copyright uct copyright uctgsblibrary.uct.ac.za/researchreports/2010/swart.pdf · providing and...
Post on 13-Oct-2019
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Copyright UCT
THE GLOBAL ECOSPHERE RETREAT CERTIFICATION:
An explorative study on how new adaptive sustainability
management practices influence the strategic planning and
management at Wolwedans, Namibia.
A Research Report
presented to The Graduate School of Business
University of Cape Town
In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the
Masters of Business Administration Degree
by
Carl J Swart
December 2010
Supervisor: Thomas Koeble
Copyright UCT
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 1
Acknowledgements
I am indebted to Stephan, Gerald and the whole Wolwedans team. Thank you all
for taking the time to share your knowledge and thoughts with me, your inputs
have been invaluable to the success of this report. A special thanks to Stephan for
opening the doors in order for me to scrutinize and investigate Wolwedans’s
management practices and for introducing me to the Zeitz foundation’s Long Run
Initiative.
A heartfelt thank you to my research supervisor Thomas Koeble, your advice,
guidance and encouragement instilled confidence and spurred me on.
Furthermore I would not have survived the MBA were it not for the support in
kind from family and friends. Thank you all for standing by me!
Plagiarism Declaration
1. I know that plagiarism is wrong. Plagiarism is to use another’s work and
pretend that it is one’s own.
2. I have used a recognised convention for citation and referencing. Each
significant contribution and quotation from the works of other people has
been attributed, cited and referenced.
3. I certify that this submission is all my own work.
4. I have not allowed and will not allow anyone to copy this essay with the
intention of passing it off as his or her own work.
Signed:
Carl J Swart
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 2
THE GLOBAL ECOSPHERE RETREAT
CERTIFICATION:
An explorative study on how new adaptive sustainability
management practices influence the strategic planning
and management at Wolwedans, Namibia.
Keywords
Sustainable development, certification, ecotourism, adaptive management,
nature reserve, strategic, holistic, conservation, community, Namibia, Southern
Africa
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. PREFACE.......................................................................................................................... 5
II. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 6 A. Background .............................................................................................................. 6
1. The Need for a more sustainable lifestyle .................................................................. 6 2. The Zeitz Foundation and the GER certification ..................................................... 7 3. Wolwedans and the NamibRand private nature reserve .................................... 9
B. Purpose of the study .......................................................................................... 11 C. Definitions ............................................................................................................. 12
III. LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................ 14 A. Sustainable development ................................................................................ 15 B. Ecotourism ............................................................................................................ 17 C. Sustainable tourism certification ................................................................. 18
1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 18 2. Benefits and pitfalls .......................................................................................................... 20 3. Developing ecotourism certification criteria ........................................................ 21 4. Current concerns ................................................................................................................ 23
D. Zeitz Foundation’s GER Certification and E4C-Plan ................................ 24 1. Zeitz Foundation’s 4Cs ..................................................................................................... 24 2. Global Ecosphere Retreat (GER) certification process ...................................... 26 3. The E4C-Plan ....................................................................................................................... 27
E. Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 30
IV. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ................................................................................. 32 A. Research design and strategy ......................................................................... 32
1. Phase A: Short investigation into Wolwedans and the 4Cs ............................. 34 2. Phase B: Participant-observation during E4C-Plan development ................ 34 3. Phase C: Semi-structured in-depth interviews ...................................................... 35
B. Research sample selection .............................................................................. 36 C. Data analysis ........................................................................................................ 37
V. RESEARCH FINDINGS, ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION ..................................... 38 A. Wolwedans and the NamibRand Nature Reserve ................................... 38
1. NamibRand Nature Reserve ......................................................................................... 38 History ........................................................................................................................... 38 NamibRand Nature Reserve today ................................................................... 39 Concessionaires ........................................................................................................ 40 Aims................................................................................................................................ 40 Resource management and special projects ................................................ 41
2. Wolwedans Collection ..................................................................................................... 44 History ........................................................................................................................... 44 Product offering ........................................................................................................ 45 Wolwedans Village .................................................................................................. 47 Logistics and budgeting ......................................................................................... 48 Management structure ........................................................................................... 49 Leadership and culture .......................................................................................... 50 Creative projects and activities .......................................................................... 56 The future .................................................................................................................... 60
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 4
B. GER Certification ................................................................................................. 61 1. Impact of the GER certification ................................................................................... 62 2. Impact of the E4C adaptive management approach ......................................... 64
Zietz foundation ........................................................................................................ 64 Wolwedans .................................................................................................................. 65
VI. RESEARCH CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................... 69 1. Conservation ........................................................................................................................ 69 2. Commerce ............................................................................................................................. 71 3. Community ........................................................................................................................... 72 4. Culture .................................................................................................................................... 74 5. The E4C Structure ............................................................................................................. 75 6. The Wolwedans ‘Movement .......................................................................................... 76
VII. FUTURE RESEARCH ................................................................................................. 77
VIII. BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................ 78
IX. APPENDICES .............................................................................................................. 82 Appendix 1: Formal Interviewees ..................................................................... 82
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 5
I. PREFACE
In light of the pressing need for but also the growing trend in conservation and
ecotourism, certification of sustainable development strives to promote high
standards of eco-tourism. Evidence of its efficacy can be more aptly ascertained
in the light of recent developments in the codification of specific criteria that are
adapted for the context specific nature of sustainability. It is for this reason that a
study of the current management practices and strategies of the Wolwedans, a
ecotourism operation within the NamibRand private nature reserve in Namibia,
is not only valuable as a cross-section of an organisation that exemplifies an as
yet undefined ideal in standards of ecotourism, but is also valuable in
determining that which makes Wolwedans unique. It is the underlying reasoning
behind the innovative initiatives of Wolwedans management that will facilitate
an understanding of the driving forces behind sustainable development. Such an
understanding necessarily entails sensitivity to the specific political, economic,
historical and environmental context within which management decisions are
made. Where applicable these influences will be discussed as part of the findings
captured within this report.
Over and above the value that such an exploration holds for the ecotourism
industry, the problems with defining appropriate certification criteria and the
questionable practical use and application thereof also provide valuable insight
for practitioners of ecotourism that hope to further their competitive advantage
while actively promoting sustainable development. In light of the vagueness of
current certification criteria, the new adaptive management approach, captured
within the Zeitz foundations GER certification, holds the promise of
collaboratively building a library of context specific criteria whereby superior
overall certification criteria can be developed. Further the report highlights two
aspects: Firstly the potential promise that the GER certification scheme holds for
an exemplary ecotourism operator such as Wolwedans, and secondly the trouble
quantifying the extent to which certification is constructive in promoting the
standards of sustainable ecotourism that it sets out to measure.
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 6
II. INTRODUCTION
A. Background
1. The Need for a more sustainable lifestyle
In 2001 the United Nations initiated the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
(MA). Its objective was to assess global ecosystem changes and the ramifications
thereof for the well being of humanity and to provide scientific justification for
taking action to increase conservation and the sustainable use of the world’s
ecosystems. The project was finally completed in 2005 after four years of
rigorous study involving over 1,360 experts worldwide (Sarukán and Whyte,
2005).
Some of the key messages can be summaries as follows:
We live in a finite world and depend on nature and the world’s ecosystems to
provide us with the means and conditions for a healthy and secure life. Over
recent decades humanity has seriously weakened nature’s ability to continue
providing and replenish key services such as water and air purification, energy
and food resources, protection from disasters and the provision of medicines.
We also stand on the brink of the largest extinction of species every witnessed.
The reports hold that if we do not change our attitudes and actions the pressure
and degradation of our ecosystems will continue to increase, leaving humanity
unable to attend to global concerns such as poverty, hunger, and disease
(Sarukán and Whyte, 2005).
Although these issues have received a vast amount of theoretical research and
have been commonly known for many years already, the world is finally waking
up to the fact that it is a reality, which demands action (Sarukán and Whyte,
2005). Thankfully the debate about the validity of these arguments subsided and
has been replaced by a more constructive discourse aspiring to determine: What
does it mean to live sustainably? How would such a world look like? How do we
go about changing our ways, increase conservation efforts, and protect the
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 7
ecosphere in order to live a more sustainable life in tune with the earth natural
systems?
Recognizing the need to stimulate further debate, innovation thinking and new
research in the wake of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, the United
Nations launched the United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable
Development (2005-2014). As a first step towards promoting a change in
attitudes, their objectives include reshaping the current education systems to
include sustainable development and holistic thinking principles (UNESCO,
2010).
The MA proposed four main areas of focus:
“Focus on holistic decision-making incorporating all ecosystem factors,
and change the economic environment to reflect the importance of the
system.
Improve policy, planning and management
Influence individual behavior
Develop and use environment friendly technology” (Sarukán and Whyte,
2005:21).
It is the purpose of this research project to contribute towards improving
sustainable management and planning practices by exploring the planed
adoption of the recently developed and innovative adaptive sustainable
management system that forms the basis of the GER sustainability certification
to Wolwedans, one of the world’s leading ecotourism ventures.
2. The Zeitz Foundation and the GER certification
Jochen Zeitz founded the Zeitz Foundation in 2008, a non-profit organization
established and committed to improving and maintaining the integrity of the
world’s ecosystems “through effective and sustainable management practices
that ensure ecosystems continue to deliver services - such as clean water - for
the benefit of mankind” (Zeitz Foundation, 2010a). The Zeitz Foundation has
developed, as part or the Global Ecosphere Retreat (GER) Certification scheme, a
sustainable development management system called the E4C-Plan of which more
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 8
detail is provided in the literature review chapter below. (Zeitz Foundation,
2010a).
The foundation has identified nine sites around the world known for their
commitment to conservation and sustainability practices. To refine and finalize
the certification scheme’s assessment criteria each of the nine sites are required
to complete their own E4C management plan (see literature chapter below) on
which the Zeitz Foundation will then model their assessment criteria before
launching it to the public. All nine sites are committed and focused towards
conservation and building sustainable enterprises by fostering cultural
stewardship and community development. Most of these sites are privately
owned and using ecotourism as a driving force. They vary wildly in terms of size,
geographical location, ecological environments and business activities
(http://www.zeitzfoundation.org/).
Each of the sites is responsible for the development of their own unique
sustainability management plan using the E4C-framework provided by the Zeitz
Foundations. Independent auditors will evaluate each preliminary plan and
support sites in the development of their final versions. A site’s sustainability
management plan will constitute the core instrument used to evaluate if a site’s
activities meet the requirements to qualify for GER certification. (Zeitz
Foundation, 2010a).
These sites have been chosen such that they will help develop and evolve the
certification criteria for future applicants. It is exactly this, the determination of
suitable and measurable criteria, that is so fundamentally important for the
success of the GER certification as well as sustainable development activities
worldwide (http://www.zeitzfoundation.org/).
From the literature study below it will become evident that the establishment of
effective development criteria, especially within the ecotourism industry, has in
recent years been accepted as exceedingly important for enhancing sustainable
development worldwide, but a major stumbling block for its widespread use still
remains. The complexity of the concepts as well as the variety of environments
they should be applicable in, makes it is extremely difficult to translate
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 9
theoretical high-concept criteria into practical and measureable criteria that can
be used within organizations.
3. Wolwedans and the NamibRand private nature reserve
Located in southwestern Africa, Namibia covers an area of approximately 824
000 km2 and has a population of two million people. This makes it one of the
least populated countries in the world with an average population density of 2.3
inhabitants per square kilometer. Namibia finally gained independence from
South Africa in 1990 after and extended armed struggle. Fortunately nature
conservation already started receiving attention in seventies when the Nature
Conservation Ordinance of 1975 were passed allowing for the ownership of
common plain game. This allowed farmers to benefit financially through the
sustainable utilization of wildlife. It proved successful as livestock numbers
decreased substantially over the 30 year period from 1970 to 2000, while the
decreasing wildlife numbers on private land have grown over a 100% over the
same period (Barnes and Jones, 2009 in NamibRand Nature Reserve, 2009).
Furthermore the extremely low and highly sporadic rainfall attest to the hyper-
arid coastal desert region’s tough environment, receiving on average 70mm of
rain per annum. This limits livestock farming opportunities in favor of game
(NamibRand Nature Reserve, 2009).
The NamibRand Nature Reserve located in the arid southwest of Namibia, is a
private nature reserve and with over 172 000 ha is one of the largest private
conservation areas in Southern Africa. Established to protect and conserve the
unique ecology and wildlife the Reserve rehabilitated 13 former livestock farms
into one fence free conversation area that shares a 100km border with the
Namib-Naukluft National Park (NamibRand Nature Reserve, 2009).
The success of the NamibRand Nature Reserve is largely attributed to their
strong commitment towards conservation, while employing concessionaires,
such as Wolwedans run commercial ecotourism ventures to focus on the
financial sustainability of the whole operation (NamibRand Nature Reserve,
2009).
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 10
Wolwedans ensures the financial sustainability of NamibRand through providing
“high quality, low-impact” (http://www.wolwedans-namibia.com/history.htm)
ecotourism products that is not only in line with the goals of the NamibRand
Nature Reserve, but attracts tourists for its lofty aims and way of doing things.
These aims include the protection of the area’s rich biodiversity and its fragile
ecosystems; the facilitation of seasonal migratory routes; ecologically
sustainable commercial utilization to ensure the continuance of conservation by
making it financially independent, their authentic commitment to social
responsibility, and the innovative projects undertaken that builds capacity
within the tourism industry in Namibia (http://www.wolwedans-
namibia.com/history.htm).
It is the means to this end that is the exploration area of this research project and
while the focus is largely on Wolwedans as an ecotourism operator its symbiotic
and integral relationship means that it cannot be separated from the NamibRand
Nature Reserve activities. Some of the innovative strategies and activities they
are engaged in include; social upliftment and community development; outreach
to predator livestock management on neighbouring farms (this touches on the
controversial trapping of wild cats where capture and release is preferable);
NaDEET, the Namib Desert Environment Education Trust, which focuses on
environmental awareness and sustainable living education; NARC, the
NamibRand Desert Research and Awareness Centre that aims to provide
resources for conservation research, and the cultivation of medicinal plants
(http://www.wolwedans-namibia.com/resource_management.htm). Wolwedans
is further involved in their community and the social capital of their employees
through Wolwedans Foundation, which not only entails the granting of bursaries
to employees for further studies in conservation and hospitality but also includes
the Wolwedans Desert Academy. This drives the hospitality and eco-tourism
industry nationally through on-site experience and classes
(http://www.wolwedans-namibia.com/foundation_projects.htm).
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 11
B. Purpose of the study
The above illustrates clearly the reasons for the Zeitz Foundation’s consideration
of Wolwedans as one of the nine sites targeted to develop the GER certification.
The first phase of this groundbreaking project is scheduled for completion in
early 2011. The certification process as a whole is described in detail in the
literature review, but it is the first phase, the preliminary E4C-Plan that forms
the area of exploration of this research project. This is an in-depth self-
assessment of how the existing management, strategy and planning of
Wolwedans correlates with the 4C’s, which are conservation, commerce,
community and culture. The E4C-Plan requires the inclusion of short-, medium-
and long-term objectives for each of the 4Cs. While Wolwedans has not
necessarily developed such all-encompassing plans, the process will encourage
management to cement these principles as part of the business culture
(Klemmer, 2010).
While the drafting of the preliminary plan is a crosscut of the status quo, offering
valuable insight into the workings of an organisation deserving of certification by
virtue of being an indirect founder of as yet undefined principles that the Zeitz
Foundation will codify; never the less, the true value of the research report is its
exploration of three aspects:
1. The opportunity to investigate the current management practices and
strategic planning of Wolwedans; the contributors to its obvious success and
those that are superfluous or counterproductive.
2. The influence of the political and economic national context on management
choices regarding the development of the myriad projects and initiatives at
Wolwedans. These external limitations and incentives will aid in understanding
what makes Wolwedans unique and what the origin is of many of its innovative
initiatives.
3. While the preliminary E4C-Plan is being drafted its perceived usefulness will
be explored as part of this research. Further, the obstacles that arise in the
implementation of the E4C framework during the drafting process will be noted
for the purpose of informing future GER certification candidates.
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 12
As the literature review will demonstrate, a disparity exits between conservation
and sustainable development aims and the practical implementation thereof
within eco-tourism. The purpose of the certification process is to attempt a
codification of these standards that provide guidelines for their practical
implementation. An explorative study is perfectly suited to establishing, not only
the merits of the practice followed by Wolwedans, but also the merits of the
certification process itself. Furthermore, the other eight sites undergoing the
certification process will be able to derive benefit from the precedent set by
Wolwedans and this research report.
C. Definitions
CEO – Chief Executive Officer
4C – Refers to the four “C”s of Zeitz Foundation’s sustainability model,
namely: Conservation, Community, Culture, Commerce
E4C – Refers to the sustainability management plan of the Zeitz
Foundation, the E4C-Plan. The “E” refers to Ecosphere goals. And
the “4C” as defined above
EIA – Environmental Impact Assessment
GER – Global Ecosphere Retreat. The name of the Zeitz Foundation
Certification scheme
GSTC – The Global Sustainable Tourism Criteria
LRD – Long Run Destination, the term used to refer to GER certified sites
MA – UN’s Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
NaDEET – The Namib Desert Environment Education Trust
NRAC – NamibRand Desert Research and Awareness Centre
NRCF – NamibRand Conservation Foundation
NRNR – Namib Rand Nature Reserve
NTA – Namibian Training Authority
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 13
NQA – Namibian Qualifications Authority
SME – Small to Medium Enterprise
STSC – Sustainable Tourism Stewardship Council
TSC – Tourism Sustainability Council
UN – United Nations
UNESCO – United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
WCED – World Commission on Environment and Development
WDA – Wolwedans Desert Academy
ZF – Zeitz Foundation
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 14
III. LITERATURE REVIEW
The ecosphere can be defined as all of earth’s processes and resources governing
the existence and survival of all organisms including humans. For centuries
humanities impact on the ecosphere was inconsequential, but in the last century
the rate at which and the method by which people consume the earth’s resources
has started to severely compromise the ecosphere’s health and in doing so the
long term future of humankind (Gray and Davidson, 2000).
Wilderness areas that once covered the majority of the earth’s surface and
sustaining the ecosphere have drastically reduced under humanities influence.
The remaining areas are increasingly under pressure and their existence and
long-term survival ironically depends on and requires concrete action from
humankind.
The relationship between the ecosphere and humankind has to be redefined and
unchecked human behaviour brought into balance with Earth’s metabolism. This
view have seen massive debate over the last two decades which resulted in the
emergence of a plethora of ideas, guidelines and recommendations in order to
find new ways to manage humanity’s interaction with and its impact on the
earth’s ecosystems (Gray and Davidson, 2000).
The following literature review examines the definitions and meanings behind
the expressions: “sustainable development” and “ecosystem management”,
highlighting the progress that has been made thus far and the remaining
conflicts. It also addresses the lack of clarity regarding the best way in which to
manage and promote sustainable development in the context of wilderness
protection programs.
An overview of the development of certification schemes, their uses and benefits,
and more specifically, certification criteria, all relating to sustainable practices, is
presented. Focused mainly within the wilderness protection and tourism sphere,
certification is seen as a method of enhancing sustainable development practices
by supporting sustainable management activities. It will emerge from the
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 15
literature that the search for appropriate certification criteria have begun in
earnest, but is hampered by problems of practicality and implementation.
It will become evident that more empirical research is required in the field of
managing sustainable development effectively. More specifically, there is a need
for case studies that capture the complexity and inter-related dimensions of
sustainability practices in order to shed light on some of the innovative
techniques and methods used to manage wilderness protection programs, and in
a broader sense, any sustainable development practices, more effectively.
Furthermore, a case for certification still has to be made.
A. Sustainable development
The two most influential publications forming the basis of most sustainable
development models are firstly the 1987 Brundtland Commission report (WCED
et al, 1987), and secondly the 1992 Agenda 21 from the United Nations
Conference on Environment and Development called “Earth Summit (Landorf,
2009). The Brundland Report states “sustainable development” is “development
that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future
generations to meet their own needs” (WCED et al, 1987). It also goes further to
define four key principles for sustainability: “(1) holistic planning and strategic
decision-making; (2) preservation of essential ecological processes; (3)
protection of human heritage and biodiversity; and (4) growth that can be
sustained over the long term” (WCED et al, 1987). Although this remains the
most widely used definition its interpretation and practical application is equally
widely debated (Hunter, 1997). In terms of ecosphere health and wilderness
conservation the debate is even more pronounced as the word “development”
may suggest only a slight variation of the status quo, while still supporting a
perpetual growth model which would inevitably result in further deterioration
of the planet’s ecosystems (Dovers and Handmer, 1993; Pearce et al, 1989; Rees,
1990; Robinson, 1993; Robinson et al, 1990; Willers, 1994; citied in Gray and
Davidson, 2000).
In answer to the debate over the vagueness of the conceptual definition of
sustainable development (Newton and Freyfogle, 2005) and the lack of
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 16
established methods to reach its lofty ideals (Gray and Davidson, 2000), Agenda
21 proposed tangible strategies for its implementation. Central to the strategies
proposed is the concept of a long-term balance between three key dimensions:
economic, environmental and social (Landorf, 2009).
Kahn (cited in Landorf, 2009) argued that the only way to do this is by viewing
the three dimensions as dynamic elements of a complex, integrating and
interlinking system. Therefore each dimension cannot be treated in isolation and
instead requires a multifaceted approach with inevitable trade-offs between the
various dimensions. Economic sustainability thus implies a production system
that only produces to satisfy present needs of consumption without
compromising on social fairness and the needs of future generations.
Environmental sustainability in turn requires resource consumption to be no
faster than the ecosphere can replenish them and waste generation to be no
faster than the environment can absorb it without adversely affecting
biodiversity and ecosystem integrity. Finally, social sustainability demands
equity, empowerment, cultural identity and societal stability over perpetual
economic growth (Landorf, 2009). Relating this to conservation; if focus were to
rest solely on biodiversity and ecological processes, the ideal landscape would
contain no people at all. This is unrealistic and shows no concern for economic
viability of proper land use or the importance of local culture and social welfare
(Newton and Freyfogle, 2005).
The complexity of these issues requires critical decision making, taking into
account what trade-offs are reasonable and to whom, how benefits are shared
between stakeholders and what elements ought to be measured within the
specific environment (Richards and Hall, 2000; citied in Landorf, 2009). To
illustrate, the Brundtland Report indentified the importance of economic growth
in developing nations, but failed to balance the opposing unsustainable wealthy
lifestyles of the developed nations (Hunter, 1997). In addition, Basiago (1998;
citied in Landorf, 2009) shows that due to the complexity of creating a fully
integrated economic, environmental and social system the Agenda 21 strategy
has not been widely adopted. However, even though a balanced system’s
approach is difficult at best, there is growing consensus that at least using a
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 17
strategic approach towards sustainable development planning and decision
making has positive results (Hall, Jenkins, & Kearsley, 2000; Simpson, 2001;
citied in Landorf, 2009).
Management literature on strategic planning suggests using a formalized goal-
oriented approach to strengthen long term performance. This approach relies
upon the inclusion of multiple key stakeholders opinions, attitudes and values,
and should take into account various situational influences (Mintzberg, 1994).
Applied to wilderness protection projects and ecotourism ventures, strategic
management approaches thus advocate for the inclusion of all stakeholder needs
and other local influences within a systematic process guided by a strategic
vision. Although it is again difficult to balance all stakeholder needs, this process
is congruent with sustainable development principles as noted earlier (Landorf,
2009). In addition to the difficulty inherent in balancing stakeholder
participation in practice, there is also some disparity on a strategic planning level
with regards to the three proposed dimensions in Agenda 21 (economic,
environmental and social). Both environmental and economic aspirations are
generally more quantifiable and so more easily comparable than social
aspirations, making fair treatment increasingly problematic (Agyeman and
Evans, 2003).
B. Ecotourism
Tourism has become the mainstay by which wilderness protection programs are
kept economically viable and in terms of this research project warrants a short
exploration before delving into sustainable certification literature.
The term ecotourism was coined to distinguish between general nature related
tourism ventures and projects committed towards sustainable development and
conservation using tourism as their mainstay. Initially defined as “responsible
travel to natural areas, which conserves the environment and improves the
welfare of local people” (Honey and Stewart, 2002a:1) the concept has since
come to be:
“a multifaceted concept that involves travel to fragile, pristine, and
usually protected areas. It strives to be low impact and (usually)
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 18
small scale; helps educate the traveler; provides funds for
conservation; directly benefits the economic development and
political empowerment of local communities; and fosters respect
for different cultures and human rights” (Honey and Stewart,
2002b: 2).
Ecotourism thus “looks beyond the tourism entity itself and asks how
ecotourism companies can contribute to conservation of protected areas and
what mechanisms are in place to ensure that benefits reach local people” (Honey
and Stewart, 2002a: 63).
Three broad trends can be indentified in ecotourism today. The most common
trend is known as “ecotourism light” which refers to minor changes usually of a
cost-saving nature. Driven largely by big corporations, this is not fundamental
reform towards sustainable practices in terms of environmental and
socioeconomic principles. The second trend aptly labeled “greenwashing” refers
to businesses and projects that use eco-friendly marketing language as not to
miss out on the growing demand within the ecotourism market. An example of
this would be companies or projects that proclaim ecological sound practices
while referring to water guzzling luxury beach resorts sporting golf courses and
private villas on ecologically sensitive beaches or estuaries. The third trend
refers to genuine ecotourism operations that originate from ecosystem concepts
that incorporate the various environmental and human elements (social,
cultural, political and economic) that are affected by tourism (Honey and
Stewart, 2002b). It is the third and most “authentic ecotourism” that this report
refers unless otherwise stated.
C. Sustainable tourism certification
1. Introduction
Certification refers to a “procedure that audits and gives written assurance that a
facility, product, process, service or management system meets specific
standards” (Honey and Steward, 2002b:4). Furthermore, it usually awards a
logo or seal when a set of standards or criteria are met or exceeded.
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 19
Since the 1992 Earth Summit’s establishment of Agenda 21, setting out a broad
path and guidelines for businesses to adopt sustainable development principles,
dozens of certification programs and codes of conduct, benchmarking, awards,
and “best practices” initiatives have been introduced. These initiatives are
mainly focused on championing sustainability by encouraging preferential
consumption of goods and services from organizations that act in accordance
with high environmental and social standards (Medina, 2005).
One of the major concerns raised by critics pertains to the sheer number of
initiatives: There are 104 certification schemes within the travel and tourism
industry alone, most of which focus specifically on organizations engaging in
superior sustainable practices (Medina, 2005). The variance in standards
between these initiatives inevitably confuses consumers thereby lowering
credibility and weakening the potential success of certification to increase
sustainability (Crabtree, O'Reilly, and Worboys, 2002).
Another concern raised is the dominance of developed countries over the
involvement of the developing world in the drafting processes of certification
schemes. Allegedly this could result in standards that are low enough to protect
the interests of the rich and not high enough to demand any sense of true reform,
while being too high for small to medium enterprises to comply with and thereby
further adding to the existing inequality divide (Medina, 2005).
In 2000 an international workshop was held to address some of the concerns
related to the proliferation of certification schemes, which resulted in the
Mohonk Agreement, a baseline set of criteria for the creation of certifications.
The Mohonk Agreement for the first time separated and clearly differentiated
between sustainable tourism criteria that can be applied to any kind of tourism,
and a subset thereof; an extra set of criteria for ecotourism which is more
stringent (Crabtree et al, 2002). The agreement has set in motion the concept of
a global umbrella certification program for the accreditation of localized
certification schemes. Through the collaborative effort of the UN Foundation, the
Rainforest Alliance and others, the Tourism Sustainability Council (TSC) was
formed by the merger of the Partnership for Global Sustainable Tourism Criteria
(GSTC) and the Sustainable Tourism Stewardship Council (STSC) in September
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 20
2009 (http://www.sustainabletourismcriteria.org/index.php?option=
com_content&task=view&id=266&Itemid=483).
The major objectives of the TSC includes the development of baseline criteria
and recommended performance indicators for various sectors within the
tourism industry as well as procedural criteria that sustainable tourism
certification schemes must meet
(http://www.sustainabletourismcriteria.org/index.php).
2. Benefits and pitfalls
Crabtree et al (2002) suggested at the World Ecotourism summit that sound and
effective ecotourism certification could provide noteworthy benefits that
guarantee commitment to sustainability and conservation, by raising industry
standards, providing marketing advantages and furnishing the ecotourism
providers with a means of self-regulation. These providers would not only obtain
a competitive advantage due to consumer recognition and product
differentiation, but also gain access to a community of shared knowledge and
sound management frameworks to better guide their sustainability initiatives.
Conservation efforts will benefit from the use of sound management practices
and local communities will receive better and more appropriate returns. It also
allows local communities and other stakeholders such as ecotourism consumers
to make wiser and more responsible decisions. The use of best practice
benchmarks ensures continual improvement and serves as a blueprint for
existing and developing ecotourism projects (Crabtree et al, 2002).
Evident from the literature on sustainable development and management
approaches discussed earlier, there is a clear need to codify the conceptual ideas
and theories into clearly defined quantifiable units. Certification schemes are
also seen as tools with which this could be done (Medina, 2005). The Zeitz
Foundation aims at exactly this by using their GER certification process to
develop measurable best practices by initially certifying ten carefully selected
and highly committed sustainable development organizations to learn form their
experiences and current sustainable practices.
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 21
Although sustainable development, particularly when it comes to wilderness
protection programs, aims to tangibly benefit conservation and community
development, certification should be able to measure the benefits to the
environment, local communities and host countries through the use of
standardized and specific environmental and socio-economic criteria (Honey,
2002). The rise of ecotourism over the last two decades as the fastest growing
sector in the travel and tourism industry worldwide has raised concerns about
the indiscriminate use of ecotourism with little regard to its conservationist
principles. This watering down, known as greenwashing and ecotourism-lite,
diminishes the capacity of ecotourism to truly revolutionize the world through
sustainable development (Medina, 2005). This further highlights the need for
clear standards, tools and criteria by which an organization’s efforts can be
measured. In addition to the role of certification in setting minimum standards in
terms of sustainable tourism it should be used in an effort to distinguish and
promote leading sustainable development projects (Honey, 2002).
3. Developing ecotourism certification criteria
A crucial factor that determines the success and effectiveness of certification is
the use of an appropriate set of criteria to measure and benchmark the various
aspects of sustainable development such as ecological conservation and local
community benefits.
The development of the Mohonk Agreement in 2000 was the first important step
towards generating measurable criteria for certification. The criteria specifically
related to ecotourism are those indicators directly linked to the fundamental
concepts defining ecotourism, namely:
“Focus on personal experiences of nature to lead to greater
understanding and appreciation.
Interpretation and environmental awareness of nature, local society, and
culture.
Positive and active contributions to conservation of natural areas or
biodiversity.
Economic, social, and cultural benefits for local communities.
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 22
Fostering of community involvement, where appropriate.
Locally appropriate scale and design for lodging, tours and attractions.
Minimal impact on and presentation of local (indigenous) culture”
(Mohonk Agreement, 2000:100).
The theoretical and abstract nature of some of the concepts lack concrete
definitions that can be translated into measurable indicators. This is especially
true of the social and cultural factors, while economic considerations are much
easier to specify (Medina, 2005). The trend mirrors the similar sentiment found
earlier within the sustainability literature study.
The Mohonk Agreement also prescribes an overall framework for the
development of certification schemes stating “the development of a certification
scheme should be a participatory, multi-stakeholder and multi-sectoral process
(including representatives from local communities, tourism businesses, non-
governmental organizations, community-based organizations, government, and
others)” (Mohonk, 2000:97).
Multiple stakeholder involvement is however tricky due to the “simultaneously
global and local scope of the problems ecotourism is trying to address.” (Medina,
2005:285) While global standards such as those being set by the newly formed
Sustainable Tourism Council (STC) would help legitimize both certification
problems and ecotourism ventures, it may unavoidably lead to vague and overly
general recommendations. Furthermore, Medina (2005) provides two examples
of national certification schemes, the Nature and Tourism Accreditation Program
(NEAP) in Australia and the Costa Rican Certification for Sustainable Tourism
(CST), both of which show positive results while differing widely in terms of
detailed criteria tailored to the local requirements. In order to accommodate
both national and international efforts the literature suggests that certification
criteria should be developed locally through community and multi-stakeholder
participation to satisfy the local or national need, while being guided by
international principles (Epler Wood & Halpenny, 2001 citied in Medina, 2005).
With the process of determining appropriate criteria for certification now
starting to gain momentum, there is a strong need for more empirical research
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 23
covering the latest innovative and pragmatic approaches being implemented
around the world to inform further research in this regard.
This research project endeavors to add valuable insight by highlighting current
activities implemented by one of the world’s leading wilderness protection
organizations. It may inform and link the conceptual frameworks of sustainable
development and pragmatic, responsible ecosystem management practices.
4. Current concerns
Crabtree et al (2002) discusses two major disadvantages of using a global
accreditation body to certify for other certification schemes. Firstly a global
accreditation body may add additional costs for sustainable ventures by having
to comply with less relevant or lower priority criteria in terms of the local or
regional needs. Secondly it adds an additional layer of authentication adding
more bureaucracy and cost (Crabtree et al, 2002). Furthermore, resent concerns
raised with regards to the newly formed global certification body, the Tourism
Sustainability Council (TSC), highlights the need for empirical research to help
clarify ways in which sustainable development practices, including ecological
management systems and ecotourism certification programs should be defined
and how it can add value and promote sustainable practices.
These concerns can be summarized as follows:
The level of impact tourists themselves have is not addressed in current
sustainable tourism criteria.
No indicators or objectives exist yet that can be used to measure and
report on progress achieved.
There is still confusion about how the accreditation process works and
what the exact criteria for accreditation schemes are or indeed how
problems of compliance will be handled.
The current criteria is very broadly defined, varied and not prioritized.
There is no indication of flexibility in terms of local concerns and
priorities.
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 24
Due to a lack of evidence to verify the effectiveness of certification the
commercial viability and usefulness of certification is also put into
question.
Current local and regional certification organizations raised concerns
over the possibility that an international accreditation scheme could
potentially compromise their authority.
(http://haroldgoodwin.blogware.com/blog/_archives/2010/2/4/444688
7.html;
http://haroldgoodwin.blogware.com/blog/_archives/2010/4/11/45027
27.html)
D. Zeitz Foundation’s GER Certification and E4C-Plan
1. Zeitz Foundation’s 4Cs
At the core of the sustainable development initiative, aimed at “strengthening
ecosphere safety” (Zeitz Foundation, 2010b:1), is the innovative 4C model
developed by the Zeitz Foundation. The 4C model refers to four “C”s:
Conservation, Community, Culture and Commerce (Zeitz Foundation, 2010a).
These directly relate to the sustainability literature’s Ecological, Social, Cultural
and Economics factors (Gray and Davidson, 2000).
Exploring each of the 4Cs in more detail:
Conservation
“Conservation is a core component amongst all Long Run
Destinations. They support the sustainable use of natural
resources and safeguard the integrity of the local ecosphere.
Activities in this dimension address issues related to ecosystem
management to provide ecosystem services sustainably as well as
management of energy, water, waste and biodiversity” (Zeitz
Foundation, 2010a).
Community
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 25
“People matter. Long Run Destinations support activities that
enhance the well‐being of all relevant communities who have a
socio‐economic or cultural relationship with the LRD or the land on
which the LRD is located. Activities in this dimension address fair
working conditions, local and regional relations, social ventures,
capacity building, community -based natural resource management
and support for small and medium enterprises (SMEs), among
others” (Zeitz Foundation, 2010a).
Culture
“Long Run Destinations strive to strengthen intercultural
understanding and relations, safeguarding cultural heritage while
raising awareness of cultural diversity. LRDs want to inspire
others to act in kind. Creative activities in this dimension
encompass all expressions of art - from local cuisine and
architecture to film and music, from sculpture to folk arts and
crafts ‐ as well as the promotion of social cohesion and interaction
through sport” (Zeitz Foundation, 2010a).
Commerce
“Commerce is an integral dimension because it affects the
sustainability of a destination inasmuch as it affects the people
who live in and near natural areas. LRDs strive to demonstrate that
they are economically sustainable forms of land use, which
includes not only the landholder but also people who live on or
adjacent to the property. Sustainable commercial operations offer
the opportunity to provide income streams for people, as well as
for reinvesting back into the initiatives in each of the 4Cs
dimensions. These include activities such as reforestation, the
harvesting and trading of Non‐timber Forest Products (NTFPs),
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 26
agriculture/horticulture, wildlife management, and livestock
ranching” (Zeitz Foundation, 2010a).
2. Global Ecosphere Retreat (GER) certification process
The Zeitz Foundation’s Global Ecosphere Retreat (GER) Certification process has
been developed to promote and develop sustainable thinking around the globe.
It aims to ensure that best practices in sustainability are adhered to and
innovative approaches experimented with by advocating the use of sustainable
ecosystem management practices (Zeitz Foundation, 2010a).
The Certification Procedure itself is shown below in Figure 1:
Figure 1: The GER Certification Process
The certification is based on a continual reiterative approach in which the main
component, a site’s E4C sustainability management plan, is reviewed and
updated at least every 2-3 years.
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 27
In order to achieve certification a prospective site starts off (STEP 1: Self-
Assessment) with a self-evaluation of its own activities with respect to each of
the 4Cs and the creation of a preliminary sustainability management plan (E4C-
Plan) specific to their local environment. This is then followed (STEP 2:
Assessment) by an independent audited assessment together with a feedback
session with the Zeitz Foundation in order to ensure that the basic criteria are
met and the E4C-Plan is updated and finalized. The self-assessment and
independent assessment results, together with the final E4C-Plan are used to
determine if the site qualifies for certification (Zeitz Foundation, 2010a).
The E4C-Plan requires continual updating and is subject to bi-annual follow-up
reviews in order to assess whether a site remains committed to sustainability
with respect to each of the 4Cs and is delivering upon the detailed plans laid out
within the E4C-Plan (Zeitz Foundation, 2010a).
3. The E4C-Plan
At the core of the GER certification process is the creation of an E4C-Plan unique
to each prospective site. The E4C-Plan is a strategic planning document that
enables a site to plan systematically and monitor their progress in terms set and
with measurable outcomes. It consists of two sections:
(1) The “E” stands for ecosphere safety, which is defined as the preservation of
all of earth’s complex and interlinked ecosystems. The purpose of which is to
maintain the whole ecosphere in the healthiest state possible. Within the
E4C-Plan, this part contains strategic long-term goals of the site aimed at
maintaining and restoring ecosphere safety (Zeitz Foundation, 2010a).
(2) The “4C” refers to the four core dimensions of an ecosystem management
approach: Conservation, Community, Culture and Commerce. Within the
E4C-Plan each of the four dimensions gets described in terms of outcomes,
results and activities. The purpose is to translate the strategic long term
goals, determined in part 1, into tangible medium and short term objectives
which are actionable, measurable and achievable (Zeitz Foundation, 2010a).
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 28
Figure 2: The E4C pyramid framework showing the 4Cs
The E4C-Plan is meant to function as an adaptive and pragmatic planning tool for
use by management in order to plan, execute and track an organization’s
progress towards sustainability and ecosphere safety. For it to be successful it
must be easy to use, understandable, and continually updated to keep it relevant.
(Zeitz Foundation, 2010a) With regards to the GER certification, the E4C-Plan is
an effective tool to communicate a site’s desired long-term goals and its
anticipated progress to the Zeitz Foundation. This enables the Zeitz Foundation
to continually adapt and build on the GER certification criteria in order to
maintain relevance and continually drive best practices to ultimately strengthen
the integrity of all ecosystems and their ability to deliver services (Zeitz
Foundation, 2010a).
The structure of the E4C-Plan consists of four layers. Impact refers to long-term
high-level concepts for each of the 4Cs, while Activities as the bottom alludes to
short-term action taken by a site in order ultimately achieve the medium and
long term goals.
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 29
Figure 3: The E4C-Plan pyramid structure (Zeitz Foundation, 2010a).
Aspirational goals
The aspirational goals refer to the desired long-
term impact a site aims to achieve within each of
the 4Cs. The Zietz Foundation requires the
following set of goals.
Figure 4: The required aspirational goals (Zeitz Foundation, 2010a)
Outcomes
The second level represents a set of short- to
medium-term outcomes that sites sets out to
achieve. The mandatory set provided by the Zeitz
Foundation is shown below.
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 30
Figure 5: The required outcomes (Zeitz Foundation, 2010a)
Results
Results refer to a grouping of one or more
short-term activities that describes to a logical
unit of growth. Results will be site specific.
Activities
Activities refer to the specific actions that has to
be taken or implemented in order to ensure
that Results are attained, Outcomes achieved
and ultimately the desired Impact realized.
(Zeitz Foundation, 2010a)
E. Conclusion
Not only is the practical application of sustainable development questioned but
so are its merits in that it implies a perpetual growth model in direct opposition
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 31
to the possibility of supporting the conservation of earth’s ecosystems. The key
dimensions; economic, environmental and social as introduced by agenda 21,
highlight similar trade-offs between the different dimensions as a result of their
interrelatedness. The evidence of a growing consensus that using a strategic
approach has positive results suggests a recognition that various situational
influences and stakeholder interests must be included in a formalised goal-
oriented approach. Sustainable development must also take cognisance of social
interests as albeit more quantifiable, economic support for conservation cannot
prevail over social concerns if it is to be sustainable. Yet even arguments that
state ecology is the most important factor for survival, emphasise the
problematic vagueness of sustainability (Newton, 2005:8). The benefit of GER
certification is that its structure demands clarity and precision in the definition
of long-term goals supported by tangible short-term results obtainable.
Certification audits the extent of ‘authentic ecotourism’ but the sheer number of
initiatives, variations in standards and prejudice to the developing world makes
it problematic. In response, the Mohonk agreement has, for the first time,
developed a global umbrella programme that takes account of generalisable
sustainable tourism criteria and those that are more context specific and thus
more stringent. This offsets the superficiality of certification by setting an
attainable benchmark however difficulty those criteria may be to establish. Not
only will this support competitive advantage and promote conservation but it
will also provide a blueprint for future certification projects. The Zeitz
Foundation’s GER certification will achieve exactly such codification by
providing the framework of a strategic management plan within which the
specific select sites will develop the criteria themselves. The logic that it is
exactly those sites that clearly do meet the desired standards that are most
capable of determining the grass-roots criteria is sound and the involvement of
Wolwedans will be groundbreaking for this reason. The very fact that the case
study is context specific will contribute to its usefulness for future research as a
result of the Mohonk agreement’s recognition of the umbrella criteria as well as
its more stringent subsets.
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 32
IV. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
A. Research design and strategy
A case study is an empirical enquiry that
o “Investigate a contemporary phenomenon within a real-life
context, especially when
o [T]he boundaries between phenomenon and context are not
clearly evident.” (Yin, 1994:13)
This basically means that a case study purposefully allows for the inclusion of
the “contextual conditions” (Yin, 1994:13) which other methods such as
quantitative analysis or other deductive theory testing does not.
The case study approach is particularly well suited for this research project as a
result of the various influences that impact management practices at
Wolwedans. These may include the political, social, environmental and historical
context, not only local but also regional and globally that informed and shaped
the development of the current management practice. The complex inter-
relationships between these elements are critical in understanding and
determining why and how Wolwedans has become such a role-model in the field
of sustainable development and ecotourism. Furthermore it should be
understood that these complex factors have certainly influenced the decisions of
Wolwedans management to get involved in and start innovative practices
specifically on the community and social development front (Yin, 1994).
To investigate the need for and impact of the new certification process and its
inherent new sustainable management process without understanding the
context and the various complexly interlinked factors that may be impacting the
outcome would deliver meaningless results.
The importance of context is reiterated by the current concerns raised regarding
global certification schemes and the vagueness of the theoretical concepts they
prescribe. The theoretic concepts do not translate easily into measurable
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 33
indicators as a result of the variedness of the contexts in which they are required
to apply.
A case study provides a mechanism by which the context, hand-on activities and
methods employed by Wolwedans currently can be explored, as well as the
conflicts that arise while trying to apply some of the global sustainable
certification concepts to local conditions as part of the GER certification process
investigated (Leedy and Ormrod, 2009). This research, through the use of a well-
structured case study, can help the global community build better and more
fruitful certification and sustainable development criteria to the benefit of new
and existing organizations.
Furthermore this research benefits from the use of a case study approach, as it
does not require the formulation of a hypothesis prior to starting fieldwork (Yin,
1994). In this case, introducing a hypothesis beforehand, for example ‘that the
GER certification and E4C-Plan would have a definitively positive influence on
the operations and long term goals of Wolwedans, would necessarily introduce
an unhealthy bias which could seriously skew data collection and analysis.
The research methodology used in this case study was composed of three
distinct phases, the latter two of which occurred concurrently during a two-week
visit to Namibia. The first phase consisted of a short investigation to develop a
good understanding of the current activities of Wolwedans and how they fit into
the 4Cs: Conservation, Culture, Community, and Commerce. These findings,
together with the literary study from the previous chapter, were used to develop
discussion topics that formed the basis of the semi-structured interviews in
phase three. The second phase consisted of participant-observation (Yin,
1994:80) sessions while the unique E4Cs-Plan of Wolwedans were being
developed. The third phase comprised of semi-structured interviews that
explored management activities and strategic decision-making at Wolwedans, as
well as the practical usefulness and value of the E4C-Plan and the GER
certification as a whole (Leedy and Ormrod, 2009).
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 34
1. Phase A: Short investigation into Wolwedans and the 4Cs
Phase A served as preparation for the visit to Namibia. Before traveling to
Namibia the researcher had to be knowledgeable about the activities of
Wolwedans and have a general understanding of how its various activities fit
into the 4Cs as described by the Zeitz Foundation.
It required investigating publically available data surrounding the activities of
Wolwedans, the methods and management techniques and the political, social,
historical and environmental context within which Wolwedans currently finds
itself. The investigation was further augmented by information and
documentation directly acquired from Wolwedans management.
The aim was not to develop an exhaustive list of all possible activities and factors
which may be affecting Wolwedans activities, but rather to identify the context
within which it operates and the main factors influencing them, including any
difficulties and problems they may be facing, or have faced in the past that has
lead to their current position.
Furthermore the information and knowledge gained from this investigation
guided the development of appropriate topics and questions that was used in the
interviews in Phase C.
2. Phase B: Participant-observation during E4C-Plan development
In Phase B the proposed plan was to partake in the development of the E4C-Plan
for Wolwedans together with management. Due to the perceived theoretical and
analytical nature of the E4C-plan and other time constraints however, the
Wolwedans team did not dedicate their time fully to the development of the plan.
This in itself is an important indicator reflecting the hesitancy of an organization
to assess themselves in this way. This may adversely impact the success of the
GER certification scheme if more organizations feel that the development of the
E4C-plan requires outside assistance due to a perceived lack of knowledge to
develop the plan themselves or other factors, such a lack of resources, that may
delay the development of the preliminary E4C-plan.
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 35
Participation thus shifted towards other ongoing activities that proved valuable
to gain a better insight into the Wolwedans team’s management style and
strategic approach. Additionally feedback from workshops held with the Zeitz
Foundation leading up to this research was discusses as part of the phase three’s
interviews.
As part of phase B a site visit and tour of all Wolwedans provided the
opportunity to experience both guests’ perspective for a while and then the
staff’s perspective for a while. This allowed the researcher to gain in-depth
knowledge and understanding of not only their current management practices,
but also how Wolwedans management interprets and understands the GER
certification and the E4C-Plan and how it can be used in a productive and
supportive way to aid them in management decision making.
Participating in some of the staff activities and social events in the evenings
provided the opportunity to elicit information from the Wolwedans staff
regarding their involvement in and perceptions of the management of
Wolwedans and the degree to which the GER Certification and the E4C-Plan may
influence their activities.
Field notes made during these daily sessions serves as written record. After each
day these notes where studied, categorized and any further thoughts or insights
were noted down at this stage (Yin, 1994).
3. Phase C: Semi-structured in-depth interviews
Yin (1994) states that interviews are the most important and essential source in
case studies research. The interviews were conducted at Windhoek
headquarters and Wolwedans itself. The bulk of the research data was collated
from these semi-structured in-dept face-to-face interviews. All formal
interviews were recorded and transcribed afterwards, while valuable
information gained through informal conversations where noted down
throughout or at the end of the day.
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 36
The questionnaire developed as part of phase A formed the basis of the
interviews, but in light of new thoughts and insights gained through both the
interview and the participant-observation phases the questionnaire evolved.
B. Research sample selection
The interviewees were selected to reflect a variety of important stakeholders
that in some way affect or are affect by the activities of Wolwedans. Due to the
nature of the research and the importance of determining the contextual
environment within which Wolwedans finds itself, external stakeholders formed
part of the research, however internal stakeholders, referring here to the full
Wolwedans management team still constituted the majority of the interviews.
External stakeholders were questioned in line with their level of involvement
with Wolwedans and where appropriate tailored extracts of the semi-structured
questionnaire were used reflecting the specific stakeholder’s role and connection
to Wolwedans.
Specifically, over the 12-day visit a total of nine semi-structured interviews were
conducted covering the whole senior management team of Wolwedans. A variety
informal discussions with Wolwedans staff members were held covering
hospitality staff, chefs, guides and carpenters over the 3-day visit to Wolwedans.
Six guests that included two local Namibians and four international guests were
also queried regarding their perceptions of Wolwedans and ecotourism and
sustainability certification. Additionally the representative of the Zeitz
Foundation where contacted telephonically beforehand and one afternoon was
spent observing the staff at NICE, the restaurant and chef training establishment
in Windhoek.
Furthermore information packs where received from the Namibian Tourism
Board and the Ministry of Environment and Tourism. A very informative
research report analyzing Wolwedans in terms of the Namibian EcoAwards
assessment criteria were also consulted. The Namibian EcoAwards is a local
ecotourism rating system developed by the Ministry of Environment and
Tourism in conjunction with other stakeholders that aim to promote responsible
tourism through certification. A one to five flower rating is given to an
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 37
organization depending on their score achieved on the assessment criteria, akin
to the five star rating system providing for hotels.
A semi-structured interview with the previous Control warden, now CEO of the
NamibRand Nature Reserve were also conducted and secured access to a wealth
of additional information regarding the Reserve and conservation related plans
and activities.
C. Data analysis
All formal interviews will be recorded and transcribed. Detailed notes will be
made during all formal and informal interviews and the participant-observation
phase. All insights and thoughts were noted down in writing.
Data analysis started after the first interview took place. The analysis process
entailed categorising the data into themes and indentifying their inter-
relationships (Leedy and Ormrod, 2009). As the data gathering process evolved,
so too did the analysis add and refine the themes and their inter-relationships.
Throughout the process the information where scrutinized for underlying
themes and patterns that describe the case more broadly. After concluding the
trip to Namibia the analysis were finalized by synthesizing to reflect more widely
applicable concepts. (Yin, 1994; Leedy and Ormrod, 2009).
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 38
V. RESEARCH FINDINGS, ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
A. Wolwedans and the NamibRand Nature Reserve
1. NamibRand Nature Reserve
“Image the flamboyant magnificence of the Sossusvlei dunes, the mystique and
subtle beauty of the Skeleton Coast and the legendary red sands of the Kalahari
synthesised into one multifaceted desert reserve and you have the NamibRand, a
privately owned conservation area of over 170 000 hectares. Add to it inselbergs
that look like beehives dripping with chocolate sauce, vast fields of mysterious
fairy circles, an intriguing history and a species-rich flora and fauna (including
Namibia’s only endemic, the Dune Lark) and you might have an inkling of what
makes this reserve so unusual.” Amy Schoemann, renowned Namibian
photographer.
History
The NamibRand Nature Reserve (NRNR) consists of 13 former livestock farms.
Karakul sheep, able to adapt to harsh environments and prized for their pelts,
were the most widely farmed livestock in the region. Starting in the nineteen-
seventies and eighties two events brought about the decline of the livestock
farming activities in southern Namibia. The anti-fur movement in Europe and the
USA resulted in a major decline in the fur industry, devastating the Karakul
sheep business in Namibia. Secondly, severe droughts starting in the early
eighties meant that other forms of farming, particularly cattle, where also not a
viable proposition. The only viable source of income remaining was game
(NamibRand Nature Reserve, 2007).
Widespread unchecked hunting activities (mainly of Springbok and Oryx)
depleted the antelope population so severely that hunting extended to the
neighboring Namib-Naukluft Park, further destroying the region’s ecological
balance.
At the time Johann Albrecht (Albi) Brückner, founder of the highly successful
South West Engineering company now known as NEC (Namibian Engineering
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 39
Consultants), bought three farms that still had some fauna and flora intact. It
became his philanthropic aim to create a private nature reserve to curb the
unsustainable farming and hunting practices and turn the area into a wildlife
sanctuary. Later the concept evolved in order for it to become economically self-
sustaining mainly through high-quality, low-impact tourism. The result was a
tourism venture called Wolwedans established in 1992. This idea was
groundbreaking and financially risky because at the time the tourism activities in
the south of Namibia were largely limited to hardcore travelers visiting
Sossusvlei 80 km north of Wolwedans (Dobson, Interview 2).
NamibRand Nature Reserve today
Today all 13 former livestock farms are rehabilitated into a single continuous
natural habitat. The Reserve extends over an area of 172 200 ha and shares a
100 km border with the Namib-Naukluft Park in the west while the imposing
Nubib Mountains forms a natural border on east. All fences between the
individual farms and the Namib-Naukluft Park have been removed to facilitate
the seasonal migratory wildlife movement and protect the unique biodiversity of
the Pro-Namib; the desert frontier where the Namib Desert meets mountainous
outcrops before reaching the escarpment of the central plateau of Namibia.
Nearly all facets of the Namib Desert are present on the Reserve – sand and
gravel plains and stretches of savanna punctuated with mountain ranges and
vegetated dune belts (NamibRand Nature Reserve, 2007). The Reserve has more
than 15% of its total area set aside as wilderness, which the constitution of the
Reserve stipulates will remain completely untouched.
The Reserve is a non-profit private nature reserve managed by the NRNR seven-
member board on which both the founding father of the Reserve, Albi Brückner
and his son Stephan Brückner who started Wolwedans, serve. All landowners are
members of the Reserve, have signed agreements, and have adopted a
constitution. The constitution sets the land aside for conservation – now and in
the future.
The Reserve is financially sustained through five tourism concessions. In the
past, funds where acquired in two ways. Firstly, a percentage of each concession
holder’s turnover constituted the main income of the Reserve. Secondly,
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 40
additional income was generated through the odd trophy-hunting excursion. As
of seven years ago, the NRNR board of directors adopted the current park fees
system; absolutely no hunting is allowed on the Reserve any longer and visitors
are charged a daily, per bed fee of R175. These funds are channeled directly into
conservation related activities on the Reserve. This approach stems from a
shared vision of the Reserve’s board coupled with an understanding of the
importance of conserving the land. The result is that none of the members seek
financial returns on their investments, allowing all funds to be invested for the
development and strengthening of the Reserve. In-turn the value of the land
increases to the benefit of the landowners (Odendal, Interview 3)
Concessionaires
The Wolwedans Collection in the heart of the Reserve is operated by NamibRand
Safaris (Pty) Ltd and accounts for the vast majority of the Reserve’s income at an
average of 60-65%. The Sossusvlei Desert Lodge in the far north of the Reserve
(previously known as the Sossusvlei Mountain Lodge) is operated by
Conservation Corporation Africa and generates around 25-30% of the total park
fees per annum. It accommodates guests in rooms of extreme luxury and targets
tourists exploring the gaint dunes at Sossusvlei. The rest of the Reserve’s income
is attributed to Namib Sky Adventures which provides hot-air balloon flights over
the desert plains, Tok Tokkie Trails which offers guided hikes in the dunes and
mountains of the Reserve and the NamibRand Family Hideout which provides
self-catering accommodation for up to 10 people. The Reserve charges a
discounted group fee for visitors to the Family Hideout in an bid to make it more
affordable to primarily targeted local families and regional visitors as a budget
option in contrast with the very exclusive high-end products offered by the other
concession holders (Odendal, Interview 3).
Aims
The Reserve aims:
- First and foremost to conserve and protect the fragile environment and
it’s rich biodiversity for the benefit of future generations.
- To establish and maintain a healthy and functioning ecosystem, providing
a sanctuary for fauna and flora
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 41
- To facilitate seasonal wildlife migratory routes in partnership with
neighbouring farms.
- To promote sustainable utilization of resources through a variety of
products and projects. Currently these include high-quality, low-impact
tourism products; the capture and sale of live game, environmental
education, various research projects, and the development of a
horticultural project to grow indigenous medicinal plants for commercial
production.
- To ensure continuance and financial independence by maintaining
commercial viability (NamibRand Nature Reserve, 2010).
Resource management and special projects
In order to conserve the Pro-Namib desert effectively the Reserve maintains a
conservation policy of minimal interference in conjunction with constant
monitoring. This is implemented through a comprehensive Environmental
Management Plan. It contains, amongst others, the following subsections:
- A Zoning Agreement
o It identifies areas as primitive zones (areas of significant
importance such as Bushmen’s Hill where various hunting artifacts
have been found) and general zone. The zoning further sets aside
areas for wilderness, buffer zones and various levels of activity and
allowable future infrastructure development (NamibRand Nature
Reserve, 2008b).
- An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
o An EIA is mandatory for all parties operating on the Reserve prior
to embarking on any infrastructure development or influential
changes to existing infrastructure (NamibRand Nature Reserve,
2007).
- A Tourism Development Plan
o It sets out a long-term vision for sustainable tourism development
on the Reserve (NamibRand Nature Reserve, 2008a).
- Traversal rights of landowners and concessionaires.
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 42
The Environmental Management Plan and other Reserve related policies and
regulatory concerns are all captured within the Reserve’s constitution, a tri-party
agreement between the NRNR, landowners, and concessionaires. This tri-party
approach to managing both the Reserve’s operations and development and that
of the concessionaires create difficult dynamics when it comes to new
developments.
One recent example illustrating this difficulty is the picnic site Wolwedans
wanted to erect. While all necessary plans were complete and the project had
passed the EIA successfully, the specific landowner still decided to veto the
development. Reasons provided were that it was too close to a primitive zoned
hill, while Wolwedans countered that the picnic site would be visible for miles if
constructed in the general zone in the middle of the plain. This has prompted a
recent paper by Stephan Brückner entitled “Time for a new deal.” It calls for a
way forward for the next 20 years as the founding members of the Reserve will
not be involved to provide guidance for much longer. The paper in summary calls
for:
- Less micromanagement of each landowner.
o The current policy is too restrictive. Any landowner can block any
development on the entirety of the Reserve. Stephan’s paper
advocates a measure of autonomy for each landowner limited by
what is reasonable.
- Clarification and development of the existing common vision. (Brückner,
Interview 1).
The possible expansion of the Reserve with another 30 000 ha will introduce
more landowners into the Reserve, potentially further complicating management
of the Reserve. As the Reserve’s primary goal is conservation, the Reserve has to
strike a difficult balance between conservation and financial concerns. It is with
this in mind that the NRNR board of directors are creating the long term Tourism
Development Plan as part of the Environmental Management Plan mentioned
above (NamibRand Nature Reserve, 2008a). Possibly the most striking self-
imposed rules set by the reserve are:
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 43
- Maximum 1 bed per 1 000 ha, totaling 172 beds for the whole reserve.
- Maximum 20 beds per site. This is in line with the more resilient very
high-end tourism market target (in general) and the exclusivity of the
products that the board aims to provide on the Reserve.
- Additionally landowners can traverse the whole reserve, while normal
concessionaires may only traverse their allotted areas. (Certain
concessionaires are also landowners, such as Namib Rand Safaris (Pty)
Ltd which operates Wolwedans whilst others are merely concessionaires)
(NamibRand Nature Reserve, 2007).
Moreover, the NRNR board is in strong support of large landscape co-operative
management approaches in the interest of advancing the reach of conservation
programmes and opening up fences for wildlife movement. For this reason a
partnership with Wilderness Safaris has been struck to open fences for wildlife
movement (not including commercial tourism related land traversal). Livestock
management outreach projects focusing, for example on the management of
predators, are also undertaken on neighbouring properties. Negotiations with
neighbouring landowners have been ongoing for many years and there is hope
that the younger generation will be more open to joining the Reserve. The main
grievance of current neighbouring landowners is the no-hunting restriction of
the Reserve (Dobson, Interview 5).
The relationship between the Reserve, landowners of the Reserve, and
concessionaires, however, is a symbiotic one. For example, the concessionaires
help to discourage poaching by reporting any suspicious events and guides
continuously report game sightings and help with game counts. This impacts on
the average operational cost of the Reserve’s which is less than N$10 per
hectare, lower than the expected minimum of N$15 found generally across
Namibia (Odendal, Interview 3).
The NamibRand Conservation Foundation (NRCF) was set up as a separate non-
profit organization to raise funds for special projects through creative initiatives
such as the Adopt-a-Fairy-Circle Project. Currently the two main beneficiaries of
these funds are the Namib Desert Environmental Education Trust (NaDEET) and
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 44
the Namib Desert Research and Awareness Centre (NRAC) each receiving 30% of
all raised funds and both are hosted on the Reserve itself.
The NaDEET Centre provides a unique hands-on experiential and environmental
education programme. It aims to empower Namibian youth and educators to
make decisions for a sustainable future. The Centre is dedicated to building
capacity within the environmental education sector to engage in education,
advocacy and awareness of the critical role of sustainable living.
The NRAC is a recent addition to the Reserve and seeks to support local, regional
and international research by providing accommodation and other facilities to
visiting researchers, and assisting with funding focused on environmental
management issues. The Centre has established partnerships with various local
and international research institutions. It also collaborates with the Ministry of
Environment and Tourism to feed back into national research. The Awareness
centre is currently under development and will target decision and policy
makers to highlight the importance of conservation and the sustainable
utilization of natural resources (NamibRand Nature Reserve, 2010).
2. Wolwedans Collection
History
Wolwedans, or the Wolwedans Collection as it is now officially referred too, is
operated by NamibRand Safaris (Pty) Ltd. Born out of the original NamibRand
Nature Reserve concept of Albi Brückner, the Wolwedans tourism venture was
started by his son Stephan Brückner. Stephan was only 13 years old when this
father bought the first farm in the area. Growing up in Windhoek, he had ample
time to visit the farm and camp on the dunes. Later Stephan went to Berlin to
study economics and completed his Masters in Business Communications in the
early eighties. Upon his return his father gave him the opportunity to develop a
tourism-based business on their farm named Wolwedans. And so the story began
(NamibRand Nature Reserve, 2007).
What was initially only a rudimentary site for those visitors with a real spirit of
adventure and a willingness to camp out in the wild, evolved into the first tented
camp being built in the early nineties. Aptly named Dune Camp, it caters for a
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 45
maximum of 12 guests and is situated on a 250-meter high dune about 3 km
from the old Wolwedans farmhouse. Guests arrived at the farmhouse and were
driven up to the lodge (Dobson, Interview 5).
The nearest accessible water was extracted from a borehole at the farmhouse.
Another borehole was later sunk next to the first and as all windmills were
removed due to their negative visual impact an electric pump was installed.
Electricity is provided by a diesel generator at the farmhouse and currently runs
for a few hours in the morning and afternoon. The electricity generated is used
for the camps, to run the laundry facility, the power tools of the carpentry
department and the mechanic’s workshop that services and maintains their 16-
vehicle fleet. A massive set of 90 batteries and inverters were installed in the late
nineties to power the then already extended farmhouse, office and staff
accommodation. This area is now referred to as the Wolwedans Village. Since
southern Namibia is very sparsely populated, it was never planned for the
national power grid to extend beyond the small towns in the area. Of these,
Maltehöhe is closest at 160km or just over 2 hours drive from Wolwedans.
Therefore the facilities evolved in such a way that the generator only powers the
farmhouse, while all campsites run on solar power for lighting, while gas is used
for cooking and refrigeration. There are no power plugs at the camp sites, but the
staff do not mind charging camera batteries, etc at the Wolwedans Village.
Product offering
The Wolwedans Collection now consists of five small and elegant safari camps in
the heart of NamibRand Nature Reserve and caters for a total of 46 guests with
different expectations and preferred levels of comfort. Firstly, the intimate Dune
Camp positioned on top of a 250-meter high dune caters for a maximum of 14
guests. Secondly, Dune Lodge, the biggest camp, makes provision for 20 guests in
chalets and boasts a wine cellar, library, two dining halls and a swimming pool
all located on top of a dune plateau that provides breathtaking panoramic vistas
of the desert. Thirdly, an add-on to the Dune Lodge is the Mountain View Suite
that has additional living space for those looking to stay over for several days
and who seek private seclusion while having access to all the comforts of the
Lodge. Mountain View Suite can operate completely independently with its own
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 46
private chef and guide. Fourth, the Wolwedans Private Camp is situated in a quiet
secluded valley catering for four guests exclusively and provides complete
privacy and solitude while lastly but not least, Aandster Boulders Camp, some
40km south of Wolwedans Village, is nestled between massive granite boulders
and sleeps a maximum of eight guests in four spacious tents. All camps are
constructed from wood and canvas and can theoretically be removed without
leaving any trace behind. Dune Lodge is the only camp that has a concrete
structure underneath the swimming pool. After a major fire destroyed the main
building in 2003, the pool was constructed with a massive pump underneath to
double as a fire service. The camps run purely on solar energy, except for the gas
stoves and a few gas fridges. These are currently being replaced with solar
fridges (NamibRand Safaris, 2010).
Wolwedans promises neither five-star luxury nor nouvelle cuisine. They shy
away from “pretense and wannabe fanciness.” (NamibRand Safaris, 2010). Their
passion lies in providing a true desert experience without unnecessary creature
comforts such as air-conditioned rooms, hairdryers and sliding glass doors to
keeping nature at a safe distance. They invite guests to enjoy a fuller experience
of the grandeur and beauty of a totally unspoiled desert. This down-to-earth, yet
rather civilized experience only adds to the sense of place one experiences in this
desert landscape. “It is here, in this land of stretching blue skies and endless
plains, that you will find beauty to feed the soul, tranquility to clear your mind
and space for your imagination to fly.” (NamibRand Safaris, 2010).
Guests are free to choose how they would like to spend their time. Wolwedans’s
core attraction is the magnificent unspoiled desertscapes rather than pure game
viewing, thus scenic drives can be undertaken at any time of the day while
sundowners on one of the dunes overlooking the vast desert planes is never
missed. A full day safari with picnic lunch en-route allows for the best game
viewing opportunities while candlelight dinners around one large family size
dining table provides for enticing conversations. Other activities not directly
provided by Wolwedans are hot air balloon flights, afternoon scenic flights to
Sossusvlei and the Diamond coast or guided walks with resident field guides.
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 47
Wolwedans is reachable by normal saloon car and is situated 80 km south of
Sesriem/Sossusvlei. Driving time from Windhoek, Swakopmund, Fish-river
canyon or Lüderitz is about 6 hours, while flying in only takes an hour
(NamibRand Safaris, 2010).
Wolwedans Village
One of the unique features of Wolwedans’s operation is the Wolwedans Village,
the base from which the whole portfolio of camps is run and home to 75
employees and students on average. Guests arrive either by car or make use of
the landing strip right on the doorstep of the Village. Here guests are heartily
welcomed with a smile by their assigned guide and every other staff member
whom they may happen to pass. After guests have signed in and begun to relax
over a chilled beverage, their guide provides a short brief on what they can
expect from their stay. Guests are then taken to the specific camp they have
booked on one of the open Land-Rovers. Guests will only return to the Village at
the end of their visit or if they book a scenic flight.
All guides and other personnel stay at the Village while only the camp manager,
chef and required waiters stay at the camps. This is in order to minimize the
impact and infrastructure development required at the camps. The bulk of the
food preparation is made at the main kitchen in the Village and transported to
the camps for lunch and dinner. The onsite chef simply finalizes the meal by
preparing the meat. The Village further hosts a variety of other facilities. These
include: the site office; a mechanic workshop to service and maintain the vehicle
fleet; a full carpentry workshop for the refurbishment of camps; new camps
construction and Village expansions; a large laundry for the whole 46 bed guest
operation; a waste water recycling plant; a greenhouse vegetable garden and
orchid called Eden and accommodation for the full staff compliment of
Wolwedans.
The Village consists of permanent structures. Stephan’s vision is that each
employee should have their own room, but as it stands at most two staff
members share, while senior management onsite each have their own rooms.
This however is the exception to the rule. The general practice is equal treatment
for all. Everyone eats breakfast, lunch and dinner together in the open communal
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 48
area and no one receives any preferential treatment “even the boss joins the
queue and eats out of the same pot” (Dobson, Interview 5). Very seldom will
Stephan or the any of the two senior managers on site have their meals at any of
the camps.
This unique setup, where guest accommodation is scattered over a few sites,
while the majority of the staff stays at a central location, has created a small
community. Now aptly named Wolwedans Village, it has had important
consequences for the whole Wolwedans operation. From a financial perspective
the scattered guest accommodation increased the cost of the operation
dramatically, while this is somewhat negated by a centralized base of operation.
More interestingly however, are the following consequences:
- The village is growing as more staff and students are periodically posted
there. With economy of scale sufficient capacity for the installation of a
wastewater management system has been created. This has been
implemented successfully. The processed water is currently clean enough
to be reused for stem-based plants in one of the greenhouse orchids. The
possibility of producing biogas as part of the wastewater system is now
also being investigated.
- Staff have their own area, well removed from guests, which is more
relaxing for them. Consequently they are generally happier which in
return enhances visitors’ experience.
- As Wolwedans is quite remote, the staff stay at the Village for 6 weeks at a
time. In addition, a very diverse group of Namibians are brought together.
The staff are from various ethnic groups and levels of literacy, experience
and language skills. This has resulted in a unique and dynamic social
structure that cannot be ignored and has to be proactively managed by
the Wolwedans management team. In lieu hereof, local social
development and community upliftment projects and ideas have always
been part of the Wolwedans operation. (Webber, Interview 7)
Logistics and budgeting
Managing the complicated logistics of the operation has been a major hurdle
from the beginning and remains today as the operation continues to grow.
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 49
Ninety percent of all foodstuffs are procured in Windhoek and transported by
road to Wolwedans, this includes fresh produce and all meat consumed. A fine
balance between the frequency of deliveries and selection of foodstuffs were
required to minimize transportation costs verses food wastage. Furthermore as
only the bare essential infrastructure have been put in place their still remains
allot of manual work. In order to overcome this hurdle strategic planning,
projections and good budgeting play a significant role (Nel, Interview 9).
Budgeting have been evolved to such an extent that occupancy forecasts on 10
000 bed nights usually only out by 50 bed nights, an accuracy level of 99.5%.
Budgeting takes into consideration a vast array of influences and trends that
include: price increases, seasonality, past occupancy activity, various economic
and political factors for both local, regional and European markets, exchange rate
fluctuations, and any other large events such as the World Cup which saw visitor
numbers dwindle (Nel, Interview 9).
This is in line with the very high-end clientele they target whom are less affected
by small market changes as many in the tourism industry, while the impact of big
events are more easily predicted.
Monthly management reports consists of financial indicators only and
everything is benchmarked against forecasted values, from here informed
strategic decision making takes place and budgets are fine-tuned continually to
reflect the current state of all factors (Brückner, Interview 1).
Management structure
Wolwedans has a strong patriarchal system with Stephan Brückner, described by
all as a visionary leader, at the helm. For many years only one senior manager at
the Village and line managers that lead the various departments such as head
chef, head mechanic, camp manager, etc supported Stephan. Thus, his hands-on
approach extended to every aspect of the operation. Over the last few years the
senior management team has grown to five, each running a separate
department: Finance, Human Resource Management, Quality Control and
Hospitality on site, Operations Manager on site and Stephan as Managing
Director (Dobson, Interview 2).
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 50
Both the finance and human resources departments are utilized to some extent
in other indirectly related business ventures of the Brückner family. These
include NICE, the chef school and restaurant in Windhoek; Nature Friends Safari,
a tour consultancy company; and the Swakopmund Guest House (Nel, Interview
9).
Beyond their normal capacity, nearly all the managers are in some way involved
in other Wolwedans projects. Gerald, initially appointed as Operations Manager
at Wolwedans, currently manages all the HR related functions as well as all the
administration of the Desert Academy. Similarly, Eddy and Theo who are on site
spend much of their time on documenting all facets of Wolwedans into manuals
that will eventually result in three guiding documents called The Wolwedans
Way (Brückner, Interview 4).
Leadership and culture
“… Mr. Boss is a big man, but wears the same clothes.” (Informal staff interviews)
Stephan’s leadership style can be described as pragmatic and driven by an
honest passion for what he believes Wolwedans should stand for. This has
unwittingly led to a very patriarchal system where Stephan is truly a nucleus
around whom Wolwedans revolves and without whom the organization would
suffer. Having recognized this as a risk to the sustainability and future of
Wolwedans the whole management team is now involved in documenting all
facets of Wolwedans in an attempt to minimize the impact “if something happens
to any of the senior management team” (Dobson, Interview 2).
Stephan’s approach may however be the single biggest contributor to what
Wolwedans represents today. A few characteristics stand out as having a
profound effect on the staff and overall culture:
- Visionary strategic thinking
- Hands-on and involved
- Empowerment and autonomy
- Value based and purpose driven
- Commitment to take action
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 51
Hands-on and involved
Stephan is extremely hands-on and was even more so in the past. His efforts at
restraint in the area of micromanagement have proven difficult. His drive to
make decisions regarding the finer details stems from the belief that Wolwedans
is the kind of product that requires a hands-on approach with attention to detail.
This is not with respect to the day-to-day running, but rather everything that
defines or shapes the product and largely everything that is visible to guests. For
example, all soft furnishings such as linen, cutlery, crockery, interior design,
furniture selection, architecture and construction work require attention to
detail (King, Interview 6). It is executed so particularly that one does not notice
until it is pointed out when it becomes obvious. For example, the entire fleet of
vehicles is Land-Rovers as this is epitomizes the African safari for European
travelers. Despite the fact that Toyota LandCruisers would last longer in the
dunes, only one is used by the staff as a workhorse. Even though such decisions
are made fairly autocratically, everyone trusts Stephan’s creativity and sense of
style. This may be attributed to his willingness to hear suggestions from any
member of staff or management, especially those directly involved with
whatever is under discussion. He recognizes that it is vital to get full buy-in from
them as they will ultimately deal with it on a daily basis. The reasons for his
engagement with staff about the purpose of every action is, according to Stephan
himself, to cultivate in them a sense of his own ethic, so that they “start[s] to read
me and know what I’d want and think the way I think” (Brückner, Interview 4).
“I could never say something is not my job, I should say it more often, but if it’s
got to be done, it’s got to be done!” (Brückner, Interview 4). This willingness to
get his hands dirty and take part in any aspect of the business makes Stephan
popular and highly respected by the staff. One of the staff members tried to
explain it to me: “We like telling some of the guests after dinner that they were
eating with the boss just now. They are always very surprised! They say they
thought he was maybe a manager or something, can’t believe he’s the owner;
what a nice guy! You understand, Mr. Boss is a big man, but wears the same
clothes.” (Informal staff interviews). This type of equal treatment where top
management doesn’t want to be treated differently from everyone else and
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 52
where everyone is treated with equal respect regardless of status within the
organization has resulted in a very inviting culture.
Stephan furthermore spends about 30% of his time onsite, traveling down about
three times a month. These trips vary in length from one day to a week at a time
and are usually scheduled during the week, but sometimes include weekends.
When on site Stephan does become not involved in day-to-day running, focusing
instead on building activities and other longer-term issues. This affords him the
opportunity to stay in touch by interacting with the staff and engaging with their
concerns (Brückner, Interview 1).
Empowerment and autonomy
The idea that empowerment is a strong incentive and personal motivator, is
advocated by Stephan. This premise underlies his leadership style and is
supported by the resultant culture of the organization. The positive effect of
empowerment becomes especially evident on the level of line managers. They
have free reign to manage their department as they see fit and no formal
monitoring is in place. Staff are encouraged to take initiative and take on more
responsibility themselves. For example, when the head chef changes the menu,
the next time Stephan visits Wolwedans they will invite him to have dinner at
one of the camps so that can they can present the new item for approval. One of
the cultural treats for guests is the reading of the menu in the Nama-click
language, but if the staff do not feel like doing it they are not obliged to. In
essence, it is more important for guests to have a genuine and honest interaction
with the staff than merely to have a repetitive list of activities performed
(Webber, Interview 7).
A further example of the extent of autonomy given to staff is that it is very
seldom that either of the two senior managers at Wolwedans is directly involved
with guests. Staff are entrusted with looking after the guests themselves. Guides
meet, greet and generally see to it that guests enjoy their stay, while the camp
manager who doubles-up as a waiter or chef takes care of guests while they are
at the camps. The staff are empowered to the extent that they run the camps
entirely unsupervised, which cultivates confidence and a sense of pride for being
trusted with so much responsibility. Stephan believes this confidence results in a
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 53
more authentic and open interaction between guests and staff, adding to the
magic that is Wolwedans (Shongu, Interview 8).
An employee handbook is used to articulate the culture of Wolwedans. It clearly
explains protocol and provides reasoning to enable employees to have an
understanding of the bigger picture. It is aimed at encouraging employees to
make autonomous decisions that are in line with the values of Wolwedans. This
policy of backing every decision with good reasoning stems from Stephan’s
strategic long-term thinking approach (Dobson, Interview 5). It is visible in every
aspect of the business.
Any employee related issues, including management issues, are dealt with
according to the same strict code of conduct and disciplinary procedures. Such
issues are handled discretely, as everyone deserves equal treatment and as a
matter of mutual respect. A clear explanation and reason are always provided
here as well so that staff can learn to interpret what works well and what not. In
the process staff are able to operate more autonomously still and with less
monitoring. When management notices any specified tasks not completed, there
remains a strong focus on the underlining causal. Asking and explaining “why” is
commonplace: “Why haven’t you done this? This is why we do it this way
(Shongu, Interview 8).
The culture has been described as one where you first think, then do and ask
forgiveness later (Dobson, Interview 5). This however does not extend to all
parts of the operation. There are certain kinds of actions that require prior
consent from Stephan and this is made very clear. These include anything that
would impact the environment or the core product offered as mentioned above.
For example, any type of construction work, even if within the confines of the
Village, has to be sanctioned by Stephan first (Brückner, Interview 4).
Value based and purpose driven
An important part of the Wolwedans philosophy is to take good care of
employees as they are in direct contact with guests; they are crucial to the
success of the entire operation (Brückner, 2000). In order to beat off “desert
fatigue” staff members usually don’t stay on site for longer than six weeks at a
time and while various educational programmes have been provided for the
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 54
development of staff, few have yielded large-scale success. Many staff members
would rather sit down with a beer after work, chat a bit and go to bed than spend
time advancing their careers. Even the option to have their own sundowners on
the dunes after a hard day’s work dwindled after only three days (Webber,
Interview 7).
In an attempt to affect real change in the behavioral patterns of staff at the
Village the current communal areas are being expanded to include more sport
and recreational facilities, such as a soccer, netball and volleyball field, a gym and
a cinema. Sport has been identified as a power tool to change perceptions and
motivate staff towards developing personal goals and working towards
achieving those goals. For example the desire to win the next soccer match will
inspire players to practice harder and come up with strategies to beat the other
team. Not only may this influence their willingness to develop their own
marketable skills, but also have positive spin-offs for Wolwedans. Practicing
sports means fit, motivated, and happy staff, which also means more productive,
efficient and innovative employees better able to take initiative ensuring that
Wolwedans remains a top tourist destination. Soccer has already shown positive
results after a few informal matches against other lodges in the region have been
arranged. The aim now is now to make it more professional and start a proper
local soccer league (Dobson, Interview 5).
Stephan is passionate about developing Namibian talent and derives satisfaction
from helping employees lift their own SME projects of the ground. His passion
and drive towards something bigger than just another tourist destination, a real
sense of purpose can be seen in the way he leads and inspires everyone within
the business. Shortly after the turn of the century the staff compliment at
Wolwedans tripled and the business showed tremendous growth. Stephan felt
the need for guidance and a better sense of the way forward at Wolwedans. He
drafted the strong and very compelling Vision, Mission and Value statements of
Wolwedans. It includes a set of goals very similar to the four cornerstones of
Sustainable Development as captured so elegantly in the 4Cs of the Zeitz
foundation. Both the Vision and Mission statements are captured in the
employee handbook. It also forms part of the two-hour discussion with Stephan
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 55
directly that each new employee has as part of the brief induction process for
new employees.
The extent to which Wolwedans is value based and purpose driven can further
be illustrated by the following: Stephan views Wolwedans as a finite project in
terms of infrastructure development. The constitution only allows for 60 more
beds at which point the total capacity for infrastructure development will have
been reached (For more detail see section: The Future below). It is intended that,
at this point, the focus will shift from mere discussion of the vision and mission
statement to integrating it to all activities as an ongoing process. The vision and
mission statements should be explored in regular staff workshops to increase
staff awareness, understanding, and support of Wolwedans values. As Stephan
points out: “There is a big difference between reading the mission statement
versus hearing someone talk about it and explain why certain things are so
important to us! Especially if it come from the horse’s mouth!” (Brückner,
Interview 4). The philosophy is that everyone should understand the purpose
and goals of the organization so that “everyone pulls on the same strings.”
(Brückner, Interview 4).
Commitment to take action
Often quoted, Richard Branson has always been a believer in taking action as the
title of one of his books so aptly states: ‘Screw it, just do it!’ As a pragmatic leader
Stephan also recognizes and appreciates this call to action in other leaders such a
Jochen Zeitz the founder of Puma shoes and the Zeitz foundation (Brückner,
Interview 4). Without the will try something even before it has been either
proven, perfectly preplanned or analysed for every possible outcome,
Wolwedans would not be what it is today. Wolwedans is now three years ahead
of everyone else in Namibia when it comes to the vocational training course they
piloted 3 years ago. As Stephan states: “Even though [the first three years have]
not been perfect [...], the fact is that we are three years ahead of everybody else;
and it will be good. We’ll make sure of it!” (Brückner, Interview 10). Knowing
that the vocational training programme, if done properly, would have win-win
benefits, not only for Wolwedans, but also for the students of the training
themselves, as well as the Namibian tourism industry as a whole, was enough
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 56
reason for Stephan to give the green light for the project. Wolwedans is
committed to the success of the programme; even though they could never have
anticipated how much vested time it would demand. The vocational training, in
part, has also lead to Wolwedans being considered as one of the nine sites
around the world earmarked to lead the GER certification’s development, which
will no doubt lead to other possibilities (Brückner, Interview 4).
As one of the senior managers lamented, “His policy is sort of jump in and then
learn to swim! It’s a bit scary, but it works!” (Dobson, Interview 5)
Creative projects and activities
Initially Wolwedans only employed people from the local district in an effort
support the development of the local region. Thus, most of the employees came
from the closest town, Maltehöhe, some 150 km east of Wolwedans. For most
employees the quality of life they were able to enjoy at Wolwedans surpassed
that of their home environment. Most of the men sent their money back to their
families in Maltehöhe so Wolwedans procured a property there with to develop a
centre where the wives of the men working on Wolwedans could raise their
children safely. The plan was to run a bed-and-breakfast venture, a small home-
baked produce shop, and a laundry facility for the laundry requirements of
Wolwedans. The venture would provide much needed employment for local
woman, while an onsite teacher would educate their children. However, the
project died due to overly complicated social services concerns. Lately the idea
has been revived as Wolwedans has grown significantly and the outsourcing of
all the laundry to Maltehöhe has become economically viable on its own. This
option is now seriously being considered, and would have as massive impact on
the energy and water usage at Wolwedans (Webber, Interview 7).
Eden, the greenhouse vegetable garden and orchid was developed over the last
few years at the passionate hands of one of the staff members. Eden provides
fresh produce for the Wolwedans operation and indigenous trees are also being
planted in the orchid to eventually replace some of the alien trees in the desert,
in line with NRNR’s desert rehabilitation objectives. A wastewater treatment
system for the Village has been built for reuse in the vegetable garden. Although
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 57
this project has not yet yielded the full extent of the desired results as the
standard of water quality is not as high as anticipated, the water an be used for
stem-based plants in the orchid. The plan still remains to raise the quality of the
water so that it can be used for the entire greenhouse garden.
The Namibian Institute of Culinary Education (NICE) is a restaurant and training
school for chefs in the centre of Windhoek. Started in 2004, it has been an
extremely successful venture in its own right however, running a restaurant in
Windhoek was not the initial reason for its development. NICE originated as a
novel solution to a set of seemingly unrelated circumstances. Firstly, the
property used to be the Brückner family home, but the upkeep had become too
tedious as the younger generation moved out. Hence, the Brückner family owned
a large property with a central location that could be better utilized. Secondly,
Wolwedans suffered from a chronic shortness of chefs as most lodges in the
more remote areas do. Chefs would rather work for lower salaries closer to
family and friends. Thirdly, Stephan knew a suitable chef who could use the
opportunity of training new chefs to allow him to stay in Namibia. Lastly, his
entrepreneurial spirit and passion for the development of SME’s meant that
Stephan was eager to take on the challenge. Starting a chef training school and
restaurant would be an opportunity to solve the chef shortage at Wolwedans,
better utilize the property in Windhoek and invest in the country’s social capital.
The consequence of making Namibia a better place to live in and travel to by
boosting the tourism industry as a whole is the positive impact on Wolwedans
and the Brückner family’s other ventures. The tendency to consider the bigger
picture and think holistically in this way is the cornerstone of the success of
Wolwedans in terms of sustainable development (Brückner, Interview 4).
The first mention of the Wolwedans Foundation concept was in the Vision,
Mission and Value document Stephan produced just after the turn of the century
(Brückner, 2000). Therein Wolwedans commits a third of their earnings to the
Foundation to employ the funds for social development and upliftment projects
such as accredited training programmes and sports activities. This is closely
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 58
related to the “community” arm of sustainable development, but with a very
significantly albeit only slightly different interpretation.
As discussed in the literary study, the notion of community refers to the benefit
for local communities derived from sustainable development ventures. The
Wolwedans team has only recently become aware of the theoretic concepts of
sustainable development via their contact with the Zeitz Foundation. Their views
in this regard have largely been based on their own “gut feel and [what] they
thought was the right thing to do.” (Brückner, Interview 1). The unique
perspective of the Wolwedans team regarding community, originated in the
support of the nearest small community, Maltehöhe. In their view this was a way
of supporting their business, but on a bigger scale. In their recognition of the
win-win benefits of investing in one’s local community, the Wolwedans team was
well ahead of their time. From this humble logic that benefitting the local
community has positive results for their business the concept of providing
benefits to all Namibians and the desire to extend the benefits they can provide
to the whole of Namibia has evolved. Thus, by starting with their own authentic
understanding of the importance of community, the Wolwedans team have
developed and extended the concept of community to include the country as a
whole. This is part of their holistic understanding that benefiting the country and
the tourism industry as a whole also benefits Wolwedans which is in stark
contrast with the traditional misconception that it is counterproductive to
support the industry when this will also result in benefits for one’s competitors.
The southwestern region of Namibia has always been extremely sparsely
populated. There was no prior community or ethic group affected when the
initial livestock farms where introduced. No communities per say would be
negatively influenced by the development of the NRNR or have any claim
benefits from the establishment of the NRNR. However, as part of the
development of Wolwedans the Brückner family felt that they wanted to aid the
economic development of the southwestern region. For this reason they
employed residents from the town of Maltehöhe, which suffered from severe
unemployment and extreme poverty after the collapse of the farming industry in
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 59
the area. The employees required training and this was done along with other
projects in Maltehöhe that benefited the community (Dobson, Interview 5).
Today Wolwedans employs Namibians from all over the country, but the same
concept of developing and supporting their staff and their circumstances first,
remains. In addition, the Wolwedans Village, a micro cosmos of Namibia’s wider
population, witnesses many of the social ills and concerns which many
Namibians face today. Due to the isolated nature of the operation these issues,
which usually include personal and family related issues of staff members have
to be managed on a daily basis. This gives Wolwedans a unique environment
where social development and skills transfer projects can be explored.
In order to build a national tourism product, Namibia needs a qualified and
skilled workforce in the various fields of tourism. One of Namibia’s major
problems is that there is a lack of training facilities while the demand for skilled
resources far exceeds the supply of graduates from various vocational and
tertiary training institutions. The demand is further exacerbated by the severe
shortage of management staff and that the Namibian government actively
pursues substantive equality through BEE and would like to see more formerly
disadvantaged Namibians taking higher positions within the tourism industry.
Merging the widespread need for educated Namibians and the practical skills
and knowledge Wolwedans have to offer in a variety of trades within the tourism
industry has lead to various partnerships with education and governmental
institutions. Wolwedans annually provides opportunities for students seeking
internships and job attachments as part of their formal curriculum. The fields
receiving attention covers hospitality, nature conservation, carpentry (which
include plumbing and construction) and agriculture (as part of developing their
greenhouse garden) (Dobson, Interview 5).
The Wolwedans Foundation have already spent over N$1.5 million since 2007 on
developing the Wolwedans Desert Academy a hospitality training institution
where comprehensive theoretical and practical training is provided in
accordance with the syllabi compiled by the Namibian Training Authority (NTA)
and approved by the Namibian Qualifications Authority (NQA). The aim of the
training is not only to improve the service delivery of the tourism and hospitality
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 60
industry of Namibia, but also to improve the employment opportunities, job
security and income of the trainees. Thus far the Foundation covered all costs
and training was provided free of charge, however, as per the National Training
Authority request the quota of trainees will be increased to 45 per annum
starting 2011 and depending on the pending funding agreement between the
Wolwedans Foundation and the National Training Authority, tuition fees may
become a reality (Wolwedans Foundation, 2010).
Wolwedans also benefits from this arrangement, as they are able to assess how
the trainee tolerate the distance from their families and approach the top
candidates for positions at Wolwedans. Additionally some of the students,
especially those from the Polytechnic of Namibia have to write research reports
as part of their studies, which sometimes may reveal useful information for
improvements at Wolwedans (Dobson, Interview 5).
The future
Stephan plans to complete the Wolwedans Collection in the next five to six years
with the addition of two more camps, which would bring them to the 60-guest
limit they are entitled to by the NRNR constitution. Thereafter focus will shift to
marketing, fine-tuning, proactive maintenance and tying up loose ends
(Brückner, Interview 10).
Stephan remains committed to social development via the Wolwedans
Foundation. As Wolwedans has become a family institution, it will never be sold
or replicated elsewhere. This connection to a sense of ‘place’ for the Brückners
has been so from before the Wolwedans Collection realised. It played an
instrumental role in creating a culture at Wolwedans where primary
consideration is given to the NamibRand’s long-term protection. It has guided all
development plans. However ‘place’ does not refer solely to Wolwedans. It
includes the southern region, and Namibia as a whole. It is a philosophy where
all action is informed by a “Focus[...] on the long term; No quick fixes”, where you
believe you are an integral part of the whole and thus must play your part in
creating a country where one’s “kids would want to live in” (Brückner, Interview
10).
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 61
From Stephan’s point of view, education and SME development is not only an
integral part of the empowerment of all Namibians but is essential for the
meaningful and sustainable development of a country. The old “Giving someone
a fish feeds her once, but give someone a fishing rod feeds her for a lifetime”
comes to mind. An anecdote told by Stephan is more true to the desert landscape
of Wolwedans where trees are a true symbol of life: “Is it not better to stay the
guardian of a fruit tree – water and protect it for years and remain able to share
the fruits and use it to teach others to care for and plant their own tree from its
seeds than to give a part of the tree away, from which others will eat once before
chopping it down for firewood?” This is partly a reference to BEE which is
actively pursued by the Namibian government. The Wolwedans ethic has a much
more sustainable approach to the develop of Namibia as whole. The view is that
vocational training initiatives, the employment of over 200 people in the whole
of the NRNR project, and the simultaneous conservation and sustainable land
utilization all form an important part of the Wolwedans contribution to
sustainable development of a country with rich biodiversity, breathtaking beauty
and a diverse human population (Brückner, Interview 10).
In terms of NamibRand Nature Reserve, work will continue to extend the
protected desert frontiers through joint management initiatives and the
development of Large Landscape Management agreements aimed at free wildlife
movement and the sustainable utilization of the region as a whole. By means of a
joint venture with the Ministry of Environment and Tourism and other
stakeholders a project is underway to pilot regional conservation management
activities in five planed ‘pockets’ in southwestern Namibia (Odendal, Interview
3).
B. GER Certification
Many of the stated benefits and concerns regarding the efficacy of certification
schemes in general (see literature study above) in promoting or enforcing more
sustainable practices can also be ascribed to the GER certification of the Zeitz
foundation. However the adaptive, reiterative process of the certification process
holds promise while the self-developed preliminary E4C management approach
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 62
holds a variety of advantages for those applying for the GER certification. The
main benefits and some of the concerns of the certification and the E4C-plan are
discussed below. It must however be noted that the findings are largely based on
the perceptions of all the individuals involved as the certification is yet to prove
its worth.
1. Impact of the GER certification
Wolwedans caters largely for the international market with more than 90% of all
guests coming from Europe, the USA and the UK. There is a strong belief within
the Wolwedans management team in a growing trend, especially within the
developed world, towards a new kind of holiday planning. Tourists are more
inclined to book holidays through tour companies and to holiday destinations
that are engaged in responsible tourism, pursuing ethical and more sustainable
“green” practices (Brückner, Interview 1).
In light hereof the GER certification is seen as a strong marketing tool which will
yield positive results in the medium to long term future as more tourists become
selective about their chosen holiday destinations. It is expected that the Long
Run Destinations brand of Jorgun Zeitz the founder of both Puma shoes
worldwide and the Zeitz foundation will strengthen with time, affecting the
market. As the brand strengthens internationally through the marketing prowess
and experience Zeitz, the importance of GER certification is expected to grow
(Brückner, Interview 1).
Despite the fact that Wolwedans does have a highly marketable product, they
judge their marketing activities as lacking potency. Better communication of the
products on offer as well as the other activities they are involved in should have
a profound influence on the number of visitors. Wolwedans believes that
certification is the best way to prove claims of sustainability to potential guests.
Moving towards a more sustainable operation has high initial expenditure costs
associated with it, but in the long term the change should prove to be the most
economical choice. This is because it is believed that the value of refraining from
negatively affecting the environment will become more evident with time. It also
provides a sound business case for experimenting and spending more time on
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 63
sustainability projects, for example building a biogas plant as part of their waste
treatment facilities. The biogas concept has, since serious discussions with the
Zeitz foundation started in 2009, gained more momentum as the possibility to
partner with the Ministry of Mines for the development of such a system is
already being investigated. Such industry leading projects, if successful, would
provide further publicity, putting Wolwedans “in a whole different light” within
Namibia and the world (Dobson, Interview 2).
From Stephan’s point view the sustainable development cornerstones captured
as the 4Cs within the GER certification is fundamentally positive. Therefore, even
if the GER certification scheme fails internationally, its guidelines as well as the
E4C framework will still be implemented as part of the Wolwedans management
activities and the vision statement will be updated to reflect the 4Cs (Brückner,
Interview 4).
One of the difficulties with GER certification, and in fact any sustainability
certification scheme, is the interrelatedness between the 4Cs. As the Desert
Academy will feature as part of Community, it most probably feature as part of
Conservation and Commerce too. The resultant overlap between the concepts
may cause some confusion with regards to division and assignment of
responsibilities amongst management. Furthermore, GER certification may
require collaboration between the two or more entities as is the case with
Wolwedans and the NRNR. The NRNR carries a large part of the conservation
related responsibilities. This means that the NRNR will need to be willing to
apply the E4C-plan and recommendations from the Zeitz foundations in order
for Wolwedans to retain the certification. It may strain an already difficult
relationship between the various parties involved. Furthermore, it raises the
question of which entity should receive the certification. It also remains
uncertain and how strongly regulated the use of Wolwedans’s GER certification
status is. For example, could some of the other non-complaint concessionaires
use the mere fact that the NRNR is party involved in Wolwedans’s certification to
market themselves as more sustainable.
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 64
2. Impact of the E4C adaptive management approach
Zietz foundation
The adaptive nature of the E4C-plan is a strategic management approach. This is
beneficial for both the Zeitz foundation and Wolwedans. It allows the Zeitz
foundation to continuously develop and update the GER certification criteria. It
allows Wolwedans to utilize its content for internal and external communication
and to quantify, via a structured approach, the existing strategic thinking that
Stephan himself employs. It will, however, require considerable time, effort,
commitment and accountability from all involved to keep the document up to
date. At it’s most efficient the approach should be utilized not only for
sustainable development goals, but also other aspects such as hospitality quality-
control in the case of Wolwedans. This leads to a major concern that if the
adaptive management approach is not fully embraced the annual updating
required may become an overbearing administrative load that could in its
extremity result in non-compliance and ultimately the cancelation of the
certification or otherwise low adoption levels.
As sites are required to develop their own E4C-plans which the Zeitz foundation
would receive as soon as updates are made the Zeitz foundation is in a powerful
position to stay at the forefront of sustainable development practices as they are
able to update their certification criteria continuously. Furthermore this body of
knowledge will put the Zeitz foundation in the ideal position to study and tap
into the practical knowledge and creativity of many tourist driven enterprises in
order to gain a better understanding of and identify new and innovative ways in
which each of the 4C’s can be interpreted. It will also provide practical steps for
the various LRD sites to use to measure their own progress. If the GER
certification is widely adopted, the E4C-plans from the various sites could
become a valuable body of knowledge providing good resources for further
research within the sustainable development field. For example the analyses of
the plans will allow for the creation of new and better criteria for each of the 4Cs.
It will show the criteria that is common to all sites and those that are applicable
only to specific kinds of operations or environments. Each site must have
modifications made to the default certification indicators. This, coupled with the
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 65
subsequent set of E4C management plans allows the Zeitz foundation to marry
the theoretical concepts from academia with the real world practical
interpretation and application thereof. This will result in a very positive
breeding ground for active sustainable development research. Innovative new
strategies to manage and solve difficult sustainable development can be
identified and shared within the GER or even wider community leading better
sustainable development practices and initiatives worldwide.
It does however depend how widely the certification is adopted and respected
within the international community. In addition to the specific criteria employed
in determining the award of GER certification, the certification itself will have to
be tailored . will be susceptible to personal interpretation of the independent
assessors employed by the Zeitz foundation. This raises consistency concerns
within the assessment process that have not yet been dealt with. These complex
issues will have to be resolved before the validity of the GER certification scheme
can be guaranteed. This is even more so as the first nine E4C-plans will form part
of the development of the GER certification scheme. Therefore it is the first nine
E4C-plans that will largely determine the assessment criteria of the GER
certification.
Wolwedans
Wolwedans itself will benefit from the above approach, not only the Zeitz
foundation. Although Wolwedans already have a strong holistically driven
management approach, which emphasises strategic long-term thinking, they can
still benefit from developing the E4C-plan in a variety of ways. Wolwedans is
currently documenting all the aspects of their business. This will add to their
growing body of guiding documents that will make up “The Wolwedans Way”
and cement the founding principles on which the NRNR and WD are built. The
aim of these documents is two fold; One, to communicate to future generations
the wishes of the founding fathers and; two, to provide material that can be used
for internal and external communication to educate, inform, and motivate staff,
guests and the public at large to become more aware of the importance of the
various aspects of sustainable development. Similarly, the process of developing
the E4C-plan is as important as the final product as it requires of management to
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 66
clarify their thinking and develop clear objectives. Furthermore, the document
serve as a measurement tool for the progress of each of the 4Cs. If extended to
include other aspects of the business as well, it should allow management to
determine where aspects of the business are lacking attention more easily.
Currently water usage measurements are collected, but the raw data remains
untouched. It is not synthesised into user-friendly information. The hope is that
the E4C-plan will act as a guiding document for current decision making and
ensure that the various and sometimes scattered activities and loose ends such
as water measurements are properly managed and are in fact consulted in the
decision-making processes.
The Brückners have for some time realized the importance of protecting the
environment for future generations, but only recently that the organization they
created to facilitate the protection of the environment is just as important. As the
founders, part-owners and leaders of both the NRNR and Wolwedans they have
to plan for the future of both operations. In an attempt to ensure Wolwedans will
stand the test of time and continue to push the boundaries of sustainable
development practices, they are creating the “Wolwedans Way” which includes
not only the practical operational activities, but also captures the road ahead.
Thus, it includes their strategic short, medium, and long-term plans, values,
purpose, policies, and vision. Simultaneously, it needs to prevent future leaders
from making fundamental alterations to the essence of what the NRNR and
Wolwedans sets out to achieve. The E4C-plan is a well-structured model that can
be employed to effectively capture the direction forward and ensure that
management work strategically. It is a tool for the thorough development of
goals, as it requires of management to consider every aspect in terms of long,
medium, and short-term objectives and to identify areas that may require more
attention. Furthermore, it can be used to benchmark individual employees’
performance to ensure accountability.
As Stephan is the creative and strategic thinker for Wolwedans, the E4C-plan
provides a platform for the communication of his long-term strategies to the rest
of the management team and staff. Moreover with minimal manipulation of the
content it could be used on a variety of media for communication to employees
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 67
and management. It could form part of Stephan’s campaign to transmit
Wolwedans’s purpose to the entire organization so that everyone “pulls on the
same strings” and “move[s] in the same direction.” Stephan believes that
working towards achieving goals and instilling a goal-orientated mindset
amongst the staff will not only make them more efficient and motivated at work,
but will also change their personal perception of their own development and
empowerment. Achieving set goals that employees can be proud of develops
their self-confidence, which positively changes their own life and ultimately also
enhances the Wolwedans product.
The management plan may infringe and limit the freedom that the Wolwedans
team to find creative solutions. There may be certain overly restrictive criteria
set out in the plan, that do not allow for sudden changes. This may have a stifling
effect leading to a follower-culture where creative problem-solving and out-of-
the-box thinking is negatively impacted. In opposition to this the GER states that
it aims to promote innovation through creative problem-solving and
experimentation. Even if the GER does provide financial support for innovation
through experimentation, balance is still called for within the E4C-plan to avoid
overly restrictive objectives. In addition, the document must balance the need to
be comprehensive with the practicality of trying to maintain a sizable document.
Wolwedans perceives the preliminary E4C-plan as complex and in need of
“academic muscle”. As it is perceived to be a daunting and time consuming task,
the Wolwedans team have decided to make use of an external consultant for
forging the E4C plan. It is likely that other applicants feel the same, which may
oppose widespread adoption of the approach and of GER certification
applications. This would limit the positive impact of the certification on
ecosphere protection. Nevertheless, perhaps the need for an external consultant
may be attributed not to the inherently daunting nature of the construction of a
preliminary E4C-plan but to the size and complexity of the Wolwedans
operation. Perhaps the inaugural plan merely seems increasingly daunting for
this reason. Besides, once the preliminary plan has been drafted, keeping the
document updated should be more manageable. Applicants would nevertheless
benefit tremendously from support by the Zeitz foundation with the
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 68
development of the preliminary E4C-plans. As the process evolves LRD would
also gain the knowledge they perhaps feel they lack at the outset.
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 69
VI. RESEARCH CONCLUSIONS
As a summary to this case study the conclusion addresses the extent to which the
themes identified and explored as part of the analysis of Wolwedans as an
exemplary sustainable organisation can be integrated into the structure of the
E4C-Plan. The structure of the E4C-Plan, as explained in the literature study, sets
four aspirational goals at the top of the E4C pyramid. These articulate that the
impact on Conservation, Community, Culture, and Commerce must be
functioning ecosystems, sustainable livelihoods, cultural creativity and diversity,
and business resilience respectively. Each of the aspirational goals is supported
by a set of tangible outcomes that need to be identified as part of the E4C-Plan.
These have been depicted as a pyramid structure by the Zeitz foundation and in
the literary study. Therefore, each of the C’s, the overarching goal that the Zeits
foundation articulates under each of them and the extent to which Wolwedans
practices can be generalized to other sites will be discussed in turn. Thereafter,
the effect of the pyramid structure itself will be summarized in the same way.
1. Conservation
The goal or impact of conservation, as articulated by the Zeitz Foundation, is
healthy, functioning ecosystems and the sustainable utilization of natural
resources. Wolwedans is primarily focused on this aspect of the pyramid,
forming, largely, the modus operandi of the entire concept. Conservation has
always been the primary concern of the organization and the commercial aspect,
far from overshadowing this concern, has been clearly articulated as the means
to that end throughout. This is achieved through the structure of the
organization and the central nature of all decisions concerning conservation. It
also has important consequences for the sense of purpose experienced by staff
and guests alike and for the quality of the product itself.
With regards to the structure, the NamibRand is the over-arching entity. It’ sole
focus is conservation activities. On the other hand, the concessionaires are
responsible for securing commercial viability. The NRNR has veto power on all
decisions affecting conservation. There is a clear separation between these
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 70
entities. Traditionally these entities would simply act as opposing forces within
one entity. It may occasionally lead to strained relations but the overall benefit is
that it requires reasoned debate and a more valuable dialogue in that buy-in is
recognized as important for effective implementation. Conversely, it also means
that no justification needs to be given for the protection of fundamental
conservation principles. This is positive for the concessionaires as they are
better able to function as a coherent unit without internal strife as a result of
controversial decisions made in the interest of conservation.
With regards to the central nature of all decisions concerning conservation, there
is one person within the Wolwedans organization who enforces conservation
principles. The existence of a central autocratic authority for decisions that have
a fundamental impact on conservation, has proved beneficial to Wolwedans. This
is so even in an organization managed much more openly when it comes to all
other aspects of the business.
With regards to the quality of the product, the fact that conservation is primary,
means that the main commodity that Wolwedans offers, i.e. nature and scenic
beauty, is kept in a pristine state. The effect is that the guests experience Africa
much as it has been for hundreds of years. This will be further discussed under
commerce. The beneficial effect of the focus on conservation for a sense of
purpose experienced by guests and staff alike will be discussed below with
regard to the sense that a ‘movement’ is created. Ultimately there are various
positive spin-offs to identifying that the primary commodity on offer is an
unspoilt landscape and keeping that landscape in a pristine state.
Therefore, considering the practices of Wolwedans and the NRNR already
discussed, it can be deduced that such practices are transferable to other sites
and that implementing such practices has positive spin-offs, not only for the
product offered, but also for the efficacy of staff. These practices include having 1
bed per 1 000 ha; having a 20 pax limit per site; the exclusive use of solar power
at all sites, growing one’s own produce, using a waste water system and
innovative practices such as the use of Biogas. Furthermore, holistic approaches
such as being engaged in large co-management and development efforts within
the surrounding area to effect joint conservation plans such as the Protected
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 71
Areas Association of Namibia (PAN) and the Greater Sossusvlei-Namib Complex
(GSNC) are exemplary for any site striving for the goal of conservation (Odendal,
Shaw, Scott, & Scott, 2010).
Futhermore, it can be deduced that a central authority within each
concessionaire and the separation of entities involved is beneficial in an
organization aimed at the preservation of ecosystems and the ecosphere at large.
2. Commerce
Financial Viability and responsible business practices are the main concerns of
the commercial aspect of the E4C-plan for GER certification. The approach to
commerce of Wolwedans can be epitomized by the ‘high-quality, low-impact’
eco-tourism venture it so often is described as in its marketing efforts. This
immediately links the commercial aspect of the organisation to conservation.
With regards to the product being of a high quality, a certain exclusivity of the
product is achieved by the primacy that is given to conservation. By focusing on
conservation, the preservation of the natural environment and scenic beauty is
ensured. The result is that the product offered is of a high-quality. This is
enhanced by having a maximum of 20 people per site as well as the theoretic
idea that there is one person surrounded by a thousand hectares as suggested by
the 1-bed-per-1000 ha limitation.
The price of a visit to Wolwedans is neither cheap nor moderate but blatantly
expensive. The higher the price, the fewer people are required to generate the
same amount of revenue, the lower the environmental impact on the reserve.
This only serves to further contribute to the exclusive nature of the product.
The price also has an effect on the brand. The effect is that visitors have a sense
that they are making a contribution to conservation. This is attributed to the
‘story’ surrounding Wolwedans. Every brand benefits from being associated with
a ‘story’ and the Wolwedans story is enhanced by the name itself which means
the dance of wolves; by the assurance that a certain magic of un-spoilt nature is
still ‘out there’; by the mystique of the fairy circles and by the integral
importance of community to the organization. The last point is ever-present to
guests; the staff component is comprised of people from diverse cultures who
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 72
are confident and who interact with guests and one-another with ease. Despite
the development of effective marketing tools such as a story, however, marketing
has been identified in interviews, as an area where Wolwedans could benefit
from improvement. It is anticipated that tourist sites will increasingly be
selected for being green. The Zeitz Foundation envisions that GER certified sites,
known as Long Run Destinations will be sought out via their website and so
provide Wolwedans with an additional branding and marketing avenue.
The commercial ventures of the organization at large include the various
concessionaires, NICE, Vocational Training such as the Desert Academy, and the
Adopt-a-Fairy-Circle initiative. An important aspect of these ventures, especially
NICE and the vocational training, is the recognition that community activities can
be commercially viable on their own. An extra example is that the planned
outsourcing of the laundry service will not only save money but benefit the
nearby community of Maltehöhe.
The lessons to be learnt from the Wolwedans approach to commerce are that
their contribution to sustainability and conservation are a useful tool in
branding. The fundamental belief fueling much of the critical decisions at
Wolwedans, as well as the premise that the Zeitz Foundation is based upon is
that there is a growing trend towards ‘green travelling’ whereby tourism
destinations are consciously selected on the basis of the dedication of
destinations to conservation and sustainable development (which includes
cultural and community aspects). The success of the commercial aspect of the
organization can be attributed to two main points of focus that are transferable
to other sites. Firstly, superbly accurate budgets using budgeting software
enables informed planning. Secondly, cash flow management is crucial to
manage the seasonality within the tourism industry and development phases.
3. Community
The aim that the GER certification seeks to achieve in the incorporation of the
community facet of the pyramid is sustainable livelihoods. This is articulated as
three fundamental responsibilities: Livelihood benefits to individuals and
relevant communities must be attained; Two-way interaction must be sustained;
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 73
Fair working conditions must be established. However, the Wolwedans initiative
has far loftier and farther-reaching aims than those required by the proposed
outcomes as per the E4C-plan. Wolwedans is a comparatively excellent employer
in Namibia providing medical aid and pension benefits to all employees. The
ways in which Wolwedans go beyond the call of duty in the development of their
community can be understood firstly in terms of the social context of Namibia as
a developing country, secondly in terms of a wholly holistic approach.
As to the first, in the developing world, poverty and alcohol abuse are real
concerns. There is genuine care from the top down for the private life of all staff
beyond mere organizational aspects. There is a culture of going beyond the call
of duty to effect genuine empowerment of all employees but also of the larger
Namibian population.
Empowerment of the employees is focused on effective change from a culture of
apathy to purpose-driven and autonomous people who are aware of their own
capacity to affect change in their own lives. For the advancement of a culture of
personal development, sport and especially soccer has been found to be
effective. Sport is strongly advocated by the Zeitz Foundation as a contribution to
the community component and is viewed by the Wolwedans team as a means of
promoting happy, fit and more productive staff.
Staff happiness arose time and again as a key theme in the success of
Wolwedans. There is a recognition by staff that from the top down, nothing is too
much trouble, and that management is willing to go the extra mile (King,
Interview 6). Conversely there is a recognition by management that although
“happiness is to a large extent the paycheck, [...] there is seriously more to
happiness.” It is all-about-the-people as the team is seen as “the company’s most
valuable asset and as such the only one which will increase its value over the
years” (Brückner, 2000). This is evidenced in that the Village provides staff with
a space of their own where increasingly each employee has their own room.
SME’s that staff are interested in are encouraged by management even when
there is no direct benefit for Wolwedans (Brückner, Interview 10). The result of
employees who are assured that they are cared for is a relaxed, friendly and
hospitable environment (Webber, Interview 7) which has a direct influence on
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 74
guests’ experience. Two-way interaction is maintained not only in that staff are
encouraged to propose their own initiatives to management and voice their
concerns but that they are also encouraged to interact with the guests. This
further enhances the guest experience and cultural exchange which is discussed
below.
As to the second way in which the activities of Wolwedans go beyond the call of
duty, they are set on approaching all activities from a holistic point of view. The
holistic approach means that a wider range of communities and people benefit
from the activities and that the all activities are approached with a view to their
long-term effects. The vision goes beyond the responsibility to care for staff to
the effective empowerment of staff. It further goes beyond the staff and the
immediate community component to the tourism industry as a whole, and even
to the conservation of the entire country and the empowerment of all Namibians.
This is because of the paradoxical recognition that far from diluting their
competitive edge, making a contribution to the industry at large and to all
Namibians makes Namibia a more attractive tourist destination and a better
place to live. This translates into commercial benefits for the business. To this
end, Wolwedans employs only Namibians and provides varieties of vocational
training opportunities to transfer skills.
Lessons to be learnt from the Wolwedans approach to community are a holistic
perspective where affective empowerment is an achievable goal. The
commitment to the community is shown by the pledge of a third of the revenue
of Wolwedans to the Wolwedans Foundation aimed at socio-economic
development projects. This is a valuable transferable tool for the focused
commitment to Community.
4. Culture
The goal of the Zeitz Foundation with regards to the cultural facet of the E4C
plan is cultural creativity and diversity. The implication is that outcomes must
include an understanding of the cultural environment; that a cultural platform
must be sustained; and that the cultures of the local community, Wolwedans
itself and of visitors must be represented (Zeitz Foundation, 2010a).
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 75
Wolwedans promotes intercultural understanding and relations both through
cultural exchange and by emphasizing authenticity. With thirteen different
indigenous Namibian races, the staff component represents many diverse
cultures. As a result, the village is a cultural microcosm that promotes cultural
exchange between these races. The guests provide further opportunity for
cultural exchange. Since discussions with the Zeitz Foundation, Wolwedans have
given extra attention to culture as a separate component to the community
component already focused on. Cultural heritage has always been promoted
through the demarcated wilderness areas where there are bushmen artifacts to
be found. Similarly, expressions of culture have been promoted by the
presentation of the menu at dinnertime in the local, clicking Nama language as
well as the crafts that are for sale at the curio shop. New directives are to
promote social cohesion through soccer but also to invite guests to join in the
game to promote cultural exchange. There is also a planned bar, cinema and
library and the NRNR are investigating the commercialization of medicinal
plants.
Thus, Culture is a fledgling concern at Wolwedans but already an ethic of
authenticity and cultural exchange has been established. Authenticity is
emphasised in that the presentation of the menu in the Nama language has
always been optional and all staff are encouraged to interact with guests at their
own discretion about their own perspective. This also advances cultural
exchange as it adds to the feeling of autonomy and empowerment of staff and
enhances the guest experience.
5. The E4C Structure
The E4C-Plan is structured in such a way that it does not require adherence to
strict, fixed criteria but rather is innovative in that it recognizes that true
sustainable development is an ongoing goal. For this reason the plan is adaptive
and can be employed as a useful management tool. A management tool of this
nature instills a culture of strategic thinking, a long-term focus, and a more
holistic approach. A spin-off for the Zeitz Foundation is that it allows them to
develop assessment criteria that are appropriate to the specific sites and that are
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 76
more relevant than they would otherwise be. This strikes an appropriate balance
between the need to codify high-level concepts into measurable criteria on the
one hand and a recognition that sustainable development is an ongoing process
where qualitative measures evolve over time.
From the very beginning of the organization, Wolwedans has been concerned
with the development of the very values articulated by the 4C’s. This is evident in
all that has been demonstrated in this report and in the very fact of the selection
of Wolwedans by the Zeitz Foundation. Stephan articulated the goals of
Wolwedans as a commitment to “sustainable growth by carefully balancing
quality leadership, economic progress, social responsibility and care of [the]
environment” before becoming acquainted with the 4C’s. Thus, although the
goals were already well established they were largely dependent on a single
visionary leader for their advocacy and enforcement. In order to give these aims
longevity to successive leadership teams, the GER certification has been
considered and pursued as a means of cementing the Wolwedans Way.
6. The Wolwedans ‘Movement
The result of all the lessons to be learnt from Wolwedans is that there is a vision
and a sense of purpose so expansive that a movement has been created.
Involvement in the organization is not just a job, it is a lifestyle (Shongu,
Interview 8). This is supported by a multitude of the factors explored in this case
study. Wolwedans does not merely pay lip service to the values it claims to
support; its aims are reflected in the very structure of the organization.
Autonomy is emphasized in the leadership style of the organization which
further facilitates trust in the organization. The effect is true empowerment of
the cultural capital of the company which is not only highly prized by highly
invested in.
The long-term approach pervades the entire system and consideration thereof
precedes all important decisions. The vision includes certain non-negotiable
norms which underscores the passion that drives the organization and that is not
for sale as evidenced by Stephan himself: “ The aim is not to make allot of money,
but rather to create real value” (Brückner, Interview 4).
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 77
VII. FUTURE RESEARCH
This study examined the management practices and other contextual factors that
helped shape the sustainable development of Wolwedans and the potential
impact the GER certification and the adaptive management strategy it postulates
hold for Wolwedans.
A number of avenues for future research became apparent during this study.
Firstly, there exists the opportunity for longitudinal studies investigating
Wolwedans and their management practices after the transient phase of
adjusting to the use of the E4C-plan has passed. This would provide a better
understanding of the usefulness of adaptive management strategies as part of
sustainable development certification schemes and its efficacy in promoting
more sustainable practices.
Secondly, an immediate option exists to conduct similar case studies on the other
nine sites targeted by the Zeitz Foundation. Providing collective case study
material would allow for comparative analysis between the findings of each case.
Moreover, correlating the various contextual and managerial factors that
positively influence the willingness of a site to delve into sustainable
development initiatives may be of utmost value in developing better strategies
for the promotion of sustainability globally.
Thirdly, research analysis of the leadership and other managerial factors that are
in strongest support of sustainable development initiatives and how these
factors correlate with the leading certification programs globally, could prove
insightful. If any certification hopes to promote sustainable development and the
sustainable utilization of the limited resources available to mankind, it must
address not only the outcomes of the activities of a business, but also focus on
the drivers that ultimately define those activities in the first place. As this study
has already shown, leadership as well as strategic and holistic long-term
approaches are critical in shaping an organization and its activities. Further
research may do well by investigating these drivers.
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 78
VIII. BIBLIOGRAPHY
Agyeman, J., & Evans, T. (2003). Toward sustainability in urban communities:
Building equal rights with sustainable solutions. Annals of the American
Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 590, 35–53
Brückner, S. (2000). Our Vision, Goals, and Objectives. Retrieved October 6, 2010,
from Wolwedans.
Crabtree, A., O'Reilly, P., & Worboys, G. (2002). Sharing expertise in ecotourism
certification: Developing an International Ecotourism Standard. In World
Ecotourism Summit, Quebec.
Hunter, C. (1997). Sustainable Tourism as an adaptive paradigm. Annals of
Tourism Research, 24(4), 850-867.
Honey, M. and Stewart, E. (2002a) The evolution of 'green' standards for tourism.
In M. Honey (ed.) Ecotourism and Certification (pp. 33-71). Washington,
DC: Island.
Honey, M. and Stewart, E. (2002b) Introduction. In M. Honey (ed.) Ecotourism
and Certification (pp. 1-29). Washington, DC: Island.
Remer, L. (2008) Etosha National Park, Namibia in Nasa Earth Observatory at
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=3941 [2 September
2010]
http://haroldgoodwin.blogware.com/blog/_archives/2010/2/4/4446887.html
[2 September 2010]
http://haroldgoodwin.blogware.com/blog/_archives/2010/4/11/4502727.html
[2 September 2010]
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 79
http://www.sustainabletourismcriteria.org/index.php [1 September 2010]
http://www.sustainabletourismcriteria.org/index.php?option=com_content&tas
k=view&id=266&Itemid=483 [1 September 2010]
http://www.wolwedans-namibia.com/history.htm [3 September 2010]
http://www.wolwedans-namibia.com/resource_management.htm [3 September
2010]
http://www.zeitzfoundation.org/ [3 September 2010]
Gray, P. A., & Davidson, R. J. (2000). An Ecosystem Approach to Management: A
Context for Wilderness Protection The Concept of an Ecosystem Approach
to Management. USDA Forest Service Proceedings, 2(15), 59-64.
Klemmer, B. (2010). Long Run Destinations and the Global Ecosphere Retreat
Certification. Zeitz Foundation.
Landorf, C. (2009). Managing for sustainable tourism: a review of six cultural
World Heritage Sites. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 17(1), 53-70.
Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod J. E. (2009). Practical Research: Planning and design.
Pearson Education International, New Jersey, 9th edition.
Medina, L. K. (2005). Ecotourism and Certification: Confronting the principles
and pragmatics of socially responsible tourism. Journal of Sustainable
Tourism, 13(3), 281-295.
Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. New York: Free
Press.
(2000) Mohonk Agreement: Proposal for an International Certification Program
for Sustainable Tourism and Ecotourism. Available from:
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 80
http://www.rainforest-alliance.org/tourism/documents/mohonk.pdf [1
September 2010]
NamibRand Nature Reserve. (2007). Environmental Management Plan. Dated
January 2007. Retrieved October 6, 2010, from NamibRand Nature
Reserve.
NamibRand Nature Reserve. (2008). Tourism and Economic Development Plan.
Dated 14 November 2008. Retrieved October 6, 2010, from NamibRand
Nature Reserve.
NamibRand Nature Reserve. (2008). Zonation Plan. Dated 15 October 2008.
Retrieved October 6, 2010, from NamibRand Nature Reserve.
NamibRand Nature Reserve. (2009). Conservation & economic lessons learned
from managing the NamibRand Nature Reserve. Dated 31 August 2009.
Retrieved October 6, 2010, from NamibRand Nature Reserve.
NamibRand Nature Reserve. (2010), NamibRand Nature Reserve – A private
conservation initiative in south-western Namibia. Brochure. Retrieved
October 14, 2010, from Wolwedans.
NamibRand Safaris. (2010), The Wolwedans Collection. Brochure. Retrieved
October 14, 2010, from Wolwedans.
Newton, J. L., & Freyfogle, E. T. (2005). Sustainability: a Dissent. Conservation
Biology, 19(1), 23-32.
Nghifitikeko, C. P. (2010). An investigation to determine at which level of the
Namibian EcoAwards Wolwedans is and to test some practical suggestions
of ways to improve their EcoAward status. BTech Report. Polytechnic of
Namibia. Retrieved October 6, 2010, from Namib Rand Safaris (Pty) Ltd.
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 81
Odendal, N., Shaw, D., Scott, A., & Scott, M. (2010). NamibRand Nature Reserve
Annual Management Report: March 2009 – February 2010. Retrieved
October 6, 2010, from NamibRand Nature Reserve.
Sarukhán, J., & Whyte, A. (2005). Living beyond our means: Natural assets and
human well-being. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Statement of the
MA Board. Available from:
http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/BoardStatement.aspx [2
September 2010]
UNESCO. (2010). Tomorrow Today: Learning to build a sustainable future.
MediaPack 2010. Tudor Rose. Available from:
http://www.unesco.org/en/esd/ [2 September 2010
Wolwedans Foundation. (2010). Wolwedans Desert Academy “The Living
Classroom”. Final NQA Proposal. Retrieved October 18, 2010, from Namib
Rand Safaris (Pty) Ltd.
World Commission on Environment and Development, Brundtland, G.H., &
Khalid, M. (1987). Brundtland Commission (WCED) report: Our common
future. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications,
California, 2nd edition.
Zeitz Foundation. (2010a). Global Ecosphere Retreat Certification for Long Run
Destinations: How to develop an E4C‐Plan for self‐assessment ‐ Help Manual.
Zeitz Foundation.
Zeitz Foundation. (2010b). The Long Run: GER Facts Sheet. Zeitz Foundation.
Copyright UCT
MBA Research Report December 2010 82
IX. APPENDICES
Appendix 1: Formal Interviewees
Interviewee # Date Organization
Brückner, S Interview 1 October 6, 2010 Wolwedans HQ
Dobson, G Interview 2 October 6, 2010 Wolwedans HQ
Odendal, N Interview 3 October 7, 2010 NamibRand Nature Reserve
Brückner, S Interview 4 October 11,
2010
Wolwedans HQ
Dobson, G Interview 5 October 12,
2010
Wolwedans HQ
King, A Interview 6 October 12,
2010
Wolwedans HQ
Webber, E Interview 7 October 13,
2010
Wolwedans
Shongu, T Interview 8 October 13,
2010
Wolwedans
Nel, T Interview 9 October 15,
2010
Wolwedans HQ
Brückner, S Interview
10
October 15,
2010
Wolwedans HQ
Klemmer, B Interview
11
October 1, 2010 Zeitz Foundation
top related