glenn hills middle smart teams smart school faculty meeting
Post on 24-May-2015
480 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
RAISING STANDARDS FOR
ACADEMIC SUCCESS
Glenn Hills MiddleSchool
Compromising Excellence Is Not An Option!Glenn H. Andrews
Principal
DEVELOPING A PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY
Journey Toward Progress &
Academic Achievement
Professional Growth For Lifelong Learning
Compromising Excellence Is Not An Option!
Glenn H. AndrewsKim Davis
Jackie Holley
TO PROVIDE ACADEMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR ALL STUDENTS BY
ENSURING A POSITIVE EXPERIENCE TO BETTER PREPARE THEM FOR
SUCCESS AT THE HIGH SCHOOL LEVEL
Our Mission
Compromising Excellence Is Not An Option!
Glenn Hills Middle School
Organizational
Demographics
Student Body Total 713 Students
Free & Reduced Lunch 90%
Special Education Sub. 65 Students
Content Specialist 57 Teachers
Instructional Strategist 7 Teachers
Connections Teachers 12 Teachers
Academic Coaches 2 Coaches
Graduation Coaches 1 Coach
School Counselors 2 Counselors
Raising Standards Teachers 10 Teachers
Raising Standards Classrooms 9 Classrooms
Social Workers 1 Person
Compromising Excellence Is Not An Option!
Points of Pride Second place in the Science Bowl
Implemented the EBIS Program
Successful CRCT Night (2007-2008)
College & University Themes
Implementation of CRCT Blitz
Implementation of Raising Standards (GHMS)
Participation in the Principal Advisory Commission
Participation in the Richmond 2010 Initiative
Met Standards on CRCT in Reading/Language Arts
Met Standards for Attendance/Participation (CRCT)
Lady SeminolesCounty
Champions2007-2008
Compromising Excellence Is Not An Option!
Raising Standards For Academic Success
Organizational Flow Chart
“The Work of a Team is Only as
Good as its Effort”
Glenn Hills Middle School
JOURNEY TOWARD PROGRESS &
ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT
Adequate Yearly Progress
Glenn Hills Middle School
Updated Projections2008-2009
Discipline and
Attendance2008-2009
Compromising Excellence Is Not An Option!
J. Gordon HolleyFacilitator
STUDENT RETENTION SUMMARY
Journey Toward Academic Progress
Glenn Hills Middle School
Raising Standards For Academic Success
Student Retention Summary
Age Equivalence
Eight Grader (13-14)
Seventh Grader (11-12)
Sixth Grader (10-11)
Grade (8) 12 Students
Age 15 84 Students Age 14 168 Students Age 13 04 Students Age 12
Grade (7) 01 Student Age 15 12 Students Age 14 65 Students Age 13 134 Students Age 12
Grade (6) 01 Student Age 14 08 Students Age 13 46 Students Age 12 167 Students Age 11 02 Students Age 10
34 Students are @ risk for drop-out at
the high school level
Students have been retained once or twice at the elementary level
673 students are on target for graduation at the high school level.
Projections2008-2009
Needs Improvement
Year (9)
2007-2008 Math OverviewAll Students
Y
Black
Y
Hispanic White SWD
Safe Harbor Y
Econ. Disadv.
Confid. Interval Y
AMO 59.5 59.5 59.5 59.5 59.5 59.5
FAY 716 659 25 20 89 578
DID NOT MEET
40.2%
(288)
39.6%
(261)
44.0%
(11)
55.0%
(11)
67.4%
(60)
42.0%
(243)
Meet + Exceed
59.8%
(428)
60.4%
(398)
56.0%
(14)
45.0%
(9)
32.6%
(29)
58.0%
(335)
Projections2008-2009
Needs
Improvement
Year (9)
2007-2008 R/ELA OverviewAll Students *Y
Black
*Y
Hispanic White SWD
*N
Econ. Disadv.
*Y
AMO 73.3 73.3 73.3 73.3 73.3 73.3
FAY 714.5 657.5 25 20 89 576.5
DID NOT MEET
16.0%
(114.5)
16.0%
(105)
18.0%
(4.5)
17.5%
(3.5)
56.7%
(50.5)
17.0%
(98)
Meet + Exceed
84.0%
(600)
84.0%
(552.5)
81.6%
(20.5)
82.5%
(16.5)
43.3%
(38.5)
82.9%
(478.5)
Projections2008-2009
Needs
Improvement
Year (9)
2007-2008 SCI and SS Overview
All Students Science
All StudentsSocial Studies
Total Tested
788 779
DID NOT MEET
51.9%(409)
78.56%(612)
Meet + Exceed
48.1%(379)
21.44%(167)
Projections2008-2009
Needs
Improvement
Year (9)
2008-2009 Math AYP ProjectionsAll
Students Black Hispanic White SWD Econ.
Disadv.
AMO 59.5 59.5 59.5 59.5 59.5 59.5
Projected
FAY
708 673 10 15 65 594.72
Safe Harbor
Not an
Option
Not an
Option
Not an
Option
7.57 25.57 Not an
Option
AMO 421.26 400.44 6 8.92 38.68 353.85
AMO +10%
463.38 440.47 6.5 9.8 42.54 389.24
Projections2008-2009
Needs
Improvement
Year (9)
2008-2009 R/ELA AYP Projections
All Students
Black Hispanic White SWD Econ. Disadv.
AMO 73.3 73.3 73.3 73.3 73.3 73.3
Projected
FAY
708 673 10 15 65 594.72
Safe Harbor
Not an
Option
Not an
Option
Not an
Option
Not an
Option
31.83 Not an
Option
AMO 518.96 493.30 7.33 10.99 47.64 435.92
Last year +10%
654.19 621.85 9.02 13.61 52.40 546.25
Projections2008-2009
Needs
Improvement
Year (9)
2008-2009 SCI and SS AYP Projections
All Students Science
All StudentsSocial Studies
Total Tested
702 702
Goal 52.19%(366.3)
23.58%(165.53)
Goal +10 58.19%(408.5)
25.93%(182.02)
DEVELOPING AN EFFECTIVE DISCIPLINE PROGRAM THROUGH EFFECTIVE
INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICES
Discipline Referral Review
Raising Standards For Academic Success
2008-2009 School Year
Discipline2008-2009
Needs
Improvement
Year (9)
2008-2009 Discipline
Discipline2008-2009
Needs
Improvement
Year (9)
2008-2009 Discipline
Discipline2008-2009
Needs
Improvement
Year (9)
2008-2009 Discipline
Discipline2008-2009
Needs
Improvement
Year (9)
2008-2009 Discipline
Discipline2008-2009
Needs
Improvement
Year (9)
2008-2009 Discipline
# All % All # Major % Major # Minor % Minor
Students with 0 Referrals
657 93.59 % 657 93.59 % 702 100.00 %
Students with 1 Referrals
39 5.56 % 39 5.56 % 0.00 %
Students with 0 or 1 Referrals
696 99.15 % 696 99.15 % 702 100.00 %
Students with 2-5 Referrals
6 0.85 % 6 0.85 % 0.00 %
Students with 6+ Referrals
0 0.00 % 0 0.00 % 0.00 %
Students with 9+ Referrals
0 0.00 % 0 0.00 % 0.00 %
Discipline2008-2009
Needs
Improvement
Year (9)
2008-2009 Discipline
Discipline2008-2009
Needs
Improvement
Year (9)
2008-2009 Discipline
Attendance2008-2009
Needs
Improvement
Year (9)
2008-2009 Attendance
# of students with one or more abs 264
# of students with two to four abs 114
# of students with five or more abs 30
# of SWD with one abs 11
# of SWD with two abs 3
# of SWD with three abs 2
# of SWD with five abs 2
# of SWD with more than 10 abs 1
11 Students are in Alt School
1 student has missed 11 days
1 student has missed 5 days
1 student has missed 4 days
Team Attendance
Team Sick Personal Professional Staff Development Total
Clemson 3 4 3 3.5 13.5
GA Southern 1 3.5 4.5
Augusta State 13 2.5 15.5
SC State 6 1 4.5 11.5
Paine 7 5.5 12.5
Tuskegee 1 1 2.5 4.5
GA Tech 2.5 2 4 8.5
UGA 2 1 1 4
U of Tennessee 1.5 2 2 4.5
Connections 9 1 1.5 2 13.5
Total 46 8 8 32 96
STRATEGIC PLANS FOR PROGRESS &
ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT
Journey Toward Progress &
Academic Achievement
Smart Choices For Critical Times!
Glenn Hills Middle School
Kim DavisFacilitator
Common Mission, Vision, Values, and Goals
Assuring Achievement for ALL Students:
Systems for Prevention and Intervention
Collaborative Teaming Focused on Teaching
and Learning
Using Data to Guide Decision-making and
Continuous Improvement
Gaining Active Engagement from Family and
Community
Building Sustainable Leadership Capacity
Frequent Monitoring of Learning and
Teaching
Focused Professional Development
Eight Principles That Guide
Student Achievement In High Performing
Schools
Glenn Hills Middle SchoolAcademic and Instructional Priorities
Things We Do Well Things T
o
Impro
ve
• Accepted the Challenge: “Compromising Excellence is Not an Option”•Instructional Framework Foundation is in place.•Understand How to Utilize Data.
•Reaching the depth of the Instructional Framework and becoming pervasive, effective, and consistent in our delivery of instruction.•Compiling student data to gain a laser focus on instructional needs.•Focusing on “What do we do when students don’t meet standards?”
Professional Growth Plan Using SMART Goals
SSpecific & Strategic
What specifically am I trying to accomplish? What results do you want? How is it relevant to our mission?
MMeasurable
How will I measure when it is accomplished? Can the results be quantified?
AAchievable, Action-Oriented & Acceptable
Can I achieve this goal? Is it too high or too low? What are the action steps I will take to achieve it? Are all stakeholders, including myself, in agreement with the goal?
RRealistic & Results-Oriented
Is it possible and realistic within the specified timeframe? Are there any hindrances that are insurmountable?
TTime-Bound
When should the goal be completed? Does it have a starting point, ending point, and fixed duration?
Celebrating Success“Instructional Kings & Queens”
Mr. Streeter Mrs. Jackson
Instructional Kings & Queens
Mrs. Stark Mrs. Eastman
Incorporating the Instructional Framework using the Promethean Board
Raising Expectations in Physical Education
Coach Keep & Coach Mitchell
Developing Learning Teams Through Collaborative Planning
Professional Learning Communities
Smart Goal
Smart Teams
Smart School
Collaboration is a process we use to achieve shared goals.
Collaboration builds community, fuels motivation, renews the spirit, and enhances innovation.
Compromising Excellence Is Not An Option!
Learning Teams Focus Through Collaborative Planning
Learning Teams
South Carolina State University
Clemson University
University of Georgia
Georgia Tech
Augusta State University
Paine College
Howard University
Morehouse College
Spellman College
Voorhees College
University of Virginia
Tuskegee Institute
Fort Valley State
Compromising Excellence Is Not An Option!
Collaborative Planning Framework
Learning Teams
South Carolina State University
Clemson University
University of Georgia
Georgia Tech
Augusta State University
Pain College
Howard University
Morehouse College
Spellman College
Voorhees College
University of Virginia
Tuskegee Institute
Fort Valley State
The Process
Compromising Excellence Is Not An Option!
15 Minutes
20 Minutes
30 Minutes
THE POWER OF DEVELOPING SMART GOALS
Developing Site Based Leadership
A Smart Way of ThinkingDeveloping A Professional Learning
Community
Developing Site Based Leadership Through
Smart Goal
Smart Goals
Smart Choices For Critical
Times
Compromising Excellence Is Not And Option!
top related