performance of a semi-implicit, semi-lagrangian dynamical core for high resolution nwp over...

Post on 20-Jan-2018

215 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Computational grid

TRANSCRIPT

Performance of a Semi-Implicit, Semi-Lagrangian Dynamical Core

for High Resolution NWP over Complex Terrain

L.Bonaventura D.Cesari

Outline of discretization approach

• Semi-implicit, semi-lagrangian two time level discretization (2d tests: Bonaventura JCP 2000)

• Finite volume approach for the divergence• Weakly nonlinear system Ax+f(x)=b, symmetric

and well-conditioned for any orography• 2nd order in time, 4th order in space SL

advection scheme • Improved interpolation at the boundary for SL

advection (joint work with G.Rosatti, University of Trento)

Computational grid

Application to open channel flow

2D Gallus-Klemp lee wave test case

Vorticity=O(10e-4)

3D linear lee waves

Setup of tests for comparison of numerical efficiency

• 180*180*40 =O(1.3e+6) gridpoints• dx=2 km, dz=300 m, dt=40 s• Some 1000 m high mountains• A -8 K temperature anomaly (cold bubble) on top of

each mountain• IBM SP4 of CINECA (48 nodes with 16 CPUs each,

1.5 Ghz for each CPU)• native xlf90 compiler and all standard optimizations

switched on• Comparison against LokalModell of DWD

Parallel run with 16 processorsTotal CPU time for 1 hour

CPU time solver

COMM time solver

CPU time advection

COMM time advection

Fastest/slowest ratio

SE 328 s 91 s 13.4 s 156 s 40.8 s 1.07

SI Z

207 s 119 s 13.4 s 65.4 s 7.4 s 1.02

Parallel run with 36 processors(3D lee wave test)

Total CPU time for 1 hour

CPU time solver

COMMtime solver

Fastest/slowest ratio

SE 88.95 s 45.03 s 11.95 s 1.4 s

SI Z

56.40 s 26.16 s 5.12 s 1.03 s

Comparison of speed up

Comparison with terrain following semi-implicit LM

• Difficulty of a fair comparison (different stopping criteria and implementation details)

• Slower convergence of iterative solver for terrain following semi-implicit

Residual 1%of initial value

Residual 0.1% of initial value

Residual 0.01% of initial value

SI iterations 6 21 50SIZ iterations 8 17 21

Conclusions

• Semi-implicit, semi-lagrangian method using finite volume discretization of the divergence and improved lower boundary condition

• Gain in efficiency over terrain following coordinates, good parallel performance

Development plans

• Further testing (Boulder storm, Scania test)

• ARPA-SMR: development of a full SI-SL NWP model in the framework of the COSMO consortium adapting the LokalModell physics

• MPI: test tube for numerical methods to be used in ICON, the new global nonhydrostatic dynamical core

top related