generating income from mangroves through climate change mitigation

Generating income from mangroves through

climate change mitigation

Dr. David J. GanzChief of PartyUSAID’s LEAF Program, Bangkokdganz@leafasia.org

Overview

Possible climate change mitigation activities

Carbon financing

Income for Coastal Communities for Mangrove Protection and Conservation

Introduction• Increasing interest in marketing carbon

from forests• Markets for other environmental services

are emerging but slow to develop (ex. PFES)

• Mangroves contain large amounts of carbon and have high sequestration rates in comparison with other forest types and land uses.

• A high proportion of carbon is contained in the soil and released with mangrove conversions.

Possible mitigation activities

REDD+ (reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation, conserving and enhancing carbon stocks and SFM)

Afforestation and reforestation

Increased use of harvested wood products for increased carbon stocks and fossil fuel substitution

Carbon financing

Voluntary Carbon Markets Corporate support

REDD+

Compliance mechanismClean Development Mechanism (CDM) only allows afforestation and reforestation, not REDD+

CDM does not include soil carbon for small projects (<16 000 tonnes CO2eyr-1 or ~500ha)

Changes to hydrology not allowed for small projects

Kyoto regime extended for 8 years to 2020

Validation and registration costs are very high (~$160,000 + $14,000 every 5 years for verification)

Voluntary carbon marketsThe Voluntary Carbon Standard (VCS) is the best recognised of the voluntary standards

Includes REDD+ and agriculture

Carbon credits verified under the VCS fetch higher prices than ETS systems that allow forest carbon.

Soil carbon can be included in small projects.

Peat rewetting methodology is now available so project should be able to take advantages of hydrological cycle changes (ex. Deserted fish ponds).

Key considerationsValue of carbon credits may not exceed $200/ha/yr even under the best conditions (>1000+ha to break even);

Value probably significantly less as up to 60% of credits may need to be kept in a ‘buffer’ depending on risk (10% of buffer is released every 5 years if risk proves to be low);

Costs of setting up institutional mechanism and distributing benefits also need to be considered; and

Policy and legislative support and carbon credit ownership needs to be clarified with relevant agencies.

Key considerationsCap and trade markets do not admit forest carbon credits and motivation for detailed quantification and accreditation remains low

REDD projects in threatened degraded mangrove areas with deep soils should generate most carbon credits

Projects on abandoned fish ponds may also make sense

Methodologies still need to be refined and carbon sequestration and storage is highly variable between and within mangrove areas and not well understood

Key considerationsDemand for CC mitigation and conservation remains and forest carbon initiatives have often been aimed at conservation and socio-economic development anyway

Investments associated with establishing community forestry in Cambodia average $54,900 per site

Corporate SupportSelling bundled services, a ‘sustainable development product,’ may represent a better opportunity

Direct CSR helping local communities

Popular in SE Asian context.

• Mangroves for the Future (MFF)• Food and Agriculture Organization

(FAO)• USAID’s Lowering Emissions in Asia’s

Forests (USAID LEAF)

Income for Coastal Communities for Mangrove Protection

• Thailand • Vietnam• Pakistan

Project Objective• To develop a low cost mechanism

enabling corporate investors to responsibly promote mangrove conservation, carbon emissions reduction and sustainable development through the provision of funding to local communities for livelihood diversification, resource enhancement and coastal protection.

Project Rationale• Mangroves contain large amounts of carbon• Coastal communities need support for alternative

livelihood development• Carbon prices are low and may not increase much in

the medium-term• Costs of entry into carbon markets is prohibitive for

small scale forestry projects • Demand for CC mitigation and conservation remains• Direct market mechanisms are needed.

Project Approach• Work in conjunction with existing

project/s to develop mechanism for wider replication.

• Seek broad institutional support to increase robustness and build confidence.

Output 1 – Improved understanding of conditions for establishing mangrove carbon

and livelihoods projects

• Activity 1.1 Inception WS/ Expert meeting

• Activity 1.2 Assessment of funding availability

• Activity 1.3 ‘Develop model that assesses the role of mangroves in carbon storage and sequestration’ – bypass measurement expenses.

Output 2 – Target communities identified, engaged and supported

Output 3 – A mechanism to incentivise mangrove conservation and benefit adjacent communities

Output 4 – Costs quantified and financing options developed

Output 4 – Implementation partners for regional replication

Thank you!