low load and low sulphur fuel operation on two stroke diesel engines

Post on 14-Oct-2014

393 Views

Category:

Documents

9 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

© MAN Diesel © MAN Diesel

Stig Baungaard JakobsenMarine Low Speed – Operation

Copenhagen

Low Load and Low Sulphur Fuel Operation on MAN B&W Two Stroke Diesel Engines

© MAN Diesel

Recent Service Letters onLow Load Operation

2

© MAN Diesel 3

Test on a 8K80MC-C engine with Slide Valves

Test duration: 3 days on 10% Load

No engine load up

ConclusionNo significant change in fouling condition of exhaust gas ways

Low Load OperationService experience

© MAN Diesel 4

Inspection before test

Inspection after 1 day test

Inspection after 3 day test

Low Load OperationService experience

© MAN Diesel 5

Inspection before test

Inspection after 1 day test

Inspection after 3 day test

Low Load OperationService experience

© MAN Diesel 6

Inspection before test

Inspection after 1 day test

Inspection after 3 day test

Low Load OperationService experience

© MAN Diesel 7

Inspection before test

Inspection after 1 day test

Inspection after 3 day test

Low Load OperationService experience

© MAN Diesel 8

Inspection before test

Inspection after 1 day test

Inspection after 3 day test

Low Load OperationService experience

© MAN Diesel 9

Inspection before test

Inspection after 1 day test

Inspection after 3 day test

Low Load OperationService experience

© MAN Diesel

Feedback from vessels: Increased fouling in scavenge air receiver small

Slide fuel valve retrofit recommended

Cylinder oil feed rate too high Alpha Lubricator retrofit

Increased maintenance on auxiliary blowers extra blower onboard

Increased heat load on the exhaust valve spindles. Experienced in few cases related to T/C performance during low load. (30 – 40 % load)

Exhaust gas boiler condition more or less the same

Exhaust gas receiver condition more or less the same

Generally positive feed back on low load service and

much better than expected

Low Load Operation - GeneralService experience

© MAN Diesel

T/C Cut Out Valve (Compressor side)

Low Load Operation T/C Cut-Out: Service Experience

© MAN Diesel

T/C Cut Out Valve (Turbine side)

Low Load Operation T/C Cut-Out: Service Experience

© MAN Diesel

Indication of Valve Position

Sealing Air for T/C

Local Operation PanelOperation of the T/C Cut-Out Valves

Low Load Operation T/C Cut-Out: Service Experience

© MAN Diesel

0.110.23

0.310.42

0.67

0.96

1.20

1.44

0.16

0.600.69

1.08

1.54

2.34

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0

Bar

Load [%]

Pscav. (3 T/C) [bar]

Pscav. (2 T/C) (New Pmax) [bar]

SFOC Decrease

Load [%]Lower SFOC [g/kWh] ISO

Corr.

10 1.6

25 6.6

30 6.4

40 8.7

50 7.4

65 1.5

Scavenge Air Pressure Increase

Low Load Operation T/C Cut-Out: Service Experience

© MAN Diesel

T/C Cut-Out Feedback: IMO cycle value and type of engine limits potential fuel oil consumption

benefit

Bearing loads and torsional vibration issues must be checked

Turbine out temperature can drop up to 30 degrees

Air flow distribution in scavenge air receiver can appear uneven

Typically 7-8 g/kWh reduction in SFOC between 25% and 50% engine load

Low specific cylinder oil feed rate maintained at low load with increased Pscav (as opposed to the competitor)

Stable cylinder condition maintained at low load with increased Pscav (as

o opposed to the competitor)

Generally positive feed back on low load service with increased Pscav

Low Load Operation – Increased PscavService experience

© MAN Diesel

Low Load Operation – Increased PscavService experience

© MAN Diesel

Low Sulphur Fuel Operation

2010

17

© MAN Diesel 18

Fuels for MAN B&W 2-Stroke Engines

MAN B&W two-stroke engines can operate on:

MGO

MDO

Low S HFO

High S HFO

Biofuel separate fuel spec.

The fuel should be in accordance with:

ISO8217

CIMAC recommendation 21

© MAN Diesel

SOx Scrubbers because of:Cost Difference - HFO vs. Distillates

Leads to more focus on abatement technology such as wet scrubbers

© MAN Diesel

Low Sulphur Fuel Issues: Catfines in Low Sulphur HFO

Cylinder Lubrication on Low Sulphur Fuels

”Design-handles” in Relation to Low Sulphur Fuel Operation

Viscosity Issues

Slow Burning Characteristics of Low Sulphur Fuels

Abatement Technologies

Gas burning 2-Stroke Engines: ME-GI

20

© MAN Diesel

Low Sulphur Fuel Issues: Catfines in Low Sulphur HFO

Cylinder Lubrication on Low Sulphur Fuels

”Design-handles” in Relation to Low Sulphur Fuel Operation

Viscosity Issues

Slow Burning Characteristics of Low Sulphur Fuels

Abatement Technologies

Gas burning 2-Stroke Engines: ME-GI

21

© MAN Diesel

Challenges of Low-sulphur HFO - Catfines

Source: DNVPS database of 1,012 analysis results (from 1 October – 10 November 2007)

A reduction of the low-sulphur content in HFO has seen a corresponding increase in the abrasives content

© MAN Diesel 23

Cat fines in piston ring running surface

© MAN Diesel

Cylinder Condition, abrasive wear

22mm

40mm

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

All o

k

RL

L : Liner change R : Piston ring change RL : Recon liner

L

L L

L

L

L L

L

L

L L/PC

L L

RL

L

L

L

PC

Scuf

fing

60 p

pm fu

el

© MAN Diesel

Cylinder Condition, abrasive wear

12K98MC, Singapore 24th April 2004, 9545 hours

© MAN Diesel

Low Sulphur Fuel Issues: Catfines in Low Sulphur HFO

Cylinder Lubrication on Low Sulphur Fuels

”Design-handles” in Relation to Low Sulphur Fuel Operation

Viscosity Issues

Slow Burning Characteristics of Low Sulphur Fuels

Abatement Technologies

Gas burning 2-Stroke Engines: ME-GI

26

© MAN Diesel

0.000.100.200.300.400.500.600.700.800.901.001.101.201.301.401.501.601.70

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

Sulphur %

Abs

olut

e do

sage

(g/k

Wh)

ACC factor 0.34 g/kWh x S% for Low top land Engines

ACC factor 0.20 g/kWh x S% for High top land Engines

Lower limit set for hydrodynamic reasons

Low Sulphur Fuel Operation

Degree of over additivation

© MAN Diesel

Severe Top-land deposits

Liner polishing / hard contact marks

Small mz on piston rings

How does over-aditivation harm the cylinder condition?

• Over-aditivation lead to mechanical- and chemical bore polish

• Bore polish lead to micro-seizures and latent risk of scuffing

• However, this negative influence from over-aditivation is time based. Over-aditivation may be accepted in 1 – 2 weeks.

• Running more then 1 - 2 weeks in SECA area, it is recommended to change to a lower BN cylinder oil (BN40 – 50 cylinder oil)

28

Low Sulphur Fuel Operation

© MAN Diesel

Cylinder Liner Surface

© MAN Diesel

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

1.10

1.20

1.30

1.40

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5

Sulphur %

Ab

solu

te d

osa

ges

(g/k

Wh

)

New ACC Cylinder Lubrication, feed rate factor as function of BN

SE

CA

Degree of overadditivation using BN40

BN70 ~ 0.20 g/kWh x S%

BN60 ~ 0.23 g/kWh x S%

BN50 ~0.28 g/kWh x S%

BN40 ~ 0.35 g/kWh x S%

BN30 ~ 0.46 g/kWh x S%

BN20 ~ 0.70 g/kWh x S%

CA

RB

Low Sulphur Fuel Operation

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The iron content did not vary very much during the feed rate optimization process

© MAN Diesel

Low Sulphur Fuel Issues: Catfines in Low Sulphur HFO

Cylinder Lubrication on Low Sulphur Fuels

”Design-handles” in Relation to Low Sulphur Fuel Operation

Viscosity Issues

Slow Burning Characteristics of Low Sulphur Fuels

Abatement Technologies

Gas burning 2-Stroke Engines: ME-GI

31

© MAN Diesel

1st ring: Cl-grooves: CPR E4-180 Base material : Vermicular cast, CV1 Hard coating: 0.5mm Cermet (PM2) Run-in coating: 0.1mm AlucoatBottom face: Chrome plating

2nd ring: Left cutBase material : Grey cast, CF5 Run-in coating: 0.3mm AlucoatBottom face: Chrome plating

3rd ring: Right cut Base material : Grey cast, CF5 Run-in coating: 0.3mm Alucoat

4th ring: Left cut Base material : Grey cast, CF5 Hard coating: 0.3mm Cermet(PM2) Run-in coating: 0.1mm

0.1 mm Alucoatrunning-in coating

0.1 mm Alucoatrunning-in coating

Barrel shape

Barrel shape

32

Low Sulphur Fuel Operation

© MAN Diesel

Increased acid sensitivity by increased the cooling, by playing with the cooling bores (number, position and inclination)

33

Low Sulphur Fuel Operation

© MAN Diesel

Low Sulphur Fuel Issues: Catfines in Low Sulphur HFO

Cylinder Lubrication on Low Sulphur Fuels

”Design-handles” in Relation to Low Sulphur Fuel Operation

Viscosity Issues

Slow Burning Characteristics of Low Sulphur Fuels

Abatement Technologies

Gas burning 2-Stroke Engines: ME-GI

34

© MAN Diesel

Marine Fuels

© MAN Diesel

Damage to Fuel Pump Plunger

© MAN Diesel

Lubricity test (ME test rig)

After 600C, 1.4 cSt:

37

© MAN Diesel 38

Low Sulphur Fuel Operation

Diesel Oil Cooling System:

© MAN Diesel 39

Low Sulphur Fuel Operation

© MAN Diesel

Low Sulphur Fuel Issues: Catfines in Low Sulphur HFO

Cylinder Lubrication on Low Sulphur Fuels

”Design-handles” in Relation to Low Sulphur Fuel Operation

Viscosity Issues

Slow Burning Characteristics of Low Sulphur Fuels

Abatement Technologies

Gas burning 2-Stroke Engines: ME-GI

40

© MAN Diesel 41

FIA - 100 FCA

Constant volume spray combustion chamber: Tinit = 800K, Pinit = 45bar

Pressure trace Heat release rate

© MAN Diesel

Measurement of ignition delayon the 4T50MX test engine

Direct comparison of fuels, 100 % engine load

Diesel HFO Santos

© MAN Diesel

Measurement of ignition delayon the 4T50MX test engine

Direct comparison of fuels, 25 % engine load

Diesel HFO Santos

© MAN Diesel

Dear Sirs,

re MV “M… D…"

we received some bad fuel in Oakland /CA . Please see attached analysis reports and comments of DNVPS.

Our vessel is equipped with MAN B&W 9K90MC-C MK6 and with four Aux Eng. 9L28/32H.

Main engine runs so far without any problems, but Aux engines had broken exhaust valves and push rods.

Do you have any official restriction to use this type of fuel (in a way to claim the fuel and to run the aux eng on MDO)?

You assistance in this matter is very welcome. Thanks in advance.

44

Low Sulphur Fuel Operation

© MAN Diesel

Low Sulphur Fuel Issues: Catfines in Low Sulphur HFO

Cylinder Lubrication on Low Sulphur Fuels

”Design-handles” in Relation to Low Sulphur Fuel Operation

Viscosity Issues

Slow Burning Characteristics of Low Sulphur Fuels

Abatement Technologies

Gas burning 2-Stroke Engines: ME-GI

45

© MAN Diesel

SOx Scrubbers because of:Cost Difference - HFO vs. Distillates

Leads to more focus on abatement technology such as wet scrubbers

© MAN Diesel

SOx Scrubber Technology:M/V Tor Ficaria: 9L60MC-C (20 MW)

47

Scrubber Exhaust PipeOld Exhaust Pipe

Scrubber during installation

© MAN Diesel

Low Sulphur Fuel Issues: Catfines in Low Sulphur HFO

Cylinder Lubrication on Low Sulphur Fuels

”Design-handles” in Relation to Low Sulphur Fuel Operation

Viscosity Issues

Slow Burning Characteristics of Low Sulphur Fuels

Abatement Technologies

Gas burning 2-Stroke Engines: ME-GI

48

© MAN Diesel

Exhaust receiver

Cylinder cover

Valve block

Double wall gas pipes

ELVA and ELGI

CO2 reduction 20 %NOX reduction 15 %SOX reduction 90 %Particulate matter reduction 40 %

Simple modifications enable two-stroke gas injection

Proven engine design· High fuel efficiency 50%· High fuel flexibility· High reliability

MAN B&W ME-GI Engines Powered by NG, HFO, MDO and LPG

Presenter
Presentation Notes
changed Particle to Particulate

© MAN Diesel

Alternative Fuel for Container Ships ME-GI Engine for LNG

ME-GI main engineLNG tank

LNG fuel supply system

CO2 (gram per tonne mile) 23% 32% 31%

NOx (gram per tonne mile) 13% 13% 80%

SOx (gram per tonne mile) 92% 92% 94%

Particulate matter (mg per m3) 37% 37% 48%

Reduction withME-GI

Reduction withME-GI + WHR

Reduction withME-GI + WHR + EGR

50

?

© MAN Diesel

<51>

Stig Baungaard JakobsenMarine Low Speed, Operation

Thank you very much for your attention

top related