lec3-process1 - department of computer science at … mode qin user-mode, a process can directly...

Processes & Threads

CSC501 Operating Systems Principles

1

Survey:

Tell me your experience with the Lab facility and Xinu!

2

Last Lecture

q OS structures

Question:

What are those OS structures?

3

Comparison

Performance Extensibility Reliability

Monolithic

Layered

Microkernel

Best WorstIn between

4

Outline

q BackgroundQ Von Neumann Model (e.g., Memory & CPU)Q Execution Mode

q Processesq Threads

5

Introduction: Von Neumann Model

q Memory contains both text (program) and dataq CPU executes several stages:Q Fetch instructionQ Decode instructionQ Execute instructionQ Write back result(s)

Memory

CPU

§ OS is just a program§ OS text and data reside in memory too§ It invokes various functionalities through procedure calls

Execution Mode

q Kernel mode -- privilegedQ Run OS kernel codeQ Access hardware resourcesQ Protected from interference by user programs

q User mode – non-privilegedQ Run user programs

Question: Can we move certain OS

functionality to user-mode?

7

User Mode

q In user-mode, a process can directly access onlyQ Its user-space virtual memoryQ Processor resources (non-privileged registers)

q All other resourcesQ Can only be accessed through the kernelQ Via various system call interfaces

8

System Call

q It is a call because Q It looks like a procedure call

q It's a system call becauseQ It is a software trap

Question: Why is a system call a trap instead

of a procedure call?

9

Mode Switching

q Processor Status Word (PSW):Q Certain bit indicates the current mode of executionQ What are other bits?v Interrupt enabled/disabled flags, alignment check bit,

arithmetic overflow bit, parity bit, carry bit, etc.q Mode bits can be changed explicitly while in

kernel-mode but not in user-modeQ Setting of kernel mode bit in the interrupt vector

allows interrupt and trap handlers to be "automatically" executed in kernel mode

10

System Call In Monolithic OS

kernel mode

user mode

read(....)

PC PSW

code for read system call

trap

interrupt vector for trap instruction

iret

system call routine

Process

A process is a system abstraction:illusion of being the only job in the system

12

Process

q Multiple running processes

q Each running process observes an abstraction of processorQ Known only to operating

systemQ Not known by hardware

13

Processq An "instantiation" of a programq OS abstraction

Q Unknown to hardwareQ Created dynamically

q Pertinent information kept by OSQ Saved in a data structure called process control

block (PCB)

14

Process Control Block (PCB)

q For each process, process control block includes Q Identification information:v Process ID, parent process ID, user ID

Q Control information:v Scheduling (state, priority)v Resources (memory, opened files)v IPC facilities used

Q An address spacev Code, data, and stack segments

Q Execution contexts – threadsv machine state, thread execution stack

15

Process Address Space

OS

CodeGlobals

Heap

Stack

A's activationframe

B

C

A:...B()...

B:...C()...

C:

0x00…00

0xFF…FF

Is Linux designed differently16

Virtual Memory

q Process addresses are virtual memory addresses

q Mapping from virtual memory to physical memoryQ Details in later lecturesQ Translation: v Translation Look-aside Buffer (TLB)v Page table

q Will cover more later ...

17

Example PCB in XINU

18

Thread

A thread is a processor abstraction:illusion of having one processor per

execution context

19

Threadq Multiple execution contexts à threadsq All the threads of a process share the same address

space and the same resourcesq Each thread contains àQ An execution state: running, ready, etc..Q An execution context: PC, SP, other registersQ A per-thread stack

20

Single-threaded vs. Multithreaded

21

Process Address Space Revisited

OS

Code

Globals

Heap

Stack

OS

Code

GlobalsHeap

Stack

Stack

(a) Single-threaded address space (b) Multi-threaded address space

22

Threads vs. Processesq Why multiple threads? àQ Can't we use multiple processes instead?v Sure, but we need shared memory/other resources

between multiple processes Q Operations on threads are cheaper than the

corresponding operations on processesv Thread operations do not involve manipulations of

other resources associated with processesv Inter-thread communication through shared memory

without kernel intervention

23

Thread Implementation

q Kernel-level threads (lightweight processes)Q Kernel sees multiple execution contextsQ Thread management done by the kernel

q User-level threadsQ Implemented as a thread library which contains

the code for thread creation, termination, scheduling and switching

Q Kernel sees one execution context and is unaware of thread activity

Q Can be pre-emptive or not

24

User-Level vs. Kernel-Level Threads

q Advantages of user-level threads àQ Performance: low-cost thread operations and context

switching, since it is not necessary to go into the kernelQ Flexibility: scheduling can be application-specificQ Portability: user-level thread library easy to port

q Disadvantages of user-level threads àQ If a user-level thread is blocked in the kernel, the entire

process (all threads of that process) are blockedQ Cannot take advantage of multiprocessing (the kernel

assigns one process to only one processor)

25

User-Level vs. Kernel-Level Threads

process

processor

user-levelthreads

threadscheduling

processscheduling

kernel-levelthreads

threadscheduling

kernel

user

processor

threads

threads

processscheduling

User-Level vs. Kernel-Level Threads

q No reason why we shouldn't have both (e.g. Solaris)

q Most systems now support kernel threads

q User-level threads are available as linkable libraries

kernel-levelthreads

processor

user-levelthreads

threadscheduling

threadscheduling

kernel

user

processscheduling

Solaris Threads: hybrid

Thread/Process Operation Latencies

1,84044137Signal-wait

11,30094834Null fork

Processes (µs)

Kernel Threads

(µs)

User-level Threads

(µs)

Operation

VAX uniprocessor running UNIX-like OS, 1992.

Threads vs. Processes

q Why NOT multiple threads? àQ Are operations on threads really cheaper than the

corresponding operations on processes?v Memory fragmentation

Q If a process is overloaded with too many threads, how about responsiveness, reliability, and security?

q Check out the Google Chrome Comic bookQ http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/

30

Threads vs. Processes

Performance Responsiveness Fexibility Security

Processes

Threads

Better Worse

31

Next Lecture

q Process lifecycle and context switching

32