distraction osteogenesis in clp
Post on 17-Jan-2017
54 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS AND
ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY FOR A PATIENT WITH UNILATERAL CLEFT
LIP AND PALATE
DR.SABA BASITMCPS RESIDENTORTHODONTICS
AFID
Case ReportBy: Ji Hyun Kim and CoworkersFrom: AJO-DO March 2015
05/01/2023 3
DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS
Medscape
“A process in which increased amount of both bone and soft
tissue are created as a result of the gradual
displacement of surgically created bony fractures.”
“A process used in orthopedic surgery and oral and maxillofacial
surgery to repair skeletal deformities
and in reconstructive surgery.”Also called
‘callus distraction’ ‘callotasis’
‘Osteodistraction’
DO
05/01/2023 seattlechildrens.org 4
“Distraction osteogenesis is a way to make a longer bone out of a
shorter one.”
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 5
DIAGNOSIS AND ETIOLOGY
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 7
DEMOGRAPHIC DETAILS 22yrs old female Korean woman
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 8
PRESENTING COMPLAINS
Depressed upper lip Protruded lower jaw Midline deviation
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 9
History
Born with a complete unilateral CLP Received a cheilorrhaphy and a palatorrhaphy
when she was 10 years old No history of orofacial congenital anomalies or
deformities in her family No other relevant medical history
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 10
Extraoral Features Midface deficiency Increased mandibular body length Lower facial height comparatively longer than midfacial
height The length of the mental region was much greater than that of the upper lip
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 11
PRETREATMENT PHOTOGRAPHS
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 12
Intraoral Features Angle class III molar Anterior crossbite Maxillary jaw deviated to the right Missing maxillary second premolars Palatally ectopic maxillary right first premolar Maxillary dental midline deviated by 3mm Peg laterals
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 13
Cast..
Reverse overjet
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 14
Panoramic Radiographs
Original cleft defect in the maxillary left lateral incisor area
Potentially impacted 3rd molars Multiple restorations
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 15
Cephalometric Analysis
Skeletal class III relationship with a retrognathic maxilla.
Hyperdivergent skeletal pattern. Retrusive upper lip shows high value of z-angle Bimax retroclinations
17
Treatment objectives
The midface anteroposterior deficiency
The maxillary Jaw deviation to the right
The skeletal class III relationshipand improve the facial profile
The class III molar relationship and the anterior crossbite
March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3
TO
CO
RR
ECT
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 18
Treatment Options:1. Orthodontic and Surgical treatment (Maxillary advancement with posterior impaction and mandibular setback)
2. Orthodontic with Distraction Osteogenesis and Orthognathic Surgery.
(The maxillary advancement with DO followed by orthognathic surgery to posteriorly impact the maxilla and set back the mandible.)
Considering the severity of the skeletal discrepancy,the second option was chosen as a potentially more
stabletreatment method. The RED device was planned to
be used to accomplish the maxillary DO.
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 19
Why Distraction Osteogenesis?
Disadvantages of Orthognathic Surgery in severe maxillary deficiency
•Relapse rates of 25% to 40%•Instability•Limited amount of advancement•Highly invasive surgical technique
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 20
TREATMENT PROCEDURE
Distraction Osteogenesis
Predistractio
n phase
Distraction and
consolidatio
n phase
Post distraction phase
Preoperative Orthodontics Orthognathic Surgery
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 21
PREDISTRACTION PHASE
Intraoral appliance fabricated Orthodontic bands Vertical wires with hooks soldered perpendicular to the labial
wire Two additional short vertical wires with hooks were also
soldered to the labial wire at the position of the canines.
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 23
DISTRACTION AND CONSOLIDATION PHASE
Complete maxillary osteotomy A RED system with 3 screws on each side of cranium. The extraoral hooks were tied to the vertical pin of the RED device. Latency period of 8 days Distraction at the rate of 0.5 mm twice per day for 10 days Intraoral device maintained till 8 weeks
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 24
POST DISTRACTION PHASE
The extra-oral portion was cut Facemask for an additional 2 months to minimize
relapse Force approximately 340 g (12 oz) with 2 heavy elastics
5/16 inc per side.
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 25
AFTER DO Preadjusted fixed appliances Preoperative orthodontics #14 was extracted. Aligning and leveling Decompensation
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 27
ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY Lefort I Osteotomy
1. 5 mm of advancement,2. 3 mm of posterior impaction,3. Horizontal rotation for midline correction
Mandible set back 6mm bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy
Genioplasty
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 28
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 29
RETENTION AND STABILITY Appliances were removed Lingual fixed retainers Mandibular right second molar was splinted
with adjacent tooth Removable wraparound retainers
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 31
TREATMENT RESULTS
The total maxillary advancement with DO was 10 mm
Since 2-jaw surgery with mandibular setback was planned from the beginning, no further maxillary advancement through DO was performed.
Total 7 mm of maxillary advancement
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 34
Post treatment extra- oral photographs
The posttreatment extraoral photographs showed a balanced profile.
The intraoral photographs demonstrated good alignment with acceptable overjet and overbite.
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 36
Midline discrepancy was corrected. The molar relationship on the right side, class III. The molar relationship on the left side, class I.
The final cephalometric analysis: Improved profile Reduced mandibular body length Long mental region reduced Maxillary incisors remained retroclined Improved madibular incisor incliniation
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 38
Total treatment time 36 months 2-year posttreatment photographs
and the cephalometric analysis showed good stability.
Pt. was satisfied
DISCUSSION
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 40
Patient’s strong concern1. Midline coincidence2. Improvement of lateral facial profile
She decided to have: 2-jaw surgery Of 10 mm, the true amount of distraction achieved was 7 mm. The 10-mm distraction with the RED device used in this patient was insufficient.
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 41
Problems That Made The 2-jaw Surgery Inevitable Severe retrusion of the maxilla Dental midline deviation of 3 mm Lack of maxillary incisal exposure and upper lip
support Depression of the nasolabial folds
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 42
RED
RED appliance allows 3-plane guidance. Considering the occlusal plane angle and the
maxillary incisal exposure ,it is intended to induce the force vector of the DO to be forward and downward by adjusting the length of the vertical hook.
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 43
RED The distraction vector can be controlled by both
the external device and the intraoral device of the RED system
In this patient, the amount of advancementneeded was more than 10 mm; therefore, orthognathic
surgery alone was considered insufficient and unstable.
10mm
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 45
Retention after DO:
Suggested retention period for DO 6 to 8 weeks. Red device 8 weeks of consolidation and 8
weeks of retention with the facemask to prevent relapse as much as possible.
The 2.4 mm of relapse occurred during the preoperative orthodontic treatment
1. There was no supplementary appliance for retention
2. Soft tissue factors and muscle stretch
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 46
Other Considerations
Patient had secondary caries on all 4 maxillary molars.
To strengthen the anchorage, banding of all 4 molars was planned.
For a patient with multiple missing teeth or not enough bone in the cranial vault, mini implants or plates could be considered for the skeletal anchorage.
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 47
Literature review (RELAPSE)
Louis et al says that relapse rate of OGS increases as the amount of maxillary advancement increase.
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 48
Literature Review: According to some studies, the maximum maxillary advancement
achieved by conventional OGS techniques varies, ranging from 5mm - 10mm,depending upon scar contracture.
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 49
LITERATURE REVIEW (Relapse)
In our patient, 2.4 mm of relapse, which is about 34% of the total amount of advancement, occurred during the preoperative orthodontic treatment
According to Hochban et al, Cheung et al, Erbe et al reported that relapse rate after maxillary advancement of 7.8mm,3.3mm and 4.6mm was 25%,27% and 40% respectively.
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 50
Recommendation
Overcorrection during DO is suggested
Cho and Kyung et al. recommended overcorrection is of 20% to 30% to minimize relapse.
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 51
Conclusion
DO is an efficient treatment modality in severe cleft-related maxillary hypoplasia.
It promotes correction of bone and soft tissues simultaneously.
Reduces the amount of maxillary movement during the surgery.
05/01/2023 52
Critical Appraisal TITLE Distraction osteogenesis and orthographic surgery
for a patient with unilateral cleft lip and palate
STUDY DESIGN Case report STATISTICS USED Not Applicable DATA ANALYSIS Not Applicable LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 5 CONCLUSION DO is an efficient treatment modality in
cleft-related maxillary hypoplasia. LIMITATIONS Single case
RCT’s are not thereExperimental study
INFERENCE Such type of studies are already being conducted in our setup, they need to be continued.
05/01/2023 March 2015,Vol 147,Issue 3 56
top related