knut erik hovda, md, phd the norwegian center for nbc medicine department of acute medicine oslo...

Post on 01-Jan-2016

220 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Knut Erik Hovda, MD, PhDThe Norwegian Center for NBC Medicine

Department of Acute MedicineOslo University Hospital, Ullevaal

Oslo, Norway

Methanol poisoning outbreaks – Rapid diagnosis and management

APAMT 2011 Penang, Malaysia

Overview

• Background – Methanol and its metabolism– The methanol challenge– Goal and room for improvement– Obstacles– A possible solution: The formate analysis

• Results/discussion• Conclusion

Methanol and metabolism

Adjusted from Hovda KE. PhD thesis 2005.

The methanol challenge

• High morbidity and mortality, even with small doses (minimum lethal dose estimated 1g/kg1)

• Specific and efficient treatment exists, but suffers from often late diagnosis and initiation of treatment

• Probably the most frequently reported toxicant in outbreaks, these are often in the developing world

1Roe O. Crit Rev Toxicol 1982; 10(4): 275-286

Goal and room for improvement

• Strategy for mass poisonings: – The general medical rule applies:

Optimal treatment for as many as possible• How:

– Early diagnosis – Effective treatment – Cost-beneficial treatment

Diagnostics….(I)

1. Patient history2. Clinical features

1. Hyperventilation2. Pseudopapillitis*3. Symtoms may vary (visual disturbances, GI-

symptoms, chest pain, dyspnoea)

*hyperemia of the papilla without dioptric difference

Diagnostics….(I)

1. Patient history2. Clinical features

1. Hyperventilation2. Pseudopapillitis*3. Symtoms may vary (visual disturbances, GI-

symptoms, chest pain, dyspnoea)

*hyperemia of the papilla without dioptric difference

Diagnostics….(I)

1. Patient history2. Clinical features

1. Hyperventilation2. Pseudopapillitis*3. Symtoms may vary (visual disturbances, GI-

symptoms, chest pain, dyspnoea)

*hyperemia of the papilla without dioptric difference

Pseudopapillitis

Before After

Methanol exposureFrom Ingemansson SO. PhD thesis Stockholm 1983

Diagnostics….(I)

1. Patient history2. Clinical features

1. Hyperventilation2. Pseudopapillitis*3. Symtoms may vary (visual disturbances, GI-

symptoms, chest pain, dyspnoea)

*hyperemia of the papilla without dioptric difference

Diagnostics….(II)

3. Analytical features: a. Arterial blood gas (ABG)b. Osmolal gap (OG) (to be used together with the

anion gap (AG))c. Specific serum analyses of the toxic alcohol (gold

standard. Time consuming and less available)d. S-formate analysis* (very simple, cheap and fast.

High specificity and sensitivity. At present less available)

* Hovda KE et al. J Anal Toxicol 2005; 29(6): 586-588

Diagnostics….(II)

3. Analytical features: a. Arterial blood gas (ABG)b. Osmolal gap (OG) (to be used together with the

anion gap (AG))c. Specific serum analyses of the toxic alcohol (gold

standard. Time consuming and less available)d. S-formate analysis* (very simple, cheap and fast.

High specificity and sensitivity. At present less available)

* Hovda KE et al. J Anal Toxicol 2005; 29(6): 586-588

BUFFERS (Hb, proteins)

ACIDOSIS

Formate¯

H + Formic acid

Methanol

↑ OG

Antidote

CO₂

HCO₃¯

Hypervent

H₂O

BUFFERS (Hb, proteins)

ACIDOSIS

Formate¯

H +Formic acid

Methanol

↑ OG

Antidote

↑ AG

CO₂

HCO₃¯

Hypervent

H₂O

BUFFERS (Hb, proteins)

ACIDOSIS

Formate¯

H +Formic acid

Methanol

↑ OG

Antidote

Three stages of methanol poisoning

Hovda KE et al. Int Care Med 2004; 30(9): 1842-6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Res

ult o

f ana

lyze

s (m

mol

/L

or m

Osm

/kgH

2O)

Anion gap

Osmolal gap

S-methanol

S-formate

AG

OG

AG

OG

AG

OG

EARLY INTERMEDIATE LATE

Diagnostics….(II)

3. Analytical features: a. Arterial blood gas (ABG)b. Osmolal gap (OG) (to be used together with the

anion gap (AG))c. Specific serum analyses of the toxic alcohol (gold

standard. Time consuming and less available)d. S-formate analysis* (very simple, cheap and fast.

High specificity and sensitivity. At present less available)

* Hovda KE et al. J Anal Toxicol 2005; 29(6): 586-588

Diagnostics….(II)

3. Analytical features: a. Arterial blood gas (ABG)b. Osmolal gap (OG) (to be used together with the

anion gap (AG))c. Specific serum analyses of the toxic alcohol (gold

standard. Time consuming and less available)d. S-formate analysis* (very simple, cheap and fast.

High specificity and sensitivity. At present less available)

* Hovda KE et al. J Anal Toxicol 2005; 29(6): 586-588

Obstacles (I)1. Symptoms mimicking other diagnoses:• Typical symptoms:

– Dyspnoea (15-41%)1-4

– GI symptoms (18-67%)1-5

– Visual disturbances (33-55%)1,2,4,5

Hyperventilation! 1Sejersted OM et al. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1981: 699-7062Hovda KE et al. J Intern Med 2005; 258(2): 181-903Bennett JL et al Medicine(Baltimore)1953;32:431-463 4Paasma R et al. Clin Toxicol 2007; 45:152-1585Swartz RD et al Medicine(Baltimore)1981;60: 373-382

Diffuse symptoms

Often lacking

Septic? Other MA?

Obstacles (II)

2. Resources (economical and knowledge) and lack of equipment

• Methanol analysis involves GC-MS and is not available most places. Time consuming.

• Osmolality analysis is hardly ever available outside the developed world. Excellent substitute if available, but unspecific.

Possible solution (I)The formate analysis

• Background:– Formate – the toxic metabolite of

methanolNo formate produced = no symptoms from

methanol poisoning: Patients admitted with a metabolic

acidosis without increased S-formate = metabolic acidosis NOT because of metOH poisoning!

Possible solution (II)Pro et contra

+ Advantage: + Cheap+ Simple (used on very frequently found analyzers. Kit.)+ Fast (<30 min)+ Kits can be stored in central places (Can be stored for decades)

- Limitation: - Lack of knowledge - Lack of necessary apparatus (generally available most places,

also in many parts of the 3rd world) and lack of necessary reagents

HCOOH + NAD+ ↔ CO2 + NADH + H+

enzyme: Formate dehydrogenase (FDH)

NADH: absorbance of 340 nM:

Possible solution (III)Formate analysis - principles

FDH

FDH

Hovda KE. PhD thesis 2005.

1Schaller KH, Triebig GT. Formate Determination with Formate Dehydrogenase. In: Bergmeyer HU, editor. Methods of enzymatic analysis. 3rd ed. Weinheim, Germany: Verlag Chemie; 1984. p. 668-72.

Simplified algorithmPatient with

suspected metOH poisoning

Metabolic acidosis

No metabolic acidosis

S-formate ↑ S-formate - S-formate -S-formate ↑

Methanol poisoning

Metabolic acidosis of

other origin

New S-formate after 4-6 hrs if

still suspicious or metabolic acidosis

Early, no metabolism yet or no methanol

poisoning

The formate analysis – a prospective study

• 15 methanol poisoned patients*:– 15/15 ↑ S-methanol (13-450 mg/dL / 4-141 mmol/L)– 10/15 symptoms– 14/15 ↑ S-formate (2-148 mg/dL / 0.4-32 mmol/L) S-formate detected in 4/5 before symptoms started

• Very sensitive (1.3 mmol/L or 4 mg/dL) and specific**• Upper reference range 0.4 mmol/L or 2 mg/dL**

* Hovda KE et al. J Anal Toxicol 2005; 29(6): 586-588

**Urdal P. Clin Chem 1984; 30: 911-913

Suggestion for a formate kit

• Content: – 1 vial of formate dehydrogenase– 1 vial of NAD+ – 1 vial with positive control– 1 direction for use

• 1 kit can be used for 10, 50 or even 100 patients within a few days.

• Very low costs

NAD

FDH

Economical aspects

• Estimated prize;– Formate dehydrogenase (FDH) represents

approximately 70% of the costs of the method (the rest is mainly NAD-costs)

– Cost of 250U of FDH; Euro 256 (USD 325)Need for FDH pr analysis; 1.6-1.8U

– Total cost/analysis; Euro 2-3? (USD 2.5-4?)

Result/discussion

• Developing countries: Earlier diagnosis and hence better treatment where it is mostly needed

• Developed countries: Simplified diagnosis (and hence treatment?), especially during mass outbreaks: Fast, secure and efficient approach. Cost-beneficial

• Great value of the method in the clinical setting with a metabolic acidosis of unknown origin

Conclusion

• The formate analysis legitimate its existence in the diagnostic setting because:– It is fast and cheap, has a high sensitivity and specificity– Used on metabolic acidosis of unknown origin it enhances a

simple diagnostic approach– Otherwise undiagnosed patients can get their correct

diagnosis and treatment established– Interesting both where resources are scarce and in western

countries for fast diagnosis and positive cost-benefit

Thank you for your kind attention!

k.e.hovda@medisin.uio.no

top related