investigation on the influence of inlet conditions on the scour phenomenon

Post on 07-Jul-2015

158 Views

Category:

Education

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Presentation of the conclusions of a research internship at TUM carried out in 2010. The scour phenomenon is the fact that around marine structures embedded into the sediment bed, vortices are created which "scour", that is, erode the sediment bed and thus make the structure vulnerable. This study shows that experiments and empirical formulas produced by different researchers around the world show biases linked to their different experimental settings, relatively to the water inlet conditions. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

TRANSCRIPT

Investigation on the influence of

the inlet conditions on the scouring

process

Student : Cédric Bellet

School tutor: Michel Benoit

1

ENPC 2010

Introduction

• What is the scouring process?

• Research on the scouring process

• What is an inlet condition?

2

ENPC 2010

Introduction

• What is the scouring process?

• Research on the scouring process

• What is an inlet condition?

3

ENPC 2010

Introduction

ENPC 2010

4

Introduction

ENPC 2010

5

Scour at marine structures, Richard Whitehouse

Introduction

• What is the scouring process?

• Research on the scouring process

• What is an inlet condition?

ENPC 2010

6

Introduction

• Empirical formulas

• Simulations: Direct Numerical Simulation, Large Eddy Simulation, etc.

• Measurement: hot-film velocimetry, Laser Doppler Velocimetry, etc.

ENPC 2010

7

Introduction

• What is the scouring process?

• Research on the scouring process

• What is an inlet condition?

ENPC 2010

8

Introduction

ENPC 2010

9

Introduction

ENPC 2010

10

Introduction: objectives

• Draw up the state of the question of the influence of the inlet conditions on the scouring process

• Quantify this influence in the framework of the experiments conducted at the laboratory

ENPC 2010

11

Introduction: stakes

• Critique of the experiments conducted in the laboratory

• Critique of the methods employed by other researchers

• Focus on a parameter neglected by the researchers

ENPC 2010

12

Technische Üniversität München

• Founded in 1868 by Ludwig II

• 23000 students each year

• Since 2006, belongs to the Elite Universities of Germany

ENPC 2010

13

Fachgebiet Hydromechanik

• First chair of the TUM

• Around ten researchers▫ Numerical simulation

▫ Laboratory experiments on scour

▫ Cooperation with the city of Munich (Isar)

▫ Hydromechanic courses and study trips

ENPC 2010

14

Fachgebiet Hydromechanik

ENPC 2010

15

Dipl.-Ing. Florian PflegerResearch Associate

Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. M. ManhartHead of Chair

Dr.-Ing. Christoph RappHead of Laboratory

Outline

1. Influence of the inlet condition on the scouring process: starting point

2. Measurement technique: the Laser Doppler Velocimetry (and a first measurement)

3. Measurements, discussion, conclusion

ENPC 2010

16

Outline

1. Influence of the inlet condition on the scouring process: starting point

2. Measurement technique: the Laser Doppler Velocimetry (and a first measurement)

3. Measurements, discussion, conclusion

ENPC 2010

17

Influence of the inlet condition on the

scouring process: starting point

ENPC 2010

18

Hydromechanics elements

Reynolds number:

• Ratio of the inertial forces to the viscous forces

• is the hydraulic radius,

• the flow depth,

• the channel width ;

• is the flow mean velocity of the flow,

• the kinematic viscosity of the fluid

ENPC 2010

19

Hydromechanics elements

Froude number:

• Ratio of the inertial forces to the gravitational forces

• is the velocity of the flow at one point

• the flow depth;

• the gravity acceleration

ENPC 2010

20is the velocity of the flow at one point

Hydromechanics elements

• Froude number is equal to 0.33

subcritical flow

• Reynolds number is equal to 176000

fully turbulent flow

ENPC 2010

21

The turbulent boundary layer

ENPC 2010

22

The sediment

• Non-cohesive sand

• Mean size 1.9mm

• Natural angle of repose: 30°

ENPC 2010

23

The scouring process

ENPC 2010

24

Predictive formulas

• Thirteen formulas

• Seven input parameters The flow depth,

The pier diameter ,

The mean velocity ,

The critical velocity ,

The mean size of the sediment ,

The non-uniformity of the sediment ,

The natural angle of repose

• One output: the scour depth

ENPC 2010

25

Predictive formulas

ENPC 2010

26

Measurements under different inlet

conditions

ENPC 2010

27

Plexiglas pan on the water surface

ENPC 2010

28

Flow straighteners

ENPC 2010

29

Flow straighteners and a weir

ENPC 2010

30

Plates with holes

ENPC 2010

31

Plates and a weir

ENPC 2010

32

Observations

• The inlet condition has a significant influence on the scouring process

• Both dynamics and equilibrium are affected

• The measurements range within the predictions

• Inlet conditions can be classified

ENPC 2010

33

Observations

Scour depth after

two hours

Flow straighteners 5cm

Flow straighteners

plus weir

8-9cm

Grids 9-10cm

Grids plus weir 11cm

ENPC 2010

34

Observations

ENPC 2010

35

Inlet condition ? ?Scour dynamics and equilibrium

Outline

1. Influence of the inlet condition on the scouring process: starting point

2. Measurement technique: the Laser Doppler Velocimetry (and a first measurement)

3. Measurements, discussion, conclusion

ENPC 2010

36

Measurement technique: the Laser

Doppler Velocimetry (and a first

measurement)

ENPC 2010

37

Laboratory configuration

ENPC 2010

38

Laser Doppler Velocimetry

• A flow is seeded with small buoyant particles that scatter light

ENPC 2010

39

Laser Doppler Velocimetry

• Two Laser beams cross at a point called the measurement volume, and create a set of fringes

ENPC 2010

40

Laser Doppler Velocimetry

• Particles crossing the measurement volume emit a signal whose frequency is proportional to their velocity.

ENPC 2010

41

Laser Doppler Velocimetry

• The signal is processed by a computer so as to get this velocity.

ENPC 2010

42

Laser Doppler Velocimetry

• Frequency shift:

• Detected frequency with and without frequency shift:

ENPC 2010

43

Processing of the data• Fast Fourier

Transform

• Determination of the main frequency

• Determination of the corresponding velocity

ENPC 2010

44

Processing of the data

• Around 2000 bursts: reliable information

• Mean velocity component: expected value

• Root mean square fluctuation component: variance

ENPC 2010

45

A first measurement

ENPC 2010

46

Velocity field?•One measurement= one velocity component•2D velocities= two measurements per point

A first measurement

ENPC 2010

47

• 95 points

• 2 measurement directions per point

• 2000 bursts per measurement

A first measurement

ENPC 2010

48

A first measurement • Presence of the horseshoe vortex

• The approaching flow is bent by the presence of the pier

• But: some oddities

ENPC 2010

49

Problems encountered• Fast Fourier samples number too small: peak-locking

ENPC 2010

50

Problems encountered

• Measurement directions too close one to another

Small input variations result in very different outputs.

ENPC 2010

51

Outline

1. Influence of the inlet condition on the scouring process: starting point

2. Measurement technique: the Laser Doppler Velocimetry (and a first measurement)

3. Measurements, discussion, conclusion

ENPC 2010

52

Measurements, discussion, conclusion

ENPC 2010

53

Measurement of four different velocity

profiles

ENPC 2010

54

•Four different vertical velocity profiles•Measured under four different inlet condtions

ENPC 2010

55

Comment

ENPC 2010

56

•The red profile cannot be used, because the flow was assymetric•The other profiles have identical mean velocities•And show significant differences of distribution in the upper region

The inlet conditions have an influence on the vertical velocity distributions

Comparison of the measured profiles

ENPC 2010

57

Wall shear stress of the different profiles: (Sagaut, 2006)

Comparison of the measured profiles

ENPC 2010

58

Scour depth

after two

hours

Wall shear

stress

Flow

straighteners

5cm 0.32Pa

Flow

straighteners plus

weir

8-9cm ?

Grids 9-10cm 0.35Pa

Grids plus weir 11cm 0.40Pa

Ettema’s Theory (1980)

ENPC 2010

59

“The higher the shear parameter, the deeper the scour depth”

Influence of the inlet condition

ENPC 2010

60

Inlet conditionVertical velocity

distributionWall shear

stressShear

parameterEttema’s theory

Scour dynamicsand equilibrium

Introduction: objectives

• Draw up the state of the question of the influence of the inlet conditions on the scouring process OK

• Quantify this influence in the framework of the experiments conducted at the laboratory OK

ENPC 2010

61

But…

ENPC 2010

62

Why is the influence of the inlet

conditions hardly ever mentioned?

ENPC 2010

63

The researchers’ assumption

ENPC 2010

64

Inlet conditionVertical velocity

distributionWall shear

stressShear

parameterEttema’s theory

Scour dynamicsand equilibrium

Universallogarithmic

profile

How can someone get a universal

velocity profile?• After a certain free flow length, a boundary layer is

fully developeduniversal logarithmic velocity profile

• But there is no acknowledged criterion establishing this free flow length. This length is case-specific, and is not reached in our case

ENPC 2010

65

Reference Flow

depth

Channel

width

Channel

length

Free flow

length

Hydraulic

radius

Free flow

length/hydr

aulic radius

Link 2006 20-40cm 2m 30m 15m 17-29cm 51-88

Carette

2008

25cm 1.17m 11m 6.5m 17cm 38

Yanmaz

1991

4-16.5cm 0.67m 10.9m 6.9m 4-11cm 62-172

Zanke 1982 42-55cm 0.6m 15m 7.5m 17.5-

20cm

38-43

Dey 1995 3-5cm 0.81m 10m 5m 3-5cm 100-166

Oliveto

2007

4-60cm 1m 30m 15m 4-27cm 55-375

Melville

1987

10-24cm 0.44m 11.8m 6m 7-12cm 50-85

This report 15cm 1.17m N/A 6.5m 12cm 54

ENPC 2010

66

Conclusion

• The inlet condition affects the scour phenomenon through the value of the shear parameter, in line with Ettema’s theory

• Researchers tackle this problem by assuming that the boundary layer is fully developed which is the case when the free flow length is big enough

• In our case, the free flow length is not big enough. Flumes of comparable dimensions might have the same problem

ENPC 2010

67

Conclusion

• A criterion should be created to determine a correct inlet condition; else, the shear parameter should be explicitly mentioned.

• Experiments conducted under comparable configuration should be considered with precaution.

ENPC 2010

68

Merci de votre attentionENPC 2010

69

top related