effective consolidation of oracle databases on … consolidation of oracle databases on linux on ibm...
Post on 28-Apr-2018
257 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Effective Consolidation of Oracle Databases on Linux on IBM System z
Steffen ThossSystem z Virtualization and Linux
PDT lead, IBM
stethoss@cn.ibm.com
2
Discussion Topics
• The IBM & Oracle relationship
• System z virtualization
• Business case for Oracle consolidation
• High-availability and Disaster Recovery
• Deploy to the best fit technology
3
Linux on IBM System z in 3Q2013Installed Linux MIPS at 49% CAGR*
• 25.8% of Total installed MIPS run Linux as of 3Q13
• Installed IFL MIPS increased 44% from 3Q12 to 3Q13
• 38% of System z Customers have IFL’s installed as of 3Q13
• 81 of the top 100 System z Customers are running Linux on the mainframe as of 3Q13 **
• 58% of new FIE/FIC System z Accounts run Linux (FY10-2Q13)
Installed Capacity Over Time
* Based on YE 2003 to 3Q2013**Top 100 is based on total installed MIPS
The IBM and Oracle Relationship
5
The IBM & Oracle Relationship
6
IBM and Oracle Business Relationship
• Oracle Software Stack is certified and supported on certified distributions of Linux running natively in LPARs or as a guest operating system in z/VM virtual machines deployed on the System z platform. (My Oracle Support reference Doc ID: 417770.1).
• Products certified for the System z platform qualify for the same level of support as any other certified Oracle platform.
• There is a dedicated Oracle team @ Oracle specially trained to support customers running Oracle with Linux on System z servers.
• Oracle support policy for security patches for Linux on System z servers:
‒ Security patches also known as “CPU patches” are now included in the quarterly PSU (Patch Set Updates) for all platforms.
• Products ported to Linux on System z servers will be supported according to the Oracle Lifetime Support Policy.
7
IBM and Oracle Business Relationship (cont'd)• IBM and Oracle Business Relationship:
‒ The IBM and Oracle Web site hosted by IBM at: http://www.ibm.com/solutions/oracle
‒ The IBM Partner Relationship Web site hosted by Oracle at: http://solutions.oracle.com/partners/ibm
‒ Frequently asked questions from IBM and Oracle customers about Linux on IBM System z http://www.ibm.com/support/techdocs
8
Oracle DB Certifications on Linux on System z• Oracle has been delivering database solutions on Linux on System z Servers since 2002• On March 30th, 2011 delivered Oracle 11g Release 2 (11.2.0.2) Database for Linux on IBM
System z Servers.• New features such as Real Application Testing and support for huge pages, make this an
interesting Linux on System z option.
• E-Business Suite on Oracle Database 11g Release 2 is supported as a mixed mode architecture (formerly " split tier architecture"). Database can run on Linux on z. EBS code runs on a different platform ( AIX, Linux on x86, etc.)
• Hyperion Finance EPM is supported on Linux on System z in a split tier architecture.
9
Oracle Applications for System z Servers
IBM Data Server on DB2 z/OS and or Linux* Oracle DB Server on Linux* Note: Multi-Platform “Split Tier” Configuration – Oracle applications accessing Database,, only the Database runs on System z Servers unless otherwise noted
10
Oracle Technology Solutionsfor System z Servers
Oracle DB Server on z/OS Oracle DB Server on Linux
Oracle Fusion Middleware on z/OS Oracle Fusion Middleware on Linux
11
Oracle Industry Applications for System z Servers
* Note: Multi-Platform “Split Tier” Configuration – Oracle applications accessing Database,, only the Database runs on System z Servers unless otherwise noted
IBM Data Server on DB2 z/OS and or Linux* Oracle DB Server on Linux
12
Oracle Cross Industry Applications for System z Servers
* Note: Multi-Platform “Split Tier” Configuration – Oracle applications accessing Database,, only the Database runs on System z Servers unless otherwise noted
IBM Data Server on DB2 z/OS and or Linux* Oracle DB Server on Linux
13
Oracle Analytic Solutions for System z Servers
IBM Data Server on DB2 z/OS and or Linux* Oracle DB Server on Linux* Note: Multi-Platform “Split Tier” Configuration – Only the Database runs on System z Servers unless otherwise noted
14
Oracle and Linux on System z IBM & Oracle working together
Redbooks:
Performance Papers:
• Oracle Database on Linux on System z - Disk I/O Connectivity Study
• Analyzing BI Oracle Workloads
• Oracle Real Application Clusters on Linux on IBM System z: Set up and network performance tuning
System z Virtualization
16
Why System z for Oracle
• High Availability Requirements
• Open Standards and Linux
• Disaster Recovery Requirements
• Customer Data on Mainframe
• Increased Performance Requirements
• Economics of Linux (IFL) Specialty Engines
• TCO versus Total Cost of Acquisition
• ‘Green’ Value from Mainframe
• zEnterprise servers can virtualize everything with up to 100% utilization rates
• zEnterprise is the only Heterogeneous platform in the industry
• System z has the highest security rating or classification for any commercial server
17
System z – Extreme VirtualisationBuild-in and Shared Everything Architecture
System z
• Provisioning of virtual servers in seconds
• High granularity of resource sharing (<1%)
• Upgrade of physical resources without taking the system down
• Scalability of up to 1000’s of virtual servers
• More with less: more virtual servers per core, sharing of physical resources
• Extensive life-cycle management
• HW-supported isolation, highly secure (EAL5 or EAL4+ certified)
Distributed platforms
• Limited virtual server scalability per core
• Scaling requires additional physical servers
• Operational complexity increases with growth of virtual server images
• VMware, Xen, Hyper-V focus on x86, no HW management across multiple platforms
18
IBM Mainframe Virtualization Architecture
Business Case For Oracle Consolidation
20
Linux on System z and Oracle Licensing
• An IFL is a specialty engine or Processor on a System z machine
• Oracle uses the term core for purposes of pricing
• From an Oracle licensing perspective an IFL = one core
• The zEnterprise has 4 or 6 core processors but an IFL represents one core
• The consolidation factor is a huge saving in licensing
Sizing is a very important action for consolidation !
21
When Is An Oracle Consolidation Paying Out?
• Real customer situation
• For an Installation of Oracle (RAC) starting with 2 servers‒ Server with 6 Cores - 2 X 6 = 12 Cores
‒ Oracle Enterprise Licenses
‒ RAC Feature
• Replacement with z114 - much cheaper and effective‒ Workload could be handled with 2 IFLs
• Price saving over 3 years:
‒ Almost one million Euro savings
- starting with 2 Server (RAC) installation
22
Cost Comparison
Su x86:1° Anno: € 814.656,652° Anno: € 146.904,603° Anno: € 146.904,60
Totale Triennale€ 1.108.465,85
Risparmio su System z114
- € 923.721,55
Su System Z114 IFL:1° Anno: € 135.776,102° Anno: € 24.484,103° Anno: € 24.484,10
Totale Triennale€ 184.744,3
Confronto spesa triennale - Oracle Enterprise Edition
23
Why High-End Servers?
IBM High End Server: Up to 100% utilization– Highly virtualized and shared resources– Fewer servers, less power, cooling & admin– Optimized use of SW assets
Mixed Utilization on IBM High End Servers
According to a study by Gartner, data centers that do not use virtualization have an average server CPU utilization rate of only 15%.
Utilization on x86 systems
Peak 3 Servers
Peak 3 Servers
Peak 3 Servers
Peak 3 Servers
Peak 3 Servers
24
IT Optimization with Linux on System z Improved Effectiveness and Efficiency
Ut
Ut
Ut
Ut
Ut
Ut
Ut
Ut
Ut
Ut
Ut
Operational and management reduction
Software acquisition and licensing cost reduction
Maximizing utilization
Network reduction
Collocation of data and applications
Floor-space and energy reduction
Growth inside a server
Improving security
Disaster recovery cost reduction
25
Energy and Floor Space Calculation Example
OEM Server environmentals are derived from IDEAS International.
Annual cost calculation Energy cost calculated with a rate of $0.12 per Kilowatt Floor space cost calculated with a rate of $29 per square foot per month
Prices are in USD. Prices may vary in other countries.Data is based on real client opportunity and on internal standardized costing tools and methodologies.Client results will vary by types of workloads, technology level of consolidated servers, utilization factor, and other implementation requirements. Savings will vary by client.
26
IT Optimization for Lower Cost
Linux on System z enables a total cost of acquisition of less than
$1 per day per virtual server1
System z servers often run consistently at
90%+ utilization1
Consolidate up to 40 distributed coresor more on a single System z core, or hundreds on a single footprint1.
HP Proliant BL460c
zBC12w/ IFLs
zEnterprise BC12 can deliver up to 55%
lower TCO running Oracle on IFLs2
zEnterprise BC12 can deliver up to 55%
lower TCO running Oracle on IFLs2
TCO Example2
zBC12: 36% boost per core further reduces the cost of deployment of new and existing workloads and large scale consolidation3
Software Support
People
DR
Facilities
Hardware Maint.
New Hardware
1 IBM calculations of zEnterprise limits across maximum zBC12 configuration. Results may vary. 3-Year cost for hardware, hardware maintenance, and z/VM.2 Based on preliminary measurements and projections comparing Oracle DB on x86 2 chip 8 core 2.13GHz blades vs. zBC12 and ELS solution edition pricing. Subject to change and results may vary based on numerous factors. 3 Based on preliminary internal measurements and projections and compared to the z114. Results may vary.
27
Oracle Database Consolidation Example
Renewal: ProLiant BL280c G6 Xeon X5672 Quad Core 3.2GHz (1ch/4co)Sizing information based on IBM internal RACEv tool and US prices. Actual results may vary.
ProLiant BL260c G5 Xeon E5430 Quad Core 2.66GHz (1ch/4co)
• 50 physical Linux servers• 10 servers @ 25% utilization• 20 servers @ 15% utilization• 20 servers @ 10% utilization
• Oracle DB Standard Edition
New zEC12 ELS (Enterprise Linux Server) with
• 6 IFLs• z/VM hypervisor• 50 Linux servers• Oracle DB Enterprise
Edition
…plus further savings on system admin, floor space, network, etc.
28
Reducing SW Cost Through ConsolidationExample: Oracle Database
• License and annual Software Update License & Support is based on processor cores
• A “processor core factor” is applied to adjust for different technologies
Software Update Licenses & Support (annually) is typically 22% of Processor License (one time charge)
http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/pricing/technology-price-list-070617.pdf
Oracle Technology Global Price ListSeptember 26, 2012
Software Investment Guide
http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/contracts/processor-core-factor-table-070634.pdf
Vendor and Processor Core Processor Licensing Factor
Intel Xeon Series 56XX, Series 65XX, Series 75XX, Series E7-28XX, Series E7-48XX, Series E7-88XX, Series E5-24XX, Series E5-26XX, Series E5-46XX, Series E5-16XX, Series E3-12XX or earlier Multicore chips
0.5
Intel Itanium Series 93XX (For servers purchased on or after Dec 1st, 2010) 1.0
IBM POWER6 1.0
IBM POWER7 1.0
IBM System z (z10 and earlier) 1.0
All Other Multicore chips 1.0
29
Enterprise Linux Server Entry Configuration (real customer!)
Tangible benefits:
Existing 4 HP Alpha Server ES45 + HP disks4x3 CPU Alpha 21264C9x1 core Oracle license
IBM BladeCenter H2 HS22 w/2 proc. 4-coreIBM Storwize V7000 disks16x0.5 core Oracle license
IBM BladeCenter H2 IBM P7 PS700 4-coreIBM Storage DS50208x1 core Oracle DB license
IBM System z10 ELS1 IFLIBM Storwize V70001 Oracle EE license
1st year 164,234 219,998 242,888 234,040
2nd year 164,234 74,234 74,234 8,248
3rd year 164,234 74,234 74,234 8,248
Total (3 years) € 492,701 € 368,465 € 391,355 € 250,537
Intangiblebenefits:
Improved security – no information leak during data copy between serversImproved availability – no network routers or switchesHighest reliability and centralized systems management
Prices based on actual European market prices (Euro). Local pricing and conditions will vary!
30
Software Cost Calculation Example*Example calculation:
from 9 cores to 1 IFL
Example calculation:
from 84 cores to 17 IFLs
Before:
SW licence Support per year
9 * $40K = $400K9 * $10K = $90K = $490K
84 * $40K = $3660K84 * $10K = $840K = $4200K
After:
SW licence Support per year
1 * $40K = $40K1 * $10K = $10K = $50K
17 * $40K = $680K17 * $10K = $170K = $850K
1. Year $40K savings $10K investment
2. Year $80K savings $670K savings
3. Year $80K savings $670K savings
Total for 3 Years $200K savings $1.330K savings
* IBM does not provide any ISV software prices, the prices in this example do not reflect any real prices.
31
Deploy IBM Software to Utilize Oracle DB on System z
z HW Resources
System z PR/SM
z/VMLinux
WebSphere NDTivoli Proventia Network
Oracle DB
Customer example Rapidly growing DB workload,
rich in Sun servers, running out of space and power!
► Solution: z196, z/VM, Linux, WebSphere Application Server Network Deployment, Tivoli Proventia Network
► Net result: 106 Solaris/Sun cores down to „just 6“ on z196
Consolidated DB environment with reduced operating costs and improved performance metrics
Latency between the Oracle and Solaris environments was greatly reduced
Long running batch jobs that had took 30hours in the Sun environment were running in just 15minutes on the z196
Server footprint was sharply reduced, giving up valuable floor space while saving energy, maintenance and software licensing costs
Build new and replace existing apps utilizing Oracle DB on Linux on z.
High Availability and Disaster Recovery
33
The Causes of Unavailability• CPU• Memory• Disk• Electrical outage• …
• Backup• Upgrade• diagnostic• …
• Flood• Electrical problem• Air-conditioning• ….
z/VM 6.2 LGR z/VM 6.2 LGR improves itimproves it
z/VM 6.2 LGR z/VM 6.2 LGR improves itimproves it
LGR = Live Guest Relocation
System z minimizes System z minimizes the impact of the impact of
hardware failures hardware failures (MTBF >5 years) (MTBF >5 years)
34
Oracle High Availability with System z
Hardware provided HA
System z
z/VM
Linux
Oracle
• Spare CPUs• N+1 power supplies• Chip sparring in memory• Concurrent maintenance • 50 years MTBF (system fail.)
• Mature Hypervisor• Hardware assist• z/VM SSI/LGR
• Linux Clustering
• RAC• Data Guard• Flashback• CRS• Grid Control
Operating system HA
Server provided HA
35
High Availability Step 1Active/Passive is Cold Fail-over Solution
35
Cold Fail-Over Infrastructure
Protect all components
• Third Party Applications• Oracle Applications• Oracle Middleware
• Oracle Database
• Cold Failover with downtime• No extra CPU resources required• Linux-HA for any product
and/or
Oracle Clusterware for Oracle products or RACOne Node
z/VM
hyp
ervi
sor
z/VM
hyp
ervi
sor
If active servers goes down, database and application will be automatically
restarted on standby servers.
z/VM hype rvisor
z/VM hype rvisor
Oracle Database
Oracle Middleware
Oracle Applications
Third PartyApplications
IBM zEnterprise
Linux-HA / Oracle Grid Infrastructure
Oracle Database
Oracle Middleware
Oracle Applications
Third PartyApplications
LPAR 2LPAR 1
36
High Availability Step 2Active/Active Increases Applications / DB AvailabilityActive/active mode with Real Application Cluster for High Availability
Provide High Availability – No downtime on node failure– Rolling Upgrade Patching– Increase Workload treatment by
adding nodes with no downtime
Oracle Real Application Cluster (RAC) is flexible architecture
– Workload balancing across the nodes (partitions) of the servers
– Easy maintenance as 1 node can be stopped without Application disruption
If one server goes down, database will be still available, no disruptions.
z/VM
hyp
ervi
sor
z/VM
hyp
ervi
sor
Oracle DatabaseReal Application Cluster
Oracle MiddlewareCluster Implementation
Oracle ApplicationsCluster Implementation
Test Dev
Oracle Grid Infrastructure
z/VM hype rvisor
z/VM hype rvisor
LPAR 2LPAR 1
37
High Availability Step 3 Combine IBM System z, Active/Active Oracle RAC + DR
DB Instance 1Clusterware
DB Instance 1Clusterware
DB Instance 2Clusterware
DB Instance 2Clusterware
Standby DBProd2
Standby DB Prod1
Production Cluster 1
Production Cluster 2
Production Site
IBM zEnterprise
0
7.5
15
22.5
30
0
7.5
15
0
7.5
15
Oracle RAC ClusterAutomated workload balancing
DR Site Reduce downtime and delay the fail-over process
• Easy maintenance as cluster nodes can be stopped with minimum disruption
But does not include disk storage
• Storage and Network HA need to be included
• Could be more flexible infrastructure for provisioning, maintenance and failover operations
• Free resources are reserved in DR server (capacity on demand) to get the additional workload in case of a node failure/maintenance
Do not host only RAC(s) DB in the server …
38
High Availability / Disaster RecoveryThe Global Picture
Oracle Data GuardRequires a minimum downtime of the DB
• Linux-HA can be combined with storage replication solution.
• CPU and Memory resources for the passive server are not wasted, they are reserved and can be automatically activated with Capacity on Demand
DB Instance 1Clusterware
DB Instance 1Clusterware
DB Instance 2Clusterware
DB Instance 2Clusterware
Standby DBProd2
Standby DB Prod1
Production Cluster 1
Production Cluster 2
Production Site DR Site
Storage services(PPRC/Metro Mirror)
Data Guard
Linux-HA
Another singleDB
DB Test Instance 1
DB Test Instance 1
Test / Dev Cluster
• Test and Development are different workloads profiles than production
• Mix production/DR and test environment to optimize resources
• Define test and development workloads as less priority without impact on activities
• Less hardware resources• Simplified and Flexible IT infrastructure
• Less administration and maintenance
Optimize overall infrastructure with consolidation of other workloads (i.e. Development, Test, …) and Capacity on Demand
39
Deploying RAC for High Availability
RAC – Real Application Cluster
• Active/Passive configuration
‒ One node processes work
‒ The other node waits for the first node to fail
‒ No extra CPU resources !
• Active/Active configuration
‒ All nodes process work
‒ If any node fails the cluster is re-mastered.
• Besides availability, RAC can be used for workload distribution
‒ All work does not have to go through all nodes
• Deploy
‒ In the same LPAR for test/dev applications
‒ Across LPARs for LPAR maintenance or software failures (most common implementation)
‒ Across CECs when taking entire systems down is a “common” occurrence
Deploy to the Best Fit Technology
41
Oracle Database Migration ServicesIBM Migration Factory (MF)
How does it work?
Review your current database environment in a planning session with the MF team. And we:
• tell you how long it will take and how much it would cost• perform automated data collection to establish the
metrics for the databases to be migrated• work with you to establish testing requirements and a
cutover strategy• prepare a detailed project plan• manage and perform the migration of the required
databases according to the plan to help ensure that risk, schedule and cost are correctly managed
• confirm that the migrated databases meet your testing requirements
• support you during cutover into production• provide basic skills transfer for an established number of
your personnel on the migration tasks performed during these services
GET YOUR KEY QUESTIONS ANSWERED
• “Can it be done?”
• “How is it done?”
• “What will it cost?”
• “How long will it take?”
• “What are the risks?”
42
Deploy Oracle Software to the “Best Fit” Technology
Oracle software deployments (incl. consolidations)with Linux on zEnterprise provides an excellent priceperformance.• From an Oracle licensing perspective 1 IFL = 1core• Less operational efforts• High levels of security and availability
Business Connexion – South Africa Sparda Datenverarbeitung eG – Germany
ICT services to the financial sector, government, … and more
Approximately 50 virtual Linux servers; flexible environment for hosted services; high performance for Oracle databases
Enabled competitive pricing for client services
IT provider for approximately 4.2 million customers
Runs a number of very large Oracle databases, where the virtual Linux server requires 30 GB memory and ~350 GB storage
Experienced >99% availability, which proves the Linux reputation
zEnterprise
AIX on POWER7®
Blade Virtualization
Cert. Oracle
Solutions
z HW Resources
System z PR/SM™
z/OSz/VM
IBMDB2®
Apps&
DBs
Linux
Oracle DB &
Fusion Middleware
Linux
POWER®
Blades
43
Client Case Studies Linux on System z with Oracle
44
When Consolidating Oracle Database Servers• Understand your requirements (and cost implications)
‒ High Availability (how much money is at stake if your system is down x minutes/hours?)
‒ Disaster Recovery (what is your RTO by application/database?)
➔ Select architecture choices according to requirements
• Low utilization servers and mix of different peak times are best candidates‒ Selected databases with sustained high CPU utilization may not be good candidates
• Databases with high I/O stress will benefit from System z architecture
• Tune migrated database servers to the virtualized environment‒ Right size servers (memory, number of vCPUs, direct I/O)
‒ System z may behave differently compared to x86
• Monitor your system behavior‒ Typically performance behavior is not static
‒ Test before and after changes are applied
• Consider Capacity on Demand (CoD) for peak load times
Customer Examples – More Details
46
Dundee City Council Delivers Value Through New Technologies
Business need:Like all UK local authorities, Dundee City Council needs to handle increasing demand for IT and eGovernment services, while also reducing costs in line with central government targets. When the lease on its server and storage hardware needed to be renewed, the Council saw an opportunity to enhance its capabilities and increase value for money.
Solution:Dundee worked with IBM to upgrade its mainframe environment with two powerful IBM System z10® servers, and introduced the IBM XIV® Storage System to replace a mixed storage environment. The new infrastructure runs a range of Linux applications and Oracle databases – supporting key systems such as social services 24x7.
"Running Linux on the System z platform is a cost-efficient approach, especially for software like Oracle, which is licensed on a per-processor basis.
We can run 60 virtual machines on just four System z processors – whereas an equivalent x86-based architecture might require several processors for each server! So the savings can be considerable ."
- Tim Simpson, IT Support Manager, Dundee City
Council
Benefits:• Improves performance by more than 50 percent, providing capacity for growth without
increasing IT costs. • Enables very rapid provisioning of virtualised server and storage resources, enabling the
IT team to respond more quickly to end users’ needs. • Provides excellent availability and disaster recovery capabilities: in the event of a
disaster at the main site, all systems can be restored at another location within 20 minutes.
• Reduces Oracle licensing costs, as numerous virtual Linux servers can run on each IFL processor.
Creating a cost-effective IT architecture with SUSE Linux Enterprise Server on IBM System z and IBM XIV Storage System technologies
47
Sparda Datenverarbeitung eG chooses IBM zEnterprise with SLES for System z
Watch and listen to• Bernd Bohne, Sparda-Datenverarbeitung e.G., Manager, Central Systems• Marie Wieck, IBM, General Manager, Application Integration Middleware• Steve Mills, IBM, Senior Vice President & Group Executive, Software & Systems
“Over the years, the mainframe transformed from traditional workloads, quite simple, to a universal platform for new workloads as well. And we see a lot of new applications that are coming to this platform.
Especially for Linux, it's perfect.The zEnterprise platform is perfect for consolidating Linux workloads because of the high I/O bandwidth, business continuity with capacity backup features.”
“Oracle has been consolidated on this platform we are using right now only Oracle on the z196 platform,”
Bernd Bohne, Sparda-Datenverarbeitung e.G., Manager, Central Systems
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7Z19IB5AmE
48
Sparda Datenverarbeitung eGSDV runs a number of very large databases within the virtualized Linux environments … The company also relies on SUSE Linux Enterprise Server to support online banking services for the Sparda Banking Group's 4.2 million customers.
Working with IBM, SDV deployed an IBM z196 at each of its two data centers, activating six Integrated Facility for Linux (IFL) engines on each box.
“Our online banking services process approximately 1,200 online transactions per second, so we simply cannot afford them to fail. SUSE Linux Enterprise Server, which is involved in a significant part of this workload, makes us confident that this will not happen.
Since deploying SUSE Linux Enterprise Server on the IBM z196 we have experienced over 99 percent availability.
This proves that Linux's reputation for stability and reliability is well and truly deserved.
We imagine the solution will play an integral role in SDV's infrastructure for some time to come.”
- Bernd Bohne, Department Head, Central Systems Technology, Sparda-Datenverarbeitung eG
49
Business ConnexionThe company was running BMC Remedy IT Service Management Suite on Solaris, and determined that the cost of licensing the underlying Oracle database across numerous processors would make it difficult to offer solutions to clients at a competitive price.
Business Connexion deployed SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for System z* to run a new monitoring solution for clients. The ability to run multiple virtual servers side-by-side on a single mainframe processor ensures low software costs for the solution, enabling Business Connexion to offer a powerful solution at a highly competitive price.
Business Connexion currently has approximately 50 virtual machines across the two mainframes—a mixture of database servers, application servers and proxy servers for several different hosted clients.
Results:
– Created a flexible environment for hosted services– Delivered high performance for Oracle databases– Enabled competitive pricing for client services
“With SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for System z, we get excellent performance and bullet-proof reliability—plus it’s easy and cost-effective to manage.”
- Frans Labuschagne, Senior Manager for Open Systems Support Services, Business Connexion
50
Idaho Power Company Moved to SUSE Linux Enterprise Server on IBM System z to Improve Performance and Reduce Costs
“The power and performance of our SUSE Linux Enterprise environment would have required 3-4 times the amount of money to replicate in other computing environments.”
— Ron Keogh, IT Project Manager for Idaho Power
Company
Working with SUSE Consulting, the Idaho Power IT staff consolidated 30 servers to its mainframe environment using a hosting z/VM operating system for a substantial reduction in server costs.
This consolidation has also significantly reduced the company's Oracle licensing costs.
The IT staff can add a virtual Linux server in a matter of hours. Such consolidation has dramatically reduced both hardware and software licensing costs, providing an immediate return on investment.
Idaho Power now has a stable and reliable infrastructure that gives users access to resources four times faster than before. The company has also increased system performance to respond more quickly to customer issues and power outages.
51
Canada Dept. of National DefenceFrom mainframe serving to hybrid enterprise hosting
Business challenge: Here was the challenge presented to John Palmer by his director, Winston Sorfleet: “I want you to find new ways to use and grow the [new mainframe] technology.” In a large organization with a variety of platfoms, competing IT agendas, and a history of diffuse control, this is easier said than done.
Solution:The Canada Department of National Defence (DND) path to enterprise hosting with the z196 began with consolidation within the mainframe group itself. Palmer brought all three existing mainframes under centralized organizational management. This entailed the consolidation of all mainframe-related tasks, including:Hardware / Software / Storage supportContracting for Software / Hardware / MaintenanceBusiness Recovery contract managementRole of BR Manager transferred as wellTransfer of all mainframe-related funding
At DND Palmer certainly encountered resistance. He overcame the resistance by setting up a proof of concept (POC) around Oracle running with SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for System z. Based on the results of the POC, Palmer could build a compelling business case emphasizing the dramatic licensing cost savings. With the strong support of management, the mainframe group prevailed.
Benefits:You continue to manage/administer your applications as before—the mainframe is only managing the virtualized
hosting platform they are running on.Your AIX®, Linux, Power, and x-based skills continue to be valuable—those operating systems and platforms
remain viable and active in the enterprise as do the applications running on them. Thus, your skills continue to be in demand.
You get rid of platform headaches—the System z team will manage the platforms while you get to do the rewarding work with the applications and users without platform worries.
52
State of Oklahoma Dept. of Human ServicesMaking a Difference for the Business and Consolidating Servers
“We were so close to the end of our lifecycle on HP-UX, and the hardware was getting very expensive to support,” says Sunni Majors, director of Enterprise Technical Services.
“By moving Oracle to the Linux System z platform, we were able to restructure costs for CPUs and move away from licensing by user. This gave us a better return on our investment, since we experienced significant savings in our hardware and software licensing costs by consolidating resources onto a single platform.”
OKDHS IT also was pleasantly surprised at the ease of the server and application migration to Linux on System z, although it remains vigilant when it comes to asset management and TCO throughout its IT architecture.
www.mainframezone.com/interviews/state-of-oklahoma-department-of-human-services-making-a-difference-for-the-
53
The Government of Québec Saves Money and Resources by Consolidating on an IBM System z
“Disaster recovery is better, our environment is very robust and the performance, security and resource sharing with our Oracle databases is very good - and certainly much better than we had had before.”
— Karen-Ann Plourde,project manager with Direction Générale des Technologies de
l'Information et des Communications (DGTIC)
"Oracle billing is based on how many processors it's running on, and with the new needs, we were requiring between 40 or 50 licenses," notes Karen-Ann Plourde. Realizing that there was the potential for massive cost savings, the organization began searching for a solution that would help it consolidate its many Oracle database instances on fewer processors. As part of this process, it looked at such platforms as UNIX, Intel and virtualization on midrange Linux boxes. None of them, however, gave it the savings it was seeking.There's consolidation and then there's consolidation. What's the difference? Well, how about putting 200 Oracle databases as opposed to, say, one or two or even six databases onto one server.
It's no longer a matter of one or two or three LPARs on a machine, but such innovative combinations of technology as Linux married to the z/VM platform. There appears to be no limit as to how much one can consolidate on a single virtualized machine.
www.ibmsystemsmag.com/mainframe/casestudies/miscellaneous/no_limits
Thank you.
54
Consolidate. Reduce Complexity.Save on costs and efforts.
Learn more:CAS1457 SICOOB, the second largest Linux on z implementation in the worldCAS1509 Building a Business Case for System z LinuxTT1395 How to Build an HA environment with Linux on IBM System zFUT1314 SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for System z - Roadmap
Corporate HeadquartersMaxfeldstrasse 590409 NurembergGermany
+49 911 740 53 0 (Worldwide)www.suse.com
Join us on:www.opensuse.org
55
Unpublished Work of SUSE. All Rights Reserved.This work is an unpublished work and contains confidential, proprietary and trade secret information of SUSE. Access to this work is restricted to SUSE employees who have a need to know to perform tasks within the scope of their assignments. No part of this work may be practiced, performed, copied, distributed, revised, modified, translated, abridged, condensed, expanded, collected, or adapted without the prior written consent of SUSE. Any use or exploitation of this work without authorization could subject the perpetrator to criminal and civil liability.
General DisclaimerThis document is not to be construed as a promise by any participating company to develop, deliver, or market a product. It is not a commitment to deliver any material, code, or functionality, and should not be relied upon in making purchasing decisions. SUSE makes no representations or warranties with respect to the contents of this document, and specifically disclaims any express or implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose. The development, release, and timing of features or functionality described for SUSE products remains at the sole discretion of SUSE. Further, SUSE reserves the right to revise this document and to make changes to its content, at any time, without obligation to notify any person or entity of such revisions or changes. All SUSE marks referenced in this presentation are trademarks or registered trademarks of Novell, Inc. in the United States and other countries. All third-party trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
top related