get schools cooking grant program follow up · educational impact of breakfast ༝ experiencing...
Post on 23-Mar-2020
3 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Get Schools Cooking Grant Program Follow Up Kim Leung, RDN January 23rd 2019
Goals of the Assessment With consideration of the district’s primary goal to improve food quality, use fresh ingredients and fully transition to scratch-cooking:
q Assesses current conditions in the Food Services Department q Identifies Strengths q Identifies Key Challenges and Barriers to Change q Isolates Next Steps q Provides Strategies to Address Challenges q Provides Tools and Technical Assistance
What is the Vision?
Labor Efficiency & Increasing Participation
Specifically Breakfast!
Recommendation
Basic Aid Funding Impact on Food Services
Total Dollars
$
Students
Basic Aid Funded Districts Revenue
LCFF Funded Districts Revenue
Fixed Federal Reimbursement
& Costs
& Costs
Labor Efficiency
Proposed Reorganization
Savings
$76,000
Current Class Food Service Worker 2 Food Service Cashier
*some site hours change based on MPLH
School Site Reorganization
Revised Class Satellite Lead* Satellite Assistant*
*Classified position, states in job description “serves as the FS Director in their absence”
Central Kitchen
Current Class Current Hours Days
Assistant to the Director* 8.00 195
FSW III 8.00 182 FSW III 8.00 182
FSW III 8.00 182
FSW III 8.00 182
FSW III 7.00 182
FSW III 4.75 182
FS Driver 2.50 226 FS Driver 4.00 226
Total 58.25
Central Kitchen Reorganization
Revised Class Revised Hours Days
Supervisor 8.00 226
Production Cook 8.00 197 Production Cook 8.00 197
Production Cook** 8.00 197
Production Assistant 7.00 197
Production Assistant 7.00 197
Central Kitchen Utility 5.00 197
51.00
**Get Schools Cooking recommends to assess need for 3 vs 2 production cooks
Labor Efficiency & Increasing Participation
Specifically Breakfast!
1 out of every 5 kids does not eat breakfast.
Gleason, P., & Suitor, C. (2001). Children’s diets in the mid-1990s: Dietary intake and its relationship with school meal participation. Nutrition Assistance Program Report Series, No. CN01-CD1. Alexandria, VA: USDA, FNS, Office of Analysis, Nutrition and Evaluation. p 61.
71% of low-income K-12 students in SB County are reached by the National School Lunch Program, but only half take advantage of the breakfast program.
Santa Barbara County Food Action Plan 2016
Breakfast Participation
Educational Impact of Breakfast
“…SBPs have a positive effect on children's academic performance with clearest effects on mathematic and arithmetic grades in undernourished children. Increased frequency of habitual breakfast was consistently positively associated with academic performance.”
Educational Impact of Breakfast
༝ Experiencing hunger impairs children’s ability to learn. ༝ Eating school breakfast improves children’s attendance. ༝ Eating school breakfast improves behavior and learning
environments. ༝ Eating breakfast at school reduces tardiness and
absenteeism. ༝ Children who eat breakfast are more likely to maintain a
healthy body weight.
Chef Ann Foundation, The Lunch Box
Financial Impact of Breakfast $125,000
Increased revenue from 24-30% to 70% Free/Reduced student breakfast participation
Barriers to Breakfast
༝ Lack of time ༝ Lack of knowledge ༝ Lack of marketing ༝ Lack of equipment ༝ Transportation schedules ༝ Stigma ༝ Conflicting programs (before school clubs/
practices)
Breakfast Recommendations
༝ Increasing Participation ○ Transportation/Bus Schedules ○ Alternative Breakfast Models ○ Morning Activities
Summary Assessment of Food Services
Labor Breakfast Participation
- Alternative breakfast models - Busing schedules - Morning programming
- Reorganize Sites - Reorganize Central Kitchen
Questions? LunchLessons2018
top related