fy2010 asis it survey results

8/2/2019 FY2010 ASIS IT Survey Results

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fy2010-asis-it-survey-results 1/47

Survey Results& Analysis

AASHTO 2009 Fall IT Survey (FY2010 IT Survey)

Wednesday, November 04, 2009Pow ered by Vovici EFM

www.vovici.com

Executive Summary

This report contains a detailed statistical analysis of the results to the survey titled AASHTO 2009

Fall IT Survey. The results analysis includes answers from all respondents who took the survey in

the 49 day period from Tuesday, September 15, 2009 to Monday, November 02, 2009.

42 completed responses were received to the survey during this time.

Survey Results & Analysis

Survey: AASHTO 2009 Fall IT Survey (FY2010 IT Survey)

Author: Jan Edwards

Filter: Responses R eceived: 42

1) State or Province:

Those states and agencies who provided responses are denoted in green.

Alabama Kentucky North Dakota Alberta

Alaska Louisiana Ohio British Columbia

Arizona Maine Oklahoma Manitoba

Arkansas Maryland Oregon New Brunswick

California Massachusetts Pennsylvania Newfoundland, LabradorColorado Michigan Rhode Island Northwest TerritoriesConnecticut Minnesota South Carolina Nova Scotia

Delaware Mississippi South Dakota OntarioD.C. Missouri Tennessee Quebec

Florida Montana Texas SaskatchewanGeorgia Nebraska Utah Other

Hawaii Nevada Vermont Idaho New Hampshire Virginia

Illinois New Jersey Washington

Indiana New Mexico West Virginia

Iowa New York Wisconsin

Kansas North Carolina Wyoming

2) Contact Information (Agency Name, Contact Name, and Division must be provideas minimum):

(Removed for publication)

3) Please identify the following additional key personnel:

Technical Support Manager

Tech Support Mgr Telephone Tech Support Mgr Email Address

AK Brian Idzik

Princess

Harper

334‐260‐

5266 harperp@dot.state.al.us

Sidney

501‐569‐

2260 Sidney.Foggo@arkansashighways.com

AZ Tami Price

(602) 712

7170 TPrice@azdot.gov

Marion

McLellan

303 757‐

9456 Marion.mclellan@dot.state.co.us

NC David Dietz

919 707‐

2011 DNDietz@ncdot.gov

DE Vacant N/A N/A

Wilson

Dilmore

850‐414‐

4292 wilson.dilmore@dot.state.fl.us

Espeland

(515) 239‐

1583 Barbara.Espeland@dot.iowa.gov

Jenkins

Swartzman

785‐296‐

3727 sue.swartzman@ksdot.org

KY Jon Clark

502‐564‐

8900 jon.clark@ky.gov

Tyrone

Carter Tyrone.Carter@la.gov

MD Guy Reihl

410 787‐

7739 greihl@mdot.state.md.us

ME Eric Erskine

207 624‐

3165 eric.erskine@maine.gov

Nathan

Buckwalter,

517‐335‐

2407 BuckwalterN@michigan.gov

Moreland

651‐366‐

5646 john.moreland@state.mn.us

MO Jack Morris 573522‐2624 Jack.Morris@modot.mo.gov

Denise

Jones 6013597419 dbjones@mdot.state.ms.us

MT Jeff Sillick 4064447265 jsillick@mt.gov

Gunsch 7013284424 dgunsch@nd.gov

NE Joe Kellner

402‐479‐

4650 joe.kellner@nebraska.gov

NJ Keith Hill keith.hill@dot.state.nj.us

Louis Garcia

505‐827‐

louis.j.garcia@state.nm.us

NY Pat Canaday

518‐457‐

2800 pcanaday@dot.state.ny.us

Aditya

Singhal 614.466.7007 Aditya.Singhal@dot.state.oh.us

Virginia

Alster

503‐986‐

3196 virginia.m.alster@odot.state.or.us

DeMatt

717‐787‐

3435 mdematt@state.pa.us

Fraginis 222‐6935 gfraginis@dot.ri.gov

SC Lee Foster (803)737

1044 fosterml@scdot.org

Dustin

615‐253‐

6408 Dustin.Heath@tn.gov

TX Mitch Pope

512‐465‐

7558 mpope@dot.state.tx.us

VA Pam Tauer pam.tauer@vdot.virginia.gov

Jim Wood,

Infrastrature

808‐828‐

jim.wood@state.vt.us

Bonnie

608‐266‐

8224 bonnie.hauke@dot.wi.gov

Kimble 3045589526 steve.b.kimble@wv.gov

WY Dave Birge

307‐777‐

3878 dave.birge@dot.state.wy.us

Applications Manager

Applications Mgr Telephone Applications Mgr Email Address

AK Steve Rice

Debbie

Hornsby

334‐242‐

6885 hornsbyd@dot.state.al.us

Frymark

501‐569‐

2491 Lesa.Frymark@arkansashighways.com

Stroops

(602) 712‐

6723 DStroops@azdot.gov

Kerstetter

303 757‐

9482 frank.kerstetter@dot.state.co.us

Jennings

512‐467‐

3837 tjenning@dot.state.tx.us

Ellett

Pollard Ellett.Pollard@vdot.virginia.gov

Nailor

802‐828‐

0180 shawn.nailor@state.vt.us

Longfield

608‐266‐

2433 diana.longfield@dot.wi.gov

WV Sush

Pakvasa 3045589522 sush.pakvasa@wv.gov

WY AJ Myers

307‐777‐

4130 aj.myers@dot.state.wy.us

GIS Manager GIS Mgr

Telephone GIS Mgr Email Address AK

Kirkpatrick

Simonton

334‐260‐

simontont@dot.state.al.us

Raymond

501‐569‐

2554 Raymond.Leung@arkansashighways.com

Stroops

(602) 712‐

6723 DStroops@azdot.gov

303 757‐

9811 tamela.lang@dot.state.co.us

NC John Farley

919 707‐

2151 FCFarley@ncdot.gov

DE Don Burris

302‐760‐

2629 don.burris@state.de.us

Causseaux

850‐245‐

1715 jared.causseaux@dot.state.fl.us

IA Eric Abrams

(515) 239‐

1949 Eric.Abrams@dot.iowa.gov

IL Dan Wilcox 2175240031 Dan.Wilcox@illinois.gov

IN Joel Bump

KS Brian Logan

785‐296‐

4899 brian.logan@ksdot.org

KY Will Holmes

502‐564‐

8900 will.holmes@ky.gov

LA Jim Mitchell Jim.Mitchell@gov

Krisanne

McConnell,

517‐373‐

7910 McconnellK1@michigan.gov

Weinberger

651‐366‐

4121 paul.weinberger@state.mn.us

Arnold

Williams

573‐751‐

7012 Arnold.Williams@modot.mo.gov

Russell

Cooke 6013597413 rcooke@mdot.state.ms.us

MT Vacant

ND Brian Bieber 7013282649 bbieber@nd.gov

NE Rose Braun

402‐479‐

3696 rose.braun@nebraska.gov

Gulbinsky mark.gublinsky@dot.state.nj.us

Don Padilla

NY Kevin Hunt

518‐457‐

2800 khunt@dot.state.ny.us

Blackstone

614‐466‐

2594 Dave.Blackstone@dot.state.oh.us

Ringeisen

503‐986‐

DeSendi

717‐787‐

3738 fdesendi@state.pa.us

RI Steve Kut 222‐6935 skut@dot.ri.gov

Anderson

(803)737‐

1383 AndersonRT

McDonough

615‐741‐

4037 Kim.McDonough@tn.gov

Darryl

Zercher

512‐467‐

3782 dzerche@dot.state.tx.ux

VA Joe Pugh joe.pugh@vdot.virginia.gov

VT Rick Scott

802‐828‐

3969 rick.scott@state.vt.us

WI Mike

Gilchrist 608‐

267‐

3276 michael.gilchrist@dot.wi.gov

Hussein

Elkhansa 3045589657 hussein.s.elkhansa@wv.gov

Garcia

307‐777‐

4231 vince.garcia@dot.state.wy.us

Security Manager Security Mgr

Telephone Security Mgr Email Address

Monagle

Neslein 334‐242‐6034 nesleinr@dot.state.al.us

Mitchell 501‐569‐2040 Ron.Mitchell@arkansashighways.com

Thomas

Branham

(602) 712‐

6349 TBranham@azdot.gov

Rivera 303 757‐9586 thomas.rivera@dot.state.co.us

Stratton

Lindley 919 707‐2090 SLindley@ncdot.gov

Rhonda

Ringer 302‐760‐2607 Rhonda.Ringer@state.de.us

Joseph

Cipriani 850‐414‐4011 joe.cipriani@dot.state.fl.us

Covington

(515) 239‐

1989 Debra.Covington@dot.iowa.gov

Swinford

Kritikos 785‐296‐3727 bill.kritikos@ksdot.org

Noe 502‐564‐8900 laura.noe@ky.gov

Jubin John.Jubin@la.gov

Kendra

Silsby,

MDIT 517‐241‐0019 SilsbyK@michigan.gov

Dahlen 651‐366‐4034 linda.dahlen@state.mn.us

Victoria

Harding 573‐522‐1345 Victoria.Harding@modot.mo.gov

Denise

Jones 6013597419 dbjones@mdot.state.ms.us

Kristi

Antosh 4064446294 kantosh@mt.gov

Zimprich 7013283229 ezimpric@nd.gov

Neemann 402‐479‐3659 mark.neemann@nebraska.gov

NJ N/A

Roybal 505‐827‐5659 eric.roybal@state.nm.us

Thurley 518‐457‐2800 jthurley@dot.state.ny.us

Taylor 614.387.0725 Jack.Taylor@dot.state.oh.us

Karina

Stewart 503‐986‐4397

717‐787

‐5575

joblack@state.pa.us

Quaglieri 462‐9202 equaglieri@dot.ri.gov

Dempsey

(803)737‐

1054 dempseyrk@scdot.org

Dustin

Judy B.

Skeen,

P.E. 512‐465‐7491 jskeen@dot.state.tx.us

Austin jim.austin@vdot.virginia.gov

britsch 608‐267‐2097 herb.britsch@dot.wi.gov

Thomas 3045582841 fred.w.thomas@wv.gov

Miller 307‐777‐3868 jason.miller@dot.state.wy.us

4) If the information is readily available, please provide the following high-levelorganizational information for your agency. If development of theinformation requested in this question is too tim e consuming, or you do notknow a particular item, please leave the item blank/ empty.

Number of individuals

within Agency Overall Agency

Operating Budget ($)

Number of Agency IT individuals

providing application development

Number of Agency IT

individuals providing technical

support Overall Agency

IT Operating Budget ($)

Overall Agency IT

Capital Budget ($)

AK 3,738 530,967,900 30 32 17,601,700 650,000

AL 4300 20 million 100 90 200 thousand

AR 3593 303,643,393 16 11 6,055,000 2,300,000

AZ 4800 54 60 9000000

CO 3,300 $860 million 11 71 $14.5 million $1,075,000

DE 2500 $343,875,500 47 48 $8,843,700 $7,788,000

FL 7426 $6.5B 100 200 $42.5M $1.7M

IA 3,489 $332,218,000 67 56 $29,758,000 $4,995,000

ID 1883 10 20

IL 5500 50 20 25,000,000

KS 3113 1547486068 58 37 13000000 3000000

KY 4500 1.9B 20 25 28M Multi year

LA 4700 20 19

MB 3,500 17 6 $14,000,000.00

ME 2200 13 13

MI 2900 $3.6B 75 75 $24M $4.5M

MN 5000 2.2 billion 21 200 22 million

MO 6300 $2.88B 45 45 $20M $16M

MS 3500 1.2 billion 20 47 16.2 million 2.1 million

MT 2250 650000000 30 20 10000000 2000000

NC 15,000 4B 243 95 65M ‐

ND 1052.5 10 8 17 million 6 million

NE 2200 693,000,000 20 65 10,600,000 5,100,000

NM 2700 $800M 20 50 $18M 0

NY 8000 100 100 30M

OH 6031 2,878,684,628 41 21 25,330,335 3,000,000 ('sh)

OR 4500 $1.5b/yr 120 60 $55m

PA 12,000 > $6B 85 115 Approx $72M Approx $25M

RI 700+ 8 5

SC 5000 1000000000 30 15 11000000

TN 4,500 30 40 33M

TX 14,710 8.1 billion 617 included 186.2 million 105.8 million

UT 1670 275300000 30 27 9424600 0

VA 8,000 $3.5 billion 120 25 $70,000 0

VT 1300 9 30 $2m $12m

WI 3500 83 67

WV 5372 1,522,00,00 20 8 3,600,000 7,200,000

WY 2000 16 20

5) Where is control and/ or support of your IT functions located?

6) If your agency outsources its IT functions (seat management, development,operations, etc.) to a centralized agency or to an ou tside/ industry company,how successful is the effort? Please provide additional comments (monetarysavings achieved, etc.) if deemed useful.

Comment Responses:

I was concerned with the switch to centralized e‐mail but it has been working out well for us.

Response time much worse on all centralized functions

Functions that we have outsourced are successful; functions we have centralized (from the DOT) are not very

successful.

Iowa is studying going to a central e‐mail service model, either from an internal provider or SaaS.

telephone maintenance

gets to be very costly

Still requires knowledgeable in‐house staff to particpate in planning, upgrades, change management, monitoring,

TxDOT has not realized cost savings for outsourced functions. Service has degraded and we have experienced data

loss, poor server monitoring, delays in restoring services, and increased windows for hardware and software

procurements and deployments.

We outsource about 50% of IT development.

The state of Florida is undergoing data center consolidation. Currently at the planning stage.

High price ‐ low customer service levels

7) What key performance indicators (KPI ) does your agency use to gauge ITsupport levels?

Other Responses:

Web activity

Customer satisfaction surveys

Follow

satisfaction

surveys

Application development completion time

customer survey

Restre time

Customer satisfaction surveys;

Satisfaction surveys

8) What type of return on investment (ROI) information does your agencyrequire for new IT purchases / projects?

Other Responses:

Based upon project size and scope

no specific, but ROI is documented

We calculate ROI; not controlling factor

Cost-benefit analysis and life cycle cos

Does project help drive business results

Soft Costs

system specific

ROI, Cost Recovery are'nt equvlnt. terms

generally determine ROI inform user

we use roi as a factor in selecting proj

ROI required for projects over $1M.

No formal reqmt - Prioritize ROI & Value

ROI is dependent on life cycle analysis

We do Cost/Benefit -not particularly ROI

9) If your agency requires ROI information, are "soft" costs (time savings inwork producti on, convenience to customer base, e.g.) allow ed in thecalculations?

10) Please list the top one or tw o IT application development orimplementation projects your agency plans to undertake in the next 1 - 2years:

Project 1 Description Project 2 Description

Implement changes in State Peoplesoft ERP system to

meet specific DOT requirements

Right of Way workflow and document management

system.

conprehensive project tracking package construction management

Rewrite of Electronic Accident Form and Accident Records

System

Implementation of a workflow solution for our Highway

Improvement Programming Request form

DMV Workflow system, contracted out MAT, asset management system as an enterprise

application

New state‐wide ERP system. Migration off legacy systems.

New Vehicle

Registration/titling

system.

project

duration, .net,c#, Web Based. 3M contractor. Right of Way system. Internal, .net, c#, web based.

Driver License Security Improvements Wis. Motor Carrier Registration systems

Bridge Management System Implementation

On‐Line Bid Submission application. This includes on‐line

advertising, letting and bid‐tabs publication.

Statewide Intelligent Transportation System (ITS)

Management Software (SIMS) Project – The SIMS project

provides the Iowa DOT with an integrated, statewide

Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) software solution,

as part of an Advanced Traffic Management System

(ATMS). This

system

provides

remote

control

devices

such as cameras, changeable message boards, and

highway advisory radios for current and planned ITS

deployments.

IAPS –Iowa Automated Permitting System – IAPS will be a

web based application that automates the request and

review process for issuing oversize/overweight permits.

IAPS will include functionality from our legacy system of

receiving permit requests via fax and the web, managing

the issuing permit process, billing and reporting

capabilities.

include

following

enhancements: automated routing for oversize/overweight

loads, allow web users to manage their own account data

and self issue permits, give all users involved in the

approval process access to permits that requires their

review, and expanded billing and reporting features.

Implement Bid Express. Rewrite District Bookkeeping System.

SiteManager Implmentation. Migration from our current

inhouse developed Construction Management system

over to the SiteManager application.

Roadway Inventory

SAP / Agile Assets implementation Trns.port CRLMS

Business Intelligence

system

Talent

Management

PIMARS‐ Project Information Management and Reporting

System

AMMO‐ Accountability in Maintenance Management

Operations.

HR Integrated Data ‐‐integrate multiple disparate HR

applications and databases such that users enter data

once and can report across multiple data.

Real Estate Mgmt System ‐‐system to manage Right‐of ‐

Way parcels statewide, using county and MoDOT data,

giving graphical, map based input/output capabilities

Business Intelligence None

Asset Management ‐ comparing Tier I (roads & bridges),

Tier II, and Tier III to determine best use of expenditure.

Travel Information Map ‐ combining multiple layers to one

centric map.

Project Delivery and Development Reporting System. Automated Traffic Management System. Will support

Includes ARRA reporting, for stimulus projects, eventually

extended to all PennDOT project; also includes project

delivery metrics, cash flow and business intelligence

components.

interconnectivity for all regional Traffic Management

Centers and ITS devices, which currently operate

independently and on diverse software and hardware

infrastructures.

IT Assest Management

Data Mart Development ‐ This initiative integrates data

from several mainframe databases into a user friendly

format. It gives users the capabality of running their own

queries and

reports.

Traveler Service Portal ‐ This initiative will provide a wide

range of services to people who commute and simply

travel through Illinois.

Implement Web based Transport tools. Move from MicroStation/V8 to MicroStation/XM.

DMV Technology Modernization Electronic Toll Collection System Replacement

BI replacement Web Transport

FINESS ‐ Capital Improvement Financial System (Federal

Billing)

GIS Web Framework. Develop a programming framework

for incorporating mapping and spatial functionality into

existing MaineDOT applications and to streamline the

process of building new mapping applications.

Enterprise Content Management Data Integration/Business Data Warehouse

Enterprise Asset Management NYS Financial Management System

HOV tolling.

Enhancements to Datawarehouse and integrating of

application systems throughout UDOT. Higher integration

with other state agencies.

DMV System Upgrade ‐ Mainframe migration. New Highways Pavement and Maintenance Management

system.

continued development of the Integrated Transportation

Management System

continued development of the Highway Maintenance

Management System

Enterprise Financial Management System Highway Performance Management System

Data Center Migration ‐ Migrate NJDOT specific hardware

to the

Centralized

environment.

Transportation Management System Data

Integration/DataWarehouse‐ Integration of 8

Transportation Management

Systems

DataWarehouse

Transportaion Operation Center, this is consolodating all

of our dispatch center software packages into one overall

integrated system

Transinfo, this is implementing Exors's asset management

system into ODOT and allowing us to retire two legacy

asset management systems.

Installation of ITS cameras statewide GIS points and implementation

Routebuilder replacement‐ this replace a legacy system

that provides inter and intra state permitting for over the

road truckers.

Program & Project Management System ‐ this will replace a

legacy system that tracks pre‐construction work tasks.

TxDOT is participating in a statewide ERP effort led by the

state comptroller. For more information see

http://www.texaserp.org/.

TxDOT has a major initiative underway to increase

transparancy on department operations to citizens, state

leadership, legislators,

stakeholders.

Michigan Transport Routing & Internet Permits (MiTRIP) ‐

Application that will provide the department increased

ability to process and manage oversize/overweight

transport permits.

FieldManager Rewrite ‐ Rewrite the application to

automate the approval process for certain FieldManager

reports to include the Construction Pay Estimate Report,

Contract Modification and Contractor Performance.

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)

Inspection Report (MDOT form 1126) in addition to

significant user suggested enhancements will be included.

Upgrade of Oracle E‐business suite financials

REAL ID/PASS ID Falcon ‐ Document Management implementation state

New Cash Forecasting System New Intermodal Management System

Enterprise Content Management Data Integration, Data Warehousing

Marine Highway (Ferry) Reservation System Document Management

SiteManager for Materials and Test Statewide Environmental Management System

11.1) Application Development

Comment Responses:

right of way system

Human Resources

Datawarehouse, apps. integration

HPMS Federal Reporting SystemMarine Highway (Ferry) Reservation System

12) Please list the top one or tw o IT infrastructure projects your agency plansto undertake in the next 1 - 2 years.

Project 1

Description

Project 2

Description

VOIP Upgrade server/SAN hardware

Server Virtualization Windows & Upgrade

Office 2007 VM, blade technology

New off ‐site disaster recovery site. Continued build‐out of our ITS systems.

Continued Virtualization Disaster recovery

Server Co‐location

This is now a centraized function, not in DOT's control. This is now a centraized function, not in DOT's

control.

Desktop / Application Virtualization ‐ Compare Microsoft's

desktop virtualization solution as a replacement for Citrix.

Implement winning solution in a server cloud that will support

300 thin client desktops and 1500 desktop users.

Optimization

Upgrade‐

Convert data

from Frame Relay and ATM to Ethernet, replacing

and upgrading older router equipment. Install

Riverbed WAN optimization devices at all large

offices statewide. Install client WAN optimization as

needed.

Upgrade backbone network to 10 GB Ethernet. Implement virtual servers.

Server Consolidation Deployment for the Cleveland/Akron ITS

Server Consolidation Network Upgrade

Server upgrades Office 2007 upgrade

Virtualization VMware Cisco Network Upgrade

Next Generation Desktop (NGD) ‐upgrade 5200

Desktops/Laptops to Windows7, Active Directory 2008, SCCM,

Office 2007 and a first time implementation of Sharepoint 2007,

all enterprise‐wide.

Enterprise‐wide Voice Over IP (VOIP)deployment.

SAP expansion

None due to budget situation and IT consolidation

throughout the Executive Branch.

VoiP and Windows XP to Windows 7 AVL and camera increasement

Statewide Connectivity for TMC's. Includes network solution to

run on Commonwealth network, or build separate; also includes

video distribution and sharing policies and solution.

Web Services for Law Enforcement. Will implement

web service solution to provide driver and vehicle

information to law enforcement entities; includes

replacement of interface to legacy DL and VR

mainframe systems.

Mainframe Upgrade Data Storage Technology Upgrade

Roadway Weather Information Systems VOIP

Implement the Primavera software. Install and Configure updated Engineering Plotters.

Server Consolidation/Virtualization Computer Room Upgrade

New Content Management Environment

Server Migration project ‐ migrate over half the MeDOT Oracle

databases into an Oracle RAC environment.

Desktop Operating System Upgrade Server Virtualization

Consolidation and virtualization of all servers in the State. Integration of data, voice, video networks.

Migration to MPLS on statewide network

continued deployment of a new statewide network

infrastructure in conjunction with the new traffic engineering

system Intelligent Transportation System(cameras,signs,traffic

counters, centralized traffic controllers, tmcs)

complete development of agency Hot Site/ recovery

IT Infrastructure

Transformation

Datacenter Migration/Consolidation

Upgrade network wiring from Category 2 to Category

5e in a local facility.

PC Encryption Windows 7 and Office 2010

VOIP Virtualization

Data Center Consolidation

Texas outsourced server support functions to IBM. In the near

future, TxDOT's servers will be migrated to two central state

data centers. The impact on application performance and

network loads are critical factors that have not been fully

analyzed or

addressed.

TxDOT is reorganizing central and field support

functions. Work loads are expected to be distributed

across virtual teams working in virtual office

environments. This is expected to place a much

greater load on TxDOT's WAN and could lead to

major WAN redesign.

Michigan/1 Active Directory Office Platform Technology (M/1)‐

Move the department to the consolidated enterprise

(statewide) environment which will provide new and more

standardized server and desktop computing as well as

streamlined training, procurement and support services.

Systems Access Manager, aka Identity Management

(SAM/IME)‐ Establish a single/common standard

identity managemement solution across the entire

MDOT enterprise to manage user authentication

and/or user access to all new and existing business

applications.

Exchange Server Enterprise Backup Solution/Disaster Recovery

Moving to virtual environment ‐ XEN server Email replacement ‐ may be centralized at the state

Statewide E‐mail consolidation Statewide data center consolidation

Server Computing

Virtualization

upgrade servers for database and web services upgrade servers for file and print services

Remote Disaster Recovery site implementation

13.1) Infrastructure

Comment Responses:

Disaster Recovery

800 MHz Radio

Help with Project Tracking.

Facility Upgrade

security

SECURITY*** for Project 2

14) Does your agency have a need for new application development oracquisit ion in any of the following business areas?

Other Responses:

Sharepoint implementation across enterprise.

MS Accountability and Transparency Act

15) Is your state considering or pursuing application hosting (software as aservice) for critical line of business appli cations?

16) Is your agency facing software procurement restrictions as a result of Section 508 compliance laws and/ or policies?

17.1) Database(s)

17.2) Database(s)

18) Please describe any major changes in database platforms anticipated byyour agency. Also, please include any supported and/ or preferreddatabases omitted from the above question.

Please describe any major changes in database platforms anticipated by your agency. Also, please include any supported and/or preferred databases omitted from the above question.

We will be moving our remaining LAN databases from DB2 to SQL. One of our last moves will be when the TRNSPort

suite of products is finally moved to SQL.

We are working to completely migrate from DB2.

Slow migration to SQL Server since we have pretty well become a MS environment. Oracle will continue to be

supported.

Migration off Filehandler (an in‐house developed DBMS). Migration off IMS (legacy applications are gorwing

risk/concern.)

No changes planned.

CA‐IDMS installation is being sunset over the next 6 years. No new development on the platform. _DB2 will be sunset

in 2 years.

We support CA Datacom on the mainframe.

Migration from Sybase SQL Server over to Microsoft SQL Server

Increased use of Microsoft SQL Server, will continue to use DB/2 and Oracle.

Change to Microsoft SQL Server.

We are moving from IBM AIX server based Oracle DB's to Intel Linux Oracle RAC

No changes planned.

We still have a number of legacy IMS databases which we support, but will not further develop. We intend to replace

these databases with a relational database through planned re‐engineering projects over the next five years.

adabas/natural for existing mainframe applications

No major change in db strategy: Major systems will use Oracle, all others will use MS SQL Server

TxDOT's primary mainframe database is ADABAS.

Migrate Oracle to SQL

19) When does your agency intend to util ize 64 bit processing for desktops?

Comment Responses:

A few workstations will be put into production before July 2010. All new systems rolledout in FY11 will be 64 bit.

64-bit is being used on CADD desktops only at this point. We have no plans for non-

CADD desktops.

20) When does your agency intend to implement W indows 7?

Comment Responses:

Consolidated central control.

A few workstations will be put into production before July 2010. All new systems rolled out in FY11 will be Windows

1st qtr 2011

Desktop OS and office suite upgrades are planned for FY 2011.

21) Which server operating systems are being supported by your agency?Which products are preferred by your agency?

Comment Responses:

Central support on unix servers

Windows Server

‐which

discontinued

Windows 2000

22.1) Production

22.2) % of Production Servers Virtualized

22.3) Test/ Development

22.4) % of Test/ Development Servers Virtualized

23) What solution are you basing your virtualization strategy on? (check allthat apply)

Other Responses:

Virtual Iron

We are evaluating leading solutions.

AIX LPARS

moving

VMWare

Hyper ‐ V

Citrix

Citrix Xen Server

24) What new or emerging technologies do you foresee occurring orimplementing in the near future?

What new

emerging

technologies

foresee

occurring

implementing

future?

Sharepoint or workplace collaboration.

Tapeless backup, SAN mirroring, Riverbed WAN Optimization, wake on LAN

Cloud computing shows some promise if concerns can be worked out.

Increased use of mobile devices for maintenance activities.

1. Click Once 2. Smart Client 3. Model view content (MVC)

Cloud Computing Unified Communications Sharepoint‐Email integration Mobile applications development

4G Wireless will provide greater opportunities with Video Streaming.

Wider use

wireless

devices

wireless

laptops

‐berries.

Generally speaking, we don't deploy new technologies. We prefer to wait until technologies have been proven, are

stable, and are less expensive to implement.

A continued shift from Client/Server to Thin Client WEB. MS Sharepoint.

VoIP, desktop virtualization

Sharepoint Collaboration

Business Intelligence

1. Point‐to‐point wireless with ITS. 2. Cellular modems using 4G. 3. Tracking equipment with GPS. 4. Creating models

to support automated machine guidance.

Email Archiving

desktop virtualization; application virtualization

Our hands are tied by our oversight agency standards. Also budget constraints make new technology rather

unattractive at this time.

25) Are you using or considering using web 2.0 social networking technologiesto disseminate information either internally or externally?

26) If so, which social network ing technologies are you using? (Choose all thatapply)

Other Responses:

Our own online community

Google is not a SN, but using in prodctn

SharePoint

internal

Flickr

28) Are you designing or modifying applications for mobile devices?

30) If AASHTOWare w ere developed using LDAP for authentication, wou ld itpresent a problem to your agency?

Comment Responses:

Prefer kerberos for authentication

KYTC uses AD, prefer single signon

enough

comment.

Would prefer AD, but if LDAP ties, OK

Depends on the design and implementation

32) Please provide any additional information or comments desired; include anyadditional topics/ questions that you would like to see added or changesyou w ould like to see incorporated into this survey.

Please provide any additional information or comments desired; include any additional topics/questions that you would like to see added or changes you would like to see incorporated into this survey. None..

Comments for #30: LDAP compatibility will be mandatory for all Iowa applications which have users who log in from

outside the agency and the preferred method for all users inside the agency.

AASHTOWare projects should be awarded through an RFP process to ensure competitive pricing and to eliminate

vendor complacency.

Item#1‐ Question #4 needs to ask about the number of non‐State staff (contractors or outsourced) used to augment

State IT staff to get a true picture of IT staffing resources. Also, More and more IT costs are embeded in a centralized

rate so direct capital costs are very limited and hard to identify.

Generated: 11/4/2009 12:16:01 PM

fy2010 asis it survey results

Documents

fy2010 results presentation - abc.es

fy2010 results announcement

videoconferencia asis actualización asis 2017 · el...

1h fy2010 results briefing 16 december 2009. operational...

fy2010 newburyport annual report

tokai carbon fy2010 results

asis chief sec officer asis standard

fy2010 results...

rkl annual report fy2010

bombardier q2 fy2010-11

fy2010 program plan

u.s. department of the interior u.s. geological survey...

may25，2012...1q,fy2010 2q,fy2010 3q,fy2010 4q,fy2010...

emco asis. emco asis. -...

11/6/2015 fy2010 final budget · 11/6/2015 fy2010 final...

fy2013 asis it survey results

el pobre de asis nikos kazantzakis (francisco de asis)

79thannualreport-bhl - fy2010

basf fy2010 results

ffb financial statements fy2010