postverbal subjects in l2 english: a corpus-based study iclc, santiago de compostela 19 th september...

Postverbal subjects in L2 English: a corpus-based study

ICLC, Santiago de Compostela19th September 2005

Amaya Mendikoetxea amaya.mendikoetxea@uam.es

Cristóbal Lozano clozan2@yahoo.com Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

1. The phenomenon

Rutherford (1989), Oshita (2004): L1 Spanish – L2 English:

…it arrived the day of his departure… And then at last comes the great day. In every country exist criminals …after a few minutes arrive the girlfriend with his family too.

Only with unaccusative verbs (never with unergatives). Unaccusatives: arrive, happen, exist, come, appear,

live… Explanation: syntax-lexicon interface (unaccusatives)

2. Word order in native English

Very restricted: canonical word order SV. Four girls sang Four girls arrived

Lexicon-syntax interface (Levin & Rappaport-Hovav, etc): Unaccusative Hypothesis (Burzio 1986, etc)

*There sang four girls at the opera. There arrived four girls at the station.

Syntax-discourse interface (Biber et al, Birner, etc): Postverbal material tends to be focus (new info)

We have complimentary soft drinks and coffee. Also complimentary is red and white wine.

Syntax-Phonological Form (PF) interface (Arnold et al, etc) Heavy material is sentence-final (Principle of End-Weight, Quirk):

That money is important is obvious. It is obvious that money is important.

3. Word order in native Spanish

Lexicon-syntax interface:

Syntax-discourse interface:

UNERGATIVES: SVA: Qué pasó?

B: Un hombre gritó [SV]

UNACCUSATIVES: SVA: Qué pasó?

B: Llegó un hombre [VS]

UNERGATIVESA: Quién gritó?

B: Gritó un hombre [VS]

UNACCUSATIVESA: Quién llegó?

B: Llegó un hombre [VS]

Theoretical evidence: Zubizarreta 1998, Casielles-Suárez 2004, Domínguez 2004 Empirical evidence: Hertel 2000, 2003, Lozano 2003, 2006

4. Aim

VS order in L1 Spa – L2 Eng…

Lexicon-syntax interface: Only with unergatives, or with unaccusatives or both?

Syntax-PF interface: Postverbal subject: heavy or light?

Syntax-Discourse interface: Postverbal subject: topic or focus?

5. Method

Learner corpus: L1 Spa – L2 Eng ICLE Spanish subcorpus (Granger et al. 2002) UAM corpus

Query software: WordSmith v. 4.0 (Scott 2004)

Statistical software: SPSS v. 12.0

Corpus Number of essays Number of words ICLE Spanish 251 200,376 UAM 85 63,836 TOTAL 336 264,212

6. Data analysis (1)

Based on Levin (1993) and Levin & Rappaport-Hovav (1995): Unergatives: cough, cry, shout, speak, walk,

dance…[TOTAL: 41] Unaccusatives: exist, live, appear, emerge,

happen, arrive… [TOTAL: 34]

7. Data analysis (2)

CONCORDANCES: FILTERING CRITERIA: The verb must be intransitive (unergative or

unaccusative). The verb must be finite, active voice. The subject can appear either postverbally (VS) or

preverbally (SV). The subject must be an NP. The sentence can be either grammatical or

ungrammatical in native English. OTHER FILTERING CRITERIA (TOTAL=28)

8. Result: VS and unaccusativityTable 1: Proportion of postverbal subjects produced

Verb type # postverbal Subjects (VS)

# usable concordances

Rate

Unergative 0 181 0/181 (0%) Unaccusative 58 820 58/820 (7.1%)

9. Examples of production

Mostly S-V: The real problem appears when they have to look for their first job. …these people should exist.

But many V-S (58 in total): There exist positive means of earning money. So arised the Saint Inquisition. In the main plot appear the main characters: Volpone and Mosca.

*…it has appeared some cases of women that have killed their husbands. *…and from this moment begins the avarice. *…and appeared a lot more theatres.

10. Result: VS and specific unaccusative verbs

11. Result: VS and weight

HEAVY

Against this society drama emerged an opposition headed by Oscar Wilde and Bernard Shaw.

…so came the decline of the theatre.

Then come the necessity to earn more.

LIGHT

So arised the Saint Inquisition…

…and from there began a fire.

Still today … exists the bloody fights.

12. Result: SV and weight

HEAVY

…the cases of men mistreated do not appear in the media…

…a disintegration of culture, tradition and society would begin…

…the utopian societies created by the early socialists appeared.

LIGHT

…but they may appear everywhere.

…since the day eventually came…

…these people should exist, …

13. Result: VS and discourse

FOCUS

…there also exists a wide variety of optional channels which have to be paid.

So arised the Saint Inquisition.

In 1880 it begun the experiments whose result was the appearance of the television some years later.

TOPIC

…our modern world, dominated by science and technology and industrialisation …because exist the science technology and the industrialisation.

14. Result: SV and discourse

TOPIC

I use the Internet … I find windows … if they press on any of these windows … these windows cannot appear because a child could enter easily…

…the world of drugs: mafias … problems with mafias finished … dangerous people making money … no reason why these people should exist.

15. Summary/Conclusion

Vunacc NPsubjSyntax-discourse………………………………… FOCUSSyntax-PF …………………………………………. HEAVY

NPsubj VunaccSyntax-discourse…….. TOPICSyntax-PF……………… LIGHT

V S

S V

REFERENCES Arnold, J.E., Wasow, T., Losongco, A. and Ginstrom, R., 2000. Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering.

Language 76, 28-55. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., and Finegan, E., 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English (chapter 11). Harlow: Pearson Education

Limited. Birner, B.J., 1994. Information status and word order: An analysis of English inversion. Language 70, 233-259. Birner, B.J., 1995. Pragmatic constraints on the verb in English inversion. Lingua 97, 233-256. Birner, B.J. and Ward, G., 1996. A crosslinguistic study of postposing in discourse. Language and Speech 39, 113-142. Bresnan, 1994. Locative inversion and the architecture of Universal Grammar. Language 70, 71-131. Burzio, L., 1986. Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel. de Miguel, E., 1993. Construcciones ergativas e inversión en la lengua y la interlengua española. In: Liceras, J.M. (ed.), La lingüística y el análisis de los sistemas no

nativos, 178-195. Ottawa: Dovehouse. Domínguez, L., 2004. Mapping Focus: The Syntax and Prosody of Focus in Spanish. Boston University: Unpublished PhD dissertation. Eguren, L., Fernández Soriano, O., 2004. Introducción a una sintaxis minimista. Madrid: Gredos. Fernández-Soriano, O., 1993. Sobre el orden de palabras en español. Cuadernos de Filología Hispánica 11, 113-151. Granger, S., Dagneaux, E., and Meunier, F., 2002. International Corpus of Learner English [inc. CD ver 1.1]. Louvain: UCL Presses Universitaires de Louvain. Hertel, T.J., 2003. Lexical and discourse factors in the second language acquisition of Spanish word order. Second Language Research 19, 273-304. Hertel, T.-J. The second language acquisition of Spanish word order: lexical and discourse factors. 2000. Pennsylvania State University, PhD dissertation. Kaltenböck, G., 2004. It-extraposition and Non-extraposition in English: A Study of Syntax in Spoken and Written texts. Wilhem Braumüller. Levin, B., 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Levin, B. and Rappaport-Hovav, M., 1995. Unaccusativity at the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MASS: MIT Press. Liceras, J., Soloaga, B. and Carballo, A., 1994. Los conceptos de tema y rema: problemas sintácticos y estilísticos de la adquisición del español. Hispanic Linguistics 5,

43-88. Lozano, C., 2003. Universal Grammar and focus constraints: The acquisition of pronouns and word order in non-native Spanish. University of Essex: Unpublished PhD

dissertation. Lozano, C., forthcoming 2006. Focus and split intransitivity: The acquisition of word order alternations in non-native Spanish. Second Language Research 22. Lozano, C., in press b. The development of the syntax-information structure interface: Greek learners of Spanish. In: Torrens, V., Escobar, L. (eds.), The Acquisition of

Syntax in Romance Languages Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Ortega-Santos, I., 2005. On Locative Inversion and the EPP in Spanish. Paper presented at the VIII Encuentro Internacinoal de Lingüística del Noroeste, Universidad de

Sonora, México. Oshita, H., 2004. Is there anything there when there is not there? Null expletives and second language data. Second Language Research 20, 95-130. Perlmutter, D., 1978. Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society Berkeley:

University of California. Prince, E.F., 1981. Toward a Taxonomy of Given-New Information. In: Cole, P. (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, 223-255. London: Academic Press. Prince, E.F., 1992. The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness and information status. In: Thompson, S., Mann, W. (eds.), Discourse Description: Diverse Analyses of a Fund

Raising Text, 295-325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Rizzi, L., 1997. A parametric approach to comparative syntax: properties of the pronominal system. In: Haegeman, L. (ed.), The New Comparative Syntax, 268-285.

London: Longman. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J., 1972. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman. Scott, M., Oxford University Press. Oxford WordSmith Tools (version 4.0). Oxford. (Url: http://www.lexically.net/wordsmith/) Torrego, E., 1989. Unergative-Unaccusative Alternations in Spanish. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10, 253-272. Ward, G., Birner, B. and Huddleston, R., 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (chapter 16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Zagona, K., 2002. The Syntax of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Zobl, H., 1989. Canonical typological structures and ergativity in English L2 acquisition. In: Gass, S., Schachter, J. (eds.), Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language

Acquisition, 203-221. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Zubizarreta, M.L., 1998. Prosody, Focus, and Word Order. Cambridge, MASS: MIT Press.

Thank you!

Extraposition was discarded

NOTE: extraposition discarded: It only remains [to add that nowadays we live in a world…] It happened [that the countries which make the weapons are…]

Result: VS and (un)grammaticality

UNGRAMMATICAL

*Nevertheless, exist other means of obtaining money which are not so honourable, but quicker.

*…and from this moment begins the avarice.

*On the other hand, it has appeared some cases of women that have killed their husbands…

GRAMMATICAL

There exist positive means of earning money.

At the beginning of the play appear the main characters: Leontes, Hermione and Polixenes.

…and here emerges the problem.

Result: VS and (in)definiteness

DEFINITE

…because later could appear the real evidence and the real guilty.

…and usually appears the noble young man that either waste or has wasted his fortune.

In the main plot appear the main characters: Volpone and Mosca.

INDEFINITE

…some decades ago, it appeared a new invent: the television.

The play was very well performed and also appeared new elements in the stage.

…it has appeared some cases of women that have killed their husbands…

-0,5

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

Ingl int alto Ingl avanz Nativos esp

Med

ia d

el ju

icio

de

acep

tabi

lidad

Inerg Neut !VS

Inerg Neut SV

10. Resultados: léxico-sintaxis

¿Qué pasó?

Inacusativos (VS): Llegó un hombre Inergativos (SV): Un hombre gritó

-0,5

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

Ingl int alto Ingl avanz Nativos esp

Med

ia d

el ju

icio

de

acep

tabi

lidad

Inac Neut VS

Inac Neut !SV

sign.s. sig sig sign.s.

Length of postverbal subject

Heavy/Light scale

Type of VS structures

-0,5

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

Ingl int alto Ingl avanz Nativos esp

Med

ia d

el ju

icio

de

acep

tabi

lidad

Inerg Foc VS

Inerg Foc !SV

-0,5

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

Ingl int alto Ingl avanz Nativos esp

Med

ia d

el ju

icio

de

acep

tabi

lidad

Inac Foc VS

Inac Foc !SV

11. Resultados: sintaxis-discurso

¿Quién llegó / gritó?

Inacusativos (VS): Llegó un hombre Inergativos (SV): Gritó un hombre

sig sign.s.n.s. n.s.sig

Figure 1: Unaccusative verbs in neutral contexts (word order by group)

1,521,44

1,81

1,34

0,91 0,9 0,98

0,29

-0,5

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

Gk Upp Int Gk Low adv Gk Upp adv Natives

Mea

n ac

cept

abilit

y ra

te

Unac Neut VS

Unac Neut #SV

Figure 1: Unergative verbs in neutral contexts (word order by group)

0,87 0,84 0,9

-0,45

1,41 1,471,64 1,61

-0,5

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

Gk Upp Int Gk Low adv Gk Upp adv Natives

Mea

n ac

cept

abilit

y ra

te

Unerg Neut #VS

Unerg Neut SV

Figure 1: Unaccusative verbs in focused subject contexts (word order by group)

1,32 1,381,54 1,52

1,32

0,91 0,94

-0,28-0,5

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

Gk Upp Int Gk Low adv Gk Upp adv Natives

Mea

n ac

cept

abilit

y ra

te

Unac Foc VS

Unac Foc #SV

Figure 1: Unergative verbs in focused subject contexts (word order by group)

0,97 0,93

1,121,25

1,431,26 1,32

0,17

-0,5

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

Gk Upp Int Gk Low adv Gk Upp adv Natives

Mea

n ac

cept

abilit

y ra

te

Unerg Foc VS

Unerg Foc #SV

ST

3

SD T’ pro 3

T SV llegó 3 V SD

llegó un hombre

4. VS in native Spanish (1)Hipótesis Inacusativa

(interfaz léxico-sintaxis)

Inergativos: SV Inacusativos: VSA: ¿Qué pasó anoche en la reunión? B: Un hombre gritó. # Gritó un hombre.

A: ¿Qué pasó anoche en la reunión? B: # Un hombre llegó. Llegó un hombre.

ST

3

SD T’ un hombre 3

T SV gritó 3 SD V

un hombre gritó

ST

3

SD T’ pro 3

T SFoc llegó 3 SD Foc’ un hombre 3 [+Foc] Foc SV [+Foc] 3 V SD

llegó un hombre [+Foc]

ST

3

SD T’ pro 3

T SFoc gritó 3 SD Foc’ un hombre 3 [+Foc] Foc SV [+Foc] 3 SD V

un hombre gritó [+Foc]

5. VS in native Spanish (2)Foco presentacional

(interfaz sintaxis-discurso)

Inergativos: VS Inacusativos: VS

A: ¿Quién gritó anoche en la reunión? B: # Un hombre gritó. Gritó un hombre.

A: ¿Quién llegó anoche a la reunión? B: # Un hombre llegó. Llegó un hombre.

[-interp]

[+interp] [+interp]

[-interp]