ontario ministry of the environment and climate change ... 218666.pdf · authorized person marian...
Post on 01-Oct-2020
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition # 218666
Record of Site Condition
Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act
Summary
Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence
This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has
access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings
with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental
condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry.
Contents of this Record of Site Condition
This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from
the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been
submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change.
Record of Site Condition Number 218666Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 2015/08/17Certification Date 2014/10/14Current Property Use InstitutionalIntended Property Use ParklandCertificate of Property Use Number No CPUApplicable Site Condition Standards** Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard,
with Non-potable Ground Water, CoarseTextured Soil, for Parkland property use
Property Municipal Address 558 GERRARD STREET EAST, TORONTO,ON, M4M 1X8
1 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 218666 on 2015/08/17
PART 1: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, PROPERTY INFORMATION AND OWNER'S CERTIFICATIONS
Information about the owner who is submitting or authorizing the submission of the RSC
Owner Name BRIDGEPOINT HEALTH
Authorized Person MARIAN WALSH
Mailing Address 14 ST. MATTHEWS ROAD, TORONTOONTARIO, CANADA
Postal Code M4M 2B5
Phone (416) 461-8252
Fax (416) 461-1670
Email Address mwalsh@bridgepointhealth.ca
2 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 218666 on 2015/08/17
RSC Property Location Information
Municipal Address(es) 558 GERRARD STREET EAST, TORONTO, ON M4M 1X8
Municipality Toronto
Legal Description See Attached Lawyer’s Letter
Assessment Roll Number(s)
1904-075-110-00103
Property Identifier Number(s)
21068-0103 (LT)
RSC Property Geographical References
Coordinate System UTM
Datum NAD 83
Zone 17
Easting 632,728.00
Northing 4,836,049.00
RSC Property Use Information
The following types of property uses are defined by the Regulation: Agricultural or other use, Commercial use, Community use, Industrial use, Institutional use, Parkland use, and Residential use.
Current Property Use Institutional
Intended Property Use Parkland
Certificate of Property Use has been issued under section 168.6 of the EPA
No
3 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 218666 on 2015/08/17
Please See the Signed Statements of Property Owner, or Agent, or Receiver at the End of this RSC
The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank
4 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 218666 on 2015/08/17
PART 2: LIST OF REPORTS, SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS AND QUALIFIED PERSON’S STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONSQualified Person's Information
Name SERENA CHRISTINE OYAMA
Type of Membership Under the Professional Geoscientists Act
Limited Member
Membership Number 2460
QP Employer Name TERRAPROBE INC.
Mailing Address 11 INDELL LANE, BRAMPTONONTARIO, L6T 3Y3 CANADA
Phone (905) 796-2650
Fax (905) 796-2250
Email Address soyama@terraprobe.ca
Municipal Information
Local or Single-Tier Municipality
Toronto
Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change District Office
District Office Toronto District Office
District Office Address 5775 Yonge St., 8th floor, North York ON M2M 4J1
5 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 218666 on 2015/08/17
Phase One Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase one environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing
The date the last work on all of the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance components of the phase one environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 28(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)
(YYYY/MM/DD)
2014-04-16
Type of Report
Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD)
Author of Report
Name of ConsultingCompany
P1 ESA Phase One Environmental Site Assessment: Parts 25, 26 & 27, Plan 66R-24227, Part of Lot 15, Concession 1 FTB, City of Toronto, Ontario
2015-02-19 Serena Oyama, Paul Bowen
TERRAPROBE INC.
Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase One Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in certifying the information set out in section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase one environmental site assessment
Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD)
Author of Report
Name of ConsultingCompany
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment: Bridgepoint Lands, Toronto, Ontario
2008-12-01 Valentina Ulloa, Chris Farias
Golder Associates
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment: Land Parcels P1 to P4, Bridgepoint Health/Don Jail Site, Toronto, Ontario
2008-04-01 Adam Affleck, Chris Farias
Golder Associates
6 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 218666 on 2015/08/17
Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase two environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing
The date the last work on all of the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site investigation components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 33.5(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)
(YYYY/MM/DD)
2014-10-14
Type of Report
Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD)
Author of Report
Name of ConsultingCompany
P2 ESA Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment: Part 25, Part of Lot 15, Conc. 1 From the Bay, Toronto, Ontario
2015-02-25 Russ Pagulayan, Serena Oyama
TERRAPROBE INC.
P2 ESA Update
Updated Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment: Part 25, Part of Lot 15, Conc. 1 From the Bay, Toronto, Ontario
2015-07-06 Russ Pagulayan, Serena Oyama
TERRAPROBE INC.
Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase Two Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in making any certifications in the RSC for the purposes of Part IV of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase two environmental site assessment
Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD).
Author of Report
Name of ConsultingCompany
N/A
7 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 218666 on 2015/08/17
Environmental ConditionSection 41 applies? No
Section 43.1 applies? No
Site Condition InformationCertification date (YYYY/MM/DD) 2014/10/14
Total area of RSC property (in hectares) 0.24800
Number of any previously filed RSC that applies to any part of the RSC property
Number of any previously filed Transition Notice that applies to any part of the RSC property
Soil Texture Coarse
Assessment/Restoration Approach Full Depth Generic
Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of ground water? Yes
Is there soil present that is sufficient to investigate, sample and analyze soil on, in or under the property in accordance with s. 6, Schedule E of O.Reg. 153/04?
Yes
Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of soil on, in or under the property which is used in the RSC?
Yes
Name of the laboratory used to analyze any samples collected of soil, ground water or sediment
MAXXAM ANALYTICS
Ground water condition (potable, non-potable) Non-potable
Applicable Site Condition Standard TABLE 3
Local or single-tier municipality non-potable written notification date 2015/06/15
8 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 218666 on 2015/08/17
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
1 Boron (Hot Water Soluble)* 0.82 1.5 µg/g
2 Chromium VI < 0.2 8 µg/g
3 Cyanide (CN-) 0.02 0.051 µg/g
4 Mercury 0.15 0.27 µg/g
5 Acetone < 0.5 16 µg/g
6 Bromomethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
7 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
8 Chlorobenzene < 0.05 2.4 µg/g
9 Chloroform < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
10 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.05 3.4 µg/g
11 Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- < 0.05 4.8 µg/g
12 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- < 0.05 0.083 µg/g
13 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.05 16 µg/g
14 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.05 3.5 µg/g
15 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
16 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
17 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.05 3.4 µg/g
18 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.05 0.084 µg/g
19 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
20 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.03 0.05 µg/g
21 Ethylene dibromide < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
22 Hexane (n) < 0.05 2.8 µg/g
23 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 0.5 16 µg/g
24 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 0.5 1.7 µg/g
25 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.05 0.75 µg/g
26 Methylene Chloride < 0.05 0.1 µg/g
27 Styrene < 0.05 0.7 µg/g
28 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.05 0.058 µg/g
29 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
30 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.05 0.28 µg/g
31 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.05 0.38 µg/g
32 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
33 Trichloroethylene < 0.05 0.061 µg/g
34 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.05 4 µg/g
35 Vinyl Chloride < 0.02 0.02 µg/g
...Continued on next page
9 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 218666 on 2015/08/17
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil
Continued from previous page....
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
36 Bromodichloromethane < 0.05 13 µg/g
37 Bromoform < 0.05 0.27 µg/g
38 Dibromochloromethane < 0.05 9.4 µg/g
39 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 10 55 µg/g
40 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 10 98 µg/g
41 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 < 50 300 µg/g
42 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 < 50 2800 µg/g
43 Acenaphthene 0.023 7.9 µg/g
44 Acenaphthylene 0.012 0.15 µg/g
45 Anthracene 0.069 0.67 µg/g
46 Benz[a]anthracene 0.18 0.5 µg/g
47 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.16 0.3 µg/g
48 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.22 0.78 µg/g
49 Benzo[ghi]perylene 0.12 6.6 µg/g
50 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.084 0.78 µg/g
51 Chrysene 0.16 7 µg/g
52 Dibenz[a h]anthracene 0.026 0.1 µg/g
53 Fluoranthene 0.42 0.69 µg/g
54 Fluorene 0.033 62 µg/g
55 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene 0.12 0.38 µg/g
56 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** 0.011 0.99 µg/g
57 Naphthalene 0.012 0.6 µg/g
58 Phenanthrene 0.29 6.2 µg/g
59 Pyrene 0.35 78 µg/g
60 Antimony 0.63 7.5 µg/g
61 Arsenic 4.9 18 µg/g
62 Selenium < 0.5 2.4 µg/g
63 Barium 64 390 µg/g
64 Beryllium 0.29 4 µg/g
65 Boron (total) 5.5 120 µg/g
66 Cadmium 0.42 1.2 µg/g
67 Chromium Total 9.8 160 µg/g
68 Cobalt 2.9 22 µg/g
69 Copper 17 140 µg/g
70 Lead 96 120 µg/g
...Continued on next page
10 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 218666 on 2015/08/17
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil
Continued from previous page....
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
71 Molybdenum < 0.5 6.9 µg/g
72 Nickel 6.6 100 µg/g
73 Silver < 0.2 20 µg/g
74 Thallium 0.08 1 µg/g
75 Uranium 0.38 23 µg/g
76 Vanadium 27 86 µg/g
77 Zinc 94 340 µg/g
78 Benzene < 0.02 0.21 µg/g
79 Ethylbenzene < 0.02 2 µg/g
80 Toluene < 0.02 2.3 µg/g
81 Xylene Mixture < 0.02 3.1 µg/g
11 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 218666 on 2015/08/17
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)
Ground Water
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
1 Chromium VI < 0.5 140 µg/L
2 Cyanide (CN-) < 2 66 µg/L
3 Mercury < 0.1 0.29 µg/L
4 Acetone < 10 130000 µg/L
5 Bromomethane < 0.5 5.6 µg/L
6 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.2 0.79 µg/L
7 Chlorobenzene < 0.2 630 µg/L
8 Chloroform < 0.2 2.4 µg/L
9 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.5 4600 µg/L
10 Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- < 0.5 9600 µg/L
11 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- < 0.5 8 µg/L
12 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 1 4400 µg/L
13 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.2 320 µg/L
14 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L
15 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.2 1.6 µg/L
16 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L
17 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L
18 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.2 16 µg/L
19 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.3 5.2 µg/L
20 Ethylene dibromide < 0.2 0.25 µg/L
21 Hexane (n) < 1 51 µg/L
22 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 10 470000 µg/L
23 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 5 140000 µg/L
24 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.5 190 µg/L
25 Methylene Chloride < 2 610 µg/L
26 Styrene < 0.5 1300 µg/L
27 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.5 3.3 µg/L
28 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.5 3.2 µg/L
29 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.2 1.6 µg/L
30 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.2 640 µg/L
31 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.5 4.7 µg/L
32 Trichloroethylene < 0.2 1.6 µg/L
33 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.5 2500 µg/L
34 Vinyl Chloride < 0.2 0.5 µg/L
35 Bromodichloromethane < 0.5 85000 µg/L
...Continued on next page
12 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 218666 on 2015/08/17
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)
Ground Water
Continued from previous page....
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
36 Bromoform < 1 380 µg/L
37 Dibromochloromethane < 0.5 82000 µg/L
38 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 25 750 µg/L
39 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 100 150 µg/L
40 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 < 200 500 µg/L
41 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 < 200 500 µg/L
42 Acenaphthene < 0.05 600 µg/L
43 Acenaphthylene < 0.05 1.8 µg/L
44 Anthracene < 0.05 2.4 µg/L
45 Benz[a]anthracene < 0.05 4.7 µg/L
46 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.01 0.81 µg/L
47 Benzo[b]fluoranthene < 0.05 0.75 µg/L
48 Benzo[ghi]perylene < 0.05 0.2 µg/L
49 Benzo[k]fluoranthene < 0.05 0.4 µg/L
50 Chrysene < 0.05 1 µg/L
51 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < 0.05 0.52 µg/L
52 Fluoranthene < 0.05 130 µg/L
53 Fluorene < 0.05 400 µg/L
54 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene < 0.05 0.2 µg/L
55 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** < 0.05 1800 µg/L
56 Naphthalene 0.05 1400 µg/L
57 Phenanthrene 0.085 580 µg/L
58 Pyrene < 0.05 68 µg/L
59 Antimony < 0.5 20000 µg/L
60 Arsenic < 2 1900 µg/L
61 Selenium 4.3 63 µg/L
62 Barium 150 29000 µg/L
63 Beryllium < 0.5 67 µg/L
64 Boron (total) 98 45000 µg/L
65 Cadmium < 0.1 2.7 µg/L
66 Chromium Total < 5 810 µg/L
67 Cobalt 5.9 66 µg/L
68 Copper 6.1 87 µg/L
69 Lead 0.69 25 µg/L
70 Molybdenum 9.4 9200 µg/L
...Continued on next page
13 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 218666 on 2015/08/17
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)
Ground Water
Continued from previous page....
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
71 Nickel 11 490 µg/L
72 Silver < 0.1 1.5 µg/L
73 Thallium < 0.05 510 µg/L
74 Uranium 5.4 420 µg/L
75 Vanadium 1.8 250 µg/L
76 Zinc 10 1100 µg/L
77 Benzene < 0.2 44 µg/L
78 Ethylbenzene < 0.2 2300 µg/L
79 Toluene < 0.2 18000 µg/L
80 Xylene Mixture < 0.2 4200 µg/L
14 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 218666 on 2015/08/17
Remedial Action and Mitigation
Remediated Soils
Estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have been remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the soil. Indicate the remediation process or processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process.
Soil Remediation Process Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³)
none
Description of Remediation
Description of any action taken to reduce the concentration of contaminants (including soil removals) on, in or under the RSC property.
Fill soil was removed from the RSC Property
Soil or Sediment Removed and Not Returned
Estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.
Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³) 4.5
Estimated Quantity of Sediment (in-ground volume in m³) 0.0
Soil Brought to the Property
Estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the RSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property and that is identified in section 28 of Schedule A.
Estimated Quantity of Soil Brought to the Property(in-ground volume in m³)
0.0
15 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 218666 on 2015/08/17
Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures
Ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing.
none
Ground water control or treatment measures that are required for the RSC property after the certification date.
none
Estimated volume of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.
Estimated Volume of Ground Water (in litres) 0.0
16 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 218666 on 2015/08/17
Other Activities Including Risk Management Measures
Constructed works that prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing, were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.
none
Constructed works that after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.
none
Monitoring or Maintenance
Soil Management Measures
Soil monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or replacement or any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.
none
Ground Water Management Measures
Ground water monitoring requirements or requirements for care, maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works or known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.
none
Remediated or Removed Soil, Sediment or Ground Water From Near Property Boundary
Has any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the RSC property boundary been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation?
No
17 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 218666 on 2015/08/17
Qualified Person’s Statements and CertificationsAs the qualified person, I certify that:
A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.
A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.
The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only and the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary.
As of 2014/10/14, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling, there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC property will be put, as specified in the RSC.
Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.
I have, within the six months immediately before the submission of this record of site condition, given written notice of intention to apply non-potable ground water site condition standards to the clerk of the local municipality in which the property is located and the clerk of any upper-tier municipality in which the property is located.
As of 2014/10/14, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase two environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the applicable full depth generic site condition standards prescribed by section 37 of the regulation for all contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which this RSC is filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment.
As of 2014/10/14, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant in soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards.
I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation.
I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation.
I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry.
The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location.
I do not hold and have not held and my employer TERRAPROBE INC.does not hold and has not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessmentor risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based
To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSCare true as of 2014/10/14.
By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees.
By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, SERENA CHRISTINE OYAMA, a qualified person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2015/07/10:
a) signing this record of site condition submission as a qualified person; and b) making all certifications required as a qualified person for this record of site condition.
I Agree
18 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 218666 on 2015/08/17
Additional Documentation Provided by Property Owner or AgentThe following documents have been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Changeas part of the record of site condition
Certificate of Status or equivalent for the owner
Lawyer’s letter consisting of a legal description of the property
Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) by which the RSC property was acquired
A Current plan of Survey
A copy of No Objection Statement from municipality
Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern
Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property
Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model
Owner or agent certification statements
6.1.2
19 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 218666 on 2015/08/17
20 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 218666 on 2015/08/17
Certificate of ComplianceLoi canadienne sur les organisations à but non
lucratif art. 290Canada Not-for-profit Corporations Act s. 290
Certificat de conformité
Bridgepoint Health
389110-1
Corporate name / Dénomination de l'organisation
Corporation number / Numéro del'organisation
Virginie Ethier
Issuance date (YYYY-MM-DD)Date d'émission (AAAA-MM-JJ)
Director / Directeur
2015-07-09
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above-namedcorporation:
• existe en vertu de la Loi canadienne sur lesorganisations à but non lucratif;
• exists under the Canada Not-for-profitCorporations Act;
• has filed the required annual returns; and • a déposé les rapports annuels exigés; et
JE CERTIFIE, par la présente, quel'organisation susmentionnée :
• has paid all prescribed fees required. • a acquitté tous les droits prescrits exigibles.
Phase One ESA Property
Phase Two ESA and RSC Property Area
X:\1
-Pro
ject
File
s\13
-Env
\201
4\13
-14-
4023
\A. D
wgs
, Log
s\Au
toCA
D\13
-14-
4023
-1 F
IGS
-Spl
ited.
dwg,
Em
man
uel
"TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN"(Refer to clause 16(2)(a), Schedule D, O. Reg. 153/04)
Area of Potential Environmental Concern
Location of Area of Potential Environmental Concern on Phase One
PropertyPotentially Contaminating
Activity
Location of PCA (on-site or off-site)
Contaminants of Potential Concern
Media Potentially Impacted (Ground water, soil and/or
sediment)
#28 - Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks
Other - Ontario Spills
Other - O.Reg 347 Waste Generators
APEC 2 On entire Property #30 - Importation of Fill Material of Unknown Quality
On-site Metals, As, Sb, Se, Cr(VI), Hg, B-HWS, high pH, CN-, low pH, PAHs
Soil and ground water
Notes:
1 ‐ Area of Potential Environmental Concern means the area on, in or under a phase one property where one or more contaminants are potentially present,
as determined through the phase one environmental site assessment, including through,
(a) identification of past or present uses on, in or under the phase one property, and
(b) identification of potentially contaminating activity.
2 ‐ Potentially Contaminating Activity means a use or activity set out in Column A of Table 2 of Schedule D that is occurring or has occurred in a
phase one study area
3 ‐ when completing this column, identify all contaminants of potential concern using the Method Groups as identified in the
"Protocol for in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, March 9, 2004, amended as of July 1, 2011, as specified below:
ABNs PCBs Metals Electrical Conductivity SARCPs PAHs As,Sb,Se Cr(VI)1,4‐Dioxane THMs Na HgDioxins/Furans, PCDDs/PCDFs VOCs B‐HWS Methyl MercuryOcs BTEX Cl‐ high pHPHCs Ca, Mg CN‐ low pH4 ‐ when submitting a record of site condition for filing, a copy of this table must be attached
On entire PropertyAPEC 1 Off site PHCs, BTEX, VOCs Soil and ground water
"TABLE OF CURRENT AND PAST USES OF THE PHASE ONE PROPERTY"(Refer to clause 16(2)(b), Schedule D, O. Reg. 153/04)
Year Name of Owner Description of Property Use Property Use Other Observations from Aerial Photographs, Fire Insurance Plans, Etc.
2003 - present Bridgepoint Health (name change from Riverdale Centre for Continuing Care)
Site Visit: buildings are occupied by medical offices/charities associated with Bridgepoint Health. Remainder of property covered by open space/parkland
2002 - 2003 The Riverdale Centre for Continuing Care
No other observations
1992 AP: Same two structures present on Property
1985 CD: buildings now occupied by charities (John Howard Society & Street Link Family and Friend)
1971, 1983 Aps: Same two structures present on site
1947, 1957, 1962 APs: Same two residential structures present as shown on the 1890 - 1913 FIPs
1927, 1940, 1954 & 1965 CDs: Buildings listed as residential homes
1890 to 1913 FIPs: Property occupied by two small structures; assumed to be houses1884 FIP: Property vacant and undeveloped
1840 - 1857 Rev. Henry Scadding No other observations1796 - 1840 John Scadding No other observations
Prior to 1796 Crown UndevelopedAgricultural or other use
Crown land undeveloped
Notes:1 ‐ for each owner, specify one of the following types of property use (as defined in O.Reg. 153/04) that applies
Agricultural or other useCommercial useCommunity useIndustrial useInstitutional useParkland useResidential use
2 ‐ when submitting a record of site condition for filing, a copy of this table must be attached.
The Corporation of the City of Toronto1857 - 1970
Undeveloped Agricultural or other use
Occupied by two institutional use buildings (part of the Bridgepoint Health complex)
Institutional use
Residential useResidential
Occupied by two small structures ‐ houses converted to medical offices
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario Represented by the Chair of the Management Board of Cabinet
1970 - 2002 Institutional use
Terraprobe
Consulting Geotechnical & Environmental Engineering Construction Materials Inspection & Testing
Terraprobe Inc.Greater Toronto Hamilton – Niagara Central Ontario Northern Ontario 11 Indell Lane 903 Barton Street, Unit 22 220 Bayview Drive, Unit 25 1012 Kelly Lake Rd., Unit 1 Brampton, Ontario L6T 3Y3 Stoney Creek, Ontario L8E 5P5 Barrie, Ontario L4N 4Y8 Sudbury, Ontario P3E 5P4 (905) 796-2650 Fax: 796-2250 (905) 643-7560 Fax: 643-7559 (705) 739-8355 Fax: 739-8369 (705) 670-0460 Fax: 670-0558
www.terraprobe.ca
UPDATED PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL PART 25, PART OF LOT 15, CONC. 1 FROM THE BAY
CITY OF TORONTO, ONTARIO
File No 13-14-4022 Revised July 6, 2015
©Terraprobe Inc.
Updated Phase Two Conceptual Site Model July 6, 2015 Part 25 of Lot 15, Plan 66R-24227, City of Toronto, Ontario 13-14-4022
Terraprobe Page No ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Property Description ........................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Summary of Previous Investigations .................................................................................. 2
2.0 INFORMATION FROM THE PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT .......... 6 2.1 Areas Where Potentially Contaminating Activity has occurred ......................................... 6 2.2 Areas of Potential Environmental Concern ........................................................................ 6 2.3 Subsurface Structures and Utilities ..................................................................................... 7
3.0 PHYSICAL SETTING OF THE PHASE TWO PROPERTY ........................................................ 8 3.1 Site Stratigraphy ................................................................................................................. 8 3.2 Approximate Depth to Water Table .................................................................................... 8 3.3 Site Hydrogeological Characteristics .................................................................................. 9 3.4 Approximate Depth to Bedrock .......................................................................................... 9 3.5 Section 41 or 43.1 ............................................................................................................... 9 3.6 Soils Placed On, In or Under the Phase Two Property ....................................................... 9 3.7 Proposed Buildings ........................................................................................................... 10
4.0 CONTAMINATION IN OR UNDER THE PHASE TWO PROPERTY ..................................... 11 4.1 Applicable Site Condition Standard .................................................................................. 11 4.2 Media Investigated ............................................................................................................ 11 4.3 Sampling Rational ............................................................................................................. 12 4.4 Areas Where Contaminants are Present ............................................................................ 12 4.5 Contaminants Associated with Each Area ........................................................................ 13 4.6 Medium in Which Contaminants are Associated .............................................................. 13 4.7 Information Known about Each Contaminated Area ........................................................ 14 4.8 Distribution of Contaminant ............................................................................................. 14 4.9 Reasons for Discharge of Contaminant ............................................................................ 14 4.10 Migration of Contaminant ................................................................................................ 14 4.11 Climatic or Meteorological Influences on Migration ....................................................... 14 4.12 Soil Vapour Intrusion into Buildings ................................................................................ 14 4.13 Relevant Construction Features of Buildings ................................................................... 15 4.14 Building HVAC ................................................................................................................ 15 4.15 Subsurface Structures and Utilities ................................................................................... 15
5.0 POTENTIAL EXPOSURE PATHWAYS AND RECEPTORS .................................................... 16 5.1 Description of All Components ........................................................................................ 16 5.2 Receptor Human Health .................................................................................................... 17 5.3 Receptor Terrestrial Environment ..................................................................................... 18 5.4 Receptor Aquatic Environment ......................................................................................... 18 5.5 Summary of Potential Receptor Risks .............................................................................. 18
Updated Phase Two Conceptual Site Model July 6, 2015 Part 25 of Lot 15, Plan 66R-24227, City of Toronto, Ontario 13-14-4022
Terraprobe Page No iii
FIGURES: Figure 1 – Site Location Plan Figure 2 – APEC Areas Figure 3 – Borehole Location Plan Figure 4 – Ground Water Elevations Figure 5 – Cross Section Locations Figure 6 – Cross Section A-A’ Figure 7 – Cross Section B-B’ Figure 8 – Remediation Cross-Section Figure 9 – Pathways and Receptors APPENDICES: Appendix A – Borehole Logs
Updated Phase Two Conceptual Site Model July 6, 2015 Part 25 of Lot 15, Plan 66R-24227, City of Toronto, Ontario 13-14-4022
Terraprobe Page No 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The following document presents the Updated Phase Two Conceptual Site Model for the property
identified as Part 25 Plan 66R-24227, City of Toronto, Ontario, hereinafter referred to as “the Property”
or “Property”. The Phase Two Conceptual Site Model is part of the report titled “Updated Phase Two
Environmental Site Assessment, Part 25, Plan 66R-24227 City of Toronto, Ontario” prepared by
Terraprobe Inc. for Bridgepoint Health c/o PCL Constructors Canada Inc.
1.1 Property Description
The Property is irregular in shape and covers an area of approximately 0.248 hectares (2,480 m2). The
Property was occupied by open space/parkland with two small institutional-use structures present. The
general location of the Property is presented on Figure 1.
The Property information is as follows:
Legal Description Block 7 on Plan 66M-2468, designated as Part 25 on Plan 66R-24227, City of Toronto
PIN(s) 21068-0103 (LT)
Assessment Roll Number 1904-075-110-00103
Municipal Address 558 Gerrard Street East, Toronto, Ontario
Zoning The property is currently zoned R4-Z1.0 as per City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-06
Area 0.248 hectares
.
Updated Phase Two Conceptual Site Model July 6, 2015 Part 25 of Lot 15, Plan 66R-24227, City of Toronto, Ontario 13-14-4022
Terraprobe Page No 2
1.2 Summary of Previous Investigations
Previous investigations for the Property were provided to Terraprobe for review. The reports are
summarized below:
Report Title Phase I Environmental Site Assessment; Bridgepoint Lands, Toronto Report Date December, 2008 Prepared By Golder Associates Prepared For Bridgepoint Health
The Phase I ESA report covered the current Phase Two Property (Part 25) as well as the surrounding
Bridgepoint Lands. A summary of the report is provided below.
The Phase One Property was partially developed at the time of the 2008 investigation. Part 25 was occupied by two small buildings occupied by medical offices/charities associated with the Bridgepoint Health Hospital. The other parcels of land included in the investigation were occupied by the Bridgepoint Health building, the Old Don Jail, and the New Don Jail.
No fuel storage tanks, waste disposal sites, or other similar items of potential environmental concern were identified directly on Part 25. A possible UST (vent pipes) was noted at the east side of the Don Jail building, about 50 m north of the current Phase One Property.
Golder Associates noted that other subsurface investigations had been conducted at the Property by Pinchin Environmental Limited. The results of those older investigations indicated that fill was present at Part 25. Samples of the fill were reported to contain elevated levels of arsenic, barium, lead and zinc, but no exceedances of the applicable MOE limits were found at that time. No other evidence of potential environmental impact (i.e. staining, odours, etc.) to the soil was noted.
Various fuel spill occurrences were recorded by the MOE at the Old Don Jail Building (550 Gerrard Street East; just north of the Phase One Property).
A number of properties surrounding the Bridgepoint/Don Jail lands were occupied by tenants which included dry cleaning operations, garages, gasoline service stations, and machine shops.
A Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was recommended.
Report Title Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Land Parcel P1 to P4, Bridgepoint Health/ Don Jail Site, Toronto, Ontario
Report Date April, 2008 Prepared By Golder Associates Prepared For Bridgepoint Health
In this report, Part 25 was designated as “Parcel 4A”. The other Parcels (P1 to P3) studied are now designated as Parts 6, 9, 19, 21 and 27 on the current survey plan for the Bridgepoint lands.
Fourteen (14) exploratory boreholes were drilled across the entire study area, with four monitoring wells installed upon completion of drilling. Three boreholes were drilled directly in Part 25. One ground water monitoring well was installed in Part 25.
At every borehole, a zone of earth fill was encountered (from 0.2 m to 2.7 m below ground level). The fill was described as “sand to sandy silt, trace clay, occasional gravel, traces of brick’. No odours or staining were identified in the soil samples obtained during drilling.
Native sandy silt soil was encountered beneath the fill. Bedrock was not encountered during drilling. Ground water was not observed in the boreholes during drilling.
Updated Phase Two Conceptual Site Model July 6, 2015 Part 25 of Lot 15, Plan 66R-24227, City of Toronto, Ontario 13-14-4022
Terraprobe Page No 3
Soil samples were analysed for metals, VOCs, and PAHs. The report indicated that all parameters tested were below the MOE Standards at that time. It is noted that all of the soil samples also meet the current (2011) MOE Table 3 Standards.
Groundwater samples were obtained from the monitoring wells installed in each Part. The report indicated no groundwater exceedances were encountered for the parameters (VOCs, metals and PAHs) for which samples were analysed. It is noted that the ground water sample results also meet the current (2011) MOE Table 3 Standards.
The ground water flow direction was determined to be from the northeast to the southwest.
A Phase One Environmental Site Assessment was recently completed for the Phase Two Property by
Terraprobe. The Phase One ESA included this Phase Two Property plus two other land parcels at the
Bridgepoint Health site. The Phase One ESA findings are presented in a report entitled “Phase One
Environmental Site Assessment, Parts 25, 26 and 27, Plan 66R-24227, Part of Lot 15, Concession 1 FTB,
City of Toronto, Ontario”, issued March 24, 2014 (Updated February 19, 2015).
The Phase One ESA identified the following PCAs which could affect the Phase Two and RSC Property:
Phase One Property
Number Location Potentially
Contaminating Activity
Details Media Potentially Impacted
1 On Site All Parts
#30 – Importation of Fill Material of Unknown Quality
Previous investigation identified fill soils at the Property, with elevated levels of arsenic, barium, lead and zinc in the fill soil.
Soil
Phase One Study Area 2 Part 19,
Bridgepoint Lands 50 m north
Others – Ontario Spills
A spill of unknown quantity of varsol to ground on October 22, 1999. Soil contamination was anticipated.
Soil and ground water
3 Part 19, Bridgepoint Lands 50 m north
Others – O. Reg. 347 Waste Generators
Waste generation occurred from 1989 to 2013 for: aliphatic solvents, light and heavy fuels, pharmaceuticals, pathological wastes, detergent/soaps, paint, pigment and coating at the site.
Soil and ground water
4 Part 7, Bridgepoint Lands 90 m north
#28 – Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks
Former USTs were located adjacent to the south of Parcel A prior to 2014. An oily sheen was observed on the ground water sample taken from the site.
Soil and ground water
8 Part 19 Bridgepoint Lands 50 m north
#28 – Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks
A possible UST (ex. vent and fill pipes were visible) was noted at the west side of the New Don Jail building in 2008 during a previous site investigation.
Soil and ground water
9 573 Gerrard St. East 20 m south
#28 – Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks
The site was formerly occupied by a gasoline station with three USTs on site in 1935.
Soil and ground water
Updated Phase Two Conceptual Site Model July 6, 2015 Part 25 of Lot 15, Plan 66R-24227, City of Toronto, Ontario 13-14-4022
Terraprobe Page No 4
10 573 Gerrard St. East 20 m south
#52 – Storage, maintenance, fuelling and repair of equipment, vehicles, and material used to maintain transportation systems
The site was formerly occupied by various automotive service stations from 1930 to 1970.
Soil and ground water
11 547 Gerrard St. East 15 m southwest
#28 – Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks
The site was formerly occupied by a gasoline station with three USTs on site from 1929 to 1951.
Soil and ground water
12 #52 – Storage, maintenance, fuelling and repair of equipment, vehicles, and material used to maintain transportation systems
Addition of a repair and greasing area appeared to be on site in 1951.
Soil and ground water
13 #37 – Operation of Dry Cleaning Equipment (where chemical are used)
Two former dry cleaning facilities occupied on site from 1940 to 1980.
Soil and ground water
14 229 Hamilton St. 65 m south
#10 – Commercial Autobody Shops
The site was formerly occupied by an auto painting building and a garage in 1935.
Soil and ground water
15 559/563 Gerrard St. East 10 m south
#28 – Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks
The site was formerly occupied by a gasoline station with three USTs from 1923 to1951.
Soil and ground water
16 #52 – Storage, maintenance, fuelling and repair of equipment, vehicles, and material used to maintain transportation systems
A former service station occupied the site in 1930.
Soil and ground water
17 239 Hamilton St. 35 m south
#52 – Storage, maintenance, fuelling and repair of equipment, vehicles, and material used to maintain transportation systems
A former truck garage occupied the site in 1951.
Soil and ground water
18 #50 – Soap and Detergent Manufacturing, Processing and Bulk Storage
A former soap manufacturer occupied the site in 1951.
Soil and ground water
29 368 Broadview Ave. 25 m south
#52 – Storage, maintenance, fuelling and repair of equipment, vehicles, and material used to maintain transportation systems
Various automotive service stations occupied on site from 1930 to 1970.
Soil and ground water
Updated Phase Two Conceptual Site Model July 6, 2015 Part 25 of Lot 15, Plan 66R-24227, City of Toronto, Ontario 13-14-4022
Terraprobe Page No 5
36 571 Gerrard St. East 20 m south
#28 – Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks
A former gasoline station with a garage and a gasoline tank occupied the site from 1932 to 1934.
Soil and ground water
38 5 Simpson Ave. 60 m northeast
#28 – Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks
Private owner was approved for a license to operate a gasoline tank in 1926.
Soil and ground water
47 14 St. Matthews Rd. 100 m north
#28 – Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks
A 36,706 L commercial fuel oil storage tank for heating was registered on site in 1993.
Soil and ground water
The PCA locations are provided on Figure 1.
During the completion of previous subsurface investigations at the site by Golder Associates, the ground
water flow direction was determined to be from the northeast towards the southwest. For this reason, the
PCAs which were located downgradient (south) of Part 25 (PCAs 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 29
and 36) were not carried forward as APECs.
The Phase One ESA identified the following Areas of Potential Environmental Concern (APEC) on the
Phase Two Property:
APEC 1 is a result of the fuel storage tanks, historical waste generators and historical spill which were located to the north and northeast of the Phase One Property. The APEC includes PCAs 2 to 4, PCA 8, PCA 38, and PCA 47, and includes the entire Phase One Property. The Contaminants of Concern (CoCs) for this APEC are PHCs, VOCs and BTEX. The media potentially impacted are soil and ground water.
APEC 2 is a result of the fill materials (PCA 1) located on the Property based on previous investigations. The APEC includes the entire Property. The Contaminants of Concern (CoCs) are metals, select inorganics and PAHs. The media potentially impacted are soil and ground water.
Based on the findings of the Phase One ESA, a Phase Two ESA was recommended.
Updated Phase Two Conceptual Site Model July 6, 2015 Part 25 of Lot 15, Plan 66R-24227, City of Toronto, Ontario 13-14-4022
Terraprobe Page No 6
2.0 INFORMATION FROM THE PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
2.1 Areas Where Potentially Contaminating Activity has occurred
The Phase One Environmental Site Assessment identified the following Potentially Contaminating
Activities (PCAs) on the Phase Two Property and within the Study Area:
PCA Number Location Potentially Contaminating Activity Details PCAs 2 to 4, PCA 8, PCA 38, and PCA 47
Off Site
#28 – Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks
Other – Ontario Spills
Other – O. Reg. 347 Waste Generators
Records indicate that fuel storage tanks, historical waste generators, and a historical spill were located to the north & northeast of the Property.
PCA1 On Site #30 – Importation of Fill Material of Unknown Quality
Previous investigation identified fill soils at the Property, with elevated levels of arsenic, barium, lead and zinc in the fill soil.
The locations of the PCAs are shown on Figure 1.
2.2 Areas of Potential Environmental Concern
Based on the results of the Phase One ESA, the following areas of potential environmental concern
(APEC) resulting from the potentially contaminating activities were identified by at the Phase Two
Property:
APEC Location of Potential Environmental Concern on Phase Two Property
Potentially Contaminating Activity
Location of PCA
Contaminants of Potential Concern
Media Potentially Impacted (Groundwater, Soil and/or Sediment)
1 On Entire Property #28 – Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks
Other – Ontario Spills
Other - O. Reg. 347 Waste Generators
Off site PHCs, VOCs, BTEX Soil and Groundwater
2 On Entire Property #30 – Importation of Fill Material of Unknown Quality
Onsite Metals, As, Sb, Se, Cr (VI), Hg, B-HWS, high pH, CN-, low pH, PAHs
Soil and Groundwater
The Phase One ESA recommended that a Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment should be
completed to investigate the Areas of Potential Environmental Concern
The location of the APECs are shown on the attached Figure 2.
Updated Phase Two Conceptual Site Model July 6, 2015 Part 25 of Lot 15, Plan 66R-24227, City of Toronto, Ontario 13-14-4022
Terraprobe Page No 7
2.3 Subsurface Structures and Utilities
Underground utilities are not present on the Property, but they are located along Jack Layton Way to the
north. Based upon this, it is possible that any potentially contaminated ground water could migrate
horizontally along the utilities onto or off the Property.
The site is covered by earth and grass. As such, infiltration of storm water from the ground surface would
occur when a precipitation event occurs. This could cause the downward migration of possible
contaminates.
Updated Phase Two Conceptual Site Model July 6, 2015 Part 25 of Lot 15, Plan 66R-24227, City of Toronto, Ontario 13-14-4022
Terraprobe Page No 8
3.0 PHYSICAL SETTING OF THE PHASE TWO PROPERTY
3.1 Site Stratigraphy
Pavement Structure
The ground surface of the Phase Two Property was covered with grass and topsoil.
Earth Fill
All of the boreholes encountered a surficial layer of earth fill, which had a thickness of 0.3 to 1.5 metres.
The fill consisted of silty sand or sandy silt with some gravel. No visual or olfactory evidence of potential
environmental impact to the fill was noted.
Native Soil
A layer of native soils consisting of silt, trace sand extending to the maximum depth of investigation (5.2
mbgs) was encountered at all borehole locations. Refer to enclosed borehole logs for stratigraphy details.
Bedrock
Bedrock was not encountered during this investigation.
3.2 Approximate Depth to Water Table
Ground water elevations are presented on the following table. Based upon the ground water elevations,
there appears to be one aquifer present on the property. The aquifer is an unconfined aquifer in the native
soil. The ground water flow direction in the aquifer is relatively flat and flowing in a northerly direction.
Ground water elevations are presented on Figure 4.
MW Well
Depth (m)
Ground Surface
Elevation (masl)
13-June-14
WL (mbgl)
Elevation (masl)
MW1 5.2 100.46 3.50 96.96
MW2 5.2 99.78 3.04 96.74
MW3 5.2 99.94 3.15 96.79
Based on the above measurements, the ground water flow direction at the Phase Two Property appears to
be directed towards the south.
Updated Phase Two Conceptual Site Model July 6, 2015 Part 25 of Lot 15, Plan 66R-24227, City of Toronto, Ontario 13-14-4022
Terraprobe Page No 9
3.3 Site Hydrogeological Characteristics
According to Freeze and Cherry (1979), the typical hydraulic conductivity of the strata investigated at the
Property are:
Earth Fill (Silty Sand) 10-4 m/s to 10-6 m/s
Native Soil (Silt, trace sand) 10-7 m/s to 10-9 m/s
Bedrock (Georgian Bay Formation) 10-4 m/s to 10-8 m/s
The horizontal hydraulic gradient is calculated using the following equation:
i = Δh/Δs
Where,
i = horizontal hydraulic gradient;
Δh (m) = ground water elevation difference; and,
Δs (m) = separation distance.
Based on the available information, horizontal hydraulic gradient of shallow ground water flow is
estimated at 0.02 in a southerly direction.
It is noted that vertical hydraulic gradients were not evaluated for the Property as a second water bearing
unit was not encountered at the depths investigated at the Property.
Contaminants of Potential Concern were not present at concentrations above the applicable site condition
standards in the aquifer investigated.
3.4 Approximate Depth to Bedrock
The depth to bedrock was inferred from Ontario Geological Survey mapping completed in the area. The
mapping indicated that the bedrock is of the Georgian Bay Formation, and should be encountered at an
elevation of about 70 masl.
3.5 Section 41 or 43.1
Section 41 of the regulation (Environmentally Sensitive Areas) does not apply to the Phase Two Property.
Section 43.1 of the regulation (shallow soil property or water body) does not apply to the Property.
3.6 Soils Placed On, In or Under the Phase Two Property
No soils have been imported or placed on, in or under the Phase Two Property since the Phase One ESA
was completed in 2014.
Updated Phase Two Conceptual Site Model July 6, 2015 Part 25 of Lot 15, Plan 66R-24227, City of Toronto, Ontario 13-14-4022
Terraprobe Page No 10
3.7 Proposed Buildings
The site will be redeveloped as a public park for the City of Toronto. No new buildings are to be
constructed.
Updated Phase Two Conceptual Site Model July 6, 2015 Part 25 of Lot 15, Plan 66R-24227, City of Toronto, Ontario 13-14-4022
Terraprobe Page No 11
4.0 CONTAMINATION IN OR UNDER THE PHASE TWO PROPERTY
4.1 Applicable Site Condition Standard
The applicable soil and ground water Standards for the Property were determined to be those in Table 3 of
the April 15, 2011 Ontario Ministry of Environment (MOE) “Soil, Ground Water and Sediment
Standards for use under part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act” for
Residential/Institutional/Parkland property use in a non-potable ground water condition for coarse
textured soil (Table 3 RPI Standards).
These are considered to be the applicable Standards for the following reasons:
The Property is to be conveyed to the City of Toronto for redevelopment as a public park.
Soil at the Property was assumed to be coarse-textured for the purposes of this work.
The Property is not within 30 m of a surface water body, or adjacent to any natural areas.
Bedrock across the Property is found at depths of greater than 2 m.
The Property is located in an area of the City of Toronto that is serviced by municipal piped water. The City of Toronto derives its potable water from Lake Ontario.
The soil pH was between 6-9 for surficial soils, and between 5-11 for subsurface soils.
4.2 Media Investigated
Based upon the Potentially Contaminating Activities (PCAs) identified in the Phase One ESA for the
Property, it was decided that investigation was required for:
Soil
Ground water
The following soil samples were submitted for chemical analysis:
Sample Depth
Soil Type Chemical Analysis
(mbgl) Metals PAHs VOC PHC
BH1 SA1A 0.3 Fill X X
BH2 SA1A 0.2 Fill X X
BH3 SA1B 1.0 Native X X DUP 1(BH3
SA1B) 1.0 Fill X X
BH1 SA4B 5.0 Native X X
BH2 SA3 3.6 Native X X
BH3 SA4 4.8 Native X X DUP 2 (BH2
SA3) 3.6 Native X X
Updated Phase Two Conceptual Site Model July 6, 2015 Part 25 of Lot 15, Plan 66R-24227, City of Toronto, Ontario 13-14-4022
Terraprobe Page No 12
The following ground water samples were submitted for chemical analysis:
Sample Chemical Analysis
VOCs PAHs M&I PHC
MW1 X X X X
MW2 X X X X
MW3 X X X X
DUP (MW3) X X X X
TRIP BLANK X
4.3 Sampling Rational
APEC-1 Off-site: Properties occupied by fuel storage tanks, etc.
The Contaminants of Potential Concern associated with APEC-1 include petroleum hydrocarbons
(PHC + BTEX) and VOCs.
Boreholes MW1, MW2 and MW3 were placed within this APEC area to confirm soil quality.
Ground water samples were collected from Monitoring Wells MW1, MW2 and MW3
APEC-2 On-Site: Imported Fill Soils Located Across Property.
The Contaminants of Potential Concern associated with APEC-1 include Metals & Inorganics and
PAHs.
Boreholes MW1, MW2 and MW3 were placed within this APEC area to confirm soil quality.
Ground water samples from Monitoring Wells MW1, MW2 and MW3 were collected to confirm ground
water quality.
4.4 Areas Where Contaminants are Present
The Phase Two ESA used the Table 3 RPI Standards for the soil and ground water as found in the “Soil,
Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act”
(April 2011).
APEC-1 Off-site: Properties occupied by fuel storage tanks, etc.
Soil samples from Boreholes 1, 2 and 3 found no exceedances of the MOE Table 3 Standards for
the Contaminants of Potential Concern (PHC + BTEX and VOCs).
No exceedances were found in the ground water samples collected from Monitoring Wells MW1,
MW2 and MW3.
Updated Phase Two Conceptual Site Model July 6, 2015 Part 25 of Lot 15, Plan 66R-24227, City of Toronto, Ontario 13-14-4022
Terraprobe Page No 13
It is concluded based on the soil and ground water sampling that there are no Contaminants of Potential
Concern present about the Table 3 Standards in this APEC.
APEC-2 On-Site: Imported Fill Soils Located Across Property.
The fill soil sample from BH1 found one exceedance of the MOE Table 3 Standards for lead. No
exceedances of the Table 3 Standards were found in the other fill soil samples from the site.
No exceedances of the MOE Table 3 Standards were found in the native soil or the ground water.
After the above-noted exceedance was found, approximately 4.5 cubic meters of fill soil was
excavated and removed from the Property in the vicinity of the exceedance. Confirmatory soil
samples were obtained after the soil was removed and were submitted for laboratory analysis. No
exceedances of the MOE Table 3 Standards were found in the confirmatory samples.
It is concluded based upon the soil sampling conducted as part of the current investigation that (after the
soil removal activities) there are now no Contaminants of Potential Concern above the MOE Table 3
Standards at this APEC location, but formerly one contaminant was present (lead).
4.5 Contaminants Associated with Each Area
The Phase Two ESA used the Table 3 RPI Standards for the soil and ground water as found in the “Soil,
Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act”
(April 2011).
Contaminants of Concern were not identified in the ground water above the applicable criteria during the
investigation.
No Contaminants of Potential Concern were identified in the native soil above the applicable Site
Condition Standards.
One contaminant (lead) was identified in the fill soil at APEC #2 during the Phase Two ESA
investigation. The fill soil at that location extended to a maximum depth of 0.3 m below the existing
ground surface. The fill soil at the exceedance location was excavated and removed. Confirmation soil
samples were obtained after the soil was removed and were submitted for laboratory analysis. No
exceedances of the MOE Standards were found in the confirmatory samples.
4.6 Medium in Which Contaminants are Associated
Earth fill, native soils and ground water were investigated as part of the Phase Two ESA. No
Contaminants of Concern were identified above the applicable Site Condition Standards in the native soil
or the ground water during the investigation.
Updated Phase Two Conceptual Site Model July 6, 2015 Part 25 of Lot 15, Plan 66R-24227, City of Toronto, Ontario 13-14-4022
Terraprobe Page No 14
One contaminant was found in the near-surface fill soils. The fill soils were therefore a medium with
which contaminants were associated. The fill soil with the exceedance was subsequently removed from
the Property.
4.7 Information Known about Each Contaminated Area
One Contaminant of Potential Concern was identified in the fill soil at APEC #2, specifically at the
location of Borehole #1. The fill was likely placed at the Property during site development activities. The
fill soil was removed and subsequent soil sampling confirmed that the contaminants are no longer present.
No Contaminants of Potential Concern were identified in the native soil or the ground water in this
APEC.
No other contaminated areas were identified on the Property.
4.8 Distribution of Contaminant
The lead exceedance was found in the fill soil at Borehole #1, at a depth of about 0.3 mbgl. At Borehole
1, the fill soil extended to a depth of about 0.3 m. During remediation, the soil at this location was
excavated to a depth of about 0.5 m and removed from the Property.
4.9 Reasons for Discharge of Contaminant
The contaminant that was found at the Property was identified in the fill which was likely associated
with historical site development activities.
4.10 Migration of Contaminant
It is not expected that the identified contaminant (lead) would migrate.
4.11 Climatic or Meteorological Influences on Migration
The Property was covered by a soft cap (grass). Climatic or meteorological influence on migration of
potential contamination on the Property could occur. Since no Contaminants of Potential Concern are
currently present in the soil and ground water, there is no possibility of future migration of contaminants.
4.12 Soil Vapour Intrusion into Buildings
No Contaminants of Potential Concern were identified in the soil and ground water upon completion of
the investigation, with the exception of the previously identified metals exceedance in the fill soil. Metal
parameters are not contaminants which migrate by soil vapour intrusion. As such there is no possibility
for soil vapour intrusion of contaminants into future buildings.
Updated Phase Two Conceptual Site Model July 6, 2015 Part 25 of Lot 15, Plan 66R-24227, City of Toronto, Ontario 13-14-4022
Terraprobe Page No 15
4.13 Relevant Construction Features of Buildings
No volatile Contaminants of Concern have been identified on the Property. Therefore, it is not expected
that building construction features would affect the distribution and transport of Contaminants of
Concern.
4.14 Building HVAC
No volatile Contaminants of Concern have been identified on the Property. Therefore, it is not expected
that any building HVAC systems would affect the distribution and transport of Contaminants of Concern.
4.15 Subsurface Structures and Utilities
Underground utilities are not present on the Property, but are located in the roadway located directly to
the north. Based upon this, it is possible that any potentially contaminated ground water could migrate
horizontally along the utilities onto or off the Property.
Updated Phase Two Conceptual Site Model July 6, 2015 Part 25 of Lot 15, Plan 66R-24227, City of Toronto, Ontario 13-14-4022
Terraprobe Page No 16
5.0 POTENTIAL EXPOSURE PATHWAYS AND RECEPTORS
5.1 Description of All Components
Following is the list of all risk based components of the potential exposure pathways and receptors. These
components are used in this section as well as the graphical representation of the pathways and receptors
presented on Figure 8.
Please note Figure 8 is a graphical representation of potential pathways and receptors and does not have a
scale or orientation which can be related to the Phase Two Property.
GW1 – Ground water for drinking water purposes
GW2 – Ground water for protection from movement to indoor air
GW3 – Ground water for protection of aquatic life
S1 – Soil for protection of a residential receptor from direct contact with surface soil
S2 – Soil for protection from direct soil contact for a lower frequency and intensity exposure than
residential surface soil, such as commercial or industrial scenarios
S3 – Soil for direct soil contact for a low-frequency, high-intensity, human health exposure scenario
without children present that is protective of a worker digging in the soil
S-IA – Soil for protection of movement to indoor air and human exposure
S-OA – Soil for protection of movement to outdoor air and human exposure
S-Odour – Soil for protection of excessive odours
S-GW1 – Soil for protection from movement to ground water for drinking water purposes
S-GW3 – Soil for protection from movement to ground water and then to aquatic life
Plants and Soil Organisms – Soil for protection against adverse effects to plants and soil dwelling
organisms
Mammals and Birds – Soil for protection against adverse effects through direct soil and food ingestion to
mammals and birds
Updated Phase Two Conceptual Site Model July 6, 2015 Part 25 of Lot 15, Plan 66R-24227, City of Toronto, Ontario 13-14-4022
Terraprobe Page No 17
5.2 Receptor Human Health
Potential Pathway
Potential Risks Sources Contaminant of Concern from Phase One ESA
Potential Risks
GW1 Contamination not present in groundwater Metals, ORPs, VOCs,
PAHs, PHCs, PCB
No Risk – No Source
GW2 Contamination not present in groundwater Metals, ORPs, VOCs,
PAHs, PHCs
No Risk – No Source
S1 Contamination not present in fill material
Contamination not present in native soil Metals, ORPs, VOCs,
PAHs, PHCs
No Risk – No Source
S2 Contamination not present in fill material
Contamination not present in native soil Metals, ORPs, VOCs,
PAHs, PHCs
No Risk – No Source
S3 Contamination not present in fill material
Contamination not present in native soil Metals, ORPs, VOCs,
PAHs, PHCs
No Risk – No Source
S-IA Contamination not present in fill material
Contamination not present in native soil VOCs, PHCs No Risk – No Source
S-OA Contamination not present in fill material
Contamination not present in native soil VOCs, PHCs No Risk – No Source
S-Odour Contamination not present in fill material
Contamination not present in native soil
VOCs, PHCs No Risk – No Source
S-GW1 Contamination not present in groundwater Metals, ORPs, VOCs, PAHs, PHCs
No Risk – No Source
Updated Phase Two Conceptual Site Model July 6, 2015 Part 25 of Lot 15, Plan 66R-24227, City of Toronto, Ontario 13-14-4022
Terraprobe Page No 18
5.3 Receptor Terrestrial Environment
Potential Pathway
Potential Risks Sources Contaminant of Concern from Phase One ESA
Potential Risks
Plants and Soil Organisms
Contamination not present in fill material
Contamination not present in native soil
Metals, ORPs, VOCs, PAHs, PHCs
No Risk – No Source
Mammals and Birds
Contamination not present in fill material
Contamination not present in native soil
Metals, ORPs, VOCs, PAHs, PHCs
No Risk – No Source
5.4 Receptor Aquatic Environment
Potential Pathway
Potential Risks Sources Contaminant of Concern from Phase One ESA
Potential Risks
GW3 Contamination not present in groundwater Metals, ORPs, VOCs, PAHs, PHCs, PCB
No Risk – No Source
S-GW3 Contamination not present in groundwater Metals, ORPs, VOCs, PAHs, PHCs
No Risk – No Source
5.5 Summary of Potential Receptor Risks
One of the potential Contaminants of Concern identified in the Phase One ESA was identified on the
Property above the applicable full depth Generic Site Condition Standards (lead), but has since been
removed.
No other Potential Contaminants of Concern from the Phase One ESA were found at the Property.
Therefore it is concluded that there are no potential risks associated with the Property in relation to the
Human Receptor, the Terrestrial Environment or the Aquatic Environment.
FIGURES
TERRAPROBE INC.
APEC 1
APEC 2
0 510 15
20m
SCALE
SITE
FIGURE NO.:
FILE NO.:0
2
APEC AREAS
As Shown
SITE LOCATION:
KEY MAP
NOTES:
FIGURE TITLE:
REV NO.:
DATE:FIGURE NO.:
FILE NO.:
SCALE:
PROJECT TITLE:
REFERENCE:
LEGEND:
Consulting Geotechnical & Environmental Engineering
Construction Materials, Inspection & Testing
Terraprobe Inc.
Phase Two Property Boundary
13-14-4022-2
Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment
December 2014
Bridgepoint Property Part 25Toronto, Ontario
APEC 1 - #28 - Gasoline & Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks
APEC 2 - #4 - Importation of Fill Material of Unknown Quality
APEC - Area of Potential Environmental Concern
MW1
MW2
MW3
0 510 15
20m
SCALE
SITE
FIGURE NO.:
FILE NO.:0
3
BOREHOLE / MONITORING WELLLOCATION PLAN
As Shown
SITE LOCATION:
KEY MAP
NOTES:
FIGURE TITLE:
REV NO.:
DATE:FIGURE NO.:
FILE NO.:
SCALE:
PROJECT TITLE:
REFERENCE:
LEGEND:
Consulting Geotechnical & Environmental Engineering
Construction Materials, Inspection & Testing
Terraprobe Inc.
Phase Two Property Boundary
13-14-4022-2
Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment
December 2014
Bridgepoint Property Part 25Toronto, Ontario
Approximate Borehole/Monitoring Well Location
Z:\1-P
ro
ject Files\13-En
v\2014\13-14-4022\A
. D
wg
s, Lo
gs\A
uto
CA
D\13-14-4022-2 FIG
S (P
art 25).d
wg
, SK
MW1
MW2
MW3
96.96
96.79
96.74
97.00
9
6
.7
5
9
6
.5
0
0 510 15
20m
SCALE
SITE
FIGURE NO.:
FILE NO.:0
4
GROUND WATER ELEVATIONS
As Shown
SITE LOCATION:
KEY MAP
NOTES:
FIGURE TITLE:
REV NO.:
DATE:FIGURE NO.:
FILE NO.:
SCALE:
PROJECT TITLE:
REFERENCE:
LEGEND:
Consulting Geotechnical & Environmental Engineering
Construction Materials, Inspection & Testing
Terraprobe Inc.
Phase Two Property Boundary
13-14-4022-2
Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment
December 2014
Bridgepoint Property Part 25Toronto, Ontario
Approximate Borehole/Monitoring Well Location
96.96
97.00
Ground Water Elevation (mbgs)
Ground Water Contour Line
Z:\1-P
ro
ject Files\13-En
v\2014\13-14-4022\A
. D
wg
s, Lo
gs\A
uto
CA
D\13-14-4022-2 FIG
S (P
art 25).d
wg
, SK
MW1
MW2
MW3
0 510 15
20m
SCALE
SITE
FIGURE NO.:
FILE NO.:0
5
CROSS SECTION LOCATIONS
As Shown
SITE LOCATION:
KEY MAP
NOTES:
FIGURE TITLE:
REV NO.:
DATE:FIGURE NO.:
FILE NO.:
SCALE:
PROJECT TITLE:
REFERENCE:
LEGEND:
Consulting Geotechnical & Environmental Engineering
Construction Materials, Inspection & Testing
Terraprobe Inc.
Phase Two Property Boundary
13-14-4022-2
Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment
December 2014
Bridgepoint Property Part 25Toronto, Ontario
Approximate Borehole/Monitoring Well Location
Cross Section Location
A
B
A
'
B
'
Z:\1-P
ro
ject Files\13-En
v\2014\13-14-4022\A
. D
wg
s, Lo
gs\A
uto
CA
D\13-14-4022-2 FIG
S (P
art 25).d
wg
, SK
SITE
FILL
FILL
FILL
FILL
FILL
SILT
SILT
SILT
SILT
SILT
0
Distance Along Cross Section A-A' Baseline (m)
Elevation (m
)
MW
1
MW
2
Ground Surface
Northwest Southeast
FIGURE NO.:
FILE NO.:0
613-14-4022-2
CROSS SECTION A-A'
Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment
As Shown
December 2014
SITE LOCATION:
KEY MAP
NOTES:
FIGURE TITLE:
REV NO.:
DATE:FIGURE NO.:
FILE NO.:
SCALE:
PROJECT TITLE:
REFERENCE:
LEGEND:
Consulting Geotechnical & Environmental Engineering
Construction Materials, Inspection & Testing
Terraprobe Inc.
Ground Water Level (mbgs), June 13, 2014
Bridgepoint Property Part 25Toronto, Ontario
Fill
Silt
CROSS SECTION A-A'
Z:\1-P
ro
ject Files\13-En
v\2014\13-14-4022\A
. D
wg
s, Lo
gs\A
uto
CA
D\13-14-4022-2 FIG
S (P
art 25).d
wg
, SK
SITE
SILT
SILT
SILT
SILT
SILT
SILT
FILL
FILL
FILL
Distance Along Cross Section B-B' Baseline (m)
MW
2
MW
3
Ground Surface
Southwest Northeast
Elevation (m
)
FIGURE NO.:
FILE NO.:0
713-14-4022-2
CROSS SECTION B-B'
Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment
As Shown
December 2014
SITE LOCATION:
KEY MAP
NOTES:
FIGURE TITLE:
REV NO.:
DATE:FIGURE NO.:
FILE NO.:
SCALE:
PROJECT TITLE:
REFERENCE:
LEGEND:
Consulting Geotechnical & Environmental Engineering
Construction Materials, Inspection & Testing
Terraprobe Inc.
Ground Water Level (mbgs), June 13, 2014
Bridgepoint Property Part 25Toronto, Ontario
Fill
Silt
CROSS SECTION B-B'
Z:\1-P
ro
ject Files\13-En
v\2014\13-14-4022\A
. D
wg
s, Lo
gs\A
uto
CA
D\13-14-4022-2 FIG
S (P
art 25).d
wg
, SK
APPENDIX A
TERRAPROBE INC.
DP
DP
DP
DP
DP
DP
1A
1B
2
3
4A
4B
FILL, silty sand, trace brick fragments,trace cinders, loose, brown, moist
SILT, trace sand, compact, brown,moist
SILT, some sand, dense, brown, moist
END OF BOREHOLE
Unstabilized water level measured at 3.4m below ground surface; borehole wasopen upon completion of drilling.
WATER LEVEL READINGSDate Water Depth (m) Elevation (m)
Jun 13, 2014 3.5 97.0
99.90.6
95.94.6
95.35.2
0ppm
0ppm
15ppm
10ppm
20ppm
DP1A Analysis:M&I, PAH
DP4A Analysis:VOC, PHC
LiquidLimit
Uns
tabi
lized
Wat
er L
evel
Typ
e
Dep
th S
cale
(m
)
0
1
2
3
4
5
Unconfined Pocket Penetrometer
Field Vane Lab VaneN
umbe
r
Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
40 80 120 160
SOIL PROFILE
GROUND SURFACE
SAMPLES
PlasticLimit
Dynamic ConeNatural
Water Content
100.5
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
Inst
rum
ent
Det
ails
Gra
phic
Log
Description
Ele
vatio
n S
cale
(m)
100
99
98
97
96
ElevDepth
(m)
SP
T 'N
' Val
ue
Moisture / Plasticity
10 20 30
PL LLMC Hea
dspa
ceV
apou
r
Lab Dataand
Comments
SAGR SI CL
Project No.:
Date started :
Sheet No. :
Position : E: 632718, N: 4836071 (UTM 17T)
13-14-4022-2
May 13, 2014
1 of 1
Client :
Project :
Location :
LOG OF BOREHOLE 1PCL Construction Canada Inc.
Bridgepoint Property Part 25
Toronto, Ontario
Elevation Datum : Local
Rig type : Geoprobe
lib
rary
: lib
rary
- t
erra
prob
e gi
nt.g
lb
rep
ort
: te
rrap
robe
soi
l log
fi
le:
13-1
4-40
22 b
h lo
gs.g
pjTerraprobe
Penetration Test Values(Blows / 0.3m)
10 20 30 40
DP
DP
DP
DP
1A
1B
2
3
FILL, silty sand, some gravel, compact,black to brown, moist
SILT, trace sand, compact, brown togrey, moist to wet
END OF BOREHOLE
Unstabilized water level measured at 2.9m below ground surface; borehole wasopen upon completion of drilling.
WATER LEVEL READINGSDate Water Depth (m) Elevation (m)
Jun 13, 2014 3.0 96.7
98.31.5
94.65.2
0ppm
0ppm
10ppm
35ppm
DP1A Analysis:M&I, PAH
DP3 Analysis:CCME(F1-F4), VOC
LiquidLimit
Uns
tabi
lized
Wat
er L
evel
Typ
e
Dep
th S
cale
(m
)
0
1
2
3
4
5
Unconfined Pocket Penetrometer
Field Vane Lab VaneN
umbe
r
Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
40 80 120 160
SOIL PROFILE
GROUND SURFACE
SAMPLES
PlasticLimit
Dynamic ConeNatural
Water Content
99.8
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
Inst
rum
ent
Det
ails
Gra
phic
Log
Description
Ele
vatio
n S
cale
(m)
99
98
97
96
95
ElevDepth
(m)
SP
T 'N
' Val
ue
Moisture / Plasticity
10 20 30
PL LLMC Hea
dspa
ceV
apou
r
Lab Dataand
Comments
SAGR SI CL
Project No.:
Date started :
Sheet No. :
Position : E: 632737, N: 4836058 (UTM 17T)
13-14-4022-2
May 13, 2014
1 of 1
Client :
Project :
Location :
LOG OF BOREHOLE 2PCL Construction Canada Inc.
Bridgepoint Property Part 25
Toronto, Ontario
Elevation Datum : Local
Rig type : Geoprobe
lib
rary
: lib
rary
- t
erra
prob
e gi
nt.g
lb
rep
ort
: te
rrap
robe
soi
l log
fi
le:
13-1
4-40
22 b
h lo
gs.g
pjTerraprobe
Penetration Test Values(Blows / 0.3m)
10 20 30 40
DP
DP
DP
DP
1A
1B
2
3
FILL, silty sand, trace rootlets, loose,dark brown, moist
SILT, some sand, compact, brown togrey, moist to wet
END OF BOREHOLE
Unstabilized water level measured at 2.7m below ground surface; borehole wasopen upon completion of drilling.
WATER LEVEL READINGSDate Water Depth (m) Elevation (m)
Jun 13, 2014 3.2 96.8
99.60.3
94.75.2
0ppm
0ppm
0ppm
10ppm
DP1B Analysis:M&I, PAH
DP3 Analysis:CCME(F1-F4)
LiquidLimit
Uns
tabi
lized
Wat
er L
evel
Typ
e
Dep
th S
cale
(m
)
0
1
2
3
4
5
Unconfined Pocket Penetrometer
Field Vane Lab VaneN
umbe
r
Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
40 80 120 160
SOIL PROFILE
GROUND SURFACE
SAMPLES
PlasticLimit
Dynamic ConeNatural
Water Content
99.9
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION (%)
(MIT)
Inst
rum
ent
Det
ails
Gra
phic
Log
Description
Ele
vatio
n S
cale
(m)
99
98
97
96
95
ElevDepth
(m)
SP
T 'N
' Val
ue
Moisture / Plasticity
10 20 30
PL LLMC Hea
dspa
ceV
apou
r
Lab Dataand
Comments
SAGR SI CL
Project No.:
Date started :
Sheet No. :
Position : E: 632735, N: 4836063 (UTM 17T)
13-14-4022-2
May 13, 2014
1 of 1
Client :
Project :
Location :
LOG OF BOREHOLE 3PCL Construction Canada Inc.
Bridgepoint Property Part 25
Toronto, Ontario
Elevation Datum : Local
Rig type : Geoprobe
lib
rary
: lib
rary
- t
erra
prob
e gi
nt.g
lb
rep
ort
: te
rrap
robe
soi
l log
fi
le:
13-1
4-40
22 b
h lo
gs.g
pjTerraprobe
Penetration Test Values(Blows / 0.3m)
10 20 30 40
top related