myweb.facstaff.wwu.edumyweb.facstaff.wwu.edu/patrick/envs368--hawaii... · web viewhe plans to...
Post on 14-Mar-2018
217 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Page 1 of 27
CAN HAWAII FEED ITSELF?Island farmers, ranchers, landowners, nonprofits and government agencies address the challenges of food self-sufficiency with a blend of innovation, investments and collaboration
Dennis Hollier November, 2014
Richard Ha and I climb into the cab of his big pickup and drive up the mountain.
I’ve come to Hamakua Springs, Ha’s 600-acre farm in Pepeekeo on the Big Island, to help see the
future of Hawaii agriculture. Ha is a resourceful and outspoken farmer, and I want to hear his views
on the increasingly fashionable notion that Hawaii could grow most of its own food. The issue,
known variously as food security, food sustainability and food sovereignty, hinges on a few key
questions: Can the land and water once devoted to the big sugar and pineapple plantations now
support diversified agriculture? What investments and resources are necessary to make Hawaii
agriculture more efficient? Finally, can the state’s growing welter of small farmers – most with
much smaller operations than Hamakua Springs – ever compete with cheap imports from the
mainland and the world? With a few important caveats, Ha says he’s optimistic about the future,
and he wants to show me why.
Page 2 of 27
Photo: Jason Kalawe
We drive slowly uphill, traversing the length of the farm. The truck rumbles past packing sheds and
outbuildings, past dozens of greenhouses bursting with tomatoes, past neat rows of banana trees
and fields of taro, and, higher up, past fallow fields thick with weeds. Finally, in the topmost corner
of the farm, we stop near a grove of trees that runs along the edge of a gulch.
Here, a finger of Ha’s farm reaches out and touches the Waiaama River. This land, he says, was
thrown in almost as an afterthought when he bought the property. The idea was to ensure he would
always have access to water. Today, this trickle of water represents the future of the farm – not just
for irrigation, but as the centerpiece of Ha’s evolving ambitions: hydroelectric power.
Page 3 of 27
Running along the high bank of the gulch is an old concrete irrigation flume, a relic of the defunct
Pepeekeo Plantation. A shallow stream chuckles down the flume before spilling into a new
concrete diverter.
“I think the general term for this is a headworks,” Ha says.
He shows me how, as the water is shunted to the right, it riffles briefly over a fine grate. The grate
allows some water to pass over it and sluice back into the Waiaama; the rest, now filtered of debris,
falls through the grate into a 22-inch pipe. This buried pipeline is called the millrace. It runs more
than a kilometer down the hill to a 20-foot container that houses Ha’s new hydro plant. There, the
surging water powers a turbine-driven, 115-kilowatt Lincoln generator before tumbling out the
spillway into an irrigation ditch.
Richard Ha owns Hamakua Springs Country Farms, one of the largest producers of tomatoes in the Islands. Photos: Jason Kalawe
Ha says this system, which cost hundreds of thousands of dollars and will likely take years to
amortize, can generate nearly twice the 50 kilowatts the farm currently consumes. Although
Page 4 of 27
HELCO, the local power company, won’t buy his excess power, Ha isn’t worried. He plans to use
the surplus to transform the way Hamakua Springs does business.
Driving Down the Cost of Energy
Like most farmers, Richard Ha understands how the high cost of energy in Hawaii hampers
agriculture. Energy runs your trucks and tractors and, in many cases, the pumps that irrigate your
fields or water your cows. Electricity keeps your processing plant humming, cools your chiller and
powers your milking barn. Energy runs a farm like it runs any business.
Hawaii farmers are at a particular disadvantage because of the state’s reliance on petroleum – a
dependence that their farming competitors on the mainland and around the world rarely share.
“More than 70 percent of Hawaii’s electricity is generated from oil,” Ha says. “On the mainland,
it’s only 1 percent. That’s why we can’t compete with anything manufactured on the mainland
when it has electricity costs embedded in it.” That’s why he invested in hydro and why he supports
geothermal and other renewable energy sources.
“If we were able to figure out a way to get cheaper electricity, over time, we could get an
advantage, and then we could start doing other things.”
Ha is still trying to figure out what those “other things” are for his farm. He envisions Hamakua
Springs as an agricultural hub that provides space and services to other farmers, such as a certified
kitchen, fertilizer manufacturing and a packing plant. All those become possible when energy is
cheap, and all affect the price of food.
“In the final analysis,” Ha says, “it’s all about costs. The customers will go to where it’s cheapest.
So if our electricity was cheaper, the people would buy the stuff made here.”
Raising Cattle in Hawaii or Shipping ’Em Out?
Page 5 of 27
Energy poses a special problem for ranchers. Although more and more people are turning to grass-
fed beef – for both health and ethical reasons – most Americans still prefer the marbled meat that
comes from grain-finished beef. For the most part, that means a Hawaii rancher who wanted to sell
beef here would either have to ship in feed for finishing or grow his own. Shipping grain isn’t
economical – it takes seven pounds of grain to produce a single pound of beef – but growing your
own is also impractical. It would require you to ship in fertilizer and pesticide, and it might require
irrigation, another energy hog.
As livestock manager for Parker Ranch, Jason Van Tassell presides over a herd of about 40,000 head of cattle. Ranch operations also
include turkeys, horses and sheep. Photos: Jason Kalawe
Page 6 of 27
So, for the most part, Hawaii ranchers quit finishing their cows here in 1990, after the last feedlot
closed on Oahu. “Most ranchers here are cow/calf operators now,” says Jason Van Tassell,
livestock manager for Parker Ranch. In other words, they keep just enough cows – “stockers” – to
breed a herd of calves to sell. “Hawaii’s great for that, because we have good grass here. The model
has been: You have a calf, and when you wean the calf, it goes to the mainland, where it’s grown
out and marketed. Then, all that beef gets shipped back for local consumers.”
Ranchers were surprised to find they actually made more money this way than finishing the cows
themselves. At least for a while.
“That model worked for a couple of years,” Van Tassell says, “because the shipping costs were
low. But, later, the shipping costs got more expensive. And, remember, it’s shipping two ways. It’s
shipping the calf there, and then shipping the food product back.” Those costs cut into ranchers’
margins.
Not surprisingly, many of them now are looking at the trend toward grass-fed beef as an option. In
fact, many ranches have always retained a few stockers for local finishing. But now, well-known
operations, such as Kualoa Ranch and Kuahiwi Ranch, are actively marketing a grass-fed product.
And last March, Parker Ranch, the largest ranch in the state, launched the Paniolo Cattle Co., a
joint venture with the Ulupono Initiative, Pierre Omidyar’s impact-investing arm in Hawaii, to
develop a statewide grass-fed beef industry. This is precisely the sort of partnership that will be
necessary for local ranchers to meet a significant percentage of the state’s protein demand. But it
won’t be easy.
Van Tassell points out that managing a herd for grass-fed beef is a different operation.
“With a cow/calf operation, you take a cow and she can survive on pretty marginal land. She can
raise a calf pretty efficiently. But when we take the calf from the cow, it becomes our job to make
sure it has the right nutrition in its diet. The quality of forage has to improve in the stocker stage,
which is between 450 pounds and 800 pounds. That’s when it needs to be on its very best forage.
Page 7 of 27
The plan of nutrition for that animal needs to be on a steady upward incline. We have to be
allocating our resources to put the right animal on the right acreage at the right time. That’s really
what we’re striving to do with Paniolo Cattle Co.”
Even in such operations, Hawaii is at a disadvantage with ranchers in temperate climates, Van
Tassell says.
“On this island, we grow an abundance of grass. But we’re in a subtropical area, so the types of
grasses that grow here are warm-season grasses. They have a high moisture content, and cattle
aren’t as efficient on that type of grass.” The difference isn’t negligible. Range-fed beef in Hawaii
gain about a pound a day. In temperate grasses on the mainland they would double that. At a
mainland feedlot, they would gain nearly four pounds a day.
“One advantage we do have, though,” Van Tassell says, “is our grass grows 12 months out of the
year. That makes it economical, from a business point of view, so we’re able to graze these cattle
here.”
But Parker Ranch’s Paniolo Cattle Co. is still in its early stages. It has only about 1,400 stockers in
the grass-fed beef program, out of the ranch’s herd of about 40,000 animals. If market demand
materializes, the company plans to increase that to 4,000 head or so – still only 10 percent of the
total operation.
Page 8 of 27
To understand why ranchers are reluctant to go all in on grass finishing, look at the numbers. Jill
Andrade-Mattos, president of Hawaii Big Island Beef, sketches those numbers out from the
perspective of both a rancher and a processer.
“These weaners, they come in at 400 to 550 pounds,” she says. “Then, the rancher keeps them
another six months and sends them off to the mainland. So, he makes $780 to $1000 per animal in
just six months. But you’ve got to hold grass-finished animals for close to a year and a half before
they’re ready to go to the processor.” When the rancher does the math, the numbers don’t add up.
Jason Moniz, a state veterinarian and owner of KK Ranch, tallies the figures for a hypothetical 700-
pound steer at the current price of $1.65 a pound.
“They’re making $1,155 on a grass-finished animal, if they keep it another year and a half. But, in
that time, you could have raised another calf and a half. So, you can take the $780 for a calf and
multiply by two and a half. That’s $1,950.” In other words, the rancher loses almost $800 of
potential income on one hypothetical 700-pound steer. It’s not hard to see why grass finishing
remains a hard sell for most ranchers.
Page 9 of 27
That’s not to say there isn’t some reason for optimism in the grass-fed beef industry. First, the
demand, while still small as a percentage of the total market, is real. Whole Foods Market
sometimes pays as much as $2.00 a pound, which is more than ranchers get for calves.
There are also promising developments for processors. For example, Hawaii Big Island Beef,
which runs the Hawaii Beef Slaughterhouse, has worked with partners such as Ulupono and
landlord Kamehameha Schools to improve the neighboring pastures using irrigation, fertilizer and
new forms of forage. The idea is that ranchers can sell their weaners to the processor for finishing.
All that is critical for the state’s limited number of processors, most of which, like Hawaii Beef
Slaughterhouse, are underused.
“I have fixed costs in the plant,” says Andrade-Mattos. “My refrigeration, my pumping and my
well – those are all fixed costs, so, no matter what I do, those costs are there. In order to lower the
cost per animal, I have to increase throughput. If I have that throughput, I can pass along more
money to the ranchers.”
Technology Is Crucial to Sustainability
Closely tied to the energy challenge is the issue of technology. Most of the increases in productivity
(and reductions in cost) in agriculture over the last century have been because of advancements in
technology. That’s just as true in Hawaii as anywhere else.
John Cross, the land manager for Olson Trust and, before that, for the Big Five company C.
Brewer, likes to chart the role technology has played here. “There’s no farmer on this earth that’s
smarter at growing tropical crops than the Hawaiian farmer,” he says. “We have an agricultural
college. We’re affluent. We know what we’re doing. We’re smart. We can take a crop from the
19th century and turn it into a 21st century crop within a couple of years. With the university and
the Department of Agriculture and the tenacity and willpower of the Hawaiian agriculturalist, we
are world leaders. The problem is that the rest of the world comes over here and copies us and takes
Page 10 of 27
that knowledge back to Taiwan or the Philippines or Thailand, and now we’re battling against our
own knowledge being used against us in a Third-World country.”
He gives examples, such as phaelianopsis orchids, sugar cane and even macadamia nuts, for which
Hawaii farmers developed the varieties of crops and methods of growing, only to be out-competed
by copycat farmers in Latin America, Africa and Southeast Asia.
Nevertheless, he says, technology is still our edge.
The problem is that today’s technology is often too capital intensive for Hawaii’s small farmers.
It’s also often not efficient on a small scale.
Dean Okimoto, owner of Nalo Farms in Waimanalo, gives an example. “About seven years ago, I
went to see the Dole Fresh processing facility in Salinas, Calif. The facility is 6 acres under roof. It
has 24 wash lines, with each line producing 55 bags of greens a minute. So, how can small guys
compete?”
A local example is Larry Jefts, who came to Hawaii from the mainland 40 years ago and brought
some mainland economies of scale with him. With thousands of acres in production on multiple
islands, his Sugarland Farms is probably the largest farm in Hawaii. Because of that scale, he can
use technology like GPS-guided combines that would make no sense on the average 5-acre farm.
That way, he’s able to drive down his costs and, for some crops, even compete with mainland
producers on price.
But agricultural technology is about more than machinery, Jefts says. “Here, we find academics
working on things important to us and we partner with them. We provide the infrastructure for their
research trials, and we get to use the technology they develop.” That allows Jefts to introduce new
crops or improved processes.
Jefts points to the Big Island Dairy on the Hamakua Coast as another example of capitalizing on
technology. It’s another mainland company that made a big investment because it saw opportunity
Page 11 of 27
in Hawaii. It reportedly spent $14 million to buy the old Island Dairy and then added more
investments. According to Jefts, it also built a big, modern milking barn. Each cow there has a chip
implanted in its ear so sensors can track its productivity. That technology made the Hamakua
operation plausible: The company realized Hawaii’s dairy cows were under-producing and thought
it could do better.
Maybe you see a trend here: big mainland farmers using the advantages of technology and scale to
make farming in Hawaii work. Jimmy Nakatani, executive director of the state’s Agribusiness
Development Corp., gives another example: Stephen Pianowski, a mainland farmer who set up a
bean operation on Kauai.
“The other farmers were skeptical,” Nakatani says. “The first question they asked him was: ‘Who’s
going to pick your beans?’ And he said, ‘Don’t worry, I have machines to do that.’ ”
If Hawaii is really going to grow its agricultural base, Jefts says, it’s going to be because of people
like himself – people with the capital to invest in technology and large-scale operations. “We’re not
going to build that kind of agriculture with 800 small farmers,” he says. “It’s going to be
commercial operations with state-of-the-art agriculture. This is not a popular position, but we have
to be efficient at what we’re going to do or we’re not going to be competitive.”
Jason Van Tassell, from Parker Ranch, puts it another way: “When the general public thinks of
sustainable farming, I think they see a guy out in a field hand-picking vegetables and hoeing weeds.
But I think sustainability means using every bit of technology that’s out there, putting it to use to
improve productivity. We’ve been around since 1845. That seems sustainable to me.”
Plenty of Land, But Not ENOUGH Farming Infrastructure
Of course, the issues of energy and technology are moot if we don’t have enough land and water to
feed ourselves. But, first, what do we mean when we say “feed ourselves?” By some estimates, we
Page 12 of 27
import 90 percent of our food and export 80 percent of our agricultural production. How can we
make a dent in those numbers?
“Step inside a Safeway and see what a supermarket really sells,” says Richard Ha. “Most of it is
some sort of processed food. It’s dried or frozen, made or manufactured somewhere else. If you
look at the produce department as a percentage of the entire store, it’s not very large.” Most of
what’s in that supermarket will never be replaced by Hawaii products, even the basic food stuffs.
No one expects that Hawaii farmers will ever produce the wheat, corn and rice that make up so
much of our locally consumed calories. So, as Ha suggests, when we speak of “feeding ourselves,”
what we really mean is fresh produce and a few value-added products. That’s a smaller nut to
crack; we already produce relatively high percentages of the fruits and vegetables we consume
here.
With that limitation, let’s ask the question again: Do we have enough land to feed ourselves? Most
experts think so. Giorgio Caldarone, regional asset manager for Kamehameha Schools, the largest
agricultural landholder in the state, says, “We’ve heard there’s more than enough land here to feed
ourselves if we wanted to.”
Sydney Keliipuleole, operations director for the land assets division at Kamehameha, goes even
further.
“I think we have enough acres just on Oahu,” he says. “People estimate it would take between
3,000 acres and 30,000 acres to do it. There’s all that state land in the central part of Oahu. If we
were to replace all of that with commodity-level farms, we could get pretty close. Not including
beef. Hawaii Island is the key to beef.”
The problem with much of the best land in the state, Caldarone says, isn’t quantity, it’s neglect.
“As the plantation era sort of came to a close, with the end of sugar and pineapple, large landscapes
reverted back to the landowners in various states of disrepair. And, for those last 20 or 30 years, the
Page 13 of 27
writing was on the wall, so the plantations weren’t making investments in things like irrigation
systems. By the time we got the properties back, a lot of the systems were in pretty bad shape,”
says Caldarone.
Since then, Kamehameha has invested heavily in that infrastructure on Oahu. It has spent millions
of dollars on the irrigation systems and roads for its properties on the North Shore and in Punaluu.
It has also been investing in farmers, trying hard to identify and support people who can work all
that land.
That’s not to say Kamehameha Schools is overconfident. Keliipuleole points out that a lot of the
non-farm infrastructure necessary for food self-sufficiency is missing.
“That’s the processing, the value-added services, the delivery, the market connections.” All that
infrastructure, he says, has to be in place before we can address the food-security question. On the
whole, though, Kamehameha seems confident that its investment in agriculture will pay dividends.
Page 14 of 27
Ulupono’s Kyle Datta is also confident. “Do we have enough land to feed ourselves? The answer is
unequivocally ‘yes.’ Of the food we eat that is fresh food, outside of the grains and the oils that go
with the grains, a significant portion can be locally grown at prices affordable to everybody.” But
Datta adds a pair of provisos: “We have enough land and water to achieve that – if we use some
best practices in terms of agricultural productivity, and if we honor and respect how land is zoned.”
Ulupono is focused on both those caveats. On the issue of best practices, for example, Ulupono
plans to borrow grass-fed-dairy technology from New Zealand for its own dairy operation on
Kauai. Similarly, it has worked with University of Texas researchers to study how to best use
Hawaii’s water resources. And, as we’ve seen, it has done market studies to assess the demand for
homegrown food in Hawaii, an issue important to any local farmer.
On the issue of zoning, the most famous controversies, of course, surround urban development of
agricultural lands – places like Hoopili and Koa Ridge on Oahu. Advocacy groups, like the Sierra
Club and the Hawaii Food Policy Council, view the loss of these important agricultural lands (a
descriptive term that sometimes overlaps with the legal classification, Important Agricultural
Lands) as catastrophic. Even if the agriculture system is able to weather the loss of agricultural hot
spots, like Hoopili, the controversy highlights some of the inherent conflicts between agriculture
and development. For example, if landowners believe they may one day be able to convert their
inexpensive farmlands into valuable subdivisions, they’re unlikely to offer long-term leases to
tenant farmers. Absent long-term leases, farmers are reluctant to invest in infrastructure and often
unable to get loans. Many of Hawaii’s small farmers are on year-to-year, even month-to-month,
leases – hardly encouraging for a young farmer.
The encroachment of development on agricultural lands creates other problems. When Ulupono
tried to help revive the state’s moribund dairy industry with a startup, 583-acre, grass-fed dairy on
Kauai, its Mahaulepu neighbors, including the Grand Hyatt Kauai Resort, balked at the idea. Even
though the property was zoned agricultural, and most neighbors were required to get variances to
build in the area, they objected to some of the nuisances of being next door to a working dairy.
Page 15 of 27
Ulupono relented, announcing it would reduce the initial size of the herd from 1,800 cows to fewer
than 700.
The same kind of scenario has played itself out in the GMO debates and the pesticide fights.
Whatever side you take in these arguments, it’s clear that farming and development don’t mix. As
suburban sprawl moves people closer to agricultural areas, conflict is inevitable. So, while we may
have plenty of farmland available, the people of Hawaii are less and less likely to want large-scale
farming in their neighborhoods. That makes the question, “Do we have enough land?” something of
a red herring.
Economics Suggests Hawaii Should Specialize
Maybe the question isn’t, “Can we feed ourselves?” but “Should we feed ourselves?”
According to modern, liberal economic theory, maybe not. As pointed out by Peter Garrod, an
agricultural economist and the former vice chancellor for research at UH, individuals, companies
and even countries reach their greatest efficiency when they specialize.
“Most of your readers, I suspect, are specialized. They do one thing quite well, and they use their
earnings from that to buy lots of other goods. If they tried to produce everything they wanted, they
probably couldn’t do everything very well.” The same is true for countries and states. The
argument is quite simple: If we can buy cheaper food elsewhere, we should focus our efforts on
more profitable activities.
It’s not that Garrod thinks we should give up on agriculture; we should just be realistic about our
goals.
“Can we feed ourselves?” Garrod says. “If all we did was produce food for ourselves, we would be
able to come close. But we would become an agrarian society. On the other hand, could we feed
ourselves more than we do now? Absolutely. But even that probably involves a change in consumer
values, which I think is already occurring. Buy local, fresh foods, farmers markets, grass-fed beef –
Page 16 of 27
these are all trends that allow us to produce more of our own food. But, what proportion of our food
should we produce? Well, we’re going to have a hard time if we want wheat and rice and all those
other things we enjoy eating. I don’t think we’re going to produce those here.”
Economics does suggest what kinds of agriculture, other than the obvious export crops, make the
most sense in Hawaii.
“Transportation costs do make the transaction costs higher for importers,” Garrod says. “This aids
local producers. If we had essentially free trade with the mainland, a lot of our local producers
would have a hard time competing. We have expensive land, expensive water, expensive labor. But
we don’t have free trade; we have a pretty substantial transportation cost. That gives local
producers a sort of tariff protection. Goods come here with the cost of transportation added on. We
don’t have to pay the transportation cost, so we can compete with that. Our products can be
fresher.”
For Larry Jefts, that calculus is an explicit part of his decision on what crops to grow: If the
shipping costs for mainland producers exceed the added cost of growing that product in Hawaii, it’s
a potentially profitable crop. For instance, that’s why Jefts grows a lot of watermelons.
Anthony Aalto, secretary of the Sierra Club’s Oahu Group, points out there are other economic
advantages to the grow local movement. For example, it allows us to capitalize on the Hawaii brand
for export or for sale to tourists.
“We have the ability,” Aalto says, “to grow things that can then be processed to generate added
value. If we grow cacao then we could then turn it into chocolate. And because Hawaii in and of
itself is such a unique brand and has such an image attached to it, organic chocolate grown in
Hawaii is instantly going to have a cachet and a brand and a value attached to it that can generate
huge amount of income to bring back to the state.”
Page 17 of 27
Even the food grown for local consumption has important economic impacts at home, Aalto says.
“When you talk about import replacement, you’re talking about dollars that are going out to the
mainland, or to Asia or somewhere, that could stay here. Every dollar spent on a food item that’s
grown in Hawaii is a dollar that doesn’t go to California and it stays to boost the local economy.”
Yet, most economists believe the benefits from specialization and trade outweigh the costs.
“The basic issue,” Garrod says, “is that we could become more sustainable if we were willing to
decrease our lifestyle. ‘Decrease’ is probably the wrong word, but it helps to remember that trade
increases total social wealth. The more sustainable we became, the less time we would have to
make money doing something else.”
Government’s Role, Though Diminished, Remains Crucial
If the idea is to increase Hawaii’s production of food, what role does government play in that
process? Well, for one thing, it’s shrinking.
“Do you know what the percentage of the state budget the Department of Agriculture gets?” says
Dean Okimoto. “It’s 0.7 percent – not even 1 percent. Somebody recently told me that, in the 1960s
and 1970s, it was about 15 percent.” To Okimoto, this decline reflects similar changes in the
Legislature.
“Did you know, in the 1960s, the majority of our legislators were farmers. So they understood
agriculture and could help agriculture.” Today, Okimoto says, only one or two legislators are true
farmers. “So, it’s difficult for these guys to understand the issues. And even if they do understand,
if there’s a vocal minority out there, they will kowtow to the vocal minority.”
Others are more upbeat about the role of government. On the Hamakua Coast, ranchers such as
Jason Moniz praise the state government for allowing ranchers to buy discounted water from the
Hamakua Ditch. Starting in January, they’ll pay 25 cents per thousand gallons. That’s still higher
Page 18 of 27
than the 10 cents they were seeking, but it’s low enough to start using pasture irrigation in a few
key areas.
John Cross, at Olsen Trust, highlights another important point about government’s role. “We have a
department that’s run by one of us,” he says. “Who gets appointed to head the Department of
Agriculture? It’s not a politician; it’s a farmer. The current guy, Scott Enright, used to grow guava
and, before that, sugar.”
Similarly, Jimmy Nakatani, the director of the Agribusiness Development Corp., the other key
agency promoting diversified agriculture in the state, is a former farmer and former chair of the
state Department of Agriculture. At least, the bureaucrats are technically savvy.
That’s especially important at the ADC, which was created in 1994 to help Hawaii agriculture find
its way after the demise of sugar and pineapple. Its primary mission is to acquire and manage key
agricultural infrastructure – irrigation systems and high-grade lands – that were once the purview of
the big plantations. Nakatani, who took over as executive director in 2011, gives a few examples of
how the agency works.
“One of the first projects ADC started with was the Waiahole Ditch,” he says. This was the
controversial case over the diversion of water from Windward Oahu to the big sugar plantations on
the Leeward side. With the demise of Big Sugar, communities like Waiahole and Waikane wanted
that water to remain on the Windward Side and flow through their valleys. Although cultural and
environmental advocates prevailed in getting more water for loi and higher stream flow, Waiahole
Ditch still delivers water to some of the largest farms in the state in Leeward Oahu.
“I think that went very well,” Nakatani says, “if you look at the number of jobs that are there
because the ditch is there. I always look at it as 1,500 to 2,000 jobs, or $150 million worth of
business for the state. It doesn’t seem like that because it’s kind of an innocent-looking ditch – plus
an amazing tunnel – running from one side of the island to another. But it services the prison. It
services Mililani mortuary. It services Mililani Golf Course. And, of course, it services a lot of
Page 19 of 27
farms. I’m not sure how many farms, but it includes Larry Jefts and Aloun Farms, of course
Monsanto and Syngenta, and then there are a lot of small farms at Mililani Agricultural Park. It’s
quite an amazing system.”
ADC also oversees a large and somewhat controversial project on Kauai. “In Kekaha,” Nakatani
says, “in the Mana plains, we’ve got approximately 4,000 to 5,000 acres of good land. Most of the
land is currently occupied by the seed corn companies, who came in and took care of the
infrastructure. We got criticism for that, but you have to have transition. You have to have
resources to help you.”
Now, a couple of large vegetable farms have subleased land from the seed-corn companies. It’s a
symbiotic relationship, Nakatani says. Because of the way seed corn is grown, with extensive
buffer zones and long fallow periods, as much as 80 percent of the Kekaha land is unused at any
given time. Nakatani hopes to eventually see 500 or 1,000 acres of diversified agriculture there on
the Mana plains.
A Model for the Future
The jewel in the ADC crown is probably the Whitmore Project in Central Oahu. Like many
plantation towns, Wahiawa went through a precipitous economic decline when the Dole Plantation
closed in 1991. The Whitmore Project, the dream child of state Sen. Donovan Dela Cruz, is an
ambitious attempt to take the old, derelict pieces of the pineapple era and use them to create a
thriving diversified-agricultural hub. It’s had a promising start.
At the core of the Whitmore Project is the 1,700-acre Galbraith Estate, which was purchased in
2012 with funds from the state, the City and County of Honolulu, the U.S. Army, the Office of
Hawaiian Affairs and D.R. Horton Schuler Division. This acquisition gave the ADC 1,200 acres of
long-fallow land (OHA received the other 500), which it has already begun to clear and lease to
farmers. ADC is also planning and developing the necessary irrigation systems.
Page 20 of 27
The Whitmore Project isn’t just another way for the state to lease agricultural lands. The state also
authorized the purchase of an additional 24-acre parcel to serve as an “Ag-Tech” hub, as well as an
old industrial warehouse in downtown Wahiawa to be used for packing and processing. In addition,
ADC has partnered with the Hawaii Housing Finance Development Corp. to acquire a small parcel
of urban land near Schofield Barracks. Dela Cruz envisions this property, adjacent to the area’s
only high-rise, as the site of high-density workforce housing. There’s more in the works, including
the imminent purchase of 20,000 acres from Dole Food for $175 million.
All these acquisitions surround downtown Wahiawa and Whitmore Village, the former plantation
town across the gulch. Dela Cruz believes that, by clustering all these agricultural services, ADC
can create the right environment for diversified agriculture to thrive. It certainly seems to solve
many of the most persistent problems for farmers: short-term leases, distance from market, access
to processing and packing, even capital.
Dela Cruz cites the example of Ho Farms.
“They have 50 acres, more or less, in Kahuku, and they were selling their produce to Costco. But,
when Costco started to implement new food-safety rules, almost overnight 80 percent of their
production was lost. But, because they’re on a short-term lease at Kahuku, they cannot get a loan to
build a food safety facility. As part of the Whitmore Project, though, they can get a long-term lease
from ADC.” That gives them land, access to capital and proximity to their major markets.
Page 21 of 27
Shin Ho of Ho Farms and state Sen. Donovan Dela Cruz stand in an old warehouse outside Wahiawa that Ho Farms plans to renovate into
a food-safety facility. Dela Cruz hopes the Whitmore Project can convert the remains of Wahiawa’s pineapple plantations into the
infrastructure for a diversified agriculture center. Photo: David Croxford
The Ho family is also leasing an old warehouse in the Ag-Tech Hub and refurbishing it as a modern
food-safety facility. This project will likely cost more than $1 million, which the Hos will fund
using rent credits from ADC. In other words, their rent is reduced for a certain time to help defray
the cost of the build-out.
The beauty of this approach, Dela Cruz says, is there are no out-of-pocket costs to ADC. “By using
rent/lease credits, ADC doesn’t have to subsidize anything.” In fact, ADC has a comparatively
small operating budget, generating most of its own income from rents and fees. (Acquisitions,
though, are usually paid for with state capital spending or general-purpose bonds.)
Page 22 of 27
The most remarkable feature of the Whitmore Project is that so much of it has either already
happened, or the funds have already been appropriated. That’s largely due to Dela Cruz’s work,
both as a state senator and, before that, as a city councilman.
Aware of the politics involved, Dela Cruz has scrupulously cultivated partnerships with the
agencies and people that can impact the project’s success. He has conducted over 70 site visits and
tours for the board members and key leaders of these organizations – not to mention press tours and
community outreach. Now, each of these organizations has a role to play in the Whitmore Project:
The Hawaii Public Housing Authority and HHFDC will help with workforce housing; the
Department of Education will help with workforce readiness; the UH College of Tropical
Agriculture and Human Resources will help with research and development and extension services;
the High Technology Development Corp. will help with food-safety applications. At least 12
agencies have a stake in the project’s success.
In short, building a diversified agriculture hub takes a lot of footwork and coordination.
Not everyone is happy, of course. ADC director Jimmy Nakatani says some people have
complained that the ADC favors larger farms, which don’t need the help as much as the small ones.
“When somebody asks, ‘What about the new farmers?’ I say, ‘New farmers are the responsibility
of the Department of Agriculture.’ That’s just the way it goes. ADC is about development. I don’t
want anybody who doesn’t have any experience, because the likelihood of them succeeding is not
very good.”
Some farmers have also complained the project is too focused on one area. But Dela Cruz views the
Whitmore Project as a template for other regions to apply according to their own circumstances.
Nakatani agrees.
“If you look at Wailua (on Oahu’s North Shore), there’s an industrial area; there’s agricultural land
surrounding it. And it’s probably better off than Whitmore because Wailua was sugar, so it had
better irrigation.”
Page 23 of 27
“I can also see it in Pahala, on the Big Island,” he says. “It’s far away from anything. In fact, that’s
even a better template. There is infrastructure over there. There’s development with agricultural
land surrounding it. There’s a hub for marshaling, so if you have to go sell your produce to Hilo,
you just load up in one central area and one guy makes the run, not 20 of them.”
Of course, what these communities need might not be more agricultural resources, but a resourceful
and energetic politician like Dela Cruz.
If all of these elements – energy, technology, coordination and more – come together, they
probably won’t be enough to make Hawaii completely self-sufficient in food – something we
haven’t seen since the days of the Hawaiian kingdom. But that doesn’t mean we can’t rejigger the
system to make local farming more productive and enable it to grab a bigger share of locally eaten
fruit, vegetables and other foods. Sometimes, that may mean building a Whitmore Project or
farmers coming together in a cooperative. It could be an organization like Ulupono or
Kamehameha Schools absorbing some of the costs of research or infrastructure. Ultimately,
whatever it is, it has to make farming more profitable if we’re going to grow significantly more
food in Hawaii.
“That’s something I learned a long time ago,” Richard Ha likes to say. “Food security has to do
with farming. If the farmers can make money, farmers will farm.”
Do you like what you read? Subscribe to Hawaii Business Magazine
RELATED STORIES
Page 24 of 27
aio: Small Name, Big Promise
Talk Story: Rick Blangiardi & Scott Humber
100-Year Visions for Hawaii
ON NEWSSTANDS NOW
Page 25 of 27
Page 26 of 27
A U T H O R :
Dennis Hollier
Subscribe to our eNewsletter
Share Comments
Data
Top 250 Top 100 Realtors Best Places To Work
Events
HB Signature Events Community Events
Special Sections
Outstanding Hospitality, Meetings & Events Senior Living Guide Who’s Who in Hawaii Healthcare
Archive
June 2017 May 2017 April 2017
Topics
Best Places To Work
Business Trends
Careers
Company Profiles
Construction
Economics
Page 27 of 27
Education
Entrepreneurship
Finance Government
Healthcare
Leadership
Marketing
Nonprofits
Real Estate
Small Business
Sports
Success Stories
Sustainability
Technology
Top 250
Tourism
Up & Co
top related