impact of intraocular lens haptic design and orientation
Post on 07-Apr-2018
219 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 Impact of Intraocular Lens Haptic Design and Orientation
1/19
Impact of intraocular lens
haptic design andorientation on
decentration and tilt
-
8/3/2019 Impact of Intraocular Lens Haptic Design and Orientation
2/19
Pendahuluan
Cataract surgery has transitioned from being atreatment for visual rehabilitation to also beinga refractive procedure with aim of gaining visual
function comparable to non cataract elderly eye
Aspheric IOL compensate for sphericalabberation of cornea and contrast sensitivity
-
8/3/2019 Impact of Intraocular Lens Haptic Design and Orientation
3/19
Multifocal IOL decrease spectacledependence
Toric Iolcorrect corneal astigmatism and uncorrected distance vision
IOL performance highly depends on theposition of IOL in the optical system
Holladay et al asperic IOL should bedecentered < 0.4 mm and tilted < 7
-
8/3/2019 Impact of Intraocular Lens Haptic Design and Orientation
4/19
Piers et al critical decentration 0.8 mm and 10 as critical tilt point
Decentration and tilt can be assessed with slitlamp,retroillumination photography, Scheimpflugimaging, and Purkinje reflections.
Purkinje images provide qualitative informationabout IOL alignment and more accurate thanScheimpflug imaging
The aim of this study: to compared the effet of IOLhaptic orientation and haptic-loop design on IOLcentration and tilt using a Purkinje meter.
-
8/3/2019 Impact of Intraocular Lens Haptic Design and Orientation
5/19
Patients and method
Prospective randomized study with intraindividualcomparison comprised patient with age-relatedcataract
Exclusion criteria:- age < 21 years old
- pseudoexfoliation syndrome
- pigment dispersion syndrome- history of ocular trauma or other ocularcomorbiditythat could affect IOLs position
-
8/3/2019 Impact of Intraocular Lens Haptic Design and Orientation
6/19
method
Study consisted of 2 parts
Part 1 comparation of tilt and decentrationbetween horizontal and vertical orientation of aplate-style IOL
One eye was oriented with its haptic horizontalor vertical orientation according randomization,and contralateral eye get the alternate orientation
-
8/3/2019 Impact of Intraocular Lens Haptic Design and Orientation
7/19
Part 2 comparation between hydrophobicacrylic 1-piece IOL with the same hapticmaterial and 3-piece IOL with PMMA haptic
One eye get a 1-piece openloop or a 3-pieceopen-loop IOL according to randomization,contralateral eye get the alternate IOL hapticdesign
both of them were vertically oriented andcentered on the pupil
-
8/3/2019 Impact of Intraocular Lens Haptic Design and Orientation
8/19
Postop evaluation are 1 month and 3 monthpostoperative
Recorded variables:
- visual acuity
- Purkinje meter images
-
8/3/2019 Impact of Intraocular Lens Haptic Design and Orientation
9/19
Results
30 patients were recruited
Mean age of 15 patients in part 1: 75 years
Mean age of 15 patients in part 2: 77 years Mean IOL power: 21.5 D (part 1) and 21.6 D
(part 2)
-
8/3/2019 Impact of Intraocular Lens Haptic Design and Orientation
10/19
Decentration & tilt at 3 month follow up (part 1):- nasal decentration: vertical 8 (57%)
horizontal 11 (77%)
- upward decentration: vertical
12 (79%)horizontal all- temporal tilted : vertical 12 (79%)
horizontal 9 (62%)
- downward tilted: all IOLs
-
8/3/2019 Impact of Intraocular Lens Haptic Design and Orientation
11/19
-
8/3/2019 Impact of Intraocular Lens Haptic Design and Orientation
12/19
Decentration & tilt at 3 month follow up (part 2)
- nasal decentration: 1 piece IOL 10 (67%)
3 piece IOL 10 (67%)- upward decentration was measured in most IOLs inboth group,2 IOLs in each group decenterd
downward- temporal tilted: 1 piece IOL7 (45%)
3 piece IOL 8 (57%)
- downward tilted: most of IOLs; 1 IOL in 1-pieceand 2 IOLs in 3-piece group were tilted upward
- no statistically significant about differrences indecentration and tilt between 2 groups IOL
-
8/3/2019 Impact of Intraocular Lens Haptic Design and Orientation
13/19
-
8/3/2019 Impact of Intraocular Lens Haptic Design and Orientation
14/19
Discussion
The first study to compare IOL axis orientationand to use Purkinje meter
The patient numbers may have been too small
to detect the effect of small or less relevantdifferences between the groups
In part 1 tendency toward nasal and upward
decentration on both groups & horizontaloriented IOL to decenter upward,especially at 3-months fu
-
8/3/2019 Impact of Intraocular Lens Haptic Design and Orientation
15/19
Because these findings, the IOL implant in part 2 wasoriented vertically
In part 2 most IOLs were tilted downward & slightlynasal
De Castro et al mostly nasal & upward decentration& nasally tilted
Mester et al:- 1-piece IOLnasal decentration & almost no vertical
displacement- crystalline lens temporal & downward displaced- both significantly up & temporal tilted
-
8/3/2019 Impact of Intraocular Lens Haptic Design and Orientation
16/19
Schaefel: temporal & inferior decentration; andsignificantly upward & temporal tilt
This study is slightly different with previous study
( Mester et al & Schaefel) in image acquisition andimage-analysis algorithm
Taketani et aldidnt find differences indecentration between 1-piece & 3-piece acrylic IOL
But the Scheimpflug imaging showed statisticallysignificant difference , where 3-piece tilted more
-
8/3/2019 Impact of Intraocular Lens Haptic Design and Orientation
17/19
Hayashi et aldidnt find differences betweendecenration & tilt of 1-piece & 3-piece PMMAIOLs using anterior eye segment analysis
3-piece IOLs have tendencey to decenter & tiltmore than 1-piece IOL
The reason :- production process of 3-piece IOLs, where duringthe PMMA haptic are placed into optic with handthan machine- because the haptic is PMMA, which is known tolose its memory within few days under compresion- haptic may be deformed during implantationprocedure, causing slight kinking of the haptic
-
8/3/2019 Impact of Intraocular Lens Haptic Design and Orientation
18/19
In this study:
- minimize the mechanical stress on haptics byenlarging wound in cases of high powered IOLwith greater optic thickness & not maneuveringIOL by touching / grasping haptic with forceps
- the IOL were position on the bag by pushingon the optic
-
8/3/2019 Impact of Intraocular Lens Haptic Design and Orientation
19/19
conclusion
Axis orientation of a plate-haptic IOL in the bagseemed to have no clinical impact because thereis no differences in decentration and tilt in this
study
Single-piece IOL maybe more predictable thanmultipiece IOLs in terms of tilt and
decentration confirm with a larger trial
top related