open-ended feedback summary cluster-based meetings january-march 2011
Post on 06-Apr-2018
215 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
1/30
OPEN-ENDED FEEDBACKSUMMARY
CLUSTER-BASED MEETINGS
JANUARY 2011 MARCH 2011
This document summarizes feedback gathered from: Registration and Comment Sheets and video comments collected at DWP cluster-based meetings andCommunity Access Centers between January and March 2011, and Online survey responses collected between January and March 2011.
This document is produced by Community Legal Resources . Please direct questions to Elizabeth Luther (eluther@clronline.org, 313.969.7166).
mailto:eluther@clronline.orgmailto:eluther@clronline.org -
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
2/30
This document provides anoverview of the feedbackgathered through DetroitWorks Project cluster meetings.
These 11 meetings took place betweenJanuary 27th and March 10th, 2011.
Additionally, this overview analyzesinput provided through a survey on theDWP website.
Overview
1,630Participants
11DWP Meetings
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
3/30
Overview
QUESTIONS SUB-CATEGORIES1. What is your favorite place
in your neighborhood, otherthan your home? Please bespecific.
2. What projects or activities
are taking place in yourneighborhood that weshould be aware of?
3. What do you hope theDetroit Works Project will
do for your neighborhood?4. What would you like the
city of Detroit to look like in30 years?
5. Additional comments,including video comments
Gender | What is your gender?Response Count: 9052 Categories: Female, Male
Age | How old are you?Response Count: 9425 Categories: 17 or under, 18-34,
35-54, 55-74, 75 or older
Race/Ethnicity | How would youdescribe your racial or ethnicbackground?Response Count: 9325 Categories: Arab American,
Black/African American, Caucasian,Hispanic/Latino, Other
Geography (Planning Cluster)Mappable Addresses: 589Cluster meeting attendees who did not
provide addresses: 47
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
4/30
Overview
Meeting Attendees
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
5/30
Overview
Participants by Age and Geography
55-74
55-74
18-34
35-54 &
55-7435-54
THE AGE RANGE
SHOWN IS THE MOST
REPRESENTED RANGE
FROM EACH CLUSTER
55-74 years
35-54 & 55-74 years35-54 years18-34 years
NOTE: A high number of respondents did not choose an
age category; this map represents only respondents who
chose an age category.
MOST
REPRESENTED
AGE RANGE
35-54 &55-74
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
6/30
Overview
Participants by Race and Geography
THE RACE SHOWN IS THE MOST
REPRESENTED RACE FROM EACH CLUSTER
Caucasian
Black / African American
Black /
African American
Caucasian
HISPANIC/LATINORESPONDENTS
WERE MOST REPRSENTED IN CLUSTER 5
THOSE WHO CHOSE OTHERWERE
MOST REPRESENTED IN CLUSTER 4
Caucasian
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
7/30
Overview
Participants by Age and Race
Caucasian
Caucasian
2
2
10
7
14
11
1
9
15
20
2
2
3
33
18
20
1
7
2
137
83
152
12
14
10
52
146
155
17
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Blank [26]
17 or under [24]
18-34 [245]
35-54 [281]
55-74 [360]
75 or older [32]
Black/African American [394]
Hispanic/Latino [47]
No race selected [36]
Arab American [21] Other [77]
Caucasian [393]
OLDER
YOUNGER
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
8/30
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSETS
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
9/30
Neighborhood Assets
What is your favorite place in your neighborhood, other than your home?
851524Responses
Park,
recreation area
or center,natural feature,
open space
34%
Restaurant, bar,
coffee shop
11%
Neighborhood
11%
Religious
institution7%
Grocery store,
farmers market
6%
Retail, commercial
node or corridor5%
Community center
5%
Communityorganization, social
service provider,
nonprofit service orproject
4%
School, university
4%
Library
3%
Community
garden
3%
Nothing
3%
Historic or
architectural
landmark2%
Museum, cultural
institution,
theater, public art2%
Favorite
Places
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
10/30
Neighborhood Assets
Favorite Places
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
11/30
Neighborhood Assets
Favorite Places (by Residents Cluster)
Community
Centers &
Nonprofits
. . . coffee shops,
retail, commerce
. . . greenways,open space
Community centers,nonprofits
Restaurants,bars . . . Schools, museums,
libraries, galleries
Parks . . .
Religious . . .
Food access,
gardens
. . . institutions
THIS MAP SHOWS GENERAL TRENDS
IN RESPONDENTS FAVORITE TYPES
OF NEIGHBORHOOD LOCATIONS
ACROSS THE CITY
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
12/30
Neighborhood Assets
58%. . . of respondents fromCluster 3 chose a park,
recreation center, naturalfeature, or open space.
1.5 times. . . more likely than allparticipants to choose
restaurants, bars, coffee shops,and other entertainment venues.
Neighborhood Assets Trends
Males were
25%. . . of respondents fromCluster 1 chose a school,
university, museum, library,or gallery.
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
13/30
NEIGHBORHOOD ACTIVITY
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
14/30
Neighborhood Activity
What projects or activities are taking place in yourneighborhood that we should be aware of?
>525Organizationsand Projects
435ResponsesCommunity
organizations
15%
Appearance
14%
Safety
11%
Food access,
urban ag9%
Parks, rec, open
space6%
General
improvements5%
Education,
training
5%
Cultural
initiatives
5%
Jobs, commerce
4%
Development
4%
Vacancy
4%
Housing
4%
Nothing
3%
The environment
3%
Collaboration
2%
Institutions
2%
Reuse, historic
preservation
1%
City services,
accessibility
1%
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
15/30
Neighborhood Activity
>525 ORGANIZATIONS & PROJECTS
NOTE: LARGER FONTS INDICATE THAT MORE RESPONDENTS MENTIONED A PARTICULAR ORGANIZATION OR PROJECT.
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
16/30
28%. . . of respondentsfrom Cluster 10mentioned safety andpatrols.
Neighborhood Activity Trends
Neighborhood Activity
24%. . . of Cluster 8 respondents
mentioned food access, i.e.urban agriculture andmarkets.
3.6 times
Respondents from
Cluster 3 were
. . . more likely than all participants tosuggest there was nothing or no
initiatives taking place in their
neighborhoods.
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
17/30
DWP NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
18/30
What do you hope the Detroit Works Project will do for your neighborhood?
DWP Neighborhood Impact
Responses
536
NOTE: LARGER FONTS INDICATE THAT MORE RESPONDENTS MENTIONED A PARTICULAR T YPE OF NEIGHBORHOOD PROBLEM/IMPROVEMENT.
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
19/30
DWP Neighborhood Impact
IM
PR
OV
E
Quality of life,
general
development11%
Jobs,
commerce
10%
Safety
10%
City services,
neighborhood
presence
10%
Parks, open space,
recreation opportunities
8%
Alternate transportation
7%
Housing,
infill
6%
Appearance,
cleanliness, blight
5%
Collaboration (e.g. w/
neighborhood orgs)5%
Community
organizing
5%
Education, training
4%
Density, land use
4%
Food access, urban ag
4%
Environment,
public health
3%
Repopulation
2%
Cultural amenities
2%
Building reuse, historic
preservation
2%
Programming
2%
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
20/30
DWP Neighborhood Impact
RED
UC
E
Vacancy
45%
Blight
19%
Crime
19%
Pollution
5%
Foreclosures,
homelessness5%
Undesirable businesses
3%Tax burden
2%
Misguided development
1%
General/Other
1%
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
21/30
2.1 times
Respondentsaged18-34 were
Neighborhood Impact Trends
16%. . . of respondents from
Cluster 5 mentioned City
services, accountability,transparency, and capacity.
15%. . . of Cluster 3
respondents mentionedhousing improvements.
DWP Neighborhood Impact
. . . more likely than allparticipants to mention
improvements to public andnon-motorized transportation.
1.6 times. . . more likely than allparticipants to mention
building reuse and historicpreservation.
Females were
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
22/30
FUTURE DETROIT
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
23/30
What would you like the city of Detroit to look like in 30 years?
Future Detroit
NOTE: LARGER FONTS INDICATE THAT MORE RESPONDENTS MENTIONED A PARTICULAR ASPECT OF FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS FOR DETROIT.
525Responses
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
24/30
Future Detroit
IM
PR
OV
E
Appearance,
cleanliness,beauty
16%
Public & non-
motorized
transportation
12%
Jobs, commerce
11%
Education, training
8%Other7%
City services,
administration
7%
Safety
6%
Parks, greenways,
recreation
6%
Diversity
5%
Environment
4%
Community
organizations
4%
Food access, urban ag
4%
Land use, density
4%Housing
3% Cultural amenities
3%
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
25/30
RED
UC
E
Crime23%
Vacancy,
abandonment
20%
Blight13%
City incentives,
corruption, tax burden
12%
Population, footprint
10%
Pollution
8%
Foreclosures, absentee
landlords
5%
Undesirable businesses
4%
Distrust, generally
2%Auto dependency
2%Illiteracy
1%
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
26/30
Future Detroit
BUILD A MORE
ATTRACTIVE CITY
FOR THESE POPULATIONS:
DETROIT COULD
LOOK LIKE . . .
NOTE: LARGER FONTS INDICATE THAT MORE RESPONDENTS
MENTIONED A PARTICULAR COMPARISON CITY / POPULATIONS.
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
27/30
Future Detroit Trends
Future Detroit
3.6 times
Those who selected Otheras their race were
17%. . . of those aged 18-34mentioned a city withfunctional public transportation
(light rail, buses) and bicycleand pedestrian facilities.
11%. . . of those aged 35 74hoped for an increase injobs and commercial
activity in the city.
1.4 times. . . more likely than all
participants to mentiondiversity (racial, cultural,
neighborhood, economic).
Males were
. . . more likely than all
participants to mentioncollaboration between the
City and neighborhoodinitiatives and plans.
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
28/30
THE DETROIT WORKS PROJECT
PROCESS
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
29/30
DWP Process
Civic
engagement
35%
Presentation,
agenda
13%
Communication
11%
Keypoint
(clickers)
10%
Project
purpose
10%
Collaboration
8%
Other
8%
Audience
questions5%
175Responses
Comments about the Detroit Works Project process:
-
8/3/2019 Open-Ended Feedback Summary Cluster-Based Meetings January-March 2011
30/30
DWP Process
Civic Engagement Dialogue and discussion
Engage wider population
Presentation & Agenda
Best practices, success stories City staff representation
Communication Transparency
Web interface, access, updates
Keypoint Clickers Quality/neutrality of questions, choices
156 SUGGESTED
IMPROVEMENTS
Project Purpose Clarify DWP message, vision, mission
Collaboration Engage neighborhood organizations, CDCs
Audience questions Quality of Citys response
Respond directly to all
top related