looking forward: the future of medicaid and the … · american healthcare: progress and promise...

Post on 17-Aug-2020

2 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

LOOKINGFORWARD:THEFUTUREOFMEDICAIDANDTHEHEALTHCARESYSTEM

IanMorrisonPhD

www.ianmorrison.com

Twitter@seccurve

BASICRULESFORFUTURISTS

• Alwaysmakeforecastsaboutthingsthatarefaroff• Makesomanyforecaststhatoneofthemhastoberight• Nevergivepeopleanumberandayearinthesamesentence• Whateveryoudo,don’ttalkaboutelectionsthedayofanelection

OUTLINE

• ElectionsMatter• AmericanHealthcare:ProgressandPromise• LookingForward:

– TheFutureofTheHealthCareSystem– TheFutureofMedicaid

• LeadingChange

ELECTIONSMATTER

BREXITORBLOWOUT?

SCOTLAND,NORTHERNIRELANDANDLONDONVOTEDTOREMAIN

SCOTLAND,NORTHERNIRELANDANDLONDONVOTEDTOREMAIN:NEWSTODONALDTRUMP

OLDER,LESSWELLEDUCATEDANDNATIONALISTICVOTERSMORELIKELYTOBREXIT

THEPARTISANDIVIDEONHEALTHCARE

Source:Harvard/PoliticoOctober2016

VIEWONACAAREBASEDONVIEWSONGOVERNMENTROLEINIMPROVINGHEALTHCARESYSTEM

Source:Harvard/PoliticoOctober2016

WHATSHOULDHAPPENTOACA?

Source:Harvard/PoliticoOctober2016

REALITIESOFAPOLARIZEDAMERICA– 2016AND2018

• MajorchangesinhealthpolicyonlyoccurwhenonepartyholdsthePresidencyandbothHousesofCongress

• SomemajorchangesoccurwhenonepartyholdsthePresidencyandoneHouseofCongress

• Onlysmallincrementalchangesoccurotherwise– withtheexceptionofafewnon-polarizedissues.

CHANGESINACAWITHDEMOCRATWIN

• Morefundsforsubsidiesforall

• Subsidiestoreducehigh-deductibleplans

• Effortstoexpandcoveragetosomeuncoveredgroups

• Morefundsforprevention

• Someinterventioninpharmapricingpolicies

• Reductionoreliminationof“Cadillacinsurancetax”

• Debatesbutnoactionon‘Medicareforall’/Single-Payer– butstate“publicoptions”likely

• Maybe,morestatesexpandMedicaid

MAJORCHANGESINACAWITHREPUBLICANWIN

• MajorstructuralchangestoACA– changedname

• Endofmandates– individual/corporate

• Eliminationorreductionof“Cadillacinsurancetax”

• Establishingstatepre-existingconditionpools

• LessfederalsubsidiesforuninsuredandMedicaid

• MorestatediscretionforMedicaidspending

• Lessinsuranceregulation

AMERICANHEALTHCARE:PROGRESSANDPROMISE

• CoverageExpansion– Obamacare:ExchangesandManagedMedicaid

• PaymentReform– ACOs,MACRA,MedicareAdvantage,ManagedMedicaid,Bundlesandvalue

basedpaymentinprivatesector• VolumetoValue

– PaymentreforminconcertwithshifttoPopulationHealth,ProvidersatRisk• ConsolidationandIntegration

– Plans,healthsystemsandphysiciansmergingandpartneringmoreandmore• DeliveryShifttoAmbulatoryEnvironment

– Outpatient,alternatesiteandretail• ITInfrastructure

– UbiquitousEHRs,Telehealth,BigData,andConsumerfacingapps• EnhancingtheConsumer(andProvider)Experience

– HighDeductiblehealthcareisabluntinstrument– HighbarofserviceinaworldofApple,OpenTable,andUber

BIGDROPINUNINSUREDUNDEROBAMACARE

Date of download: 7/12/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

Decline in Adult Uninsured Rate From 2013 to 2015 vs 2013 Uninsured Rate by StateData are derived from the Gallup-HealthwaysWell-Being Index as reported by Witters and reflect uninsured rates for individuals 18 years or older. Dashed lines reflect the result of an ordinary least squares regression relating the change in the uninsured rate from 2013 to 2015 to the level of the uninsured rate in 2013, run separately for each group of states. The 29 states in which expanded coverage took effect before the end of 2015 were categorized as Medicaid expansion states, and the remaining 21 states were categorized as Medicaid nonexpansion states.

Figure Legend:

BIGDROPINUNINSUREDINMEDICAIDEXPANSIONSTATES

LOOKINGFORWARDATAMERICANHEALTHCARE

10BigStoriesfor2016andBeyond• ServingShallow-PocketedConsumers• Consolidation:GoodorBad?• Employers:StayorGo?• ProviderPricesforPrivateInsurance• SpecialtyPharmaceuticals• MakingVolumetoValueReal• PopulationHealth• PhysicianDiscontent• InnovationatScale• MassiveMedicaid

SERVINGSHALLOW-POCKETEDCONSUMERS

CUMULATIVEINCREASESINHEALTHINSURANCEPREMIUMS,WORKERS’CONTRIBUTIONSTOPREMIUMS,INFLATION,ANDWORKERS’EARNINGS,

1999-2016

98%

160%

213%

92%

167%

242%

24%45%

60%

21%35% 44%

0%

50%

100%

150%

200%

250%

300%

199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016

HealthInsurancePremiums

Workers'ContributiontoPremiums

SOURCE:Kaiser/HRETSurveyofEmployer-SponsoredHealthBenefits,1999-2016.BureauofLaborStatistics,ConsumerPriceIndex,U.S.CityAverageofAnnualInflation(ApriltoApril),1999-2016;BureauofLaborStatistics,SeasonallyAdjustedDatafromtheCurrentEmploymentStatisticsSurvey,1999-2016(ApriltoApril).

$5,277$4,955$4,823$4,565$4,316$4,129$3,997*$3,515$3,354$3,281*$2,973*$2,713$2,661*$2,412*$2,137*$1,787*$1,619$1,543

$12,865$12,591*

$12,011$11,786

$11,429*$10,944*

$9,773$9,860*

$9,325*$8,824

$8,508*$8,167*

$7,289*$6,657*

$5,866*$5,274*

$4,819*$4,247

201620152014201320122011201020092008200720062005200420032002200120001999

WorkerContribution

EmployerContribution

$18,142*

AVERAGEANNUALWORKERANDEMPLOYERCONTRIBUTIONSTOPREMIUMSANDTOTALPREMIUMSFORFAMILYCOVERAGE,1999-2016

*Estimateisstatisticallydifferentfromestimateforthepreviousyearshown(p<.05).

SOURCE:Kaiser/HRETSurveyofEmployer-SponsoredHealthBenefits,1999-2016.

$5,791

$6,438*

$7,061*

$8,003*

$9,068*

$9,950*

$10,880*

$11,480*

$12,106*

$12,680*

$13,375*

$13,770*

$15,073*

$15,745*

$16,351*

$16,834*

$17,545*

16%21%*

35%*40%

46%50% 49%

58%*61% 63% 65%

6% 8% 9%13%*

17%22%*

26% 28%32%

39%*45%

10% 12%*18%*

22%*27%*

31%34%

38%41%

46%51%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

AllSmallFirms(3-199Workers)AllLargeFirms(200orMoreWorkers)AllFirms

*Estimateisstatisticallydifferentfromestimateforthepreviousyearshown(p<.05).NOTE:TheseestimatesincludeworkersenrolledinHDHP/SOsandotherplantypes.Averagegeneralannualhealthplandeductibles forPPOs,POSplans,andHDHP/SOsareforin-networkservices.SOURCE:Kaiser/HRETSurveyofEmployer-SponsoredHealthBenefits,2006-2015.

PERCENTAGEOFCOVEREDWORKERSENROLLEDINAPLANWITHAGENERALANNUALDEDUCTIBLEOF$1,000ORMOREFORSINGLECOVERAGE,BYFIRMSIZE,2006-2015

CUMULATIVEINCREASESINHEALTHINSURANCEPREMIUMS,WORKERS’CONTRIBUTIONSTOPREMIUMS,INFLATION,ANDWORKERS’EARNINGS,1999-2015

88%

138%

203%

75%

158%

221%

20%

42%56%

17%31% 42%

0%

50%

100%

150%

200%

250%

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

HealthInsurancePremiums

Workers'ContributiontoPremiums

SOURCE:Kaiser/HRETSurveyofEmployer-SponsoredHealthBenefits,1999-2015.BureauofLaborStatistics,ConsumerPriceIndex,U.S.CityAverageofAnnualInflation(ApriltoApril),1999-2015;BureauofLaborStatistics,SeasonallyAdjustedDatafromtheCurrentEmploymentStatisticsSurvey,1999-2015(ApriltoApril).

INSUREDADULTSWITHLOWERINCOMESWEREMORELIKELYTOREPORTTHEYHADDELAYEDORAVOIDEDGETTINGCAREBECAUSEOF

THEIRCOPAYMENTSORCOINSURANCE

Note:FPLreferstofederalpovertylevel.Source:TheCommonwealthFundHealthCareAffordabilityTrackingSurvey,September–October2014.

30 28 28 24

46

10 10 12 1021

0

25

50

75

Hadamedicalproblem,butdidnotgotoadoctororclinic

Didnotfillaprescription

Skippedamedicaltest,treatment,orfollow-uprecommendedbyadoctor

Didnotseeaspecialistwhenyouoryour

doctorthoughtyouneededto

seeone

Atleastonecost-related

accessproblem

<200%FPL 200%FPLormore

Insuredadultsages19–64whopayacopaymentorcoinsurance

Percentresponding“yes”

25

DOESSATISFACTIONMATTER?COMPAREDTOWHAT?

2010(A)

2012(B)

2013(C)

2014(D)

2015(E)

2016(F)

77% 79% 84% 81% 79% 77% Satisfactionwithyourinsurancebenefits

Insuranceplanmeetsmy/myfamily’sneedsvery/extremelywell

Satisfactionwithoutofpocketcostsforhealthcareservices

Preparedfor:StrategicHealthPerspectivesBase:AllUSAdults(2010n=2775,2012n=2000,2013n=2501,2014n=2501,2015n=5037,2016n=10011splitsampled)Source:Q600:Howsatisfiedordissatisfiedareyouwitheachofthefollowing?;Q185:Thinkingnowaboutallthedifferentcomponentsofyourhealthinsuranceplan,howwelldoesyourplanmeetyour/yourfamily’shealthneeds? Significancetestedat95%

GeneralImpressionofHealthInsurance(Top-2Box%)

58% 59% 66% 62% 61% 61%

Satisfactionwithoutofpocketcostsforprescriptionmedications 62% 66% 72% 66% 67% 66%

69% 66% 55% 56% Only47%ofExchangebasedplanholdersfeeltheirplanmeetsneedsveryorextremelywell,54%of

Medicaid,61%ofMedicareand56%ofthosewithcommercialplans

However…

F ABDEF

AEF AF

A ABDEF

A A A

ABDEF

AB A A

DEF EF

26

Somechangetowardsthepositive,but1in4consumersremainspowerless

Preparedfor:StrategicHealthPerspectives

Base:AllUSAdults(2014n=2501,2015n=5037,2016n=30052)Source:Q90Howwouldyoudescribeyourfeelingsaboutthehealthcareyoureceivetoday,includinghowmuchyoupayforitandthebenefitsyoureceive?Pleaseselectallthatapply.

CONSUMERSEMOTIONSTOWARDSHEALTHCARETHEYRECEIVENotmuchchangeNationallybutCaliforniansaresignificantlymorepositivein2016

ConsumerEmotionsTowardsHealthcareTheyReceive

9%

17% 19%

37%

28%

15%

23%

11% 14%

6%

20%

13%

32%

24%

17%

31%

14% 18%

9%

21%

15%

34%

24%

14%

26%

12% 17%

141516 141516141516

Empowered Hopeful Relieved Accepting Neutral Resigned/Givenup Powerless Depressed Angry

SHPCONSUMERS2016

Significantoverprioryear

13%

37%

24% 18%

27%

14%

21%

10%

California2016inRed

13%

141516 141516 141516 141516 141516 141516

STRATEGICHEALTHPERSPECTIVES℠

COSTMATTERSBECAUSECONSUMERSPAYMOREOFTHEINCREASE…THISMAKESTHEMFEELMOREPOWERLESS

Preparedfor:StrategicHealthPerspectivesBase:AllUSAdults(n=10011splitsample)Q660.Pleaseindicateifanyofthefollowinghappenedtoyouinthepastyear

28%Receivedabalancebillforcaretheythoughtwascovered

8% Receivedabillforhospitalservices''notinnetwork''eventhoughthe

hospitalwasinnetwork13%EXCHANGE

TOTAL

12% 21%

10% 13% 20% 36%

18% 22%

Resigned/Givenup Powerless Depressed Angry

14% 25%

11% 15% 21% 35%

21% 22%

Resigned/Givenup Powerless Depressed Angry

Havenot

Have

Havenot

Have

California21%

California6%

California13%

28

WHOISBORDERLINE?

9% 21% 15%

34% 24%

14% 26%

12% 17% 7%

15% 7%

15% 14% 30%

48% 31%

41%

Empowered Hopeful Relieved Accepting Neutral Resigned/Givenup Powerless Depressed Angry

40% HaveEmployerbasedinsurance

42% Had3+doctorvisitslastyear

32% Had1+ERvisitslastyear

51%Receivedabalancebillforcaretheythoughtwascovered

GenPop

20% Areuninsured

TheyareNOT onpublicinsurance!

7% HaveMedicaid

29

STRATEGICHEALTHPERSPECTIVES℠

AboveAverage

Average*

384748596066768890909394101111

143149161

181205Lowmonthlypremiums

Hasalowdeductible

Lowcopay fordoctorvisits

Accesstoallmedicalimagingatreasonablecost-sharing/co-pay

Reasonablecostsharing,orcopay levelsforhospitalization

Directaccesstoallspecialists(noreferralneeded)

Includesanextensivenetworkofdoctors

Accesstoleadinghospitalsinmyarea

Coveragefordependents

Coverageformedicalcareatretailclinicsorurgentcarecenters

Lowcopay forgenericdrugs

Accesstocuttingedgemedicaldevicesandmedications

Accesstobrandnamedrugsatreasonablecost-sharing,orco-pay,levels

Providesmewithcashincentivesorrewardsforhealthybehavior

Coverageforawideselectionofbrandnamedrugs

Includesanextensivenetworkofhospitals

Coverageforover-the-countermedications

Accesstospecialtyhospitals(i.e.children’shospitals)

TheinsurancebrandisanameIknowandtrust

LOWOUTOFPOCKETCOSTREMAINSCRITICALINPICKINGINSURANCEConsumersconcernedwithpremiums,deductiblesandcopays…reasonablecostsharingforhospitalservicesandretailcliniccoveragearesurging.

BASE:ALLQUALIFIEDRESPONDENTS(2015n=5037)Q65Respondentsweregivenamaximumdifferencetradeoffexerciseinwhichtheywereforcedtochoosethemostpreferredandleastpreferredplanfeature.*Averageis100,andthescoresrepresentimportancerelativetothataverage.

RelativeImportanceofBenefit

SHPCONSUMER2015

BelowAverage

Wasbelowavg in2014

Evenhigherthan2014

30

STRATEGICHEALTHPERSPECTIVES℠

OUTOFPOCKETCOSTCONCERNSAREBIPARTISAN

Preparedfor:StrategicHealthPerspectivesBase:AllUSAdults(n=10011splitsample),PartyAffiliations(Republicann=2666,Democratn=3328,Independentn=2826)Source:Q60Ifwecouldgreatlyimproveoneofthese,whichONEwouldyouchoose?

Ifwecouldgreatlyimproveoneofthese,whichONEwouldyouchoose?

Reducingtheout-of-pocketcostofhealthcaretotheconsumer

Improvingthequalityofcare

Reducingthecostofhealthcaretothegovernment(andthetaxpayer)

Reducingthenumberofpeoplewithinadequateornohealthinsurance

43%

19%

19%

19%

GenPop

47%

19%

24%

10%

Republican

43%

20%

21%

16%

Independent

39%

18%

15%

28%

Democrat

PartisanDifferencesinHealthCarePriorities

CONSOLIDATION:GOODORBAD?

HEALTHPLANCONSOLIDATIONCONTINUES

• AetnabuysHumanafor$37billionmakinga$115billionrunratecompany

• AnthemclosesonCignain$54billionmakesa$117billionrunratecompany

• NewRivalsfor$154billionUnitedHealthGroup

• Other:– Centene buysHealth

Netfor$6.3billion

PROVIDERCONSOLIDATIONCONTINUES

TheMassiveConsolidationcontinuestoward100-200LargeRegionalSystems

– Doctorsrunningtohospitals– Hospitalsconsolidatingregionally– Roleofprivateequityandforprofitsinconsolidation– Focuson“Essentiality”mayrunintoAttorneyGeneralsandAnti-Trustconcerns

– Therichgetricher:significantreturnstoscaleandtointegration

– Doctorsdiscretioninselectionofspecifictechnologiesandclinicalprotocolswillbeincreasinglyconstrainedbylargemotivatedhealthsystemsthatemploythem

33

EMPLOYERS:STAYORGO?

STRATEGICHEALTHPERSPECTIVES℠

Projectionsfor2016:Widerangeofestimates7.5

9.7 10.3

14.713.0

10.68.5 8.0

6.0 6.0 7.0 6.0 5.4 5.24.1 4.4 4.0

0

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

HealthcaretrendafterplanandcontributionchangesCPI-U

WellsFargo

Mercer

EMPLOYERSARESEEINGAPROLONGEDRESPITEFROMDOUBLE-DIGITPREMIUMINCREASES,BUT THESEARESTILL

RUNNINGATTWOTIMESCPI

SOURCE:Towers-WatsonNBGHAnnualSurveys(2014-2015)

TOWERSWATSON

18% 21% 27%

44% 46%

33% 26%

45%

59%

58% 45%

58% 53%

87% 88%

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2016

FEWEREMPLOYERSARELOOKINGFORANEXIT;CONTINUETOFEELRESPONSIBILITYFOREMPLOYEEHEALTHNEEDS

*AskedonlyofEmployerswith50ormoreemployeesBase:AllEmployerHealthBenefitDecisionMakers(n=340)Q800:Pleaseindicateyourlevelofagreementwiththefollowingstatements.Doyoustronglyagree,somewhatagree,somewhatdisagreeorstronglydisagree?

Company’sPositiononEmployer-SponsoredHealthcare:ProvidingBenefits(Top-2Box%- DescribesCompletely/VeryWell)

Itisourresponsibilitytoensureouremployees'healthneedsaremet

Mycompanyisactivelyexploringwaystogetoutofprovidinghealthinsurancetoouremployees

Employer-basedhealthinsurancewillsoonbecomeathingofthepast

Mycompanyfeelsitisworthittopaythepenaltyassociatedwithnotprovidingemployeehealthbenefitsratherthanprovidinghealthbenefitstoouremployees.*

55%57%58%

54%53%50%50%

53%50%52%49%

52%48%*47%46%44%45%44%

66%67%69%69%68%68%66%

63%65%66%65%63%64%62%61%62%63%61%

62%63%65%63%62%61%60%59%59%60%59%59%58%56%56%55%56%55%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016

AllSmallFirms(3-199Workers)AllLargeFirms(200orMoreWorkers)

PERCENTAGEOFALLWORKERSCOVEREDBYTHEIREMPLOYERS’HEALTHBENEFITS,INFIRMSBOTHOFFERINGANDNOTOFFERINGHEALTHBENEFITS,BYFIRMSIZE,1999-2016

*Estimateisstatisticallydifferentfromestimateforthepreviousyearshown(p<.05).

SOURCE:Kaiser/HRETSurveyofEmployer-SponsoredHealthBenefits,1999-2016.

PROVIDERPRICESFORPRIVATEINSURANCE

MEDICARESPENDINGVERSUSPRIVATESPENDING:ADIFFERENTSTORY

Source:citedinNYTimes,December,15th,2015

PAYMENTTOCOSTRATIO(ILLUSTRATIVE)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Uninsured Medicaid MedicareCommercial PayerDemented Saudi Prince

0.07

0.69 0.89

1.5

3

Payment to Cost Ratio

Source:MorrisonEstimates,inotherwordsagoodguess

PAYMENTTOCOSTRATIO(ILLUSTRATIVE)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

UninsuredMedicaid MedicareExchangeCommercial PayerDemented Saudi Prince

0.07

0.690.89

1.21.5

3Payment to Cost Ratio

Source:MorrisonEstimates,inotherwordsagoodguess

-

+++

+

++

-

-

Copy

righ

t©20

13The

Nielsen

Com

pany

.Con

fiden

tiala

ndproprietary.

42

70%

80%

90%

100%

110%

120%

130%

140%

150%

94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

Private Payer

Medicaid(1)

Medicare(2)

AGGREGATEHOSPITALPAYMENT-TO-COSTRATIOSFORPRIVATEPAYERS,MEDICAREANDMEDICAID,1994– 2014

Source:AnalysisofAmericanHospitalAssociationAnnualSurveydata,2014,forcommunityhospitals.(1) IncludesMedicaidDisproportionateSharepayments.(2) IncludesMedicareDisproportionateSharepayments.

AMERICANHOSPITALASSOCIATION

SPECIALTYPHARMACEUTICALS

STRATEGICHEALTHPERSPECTIVES℠

ENDOF“PATENTCLIFF”ANDEXPLOSIONINSPECIALTYSPENDINGPUTSRXINDUSTRYINTHESPOTLIGHT

HEP-C?TAKEATHREEMONTHLUXURYVACATIONTOEGYPTANDGETYOUREMPLOYERTOPAYFORIT

Thecostofa12weekcourseofSovaldi is$84,000intheUS,$900inEgypt.

84daysattheNileRitzCarltonat$250pernight=$21,00084Daysmealallowanceat$100perday=$8,400BusinessClassAirfarefromSFO =$2,800

TOTAL$32,200

SavingstoYourEmployer$51,800

OptionsBringyourspouse/partner Add$11,20010dayLuxuryNileSpaCruiseforTwoAdd$11,120

TOTAL$54,520

SavingstoYourEmployer$29,480

46

STRATEGICHEALTHPERSPECTIVES℠

MAJORITYCONTINUETOSUPPORTPRICECONTROLS

Whilemoststillfeeltheneedforpricecontrolsforpharmaandhospitals,physicianpricecontrolsignificantlydroppedthisyear

StrategicHealthPerspectives,2016ConsumerResearch,NielsenConsumerInsightsBase:AllUSAdults(n=30052)Source:Q80Howmuchdoyousupportoropposethefollowingideas?

72%

Pricecontrolsorcapsonpharmaceutical/medicaldevicemanufacturers

+0

67%

Pricecontrolsorcapsonhospitals

-1

60%

Pricecontrolsorcapsonphysicianpayment

-10

LevelofSupportforPriceControls(Top2Box:Strongly/SomewhatSupport)

Changefrom2015:

MAKINGVOLUMETOVALUEREAL

Copy

right©

2013

The

Nielsen

Com

pany

.Con

fiden

tiala

ndproprietary.

48

Base:AllHospital-BasedExecs(2016:n=205;2015:n=200;2014:n=202)Q980:Whichofthefollowingbestdescribesyourhospital’s/hospitalsystem’s“riskbearing”strategy?

Hospitalscommittingtoclinicalintegrationforcontractingw/payersbutfullriskonlyforthefew

HospitalRiskManagementStrategy

RISKBEARINGSTRATEGIESVARYCONSIDERABLY

SHPHOSPITALS2016

41%

29%

19%

10% 1%

31% 25% 26%

12% 8%

30% 28% 27%

9% 6%

Noplanstotakeriskbeyondmodestsharedsavingsandpay-for-

performancearrangements

Experimentingw/riskarrangements,butsmall

partofrevenue

Committedtoclinicalintegrationorganizationstrategyforcontracting

w/payers

BuildinganACOmodelthatiscapableoftakingrisksuchasMedicareAdvantageoremployer

directcontracting

Committedtomovingthemajorityofrevenuestofullyatriskwithin5

years

201420152016

THETENSION

Bundles•Moreisstillbetter• Encouragesimprovement•Noteverythingiseasilybundled

• “Screwmeonthebundle,andI’llscrewyouontherest”

PopulationHealth/Risk/AccountableCare

• Frequency•Appropriateness•DeterminantsofHealthcare• TheMutualDisrespectProblem

•SocialWorknotMedicalCare

WHATPOPULATIONLEVELANALYTICSREVEAL

• The5/50Problem– 5%accountfor50%ofspending– 1%accountfor20%– Bottom50%accountforabout2%

• Segmentationofpopulations• Whatyouwillfind…

– HONDAS– BehavioralHealth– EndofLifeCare– Cancer– Frailelderly– SocialWorknotMedicalCare– SpecialtyPharmaceuticals

THETRUCK,THEREFRIGERATORANDTHEBUS

POPULATIONHEALTHMANAGEMENT

• Segmenthigh-riskpopulations• Harnessadvancedanalytics• Usepatientregistriesandmedicalhomes• “Nooutcome,noincome”• Goupstream• Eatyourowncooking• Focusonthewholepopulation• Meetpeopleintheirlives• Emphasizewellnessandprevention• Thinkoutsidethebox• LeverageTechnology• Partner,partner,partner

Notes:GDPreferstogrossdomesticproduct.Source:E.H.BradleyandL.A.Taylor,TheAmericanHealthCareParadox:WhySpendingMoreIsGettingUsLess,PublicAffairs,2013.

HEALTHANDSOCIALCARESPENDINGASAPERCENTAGEOFGDP

12 12 11 11 1216

9 8 9 10 9

21 2120 18 15

9

16 15 11 10 11

0

10

20

30

40

FR SWE SWIZ GER NETH US NOR UK NZ CAN AUS

Healthcare

Percent

7075

8085

90Ex

pect

ed A

ge a

t Dea

th fo

r 40

Year

Old

s in

Yea

rs

0 20 40 60 80 100Household Income Percentile

EXPECTED AGE AT DEATH VS. HOUSEHOLD INCOME PERCENTILEFOR MEN AT AGE 40

Bottom 1%: 72.7 Years

Top 1%: 87.3 Years

New York City

San Francisco

Dallas

Detroit

7075

8085

90Ex

pect

ed A

ge a

t Dea

th fo

r 40

Year

Old

s in

Yea

rs

0 5$30k

10$60k

15$101k

20$683k

Household Income Ventile

RACE-ADJUSTED EXPECTED AGE AT DEATH VS. HOUSEHOLD INCOME FOR MEN IN SELECTED MAJOR CITIES

MASSIVEMEDICAID

MASSIVEMEDICAID

• USMedicaidPopulationedgesoutFranceandtheCongofortop19spotintotalpopulationwith72,650,000enrollees

• USMedicaidspendingedgesoutArgentinafortop25economiesat$540billion

• USMedicaidisbiggerthanWal-Martby$50+billion

MASSIVEMEDICAID

• ChurninginMedicaideligibles andexchangepopulation• Whowilltaketheseenrolleesandwhatwillbethefinancialimpactonprovidersthatdotakethem?

• Medicaidcoverskids,mums,expansionpopulations,supportsthedualeligibleandisthedefaultLTCpolicyforthemiddleclass

• CanwedesignfinanciallysustainabledeliverymodelsforMedicaid?

• Medicaidisdominantforlowincomeandchildren

• Medicaidpopulationhassignificantchurnofapproximately25%

• ExchangePopulationhas40%churnduemainlytochanginglifecircumstances

• Getto65andyouare“homefreeonMedicare”….atleastfornow

• RepublicansmaymoveageofMedicareeligibilityup

• Democratsmaymoveageofeligibility(orbuyin)down

INNOVATIONATSCALE

61

THESCOUTBADGEPROBLEM

PatientCenteredMedicalHome

AccountableCareOrganization

Telehealth Initiative

PatientPortal

ReadmissionReductionProgram

DiabetesDiseaseRegistry

QuantifiedSelfApp

CareBundles

RemotePatientMonitoring

E-Consults

Buthowmany?Andwhatisthedenominator?

STRATEGICHEALTHPERSPECTIVES℠

LOOKINGTO2020

• Pressureonpublicpaymentsourceswillcontinue• PrivatePayerswillnottoleratecostsshiftwillingly• Exchanges,MedicareAdvantage,ManagedMedicaidandConsumer

Engagementamongemployersmakesmarketmoreretail• Longrunthreepayersegments:ManagedMedicaid,HDHP(Exchangeand

Employer)andMedicareAdvantage/ACOincreasepressuretodelivervalue• CareRedesignforhigherperformance

– MigratingBusinessmodeltoRisk– Carecoordinationandmanagementacrossthecontinuumofcare– Alignmentofallphysicians,nursesandcaregiverswiththisprocess– Consumerfacinginnovationindeliveryandtele-health– InnovationatScale

• Governanceandleadershiptosustainitall

THREEFUTURESFORAMERICANHEALTHCARE

• Berwickian Nirvana:LargeintegrateddeliverysystemssuccessfullyinnovateandtransformcaretomeettheTripleAimspurredbymajorpaymentreformbypublicandprivatepayers

• DarwinianConsumerism:Federalsubsidiesandsupportarecutandhealthcareadaptstoaworldofhighdeductiblesandeconomicrationing

• DumbPriceControls:Democraticmajorityadministrationregulatesbudgetsandpriceslockinginmassiveregionalandinstitutionalinequitiesandunjustifiedclinicalvariation

THREEFUTURESFORMEDICAID

• Berwickian Nirvana:– InnovateinpartnershipwithManagedCareOrganizationsandpursuePopulationHealthInitiativeswithlikemindedproviderswhowanttobearrisk

– Combineallsocialspendingintargeted,focusedinitiativestoraisethewellbeingofcommunitiessufferingmultipledeprivationfromlackofeconomicopportunity,poverty,criminaljusticefailures,housingandtransportationinadequacies

• DarwinianConsumerism:IfFederalsubsidiesarecuteither:– BringbackDisproportionateShare– Institute“FairShare”whichmandatesthatproviders(includingphysicians)taketheirfairshareofuninsuredandMedicaid

• DumbPriceControls:Focusonmanagingquality,appropriatenessandoutcomeinaworldofadministeredprices

LEADINGCHANGE

• Maintainandexpandcoverage• Fixthefinancialgotchasforvulnerablepatients• Reducechurnbyextendingeligibilityforacalendaryear

• Consolidateandintegrateforvaluenoteconomicpower

• Innovateatscale• Improvethepatientandproviderexperience• Harnessthenewscience• Leaddon’tfollowtothefuture

top related