development of a detector testing facility

Development of a Detector Testing Facility

P. M. WhaleyKansas State University

Overview

• Introduction & Motivation

• Design Considerations

• Generation I Diffraction System

• Generation II Diffraction System

• System Testing

• Conclusions

K-STATE REACTOR

• 1960: Construction Permit

100 kW Facility Operating License

• 1962: Initial criticality

• 1968: 250 kW (with pulsing) license

Reactor Experiment Facilities

• 2 Thermal columns • Reflector well • In-core tubes • Beam ports

NWBP (radial)

SWBP (radial)

NEBP (piercing)

SEBP (tangential)

NEBP difficult SEBP heavily used SWBP lightly used NWBP dormant

Beam Port Access

Inner Plug

Outer Plug

door seal

K-State Reactor

• 2000: Recovery of operating time

• 2002: Renewal request (to 1.25 MW)

• 2002: SMART Labs installed at K-State

K-State SMART Laboratories

• Design & production of radiation detectors – Semiconductor-based radiation detectors – Gas-filled radiation detectors

• Major research emphasis on neutron detectors– Opportunities for reactor utilization– Committed NWBP to diffracted beam test facility

• Low gamma contamination• Monoenergetic neutrons

• Set of facilities for specific processes/functions

Crystal Growth & Testing Labs

CdZnTe Growth

Condensation/Deposition Lab

HgI2 (B)

Material Testing

Surface & Volume Characterization

HgI2 (A)

Processing Labs

Class 1000 Clean RoomProcessing

Surface Examination

Crystal Growth

Vacuum/vapor deposition

Ion Mills & Plasma Etching

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

• Floor loading constraints

• Shielding manipulation

• Motion controls

• Beam intensity

• Collimator

Floor Loading Constraints

• Beam centerline 30 in. from floor

• Bay floor rated to110 lb ft-2 (UBC) – Concrete density nominally 150 psf– Untenable limit for shielding mass

• KSU Architect certified design 350 lbf ft-2

– Based on soil compaction– Very limiting, but workable

• Elevated shielding minimizes weight

Shielding Manipulation

• Manageable with facility equipment– Overhead crane– Manual pallet jack– Powered pallet jack

• Elevated– Positioned to shield beam – Reduced floor loading – Stability possible issue

Motion Controls

• Limited resources

• Computer interface, 2-axis controls– Rotation– Elevation

• Adjustable crystal orientation

• Experiments show floor extremely stable to impulse loading

Beam Intensity Implications

• MB distribution – Peak energy about 50 meV– Harmonics not an issue– approximately 1% flux available

• NWBP thermal flux 6x107 n cm-2 s-1

• Estimate 105 n cm-2 s-1 near peak energy available at monochromator

Collimator Design

• Beam & monochromator size– Shielding requirements compete with intensity– Radial beam port gamma is severe

• Limit consequences of beam port leakage

• Options to:– Evacuate flight tube (10% m-1 loss in air)– Install high energy neutron & gamma filters– Install instrumented equipment core-side

GENERATION I SYSTEM

• Motion controls/Monochromator

• Collimator

• Shielding

Generation I Motion Controls

• Newport 2-axis controller– Rotation stage– Goiniometer stage

• Stages mounted on vibration damper

• Labview controls– Scan rotation– Change angle of elevation

Generation I Monochromator

• Silicon monchromator cut from thcik, “perfect” crystal

Generation I Shielding

• Rotating shield/integral shutter • Apertures for 2 angles & main beam • Elevated platform to minimize mass• Wire enclosure

Generation I Shield Details

Generation I Collimator

• 1 ½ inch tubes (3) for flight tube variations

• Penetrations for inst., gas or cooling lines

• Active seal on beam port flange

• Thin Al plates seal flight tube in a flange

• Connectors for vacuum or helium (1 tube)

Generation I Conclusion

• Min. footprint & weight, adequate shielding

• Low intensity

• Clear peak

Problems

• Resources with appropriate knowledge– Personnel – Limited experience

• Diffracted beam intensity– Perfect crystal: high resolution, low intensity– Mosaic permits range of energies– Inducing mosaic spread in Si is not trivial

• Shielding aesthetics

GENERATION II SYSTEM

• Research Assistant

• Large collimator

• Motion controls & monohromators– Cannibalized Huber theta-2theta stack– LabView Virtual Instrument motion control

• Shielding

Graduate Available Soon

• Licensed reactor operator• LabView programming• MCNP modeling• 3-D CADD (fabrication & CNC drawings)• Mechanical aptitude & abilities

– Maintenance & repairs laboratory equipment– Millwright & pipefitting

• ABC News feature“Can I get your picture? My roommate will never believe

that a couple of cute girls visited the reactor.”

Gen II Monochromator Stand

Monochromator Stage

Stage to locate beam

Scan at Test Stand

Gen II Monochromators

• Pyrolitic graphite

• Silicon

• Crystal bender

Gen II Collimator Design

Generation II Collimator

Gen II Collimator Mounted

Thin Al window

Vacuum connection

Equipment from SANS

Filter Tests

Sapphire

Bismuth

Concrete Block Manufacture & Use

Customized Building Blocks

“Industrial” Concrete Blocks

Gen II Shutter

Shielding Assembly

Completed Stack

Access Controls

System Testing

• Measurements of spectrum

• Monochromator tests for intensity

• Filter test for operational characteristics

Measured Spectrum (PG)

1 KW Spectrum

100

1000

10000

0.001 0.01 0.1 1

Energy (eV)

Co

un

ts

Monochromator Tests

• Silicon

• Bent Silicon

• Pyrolitic graphite

Detector Test Stand

Detector Testing

BN Detector Test

Conclusions

• Facility is essentially complete– Remount area monitor– Finish enclosure

• Experiment status

sensor

• Testing programs

in progress

Lessons Learned

• Bias of experience affected perceptions– Spectral measurement as a lab exercise

• Using a system versus• Building a system

– Copper monochromator

– Beam extracted from D2O tank adj. to core

• Filtering (bismuth & sapphire) perceptions– Not needed– Degrades intensity unacceptably

Lessons Learned

• Crystal orientation perception:– Need to have the crystal fully indexed– Flats in Si wafer indicate principle plane

• Mosaic spread was not considered necessary

Lessons Learned

• Design objectives need to:– Reflect actual needs– Be specified and fixed

• Concrete terminology– Concrete is rated for structural load– Architectural load is different

• Focus on beam, disregarding background

Lessons Learned

• Bigger is not always better (collimator)– Shielding & background exacerbated– No gain in intensity

• Aesthetics

Lessons Learned

• Only single stage required for test beam– The circle is only use to find the beam– Shielding prevents using the circle

• Stepped shielding– Concrete manufacturers are flexible– Customization is easy

• Bismuth, like water, more dense as liquid

Reference Spectra

• GA Report (KENO code)

• LiF Spectrometer

GA Report 4361

KSU TRIGA Full Power Neutron Flux at 23C

1.0E+04

1.0E+11

2.0E+11

3.0E+11

4.0E+11

5.0E+11

6.0E+11

7.0E+11

8.0E+11

0.01 0.1 1 10

Energy (eV)

Neu

tro

ns/

cm^2

F Ring

LiF Spectrometer Testing

BACK

Monochromator Intensity

• Silicon

• Bent silicon

• Pyrolitic graphite

• Spectrum measurements– Si– PG

Silicon Intensity

<111> Si 30 degree detector angle, 1 kw

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

5 10 15 20 25

Position

Co

un

ts p

er 3

sec

on

ds

bent 1 polished

unbent polished

Bent Silicon Intensity

<111> Si 30 degree detector angle, 1 kW

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

5 10 15 20 25

Position

Co

un

ts p

er 3

sec

on

ds

bent 2 polished

bent 2 unpolished

Pryolitic Graphite Intensity

Crystal alignment, 1 kw, 30 degree detector angle

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Position

cts

Si Spectrum SEBP by Angle

<111> Si bent Tangential beamport spectrum 1 kW

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Crystal Position

Co

un

ts p

er 3

se

co

nd

s

PG Spectrum SEBP by Angle

PG Tangential beamport spectrum 1 kW

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Crystal Position

co

un

ts p

er 3

sec

on

ds

Filter Testing

• Pyrolitic graphite

• Bismuth

Spectrum Bare and PG Filtered

100

1100

2100

3100

4100

5100

6100

7100

8100

9100

0.001 0.011 0.021 0.031 0.041 0.051 0.061 0.071 0.081 0.091

Energy (eV)

Co

un

ts

Sapphire filter CORE III

Bare beam CORE III

PG Spectrum Filtered

78%

Bi Filtered Spectrum

Spectrum Bare and Bismuth Filtered

0.E+00

1.E+04

2.E+04

3.E+04

4.E+04

5.E+04

6.E+04

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Angle

Co

un

t

57%