fight against corruption: the lithuanian way
Post on 31-Jan-2016
20 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION:
THE LITHUANIAN WAY
CONTENTS
Factors
Decision
Challenges
Dilemmas
Priorities
FACTORS
FACTORS
External globalisation fall of the Berlin Wall diffusion: East – West
Internal freedom procedures mentality integration into the EU, NATO
CONCLUSIONS
Corruption becomes a global concern “Young” democracies: favourable conditions for corruption “Old” democracies: unprepared for a new challenge Compatibility of the young and the old: a generation gap Untraditional thinking Pro-active systems, quickly responding to changes and changing the environment for their own benefit
DECISION
CR
IMIN
AL
PR
OS
EC
UT
ION
PR
EV
EN
TIO
N
ED
UC
AT
ION
STT
GOVERNMENT
GENERAL PUBLIC
C O R R U P T I O N
PRESIDENT PARLIAMENT
ANTI-CORRUPTION SYSTEM
Special Investigation Service (STT)
Independent body
Independent investigations
Three equally important pillars: criminal prosecution prevention education
Co-ordinating body
DIRECTIONS
Direction Target Tool Result Objective
Criminal prosecution
Consequences Effective capacities
Today Quick, thorough and lawful detection of corruption crimes
Prevention Causes Perfect systems and procedures
Long-term(oriented towards tomorrow)
In cooperation with other bodies in public and private sector, detection and elimination of pre-conditions of corruption
Education Causes of causes
High moral standards
“Forever” Development of overall intolerance towards corruption
CO-ORDINATION
STT
PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
Sectors
STT STRUCTURE
Director
1st Deputy Director
Operational Activities Dept
Deputy Director
Regional OfficesRegional Offices
Administrative Dept
Corruption Prevention Dept
Planning Division
Finance Division
Internal Audit Unit
Security Division
DIREKTORIUS
Patarėjas
Spaudos atstovas
DIREKTORIAUSPAVADUOTOJAS
(Baudžiamasis persekiojimas)
DIREKTORIAUSPAVADUOTOJAS
(Resursų planavimas ir vidausadministravimas)
DIREKTORIAUSPAVADUOTOJAS
(Prevencija, švietimas, pareiškėjųaptarnavimas)
Operatyvinės veikloslogistikos valdyba
Žvalgybos valdyba
Vilniaus valdyba
Kauno valdyba
Klaipėdos valdyba
Šiaulių valdyba
Panevėžio valdyba
Administravimo valdyba
Planavimo skyrius
Finansų skyrius
Korupcijos prevencijosvaldyba
Pareiškimų nagrinėjimovaldyba
Švietimo ir ryšių suvisuomene skyrius
Vidaus audito skyrius
Saugumo skyrius
Visuomeninė konsultantų taryba
Projektas 06 -03-23PROGNOZUOJAMAS STT STRUKTŪROS PROJEKTAS 2006-2012 METAMS
Operatyvinio patikrinimo skyrius
Aprūpinimo skyrius
Metodinis skyrius
Žvalgybos skyrius
Strateginės analizės skyrius
Ikiteisminio tyrimo skyrius
Ikiteisminio tyrimo skyrius
Ikiteisminio tyrimo skyrius
Ikiteisminio tyrimo skyrius
Ikiteisminio tyrimo skyrius
Žvalgybos skyrius
Žvalgybos skyrius
Žvalgybos skyrius
Žvalgybos skyrius
Žvalgybos skyrius
Korupcijos prevencijos poskyris
Korupcijos prevencijos poskyris
Korupcijos prevencijos poskyris
Korupcijos prevencijos poskyris
Personalo skyrius
Teisės skyrius
Informac. technolog. sk.
Tarptaut. bendradarb. sk.
Bendrasis skyrius
Sistemų analizės skyrius
Programų monitoringo sk.
Teisės aktų antikorupciniovertinimo sk.
DIREKTORIAUSPAVADUOTOJAS
(Turto paieška, politinių partijųfinansavimo kontrolė)
Turto paieškos skyrius
Politinių partijų finansavimokontrolės skyrius
Operatyvinės veiklos skyrius
Operatyvinės veiklos skyrius
Operatyvinės veiklos skyrius
Operatyvinės veiklos skyrius
Operatyvinės veiklos skyrius
CHALLENGES
CHALLENGES
Political willStrategyLegal frameworkStructurePersonnelResourcesPublic supportUnrealistic goals and expectations
DILEMMAS
DILEMMAS
Perception or reality?
Public or shadow administration?
Bad or good?
Tactical stability or strategic instability?
Actual level of corruption
Time
Action
Suspension
Perception
The level of corruption posing no danger to the state
Perception or reality?
Public or Shadow Administration?
Bribes: help solve problems I gave them and will continue to give great effectiveness future generation
Effective system of shadow administration: uses public resources unbound by legislation rapid service-orientated (helping a person)
Competition: the most effective wins
Good or Evil?
• mentality of transitional period
• statistical citizen
• distorted system of values
• alienation of the state and citizen
Tactical Stability or Strategic Instability?
REALITY + “CATALYSTS” = PERCEPTION
REALITY: HUGE CORRUPTION INEFFECTIVE ADMINISTRATION
“CATALISTS”: MENTALITY MASS MEDIA
OUTCOME: BAD STATE = CORRUPT STATE DISTRUST OF THE MAIN STATE INSTITUTIONS HIGH CORRUPTION PERCEPTION INDEX
Tactical Stability or Strategic Instability?
CONSEQUENCES:
ACTION INFLUENCES BY PERCEPTION
SYSTEM IS UNSTABLE
SMALL FINANCIAL OR CONCEPTUAL INJECTION INTO ELECTIONS MAY FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE
DEPLOYMENT OF POLITICAL FORCES
INCREASING THE RISK OF STATE CAPTURE
PRIORITIES
PRIORITIES
Political corruption
Administrative corruption
Increasing liability
Education
Courts
EU Anti-Corruption Network
POLITICAL CORRUPTION
Political party funding: ideas or money?
Legally-based influence: lobbying or influence?
Codes of conduct for politicians: conduct or ethics?
ADMINISTRATIVE CORRUPTION
Transparent and effective procedures: collision: citizen vs state inventory of procedures audit
Anti-corruption review of legislationOne-stop-shop principle: minimum information minimum time period minimum price clear and strict consequences
INCREASING LIABILITY
Criminal liability
Civil liability
Administrative liability
Codes of conduct
Moral values
CRIMINAL LIABILITY
Necessary but insufficient tool
Specific corruption investigation tools: effective intelligence whistleblower/informant criminal conduct simulation model technical means databases
CIVIL LIABILITY
Assets recovery system: criminal liability: confiscation civil liability: recovery tax liability: taxes
Living within one’s means
Target: property or a person?
Burden of Proof: citizen or a state?
EDUCATION
Corruption is a threat
Civic society
COURTS
A problem of transitional period
Damaged courts: toothless law enforcement
Courts or investigators?
EU EFFORTS
Two processes: two networks anti-corruption assets recovery
Effective tools: to curb global corruption to strengthen national bodies to reduce dependency on local authorities
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
top related