online monitoring practices for manganese control …€¦ · • raw water monitoring: manganese...

ONLINE MONITORING PRACTICES FOR MANGANESE CONTROL IN DRINKING WATER TREATMENT Vadim B. Malkov , Hach Company Water Systems Optimization, 10/30/2015

INTRODUCTION

• Manganese in US source water – why is it a problem?

• Reservoir inversion and its consequences • Case Studies

– Dissolved Oxygen (LDO®) • Soldier Canyon DWTP, Ft. Collins, CO • Sherard DWTP, Cheyenne, WY

– Control of manganese treatment with permanganate • Permanganate only • Mixed oxidants

• Conclusions and Recommendations

2

INTRODUCTION

3

– Manganese in US source water (WHO) • Surface water (>90%) –1 to 200 ppb (median = 16 ppb) • Ground water (~70%) – up to single ppm, median = 10 ppb

– Locations and concentrations/occurrences of manganese in water (USGS)

RESERVOIR INVERSION – WHAT IS NEXT?

• Seasonal changes in shallow reservoirs – Thermal stratification – Anaerobic conditions = dissolved iron and manganese (Mn2+) – Water “turnover”

• Consequences of the inversion – Aesthetic issues (staining) – Bad taste and odor

• Control the situation – Analysis for manganese – Other indicative parameters (e.g. pH/ORP, turbidity, DO)

• Chemical treatment

– Permanganate – Chlorine, etc.

4

LDO CASE STUDIES AT A GLANCE

Soldier Canyon DWTP, 50MGD • Source water

– Primary: Horsetooth Reservoir – Secondary: Cache La Poudre

River • Conventional treatment • Raw water monitoring:

manganese (lab), turbidity, pH/ORP, DO

• Pre-oxidation: chlorine dioxide feed after the intake (reactive approach)

• Post-disinfection: free chlorine

Sherard DWTP, 35 MGD • Source water

– Primary: Crystal Lake Reservoir – Secondary: Granit Springs

Reservoir (upstream) • Conventional treatment • Raw water monitoring:

manganese (lab), turbidity, pH/ORP, DO

• Pre-oxidation: oxygen feed at the bottom of reservoir (proactive approach)

• Post-disinfection: free chlorine

5

LDO CASE STUDY – SOLDIER CANYON

• DO sampling point – Horsetooth reservoir raw water – Poudre river raw water – Online DO analysis

• Manganese analysis - laboratory

6

SOLDIER CANYON – HISTORICAL LAB DATA

7

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

2/22/08 9/9/08 3/28/09 10/14/09 5/2/10 11/18/10 6/6/11 12/23/11 7/10/12 1/26/13 8/14/13 3/2/14 9/18/14 4/6/15

Mn

conc

, ppm

DO (p

pm) &

Tem

p, C

Temp, C

DO, ppm (Lab)

Mn, ppm

Some annual cyclical pattern can be seen

SOLDIER CANYON – LAB AND ONLINE DATA

8

Clear correlation between DO, water Temperature and Mn concentration

SOLDIER CANYON – DETAILED DATA ANALYSIS

9

Trigger point

Mn Event

SOLDIER CANYON – EVENT PREDICTION (TRIGGER POINT)

10

LDO CASE STUDY – SHERARD PLANT

Crystal Lake reservoir Plant Intake (Vault)

11

SHERARD – SOURCE WATER MONITORING

12

1 2 3 4 5

SHERARD – ONLINE MONITORING DATA ANALYSIS

13

Turnover event Trigger point

SENSOR MAINTENANCE Crystal Lake LDO preventive maintenance Inlet strainer (monthly filter wash) Monthly sensor wiping Monthly flow cell cleaning (brush)

14

Before cleaning, 9:54AM

After cleaning, 10:03 AM

MAIN TAKEAWAYS

Online DO and temperature monitoring of raw water (at the same sampling point) provides valuable results allowing to determine a trigger point before the reservoir water inversion.

The trigger point indicates the time frame (4-8 weeks) before elevated manganese levels appear in the treatment process, therefore allows for enough time to prepare for the event.

The closer monitoring point to the intake, the more accurate prediction.

If pre-oxidation is employed, the online monitoring of DO/Temperature allows for better treatment optimization (managing cost of pre-oxidants, i.e. chlorine dioxide, oxygen, permanganate).

15

TREATMENT FOR MANGANESE REMOVAL

16

US EPA - Secondary DW Regulations for iron and manganese

– Aesthetic, cosmetic, technical effects • Taste and Odor • Color • Corrosion and Scaling

– Secondary MCL • Iron: 0.3 ppm • Manganese: 0.05 ppm

– DW industry goals • Iron – 0.1 ppm • Manganese – 0.01 ppm

– Manganese removal and control • Oxidation with permanganate • Measure to maintain the balance • Use of process analysis

Manganese stains

Iron in water

MANGANESE REMOVAL PROCESS CONTROL – FIELD TEST

17

• Field test at Hummelstown DWTP (near Harrisburg, PA) – Surface water of variable quality – Pre-oxidation with permanganate (DBP reduction, manganese) followed by chlorine – Membrane filtration followed by post-chlorination

• Facility goals – Maintain balance for permanganate feed to avoid “pink water” and T&O issues – Need to discern free chlorine residual before filters to control post-chlorination

CL17 FOR MANGANESE REMOVAL CONTROL – TEST RESULTS

18 Correlation between KMnO4 dose and its residual, as well as for Total Dose and TRO

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Raw water intake monitoring for DO and temperature (at the same point) with process sensors provides early notification of elevated manganese levels and therefore allows for better treatment optimization.

Process of manganese removal with permanganate can be efficiently controlled and optimized with the use of simple and reliable process analyzer.

Application of full suite of online monitoring instrumentation (e.g. LDO and two CL17 analyzers sequentially measuring permanganate and TRO concentration) provides a good tool for control and optimization of challenging water treatment processes.

19

THANK YOU!

QUESTIONS?

Dr. Vadim Malkov, vmalkov@hach.com