national newspublishers survey 2011 measuring cross-platform reach of print & internet

Post on 27-Dec-2015

215 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

National Newspublishers Survey 2011

Measuring cross-platform reach of Print & Internet

Index

National Newspublishers Survey 2011

Measuring cross-platform reach of Print & Internet

TNS Belgium

Author(s)Jan DrijversOlivier Dequinnemaere

Belgian newspaper editors

Client contact Jan Drijvers

AC5403 | © TNS

1. Survey overview p. 3

2. Additional crossmedia reach p. 11

3. Leverage in readership offline + online p. 28

4. Profiles p. 35

5. Conclusions p. 44

National Newspublishers survey 2011

Survey overview

Objective of the survey

To study aspects of newspapers which are not (yet) covered by the CIM surveys

Commongoal

Individualperspectives

4

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Survey overview

Objectives – Common goal

To calculate the combined reach of newspapers, their magazines / supplements and internetsite(s).

To translate these reach figures into indices useful for cross-mediaplanning (accumulation, duplication, exclusive reach)

To maintain the structure of the universe and the reach figures from the CIM Print Survey for paper version of the dailies & magazines (reproduction of ‘CIM-fiche’)

5

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Survey overview

Objectives – Individual perspectives

To compare the image of the different media within the triple play (Corelio, Rossel)

To compare the reach of week- and weekend-editions (Concentra, Corelio, Mediafin, Persgroep)

To monitor the use of new digital platforms : Ipad, smartphone, digital TV (Corelio, Rossel)

6

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Survey overview

Datacollection method

CATI (telephone) – omnibus :

• Neutral method with regards to paper and internet • Exhaustiveness (no internet at home : +/- 40%) • Representativity : RDD fixed lines & mobile exclusives• Equal distribution of the sample over days of the week (//CIM)

7

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Survey overview

Sample

Universe 2010 :

• Belgian population 15+• Respondent receives questionnaire with appropriate titles according to language

Sample size :

• Goal : minimum 200 observations total reach for each newspaper• NL : 2503 interviews / FR : 2500 interviews

Weighing procedure :

• Weighing towards objectives CIM PMP 2010 on all important variables of a CIM-fiche: gender, age, social class, province, habitat, profession, education, family size, presence of children (‘Calage’ + ‘Calibrage’)

8

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Survey overview

QuestionnaireReach indicators

Total reach : • print : ‘read, seen, leafed through, last months ‘ (formulation CIM)• websites : ‘consulted last months’

Recency question (LLP/LDP) :• Open recency-question for all media : Last time : yesterday / 2 day ago / 3 days ago /

last 7 days / last 14-15 days / last 30 days / longer ago ? • Definition of LLP / LDP depends on day of interview and last day of publication

Frequency question : • dailies & websites : 6-7 days / 7 , 5/7, 3-4/7, 1-2/7, <1/7 (adapted for free and financial

dailies)• Weekend editions and magazines : 4 weeks out of 4, 3 out of 4, 2 out of 4, 1 out of 4 ,

< ¼

9

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Survey overview

Output

All classic reach indices for paper versions of newspaper :• Net reach, gross contact, frequency distribution, accumulation

Aggregation of individual reach indices than allows to calculate for the entire universe or for specific target groups :

• The net reach of the combination of two or more titles/sites • The number of exclusive users of each of the titles/sites• The number of duplicate users between two or more titles / sites

10

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Survey overview

National Newspublishers survey 2011

Additional crossmedia reach

Segmentation of titles

Popular Quality Regional

Dutch titles

French titles

12

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Additional crossmedia reach

Additional reach of websites in addition to one day paper

French titlesDutch titles

Websites offer a substantial additional reach to the newspaper reach

*Index = 100

100 100

142127

171158

0

50

100

150

200

1 day paper* + 1 day site + 1 week site

13

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Additional crossmedia reach

Additional reach of websites in addition to one day paperDutch titles

Popular titlesAll titles Quality titles Regional titles

*Index = 100

Additional reach of websites is higher for Dutch quality titles

100 100 100 100

142129

164

122

171

149

207

141

0

50

100

150

200

1 day paper* + 1 day site + 1 week site

14

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Additional crossmedia reach

Additional reach of websites in addition to one day paperFrench titles

100 100 100 100

127 133 133114

158167

176

129

0

50

100

150

200

1 day paper* + 1 day site + 1 week site

Popular titlesAll titles Quality titles Regional titles

*Index = 100

Websites of French regional titles offer less additional reach compared to sites of both popular and quality titles

15

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Additional crossmedia reach

Added value of websites in numbers of contacts

(‘000)Paper

1xSite1x

Paper + Site

Dutch titles 3 600 1 697 5 297 (147)

French titles 2 082 626 2 708 (130)

*Index (Paper=100)

16

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Additional crossmedia reach

Added value of websites in numbers of contacts

(‘000)Paper

1xSite1x

Paper + Site

Dutch titles 3 600 1 697 5 297 (147)

Dutch popular titles 2 040 899 2 939 (144)

Dutch quality titles 680 487 1 168 (172)

Dutch regional titles 879 311 1 190 (135)

French titles 2 082 626 2 708 (130)

French popular titles 402 172 574 (143)

French quality titles 670 254 924 (138)

French regional titles 1 010 201 1 210 (120)

Websites offer a substantial additional number of contacts to the paper version

*Index (Paper=100)

17

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Additional crossmedia reach

Added value of websites in GRPDutch titles – GRPs among Dutch population

(‘000)Paper

1xSite1x

Paper + Site

Dutch titles 71 33 104

Dutch popular titles 40 18 58

Dutch quality titles 13 10 23

Dutch regional titles 17 6 23

18

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Additional crossmedia reach

Added value of websites in GRPFrench titles – GRPs among French population

(‘000)Paper

1xSite1x

Paper + Site

French titles 54 16 70

French popular titles 10 4 15

French quality titles 17 7 24

French regional titles 26 5 31

19

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Additional crossmedia reach

Combined weekreach (paper + magazine + site)

Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday

Site7x

Paper6x (5x*)

Magazine1x

*For De Tijd and L’Echo

20

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Additional crossmedia reach

Additional reach on paper weekreach

French titlesDutch titles

On average, magazines and websites offer an addtional reach of respectively 30% (Dutch titles) and 20% (French titles) to the paper weekreach

*Index = 100

100 100110 105

123 117132

121

0

50

100

150

1 week paper* + magazine (1) + site (7) Combined weekreach

21

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Additional crossmedia reach

Additional reach on paper weekreach Dutch titles

100 100 100 100110 107

115104

123118

133

115

132124

146

118

0

50

100

150

1 week paper* + magazine (1) + site (7) Combined weekreach

Popular titlesAll titles Quality titles Regional titles

*Index = 100

Combined weekreach is higher for Dutch quality titles ...

22

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Additional crossmedia reach

Additional reach on paper weekreach French titles

100 100 100 100105 104 108

102

117 117123

108

121 120130

110

0

50

100

150

1 week paper* + magazine (1) + site (7) Combined weekreach

Popular titlesAll titles Quality titles Regional titles

*Index = 100

... as well as for French quality titles

23

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Additional crossmedia reach

Additional reach on paper weekreachExclusive readers/visitors and duplicants

Dutch titles

Exclusive readers/visitors

44%

6%

16%

Duplicants

14%

12%

1%

7%

66%

34%

% on base: Combined Weekreach

24

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Additional crossmedia reach

Additional reach on paper weekreachExclusive readers/visitors and duplicants

Dutch titles French titles

Exclusive readers/visitors

44% 63%

6% 3%

16% 13%

Duplicants

14% 8%

12% 9%

1% 1%

7% 3%

Less duplication between media for French titles

66%

34%

79%

21%

% on base: Combined Weekreach

25

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Additional crossmedia reach

Additional reach on paper weekreachExclusive readers/visitors and duplicants

Alltitles

Popular titles

Quality titles

Regional titles

Exclusive readers/visitors

44% 48% 42% 45%

6% 5% 9% 2%

16% 14% 20% 12%

Duplicants

14% 14% 11% 19%

12% 12% 10% 14%

1% 1% 1% 1%

7% 6% 7% 7%

Dutch titles

% on base: Combined Weekreach

26

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Additional crossmedia reach

Additional reach on paper weekreachExclusive readers/visitors and duplicants

Alltitles

Popular titles

Quality titles

Regional titles

Exclusive readers/visitors

63% 63% 57% 71%

3% 2% 5% 1%

13% 14% 16% 7%

Duplicants

8% 6% 9% 9%

9% 12% 9% 9%

1% 1% 1% 0%

3% 2% 3% 3%

French titles

% on base: Combined Weekreach

27

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Additional crossmedia reach

National Newspublishers survey 2011

Leverage in readership offline + online

Leverage in readership offline + online

16

8

27

16

visit corresponding website on same day

visit corresponding website in same week

French titles

Dutch titles

% readers of an average paper edition of a title ...

A large proportion of print readers visit the website of their chosen title.

29

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Leverage in readership offline + online

Leverage in readership offline + onlineDutch titles

16

14

19

14

27

24

30

25

visit corresponding website on same day

visit corresponding website in same week

Popular titles

All titles

Quality titles

Regional titles

% readers of an average paper edition of a title ...

30

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Leverage in readership offline + online

Leverage in readership offline + onlineFrench titles

8

9

9

6

16

17

17

13

visit corresponding website on same day

visit corresponding website in same week

Popular titles

All titles

Quality titles

Regional titles

% readers of an average paper edition of a title ...

31

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Leverage in readership offline + online

Leverage in readership offline + online

63

54

31

25

read any paper on same day

read corresponding paper on same day

French titles

Dutch titles

% visitors of a site (on an average day) ...

Newspaper sites appeal to their existing print readership, but they also attract a new audience to the title

32

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Leverage in readership offline + online

Leverage in readership offline + onlineDutch titles

63

60

68

59

31

33

25

37

read any paper on same day

read corresponding paper on same day

Popular titles

All titles

Quality titles

Regional titles

% visitors of a site (on an average day) ...

33

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Leverage in readership offline + online

Leverage in readership offline + onlineFrench titles

54

53

54

54

25

22

22

31

read any paper on same day

read corresponding paper on same day

Popular titles

All titles

Quality titles

Regional titles

% visitors of a site (on an average day) ...

34

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Leverage in readership offline + online

National Newspublishers survey 2011

Profiles

Differences in profilesDutch titles

90

112

85

103 108

98

102 105

96

9986

Men Women 15-34 35-54 55+ Active Notactive

SC 1-2 SC 3-4 SC 5-6 SC 7-8

112

83

111 119

74

112

87

112127 125

67

Men Women 15-34 35-54 55+ Active Notactive

SC 1-2 SC 3-4 SC 5-6 SC 7-8

Website visitors versus paper readers

Magazine versus paper readers

IND 100 = PROFILE PAPER (DAY)

Dutch magazines attract a female and upscale public, whereas websites attract

more men as well as active visitors

36

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Profiles

Differences in profilesDutch popular titles

83

120

81

102112

94

107 99 107 98 97

Men Women 15-34 35-54 55+ Active Notactive

SC 1-2 SC 3-4 SC 5-6 SC 7-8

116

81

137120

57

127

70

140129

93

44

Men Women 15-34 35-54 55+ Active Notactive

SC 1-2 SC 3-4 SC 5-6 SC 7-8

Magazine versus paper readers

Website visitors versus paper readers

IND 100 = PROFILE PAPER (DAY)

37

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Profiles

Differences in profilesDutch quality titles

92

110

91

105 103 102

96

109

89 9574

Men Women 15-34 35-54 55+ Active Notactive

SC 1-2 SC 3-4 SC 5-6 SC 7-8

121

6883

125

86

104

9785

125

164

90

Men Women 15-34 35-54 55+ Active Notactive

SC 1-2 SC 3-4 SC 5-6 SC 7-8

Magazine versus paper readers

Website visitors versus paper readers

IND 100 = PROFILE PAPER (DAY)

38

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Profiles

Differences in profilesDutch regional titles

93

108

91

105 103

96

104 105

95

10794

Men Women 15-34 35-54 55+ Active Notactive

SC 1-2 SC 3-4 SC 5-6 SC 7-8

93

108

83

125

86

109

91

125 129

97

56

Men Women 15-34 35-54 55+ Active Notactive

SC 1-2 SC 3-4 SC 5-6 SC 7-8

Magazine versus paper readers

Website visitors versus paper readers

IND 100 = PROFILE PAPER (DAY)

39

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Profiles

Differences in profilesFrench titles

92

112

83

101117

95

105 111 105

95

94

Men Women 15-34 35-54 55+ Active Notactive

SC 1-2 SC 3-4 SC 5-6 SC 7-8

122

72

103118

80

119

82

149

115

4963

Men Women 15-34 35-54 55+ Active Notactive

SC 1-2 SC 3-4 SC 5-6 SC 7-8

Magazine versus paper readers

Website visitors versus paper readers

Both French magazines and websites attract a more upscale public.

IND 100 = PROFILE PAPER (DAY)

40

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Profiles

Differences in profilesFrench popular titles

75

151

94 89

126

100 100

91 93 88

135

Men Women 15-34 35-54 55+ Active Notactive

SC 1-2 SC 3-4 SC 5-6 SC 7-8

98

105 113 108

67

126

69

185

100

5060

Men Women 15-34 35-54 55+ Active Notactive

SC 1-2 SC 3-4 SC 5-6 SC 7-8

Magazine versus paper readers

Website visitors versus paper readers

IND 100 = PROFILE PAPER (DAY)

41

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Profiles

Differences in profilesFrench quality titles

94

105

80

100123

93

108 102115

10283

Men Women 15-34 35-54 55+ Active Notactive

SC 1-2 SC 3-4 SC 5-6 SC 7-8

131

58

91

119

95

120

83

126106

4064

Men Women 15-34 35-54 55+ Active Notactive

SC 1-2 SC 3-4 SC 5-6 SC 7-8

Magazine versus paper readers

Website visitors versus paper readers

IND 100 = PROFILE PAPER (DAY)

42

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Profiles

Differences in profilesFrench regional titles

95

104

81

109 106

95

105

135

96 89

90

Men Women 15-34 35-54 55+ Active Notactive

SC 1-2 SC 3-4 SC 5-6 SC 7-8

121

75

109123

70

119

82

165

136

62 64

Men Women 15-34 35-54 55+ Active Notactive

SC 1-2 SC 3-4 SC 5-6 SC 7-8

Website visitors versus paper readers

Magazine versus paper readers

IND 100 = PROFILE PAPER (DAY)

43

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Profiles

National Newspublishers survey 2011

Conclusions

Conclusions

The increasing reach of websites provides additional reach, rather than cannibalisation. Complementarity works. The different platforms (print + online) are mutually reinforcing.

3 out of 10 who visit an online newspaper, read the same newspaper that day, 6 out of 10 any given newspaper.

The incremental reach of online is higher in the North and for quality titles.

While building on a solid foundation of newspaper readers, newspaper websites are attracting a younger, more affluent and more active consumer, while their magazines attract a more female readership.

45

National Newspublishers survey 2011 > Conclusions

Thanks

top related