cypress-fairbanks independent school district board goal ... · cypress-fairbanks independent...
Post on 27-Jul-2020
2 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
August, 2011
Cypress-Fairbanks
Independent
School District
Board Goal-setting
Workshop
August 4, 2011
August, 2011
Purposes of Tonight‟s
Board Goal-setting Workshop
► Establish goals for continuing and improving
the performance of CFISD in meeting
constitutional directives and Board and
community expectations.
August, 2011
Board Goals: Article 7, Section 1
of Texas Constitution
► Support and Maintenance of System of
Public Free Schools A general diffusion of knowledge being essential
to the preservation of the liberties and rights of
the people, it shall be the duty
of the Legislature of the State
to establish and make suitable
provision for the support and
maintenance of an efficient
system of public free schools.
August, 2011
CFISD Enrollment
►Enrollment projection for „11-„12 = 107,683
►Increase of 42,154 students since 2000
►Average increase of 3,000 students each year
for the past 3 years
►More than 1,904 additional
students in 2010-11
►Increase of about 9,500*
students projected
in the next 5 years * corrected 8/5/2011
August, 2011
New Home Closings in CFISD
2159
2589 2654
2144
2482 2706
3251
4047 3979
4948
5666
6249
6536
7510 7533
5669
3866
3039 2815
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Ne
w H
om
e C
los
ing
s
•Information from MetroStudy
August, 2011
Demographic Changes in
Cy-Fair ISD 2000-01 through 2010-11 School Year
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
School Year
Perc
en
t
White
Hispanic
Afr. Am.
Asian
F/R
August, 2011
Board Goals:
Board & Community Expectations
►CFISD will continue to be an organization where students and staff can learn and work in a safe and supporting environment.
►CFISD will develop a strong sense of teamwork between all stakeholders in the community building connections that increase learning opportunities for our students.
August, 2011
Board Goals:
Board & Community Expectations
►CFISD will continue to incrementally improve in all areas of the district producing exemplary academic results while developing the whole student through extracurricular and co-curricular activities.
►CFISD will continue to put the district in a financially
solvent situation by being good stewards of the district
funds.
August, 2011
“The object of education is to
prepare the young to educate
themselves throughout their lives.”
Robert Maynard Hutchins
August, 2011
Goal 1
August, 2011
Format of Tonight‟s Presentation
►Highlights
►Recommendations
August, 2011
►Increase in standards
►Inclusion of additional students
►Addition of new performance measures
►Use of the federally-mandated definition of
race and ethnicity
►Discontinuation of the Texas Projection
Measure
Changes to the
2011 State Accountability System
August, 2011
Hancock Aragon Arnold Bleyl Campbell Cook Hopper Thornton Truitt Watkins
Campuses in CFISD Rated
Academically Acceptable in „11
Cypress Creek Cypress Lakes Cypress Ridge Cypress Springs Jersey Village Langham Creek
Data Source: Accountability Data Tables from TEA
August, 2011
Adam Andre‟ Ault Bane Bang Birkes Black Duryea Emery Emmott Farney Fiest
Metcalf
Owens
Post
Postma
Reed Rennell M. Robinson A. Robison Tipps Walker Willbern
Wilson Yeager Goodson Kahla Labay Smith Spillane Cy-Fair HS Cypress Falls Cypress Ranch Cypress Woods
Campuses in CFISD Rated
Recognized in „11
Francone Frazier Gleason Hemmenway
Holbrook Horne Jowell Kirk Lee Lieder Lowery McFee
Data Source: Accountability Data Tables from TEA
August, 2011
Campuses in CFISD Rated
Exemplary in „11
Copeland
Danish
Hairgrove
Hamilton ES
Holmsley
Keith
Lamkin
Matzke
Millsap
Moore
Sampson
Sheridan
Swenke
Warner
Hamilton MS
Data Source: Accountability Data Tables from TEA
August, 2011
2011 Accountability Ratings
Rating Elementary
Schools
Middle
Schools
High
Schools Total
Exemplary 14 1 -- 15
Recognized 37 5 4 46
Academically Acceptable 1 9 6 16
Academically Unacceptable -- 1 -- 1
Total 52 16 10 78
Data Source: Accountability Data Tables from TEA
August, 2011
2011 TAKS Passing Rates:
Reading/ELA (Grades 3-11)
Data Source: District Accountability Data Tables
Data reflect October subset students only.
Group Percent Passing Percent Commended
2010 2011 Diff. 2010 2011 Diff.
All 93 93 = 38 38 =
AA 90 89 -1 27 27 =
H 90 89 -1 26 28 +2
W 97 97 = 51 51 =
ED 88 88 = 24 25 +1
August, 2011
2010 TAKS Passing Rates:
Math (Grades 3-11)
Data Source: District Accountability Data Tables
Data reflect October subset students only.
Percent Passing Percent Commended
Group 2010 2011 Diff. 2010 2011 Diff.
All 88 88 = 35 35 =
AA 79 79 = 20 18 -2
H 84 84 = 25 26 +1
W 94 94 = 47 47 =
ED 82 82 = 23 23 =
August, 2011
2010 TAKS Passing Rates:
Science (Grades 5, 8, 10, 11)
Data Source: District Accountability Data Tables
Data reflect October subset students only.
Percent Passing Percent Commended
Group 2010 2011 Diff. 2010 2011 Diff.
All 89 88 -1 37 37 =
AA 80 79 -1 21 20 -1
H 83 83 = 26 27 +1
W 96 96 = 51 52 +1
ED 81 80 -1 23 24 +1
August, 2011
2011 TAKS Passing Rates:
Social Studies (Grades 8, 10, 11)
Data Source: District Accountability Data Tables
Data reflect October subset students only.
Percent Passing Percent Commended
Group 2010 2011 Diff. 2010 2011 Diff.
All 97 98 +1 59 60 +1
AA 95 96 +1 42 44 +2
H 96 96 = 46 48 +2
W 99 99 = 74 75 +1
ED 95 96 +1 41 44 +3
August, 2011
2011 TAKS Passing Rates:
Writing (Grades 4 & 7)
Data Source: District Accountability Data Tables
Data reflect October subset students only.
Percent Passing Percent Commended
Group 2010 2011 Diff. 2010 2011 Diff.
All 95 94 -1 34 34 =
AA 94 92 -2 25 24 -1
H 94 93 -1 23 24 +1
W 97 97 = 46 47 +1
ED 93 91 -2 21 21 =
August, 2011
Student Success Initiative:
Overview for “All Students”
Test Grade Administration
Gains
1st vs. 3rd 1st (April)
2nd (May)
3rd
(June)
Reading 5 91 95 97 +6
8 93 96 98 +5
Math 5 93 97 98 +5
8 82 89 92 +10
Data Sources: District reports from NCS Pearson
Data reflect All Students tested on the English TAKS and TAKS-A
August, 2011
English Language Learners
Progress Indicator
100% 100% 100%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Elementary Middle
School
High School
Met 60%Standard
Data Source: District Accountability Data Tables
August, 2011
Commended Performance Indicator:
Met Recognized or Exemplary Standard
91%
97%99% 100%
50
60
70
80
90
100
Math-ED Math-All Reading-ED Reading-All
Data Source: District Accountability Data Tables
August, 2011
Completion Rate I – 96.5%
Data Source: District Accountability Data Tables
95.8% 96.3% 96.5%
50
60
70
80
90
100
Class of 2008 Class of 2009 Class of 2010
6,235
Students 5,863
Students 5,559
Students
August, 2011
Recommended High School
Program
Data Sources: 2008, 2009, and 2010 AEIS Report
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
CLASS
2006
CLASS
2007
CLASS
2008
CLASS
2009
August, 2011
Lone Star College
Cy-Fair Dual Credit Enrollment
2010 2011 Growth
Fall 1,413 2,082 +47%
Spring 1,892 2,061 +9%
Course Enrollment
August, 2011
CFISD Advanced Placement
Data Source: College Board Advanced Placement Reports
4,553
4,640
4400
4450
4500
4550
4600
4650
4700
4750
4800
2009-10 2010-11
Number ofTests Scored 3,4, or 5
August, 2011
Mobility vs. Stability: Reading
92%87%85%
40%
31%28%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1 Year 2 Years 3 or More Years
% P
assin
g T
AK
S
Reading Met Reading Comm.
Data Source: Internally Generated
August, 2011
Mobility vs. Stability: Math
87%79%
74%
37%
26%23%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1 Year 2 Years 3 or More Years
% P
assin
g T
AK
S
Math Met Math Comm.
Data Source: Internally Generated
August, 2011
Highlights for Goal 1:
Academic Achievement
►Differentiated Instruction
►Mega Monitoring
►Curriculum Management System: iXplore
►Rookie Principals Coaching Model
August, 2011
Highlights for Goal 1:
Academic Achievement
►Technology-based instruction
READ 180
Achieve3000
ST Math and ST Math Fluency
Spatial-Temporal Math
PLATO
Istation
Expert 21
Gizmo
August, 2011
Highlights for Goal 1:
Academic Achievement
►Successful programs targeting struggling
learners
Academic camps
Saturday schools
Skills for Academic Success (SAS)
Algebra lab (HS)
Geometry lab (HS)
Math lab (MS)
August, 2011
Highlights for Goal 1:
Academic Achievement
►Special Education
Math Solutions
Review 360
System 44
►New Arrival Centers (NAC)
4 high schools
5 middle schools
4 elementary schools
August, 2011
Highlights for Goal 1:
Academic Achievement
►CFISD “Rigor, Relevance, and Relationships” Leadership and Teacher Conferences
Provided our leaders and teachers with an opportunity to learn from international and national experts in the field of education.
1,200 leaders attended the RRR Leadership Conference and 1,100 teachers attended the RRR Teacher Conference.
►General Leadership Training focus on Differentiated Instruction and Technology
August, 2011
2011-12 and Beyond
August, 2011
►For grades 3-8, tests are in same grades and
subjects as TAKS.
Grades 3 - 8 mathematics
Grades 3 - 8 reading
Grades 4 and 7 writing
Grades 5 and 8 science
Grade 8 social studies
New Assessment Program:
STAAR
August, 2011
►For high school, twelve end-of-course tests
replace ten grade-level tests.
Algebra 1, Geometry, Algebra II
Biology, Chemistry, Physics
English I, English II, English III
World Geography, World History, US History
New Assessment Program:
STAAR
August, 2011
► More rigorous than TAKS; greater emphasis
on alignment to college and career readiness
►“Fewer, deeper, clearer ” focus
► Provide a more clearly articulated
assessment program
New Assessment Program:
STAAR
August, 2011
Performance Labels
PERFORMANCE
Level I:
Unsatisfactory
Academic
Performance
Level II:
Satisfactory
Academic
Performance
Level III:
Advanced
Academic
Performance
New Assessment Program:
STAAR
August, 2011
►Student Success Initiative
Since performance standards will not be
established until October 2012, pass/fail
performance on the assessments will not be
provided.
So there will not be retest opportunities (May and
June administrations) in 2011-2012.
New Assessment Program:
STAAR
August, 2011
2011–2012 2012–2013 2013–2014 2014–2015
GR 9 EOC EOC EOC EOC
GR 10 TAKS EOC EOC EOC
GR 11 TAKS TAKS EOC EOC
GR 12 TAKS TAKS TAKS EOC or
TAKS
Plan for phase-out of TAKS and phase-in of STAAR
New Assessment Program:
STAAR
August, 2011
No ratings from the State Accountability
System in 2011-12
Exemplary, Recognized,
Academically Acceptable,
and Academically Unacceptable
New Assessment Program:
STAAR
August, 2011
Increasing Standards:
Federal Accountability (AYP)
► Percentage of students that must meet
AYP performance standards
Test „08-„09 „9-„10 „10-„11 „11-„12 „12-„13 „13-„14
R/ELA 67 73 80 87 93 100
Math 58 67 75 83 92 100
No SSI 2 or 3
August, 2011
►STAAR Gazing
Build capacity of teachers, principals,
parents, and the community at large
Deliver high-quality professional development for
all levels of the organization and parents
Develop and publish resources and materials for
teachers, principals, parents, and the community
at large
Recommendations for Goal 1:
Academic Achievement
August, 2011
District
Campus
Levels of Access
District Level
Campus Level
Teacher Level
Teacher
Student
Layers of Data
August, 2011
Historical
achievement
data
TAKS Objective
data
Comparison
data by teacher
for a specific
course
Cognos Reporting
August, 2011
87%
Scatterplots
August, 2011
Teacher Profile
# Tested # Pass % Pass
All 37 31 83.8
AA 0 0
H 37 31 83.8
W 0 0
ECD 34 28 82.4
# Tested # Pass % Pass
All 33 26 78.8
AA 3 0 0
H 26 22 84.6
W 3 3 100
ECD 26 20 76.9
School Year: 2011-12
TAKS Success Rate for School Year: 2010-11
TAKS SUBJECT: Mathematics
School Year: 2010-11
TAKS Success Rate for School Year: 2010-11
TAKS SUBJECT: Mathematics
August, 2011
Student Profiles: 300+ Data Points Tracked Over Time
August, 2011
Pyramid of Performance Levels
and Support Services
Pyramid of Performance Levels and Support Services
Support
Level 3
Support
Level 1
Support
Level 2
Campus Names
Campus Names
Campus Names
Outside the
Criteria
District Level
Support Strategies
Criteria
Level 3: 75% or Below
Level 2: 76% - 85%
Level 1: 86% or Above Level 3 (75% or Below)
Expectations:
Strategy Choices: Level 2 (76% - 85%)
Expectations:
Strategy Choices:
Level 1 (86% or Above)
Strategy Choices:
August, 2011
Recommendations for Goal 1:
Academic Achievement
Building Capacity
►AYP coach and additional staff
►CFISD “Rigor, Relevance, and Relationships”
Leadership and Teacher Conferences offered
annually
►Middle school campus content instructional specialist
(CCIS)
►Retired teacher program
►General Leadership Training focus on Differentiated Instruction and Technology
August, 2011
Recommendations for Goal 1:
Academic Achievement
Monitoring
►Extend Mega-monitoring on additional campuses
►Content specific Mega-monitoring
►Data meetings after locally-developed assessments
►Achievement meetings
►Focus on vertical alignment
August, 2011
Recommendations for Goal 1:
Academic Achievement
Closing the Achievement Gap
►Learn from experts regarding educating African
American and economically disadvantaged students
►Book studies and article reviews
►Leadership Academy task force
►Staff development on culturally responsive teaching
to meet the needs of all African American and
economically disadvantaged students
August, 2011
Recommendations for Goal 1:
Academic Achievement
Projects and Programs
►Continue successful programs targeting struggling
learners
Academic Camps
Saturday schools
Personal, Academic, and Career Exploration
(PACE)
Algebra and Geometry Labs
August, 2011
Projects and Programs cont.
►Software supporting instruction targeting students who are behind their peers READ 180
Spatial-Temporal Math
Achieve3000
Istation
PLATO
Gizmo
System 44
Math Solutions
Recommendations for Goal 1:
Academic Achievement
August, 2011
Our journey of life is about progress, not perfection.
It's not about doing one thing 100% better - It's a matter of doing 100 things, 1% better each day. Progress is evolutionary not revolutionary, and most days we measure our progress in inches, not miles. You'll be amazed at how much distance you can cover by taking it in increments.
Adopted and modified from “An excerpt from The Best Way Out is Always Through” by BJ Gallagher
August, 2011
Goal 2
August, 2011
►Recruiting
►Developing
►Retaining
Highlights for Goal 2A:
QUALITY Staff
August, 2011
►Competitive Salaries and Benefits
►Student Teacher Program
►Ready, Set, Teach!
►Applicant Tracking System
Highlights for Goal 2A:
Recruiting QUALITY Staff
August, 2011
► Staff Development for Teachers
► Teacher Leadership Academy
► Leadership Academy
Highlights for Goal 2A:
Developing QUALITY Staff
August, 2011
Highlights for Goal 2A:
Overall Attrition Rate, 2009-10
6.5%9%
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2009-10 All 2009-10 New
OverallAttrition Rate
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
August, 2011
DATE Grant ► Purpose:
Provide financial awards for teachers who improve student
achievement
Support the recruitment and retention of quality teachers
► Participating Campuses:
14 Elementary Campuses
7 Secondary Campuses
Highlights for Goal 2A:
Retention of QUALITY Staff
August, 2011
Highlights for Goal 2A:
Retention of QUALITY Staff
64%
81%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Met Criteria
2008-09
2009-10101
Teams
104
Teams
August, 2011
Highlights for Goal 2A:
Retention of QUALITY Staff
Campus Retention Rate
2009-2010
Campus Retention
2009-2010
Andre‟ 82% Leider 88%
Bane 91% McFee 84%
Duryea 92% Metcalf 87%
Frazier 87% Reed 75%
Hairgrove 85% Sheridan 75%
Hemmenway 78% Tipps 90%
Holbrook 84% Walker 91%
August, 2011
Highlights for Goal 2A:
Retention of QUALITY Staff
Campus Retention Rate
2009-2010
Dean 90%
Campbell 89%
Hopper 89%
Kahla 84%
Thornton 93%
Truitt 89%
Watkins 92%
August, 2011
Highlights for Goal 2B:
Student Services
►Classroom Management Support Services:
193 individual student observations
38 student reviews conducted
387 teacher observations with consultations
4 school “Team Tackles”
21 new-teacher observations
78 district staff development sessions
288 student support plans
August, 2011
Highlights for Goal 2B:
Student Services
►Student Discipline:
Increased number of campuses participating in
Positive Behavior Intervention and Support (PBIS)
Developed process for differentiated discipline
Implemented Project Safety
Implemented School Tipline
August, 2011
Highlights for Goal 2B:
Student Services
►Student Discipline:
Facilitated Safe Schools Committee and
Superintendent‟s Student Leadership Council
Reduced DAEP placements and expulsions
Provided training for campus administrators with
focus on bullying and school climate/culture
August, 2011
Highlights for Goal 2B:
PBIS: Dramatic Results
Cohort 1: Completed 5th year of PBIS
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
Cy-Ridge Cy-Springs Thornton Truitt Duryea Lee
Nu
mb
er
of
incid
en
ts
Pre-PBIS
After 5th year
August, 2011
► Enhanced screening and selection process for teachers and campus administrators
► Expand implementation of the applicant tracking system
► Succession Plan
► HR Toolkit
Recommendations for Goal 2A:
QUALITY Staff
August, 2011
► Research options to provide law enforcement services to the District
► Increase the number of PBIS campuses moving to Level II
► Develop monthly leadership training for secondary administrators
► Continue to refine process for differentiated discipline
Recommendations for Goal 2B:
Student Services
August, 2011
► Reduce the number of out-of-school suspensions and
discretionary DAEP placements and expulsions
► Continue Safe Schools Committee
► Administer campus bullying survey for grades 4-12
► Continue Superintendent‟s Student Leadership Council
► Implement paperless Code of Conduct
Recommendations for Goal 2B:
Student Services
August, 2011
Goal 3
August, 2011
Highlights for 3A and 3B:
Volunteers and Business Partners
►+32 business partners (goal was 20)
►$6,742,848 reported donations
►5 TAG science teams
►4 TAG math teams organized
►6 new “Adopt-A-School” partners (goal was 3)
►+595 Global volunteers (goal was 300) for a total of 827
►+293 new mentors trained
►+22 new Bus Buddies businesses/organizations (goal was 5)
August, 2011
Recommendations for 3A and 3B:
Volunteers and Business Partners
►Increase trained mentors by 200.
►Enhance use of Virtual Volunteer
Create Global Volunteer page
Create email groups
►Increase use of HEP Development Program
by 15%.
►Develop Adopt-a-School Coalition.
►Collaborate with Cy-Hope on projects to
benefit CFISD students and parents.
August, 2011
Highlights for Goal 3C:
Communication
►218.9 million hits to www.cfisd.net
►21,149 files on www.cfisd.net
►12,564 files on inside.cfisd.net
►307 podcasts
►338 press releases
►5,234 Facebook friends
►729 Twitter followers
August, 2011
Highlights for Goal 3C:
Communication, continued
►39 issues of e-Connection
►7.2 million visits to Schoolwires
►85 CFTV Online programs
►15 News Flashes - CFTV
►1,765 “Super Senior” cardholders
August, 2011
Recommendations for Goal 3C:
Communication
►Increase production of News Flashes to give
patrons access to district news in a
streamlined format.
►Highlight the effectiveness and efficiency of
district teams that operate interdependently to
provide district services.
August, 2011
Recommendations for Goal 3C:
Communication
►Increase the number of issues of Inside
Cypress-Fairbanks ISD published annually.
►Support human resources in developing and
posting a virtual HR Toolkit.
August, 2011
Goal 4
August, 2011
Highlights for Goal 4A:
Efficiency and Revenue
►Electronic waste environmentally disposed at no cost to district.
►Reallocated excess furniture to save capital costs.
►Revised Records Retention Manual for all campuses and most district-level departments.
August, 2011
►Generated more than $340,000 on surplus
property sales.
►Developed state-adopted textbook catalog for
secondary campuses.
Highlights for Goal 4A:
Efficiency and Revenue, cont‟d
August, 2011
Highlights for Goal 4A:
Efficiency and Revenue, cont‟d
►Berry Center
13% increase in revenue
Created online marketing site featuring catering
and event production capabilities.
Developed facility advertising/naming rights RFP.
August, 2011
Community Programs
►Established and opened before/after-school
programs. 52 campuses
3,500 students beginning enrollment
3,800 students ending enrollment
►Developed Day Camp programs 22 programs - 630 students
►Developed summer programs 2 all-day summer camps - approximately 680 students
Fun Camps - 830 students
Highlights for Goal 4A:
Efficiency and Revenue, cont‟d
August, 2011
Highlights for Goal 4A:
Efficiency and Revenue, cont‟d
Community Programs ►Designed specialized events
2 Pajama Jam events – 170 students 2 Fast Forward events for 6th graders – 475
students
August, 2011
Highlights for Goal 4B:
Legislative Initiatives
► Intensive networking for advocacy Texas School Alliance
Texas Association of School
Administrators
Texas Association of School Boards
Greater Houston Partnership
►Cy-Fair Houston Chamber of Commerce
►Community Legislative Committee 40 members
13 meetings/Capitol visits
11 community informational meetings
Website for education community
August, 2011
General Administration ►Implement new software program in 2011-12
to standardize facilities use scheduling.
►Revise Records Retention Manual for
remaining departments.
►Implement on-line transcript request system.
►Develop process and procedures for
Instructional Allotment Fund.
Recommendations for Goal 4 A:
Efficiency and Revenue
August, 2011
Recommendations for Goal 4 A:
Efficiency and Revenue
Berry Center ►+12% overall use ►+22% revenue from rentals and advertising
Space and equipment rentals Scoreboard ads Advertising/naming rights for entrances and other
spaces
August, 2011
►Community Programs
►+5% increase in before/after-school
enrollment – 4,000 students
►Increase frequency of special events.
►Develop marketing tools for ROPES courses.
Recommendations for Goal 4 A:
Efficiency and Revenue, cont‟d
August, 2011
Recommendations for Goal 4B:
Legislative Initiatives
►Interim meetings with CFISD legislators
►Continuation of Community Legislative
Committee
►Collaboration during interim with TSA, TASA,
TASB, GHP
August, 2011
Highlights for Goal 4:
Technology Services
►Launched phase I of the Curriculum Management
System – iXplore
►Bid and installed video delivery system for
classrooms
►Planned and trained for update of the student
information system (SIS) and gradebrook
►Developed and received board and TEA approval
for the district technology plan for 2011-2014
August, 2011
Highlights for Goal 4:
Operations and Transportation
►Reduced operations cost by $887,000 per
WCL recommendation
►Completed Region IV review of routing and
transportation services
August, 2011
Recommendations for Goal 4:
Technology Services
►Implement phase II of iXplore
►Implement and support SIS upgrade
►Convert to Microsoft Active Directory
►Evaluate and migrate to web-based email
►Modify and refine disaster management plan
August, 2011
Recommendations for Goal 4:
Operations and Transportation
►Reduce Operations labor cost by $1.1m
►Reduce Operations paper and soap costs by
$130k
►Reduce Transportation labor costs by
approximately $470k
►Pursue and consider alternate fuels grants
August, 2011
Highlights for Goal 4A:
Efficiency and Revenue
►Bond ratings
►ASBO and GFOA awards
►“Superior Achievement” rating
from FIRST
►Adopted a balanced budget in June
►Awarded “Gold” level status for the
Leadership Circle Award by the Texas
Comptroller
August, 2011
Highlights for Goal 4A:
Efficiency and Revenue, cont‟d
►Received $179,000 in rebates from CenterPoint SCORE and TXU Energy Efficiency Programs
►Completed implementation of Facilities Planning and Construction department reorganization
►APQC Energy Reduction Plan developed and approved
►Reduced maintenance overtime costs by $241,910 or 37%
►Implemented revised mowing schedule to reduce contract services by $45,596 or 30%
August, 2011
Highlights for Goal 4C:
Bond Projects
►1 new middle school constructed
Salyards Middle School
►Managed 76 construction projects
►9 Portable buildings relocated
►Re-evaluation of construction timelines
Delayed school opening dates
Accelerated renovation projects
August, 2011
Recommendations for Goal 4:
Efficiency and Revenue
►Balanced budget for 2012-13
►Maintain bond ratings
►Provide a salary increase to employees as part
of the 2012-13 operating budget
►Implement a fully electronic bid management
system
August, 2011
Recommendations for Goal 4:
Efficiency and Revenue, cont‟d
►$100,000 goal for continued participation in
CenterPoint‟s SCORE (Schools Conserving
Resources) Program
► Implementation of approved APQC Energy
Reduction Program for net savings goal of
$110,000 in first year and $650,000/year thereafter
►Purchase and implement new School Dude
maintenance work order software system to
improve efficiencies in department operations
August, 2011
Board Feedback Board Feedback
top related