powerpoint presentation · pdf fileprogram chairperson mike mollison worley parsons secretary...

Post on 04-Feb-2018

225 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Brisbane SPE Section 13th May 2015

http://www.spe-qld.org/

• Safety Briefing • Safety Moment – Gladys Chang (QGC)

• Recognition of Sponsors • SPE Competency Management Tool – Mark Stone (DNRM)

• Committee Members • Upcoming Talks & SPE QLD Webpage • Lunch is Served around 12.30pm • Today’s Talk – Hydrocarbon pressure, free water levels, gas-water

contacts and how they link to capillary pressure. Why should I care?

• Q & A • Close around 1.45pm

Brisbane SPE Section

4

• ‘Beep Beep’ – Warning tone

• ‘Whoop Whoop’ -

Evacuate

• First Aid

• Restrooms

Brisbane SPE Section 11th March 2015

Gladys Chang (QGC)

Geo mechanics

Well Tests (DSTs, IFOTs)

Well Logs

Core data

Drilling Engineers Field Personnel

Geo modellers

Pipeline Engineers Field Personnel

• SPE Gold Sponsor - Weatherford

• SPE Silver Sponsor – Santos

• SPE Bronze Sponsor – Baker Hughes

• Other Sponsors – Schlumberger, Senex and Sigra

9

SPE Competency Management Tool (CMT)

Project Update, Fall 2014

10

11.2 Introduction

Drivers: Need for trained professionals rising with energy demand O&G industry losing experienced professionals to big crew-

change Limited number of graduating Engineers and Geoscientists How is the oil industry coping with these drivers? Hiring non-petroleum engineering graduates Emphasizing training and development Looking for ways to accelerate competency development

11

11.2 Board Guidance on SPE Role

Broaden training program to cover courses for all career stages

Offer a service where members can assess their own competencies, understand the gaps and engage in personal development through a self-paced learning program

CMT called for by the SPE Board Work Group on Lifelong Learning …

12

11.2 SPE’s CMT – Strategy

Help O&G industry address critical “Talent Gap” in a way that will: – Empower individual SPE members to do self assessments

– Identify gaps

– Develop a self-paced learning and development plan

– Leverage multiple training resources (Training Programs, SPE Books and Monographs, Technical Papers, Workshops, and Technical Conferences, SEG, etc.)

13

11.2 CMT Pilot – Summary

SPE considered three types of companies; Operating Co.’s, Service Co.’s, and EPC contractors; together they represent thousands of petro-technical jobs

The focus of the CMT Pilot phase is Operating Co.’s: –Scope limited to two career stages: Independent Contributor and

First-level Supervisor –Defined technical jobs covering a broad spectrum: –Partner with IHRDC; a reputable company with capability to deliver

SPE’s strategy

Pilot has been tested by SPE and now free to members

14

11.2 CMT Pilot – Summary

6 Disciplines

22 Job Titles

199 Competency Units

1,269 Training Resources

15

11.2 SPE CM Tool – Access

• The SPE Competency Management Tool is free to members

Presenter
Presentation Notes
How it works Important elements Walk through – high level Will break down the elements of how built

16

11.2 SPE CM Tool – Access

• The SPE Competency Management Tool is free to members

• Access is through the SPE Member Site

• Provides Single-sign on access to members

Presenter
Presentation Notes
How it works Important elements Walk through – high level Will break down the elements of how built

17

11.2 SPE CM Tool – Self-Assessment

• Member reviews disciplines

• Selects job title most closely aligned with their own

18

11.2 SPE CM Tool – Self-Assessment

• Member reviews disciplines

• Selects job title most closely aligned with their own

• Member progresses through a

self-assessment

• Assesses their skills against defined competency levels

19

• Clear description of knowledge and competence

• Self assesses their knowledge against the competency level

11.2 SPE CM Tool – Self-Assessment

20

• Determine and build their personal learning plan

• Member can track their progress against their selected competency model

• Can reassess themselves anytime

11.2 SPE CM Tool – Learning Plan

21

• Learning is hyperlinked to courses

• Leverages SPE training resources, books, monographs

• Can register from within the system

• Determine and build their personal learning plan

• Member can track their progress against their selected competency model

• Can reassess themselves anytime

11.2 SPE CM Tool – Learning Plan

22

11.2 SPE CMT – Forward Plan

Gauge interest by usage tracking Identify gaps to develop more robust SPE training programs Add more jobs for broader appeal Monitor for enhancements and improvements Success defined by:

– Robust use – Detailed feed back from users

Further details: contact mark.stone@dnrm.qld.gov.au or http://www.spe.org/training/cmt/

Chairperson Andrew White Santos Ltd.

Vice Chairperson Russell Byfield Strategy Central

Membership Chairperson Matika Storey Santos Ltd.

Program Chairperson Mike Mollison Worley Parsons

Secretary Naureen Alam Origin

SPE YP Chair Abhishek Rajora Westside Petroleum

CGSD Chairperson Natalie Chadud Origin

Treasurer Gladys Chang QGC - BG Group

Events Coordinator Lucie McMillan spe-qld@spe-qld.org

Section Director Raymond L Johnson Jr Unconv Reservoir Solutions

Sponsorship Chair Ahmad Teimoori Consultant

Continuing Education Chair Dean Sullivan Weatherford

Webmaster Sarah Bishop Origin admin@spe-qld.org

Aust Council Rep Russell Byfield Strategy Central

Past Chair Myron Chetty Total

• Thu, Jun 18th, 2015 Geoffrey Cann Opportunities amidst the oil and gas wreckage

• Wed, July 15th, 2015 Geoff Hunter Small-scale LNG liquefaction and the future Australian market

Brisbane SPE Section July 2013 Presented by Jim Underschultz, The University of Queensland

27

“Mindful organisations understand that long periods of success breed complacency and they are therefore wary of success. They are preoccupied with the possibility of failure. They hunt for lapses, errors and incongruencies, recognising that these may be the precursors to larger failures. They therefore have well developed systems for reporting near misses, process upsets and small and localised failures of all sorts. In short, they have well developed reporting cultures.”

Safety Culture, Mindfulness and Safe Behaviour: Converging ideas? December 2002 Andrew Hopkins

Disclaimer The information, opinions and views expressed in this presentation do not necessarily represent those of the University of Queensland, the UQ, Centre for Coal Seam Gas or its constituent members or associated companies. This presentation has not been independently peer reviewed and is not intended for wider publication.

Disclosure The UQ, Centre of Coal Seam Gas is currently funded by the University of Queensland 25% ($5 million) and the Industry members 75% ($15 million) over 5 years.

The centre conducts research across Water, Geoscience, Petroleum Engineering and Social Performance themes.

For more information about the Centre’s activities and governance see… http://www.ccsg.uq.edu.au/

Presenter
Presentation Notes
These are standard CCSG clauses

Analysts Briefing 2006

Different GOC’s

Different OWC’s

Faults play a roll

Paleo-oil columns from GOI

D

D

Free Water Level -2652mTVD

Free Oil Level at -2632mTVD

0.88 psi/m or 6.05kPa/m(0.62g/cc)

51.9API GOR=2168scf/bbl

46.9API52.8API GOR=684scf/bbl

1.42 psi/m or 9.81 kPa/m

46m head

2550

2555

2560

2565

2570

2575

2580

2585

2590

2595

2600

2605

2610

2615

2620

2625

2630

2635

2640

2645

2650

2655

2660

2665

2670

2675

2680

2685

2690

2695

2700

2705

2710

2715

2720

2725

27300.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00

Zeepaard

Birdrong

Mardie Greensand

Muderong

Chinook 1 Pressure-Elevation Plot and Gamma Log

0.39 psi/m or 2.67kPa/m

(0.27g/cc)

3780 3800 3820 3840 3860 3880 3900 3920 3940Pressure (psia)

-2730

-2720

-2710

-2700

-2690

-2680

-2670

-2660

-2650

-2640

-2630

-2620

-2610

-2600

-2590

-2580

-2570

-2560

-2550

Free Water Level at -2698mTVD

Free Oil Level at -2641mTVD

0.15 psi/m or 1.0kPa/m (.103g/cc)

1.42 psi/m or 9.81kPa/m41m head

64m head

2650

2655

2660

2665

2670

2675

2680

2685

2690

2695

2700

2705

2710

2715

2720

2725

2730

2735

2740

0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00Griffin 4 Pressure-Elevation Plot and V-Shale Log

Zeepaard

Birdrong

Mardie Greensand

0.9 psi/m or 6.21kPa/m (0.633g/cc)

3840 3850 3860 3870 3880 3890 3900 3910 3920 3930Pressure (psia)

-2715

-2710

-2705

-2700

-2695

-2690

-2685

-2680

-2675

-2670

-2665

-2660

-2655

-2650

-2645

-2640

-2635

-2630

CSIRO.

Schowalter (1979) shows that the capillary entry pressure:

(1) Pce =2γcosΘ/rt

where γ is the interfacial tension, Θ is the contact angle of hydrocarbon and water against the solid and rt is the radii of pore throats in the cap rock.

(2) PTp = ∆ρgH

where ∆ρ is the density contrast between the formation water and the hydrocarbon, g is the gravitational constant and H is the height of the hydrocarbon column above the Free Water Level (FWL) at the point the seal is breached.

Figure 3a. Highly permeable reservoir rock.

Figure 3b. Low permeability reservoir rock.

Wetting Phase Saturation (% pore volume)

Oil-water contactFree water level

Transition zone

Water-freeProduction

Capi

llary

Pre

ssur

e

Irred

ucib

le wa

ter sa

tura

tion

0 100

Wetting Phase Saturation (% pore volume)

Oil-water contactEntry Pressure

Entry Pressure

Displacement Pressure

Displacement Pressure

Free water level

Transition zone

Water-freeProduction

Capi

llary

Pre

ssur

e Irred

ucib

le wa

ter sa

tura

tion

0 100

Zeepaard ??

Birdrong ??

Also called Threshold Pressure

Pressure

2 3

Free Water Level

Free Oil Level

Cap Rock

Low k Reservoir

GOC

OWCOWC

GOC

1

Ele

vatio

n

FWL

FOL

Hydrostatic Case

OWC well 1

GOC well 1

Pressure

2 3

Free Water Level

Free Oil Level

Cap Rock

Low k Reservoir

GOC

OWCOWC

GOC

1

Ele

vatio

n

FWL

FOL

Hydrostatic Case

OWC well 1

GOC well 1

OWC well 2

Oil Displacement Press

H

PTp=∆ρgH

Pressure

2 3

Free Water Level

Free Oil Level

Cap Rock

Low k Reservoir

GOC

OWCOWC

GOC

1

Ele

vatio

n

FWL

FOL

Hydrostatic Case

OWC well 1

GOC well 1

OWC well 2

OWC well 3

GOC well 3

Gas Displacement Press.For low k layer

Oil Displacement Press

35

35

45

40

47

50

46

41

49

40

46

Zeepaard Hydraulic Head

But it isn’t hydrostatic at least in the water leg

Pressure

2 3

Free Water Level

Free Oil Level

Cap Rock

Low k Reservoir

Fluid Flow

GOC

OWC

OWC

OWC

GOC

1

Ele

vatio

nFOL

Hydrodynamic Case

OWC & FWL well 1

GOC well 1

Pressure

2 3

Free Water Level

Free Oil Level

Cap Rock

Low k Reservoir

Fluid Flow

GOC

OWC

OWC

OWC

GOC

1

Ele

vatio

nFOL

Hydrodynamic Case

OWC & FWL well 1

GOC well 1

FWL well 2

OWC well 2

Oil Displacement Press

Pressure

2 3

Free Water Level

Free Oil Level

Cap Rock

Low k Reservoir

Fluid Flow

GOC

OWC

OWC

OWC

GOC

1

Ele

vatio

nFOL

Hydrodynamic Case

OWC & FWL well 1

GOC well 1

FWL well 2

OWC well 2OWC & FWL well 3

GOC well 3

Gas Displacement Press.For low k layer

Oil Displacement Press

D

1.14 psi/m or 7.86kPa/m (0.8g/cc)

0.9 psi/m or 6.21kPa/m (0.633g/cc)

SG=0.76@25CGOR=53m3/m3 (low)

1.42 psi/m or 9.81kPa/m

24 psi (165kPa)Displacement P

35m head

Approx. Oil-water contact at -2694mTVD

SC

SC

SC

SC

Projected Free Water Level -2738mTVD

2650

2655

2660

2665

2670

2675

2680

2685

2690

2695

2700

2705

2710

2715

2720

2725

2730

2735

2740

2745

2750

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

mSS

Zeepaard

Birdrong

Mardie Greensand

Muderong

Ramillies 1Pressure-Elevation Plot and V-Shale Log

3850 3860 3870 3880 3890 3900 3910 3920 3930 3940 3950Pressure (psia)

-2750-2745-2740-2735-2730-2725-2720-2715-2710-2705-2700-2695-2690-2685-2680-2675-2670-2665-2660-2655-2650

~40m lower than G4

Griffin and Chinook-Scindian Pools

http://www.pressureplot.com/

Perm of Griffin West and East faults is lower than Zeepaard and E will likely be production barrier.

Birdrong Aquifer looks in places to have low (disconnected?) oil saturation at Griffin.

Combination of Capillarity and Hydrodynamic drive and possibly a current oil slosh can explain pressure distributions.

J.R. Underschultz. 2005. Pressure Distribution in a Reservoir affected by Capillarity and Hydrodynamic drive: Griffin Field, Northwest Shelf Australia. Geofluids Journal. V 5., p 221-235.

Prof Jim Underschultz The University of Queensland Email: j.Underschultz@uq.edu.au

If you are interested in research projects currently

underway at the Centre for Coal Seam Gas please visit our WEB page and click on each of the four research Themes: Water, Geoscience, Petroleum Engineering and Social Performance

http://www.ccsg.uq.edu.au/

top related