lexical and phonological factors affecting accuracy of ... web viewphone: 319-335-6951 ... or ended...
Post on 06-Feb-2018
217 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Quantifying the relative contributions of lexical and phonological factors to regular past
tense accuracy
Amanda J. Owen Van Hornea,b & Melanie Greenc
aDept. of Communication Sciences & Disorders
bMember, DeLTA Center
University of Iowa
cWaukegan Public School District 60, Waukegan, IL
Keywords: Past tense, telicity, lexical frequency, target selection, consonant cluster, child
language, SLI
Contact Information: Amanda J. Owen Van Horne, 121 A SHC, Dept. of Communication
Sciences & Disorders, 400 Hawkins Dr., University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242. Phone: 319-
335-6951. Email: amanda-owen-vanhorne@uiowa.edu
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 1
Declaration of Interest
The authors have no real or perceived conflicts of interest.
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 2
Abstract
Background. Telicity, frequency of the inflected form, and stem final phonemes have all been
shown to influence past tense, but it is not known what the relative contribution of each of these
factors is, which limits the ability of clinicians to select therapy targets (Weiler, 2013).
Aims. This study aimed to quantify the influence of lexical and phonological factors on the
production of past tense by school age children with SLI.
Methods & Procedures. Archival elicited production data from children with SLI between the
ages of 6 and 9 and their typically-developing age- and MLU-matched peers were reanalyzed for
use of simple regular past tense -ed. Past tense accuracy was predicted using measures of telicity,
frequency of the verb in its inflected form and in all of its forms, and properties of the final
consonant of the verb stem.
Outcomes & Results. All of the factors under consideration contributed to predicting use of past
tense. All children were highly accurate within facilitative contexts. All children were less
accurate when verbs were atelic, rarely heard in the past tense, or ended in a word final obstruent
or alveolar consonant. Being diagnosed with SLI affected overall accuracy rates but did not
influence how facilitative a given factor was
Conclusions & Implications. Some factors, e.g., telicity, that have been believed to be useful
only when children are first discovering past tense appear to be influential in later years.
Clinicians should consider the properties of the target words when they select stimuli for use in
therapy. These data provide a means for balancing the relative influence of a variety of factors as
clinicians attempt to select past tense targets.
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 3
Clinicians working with children with language impairments are repeatedly faced with
the question of how to effectively select stimuli for use in teaching a linguistic target.
Appropriate target selection has the potential to enhance a client’s success in therapy and to
improve the efficacy of intervention. However, the process of selecting targets is not clear and
the primary guidance comes from expert opinion (Weiler, 2013; Crystal, 1985) rather than data.
Even a clinician who is well versed in the literature and knows that completed-ness of the event
(Leonard, Deevy, Kurtz, Krantz Chorev, Owen, Polite, Elam, & Finneran, 2007b), past tense
frequency (Marchman, Wulfeck, & Ellis Weismer, 1999; Oetting & Horohov, 1997), and
phonological complexity (Leonard, Davis & Deevy, 2007a; Marshall & van der Lely, 2006,
2007;) influence accuracy may still struggle to balance these factors in order to select the best
verbs for use in therapy. Should she select a verb like walk because it is frequently heard in the
past tense even though it ends in the consonant cluster /kt/ and may not have a clear end point?
Or a word like answer that is somewhat abstract and yet receives high telicity ratings and has an
easy to produce word ending? There is limited evidence in the literature to guide a clinician who
needs to balance competing influences on past tense accuracy.
This paper aims to quantify the relative contribution of factors that influence past tense
accuracy to aid clinicians in selecting therapy targets. Upon evaluating these factors, we obtain a
rank ordering of verbs from ‘easy’ to ‘hard’, which can be used to facilitate target selection in
assessment and intervention programs. A secondary goal is to determine whether these factors
are equally influential across two groups of typically-developing (TD) children and a group of
children with specific language impairment (SLI). Information about how these factors interact
with the individual child or with diagnostic group may further influence clinicians’ selection of
verb targets.
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 4
Variability in Verb Morphology
Lexical factors - Frequency and Telicity
The role of frequency on the accuracy of inflection is well established across morphemes,
including plural (Rice & Oetting, 1993) and past tense (Marchman, et al., 1999; Oetting &
Horohov, 1997). In these studies, children with SLI had greater difficulty inflecting low
frequency words than their peers, even when the confound between frequency and regularity was
removed. Frequency influences morphological production across the lifespan (Wulff, Ellis,
Roemer, Bardovi-Harlig, & LeBlanc, 2009), with some groups being more sensitive to frequency
effects than others (Blom & Paradis, 2013). Frequency can be characterized in two ways –
overall frequency of the lexical item and frequency of the inflected form. Although most studies
have relied on frequency of the inflected form (Marchman, et al.,1999; Oetting & Horohov,
1997), overall frequency is more readily available and intuitive. It would be helpful if clinicians
knew whether these two values could be used interchangeably or if they should only rely on one
value.
In contrast, lexical aspect has primarily been studied in young children and appears to be
a way that children discover tense marking. Aspect refers to the nature of an event in time
(Vendler, 1957), including whether it is habitual, completed, ongoing, iterative, etc. In this paper
we will primarily be concerned with telic events, which are events that have a clear endpoint, and
with atelic events, which are events that are ongoing in nature. Initially, TD 2-year-olds produce
simple past markers with telic events (e.g., - he ate a sandwich; he died yesterday) and past
progressive markers with atelic events (e.g., - he was eating dinner; he’s been dying all week
long) (Bloom, Lifter, & Hafitz, 1980; Johnson & Fey, 2006; Shirai & Andersen, 1995). As
illustrated in the preceding sentences, most verbs can be grammatically realized as either telic or
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 5
atelic events, but some events are more naturally realized as a completed event while others are
more naturally ongoing.
In addition to influencing emergence of past tense, lexical aspect influences the
likelihood that young children will choose a particular form of inflection. TD 3- to 4-year-old
children were more likely to produce the simple past when the elicitation context used a
prototypically telic event (e.g., drop, close) than when it used a non-prototypically telic event
(e.g., rake, dance; Leonard, et al., 2007b). However children with SLI were less sensitive than
their TD peers to this contrast (Leonard, et al., 2007b), using past tense equally often for
prototypically telic and atelic events. Unsurprisingly, verbs that are highly telic are more likely
to be heard in the past tense, introducing a confound between frequency and telicity. Which
factor is more important and should receive more attention from clinicians? Most of the research
on the influence of telicity has been carried out with preschoolers and framed as a means of
children “bootstrapping” into the paradigm. This study examines older children and we ask
whether aspectual factors continue to influence production during the school years over and
above the contribution of frequency.
Phonological Factors
Phonological factors that influence accurate past tense production have received
especially close examination in English due to the debate over how individuals maintain the
regular/irregular distinction. However, even when the question is restricted to regular past tense,
phonology seems influential, with general agreement that more complex articulatory contexts are
more difficult (Leonard, et al., 2007a; Marshall & van der Lely, 2006; Marchman et al., 1999;
Marshall & van der Lely, 2007; Oetting & Horohov, 1997). Oetting and Horohov (1997) found
that children with SLI and their TD peers were both more accurate when a verb ended in a liquid
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 6
or a vowel and were equally less accurate when the word ended in a consonant. Marshall and van
der Lely (2007) observed an influence only when the addition of the past tense formed a
consonant cluster. Marchman et al., (1999) suggested that it is not any consonant combination
that is difficult, but rather that children with SLI were more likely than their peers to omit past
tense forms when the stem ended in [t] or [d]. They attribute this to problems with understanding
the past tense pattern, but relate it to articulatory changes as well.
Relationship between Lexical and Phonological Factors
There is preliminary evidence that both phonological and lexical factors contribute to past
tense accuracy, at least in TD children (Johnson & Morris, 2007). Johnson and Morris (2007)
elicited past tense forms from TD 2-year-olds using verbs that ended in an obstruent (e.g., walk,
jump) or a non-obstruent (e.g., roll, chew). Using elicitation scenarios that either had a clear
endpoint (telic – chewed up) or were ongoing (atelic – chewed all day), they observed that
children’s overall accuracy dropped when both the phonological and aspectual cues were non-
facilitative (see Table 5b). There was no difference in performance between 2 facilitative factors
or 1 facilitative and 1 non-facilitative factor. In contrast, the results from a single child with SLI
suggested that combinations of facilitative and non-facilitative factors might influence
performance different in children with language impairment. This child was 100% accurate for
telic items with a non-obstruent coda, 33% accurate when either one of those factors was present
and 0% accurate when neither factor applied. As only one child with SLI was studied, it is not
clear whether the more graded influences generalize to a larger group of children with SLI.
To summarize, variable production of past tense seems to be mediated by the frequency,
aspectual and phonological properties of the individual lexical item being inflected. This study
aimed to quantify the relative contributions of lexical and phonological factors to the production
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 7
of simple regular past tense inflection. We first identified appropriate predictors for each factor
of interest (frequency, telicity, phonology) and then we considered how predictions of accuracy
are altered when these factors are combined. In each case we were also concerned with how each
factor interacts with diagnostic group.
Methods
Data Collection
Participants
The children studied here were initially recruited for participation in a study of complex
syntax production (Owen, 2010). All research reported below was completed in accordance with
the ethical guidelines for human subjects research as described in the Belmont report and
required by the National Institutes of Health and the Institutional Review Board at the University
of Iowa. Fourteen children with SLI (5;0-8;1) and 24 TD children participated in Owen (2010),
providing the data reanalyzed in this study. The TD children were divided into 2 groups: 13 of
the TD children were matched within 3 months of age to a child with SLI; 11 of the TD children
were 4-year-olds who were matched within 5 raw score points on the Expressive Vocabulary
Test (EVT, Williams, 1997) and within .35 words on MLU in a 100-utterance language sample
to a child with SLI.
The children in the SLI group met at least two of the following four criteria: a) enrolled
in intervention within the last 12 months; b) scored below the 10th percentile on the Structured
Photographic Expressive Language Test – 2nd edition (SPELT-II; Werner & Kresheck, 1983); c)
scored below a standard score of 7 on the nonword repetition subtest of the NEPSY (Kemp,
Korkman, & Kirk, 1998); d) obtained a composite standard score at or below 85 on the Test of
Narrative Language (TNL, Gillam & Pearson, 2004). TD children had no history of intervention
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 8
and scored at or above the typical range on all of the speech and language measures described
above. All children scored above 83 on the Kaufman Basic Intelligence Test-II, Matrices Subtest,
(KBIT-II, Kaufman & Kaufman, 2004) and passed a hearing screening. Table 1 summarizes
relevant information about the participants’ assessment information.
Stimuli
The data for this study are the verbs produced in 3 complex syntax elicitation tasks.
These data are particularly relevant because verbs were repeated across the different elicitation
conditions, yielding multiple productions of the same verb for each child, allowing examination
of the contribution of the verb to accuracy. In the original study, three different types of
sentences were chosen as targets: 1) coordinated clauses (e.g., Ernie hopped and Elmo kicked the
ball), 2) a main clause and a finite complement clause (e.g., Ratty guessed that Elmo kicked the
ball), and 3) a main clause and a temporal adverbial clause (e.g., The aliens whistled when
Minnie kicked the ball). Thirty-six (36) items were constructed for each sentence type. The
protocols for eliciting the stimuli and the design of the sentences are summarized in Owen
(2010). Example scenarios are given in Appendix A.
All of the sentences consisted of a main clause made up of a subject and a verb, followed
by another finite clause. The coordinate and adverbial conditions used the same regular action
verbs in the first clause, while the complement condition used mental and communication verbs.
The verb figured out was the only verb + particle included in the elicitation items and it was
discarded from analyses. The 36 verbs (18 regular) in the second clause of each sentence type
were repeated 3 times – once in each sentence condition. Thus, 82 different verbs were elicited
via 108 different sentences. Given our focus on regular verbs, it is worth pointing out that only
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 9
60 of these verbs were regular and 21 were irregular. Of the 60 regular verbs, one verb was
elicited 6 times, 23 were elicited 3 times, and 36 were elicited twice. (See Appendix B).
Procedures
For each sentence type, children watched a short puppet show enactment and then a
question prompt was posed (see Appendix A for example elicitation scenarios and Owen, 2010
for a full description of the elicitation methods). The experimenter provided the first word of the
first clause and encouraged the child to complete the rest of the sentence. If a child did not
respond or provided an incomplete response, the examiner asked the child to say the whole
sentence. If the child still did not produce a full response, the examiner provided the first clause
of the sentence and again asked the child to complete the sentence. All responses were audio-
recorded and transcribed, using the on-line written record as a guide. Transcription reliability
was computed for nine transcripts (three from each group) for word level accuracy (mean: 90%;
range: 75-100%) and for tense marking (mean: 93% range: 81-100%). Table 2 shows percent
correct use of past tense marking using the response inclusion and scoring criteria from Owen,
2010. Children in all three groups were neither at floor nor at ceiling; the target sentences were
sufficiently difficult for all three groups of children.
Data Reduction
Outcome Variables
Unlike the prior study’s focus on the influence of sentence-level factors such as clausal
complexity, here we focus on word-level factors. Therefore, one-clause (truncated) productions
were included here to maximize the number of responses available for analysis. 8208 tokens
were potentially available for analysis. Of these, 823 were 1-clause responses that were not
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 10
analyzed in Owen (2010). A total of 4558 responses were discarded due to being irregular verbs
(inflected or bare, N = 2175), non-target verbs (N = 920), using non-simple past inflections (e.g.,
past progressive, simple present tense, N=836) or being unintelligible (N = 652). Verbs that were
not the target for that item, but matched another target were retained (N=413). Thus the analyses
involved 3625 tokens of 60 verb types as shown in Appendix B.
Predictor Variables
Lexical frequency.
Three lexical frequency variables were calculated from the parental lexical frequency
information in the CHILDES database (MacWhinney, 2000): Lemma Frequency, Past
Frequency and Stem Frequency. This database was selected because it is freely available,
however this database does not differentiate between the noun and verb forms of the target item
(e.g., take a walk, we walk around) or between participial forms (I walked, he has walked),
which influenced the frequency counts below. One was added to all sums to eliminate zeros from
the data set and all frequency variables were log transformed to normalize their distribution.
Lemma Frequency was the sum of frequency information for all forms of the word. For example,
for walk, a regular verb, the frequencies of walk, walked, walks, and walking were summed. Past
Frequency only included correct productions of the simple past form (e.g., walked). Participial
forms were indistinguishable from simple past in CHILDES (e.g., the dog got walked; he has
walked home; he walked). Stem Frequency consisted of the uninflected stem forms, whether
correctly produced (e.g., I walk), a noun form (the walk) or bare due to omission (e.g., he walk).
Telicity.
Most previous studies have used lists of activity/achievement verbs to construct
categories of prototypically telic and atelic verbs. As a study of archival data, this was not
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 11
possible here. Instead, we used adult ratings of the verbs situated within the elicitation scenarios.
Thus, 7 adults read the elicitation scenarios and rated them on a scale of 1-4 with regard to the
clearness of the endpoint. They were instructed to read the elicitation script and determine
whether the verb was ongoing (1) or completed (4). All 7 raters used the full rating scale, but
means (range:2.2-3.4) and standard deviations (.92-1.38) varied across raters. To correct for
differences in use of the scale, each rater’s scores were normalized and then averaged to yield a
single score for each verb. As seen in appendix C, ratings were consistent with expectations at
the extreme values, providing ecological validation of the adult ratings. See Appendix C.
Articulatory complexity1.
The articulatory difficulty of the child's production was determined by the characteristics
of the final consonants. For the manner variable, words that ended in [b, d, ɡ, p, t, k, θ, f, s, ʃ, ð,
v, z, ʒ, ʤ, ʧ] were coded as obstruents; words ending in other sounds were coded as non-
obstruent.
Place of production was also considered. Homo-organic production of the final consonant
of the stem and the past tense inflection depresses accuracy (Marchman, et al., 1999). Thus we
also coded verbs as ending in alveolar/ alveo-palatal place of articulation for [d, t, s, ʃ, z, ʒ, ʤ, ʧ,
j, r, l, n] or other.
1 Although we would hypothesize that the phonotactic probability of the inflected forms would be an excellent potential predictor of accuracy, this measure is not reported for two reasons. First, neither the Vitevitch and Luce (2004) nor the Storkel and Hoover (2010) databases incorporate inflected forms into their dictionaries. The results seemed misleading in terms of the weightings for the probability of those phoneme combinations or phonemes in that position. Even selecting only the last syllable or coda of the inflected word yielded unusual frequency metrics since attested – indeed frequent - combinations were not found in the database. Second, adding an inflection makes the stem longer, shifting the word to a more or less common length and influencing the way that the length corrections were carried out (see Storkel, 2004). Thus the length normalization procedure does not work properly for words that are inflected forms. Following a reviewer’s suggestion, we removed phonotactic probability entirely rather than report nonsignificant results when the metrics are in question.
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 12
Statistical Approach
Following Baayen, Davidson, and Bates (2008) and Jaeger (2008), we adopted a mixed
model logistic regression as our statistical approach. Although this approach is less transparent
than ANOVA or simple linear regression, it is the best means of answering our question about
verb ranking for three reasons: it weights the reliability of a factor based on how many data
points are available; it allows one to carry out by-item and by-subject analyses simultaneously;
and the binomial distribution closely mirrors the underlying distribution of the data since we
recorded past tense as either correct (1) or omitted (0). Given that this approach is new and can
be difficult to interpret, the technical details are reported for the interested reader followed by
more narrative interpretations aimed at a clinical audience in the discussion sections.
Mixed model regression includes both random and fixed effects. The inclusion of random
effects mathematically adjusts the intercepts for each child and verb. For instance, the random
intercept for child rightly assumes that each child has a different mean accuracy level. If we
mathematically accommodate these differences, the fixed effects will act in similar ways across
each child. The use of random slopes assumes that a factor (in this case, elicitation condition)
may influence each child’s production in systematic but non-identical ways. We initially selected
an appropriate random effects structure, then we developed models for each of our main
variables of interest and confirmed that the random effect structure remained appropriate.
Finally, we combined all the variables of interest into a final model that allows interpretation of
the relative influence of each variable. At each point, models with random effects were
compared to models without random effects and checked for goodness of fit via chi-squared
analyses. Given the widely differing scales used for our variables, results are reported for
centered and scaled variables to make comparison across parameter estimates more
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 13
straightforward. This is consistent with the goal of determining the relative contribution of each
variable on past tense accuracy. Categorical variables were contrast coded and centered prior to
scaling.
Results
The initial reduced model included both random and fixed factors related to the subject
and the verb. In addition to the random effects for subject described above, a random slope for
elicitation condition and a random intercept for verb were also supported by chi-squared tests for
goodness of fit (X2 (5) =184.40, p < 0.0001). This random effects structure assumes that the three
different elicitation conditions may have influenced each child’s accuracy in slightly different
ways and accounts for that variance and is consistent with the findings of Owen (2010), which
found that children were more accurate in the coordinate condition and in the first clause of the
utterance. Like subject, each verb also influenced the mean accuracy level in a slightly different
way. The fixed factor in the reduced model was group (age, MLU, SLI) with the age-matched
group set as the reference variable. As expected, both the MLU-matched group (p=.055) and the
SLI group (p<.0001) were more likely to omit regular past tense than the age-matched group.
We tested whether lexical frequency measures or telicity ratings accounted for past tense
production by TD children and children with SLI, over and above the contributions of group. All
lexical frequency variables were highly inter-correlated (see Table 3). Therefore, Past
Frequency, the variable most highly related to the outcomes, was entered first into the model,
significantly improving model fit over the reduced model (X2 (3) =12.88, p = 0.0049). Then
Lemma Frequency and Stem Frequency were each regressed against Past Frequency and the
residual values were entered2. The residuals of Lemma Frequency resulted in slightly lower log
2 Regressing one variable (e.g., Lemma Frequency) against another variable (e.g., Past Frequency) tells you about the relationship between these two variables. The residuals are a measure of the error in the model. Entering the residuals essentially provides information about
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 14
likelihood values in the model, X2 (3) =8.48, p= 0.037. Addition of Stem Frequency residuals did
not further improve model fit (p>.50). We also considered whether simply entering the ratio of
Past Frequency to Lemma Frequency was as good a predictor as entering the Past Frequency
and the residuals of Lemma Frequency separately, but this was not the case. Testing for
interactions demonstrated that only the residuals for Lemma Frequency interacted with group
(p<.002). Figure 1 shows the influence of the Past Frequency and Lemma Frequency on the
outcomes for each group set to the same scale to allow for easy comparison.
Telicity ratings were also highly correlated with the Past Frequency variable. Thus, we
regressed telicity against the two frequency predictors and assessed whether the residuals
contributed significantly to the outcomes. Telicity residuals were a significant predictor and did
not interact with group variables (p > .50). Taken together this suggests that telicity contributes
over and above frequency in predicting past tense accuracy.
Finally the articulatory factors (obstruent/non-obnstruent and alveolar/non-alveolar)
were entered into a model with lexical factors, reassessed for fit, and checked for interactions
with diagnostic group. The lexical factors improved model fit over the phonological factors alone
(X2(3) = 34.11, p<.0001) and vice versa (X2(6) = 29.94, p<.0001). The final model is reported in
Table 4. As expected, words that ended in obstruent consonants (nasals, fricatives, affricates,
and stops) were less accurate than words that ended in sonorants (liquids, glides, and vowels),
reflecting problems forming consonant clusters (Marshall & van der Lely, 2007). Words ending
in alveolars were also difficult to a similar degree, as has been previously reported by Marchman
et al., (1999). These results are illustrated in Figure 2. The MLU-matched group was less
influenced by the presence of a word final obstruent than the other two groups (p =.03), but still
did not produce these at the same level of accuracy as they did words ending in sonorants.
how surprised you should be by the Lemma Frequency given that you know Past Frequency.
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 15
The primary goal of this study was to compare the relative contribution of the various
factors. Figure 3 provides a means of visually comparing the magnitude of the standardized
coefficients, setting the age-matched group’s performance as the intercept. As the reader can see,
the phonological factors and lexical frequency/telicity factors both account for similar sized
changes in the child’s rate of inflection, but in opposite directions (phono: β = -0.72; freq: β =
+0.68). Although children with SLI still start at a lower rate of inflection (group: β = -1.16), the
lack of interactions indicates that the facilitative effects of frequency and telicity (β = +0.77) and
phonology (β = -0.63) are not significantly different than that of the age-matched group. For an
MLU-matched child the effect of phonology is less than that observed for an age-matched child,
and the influence of lexical frequency and telicity variables is greater (phono: β = -0.58; freq: = β
= +0.87).
Discussion
Although prior work has independently considered the influence of word familiarity, past
frequency, telicity, and stem-final phonology on past tense accuracy, we are not aware of work
that has considered how these factors may together contribute to past tense accuracy. Although
many of these variables are inter-related, each made unique contributions to the prediction of
past tense use, suggesting that all variables must be given equal consideration in selection of
target words for teaching the past tense. A key contribution of this study is that past tense
frequency and telicity are not interchangeable variables and that these variables continue to
influence accuracy well beyond the initial emergence of past tense markers.
Telicity and Past Frequency make unique contributions to accuracy
The unique contributions of telicity and Past Frequency are an important point to bear in
mind. Even though adults’ intuitions about the “completed-ness” of events is highly related to
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 16
the frequency with which these words are produced in past tense (r=.30; p=.02), both factors
separately contribute to the likelihood that past tense will be used by children to a comparable
degree. This finding is consistent with the work of Wulff and colleagues (2009). Because telicity
was entered as a residual of the frequency based information, we can be confident that the
contribution of telicity is over and above how often completed events are heard in the past tense.
Thus we might assume that telicity might contribute even more if we did not correct for the
contribution of frequency. It is possible that our selection of predictors influenced our outcomes.
Telicity was rated after the fact by adults reading the scripts used by experimenters, not by
watching enactments. More valid ratings would have entailed videotaped observations of the
events as they were enacted for children. Both the Johnson and Fey (2006) and Leonard et al.,
(2007b) studies used verb events specifically designed to be clearly telic or atelic which
enhances the differences in these verb types.
Prior work has suggested that telicity is primarily useful for helping children ‘crack into’
the tense system (e.g., Leonard et al., 2007b). Our results extend the contribution of event
semantics into older ages and a continuum of telicity. Telicity is a persistent influence on the use
of regular past tense beyond ages 2 to 3 for TD children and 4 to 6 for children with SLI
(Johnson & Fey, 2006; Johnson & Morris, 2007; Leonard, et al., 2007b). Telic events may not
just be a way to bootstrap into the inflection system, only to be superseded by frequency later on.
Instead they may serve as persistent cues, enhancing the use of past tense across the lifespan
(Wulff et al., 2009). Clinicians may be able to promote accuracy by selecting highly telic events
for use in intervention or presenting ambiguous verbs in ways that make them appear more telic
(see Appendix C).
The frequency of the inflected form is a well-examined factor (Marchman et al., 1999;
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 17
Oetting & Horohov, 1997), thus it should not come as a surprise that Past Frequency was a
significant predictor of past tense accuracy. While our results are generally in agreement with
those of Marchman et al., (1999) in finding that verb frequency influenced all groups similarly,
we differ from Oetting and Horohov (1997) who found that group differences were only apparent
for verbs that were rarely inflected/low frequency forms. We see that frequency of the inflected
form affects all groups similarly across the entire range of frequency, highlighting the variable as
one worthy of attention when selecting verbs for intervention.
The residuals of lemma frequency were also a significant predictor, altering the pattern of
responses for the MLU-matched group as compared to the age-matched group. As seen in Figure
1, for the MLU matched children, positive residual values are associated with increased
accuracy, suggesting that greater familiarity with the word form, in any form, is associated with
greater accuracy. Because the beta coefficients are scaled (see Figure 3), we can compare them
directly and we see that Past Frequency contributes approximately 4 times more than Lemma
Frequency to past accuracy for this group. For the age and SLI groups, lemma frequency at first
appears to work in competition with the past frequency, reducing accuracy (βage = -0.13; βsli = -
0.04). The beta coefficient suggests that words that are commonly heard in alternative forms are
less likely to be inflected with the regular past tense inflection, but this effect is not reliable (p-
values of .12 to .19) and should not be over-interpreted.
The fact that the ratio of Past Frequency to Lemma Frequency could not replace Past
Frequency is consistent with the findings of Nicoladis and colleagues (2007) who found that
both type and token frequency of the inflected forms uniquely influenced production of past
tense by bilingual children. A minimum number of exposures to the target form seemed to be
required in their study; greater rates of exposure led to more accurate production. Others
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 18
examining second language learners have also observed that Past Frequency and Lemma
Frequency separately contribute to accuracy levels (Blom & Paradis, 2013). Second language
learners may have less exposure to English and smaller verb vocabularies, like our MLU-
matched group. This would suggest that clinicians should ensure minimal familiarity with target
words but should still select words primarily on the basis of their frequency in the inflected form
rather than their overall frequency.
Application of phonological and lexical variables to real words
For the age-matched children and for the children with SLI, the lexical and phonological
coefficients were comparable in magnitude and could either enhance or reduce accuracy. From a
practical standpoint, this is easiest to understand when particular words are used as examples.
Take for instance the words close and kiss, that have high telicity ratings. In these cases, the
beneficial effect of telicity cancels out the potentially detrimental effect of that word ending in /s/
or /z/. Close is slightly more telic and substantially more common in the past tense form and thus
is more accurate than kiss. Contrast this with play another frequently correct word. It is highly
accurate primarily because it is phonologically simple, rather than because it has high telicity or
past frequency ratings. Although many of the example words are action verbs, mental/
communication verbs can also lead to highly accurate responses. Verbs like answer and
remember were rated as more telic, had average past tense frequency values, and were
phonologically facilitative, leading to high accuracy values.
It is worth bearing in mind that the direction of influence can switch. A word, such as
sail, which is rarely heard in the past tense and had low telicity ratings is much less likely to be
accurately inflected. Just as phonology and telicity can cancel each other out, so can frequency
and telicity. Consider turn, which was rated as ongoing by the adult raters, but was commonly
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 19
heard in the past tense. It ranks as mid-accuracy verb. Verbs that are never observed in the past
tense, in CHILDES hum, rake, giggle, and imagine naturally get low telicity ratings. In these
cases any advantages provided by the phonological form cannot overcome the negative influence
of telicity and frequency. Verbs, such as exercise, and rest, which get low ratings on both telicity
and frequency measures and have uniformly poor phonological characteristics, are among the
least likely verbs to be inflected.
Comparison to other studies
To further clarify how logistic regression influences the interpretation of results, we
compare our results to those from Johnson and Morris (2007) in Table 5. It is worth noting that
our results mirror theirs fairly closely. Although our children tend to be more accurate overall,
they are also 2+ years older than their participants were. If we were to have run parametric
statistics, we might have observed an interaction between telicity and phonology in either study.
The reader should note that the phonological factors have very little influence when the target
verb is highly telic/common in the past tense when children start at a fairly high level of
accuracy (Table 5d and 5e). Differences are more readily observable based on phonology in the
SLI group (Table 5c) because they start at a lower level of accuracy. Differences between easy
and complex articulatory contexts are most observable in the low frequency/atelic verbs for all
groups of children, but especially in the SLI group. Thus we have extended the findings from
Johnson and Morris’ case study of a single 4-year-old child with SLI to a larger group of older
children with SLI.
Although studies consistently find that the children with SLI do more poorly than their
TD peers in overall accuracy, whether or not this is exacerbated by a non-facilitative context was
less clear (i.e., Oetting & Horohov, 1997; Marchman et al., 1999; Leonard et al., 2007a, 2007b;
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 20
van der Lely & Ullman, 2001). Our models suggest that each factor is influential, but that
interactions between diagnostic group and those factors are not likely. Our choice of statistical
method may be influencing our outcomes. Logistical regression emphasizes movement between
two extreme points and changes in the error rate. When errors are rare (as they are for the age-
matched group), a factor that doubles the error rate may not lead to a great change in the overall
accuracy level. Likewise, for the SLI group, for whom errors are more common, the doubling of
the same factor led to large changes in accuracy. Such differences may mislead researchers into
believing that interaction effects are present when in fact the factors are acting in similar ways on
the likelihood of producing an error across groups of children; it is actually the base rate of errors
that differs.
The primary areas in which group interactions were observed were in words ending in
obstruent consonants and lemma frequency, both of which influenced the MLU-matched group
differently than the age-matched group. The interactions with the younger group both served to
reduce the degree of difference between high and low frequency verbs and between verbs with
more or less-facilitative phonological contexts. Given that these children begin at a lower level
of overall accuracy, the interactions serve to reduce the differences between the different types of
verbs for this group and thus boost overall accuracy.
Conclusion
This study has implemented the recommendations of Weiler (2013) who reminded us of
Crystal’s (1985) suggestion that verb selection for teaching a target morpheme should not be
random or arbitrary. Verbs have certain properties that make them more or less facilitative and
attention to these properties may enhance therapeutic effectiveness. Selection of verbs that are
telic, commonly inflected in the past tense, and end in facilitative phonological contexts is likely
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 21
to lead to higher accuracy levels. Selection of verbs that are atelic, less commonly inflected in
the past tense and end in obstruents or alveolars are likely to lead to lower initial accuracy but
may make good generalization targets. Clinicians should ensure that clients have mastered the
past tense in both types of contexts.
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 22
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by an internal research grant from the University of Iowa. We would
like to thank the children and families who participated in this project and the support of
Augustana College (Allison Haskill) and the Scottish Rite Program (Elizabeth Merrifield) for
assistance with subject recruitment. This paper benefited from discussion within the Language
Discussion Group at the University of Iowa. Susan Wagner Cook provided advice on statistical
analysis. Jean Gordon read and commented on the paper and its presentation of material.
Portions of the paper were presented at BUCLD held in Boston, MA in 2009.
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 23
Works Cited
1.BAAYEN, R. H., DAVIDSON, D. J., & BATES, D. M., 2008, Mixed-effects modeling with
crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59 4,,
390–412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
2.BLOM, E., & PARADIS, J, 2013, Past tense production by English second language learners
with and without language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing
Research, 56, 281–294. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0112)
3.BLOOM, L., LIFTER, K., & HAFITZ, J., 1980, Semantics of verbs and the development of
verb inflection in child language. Language, 56, 386–412.
4.CRYSTAL, D., 1985, Some early problems with verbs. Child Language Teaching and
Therapy, 1, 46–53.
5.GILLAM, R., & PEARSON, N., 2004, Test of Narrative Language: Examiner's Manual.
Austin: PRO-ED.
6.JAEGER, T. F., 2008, Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs transformation or
not, and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446.
doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
7.JOHNSON, B. W., & FEY, M. E., 2006, Interaction of lexical and grammatical aspect in
toddlers' language. Journal of Child Language, 33, 419–435.
doi:10.1017/S0305000906007410
8.JOHNSON, B. W., & MORRIS, S., 2007, Clinical implications of the effects of lexical aspect
and phonology on children's production of the regular past tense. Child Language
Teaching and Therapy, 23, 287–306.
9.KAUFMAN, A. S., & KAUFMAN, N. L., 2004, KBIT-2: Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test.
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 24
San Antonio: Pearson.
10. KEMP, S., KORKMAN, M., & KIRK, U., 1998, Essentials of NEPSY Assessment. New
York: Harcourt Assessments.
11. LEONARD, L. B., DAVIS, J., & DEEVY, P., 2007a, Phonotactic probability and past tense
use by children with specific language impairment and their typically-developing peers.
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 21, 747–758. doi:10.1080/02699200701495473
12. LEONARD, L. B., DEEVY, P., KURTZ, R., KRANTZ CHOREV, L., OWEN, A., POLITE, E.,
ELAM, D., FINNERAN, D., 2007b, Lexical aspect and the use of verb morphology by
children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing
Research, 50, 759–777.
13. MACWHINNEY, B., 2000, The Childes Project : Tools for Analyzing Talk, 3rd Edition 2
Volume Set with CD-Rom, 3rd ed. p. 808, Psychology Press.
14. MARCHMAN, V. A., WULFECK, B., & ELLIS WEISMER, S., 1999, Morphological
productivity in children with normal language and SLI: A study of the English past tense.
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42 206–219.
15. MARSHALL, C. R., & VAN DER LELY, H. K. J., 2006, A challenge to current models of
past tense inflection: the impact of phonotactics. Cognition, 100, 302–320.
16. MARSHALL, C. R., & VAN DER LELY, H. K. J., 2007, The impact of phonological
complexity on past tense inflection in children with Grammatical-SLI. International
Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 9, 191–203. doi:10.1080/14417040701261509
17. NICOLADIS, E., PALMER, A., & MARENTETTE, P., 2007, The role of type and token
frequency in using past tense morphemes correctly. Developmental Science, 10, 237–
254.
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 25
18. OETTING, J. B., & HOROHOV, J. E., 1997, Past-tense marking by children with and
without specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing
Research, 40, 62–74.
19. OWEN, A. J., 2010, Factors affecting accuracy of past tense production in children with
specific language impairment and their typically-developing peers: The influence of verb
transitivity, clause location, and sentence type. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing
Research, 53, 993–1014.
20. RICE, M. L., & OETTING, J. B., 1993, Morphological deficits of children with SLI:
evaluation of number marking and agreement Journal of speech and hearing research, 36,
1249–1257.
21. SHIRAI, Y., & ANDERSEN, R. W., 1995, The acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: A
prototype account. Language, 71, 743–762.
22. STORKEL, H. L., 2004, Methods for minimizing the confounding effects of word length in
the analysis of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density. Journal of Speech,
Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1454–1468.
23. STORKEL, H. L., & HOOVER, J. R., 2010, An online calculator to compute phonotactic
probability and neighborhood density on the basis of child corpora of spoken American
English Behavior research methods, 42, 497–506. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.2.497
24. VAN DER LELY, H. K. J., & ULLMAN, U. M., 2001, Past tense morphology in specifically
language impaired and normally developing children. Language and Cognitive Processes,
16, 177-217.
25. VENDLER, Z., 1957, Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, 66, 143-160.
26. VITEVITCH, M., & LUCE, P., 2004, A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 26
probability for words and nonwords in English. Behavior Research Methods,
Instruments, & Computers, 36, 481–487.
27. WEILER, B., 2013, Verb selection and past-tense morphology: Crystalʼs criteria revisited.
Topics in Language Disorders, 33, 152–164.
28. WERNER, E., & KRESHECK, J., 1983, SPELT-II: Structured Photographic Expressive
Language Test, 2nd ed., DeKalb, IL: Janelle Publications.
29. WILLIAMS, K. T., 1997, Expressive Vocabulary Test. Circle Pines, MN: American
Guidance Service.
30. WULFF, S., ELLIS, N., ROEMER, U., BARDOVI-HARLIG, K., & LEBLANC, C., 2009, The
acquisition of tense–aspect: Converging evidence from corpora and telicity ratings. The
Modern Language Journal, 93, 354–369.
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 27
What this paper adds
Section 1: What is already known. Young children are more accurate at producing past tense
when a verb is prototypically telic (completed) and when a verb ends in a vowel. Only one study,
examining typically-developing 2-year-olds has examined how telicity and phonology influence
production of past tense together. They found that phonology is only influential when the verb is
in an atelic (ongoing) context. Less is known about how these factors are related to lexical
frequency, another common measure associated with past tense production. Understanding how
these words level factors interact with each other and which factors are more influential would
assist clinicians in selecting target words for use in intervention and therapy.
Section 2: What this study adds. Past tense frequency, telicity, and phonological factors
uniquely and approximately equally contribute to the prediction of past tense use. Manipulation
of all three factors is critical for successful control of stimuli during intervention. Verbs can be
ranked in order of difficulty, such that verbs that are most commonly heard in the past tense,
prototypically telic, and end in a vowel or a non-alveolar consonant are most likely to be
produced correctly. Although children with SLI were overall less accurate, these factors
influenced children with SLI and their age-matched peers in similar ways. MLU-matched
children were more sensitive to lemma frequency and less sensitive to phonological factors as
compared to their peers.
Quantifying Past Tense Accuracy 28
top related