere cut at 5 �m thicknesses, stained with haematoxylinand eosin and examined with an Olympus BX50 lightmicroscope at 400 and 1000 fold magnification.
3. Results
3.1. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium in fish hosts
Of the 614 fish sampled, seven (1.14%, 95% CI 0.3–2%)were positive by PCR, of which, two (0.33%, 95% CI0.09–1.2%) were cultured fingerlings, one (0.16%, 95% CI0.03–0.9%) was a wild freshwater species and four (0.65%,95% CI 0.25–1.66%) were wild marine species. Among thefish hosts infected were: two Nile tilapias (Oreochromisniloticus) with a prevalence of 2.4% (95% CI = 0–5.7%; 2/83)from fish ponds in Kundiawa and Mumeng; one silver barb(Puntius gonionotus) from Sepik River with a prevalenceof 1.9% (95% CI = 0–5.7%; 1/52); two oblong silver biddies(Gerres oblongus) from Bilbil and Tavana with a prevalenceof 3.6% (95% CI = 0–8.5%; 2/55) and two mackerel scads(Decapterus macarellus) from Pilapila with a prevalence of6.9% (95% CI = 0–16.1%; 2/29) (Fig. 1).
3.2. Sequence and phylogenetic analysis of the 18S rDNA,gp60 and actin genes
Sequence analysis identified C. parvum (5 isolates: Niletilapia ON36 and ON68, mackerel scad DM17 and DM18,and silver barb PG37) and a novel piscine genotype (2
Table 4Percentage of genetic differences between piscine genotype 8 and otherCryptosporidium species/genotypes at the 18S rRNA and actin loci.
18S locus Actin locus
Piscine genotype 1 13.0 17.4Piscine genotype 2 5.1 Not analyseda
Piscine genotype 3 4.3 Not analyseda
Piscine genotype 4 6.3 Not analyseda
Piscine genotype 5 5.5 Not analyseda
Piscine genotype 6 13.0 Not analyseda
Piscine genotype 7 11.8 Not analyseda
C. molnari 10.8 7.3–8.5C. parvum 15.4 21.4C. hominis 15.4 21.4C. bovis 17.7 19.0C. baileyi 14.7 19.4C. muris 15.0 19.4C. andersoni 13.8 20.1
a Actin sequences were not available for these genotypes.
isolates: silver biddy GO18 and GO55), hereafter referredto as piscine genotype 8 at the 18S rRNA locus (Table 3).The two piscine genotype 8 isolates from silver biddieswere genetically identical to each other, but distinct fromall isolates previously characterised at the 18S rRNA locus(Table 4). Neighbour-joining, parsimony and maximumlikelihood analysis produced similar results and indicatedthat piscine 8 genotype clustered most closely with thepiscine 3 genotype from a sea mullet, while the other fiveisolates regularly clustered with C. parvum (85% bootstrapsupport) (Fig. 2). Sequences were also obtained for the twopiscine genotype 8 isolates at the actin locus. At this locus,sequence information was only available for C. molnariand piscine genotype 1 and piscine genotype 8 groupedmore closely with C. molnari genotypes (7.3–8.5% geneticdifferences) (Fig. 3 and Table 4).
At the gp60 locus, three subtypes belonging to C. parvum(family IIa: IIaA14G2R1, IIaA15G2R1, IIaA19G4R1) and aC. hominis subtype (family Id: IdA15G1) were identified(Table 3).
3.3. Microscopy
No parasites were observed during microscopic exam-ination of the intestinal or stomach tissues due tosubstantial autolysis of tissues.
3.4. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers
The unique partial 18S rRNA and actin sequences ofpiscine genotype 8 from silver biddies were deposited
Table 3Species, genotypes and subtypes of Cryptosporidium identified in fish in the present study. Sample DM18 was typed as C. parvum at the 18S locus but atgp60 locus it was typed as C. hominis (IdA15G1) indicating the presence of mixed C. parvum/C. hominis in this sample.
Sample Host species Group 18S gp60 Actin
ON36 Nile tilapia Cultured C. parvum IIaA19G4R1 –ON68 Nile tilapia Cultured C. parvum IIaA14G2R1 –PG37 Silver barb Wild freshwater C. parvum IIaA19G4R1 –DM17 Mackerel scad Wild marine C. parvum IIaA15G2R1 –DM18 Mackerel scad Wild marine C. parvum, IdA15G1 –GO18 Silver biddy Wild marine Piscine genotype 8 – Piscine genotype 8GO55 Silver biddy Wild marine Piscine genotype 8 – Piscine genotype 8
Appendix D Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
D-6
6 M. Koinari et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 198 (2013) 1– 9
Fig. 2. Evolutionary relationships of Cryptosporidium piscine-derived isolates inferred by neighbour-joining analysis of p distances calculated from pairwisecomparison of 18S rRNA sequences. The percentage of replicate trees in which associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates),are shown at the internal nodes (>50% only) for distance, ML and parsimony (n.s. = not supported). Accession numbers are given in parentheses. Isolatesfrom the present study are marked with asterisk (*).
Appendix D Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
D-7
M. Koinari et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 198 (2013) 1– 9 7
Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationships of Cryptosporidium isolates inferred by neighbour-joining analysis of the actin gene based on genetic distances calculatedby the p distance model. The percentage of replicate trees in which associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates), are shown atthe internal nodes (>50% only) for distance, ML and parsimony (n.s. = not supported). Accession numbers are given in parentheses. Isolates from the presentstudy are marked with asterisk (*).
in the GenBank database under the accession numbersKC807985–KC807988.
4. Discussion
In the present study, the overall prevalence of Cryp-tosporidium sp. was low (1.14%, 7/614). Previous studieshave also reported low prevalences in similar groups of fish(0.8%, 6/709) (Reid et al., 2010) and in ornamental fish (3.5%,6/171) (Morine et al., 2012) while others have reportedhigher prevalences (10–100%) mostly among juvenile fish(Alvarez-Pellitero et al., 2004; Sitja-Bobadilla et al., 2005;Murphy et al., 2009; Zanguee et al., 2010).
This study identified three new fish hosts for Cryp-tosporidium; silver barb (P. gonionotus), mackerel scad (D.maracellus) and oblong silver biddy (G. oblongus). Thefourth host Nile tilapia (O. niloticus) could also be a new hostsince previous studies have detected Cryptosporidium in thesame genus but did not identified the species (Landsbergand Paperna, 1986; Paperna and Vilenkin, 1996).
No oocysts or life cycle stages were observed in theinfected fish hosts in the present study due to substantialautolysis of tissues, which has been reported as an issue forCryptosporidium detection in piscine hosts (Zanguee et al.,2010). Fish are known to have a very rapid rate of tissueautolysis compared to homeotherms (Roberts, 2012) andmany of the fish were dead for up to 4 h prior to beingprocessed which contributed to the problem. Previousstudies have provided histological and electron micro-scopic evidence of considerable cellular damage associatedwith several Cryptosporidium species/genotypes that infectfish; C. molnari in the stomach of fingerlings and juveniles ofgilt-head sea bream (Alvarez-Pellitero and Sitja-Bobadilla,2002), piscine genotype 1 in the stomach of a guppy(Ryan et al., 2004) and piscine genotype 3 in the intes-tine of a mullet (Reid et al., 2010). Piscine genotype 2 wasassociated with gastric infections in angelfish, with thegreatest morbidity and mortality seen in larval and juve-nile fish (Murphy et al., 2009). Whether the C. parvumand C. hominis identified in the present study represents
Appendix D Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
D-8
8 M. Koinari et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 198 (2013) 1– 9
actual or mechanical infections remains to be determinedas the oocysts may have been passing through rather thaninfecting these fish and further research using histologicalanalysis of rapidly preserved tissue specimen is required toconfirm this.
The zoonotic Cryptosporidium genotypes identified inthis study are of significance to public health. Cryp-tosporidium parvum subtypes IIaA14G2R1, IIaA15G2R1and IIaA19G4R1 were found in cultured freshwater (Niletilapia), wild freshwater (silver barb) and a marine (mack-erel scad) fish. The zoonotic C. parvum IIa subtype familyhas predominantly been found in calves and in humans inNorth America, Europe and Australia (Xiao, 2010). Only onestudy has previously detected zoonotic C. parvum (subtypeIIaA18G3R1) in a marine fish (Reid et al., 2010). The pres-ence of IIa subtypes in the fish samples from the presentstudy could be due to waterborne contamination withhuman and animal waste. Human sewage managementsystems in PNG villages typically involve dugout toiletsnear the homes and toilets built over the rivers or seas. Nocattle farms were seen in close vicinity to where the sam-ples were collected, whereas dugout toilets, companionanimals and/or domesticated poultry and pigs were seen inthe environment. Fish ponds, rivers and seas could be con-taminated from rainwater runoff and from humans and/oranimals bathing in them. A previous study has detectedantibodies against Cryptosporidium among children fromPNG (Groves et al., 1994), however, no molecular work hasbeen done to confirm the species or genotypes present.
One marine fish (mackerel scad DM18) was identifiedas C. parvum at the 18S locus while at the gp60 locus itwas subtyped as C. hominis IdA15G1R1, indicating that amixed C. parvum/C. hominis infection was present. This isthe first report of C. hominis in fish. The only other marineorganism in which C. hominis has been reported was adugong (Dugong dugon) (Morgan et al., 2000), and its pres-ence probably reflects human sewage contamination of thewater.
The novel piscine genotype 8 was identified in twomarine silver biddies. At the 18S locus, piscine genotype 8exhibited 4.3% genetic difference with piscine genotype 3and 13.8–17.7% genetic difference with other Cryptosporid-ium spp. (Table 4). At the actin locus, piscine genotype8 exhibited 7.3% genetic difference with C. molnari 2and 19.0–21.4% with other Cryptosporidium spp. (Table 4).Based on the differences in the genetic sequences, piscinegenotype 8 is unique and may represent a new species;however, further research is required to confirm this.
The present study identified zoonotic C. parvum sub-types in fish species, which are frequently eaten in PNG.Previous studies have not identified conclusive evidencefor transmission of Cryptosporidium from fish to humansbut one study reported that urban anglers are at a riskfor contracting cryptosporidiosis from exposures receivedwhile fishing and consuming caught fish (mean probabil-ity of infection was nearly one) (Roberts et al., 2007). It istherefore essential that fish for human consumption arehandled appropriately to avoid contamination. In addition,a novel Cryptosporidium sp. (piscine genotype 8) was iden-tified based on molecular data but lacks histological detailsof infection or morphological features of the oocysts, thus
future work is required to establish this genotype as aspecies.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the staff of PNG’s National AgricultureResearch Institute (NARI), especially Dr. Workneh Ayalewfor logistical support and advice, Ms Atmaleo Aguyanto andMr Densley Tapat for assistance with sampling of culturedfish and staff at the PNG Department of Agriculture andLivestock for their assistance during sampling. We wouldlike to thank Dr. Andrea Paparini for helping with PCR at theactin locus and Dr. Rongchang Yang for helpful discussions.
References
Alvarez-Pellitero, P., Sitja-Bobadilla, A., 2002. Cryptosporidium molnarin. sp. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae) infecting two marine fishspecies, Sparus aurata L. and Dicentrarchus labrax L. Int. J. Parasitol.32, 1007–1021.
Alvarez-Pellitero, P., Quiroga, M.I., Sitja-Bobadilla, A., Redondo, M.J., Palen-zuela, O., Padros, F., Vazquez, S., Nieto, J.M., 2004. Cryptosporidiumscophthalmi n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae) from culturedturbot Scophthalmus maximus. Light and electron microscope descrip-tion and histopathological study. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 62, 133–145.
Alves, M., Xiao, L., Sulaiman, I., Lal, A.A., Matos, O., Antunes, F., 2003.Subgenotype analysis of Cryptosporidium isolates from humans, cattle,and zoo ruminants in Portugal. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41, 2744–2747.
Felsenstein, J., 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach usingthe bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783–791.
Groves, V.J., Lehmann, D., Gilbert, G.L., 1994. Seroepidemiology ofcryptosporidiosis in children in Papua New Guinea and Australia. Epi-demiol. Infect. 113, 491–499.
Hills, D., Bull, M.J.J., 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a methodfor assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42,182–192.
Koinari, M., Karl, S., Ryan, U., Lymbery, A.J., 2012. Infection levels of gas-trointestinal parasites in sheep and goats in Papua New Guinea. J.Helminthol., http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X12000594.
Koinari, M., Karl, S., Elliot, A., Ryan, U., Lymbery, A.J., 2013. Identificationof Anisakis species (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in marine fish hosts fromPapua New Guinea. Vet. Parasitol. 193, 126–133.
Landsberg, J.H., Paperna, I., 1986. Ultrastructural study of the coccidianCryptosporidium sp. from stomachs of juvenile cichlid fish. Dis. Aquat.Organ. 2, 13–20.
Morgan, U.M., Deplazes, P., Forbes, D.A., Spano, F., Hertzberg, H., Sargent,K.D., Elliot, A., Thompson, R.C., 1999. Sequence and PCR-RFLP analysisof the internal transcribed spacers of the rDNA repeat unit in isolatesof Cryptosporidium from different hosts. Parasitology 118, 49–58.
Morgan, U.M., Xiao, L., Hill, B.D., O’Donoghue, P., Limor, J., Lal, A., Thomp-son, R.C., 2000. Detection of the Cryptosporidium parvum “human”genotype in a dugong (Dugong dugon). J. Parasitol. 86, 1352–1354.
Morine, M., Yang, R., Ng, J., Kueh, S., Lymbery, A.J., Ryan, U.M., 2012.Additional novel Cryptosporidium genotypes in ornamental fishes. Vet.Parasitol. 190, 578–582.
Murphy, B.G., Bradway, D., Walsh, T., Sanders, G.E., Snekvik, K., 2009. Gas-tric cryptosporidiosis in freshwater angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare). J.Vet. Diagn. Invest. 21, 722–727.
Nei, M., Zhang, J., 2006. Evolutionary distance: estimation. EncyclopaediaLife Sci., 1–3, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npg.els.0005108.
Ng, J., Pavlasek, I., Ryan, U., 2006. Identification of novel Cryptosporidiumgenotypes from avian hosts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 7548–7553.
O’Donoghue, P.J., 1995. Cryptosporidium and cryptosporidiosis in man andanimals. Int. J. Parasitol. 25, 139–195.
Owen, I.L., 2005. Parasitic zoonoses in Papua New Guinea. J. Helminthol.79, 1–14.
Palenzuela, O., Alvarez-Pellitero, P., Sitja-Bobadilla, A., 2010. Molecularcharacterization of Cryptosporidium molnari reveals a distinct piscineclade. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 7646–7649.
Paperna, I., Vilenkin, M., 1996. Cryptosporiodiosis in the gourami Tri-chogaster leeri: description of a new species and proposal for a newgenus, Piscicrytosporidium, for species infection fish. Dis. Aquat. Organ.27, 95–101.
Appendix D Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
D-9
M. Koinari et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 198 (2013) 1– 9 9
Reid, A., Lymbery, A., Ng, J., Tweedle, S., Ryan, U., 2010. Identification ofnovel and zoonotic Cryptosporidium species in marine fish. Vet. Para-sitol. 168, 190–195.
Roberts, J.D., Silbergeld, E.K., Graczyk, T., 2007. A probabilistic risk assess-ment of Cryptosporidium exposure among Baltimore urban anglers. J.Toxicol. Environ. Health A 70, 1568–1576.
Roberts, R.J., 2012. Fish Pathology. Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. p440.Rozsa, L., Reiczigel, J., Majoros, G., 2000. Quantifying parasites in samples
of hosts. J. Parasitol. 86, 228–232.Ryan, U., O’Hara, A., Xiao, L., 2004. Molecular and biological characteriza-
tion of a Cryptosporidium molnari-like isolate from a guppy (Poeciliareticulata). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 3761–3765.
Ryan, U., 2010. Cryptosporidium in birds, fish and amphibians. Exp. Para-sitol. 124, 113–120.
Sitja-Bobadilla, A., Padros, F., Aguilera, C., Alvarez-Pellitero, P., 2005. Epi-demiology of Cryptosporidium molnari in Spanish gilthead sea bream(Sparus aurata L.) and European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.) cul-tures: from hatchery to market size. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71,131–139.
Smith, P.T. (Ed.), 2007. Aquaculture in Papua New Guinea: status offreshwater fish farming. ACIAR Monograph No. 125. ACIAR, Canberra,
Australia, July 2010. ISBN: 1 86320 522 5 (print); ISBN 1 86320 523 3(online).
Sulaiman, I.M., Hira, P.R., Zhou, L., Al-Ali, F.M., Al-Shelahi, F.A., Shweiki,H.M., Iqbal, J., Khalid, N., Xiao, L., 2005. Unique endemicity ofcryptosporidiosis in children in Kuwait. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43,2805–2809.
Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M., Kumar, S., 2011.MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximumlikelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2731–2739.
Xiao, L., 2010. Molecular epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis: an update.Exp. Parasitol. 124, 80–89.
Yang, R., Murphy, C., Song, Y., Ng-Hublin, J., Estcourt, A., Hijjawi, N.,Chalmers, R., Hadfield, S., Bath, A., Gordon, C., Ryan, U., 2013. Spe-cific and quantitative detection and identification of Cryptosporidiumhominis and C. parvum in clinical and environmental samples. Exp.Parasitol. 135, 142–147.
Zanguee, N., Lymbery, J.A., Lau, J., Suzuki, A., Yang, R., Ng, J., Ryan, U., 2010.Identification of novel Cryptosporidium species in aquarium fish. Vet.Parasitol. 174, 43–48.
Appendix D Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
D-10
Appendix E Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
E-1
Appendix E Identification of Anisakis species (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in marine
fish hosts from Papua New Guinea
Veterinary Parasitology 193 (2013) 126– 133
Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect
Veterinary Parasitology
jou rn al h om epa ge: www.elsev ier .com/ locate /vetpar
Identification of Anisakis species (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in marinefish hosts from Papua New Guinea
M. Koinari a,∗, S. Karlb, A. Elliota, U. Ryana, A.J. Lymberyc
a School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australiab School of Medicine and Pharmacology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australiac Fish Health Unit, School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:Received 18 October 2012Received in revised form 5 December 2012Accepted 10 December 2012
Keywords:Anisakid nematodesAnisakis typicaMarine fishITSMt-DNA cox2ZoonoticPapua New Guinea
a b s t r a c t
The third-stage larvae of several genera of anisakid nematodes are important etiologicalagents for zoonotic human anisakiasis. The present study investigated the prevalence ofpotentially zoonotic anisakid larvae in fish collected on the coastal shelves off Madangand Rabaul in Papua New Guinea (PNG) where fish represents a major component of thediet. Nematodes were found in seven fish species including Decapterus macarellus, Gerresoblongus, Pinjalo lewisi, Pinjalo pinjalo, Selar crumenophthalmus, Scomberomorus maculatusand Thunnus albacares. They were identified by both light and scanning electron microscopyas Anisakis Type I larvae. Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of the ribosomal inter-nal transcribed spacer (ITS) and the mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase subunit II (cox2)gene identified all nematodes as Anisakis typica. This study represents the first in-depthcharacterisation of Anisakis larvae from seven new fish hosts in PNG. The overall preva-lence of larvae was low (7.6%) and no recognised zoonotic Anisakis species were identified,suggesting a very low threat of anisakiasis in PNG.
© 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The family Anisakidae includes parasitic nematodes ofmarine fauna. They have a worldwide distribution anda complex life-cycle which involves invertebrates, fish,cephalopods and mammals (Chai et al., 2005). Anisakidnematodes can accidentally infect humans who can sufferfrom several symptoms including sudden epigastric pain,nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and allergic reaction (Sakanariand McKerrow, 1989; Audicana and Kennedy, 2008). Mostcases of human infection involve anisakid species belong-ing to the genus Anisakis Dujardin, 1845. There are nine
∗ Corresponding author at: School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sci-ences, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, Western Australia6150, Australia. Tel.: +61 89360 6379; fax: +61 89310 414.
E-mail addresses: M.Koinari@murdoch.edu.au, mkoinari@gmail.com(M. Koinari).
described species of Anisakis, which are further subdividedinto two types. Type I consists of Anisakis simplex sensustricto (s.s), A. pegreffii, A. simplex C, A. typica, A. ziphidarumand A. nascettii while Type II consists of A. paggiae, A. phy-seteris and A. brevispiculata (Mattiucci and Nascetti, 2008;Mattiucci et al., 2009). Of these, only A. simplex s.s, A. pegr-effii and A. physeteris have been shown to cause infection inhumans (Mattiucci et al., 2011; Arizono et al., 2012).
Anisakid nematodes can be differentiated based ontheir morphological characteristics and molecular data.According to Berland (1961), larval morphological featuresincluding the absence of a ventricular appendage and anintestinal caecum are useful for distinction between sev-eral anisakid genera. Anisakis Type I or Type II larvae can beidentified based on ventriculus length and the presence of atail spine (or mucron) (Berland, 1961). More recently, poly-merase chain reaction (PCR) based tools have been widelyused for characterisation of anisakid species at multipleloci, including ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS)
0304-4017/$ – see front matter © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.12.008
Appendix E Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
E-2
M. Koinari et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 193 (2013) 126– 133 127
Fig. 1. Map of the study sites. Samples were collected on the coastalshelves off Madang and Rabaul in Papua New Guinea.
regions (Zhu et al., 1998; D’Amelio et al., 2000; Nadler et al.,2005; Pontes et al., 2005; Abe et al., 2006; Umehara et al.,2006, 2008; Zhu et al., 2007; Kijewska et al., 2009) andthe mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase subunit II (cox2)gene (Valentini et al., 2006; Mattiucci et al., 2009; Murphyet al., 2010; Cavallero et al., 2011; D’Amelio et al., 2011;Setyobudi et al., 2011).
Anisakid nematodes are a major public health con-cern. In the last thirty years, there has been a markedincrease in the prevalence of anisakiasis throughout theworld, due in part to growing consumption of raw or lightlycooked seafood (Lymbery and Cheah, 2007; Audicana andKennedy, 2008). Over 90% of cases of anisakiasis are fromJapan where consumption of raw fish is popular, with mostof the rest from other countries with a tradition of eat-ing raw or marinated fish, such as the Netherlands, France,Spain, Chile and the Philippines (Chai et al., 2005; Choi et al.,2009).
Fish are one of the most important food sources in thecoastal areas of Papua New Guinea (PNG). A wide varietyof fish species are caught and sold at local markets. Littleis known about the prevalence of zoonotic animal para-sites including anisakids in fish or of anisakiasis in humansin PNG (Koinari et al., 2012). A review paper mentionedA. simplex in skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) in waterson the south coast of PNG, but did not provide any sup-porting information (Owen, 2005). The present study wasaimed at investigating the distribution of anisakid speciesin the archipelago off the New Guinean northern coast andspecifically to screen for zoonotic species in fish using bothmorphology and PCR analysis of the ITS region and themitochondrial cox2 gene.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Parasite collection
A total of 276 whole fresh fish were collected frommarkets in the coastal towns of Madang and Rabaul fromMarch to August 2011 (Fig. 1). The fish were necropsied andnematodes were collected from the body cavities. The mus-cles of the fish were thinly sliced and investigated under
white light to check for nematode larvae. Nematodes werepreserved in 70% ethanol and transported to Murdoch Uni-versity, Australia, for analysis. The prevalence of anisakidsin each fish host was expressed as the percentage of pos-itive samples; with 95% confidence intervals calculatedassuming a binomial distribution (Rozsa et al., 2000).
2.2. Morphological analysis
Whole nematodes were cleared in lactophenol formore than 48 h and individually mounted onto microscopeslides. The body lengths of the nematodes were directlymeasured. Images were taken with an Olympus BX50light microscope equipped with Olympus DP70 Camera at40/100× magnification. The following features were mea-sured: body width, oesophagus length, ventriculus lengthand mucron length. Morphological identification was con-ducted according to keys previously reported (Berland,1961; Cannon, 1977; Shamsi et al.,2009a,b).
Scanning electron micrographs (SEMs) were taken forrepresentative specimens to study further morphologicaldetails. SEMs were obtained on a Phillips XL30 scanningelectron microscope at the Centre for Microscopy Char-acterisation and Analysis at the University of WesternAustralia. Parasite samples were fixed in 2% glutaralde-hyde and 1% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 60 min at 4 ◦Cand washed twice with PBS (pH = 7.4) in 1.5 mL eppendorftubes. Samples were dehydrated using a PELCO Biowavemicrowave processor (TedPella Inc., Redding, CA, USA)by passage through increasing ethanol concentrations inwater (33%, 50%, 66% and 100%) followed by two washesin dry acetone. Samples were then dried in a critical pointdryer (Emitech 850, Quorum Technologies, Ashford, UK),attached to aluminium sample holders and coated witha 5 nm thick platinum coating to enable surface electricalconduction.
2.3. Genetic characterisation and phylogenetic analysis
DNA from individual nematodes was isolated usinga DNeasy® Tissue Kit (Cat. No. 69504, Qiagen, Hilden,Germany). The ITS rDNA region was amplified usingprimers NC5 5′-GTAGGTGAACCTGCGGAAGGATCAT-3′
and NC2 5′-TTAGTTTCTTTTCCCTCCGCT-3′ (Zhu et al.,1998) and the mt-DNA cox2 gene was amplified usingprimers 210 5′-CACCAACTCTTAAAATTATC-3′ and 2115′-TTTTCTAGTTATATAGATTGRTTYAT-3′ (Nadler andHudspeth, 2000).
Each PCR was performed in a reaction volume of 25 �Lusing 1 �L of DNA, 1× PCR buffer (Kapa Biosystems, CapeTown, South Africa), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 �M (each) dNTP(Fisher Biotech, Australia), 12.5 pmol of each primer and0.5 U of kapa Taq DNA polymerase (Kapa Biosystems, CapeTown, South Africa). Negative (no DNA template) and pos-itive (genomic DNA from L3 Anisakis typica larvae) controlswere included in all PCRs. Thermal cycling was performedin a Perkin Elmer Gene Amp PCR 2400 thermal cycler atconditions as previously described (Valentini et al., 2006;Kijewska et al., 2009).
All amplicons were purified using an Ultra Clean®
DNA purification kit (MolBio, West Carlsbad, CA, USA).
Appendix E Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
E-3
128 M. Koinari et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 193 (2013) 126– 133
Table 1Fish species from which anisakid larvae were collected in the present study.
Fish species N Prevalence (CI) MI ± SD (min–max) Specimen code
Decapterus macarellus (Mackerel Scad) 29 6.9 (−0.03 to 0.17) 1 DM23, DM24Gerres oblongus (Slender Silver-biddy) 54 3.7 (−0.02 to 0.09) 3 ± 0.4 (2–4) GO14, GO15Pinjalo lewisi (White-spot Pinjalo Snapper) 14 50 (0.2–0.8) 5 ± 0.92 (1–6) PL1, PL5, PL8, PL9Pinjalo pinjalo (Pinjalo) 1 100 (0.2–0.8) 120 PP1Scomberomous maculatus (Spanish Mackerel) 3 33.3 (−1.1 to 1.8) 1 SM3Thunnus albacares (Yellowfin Tuna) 34 2.9 (−0.3 to 0.09) 3 TA3Selar crumenophthalmus (Bigeye Scad) 106 6.6 (0.02–0.11) 2.9 ± 0.95 (1–3) SC76, SC77, SC78, SC88, SC97, SC100, SC102
N is the number of fish sampled, prevalence is the % of infected fish (95% CI in parentheses) and mean intensity (MI) is the mean number of larvae in theinfected fish hosts ± SD (range). Where no SD value was given, there was only one observation or all observations were similar so that SD could not becalculated.
Sequencing was performed using the ABI Prism BigDye®
terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems,Foster City, CA, USA) on an Applied Biosystems 3730DNA Analyser instrument according to manufacturer’sinstructions except that the annealing temperature waslowered to 46 ◦C for the cox2 locus. Sequences were ana-lysed using FinchTV 1.4.0 (Geospiza, Inc.; Seattle, WA,USA; http://www.geospiza.com) and compared with pub-lished sequences for identification using the NationalInstitute of Health’s National Centre for Biotechnol-ogy Information Basic Local Alignment Search Tool(http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Additional known ITS andcox2 nucleotide sequences were obtained from GenBank(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank) for phylogeneticanalysis.
MEGA5 (http://www.megasoftware.net/) was used forall phylogenetic analyses (Tamura et al., 2011). Thenucleotide sequences were aligned using MUSCLE (Edgar,2004), edited manually and tested with MEGA5 modeltest to find the best DNA model to infer the phylo-genetic trees. Phylogenetic analysis with other knownanisakid species was conducted using both neighbour-joining (NJ) and maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis forboth loci. Evolutionary relationships were calculated usingthe Kimura two-parameter model for ITS sequences andthe Tamura–Nei model for cox2 sequences with Contra-caecum osculatum as an outgroup. Reliabilities for both NJand ML trees were tested using 1000 bootstrap replica-tions (Felsenstein, 1985) and bootstrap values exceeding 70were considered well supported (Hills and Bull, 1993). Thenucleotide sequences were deposited in GenBank underthe accession numbers: JX648312–JX648326.
3. Results
3.1. Anisakid prevalence
The overall prevalence of anisakids in fish from PNGwas 7.6% (21/276, 95% CI = 0.05–0.11). Anisakid larvae werefound in 7 fish species, at prevalences ranging from 2.9% to100% (Table 1). The larvae were observed mostly within thebody cavities of the fish and their intensity ranged from 1 to6 per infected fish host with the exception of Pinjalo pinjalo,which had an intensity of 120 larvae per fish, with larvaebeing found in many other body parts including muscles,pyloric region and liver.
3.2. Morphology of Anisakis Type I larvae
Morphological analysis showed that all anisakid nema-todes examined were Anisakis Type I larvae. The larvaewere white and cylindrical in shape. They measuredbetween 20–36 mm in length and 0.4–0.45 mm in width.SEM revealed that the cuticles were irregularly striatedtransversely at 5.5 �m intervals. The larvae had incon-spicuous lips with six papillae, a prominent boring toothand excretory pore which opened ventrally at the cephalicend (Fig. 2, panels A and E). The mouth opening ledto a cylindrical striated oesophagus (length 1.6–2.1 mm),which was followed by a slightly wider ventriculus (length0.98–1.13 mm). The junction between oesophagus andventriculus was transverse (Fig. 2, panel B). The ventriculusconnected obliquely with the intestine, without a ventric-ular appendage and intestinal caecum (Fig. 2, panel C). Theintestine filled the remaining part of the body. The mucronwas distinct and was located at the caudal end (length17.5–18.0 �m) (Fig. 2, panels D, F and G).
3.3. Sequence and phylogenetic analysis of the ITS region
Amplification of the ITS rDNA generated an approx-imately 900 bp product. Both neighbour-joining andmaximum-likelihood analyses produced trees with similartopology. Neighbour-joining analysis of the ITS nucleotidesequences from the present study with previously reportedsequences from GenBank clustered all the Anisakis TypeI larvae examined with Anisakis typica (Fig. 3). The ITSnucleotide sequences of all the Anisakis Type I larvae fromthe present study exhibited 99.1–100% similarities to thepublished sequence of Anisakis typica (AB432909) foundin Indian mackerel (Rastrelliger kanagurta) in Thailandand 96.1–97.6% similarities to the published sequence ofAnisakis typica (JQ798962) found in cutlassfish (Trichiu-rus lepturus) from Brazil. The sequences exhibited 82.7% to88.7% similarities with other Anisakis species (Table 2).
Amplification of the cox2 gene generated an approxi-mately 629 bp product. As with the ITS locus, neighbour-joining and maximum-likelihood analyses produced treeswith similar topology. Neighbour-joining analysis of cox2nucleotide sequences showed that all isolates clusteredbroadly with A. typica (DQ116427) but revealed morevariation. Two broad groups were produced with sub-group I consisting of 5 isolates and A. typica reference
Appendix E Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
E-4
M. Koinari et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 193 (2013) 126– 133 129
Fig. 2. Anisakis Type I larvae from S. crumenophthalmus. These images are exemplary for all larvae found in the present study. Light microscopy imagesshow: (A) cephalic end of larva showing the boring tooth and the excretory pore; (B) ventriculus – oesophagus junction; (C) ventriculus – intestine junction;(D) claudal end showing the mucron, anal opening and anal glands. Scanning electron microscopy images show: (E) cephalic end; (F) rounded tail with amucron; (G) mucron. ag, anal glands; ao, anal opening; bt, boring tooth; e, oesophagus; ep, excretory pore; int, intestine; l, lips; mu, mucron; ve, ventriculus.
sequence (DQ116427), and subgroup II containing 16isolates (Fig. 4). Based on genetic distance analysis, sub-group I had 98.9–99.3% similarity to A. typica (DQ116427)while subgroup II had 92.4–94.6% similarity to A. typ-ica (DQ116427). The cox2 nucleotide sequences from thepresent study shared 77.0–87.2% similarity with otherknown Anisakis species (Table 2).
4. Discussion
Anisakid larvae were found in 7.6% (21/276) of the 7 fishspecies examined. The intensity of infection was low (1–6)
Table 2Percentage similarity of the Anisakis species analysed in the present studyand their closest relatives.
Species compared % similarity at
ITS rRNA locus Cox2 locus
A. typica 96.1–100 92.4–99.3A. ziphidarum 87.5–88.7 82.1–84.3A. pegreffii 85.4–86.2 84.7–87.2A. simplex s.s 85.6–86.3 84.7–86.7A. simplex C 85.8–86.6 84.2–85.8Anisakis sp.* 86.5–87.8 Not analysedA. nascettii Not analysed 83.9–86.7A. physeteris 82.7–83.9 82.8–84.5A. brevispiculata 78.6–80.1 77.0–79.1A. paggiae 83.8–84.7 79.3–82.2
At the ITS locus, comparison with A. typica, accession numbers AB432909and JQ798962 were presented. Anisakis sp.* is conspecific with A. nascettii(Mattiucci et al., 2009).
in all fish hosts except for Pinjalo pinjalo (120) (Table 1).Previous studies have reported wide variation in preva-lence and intensity of infection of anisakids in other fishhosts (Costa et al., 2003; Farjallah et al., 2008a,b; Setyobudiet al., 2011). The relatively low infection level found inthe present study could be due to the fact that most ofthe fish hosts sampled were relatively small in size (range16–49 cm fork length) compared to previous studies. Ingeneral, prevalence and parasite burden tends to increasewith the size and the age of the fish host (Setyobudi et al.,2011).
All nematodes in the present study were identified mor-phologically as Anisakis Type I larvae, based on an obliqueconnection between the ventriculus and the intestine, lackof a ventricular appendage and intestinal caecum, and thepresence of a mucron (Berland, 1961; Cannon, 1977). Lar-vae of A. typica found in cutlassfish (Trichiurus lepturus)from Brazil shared similar morphological characteristicswith the A. typica larvae from the present study (Borgeset al., 2012).
Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences indicatedthat all examined samples were Anisakis typica. At theITS locus, all isolates examined formed a single cladewith A. typica. The comparison of the ITS nucleotidesequences from this study with sequences previouslydeposited in Genbank resulted in 96.1–97.6% similar-ities to A. typica found in cutlassfish (accession no.JQ798962) from Brazil and 99.1–100% similarities to A.typica (accession no. AB432909) from Indian mackerel inThailand.
Appendix E Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
E-5
130 M. Koinari et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 193 (2013) 126– 133
Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationships between Anisakis species from the present study (*) and other Anisakis species as inferred by neighbour-joining analysisof ITS rDNA. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Kimura-2 parameter method and the rate variation among sites was modelled with agamma distribution with Contracaecum osculatum as an outgroup. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in thebootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown at the internal nodes (>50% only). Specimen codes are given in Table 1.
At the cox2 locus, whilst the isolates clustered broadlywith the reference A. typica genotype, two distinctsubgroups (I: 98.9–99.3% similarity and II: 92.4–94.6% sim-ilarity) were identified. Previously reported cox2 trees byValentini et al. (2006) also showed similar genetic diver-gence within the Anisakis typica clade. Furthermore, thesequence difference of 5.4–7.6% between the subgroup IIclade and the reference A. typica sequence is still withinthe range found between conspecifics in other nematodetaxa (Blouin et al., 1998).
According to Mattiucci and Nascetti (2006), Anisakisspecies form two sister clades and A. typica is groupedwithin clade I, based on phylogenetic relationships inferredfrom allozyme and mitochondrial gene markers. In the
present study, A. typica clustered within clade I at thecox2 locus, consistent with previously reported phyloge-netic trees (Valentini et al., 2006; Mattiucci et al., 2009;Cavallero et al., 2011; Setyobudi et al., 2011). However, atthe ITS locus, A. typica did not cluster within clade 1 andformed a separate group to the two clades. Other stud-ies have shown similar tree topologies at the ITS locus(Kijewska et al., 2009; Cavallero et al., 2011) and accord-ing to Cavallero et al. (2011), A. typica could form a distinctlineage (resulting in three clades, rather than two, for thegenus Anisakis). It should be noted, however, that the posi-tion of A. typica in both the ITS tree and cox2 tree was notwell supported (<50% bootstrap support) in our study andtherefore more sampling of the species from a wider range
Appendix E Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
E-6
M. Koinari et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 193 (2013) 126– 133 131
Fig. 4. Phylogenetic relationships between Anisakis species from the present study (*) and other Anisakis species inferred using the neighbour-joininganalysis of cox2 genes. The evolutionary distances were computed using Tamura–Nei model and the rate variation among sites was modelled with agamma distribution with Contracaecum osculatum as an outgroup. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in a bootstraptest (1000 replicates) are shown next to the branches (>50% only). Specimen codes are given in Table 1.
of hosts and geographical areas is needed to resolve thisdiscrepancy.
The present study identified seven new fish species ashosts for A. typica; Decapterus macarellus, Gerres oblongus,Pinjalo lewisi, Pinjalo pinjalo, Selar crumenophthalmus,Scomberomous maculatus and Thunnus albacares. Previousstudies have identified A. typica in more than 15 dif-ferent fish hosts, which have an epipelagic distributionin the Atlantic Ocean close to the coast lines of Brazil,Mauritius, Morocco, Portugal and Madeira (Mattiucci et al.,2002; Pontes et al., 2005; Marques et al., 2006; Farjallahet al., 2008a; Iniguez et al., 2009; Kijewska et al., 2009;Borges et al., 2012). Anisakis typica has also been foundin the Mediterranean Sea close to Tunisia, Libya, Cyprusand Crete, and in the Indian ocean off Somalia (Mattiucciet al., 2002; Farjallah et al., 2008b) and Australia (Yann,2006). Furthermore A. typica has been found in Japan,Taiwan, China, Thailand and Indonesia (Chen et al., 2008;
Palm et al., 2008; Umehara et al., 2010). Although ithas been hypothesised that A. typica has a global dis-tribution that extends from a 30◦S to a 35◦N latitude(Mattiucci and Nascetti, 2006), a previous distributionmodel for anisakid species has not included PNG (Kuhnet al., 2011).
In conclusion, all anisakids identified from PNG in thepresent study were A. typica, which has not previouslybeen associated with human infections. Further studies areneeded to extend the knowledge of anisakid species dis-tribution in larger fish hosts and other seafood hosts inPNG waters, but the present study results suggest that thedanger from zoonotic anisakid species in PNG is very low.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Dr. Rongchang Yang and JosephineNg for helpful discussions.
Appendix E Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
E-7
132 M. Koinari et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 193 (2013) 126– 133
This research received no specific grant from any fund-ing agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. This studywas approved by the Murdoch University Animal EthicsCommittee (Permit R2368/10).
References
Abe, N., Tominaga, K., Kimata, I., 2006. Usefulness of PCR-restriction frag-ment length polymorphism analysis of the internal transcribed spacerregion of rDNA for identification of Anisakis simplex complex. Jpn. J.Infect. Dis. 59, 60–62.
Arizono, N., Yamada, M., Tegoshi, T., Yoshikawa, M., 2012. Anisakis sim-plex sensu stricto and Anisakis pegreffii: biological characteristics andpathogenetic potential in human anisakiasis. Foodborne Pathog. Dis.9, 517–521.
Audicana, M.T., Kennedy, M.W., 2008. Anisakis simplex: from obscure infec-tious worm to inducer of immune hypersensitivity. Clin. Microbiol.Rev. 21, 360–379.
Berland, B., 1961. Nematodes from some Norwegian marine fishes. Sarsia2, 1–50.
Blouin, M.S., Yowell, C.A., Courtney, C.H., Dame, J.B., 1998. Substitutionbias, rapid saturation, and the use of mtDNA for nematode systemat-ics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 1719–1727.
Borges, J.N., Cunha, L.F., Santos, H.L., Monteiro-Neto, C., Portes Santos,C., 2012. Morphological and molecular diagnosis of anisakid nema-tode larvae from cutlassfish (Trichiurus lepturus) off the coast of Riode Janeiro, Brazil. PLoS ONE 7, e40447.
Cannon, L.R., 1977. Some larval ascaridoids from south-eastern Queens-land marine fishes. Int. J. Parasitol. 7, 233–243.
Cavallero, S., Nadler, S.A., Paggi, L., Barros, N.B., D’Amelio, S., 2011. Molec-ular characterization and phylogeny of anisakid nematodes fromcetaceans from southeastern Atlantic coasts of USA, Gulf of Mexico,and Caribbean Sea. Parasitol. Res. 108, 781–792.
Chai, J.Y., Darwin Murrell, K., Lymbery, A.J., 2005. Fish-borne parasiticzoonoses: status and issues. Int. J. Parasitol. 35, 1233–1254.
Chen, Q., Yu, H.Q., Lun, Z.R., Chen, X.G., Song, H.Q., Lin, R.Q., Zhu, X.Q.,2008. Specific PCR assays for the identification of common anisakidnematodes with zoonotic potential. Parasitol. Res. 104, 79–84.
Choi, S.J., Lee, J.C., Kim, M.J., Hur, G.Y., Shin, S.Y., Park, H.S., 2009. The clinicalcharacteristics of Anisakis allergy in Korea. Korean J. Intern. Med. 24,160–163.
Costa, G., Pontes, T., Mattiucci, S., D’Amelio, S., 2003. The occurrenceand infection dynamics of Anisakis larvae in the black-scabbard fish,Aphanopus carbo, chub mackerel, Scomber japonicus, and oceanic horsemackerel, Trachurus picturatus from Madeira, Portugal. J. Helminthol.77, 163–166.
D’Amelio, S., Mathiopoulos, K.D., Santos, C.P., Pugachev, O.N., Webb,S.C., Picanco, M., Paggi, L., 2000. Genetic markers in ribosomal DNAfor the identification of members of the genus Anisakis (Nematoda:ascaridoidea) defined by polymerase-chain-reaction-based restric-tion fragment length polymorphism. Int. J. Parasitol. 30, 223–226.
D’Amelio, S., Cavallero, S., Dronen, N.O., Barros, N.B., Paggi, L., 2011.Two new species of Contracaecum Railliet & Henry, 1912 (Nematoda:Anisakidae), C. fagerholmi n. sp. and C. rudolphii F from the brownpelican Pelecanus occidentalis in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Syst.Parasitol. 81, 1–16.
Edgar, R.C., 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accu-racy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797.
Farjallah, S., Busi, M., Mahjoub, M.O., Slimane, B.B., Paggi, L., Said, K.,D’Amelio, S., 2008a. Molecular characterization of larval anisakidnematodes from marine fishes off the Moroccan and Mauritaniancoasts. Parasitol. Int. 57, 430–436.
Farjallah, S., Slimane, B.B., Busi, M., Paggi, L., Amor, N., Blel, H., Said,K., D’Amelio, S., 2008b. Occurrence and molecular identification ofAnisakis spp. from the North African coasts of Mediterranean Sea.Parasitol. Res. 102, 371–379.
Felsenstein, J., 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach usingthe bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783–791.
Hills, D., Bull, M.J.J., 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a methodfor assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42,182–192.
Iniguez, A.M., Santos, C.P., Vicente, A.C., 2009. Genetic characterization ofAnisakis typica and Anisakis physeteris from marine mammals and fishfrom the Atlantic Ocean off Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. 165, 350–356.
Kijewska, A., Dzido, J., Shukhgalter, O., Rokicki, J., 2009. Anisakid parasitesof fishes caught on the African shelf. J. Parasitol. 95, 639–645.
Koinari, M., Karl, S., Ryan, U., Lymbery, A.J., 2012. Infection levels ofgastrointestinal parasites in sheep and goats in Papua New Guinea.J. Helminthol., http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X12000594 (pub-lished online ahead of print 11.10.12).
Kuhn, T., Garcia-Marquez, J., Klimpel, S., 2011. Adaptive radiation withinmarine anisakid nematodes: a zoogeographical modeling of cos-mopolitan, zoonotic parasites. PloS ONE 6, e28642.
Lymbery, A.J., Cheah, F.Y., 2007. Anisakid nematode and anisakiasis. In:Murrell, K.D., Fried, B. (Eds.), Food-Borne Parasitic Zoonoses: Fish andPlant-Borne Parasites. Springer, New York, pp. 185–207.
Marques, J.F., Cabral, H.N., Busi, M., D’Amelio, S., 2006. Molecular identifi-cation of Anisakis species from Pleuronectiformes off the Portuguesecoast. J. Helminthol. 80, 47–51.
Mattiucci, S., Paggi, L., Nascetti, G., Portes Santos, C., Costa, G., Di Beneditto,A.P., Ramos, R., Argyrou, M., Cianchi, R., Bullini, L., 2002. Genetic mark-ers in the study of Anisakis typica (Diesing, 1860): larval identificationand genetic relationships with other species of Anisakis Dujardin, 1845(Nematoda: Anisakidae). Syst. Parasitol. 51, 159–170.
Mattiucci, S., Nascetti, G., 2006. Molecular systematics, phylogeny andecology of anisakid nematodes of the genus Anisakis Dujardin 1845:an update. Parasite (Paris, France) 13, 99–113.
Mattiucci, S., Nascetti, G., 2008. Advances and trends in the molecularsystematics of anisakid nematodes, with implications for their evo-lutionary ecology and host-parasite co-evolutionary processes. Adv.Parasitol. 66, 47–148.
Mattiucci, S., Paoletti, M., Webb, S.C., 2009. Anisakis nascettii n. sp. (Nema-toda: Anisakidae) from beaked whales of the southern hemisphere:morphological description, genetic relationships between congenersand ecological data. Syst. Parasitol. 74, 199–217.
Mattiucci, S., Paoletti, M., Borrini, F., Palumbo, M., Palmieri, R.M., Gomes,V., Casati, A., Nascetti, G., 2011. First molecular identification ofthe zoonotic parasite Anisakis pegreffii (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in aparaffin-embedded granuloma taken from a case of human intestinalanisakiasis in Italy. BMC Inf. Dis. 11, 82.
Murphy, T.M., Berzano, M., O’Keeffe, S.M., Cotter, D.M., McEvoy, S.E.,Thomas, K.A., Maoileidigh, N.P., Whelan, K.F., 2010. Anisakid larvaein Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) grilse and post-smolts: molecularidentification and histopathology. J. Parasitol. 96, 77–82.
Nadler, S.A., Hudspeth, D.S., 2000. Phylogeny of the Ascaridoidea (Nema-toda: Ascaridida) based on three genes and morphology: hypothesesof structural and sequence evolution. J. Parasitol. 86, 380–393.
Nadler, S.A., D’Amelio, S., Dailey, M.D., Paggi, L., Siu, S., Sakanari, J.A., 2005.Molecular phylogenetics and diagnosis of Anisakis, Pseudoterranova,and Contracaecum from northern Pacific marine mammals. J. Parasitol.91, 1413–1429.
Owen, I.L., 2005. Parasitic zoonoses in Papua New Guinea. J. Helminthol.79, 1–14.
Palm, H.W., Damriyasa, I.M., Oka, L., Oka, I.B.M., 2008. Molecular genotyp-ing of Anisakis Dujardin, 1845 (Nematoda: Ascaridoidea: Anisakidae)larvae from marine fish of Balinese and Javanese waters, Indonesia.Helminthologia 45, 3–12.
Pontes, T., D’Amelio, S., Costa, G., Paggi, L., 2005. Molecular characteriza-tion of larval anisakid nematodes from marine fishes of Madeira by aPCR-based approach, with evidence for a new species. J. Parasitol. 91,1430–1434.
Rozsa, L., Reiczigel, J., Majoros, G., 2000. Quantifying parasites in samplesof hosts. J. Parasitol. 86, 228–232.
Sakanari, J.A., McKerrow, J.H., 1989. Anisakiasis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2,278–284.
Setyobudi, E., Jeon, C.H., Lee, C.H., Seong, K.B., Kim, J.H., 2011. Occurrenceand identification of Anisakis spp. (Nematoda: Anisakidae) isolatedfrom chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) in Korea. Parasitol. Res. 108,585–592.
Shamsi, S., Norman, R., Gasser, R., Beveridge, I., 2009a. Genetic andmorphological evidences for the existence of sibling species withinContracaecum rudolphii (Hartwich, 1964) (Nematoda: Anisakidae) inAustralia. Parasitol. Res. 105, 529–538.
Shamsi, S., Norman, R., Gasser, R., Beveridge, I., 2009b. Redescriptionand genetic characterization of selected Contracaecum spp. (Nema-toda: Anisakidae) from various hosts in Australia. Parasitol. Res. 104,1507–1525.
Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M., Kumar, S., 2011.MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximumlikelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2731–2739.
Umehara, A., Kawakami, Y., Matsui, T., Araki, J., Uchida, A., 2006. Molecularidentification of Anisakis simplex sensu stricto and Anisakis pegreffii(Nematoda: Anisakidae) from fish and cetacean in Japanese waters.Parasitol. Int. 55, 267–271.
Appendix E Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
E-8
M. Koinari et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 193 (2013) 126– 133 133
Umehara, A., Kawakami, Y., Araki, J., Uchida, A., 2008. Multiplex PCR forthe identification of Anisakis simplex sensu stricto, Anisakis pegreffiiand the other anisakid nematodes. Parasitol. Int. 57, 49–53.
Umehara, A., Kawakami, Y., Ooi, H.K., Uchida, A., Ohmae, H., Sugiyama, H.,2010. Molecular identification of Anisakis Type I larvae isolated fromhairtail fish off the coasts of Taiwan and Japan. Int. J. Food Microbiol.143, 161–165.
Valentini, A., Mattiucci, S., Bondanelli, P., Webb, S.C., Mignucci-Giannone,A.A., Colom-Llavina, M.M., Nascetti, G., 2006. Genetic relationshipsamong Anisakis species (Nematoda: Anisakidae) inferred from mito-chondrial cox2 sequences, and comparison with allozyme data. J.Parasitol. 92, 156–166.
Yann, C.F., 2006. Molecular and biological characterisation of anisakids inWestern Australia, B. Sc. Honours thesis, Murdoch University, Mur-doch, Australia.
Zhu, X., Gasser, R.B., Podolska, M., Chilton, N.B., 1998. Characterisationof anisakid nematodes with zoonotic potential by nuclear ribosomalDNA sequences. Int. J. Parasitol. 28, 1911–1921.
Zhu, X.Q., Podolska, M., Liu, J.S., Yu, H.Q., Chen, H.H., Lin, Z.X., Luo, C.B.,Song, H.Q., Lin, R.Q., 2007. Identification of anisakid nematodes withzoonotic potential from Europe and China by single-strand conforma-tion polymorphism analysis of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Parasitol. Res.101, 1703–1707.
Appendix E Gastrointestinal pathogens in sheep, goats and fish in PNG
E-9
top related