indicator 4.6. genetic resources - unece.org filein situ – broadleaves (‘000 ha) fagus sylvatica...
Post on 02-Sep-2019
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Indicator 4.6.Genetic resources
Jarkko Koskela
EUFORGEN Coordinator
Bioversity InternationalRegional Office for Europe, Rome
UNECE/FAO ToS on Monitoring of Sustainable Forest Management
EU-JRC, Ispra, Italy, 26-28 January 2010
State of Europe’s Forests 2007
• Indicator 4.6 of the pan-European C&I for sustainable forest management– area managed for conservation and utilisation of
forest tree genetic resources (in situ and ex situgene conservation)
– area managed for seed production
• Trends in implementation of sustainable forest management in Europe (1990, 2000 and 2005)
State of Europe’s Forests 2007
• Area managed for in situ gene conservation– in situ gene conservation
units – gene reserve forests and
other similar areas – those natural parks and
other protected areas where gene conservation has been specifically identified as one of the management objectives
– “in situ” gene conservation units of landraces of exotic tree species
State of Europe’s Forests 2007
• Area managed for ex situ gene conservation– ex situ collections– long-term provenance
trials– ex situ gene conservation
units of genetic material of exotic tree species which have not yet developed into landraces
State of Europe’s Forests 2007
• Area managed for seed production– seed orchards– seed stands included in a
national register of basic material
State of Europe’s Forests 2007
• Data collection for indicator 4.6.– EUFORGEN National Coordinators and Focal
Points contacted– gene conservation and seed production of “major”
European tree species (i.e. those listed under the Council Directive (1999/105/EC) on the marketing of forest reproductive material and those ones the EUFORGEN Networks have been working with)
• Results presented in the report– tables for total areas per country; total areas of
selected species
Indicator 4.6. 1990-2005
• 38 countries provided data • 135 tree species, subspecies and hybrids • The total area managed for in situ gene conservation
increased from 316,000 ha to 748,000 ha (59->93 species)
• The area managed for ex situ gene conservation increased from 3,000 ha to 7,000 ha (56->85 species)
• The areas managed for seed production from 464,000 ha to 528,000 ha (85-> 90 species)
In situ – conifers (‘000 ha)
Pic
ea a
bies
Pin
us s
ylve
stris
Abi
es a
lba
Larix
dec
idua
Pin
us n
igra
Pin
us b
rutia
Pin
us le
ucod
erm
isLa
rix s
ibiri
caP
inus
pin
aste
rP
inus
cem
bra
Pin
us h
alep
ensi
sP
inus
pin
eaP
seud
otsu
ga m
enzi
esii
Tax
us b
acca
taA
bies
pin
sapo
Larix
kae
mpf
eri
Larix
x e
urol
epis
Abi
es g
rand
is
Pic
ea s
itche
nsis
Pin
us c
onto
rta
Abi
es c
epha
loni
ca
Ced
rus
atla
ntic
a
Ced
rus
liban
i
Pin
us c
anar
iens
is
Pin
us r
adia
ta
-204060
80
100120
140
160
180
1990
2000
2005
90%
In situ – broadleaves (‘000 ha)
Fag
us
sylv
atic
aQ
uer
cus
pe
trae
aQ
uer
cus
rob
urA
cer p
seu
dop
lata
nu
sF
raxi
nu
s e
xce
lsio
rC
arp
inu
s be
tulu
sT
ilia
cord
ata
Be
tula
pen
dul
aQ
uerc
us
frai
netto
Qu
ercu
s ce
rris
Qu
erc
us p
ube
sce
ns
Ulm
us
gla
bra
Pru
nus
avi
um
Que
rcu
s ile
xS
orbu
s to
rmin
alis
Aln
us
glu
tinos
aP
opu
lus
trem
ula
Tilia
pla
typ
hyllo
sC
ast
an
ea s
ativ
aS
orb
us a
ucup
aria
Be
tula
pub
esc
ens
Fra
xin
us
ang
ustif
olia
Po
pulu
s n
igra
Ace
r ca
mp
estr
eA
cer
pla
tano
ide
sU
lmu
s la
evi
sR
obi
nia
pse
ud
oaca
cia
Que
rcu
s ru
bra
Aln
us in
can
aP
opu
lus
alb
aJu
ngla
s re
gia
Pyr
us
pyra
ste
rS
orb
us
do
me
stic
aQ
ue
rcu
s su
be
r
-
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
1990
2000
2005
52%
Ex situ – conifers (‘000 ha)
Pin
us s
ylve
stris
Pic
ea a
bies
Larix
dec
idua
Pse
udot
suga
men
zies
iiA
bies
alb
aP
inus
nig
raP
icea
sitc
hens
isP
inus
pin
aste
rP
inus
con
tort
aP
inus
cem
bra
Pin
us b
rutia
Larix
x e
urol
epis
Tax
us b
acca
taP
inus
hal
epen
sis
Abi
es g
rand
isLa
rix s
ibiri
caLa
rix k
aem
pfer
iP
inus
pin
eaP
inus
rad
iata
Ced
rus
atla
ntic
aC
edru
s lib
ani
Abi
es c
epha
loni
caA
bies
pin
sapo
Pin
us c
anar
iens
isP
inus
leuc
oder
mis
0
1
2
3
1990
2000
2005
81%
Ex situ – broadleaves (‘000 ha)
Qu
erc
us
rob
ur
Fa
gu
s sy
lva
tica
Be
tula
pe
nd
ula
Po
pu
lus
nig
raA
cer
pse
ud
op
lata
nu
sQ
uerc
us
petr
ae
aR
ob
inia
pse
ud
oa
caci
aP
run
us
avi
um
Aln
us
glu
tino
saF
raxi
nu
s e
xce
lsio
rQ
ue
rcu
s su
be
rP
op
ulu
s tr
em
ula
Tili
a c
ord
ata
So
rbu
s to
rmin
alis
Jun
gla
s re
gia
Ulm
us
gla
bra
Ulm
us
lae
vis
Po
pu
lus
alb
aC
ast
an
ea
sativ
aC
arp
inu
s b
etu
lus
Sor
bu
s d
om
est
ica
Qu
erc
us
rub
raS
orb
us
au
cup
aria
Be
tula
pu
be
scen
sP
yru
s p
yra
ste
rQ
ue
rcu
s fr
ain
etto
Ace
r ca
mp
est
reA
lnu
s in
can
aA
cer
pla
tan
oid
es
Tili
a p
laty
ph
yllo
sQ
ue
rcu
s p
ub
esc
en
sFr
axi
nu
s a
ng
ust
ifolia
Qu
erc
us
cerr
isQ
ue
rcu
s ile
x
-
1
2
3
1990
2000
2005
53%
Seed production – conifers (‘000 ha)
Pic
ea a
bies
Pin
us s
ylve
stris
Pin
us n
igra
Abi
es a
lba
Pin
us b
rutia
Larix
dec
idua
Pin
us p
inas
ter
Pin
us p
inea
Ced
rus
liban
iP
inus
hal
epen
sis
Pse
udot
suga
men
zies
iiP
inus
cem
bra
Abi
es c
epha
loni
caP
icea
sitc
hens
isP
inus
con
tort
aC
edru
s at
lant
ica
Pin
ushe
ldre
ichi
i/leu
code
rmis
Larix
kae
mpf
eri
Pin
us r
adia
ta
Larix
x e
urol
epis
Pin
us c
anar
iens
is
Larix
sib
irica
Tax
us b
acca
ta
Abi
es g
rand
is
Abi
es p
insa
po
-20406080
100
120
140
160
180
1990
2000
2005
63%
Seed production – broadleaves (‘000 ha)
Fa
gu
s sy
lva
tica
Qu
erc
us
pe
tra
ea
Qu
erc
us
rob
ur
Qu
erc
us
sub
er
Qu
erc
us
fra
ine
ttoF
raxi
nu
s e
xce
lsio
rQ
ue
rcu
s ile
xQ
ue
rcu
s ce
rris
Aln
us
glu
tino
saR
ob
inia
pse
ud
oa
caci
aA
cer
pse
ud
op
lata
nu
sQ
ue
rcu
s ru
bra
Tili
a c
ord
ata
Be
tula
pe
nd
ula
Ca
sta
ne
a s
ativ
aP
run
us
avi
um
Ca
rpin
us
be
tulu
sF
raxi
nu
s a
ng
ust
ifolia
Tili
a p
laty
ph
yllo
sB
etu
la p
ub
esc
en
sP
op
ulu
s tr
em
ula
Ulm
us
gla
bra
Ace
r p
lata
no
ide
sP
op
ulu
s n
igra
Pyr
us
pyr
ast
er
Po
pu
lus
alb
aS
orb
us
au
cup
ari
aJu
ng
las
reg
iaS
orb
us
torm
ina
lisQ
ue
rcu
s p
ub
esc
en
sA
cer
cam
pe
stre
So
rbu
s d
om
est
ica
Aln
us
inca
na
Ulm
us
lae
vis
-
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
1990
2000
2005
90%
State of Europe’s Forests 2007
• The level of gene conservation can be considered adequate for only a limited number of tree species in Europe
• The state of gene conservation is rather good for many stand-forming and widely distributed tree species– marginal populations?
• In case of many scattered, rare or endangered tree species there is a need to improve the situation
• Spatial distribution of the gene conservation efforts?
Data collection in 2010
• EUFORGEN National Coordinators and Focal Points will be contacted again
• New developments:– Pan-European minimum requirements for dynamic gene
conservation units (in situ) developed as part of the EUFGIS project
– Databases of breeding populations, collections and provenance trials (ex situ) by the TREEBREEDEX project
– Development of the State of the World’s Forest Genetic Resources report (FAO) by 2013
– EUFORGEN Steering Committee: status of FGR conservation in Europe
• FRA Correspondents will have a change to review the preliminary data
top related