gmgw -1 · 2018. 7. 5. · click to edit master title style program development company © 2017...

Post on 31-Mar-2021

2 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Program Development Company © 2017

GMGW - 1

1st Geometry and Mesh Generation WorkshopDenver, CO June 3-4, 2017

Participants: VimalRaj Anbumani,Samuel Ebenezer James,Peter Robert Eiseman.

Company: Program Development Company

Participant id: 10

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Grid Contributions

Case Code Geometry model Grid type No. of grid

levelsHL-CRM Full Gap

CADfix - Geometry preparationGridPro - Volume Mesh IGES Structured

Multi-Block 3

HL-CRM Partially Sealed

CADfix - Geometry preparationGridPro - Volume Mesh IGES Structured

Multi-Block 3

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Geometry Preparation

• Software Used: CADfix• Format: IGES• Export Format: STL (for gridgeneration)

Why?Non matching faces with underlined nurbsRepair components that did not import properlyTo create refined tessellation as a base for Grid

Generation in GridPro

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Geometry Preparation

TE split for better tessellation

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Grid Generation

• Software Used: GridPro

• Type: Structured Multi-Block

• Algorithm: Dynamic Boundary Conformingtechnology(DBC)

• Topology Approach: Bottom up

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Grid Generation Process• Identified the critical regions first

Slat tip and mainelement deflection 2

Slat root and mainelement deflection 1

Gap betweentwo flaps

Flap tip and main element cavity

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Grid Generation Process• Guiding surface creation to capture sharp features

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Grid Generation Process

Block building

Start with interaction of slat tip and main element deflection 2

Extend to fuselage and main element tip

Start with Cavity and flap 2 tip

Extend to fuselage and main element tip

Step 1

Step 2

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Grid Generation ProcessMerged both Upstream and Downstream Topology

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Grid Generation Process

Once Merged Extended to farfield

Applied Boundary layer clustering

Merged grid blocks

CGNSExport

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Time Expended

Parameter Time (hrs)Geometry Cleanup 5 Block Construction 450

Grid generation 4Quality enhancement 20

Boundary layer clustering 1Block count reduction 4

Export to Solver format 1

Generating other grid resolution levels(for each level) 5

For one grid - Medium grid level

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Family of Grids

Input - Medium category Grid

Ratio based density sparsening and refining

Boundary Layer Clustering Merging blocks Export to CGNS

Total of 5 hours is utilized for each of the category

Coarse - 0.75x

Fine - 1.5x

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Quality parameters

• Grid convergence based on FOLDS and SKEW

• Avg. Skew = ~0.3 (Range = 0.05-0.99)

• 93.6% cells below 0.5 skew

• 0.02% cells above 0.9 skew

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Quality enhancement

• Wake capturing• Grid nodes adjustment manually as a post

processing• Boundary layer clustering - Constant growth

ratio as per guidelines

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Grid Summary

Geometry Block Count

Grid Level

Volume cells*

Surface cell faces*

Grid nodes* Folds Skew

HL-CRM Full Gap 1930

Coarse 8 0.16 8.1

0 0.05-0.98Medium 63 0.7 63.3

Fine 311.2 1.95 312.2

HL-CRM Partially Sealed

2086

Coarse 8.6 0.19 8.68

0 0.05-0.98Medium 70 0.78 70.4

Fine 320.7 2.19 321.8

*All values are in Millions

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Solver friendly

• Export format: CGNS• Set labels for boundary conditions as per

CGNS Solver• Blocks aligned to right handed orientation

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Wing Upper SurfaceFollowing images are from Full gap configuration

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Wing Lower Surface

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Slat LE at Root

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Flap TE at Root

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Wing tip LE

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Wing tip TE

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Flap Gap Upper Surface

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Volume Mesh at y = 277.5

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Volume Mesh at y = 638

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Volume Mesh at y = 1050

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Difficulties

• The pinch-out’s angles are impossible to mesh with good quality.

• Cell size criterion - Unable to achieve due to time limitation

• TE cell count limitation - poses difficulty in capturing the geometry for the curved tip in the coarse mesh.

• Volume to surface cell count ratio was not mentioned

• Limited resources

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Improvements• Refine the inlet region of the wing and

fuselage TE• Reduce the no. of singularities• Avoid unnecessary cell size jumps &

stretching

Program Development Company © 2017

PARTIAL GAP CONFIGURATION

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Wing Upper SurfaceFollowing images are from Partially Sealed configuration

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Wing Lower Surface

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Flap TE at Root

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Flap Gap Upper Surface

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Volume Mesh at y = 250

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Volume Mesh at y = 750

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Volume Mesh at y = 1000

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Volume Mesh at Flap Gap

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Flap Wake Refinement

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Summary

• Easy to achieve the family of grids• Difficult to attain high grid quality in the

critical regions(pinch outs & cavity)

Expectation:• Mention volume to surface cells ratio• Relax cell size limitation• Mention total cell count for each family

Program Development Company © 2017

Thank you

Any Questions

Click to edit Master title style

Program Development Company © 2017GMGW-1, Denver CO, June 2017

Some Advantages of Using GridPro

• No Surface Mesh generation• Smooth transition grid - DBC technology• Grid resolution friendly - only one grid needs

to be generated, rest can be generated in minutes

• Multi-scale analysis• Easy to modify existing mesh to

accommodate new features / components.

top related