literature appraisal effectiveness of therapy

Post on 05-Jan-2016

63 Views

Category:

Documents

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Literature Appraisal Effectiveness of Therapy. Measures of treatment effect. Statistical significance Odds ratio Relative risk Absolute risk reduction Number needed to treat. Measures of treatment effect. Outcome (death) YesNo Control ab Experiment cd. Total. 200. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Literature AppraisalLiterature Appraisal

Effectiveness of TherapyEffectiveness of Therapy

Measures of treatment effect

• Statistical significance• Odds ratio• Relative risk• Absolute risk reduction• Number needed to treat

Measures of treatment effect

Outcome (death)

Yes No

Control a b

Experiment c d

200

Total

200100

100

Total in each group

200100

100

25

Die

10

Total in each group

After 1 year

200100

100

25 (75)

Die

10 (90)

(Survive)Total in each group

+

+

After 1 year

Risk & Relative Risk

200100

100

25 (75)

Die

10 (90)

(Survive) Risk? (a proportion)

What is the Total in each group

+

+

After 1 year

200100

100

25 (75)

Die

10 (90)

(Survive) RiskTotal in each group

+

+

After 1 year

200100

100

25 (75)

Die

10 (90)

(Survive) RiskTotal in each group

+

+

After 1 year

200100

100

25 (75)

Die

10 (90)

(Survive) RiskTotal in each group

+

+

After 1 year

200100

100

25 (75)

Die

10 (90)

(Survive) Risk

0.2525%

+

+

After 1 year

200100

100

25 (75)

Die

10 (90)

(Survive) Risk

0.25 25%

+

+

After 1 year

200100

100

25 (75)

Die

10 (90)

(Survive) Risk

0.25 25%

0.110%+

+

200100

100

25 (75)

Die

10 (90)

(Survive) Risk

0.25 25%

0.1 10%+

+

200100

100

25 (75)

Die

10 (90)

(Survive) Risk

Risk ratio or Relative risk (RR) =

+

+ 0.25 25%

0.1 10%

200100

100

25 (75)

Die

10 (90)

(Survive) Risk

Risk ratio or Relative risk (RR) =

+

+ 0.25 25%

0.1 10%

200100

100

25 (75)

Die

10 (90)

(Survive) Risk

Risk ratio or Relative risk (RR) =

2.5

+

+ 0.25 25%

0.1 10%

Odds & Odds Ratio

Odds

• The ratio between the amounts staked by parties in a bet, based on the expected probability either way.

• The balance of advantage or superiority.

200100

100

25 (75)

Die

10 (90)

(Survive) Risk

0.25

0.1

Odds?What about

+

+

200100

100

25 (75)

Die

(90)

(Survive) Risk

0.25

0.1

Odds

10 +

+

200100

100

25 (75)

Die

(90)

(Survive) Risk

0.25

0.1

Odds

10

1to3

+

+

200100

100

25 (75)

Die

10 (90)

(Survive) Risk

0.25

0.1

Odds

1to3

+

+

200100

100

25 (75)

Die

10 (90)

(Survive) Risk

0.25

0.1

Odds

1to3

1to9+

+

200100

100

25 (75)

Die

10 (90)

(Survive) Risk

0.25

0.1

Odds

1to3

1to9+

+

200100

100

25 (75)

Die

10 (90)

(Survive) Risk

0.25

0.1

Odds

1to3

1to9

Odds Ratio (O.R.) =

+

+

200100

100

25 (75)

Die

10 (90)

(Survive) Risk

0.25

0.1

Odds

1to3

1to9

Odds Ratio (O.R.) =

+

+

200100

100

25 (75)

Die

10 (90)

(Survive) Risk

0.25

0.1

Odds

1to3

1to9

Odds Ratio (O.R.) =

+

+

3

200100

100

25 (75)

Die

10 (90)

(Survive) Risk

0.25

0.1

Odds

1to3

1to9

3

Odds Ratio (O.R.) =

+

+

Risk ratio or Relative risk (RR) =

2.5

Measures of treatment effect influence clinicians decisions

• Clinicians:– more inclined to treat if the results are

presented as relative risk

– less inclined to treat if the results are presented as absolute risk reduction

Forrow et al. Am J Med 1992;92:121

• Control group event rate (CER) = Deaths / Controls

• Experiment group event rate (EER)

= Deaths / Treated

Absolute risk reduction (difference)

ARR = CER - EER

Absolute Risk Reduction

200100

100

25

Die

10

Risk

0.25 25%

0.110%

Absolute Risk Reduction

(ARR) =

CER

EER

200100

100

25

Die

10

Risk

0.2525%

0.110%

Absolute Risk Reduction

(ARR) =0.15 15%

Number Needed to Treat

NNT

Clinical value of measures of treatment effect

Number Needed To Treat• The odds ratio etc. not easy to understand,

especially for patients.

• The number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent an adverse event is a more clinically relevant measure of the consequences of treatment

Sackett DL. EBM 1996; 1: 164-6

Sinclair JC. J Clin Epidemiol 1994; 47: 881-9

Number Need to Treat (NNT)

Out of 100 patients treated 10 died compared to 25 in the placebo group

and 15 extra survived.

Therefore:

To get 1 more patient to survive, 6.7 (100/15) have to be treated.

100/15

1/ 0.15

NNT = 1/ ARR

200100

100

25

Die

10

Risk

0.2525%

0.110%

Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) =

0.1515%

NNT=1/ARR=1/0.15=

6.7

Q.E.D.

MAGPIEOf the patients treated (5015) 40 fitted compared to 96 in the placebo group (5055)

In % Mg 0.8% vs Placebo 1.9%

Therefore: ARR 1.8 – 0.8 = 1.1% (11 per 1000)

To get 1 more patient to survive, 91 (100/1.1) have to be treated. = NNT

top related