national board of accreditation...1 dr. batta nagaraju agopb1996j phd 21.09.2001 professor...
Post on 24-Jul-2020
2 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
Compliance Report Format
(Tier – II)
Part – A: Institutional Information
(To be filled only once for all programs under consideration)
A1. Name and Address of the college:- Anil Neerukonda Institute of Technology & Sciences
City: Sangivalasa, Bheemunipatnam, Visakhapatnam
State: Andhra Pradesh, Pin Code:- 531163
Phone: 07330789892, 09866237517
Landline: 08933-225083/84
Fax: 08933-226395
Website: www.anits.edu.in
Email: principal@anits.edu.in
A2. Year of Establishment: 2001
A3. First Approval Letter No.: F.No:730-50-098(NDEG)/ET/2001 Dated 05-09-2001
A4. Head of the Institution:-
Name: Prof. T. Subrahmanyam
Designation: Principal
Nature of Appt.: Permanent
Phone No: 08933-225085
Mobile: 07330789892, 09866237517
Email: principal@anits.edu.in, tsmanyam@anits.edu.in
Fax No: 08933-226395
A5. Name and Address of the Affiliation University:
Name: Andhra University
City: Visakhapatnam
State: Andhra Pradesh
Pin: 530003
Website: https://andhrauniversity@edu.in
email: enquiry@andhrauniversity.edu.in
registrar@andhrauniversity.edu.in
Phone No.: 0891-2844555
Fax No: 0891-2755324
A6. Type of the Institution:-
Institute of National Importance Autonomous
University * Any other (Please specify)
Deemed University
A7. Ownership Status:
Central Government Trust
State Government Society
Government Aided Section 25 Company
Self –financing * Any other (Please specify)
A8. Students Admissions (Institute level considering all UG programs)
Item CAY
2018-19
CAY m1
2017-18
CAY m2
2016-17 Total
Sanctioned intake 1080 1080 1020 3180
Number of students admitted (corresponding to sanctioned intake)
954 1022 950 2926
% of students Admitted over last three assessment years (Total admitted /Sanctioned Intake) = 92.01
A9. Details of the Students actually admitted through Lateral Entry / Separate Division
Item CAY CAYm1 CAYm2 Number of students admitted through Lateral Entry
199 210 202
Number of students admitted through Separate Division
--- --- ---
Total Number of students admitted in the second year
199 210 202
Note: Provide student details of the second shift (if applicable)
A10. Provide separate Information for each of the program(s) for which compliance is to be submitted
Name of the Department
Name of the program being offered
Name of the program to be considered
Year of start
Intake
Increase in intake, if any
Year of increase
AICTE Approval (Initial – Final years)
Accreditation Status*
Computer
Science and
Engineering
UG –
CSE
PG - CST
UG –
CSE
2001 60 120
180
2008
2015
2001-02 to
2018-19
Granted
provisional
accreditation
for three
years
From June,
2016-
June, 2019
Information
Technology
UG - IT UG – IT 2001 60 120
180
2015
2017
2001-02 to
2018-19
Electronics and
Communication
Engineering
UG –
ECE
PG - CS
UG –
ECE
2001 60 120
180
2005
2014
2001-02 to
2018-19
Electrical and
Electronics
Engineering
UG –
EEE
PG - CS
UG - EEE 2001 60 120
180
2009
2014
2001-02 to
2018-19
Mechanical
Engineering
UG – ME
PG - MD
UG - ME 2005 60 120
180
240
2009
2014
2015
2005-06 to
2018-19
PART B- Program Information
B1. Name of the Program : Mechanical Engineering
B2. Faculty Information and Contributions
List of faculty members
S.No
. Name PAN No.
Qualificatio
n
Date of
Joining
Designatio
n
Date on
which
Designated
as
Professor/
Associate
Professor
Curren
tly
Associa
ted
(Y/N)
Date of
Leaving(In case
Currently
Associated is “No”)
1 Dr. Batta Nagaraju AGOPB1996J PhD 21.09.2001 Professor 01.11.2014 Y
2 Dr. Thota Hanumantha Rao ABYPT2277K PhD 24.10.2005 Professor 01.08.2008 Y
3 Dr. Nimmakayala Indrakiran AHNPN9165B PhD 12.06.2007 Professor 01.11.2014 Y
4 Dr. Kondapalli Siva Prasad AKFPP4795A PhD 04.06.2008 Professor 01.06.2018 Y
5 Dr. Rajesh Ghosh AKDPG3047J PhD 10.08.2015 Assoc.Prof 10.08.2015 Y
6 Mr. Rajaraman Chandramouli AGYPR7270D M.Tech 01.06.2011 Assoc.Prof 01.06.2011 Y
7 Dr. Marampudi Raja Roy ASSPM6502D PhD 18.10.2005 Assoc.Prof 22.01.2019 Y
8 Mr. G Umamaheswara Rao AENPG5783P
M.Tech 21.06.2007
Sr. Asst.
Prof Y
9 Mr. M.S. S.Srinivasa Rao ABVPM1947Q
M.Tech 03.12.2012 Sr. Asst. Prof Y
10 Dr. Aditya Kolakoti BJSPK5718H PhD 01.06.2018 Asst. Prof Y
11 Mrs. Pakalapati Ramya BLGPP1724A M.Tech 12.08.2009 Asst. Prof Y
12 Mr. Konda Naresh Kumar CGXPK4590C M.Tech 04.06.2010 Asst. Prof Y
13 Mr. Katakam Satyanarayana AXQPS1517F M.Tech 08.06.2011 Asst. Prof Y
14
Mr. Mallipudi Prasanth
Kumar BHCPM1615D
M.Tech 10.06.2011
Asst. Prof Y
15 Mr. D S S Sai Ravi Kiran BAXPD1997F M.Tech 20.06.2011 Asst. Prof Y
16 Mr. Simhadri Phani Kumar DCGPS5414F M.Tech 08.08.2012 Asst. Prof Y
17
Ms. Modem Amereswari
Reddy ARYPM0948E
M.Tech 11.06.2012
Asst. Prof Y
18 Mr. Dokku Srinivasa Rao ANCPD2911L M.Tech 12.09.2012 Asst. Prof Y
19 Mr. B Balaji Ashok Kumar BQOPB3535Q M.Tech 13.07.2012 Asst. Prof Y
20 Mrs. M N V Krishnaveni ATRPM2741A M.Tech 13.09.2012 Asst. Prof Y
21 Ms. Kasarapu V. Rukmini AZJPK0075B M.Tech 15.06.2012 Asst. Prof Y
22 Mr. Manda Chandra Sekhar AHUPM5395F M.Tech 20.07.2012 Asst. Prof Y
23 Mrs. Manepalli Sailaja BAMPM8155K M.Tech 06.06.2013 Asst. Prof Y
24 Mr. M. Prem Dheeraj BLHPM2064H M.Tech 01.08.2014 Asst. Prof Y
25 Mr. J V Bhanu Tej ARNPJ8868M M.Tech 02.06.2014 Asst. Prof Y
26 Mr. V. Ravi Teja Behara AWCPB0437C M.Tech 02.06.2014 Asst. Prof Y
27 Mr. P. Chandra Sekhar ATAPP0420A M.Tech 04.06.2014 Asst. Prof Y
28 Mr. B.Pradeep Kumar AVRPB0184G M.Tech 09.06.2014 Asst. Prof Y
29 Mr. R.D.V.Prasad BDNPR2634E M.Tech 10.07.2014 Asst. Prof Y
30 Mr. B. Geeta Chandra Sekhar BOOPB3263H M.Tech 02.06.2015 Asst. Prof Y
31 Mr. Naresh Gurajarapu AYAPG8919J M.Tech 03.06.2015 Asst. Prof Y
32 Mr. Basa Nagaraju AYUPB3107F M.Tech 06.07.2015 Asst. Prof Y
33 Mrs. Bala Divya Potnuru BRYPP2514C M.Tech 28.12.2015 Asst. Prof Y
34 Ms. K.S. Lalitha Soujanya CVCPS7202M M.Tech 01.01.2016 Asst. Prof Y
35 Mr. Pantala Srinivasa Rao CIVPP1335A M.Tech 01.06.2016 Asst. Prof Y
36 Mr.M.Ramakrishna AZGPR5473H M.Tech 01.06.2016 Asst. Prof Y
37 Ms.K.Sree Sruthi ELYPS7192L M.Tech 01.06.2016 Asst. Prof Y
38 Ms.Y.Rawali AFLPY0575N M.Tech 01.06.2016 Asst. Prof Y
39 Mrs. V. Bindu Neeharika AHRPL5636M M.Tech 14.06.2016 Asst. Prof Y
40
Mr. A.P.S.V.R.
Subrahmanyam AYFPA3502Q
M.Tech 01.06.2017
Asst. Prof Y
41 Mr. B. Roop Sandeep BNBPB9418A M.Tech 01.06.2017 Asst. Prof Y
42 Mr. Ch. Maheswara Rao ALKPC3583H M.Tech 01.06.2017 Asst. Prof Y
43 Mr. R. Vara Prasad BDKPR7946C M.Tech 01.06.2017 Asst. Prof Y
44 Mr. Siva V N B Gupta Peruri BPNPP3321J M.Tech 01.06.2017 Asst. Prof Y
45 Mrs. B. Krishna Prafulla BFBPB6393G M.Tech 01.06.2017 Asst. Prof Y
46 Mr. G. Babji BGPPG3389E M.Tech 05.06.2017 Asst. Prof Y
47 Mr. K. Gowri Sankar BYFPK7656C M.Tech 05.06.2017 Asst. Prof Y
48 Mr. J. Mahesh AZKPJ0629F M.Tech 10.06.2017 Asst. Prof Y
49
Mr. Pathakamsetty Srinivasa
Rao BCYPP4404Q
M.Tech 01.06.2018
Asst. Prof Y
50 Mr. Ronanki Suresh CIIPR8709R M.Tech 01.06.2018 Asst. Prof Y
51 Mr. S. Ramanjaneyulu FXLPS0076M M.Tech 01.06.2018 Asst. Prof Y
52 Mr. S. Srikanth CKDPS4932A M.Tech 05.06.2017 Asst. Prof N 30.11.2018
53 Mrs. Naidana Indraja AOIPN1253N M.Tech 01.08.2012 Asst. Prof
N 30.04.2018
54 Mr. Dumpla Simhachalam BAWPD8585Q M.Tech 04.06.2012 Asst. Prof N 29.04.2017
55 Mr. V.V.Narayana Reddy ANVPV4303P M.Tech 09.06.2014 Asst. Prof N 12.12.2018
56
Mr. V.Sarat Chandra
Varma AIGPV9477Q
M.Tech 16.06.2016 Asst. Prof N
04.12.2017
B.2.1. Student Faculty Ratio (No of Faculty as per the sanctioned intake):-
(To be calculated at Department Level) No. of UG Programs in the Department (n): 1
No. of PG Programs in the Department (m):1
No. of Students in UG 2nd
Year= u1
No. of Students in UG 3rd
Year= u2
No. of Students in UG 4th
Year= u3
No. of Students in PG 1st
Year= p1
No. of Students in PG 2nd
Year= p2
No. of Students = Sanctioned Intake + applicable lateral entry, if any (The above data to be provided considering all the UG and PG programs of the department) S=Number of
Students in the Department = UG1 + UG2 +UG3 + PG1 + PG2 F = Total Number of Faculty Members in the Department (excluding first year faculty)
Student Faculty Ratio (SFR) = S / F
Year CAY CAYm1 CAYm2
u1.1 288 288 288
u1.2 288 288 216
u1.3 288 216 144
UG1 864 792 648
p1.1 18 18 18
p1.2 18 18 18
PG1 36 36 36
Total No. of Students in the
Department (S) 900 828 684
No. of Faculty in the
Department (F) 49 47 35
Student Faculty Ratio (SFR) SFR1=18.37 SFR2= 17.62 SFR3= 19.54
Average SFR SFR=(18.37+17.62+19.54)/3 = 18.5
B2.2. Faculty Details of the Department (UG+PG):
CAYm1 CAY 2017-18 2018-19
S.no. Designation
With PhD. Without With PhD. Without
Regular
Contractual
PhD. Regular
Contractual
PhD.
a. Professors 2 0 0 4 0 0
b. Associate Professors 2 0 1 2 0 1
c. Assistant Professors 0 0 45 1 0 45
Total number of
4
46
46
Faculty in the
d. Department 0 7 0
(UG+PG)
B2.3. Faculty Cadre Proportion
The reference Faculty cadre proportion is 1(F1):2(F2):6(F3)
F1: Number of Professors required = 1/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with 20:1 Student-Faculty ratio based
on no. of students (N) as per B2.1
F2: Number of Associate Professors required = 2/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with
20:1 Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per B2.1
F3: Number of Assistant Professors required = 6/9 x Number of Faculty required to comply with
20:1 Student-Faculty ratio based on no. of students (N) as per B2.1
Year Professors Associate Professors Assistant Professors
Required F1 Available Required F2 Available Required F3 Available
CAY 5 4 10 3 30 46
CAYm1 4 2 9 3 28 45
CAYm2 3 2 8 3 23 33
Average RF1=4 AF1=3 RF2=9 AF2=3 RF3=27 AF3=42
Numbers
B2.4. Faculty as participants in Faculty development/training activities/STTPs
Name of the faculty Details of the participation (Faculty developmet/ training activities/
STTPs)
CAYm1(2017-18) CAYm2(2016-17) CAYm3 (2015-16)
J.V.Bhanu Tej 2 1 4
K satyanarayana 2 1 6
P.Bala Divya 2 1
A P S V R
Subramanyam 3 1
Basa Naga Raju 3 1
D.Srinivasa Rao 1 1
V.V.Narayana Reddy 1 1 1
P.Srinivasa Rao 1 1
Ch.Maheswara Rao 2 1
M.Sailaja 2 1 5
Y.Rawali 1 1
K.S.L.Soujanya 1 1
R.Chandra Mouli 1 1 1
B.G.Chandra Sekhar 1 2 2
B.V.Ravi Teja 1 1 4
J.Mahesh 1 1
M.Raja Roy 1 1 1
K.Gowrisankar 1 1
Dr.K.Siva Prasad 1 7
M.Prem Dheeraj 2 2 5
Mr.B.B. Ashok Kumar 1 2 1
P.Chandrashekar 1 1 2
B.Pradeep Kumar 1 1 2
R.D.V.Prasad 1 1 3
G.Naresh 1 1 2
Dr T.V.Hanumantha
Rao 1 1 3
S.Phani Kumar 1 1 1
M.Prasanth Kumar 1 1 1
K.Naresh Kumar 1 1 1
K.Naresh Kumar 1 1 1
M.N.V.Krishna Veni 1 1 1
K.V.Rukmini 1 1 1
M.S.Srinivasa 1 1 1
B.Krishna Prafulla 1
R vara Prasad 1 .
B2.5. Research and Development
S.No. Name of the Faculty
Academic Research
Number of quality publications in
refereed/SCI Journals, citations,
Books/Book Chapters etc.
Ph.D. guided /Ph.D. awarded during
the assessment period while
working in the institute
As provided in
SAR (15-16,14-
15,13-14)
After Evaluation
(18-19, 17-
18,16-17)
As provided in
SAR After evaluation(till
the date of
compliance report)
1 Dr. Batta Nagaraju 6 4
2 Dr. Thota Hanumantha Rao 2 2
3 Dr. Nimmakayala Indrakiran 1
4 Dr. Kondapalli Siva Prasad 34 15 1
5 Dr. T. Subrahmanyam
6 Dr. D. Prasada Rao
7 Dr. Rajesh Ghosh 1
8 Mr. Rajaraman Chandramouli 2
9 Dr. Marampudi Raja Roy 1 2 1
10 Mr. Gadapu Umamaheswara Rao 2
11 Mr. M.S. S.Srinivasa Rao 1
12 Dr. Aditya Kolakoti 3
13 Mrs. Pakalapati Ramya 2 2
14 Mr. Konda Naresh Kumar 1 3
15 Mr. Katakam Satyanarayana 9 3
16 Mr. Mallipudi Prasanth Kumar 3 4
17 Mr. Dwibhashyam Satya Sai Ravi
Kiran 1
18 Mr. Simhadri Phani Kumar 3 1
19 Ms. Modem Amereswari Reddy 1 1
20 Mr. Dokku Srinivasa Rao 1
21 Mr. Bylapudi Balaji Ashok Kumar 1
22 Mrs. Munukurthi N V Krishnaveni 2 1
23 Ms. Kasarapu V. Rukmini 1
24 Mr. Manda Chandra Sekhar 2 2
25 Mrs. Manepalli Sailaja 4 3
26 Mr. M. Prem Dheeraj 2
27 Mr. Jakkampudi V Bhanu Tej 1
28 Mr. V. Ravi Teja Behara
29 Mr. P. Chandra Sekhar 1 1
30 Mr. B.Pradeep Kumar 2 2
31 Mr. R.D.V.Prasad 2 1
32 Mr. B. Geeta Chandra Sekhar 1
33 Mr. Naresh Gurajarapu 1 1
34 Mr. Basa Nagaraju 1
35 Mrs. Bala Divya Potnuru 1
36 Ms. K.S. Lalitha Soujanya
37 Mr. Pantala Srinivasa Rao 1
38 Mr.M.Ramakrishna 1
39 Ms.K.Sree Sruthi
40 Ms.Y.Rawali
41 Mrs. V. Bindu Neeharika 1
42 Mr. A.P.S.V.R. Subrahmanyam 2
43 Mr. B. Roop Sandeep 1
44 Mr. Ch. Maheswara Rao 21
45 Mr. R. Vara Prasad 2
46 Mr. Siva V N B Gupta Peruri 1
47 Mrs. B. Krishna Prafulla 3
48 Mr. G. Babji 2
49 Mr. K. Gowri Sankar
50 Mr. J. Mahesh 1
51 Mr. Pathakamsetty Srinivasa Rao
52 Mr. Ronanki Suresh
53 Mr. S. Ramanjaneyulu 1
54 Mr. S. Srikanth 1
55 Mrs. Naidana Indraja
56 Mr. Dumpla Simhachalam
(Relieved) 1
57 Mr. V.V.Narayana Reddy 2
58 Mr. V.Sarat Chandra Varma
59 S.Kakati 1
60 V.Krishna 3
Total 88 99 1 1
B2.6. Sponsored Research/Consultancy
(B) Details as provided in the SAR previously
Name of Project Project Type Funding Amount Duration
the faculty Title
Research/Consultanc
y Agency
Dr. K Siva
Prasad
“Investigation on Pitting
corrosion rate of pulsed
current micro plasma arc
welded austenitic steels”
Research UGC Rs
4,60,000/- 2 years
(II) Details after evaluation (till the date of Compliance Report)
Name of Project Project Type Funding Amount Duration
the faculty Title Research/Consultancy Agency
Projects applied to various funding agencies and results are awaited. Details are provided in
appendix –I , B-IV
B.3. Students’ Performance
Student Intake Table
Item CAY
Batch :
2018
CAYm
1
Batch :
2017
CAYm
2
Batch :
2016
CAYm
3
Batch :
2015
(Information to be provided cumulatively for all the shifts with explicit
headings, wherever applicable)
Sanctioned intake of the program (N) 240 240 240 240
Total number of students admitted in first year minus number of students
migrated to other programs/institutions, plus no. of students migrated to this
program (N1)
207 223 211 237
Number of students admitted in 2nd year in the same batch via lateral entry
(N2) 55 78 45
Separate division students, if applicable (N3) - - - -
Total number of students admitted in the Program (N1 + N2 + N3) 207 278 289 282
Academic Performance Table
Year of entry
N1 + N2 + N3
(As defined above)
Number of students who have successfully
graduated
I Year II Year III Year IV Year
CAY 2018 207
CAYm1 2017 278 165
CAYm2 2016 289 128 161
CAYm3 2015 282 177 210 205
CAYm4 (LYG) 2014 204 134 116 114 111
CAYm5 (LYGm1) 2013 144 103 102 102 98
CAYm6 (LYGm2) 2012 143 92 105 102 102
B3.1. Success rate without backlog in stipulated period
SI= (Number of students who graduated from the program without backlog in the stipulated period of course duration)/ (Number of
students admitted in the first year of that batch and admitted in 2nd
year via lateral entry and separate division, if applicable)
Item Latest Year
of
Graduation,
LYG
Batch : 2014-
2018
Latest
Year of
Graduatio
n minus 1,
LYGm1
Batch :
2013-2017
Latest
Year of
Graduatio
n minus 2,
LYGm2
Batch :
2012-2016
Number of students admitted in the corresponding First Year + admitted in 2nd
year via lateral entry and separate division, if applicable 204 144 143
Number of students who have graduated without backlogs in the stipulated
period 57 71 47
Success Index (SI) 0.28 0.49 0.33
Average Success Index 0.37
B3.2. Success rate with backlog in stipulated period of study
SI= (Number of students who graduated from the program with backlog in the stipulated period of course duration)/ (Number of
students admitted in the first year of that batch and admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry and separate division, if applicable)
Item
Latest Year
of
Graduation,
LYG
Batch : 2014-
2018
Latest
Year of
Graduatio
n minus 1,
LYGm1
Batch :
2013-2017
Latest
Year of
Graduatio
n minus 2,
LYGm2
Batch :
2012-2016
Number of students admitted in the corresponding First Year + admitted in 2nd
year via lateral entry and separate division, if applicable 204 144 143
Number of students who have graduated with backlogs in the stipulated period 111 98 102
Success Index (SI) 0.54 0.68 0.71
Average Success Index 0.64
B3.3. First Year Academic Performance
Academic Performance = ((Mean of 1st
Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10 point scale) or
(Mean of the percentage of marks in First Year of all successful students/10)) x (number of successful students/number
of students appeared in the examination)
Successful students are those who are permitted to proceed to the second year.
Academic Performance CAYm1
Batch : 2017
CAYm2
2016
CAYm3
2015
Mean of CGPA or Mean Percentage of all successful students
(X) 7.81 7.88 7.94
Total no. of successful students (Y) 165 128 177
Total no. of students appeared in the examination (Z) 235 204 235
API = x* (Y/Z) 5.48 4.94 5.98
Average API = (AP1 + AP2 + AP3)/3 5.47
B3.4. Academic Performance in Second Year
API = ((Mean of 2nd
Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10 point scale) or (Mean of the
percentage of marks of all successful students in Second Year/10)) x (number of successful students/number of students
appeared in the examination) Successful students are those who are permitted to proceed to the Third year.
Academic Performance CAYm1
Batch :
2016
CAYm2
2015
CAYm3
2014
Mean of CGPA or Mean Percentage of all successful students (X) 7.85 7.85 7.28
Total no. of successful students (Y) 161 210 116
Total no. of students appeared in the examination (Z) 273 285 200
API = x* (Y/Z) 4.63 5.78 4.22
Average API = (AP1 + AP2 + AP3)/3 4.88
B3.5. Academic Performance in Third Year
API = ((Mean of 3rd
Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10 point scale) or (Mean of the percentage of marks of all
successful students in Third Year/10)) x (number of successful students/number of students appeared in the examination) Successful students are those who are permitted to proceed to the final year.
Academic Performance CAYm1
Batch : 2015
CAYm2
2014
CAYm3
2013
Mean of CGPA or Mean Percentage of all successful students
(X) 7.83 7.34 7.57
Total no. of successful students (Y) 205 114 102
Total no. of students appeared in the examination (Z) 278 198 142
API = x* (Y/Z) 5.77 4.23 5.44
Average API = (AP1 + AP2 + AP3)/3 5.15
B3.6.Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship
Item CAYm1 CAYm2 CAYm3
2014-2018 2013-2017 2012-2016
Total No. of Final Year Students (N) 204 144 143
No. of students placed in companies or Government Sector (x) 50 41 60
No. of students admitted to higher studies with valid qualifying
scores (GATE or equivalent State or National Level Tests, GRE, 5 6 12
GMAT etc.) (y)
No. of students turned entrepreneur in engineering/technology (z) 0 1 1
x + y + z = 55 48 73
Placement Index : (x + y + z )/N 0.27 0.33 0.51
Average placement= (P1 + P2 + P3)/3 0.37
PART C. Criterion wise Compliance Status
S.No Criteria
Observations made by
NBA (During the last
accreditation visit)
Compliance Status (Action taken by
the institution)
1 Vision, Mission &
PEOs
1.1 Formulation Vision, Mission of the
institute and department
are available but mission
statement of the
department is not
appropriate.
The Mission statement was formulated
after obtaining inputs from all the
stakeholders in the meetings of Academic
Planning and Monitoring Cell and
moreover the statement also reflects the
mission of the institution. It was
approved by appropriate committees
which include stakeholders.
Industry not involved in
the process
The inputs from industry are considered
through meetings of Academic planning
and Monitoring cell and departmental
BOS in which representatives at
executive level of industry are involved.
1.2 Dissemination 1.Dissemination
inadequate.
2. Faculty and students are
not aware of the Vision,
Mission and PEOs.
1.The information is disseminated
through college website and through
display boards placed conspicuously in
every floor of the department. Further
this information is also percolated to the
students through academic regulations,
curriculum book given every annum.
2.Workshops/Lecture on OBE are being
organized every year for the faculty at the
institution and departmental levels.
3.The faculty in turn are educating the
students in their respective classes at the
start of every semester.
4.Student orientation programme is also
organized for first year students at the
start of the four year course work.
1.3 Assessment No comments -
1.4 Any other
observations of the
NBA
Matrix for mapping PEOs
with elements of mission
statement is prepared but
explanation inadequate.
It is revised and completely justified.
2 Course outcomes
and Programme
outcomes
2.1 Formulation COs defined for all courses
but are not appropriate.
COs have been thoroughly modified in
light of the comments of NBA. Bloom’s
taxonomy is adhered in formulating the
COs with the higher levels of learning.
2.2 Mapping Matrix developed but not
understood by most of the
A hands on session training programme
is organized for the faculty to educate on
faculty members. the intricacies of CO-PO mapping. The
mapping matrix is also revised with
complete justification.
2.3 Any other
observations of the
NBA
---- ------
3 Curriculum Design,
if applicable
3.1 Process to identify
the gap, if applicable
and action taken
thereof.
Gap identification process
not proper. In fact the
concept is not understood.
The institution has attained Autonomous
status in the year 2015. The curriculum is
designed by including courses / topics
that were existing as gaps in the previous
curriculum. To illustrate the above, a few
of the changes are cited.
a. A course on “Nano technology”
is introduced as open elective
b. “Finite Element Analysis” &
“Refrigeration and Air
conditioning” are introduced as
professional electives.
c. Moment of Inertia is included as
a topic in Engineering Mechanics
course.
d. Static force analysis is included
in Theory of machines-II course.
e. Simple applications of FEA
using Analysis software is
included in CAD-Lab.
3.2 Curriculum Structure
& Component (as
applicable)
No comments Curriculum structure & its components
are completely designed by us in view of
the Autonomous status.
3.3 Any other
observations of the
NBA
Efforts to include the gaps
in the curriculum are not
seen.
The institution was earlier affiliated to
Andhra University. The curriculum then
was completely designed by the
University. The institution did not have a
role to play in such circumstances. The
institution has since attained
Autonomous status in the year 2015. The
gaps identified earlier were taken care of
in the design of Autonomous curriculum.
A few of the changes introduced are
referred at 3.1 above.
4 Details of the Action taken on the Observation of NBA during last visit.
(Enclosed as Appendix I)
Appendix I
4. Details of the Action taken on the Observation of NBA during last visit
The department of Mechanical engineering has taken the deficiencies, weaknesses and
strengths pointed out by the NBA team into perspective. The following steps were initiated to rectify
the weaknesses/ deficiencies.
A. Weaknesses:
I. Student success rate is low
Weak students were identified in each subject and remedial classes are conducted
continually throughout the semester. Further, for the benefit of the students, the course
materials of all the pertinent subjects are uploaded online through Moodle software.
II. Laboratories have bare minimum equipment
The laboratories were earlier established as per AU curriculum. The curriculum has
been redesigned after obtaining autonomous status. Extra experiments were added wherever
necessary to enhance the quality of laboratory work. New labs over and above the curriculum
were also established which could be used for project works. The details are as mentioned
below:
SL.NO Lab Year of
procurement/establishment
Equipment procured Expenditure
1 Mechanical Engineering 2017 Separating and
Throttling calorimeter
Rs-78,000/-
2 Material testing Lab (New
lab) under MODROBS
2018 Computerised UTM (3
Tonnes capacity)
Rs-12,00,000/-
3 Advanced Engineering
Drawing Lab (New lab)
2017 50 computer systems Rs-20,00,000/-
4 CAD/CAM lab 2018 CATIA Software Rs-5,00,000/-
5 e-yantra robotics lab.(in
collaboration with IIT-
Bombay)
2018 Fire bird V-2560
Robots & its
accessories.
Rs-2,00,000/-
III. Most of the faculty members are with M.Tech qualification.
The faculty are being encouraged to register for PhD and the faulty who have already
registered are provided support to complete their doctorial programmes at the earliest.
Academic year No. of PhD holders No. of faculty
registered
No. of Faculty submitted
Thesis and awaiting result
2016-17 6 0 0
2017-18 6 4 1
2018-19 9 6 4
IV. There is no professional development plan (PDP) for faculty and support.
1. There is an adequate budgetary support every academic year for professional
development, wherein the faculty are encouraged to participate in seminars, conferences,
workshops at national and international level. An annual budget of Rs-1,25,000/- is
exclusively earmarked for this purpose. The budget allocated is supplemented through
sponsorships from other organizations. Academic leaves are sanctioned to the faculty
who attend such programmes.
2. The institution also allows faculty to pursue PhD through QIP. The faculty who opt for
such programmes are provided academic leaves/ special privilege leaves for completing
the preliminary course work with full salary and thereafter they are sanctioned leave for 3
complete years with half salary.
3. The faculty who are pursuing PhD on part-time basis in other institutions are also
provided academic leaves/ special privilege leaves for completing the preliminary course
work and also whenever it is needed.
V. Only few faculty members are involved in accreditation processes. Other faculty
members are not aware of the OBE.
The new entrants in faculty ranks are imparted training on OBE in the institution
level. This is further supplemented by training classes at the departmental level. The senior
faculty from the department are sponsored for workshops on OBE organized in other
institutions where resource persons are from premier institutions. These faculty in turn hold
similar training sessions for the remaining faculty of the department.
VI. Only conventional methods are used in classroom teaching.
The quality of class room teaching is certainly enhanced by using modern techniques.
The teaching-learning process would be certainly effective. Number of steps have been
initiated in this direction, which has created a positive impact. Faculty are utilizing projectors
for PPTs, Models for practical observation and animations also, wherever models are not
available. These animations are mostly developed by the faculty of the department by
utilizing the modern software. E-learning is also introduced through MOODLE’s software.
VII. Quality of sessional question papers needs improvement.
Question papers are being prepared such that they meet the course outcomes which
reflect Bloom’s taxonomy. The question papers are also peer reviewed to maintain standards.
VIII. Assessment of internal assessment answer sheets and laboratory work is not
satisfactory.
The scheme of evaluation is prepared and is followed by the faculty in assessing the
internal mid exams. To make the laboratory evaluation process methodological and object
oriented, Rubrics has been introduced. The faculty in the lab class work evaluate each
student as per the Rubrics prepared for each Laboratory.
IX. Involvement of industry in teaching- learning process is inadequate.
The inputs from industry are considered through meetings of Academic planning and
Monitoring cell and departmental BOS in which representatives at executive level of industry
are involved.
We are also conducting hands on training programmes for students on Automobile, NDT &
R&AC to get practical exposure.
Workshops organised:
Name of the workshop External Agency involved
2016-17
Bike Overhauling SAE
Fabrication of
Unmanned Ariel
Vehicles
HOBBYPEP
2017-18
Automobile
Explorations - Autotrix JV workshops Pvt Ltd
Application of Non-
Destructive Testings in
Industrial Sectors
NATTS (National Academy
Training & Technical
Services)
2018-19
Design & Development
of E-mobility Vehicle Imagine to Innovate
Problem Solving skills
using C
AP State Skill Development
Corporation
B. Deficiencies:
I. Course outcomes are not written properly.
COs have been thoroughly modified in light of the comments of NBA. Bloom’s
taxonomy is adhered in formulating the COs with the higher levels of learning included.
II. Students are unaware of PEOs, POs and COs.
Display boards containing PEOs, POs and PSOs have been conspicuously placed in
every floor to draw the attention of students. The Course Outcomes of all subjects
pertaining to a year have been displayed in the respective class rooms. This had a positive
impact on the students. We are also arranging special classes exclusively for educating
the students on OBE and its objectives at the start of academic year. During the
commencement of class work in each course, faculty explains about COs.
III. Faculty research papers are published only in local journals. Very few papers have
been published in quality journals.
The management has always encouraged the faculty to pursue research vigorously
and produce quality papers. Financial incentives have also been earmarked to this end to
produce papers in quality journals. The statistics of the papers published in the last three
academic years is tabulated below:
Academic Year Total Papers UGC referred SCOPUS
2016-17 19 1 0
2017-18 55 15 1
2018-19 (as on 31-
12-2018)
23 7 1
IV. Sponsored research is inadequate.
Sponsored projects are being applied to different government funding agencies every
year.
Research projects applied to various funding agencies
Academic
Year
Name of Faculty Details Funds
received
from
Amount
Rs.
Reference
No.
Status
2018-19 Dr.K.Siva Prasad AICTE
Conference
grant
AICTE 1,00,000 -- Result
awaited
Dr.K.Siva Prasad AICTE-ISTE
Induction
program
AICTE 3,00,000 -- Result
awaited
Dr.B.Naga Raju STTP AICTE 4,00,000 -- Result
awaited
Dr.K. Aditya Early Career
Scheme
DST-
SERB
25,00,000
Result
awaited
2017-18 Dr.B.Naga Raju MODROBS AICTE 12,00,000 9-
165/RFID/M
ODROB/poli
cy-1/2016-
2017
Sanctioned
Dr.B.Naga Raju AICTE-ISTE
Induction
program
AICTE 3,00,000 ISTE/AICTE
-ISTE FDP-
1-
3325237320/
2018
Sanctioned
2016-17 Dr.K.Siva Prasad International
Travel Grant
AICTE 1,50,000 10-
18/RIFD/G/Polic
y-1/2016-17
Sanctioned
Dr.K.Siva Prasad Seminar
Grant
AICTE 1,00,000 7-
4/RIFD/SG/POL
-1/2016-17
Sanctioned
V. No industrial consultancy.
The department has recently procured 3-tonne Computerised Universal Testing Machine
through MODROBS. The department now envisages to obtain consultancy work from
local industries.
VI. Quality of curriculum is also an issue but since the college has been granted
Autonomous institute status by UGC, this may be taken care by the new BOS.
The concern expressed by the NBA evaluator on the quality of the curriculum is true and
is in line with our views on this subject. Now that the college has obtained autonomous
status, the entire curriculum has been thoroughly modified and examined by expert
members of BOS and Academic Council. A number of modifications with regards to the
course structure and syllabi of different subjects is done.
top related