monitor 21 april 2020 - bfr · bfr corona-monitor | 21 april 2020 22 figures given in percentages...
Post on 24-Aug-2020
2 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
21 April 2020BfR Corona
MONITOR
72
43
20
17
24
18
11
33
62
flu coronavirus cancer
(very) large
medium
(very) small
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020 2
Figures given in percentages
Basis: 464–492 participants
Perceived effects on your own healthAssuming you have one of the following diseases: How large or small do you consider the health effects of this to be for you personally?
(Response scale: 1 ‘very small’ to 5 ‘very large’)
Figures given in percentages
Basis: 147–172 participants in corresponding age group
9
10
14
23
29
47
76
59
51
flu coronavirus cancer
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020 3
14 to 39 years
40 to 59 years
60 years and over
Perceived effects on your own health – age groupsAssuming you have one of the following diseases: How large or small do you consider the health effects of this to be for you personally?
(Response scale: 1 ‘very small’ to 5 ‘very large’) – Shown: response category ‘(very) large’ (values 4 + 5)
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020 4
Figures given in percentages
Basis: 464–513 participants
1816
1311 11
3734
40
26
33
60 59 58
52
62
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
24 Mar 31 Mar 07 Apr 14 Apr 21 Apr 28 Apr 05 May 12 May 19 May 26 May
cancer
flu
coronavirus
Perceived effects on your own health – over timeAssuming you have one of the following diseases: How large or small do you consider the health effects of this to be for you personally?
(Response scale: 1 ‘very small’ to 5 ‘very large’) – Shown: response category ‘(very) large’ (values 4 + 5)
10
19
71
(very) bad
(very) good
medium
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020 5
Figures given in percentages
Basis: 500 participants
Perceived informedness about what is happeningHow well or badly do you feel informed about what is happening with the novel coronavirus? (Response scale: 1 ‘very bad’ to 5 ‘very good’)
6
14
9
19
22
16
75
64
75
Figures given in percentages
Basis: 155–177 participants in corresponding age group
(very) goodmedium(very) bad
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020 6
14 to 39 years
40 to 59 years
60 years and over
Perceived informedness about what is happening – age groupsHow well or badly do you feel informed about what is happening with the novel coronavirus? (Response scale: 1 ‘very bad’ to 5 ‘very good’)
11 12 1510
17 1413 19
72 74 72 71
24 Mar 31 Mar 07 Apr 14 Apr 21 Apr 28 Apr 05 May 12 May 19 May 26 May
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020 7
Figures given in percentages
Basis: 499–510 participants
(very) good
(very) bad
medium
not
asked
Perceived informedness about what is happening – over timeHow well or badly do you feel informed about what is happening with the novel coronavirus? (Response scale: 1 ‘very bad’ to 5 ‘very good’)
78
58
33
31
9
television
internet
print media
radio
private contacts
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020 8
Figures given in percentages
Basis: 505 participants
Used sources of informationWhat sources do you use to inform yourself about what is happening with the novel coronavirus? You can name up to 3 sources.
(Open question) – Shown: mentions ≥ 5 %
Figures given in percentages
Basis: 159–176 participants in corresponding age group
67
76
20
21
14
79
67
30
34
9
87
31
50
37
5
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020 9
television
internet
print media
radio
private contacts
Used sources of information – age groupsWhat sources do you use to inform yourself about what is happening with the novel coronavirus? You can name up to 3 sources.
(Open question) – Shown: mentions ≥ 5 % (based on all participants)
40 to 59 years 60 years and over14 to 39 years
24 Mar 31 Mar 07 Apr 14 Apr 21 Apr 28 Apr 05 May 12 May 19 May 26 May
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020 10
Figures given in percentages
Basis: 498–515 participants
74
6 5
79
86
62
5
5
82
3
55
6460
2
6
84
1
58
27
3632
3135 34
28
35
9
5
78
3
58
31
33
Used sources of information – over timeWhat sources do you use to inform yourself about what is happening with the novel coronavirus? You can name up to 3 sources.
(Open question) – Shown: mentions ≥ 5 % (in at least one survey week)
television
internet
print media
radio
private contacts
professional contacts
Robert Koch Institute
96
94
90
86
85
83
80
71
50
4
6
10
14
15
17
20
29
50
restriction of travel activities
cancellation of events
closure of cultural institutions
mandatory use of masks
border controls
closure of day-carecentres and schools
contact prohibition
closure of shops
curfew
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020 11
Figures given in percentages
Basis: 489–501 participants
Appropriateness of the measures for containmentHow do you evaluate the following measures to contain the spread of the novel coronavirus?
(Response options: ‘not appropriate’, ‘appropriate’)
appropriate not appropriate
Figures given in percentages
Basis: 152–176 participants in corresponding age group
restriction of travel activities
cancellation of events
closure of cultural institutions
mandatory use of masks
border controls
closure of day-care
centres and schools
contact prohibition
closure of shops
curfew
100
98
94
93
83
92
87
83
57
92
92
84
76
88
77
70
56
45
98
93
91
92
83
81
82
77
49
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020 12
Appropriateness of the measures for containment – age groupsHow do you evaluate the following measures to contain the spread of the novel coronavirus?
(Response options: ‘not appropriate’, ‘appropriate’) – Shown: response category ‘appropriate’
14 to 39 years 40 to 59 years 60 years and over
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020 13
Figures given in percentages
Basis: 488–515 participants
mandatory use of masks
cancellation of events
restriction of travel activities
closure of day-care
centres and schools
contact prohibition
border controls
curfew
24 Mar 31 Mar 07 Apr 14 Apr 21 Apr 28 Apr 05 May 12 May 19 May 26 May
97
97
97 97
96
96
94 93
9288
91 90
96
93
95
87
85
86
95
92
94
89
85
closure of shops
84
a In the questionnaire since 21 Aprilb Wording until 14 April “the closing of most shops", since 21 April “the closing of certain shops”
a
b
94
90
96
83
80
85
86
86 84
67
59
74 72
64
55
71
50
Appropriateness of the measures for containment – over timeHow do you evaluate the following measures to contain the spread of the novel coronavirus?
(Response options: ‘not appropriate’, ‘appropriate’) – Shown: response category ‘appropriate’
closure of cultural institutions
46
33
20
19
12
11
6
19
avoiding the public
wearing protective clothing
complying with government regulations
using disinfectants
washing hands
keeping distance to others
paying more attention to hygiene in general
no measures
Figures given in percentages
Basis: 505 participants
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020 14
Protective measures of the participantsHave or had you taken measures to protect yourself or your family from the novel coronavirus?
(Response options: ‘no’, ‘yes, that is: ______’) – Shown: mentions ≥ 5 %
Figures given in percentages
Basis: 159–177 participants in corresponding age group
using disinfectants
washing hands
keeping distance to others
46
40
17
29
12
8
4
13
48
25
20
20
16
13
8
18
43
34
22
10
9
12
7
25
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020 15
14 to 39 years 40 to 59 years 60 years and over
Protective measures of the participants – age groupsHave or had you taken measures to protect yourself or your family from the novel coronavirus?
(Response options: ‘no’, ‘yes, that is: ______’) – Shown: mentions ≥ 5 % (based on all participants)
avoiding the public
wearing protective clothing
complying with govern-
ment regulations
paying more attention
to hygiene in general
no measures
24 Mar 31 Mar 07 Apr 14 Apr 21 Apr 28 Apr 05 May 12 May 19 May 26 May
Figures given in percentages
Basis: 499–515 participants
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020 16
47 47
915
6
16
32 22
16 15
8 8
52
13
23
22
14
8
12 9
913
9
9
42
17
22
26
16
8
13
11
46
20
33
19
12
6
11
19
Protective measures of the participants – over timeHave or had you taken measures to protect yourself or your family from the novel coronavirus?
(Response options: ‘no’, ‘yes, that is: ______’) – Shown: mentions ≥ 5 % (in at least one survey week)
avoiding the public
washing hands
keeping distance to others
using disinfectants
complying with govern-
ment regulations
paying more attention
to hygiene in general
wearing protective clothing
no measures
25
39
36
not sure (at all)
(very) sure
medium
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020 17
Figures given in percentages
Basis: 496 participants
Perceived controllability of the risk of infectionHow sure are you that you can protect yourself from an infection with the novel coronavirus?
(Response scale: 1 ‘not sure at all’ to 5 ‘very sure’)
Figures given in percentages
Basis: 156–172 participants in corresponding age group
17
33
24
40
38
38
43
29
38
(very) suremediumnot sure (at all)
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020 18
Perceived controllability of the risk of infection – age groupsHow sure are you that you can protect yourself from an infection with the novel coronavirus?
(Response scale: 1 ‘not sure at all’ to 5 ‘very sure’)
14 to 39 years
40 to 59 years
60 years and over
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020 19
Figures given in percentages
Basis: 494–514 participants
3929 33 32
25
33
4038
3439
28 31 2934 36
24 Mar 31 Mar 07 Apr 14 Apr 21 Apr 28 Apr 05 May 12 May 19 May 26 May
(very) sure
not sure (at all)
medium
Perceived controllability of the risk of infection – over timeHow sure are you that you can protect yourself from an infection with the novel coronavirus?
(Response scale: 1 ‘not sure at all’ to 5 ‘very sure’)
8
30
47
46
64
70
69
78
20
21
22
24
17
20
22
12
73
49
31
30
19
10
9
9
proximity to other people
door handles
cash
toys
dishes and cutlery
food
clothing
pets
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020 20
Figures given in percentages
Basis: 474–504 participants
Perceived probability of infection by transmission pathways How high or low do you estimate the probability of being infected with the novel coronavirus via the following paths?
(Response scale: 1 ‘very low’ to 5 ‘very high’)
(very) low medium (very) high
87
55
40
42
20
12
14
10
Figures given in percentages
Basis: 153–177 participants in corresponding age group
65
50
30
25
25
14
5
10
67
43
24
25
13
4
9
7
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020 21
Perceived probability of infection by transmission pathways – age groupsHow high or low do you estimate the probability of being infected with the novel coronavirus via the following paths?
(Response scale: 1 ‘very low’ to 5 ‘very high’) – Shown: response category ‘(very) high’ (values 4 + 5)
proximity to other people
door handles
cash
toys
dishes and cutlery
food
clothing
pets
14 to 39 years 40 to 59 years 60 years and over
24 Mar 31 Mar 07 Apr 14 Apr 21 Apr 28 Apr 05 May 12 May 19 May 26 May
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020 22
Figures given in percentages
Basis: 473–511 participants
81 79
61
63
45 44
3538
26 25
13 11
12
18
11 9
76
48
37
29
17
9
14
13
74
43
33
22
19
8
14
7
73
49
31
30
19
9
10
9
proximity to other people
door handles
cash
toys
dishes and cutlery
clothing
food
pets
Perceived probability of infection by transmission pathways – over timeHow high or low do you estimate the probability of being infected with the novel coronavirus via the following paths?
(Response scale: 1 ‘very low’ to 5 ‘very high’) – Shown: response category ‘(very) high’ (values 4 + 5)
21
32
36
11
both
health
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020 23
Figures given in percentages
Basis: 499 participants
economic
situation
neither
Impact on personal health versus economic situationWhat do you think affects you more: the impact of the novel coronavirus on health or on the economic situation?
(Response options: ‘impact on health’, ‘impact on economic situation’, ‘both equally’, ‘neither’)
Figures given in percentages
Basis: 157–176 participants in corresponding age group
18
13
34
18
40
37
56
40
13
8
8
17
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020 24
Impact on personal health versus economic situation – age groupsWhat do you think affects you more: the impact of the novel coronavirus on health or on the economic situation?
(Response options: ‘impact on health’, ‘impact on economic situation’, ‘both equally’, ‘neither’)
14 to 39 years
40 to 59 years
60 years and over
economic
situationhealth both neither
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020 25
Figures given in percentages
Basis: 499–515 participants
24 21
27 32
36 36
13 11
24 Mar 31 Mar 07 Apr 14 Apr 21 Apr 28 Apr 05 May 12 May 19 May 26 May
neither
health
both
economic
situation
not asked
Impact on personal health versus economic situation – over timeWhat do you think affects you more: the impact of the novel coronavirus on health or on the economic situation?
(Response options: ‘impact on health’, ‘impact on economic situation’, ‘both equally’, ‘neither’)
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020 26
24 March 2020 510 participants
31 March 2020 500 participants
07 April 2020 510 participants
14 April 2020 515 participants
21 April 2020 505 participants
Dates and sample sizes of the survey
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020 27
Statistical population: German-speaking population ages 14 years and over in private households in the
Federal Republic of Germany
Sampling: Samples drawn at random from land line and mobile telephone numbers which can also
include telephone numbers not listed in directories (in line with standards set by the
Association of German Market Research Institutes – ADM)
Data weighting: Data was weighted according to gender, education, age, employment, size of city and
German federal state to guarantee representativeness
Method: Telephone interview (CATI omnibus survey, Dual Frame)
Presentation of results: All figures given in percentages, rounding differences are possible, only valid responses
were included (response option ‘don‘t know’ was excluded from all analyses)
Conducted by: Kantar
How were the data collected?
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020 28
Do nanoparticles promote the occurrence of allergies? Does apple juice contain too much
aluminium? The German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, or BfR for short, is responsible for
answering questions on all aspects of the health assessment of foods and feeds, consumer
products and chemicals. Through its work, it makes a decisive contribution towards ensuring that
food, products and the use of chemicals have become safer in Germany.
The Institute's main tasks comprise the assessment of existing health risks and identification of
new ones, the development of recommendations to limit risks and the transparent communication
of this process. This work results in the scientific advice given to political decision makers. To help
with the strategic alignment of its risk communication, the BfR conducts its own research in the
field of risk perception. The Institute is independent in its scientific assessments, research and
communication. The BfR belongs to the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture
(BMEL).
More information at: www.bfr.bund.de/en
COVID-19/coronavirus:
> A-Z Index > C > COVID-19/corona
i
About the BfR
Imprint
BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020
Publisher: German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR)
Max-Dohrn-Straße 8–10
10589 Berlin
bfr@bfr.bund.de
www.bfr.bund.de/en
Photo: mathisworks/GettyImages
Use of the results published here is possible with mention of the source ‘BfR Corona-Monitor | 21 April 2020’.
This text version is a translation of the original German text which is the only legally binding version.
German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment
Max-Dohrn-Straße 8–10
10589 Berlin
GERMANY
Phone +40 30 18412-0
Fax +49 30 18412-99099
bfr@bfr.bund.de
www.bfr.bund.de/en
top related