conservation agriculture in africa
Post on 14-Apr-2017
368 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Conservation Agriculture in Africa
by Rachid MRABET, PhD
Research Leader National Institute for Agricultural Research - Morocco
Representative African Conservation Tillage Network (ACT)
Email: mrabet@inra.org.ma
for presentation at the
AfricaCarbon Forum
Marrakech June 4th to 6th 2011
Contents
• Challenges facing farming in Africa
• CA principles
• CA wordwide & drivers
• CA practices in Africa
• CA and Carbon
• About ACT
• ACT Projects
• ACT Achievements
• ACT Challenges
• Conclusions
Dilema for African Agriculture:
• Alleviating poverty
• Sustainable development
• Food security
• Energy security
• Improvement of environmental quality
Major Farming Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa (Dixon et al., 2001)
System % of
land
% of
pop Principal livelihood Incidence
poverty
Poverty
reduced
Agric.
growth
1 Irrigated 1 3 Rice, veget, livestock Low Low High
2 Tree crop 3 7 Tuber, cash treecrop Low/Mod High Modhigh
3 Forest-based 11 7 Tubers, forest gath. Severe Low Lowmod
4 Rice/tree 1 2 Banana coffee rice Moderate Low Low
5 Highl. perennial 1 8 Ensete, wheat, livest, # Very sev. High Low
6 Highl. temperate 2 8 Wheat, barley, leg, livest# Moderate Moder. Lowmod
7 Rootcrop 12 12 Yam, legumes, veget. Lowmod Moder. Moder.
8 Cereal-Rootcrop 13 15 Maize,sorghum,cassava
Yam, livest, #
Low Low High
9 Maize mixed 10 16 Maize, cassava, cattle, $ Moderate High Modhigh
10 Large commerc. 5 5 Cereals, leg., livestock Low Low Moder.
11 Agropast./grains 8 9 Millet, sorghum, livest. $ Severe High Lowmod
12 Pastoral 14 7 Livestock, remittances Severe Low Low
13 Sparse (arid) 18 2 Livestock, remittances Severe Low Low
14 Coastal fishing 2 3 Artis.fish. cocon, cashew Moderate Low Lowmod
# Also off-farm activities; $ also remittances
Major Farming Systems of Middle East and North Africa (Dixon et al., 2001)
* Incidence of poverty for small farmers/herdsmen
System % of
land
% of
pop Principal livelihood Incidence
poverty *
Poverty
reduced
Agric.
growth
1 Irrigated 2 19 Fruits, veget, cashcrop Moderate High High
2 Highland mixed 7 32 Cereals, legume, sheep Extensive Moder. High
3 Rainfed mixed 2 19 Treecrops, cereals, leg. Moderate High High
4 Dryland mixed 4 15 Cereals, sheep, remitt. Extensive Moder. Moder.
5 Pastoral 23 10 Sheep, goats, barley Extensive Moder. Low
6 Sparse (arid) 62 5 Camels, sheep Low Low Low
7 Coastal artisanal
fishing
Negl. little Livestock, remittances Moderate Low Low
8 Urban-based Negl. little Horticulture, poultry Low Low Low
Challenges facing Africa
The African farmers largely depend on farming (crop-livestock) for their livelihood.
Their efforts are undermined by:
1. Land degradation – low OM, soil infertility, erosion, hardpans-continuous cultural tillage;
2. Climate change – particularly erratic rainfall and evapo-transpiration in excess of annual rainfall;
3. Diseases and farm labour shortage – on animal and human;
4. Inaccessibility/affordability of farm equipment and inputs;
5. Agriculture and storm runoff is jeopardizing water quality
Mean size (ha)
% < 2 ha
Sub-Saharan Africa 2.4 69
South Asia 1.4 78
East Asia 1.0 79
SE Asia 1.8 57
West Asia North Africa 4.9 65
Central America 10.7 63
South America 111.7 36
Europe 32.3 30
USA 178.4 4
Vast Majority of World’s Farmers are Small and Family Operated
Source: Eastwood et al., 2009
therefore:
tillage is incompatible with sustainable agriculture!
introduction
Tillage scenario:
degradation/ erosion
> natural
soil formation
= NOT
sustainable
can a further promotion of tillage based agriculture still be justified?
Animal traction systems (Zambia):
Mouldboard plowing followed by harrowing and seeding with the hoe
Workload: 100km/ha
Hand-hoe-system (Malawi):
Workload: 140,000 hoe strokes/ha/yr
Traditional seeding systems
Soil organic carbon and yield indicators over 100 years of cultivation in western Kenya
From Marenya & Barrett 2007
Hence…
• The world must move from polluting and degrading technologies to sustainable technologies.
• Soil Carbon is a Critical Component for Environmental Quality and agricultural sustainability === Carbon management technologies
FAO definition: www.fao.org/ag/ca
Conservation Agriculture (CA) is an approach to managing agro-ecosystems for
improved and sustained productivity, increased profits
and food security while preserving and enhancing the
resource base and the environment.
Greening agricultural production in Africa
100
Dustbowl
1930 2000 1950
US
Soil
Co
nse
rvat
ion
Se
rvic
e
con
serv
atio
n t
illag
e
du
stb
ow
l Si
be
ria/
USS
R
Fau
lkn
er (
US)
– F
uku
oka
(Ja
pan
)
com
me
rcia
l no
-till
/US
firs
t n
o-t
ill d
em
on
stra
tio
n in
Bra
zil
Old
riev
e/Zi
mb
abw
e
ado
pti
on
Bra
zil
pla
nti
o d
ire
to n
a p
alh
a
exp
eri
men
ts in
Ch
ina,
Ind
oga
nge
tic
Pla
ins
Ne
w b
oo
st: C
anad
a, A
ust
ralia
, Kaz
akh
stan
, R
uss
ia, C
hin
a, F
inla
nd
...;
Afr
ica
Arg
en
tin
a, P
arag
uay
;
1980 1990
Firs
t n
o-t
ill in
th
e U
S IITA
no
-till
re
sear
ch
50
Mill
. ha
CA adoption
1970
USA 26.5
Canada 13.5
Australia 17
Europe 1
Kazakhstan 1
Africa 0.5
Brazil 26
Conservation Agriculture 117 Million ha
Argentina 26
Paraguay 2.5
China 1
tropical savannah
continental, dry
temperate, moist
temperate, moist
continental, dry
irrigated
smallholder
smallholder
smallholder
arid
arid large scale
large scale
large scale
large scale
large scale
large scale
subtropical, dry
tropical savannah
other LA 2
>50%
<25%
>70%
up to 90%
Conservation agriculture motion
Drivers for CA adoption: • Erosion North America, Brazil,
China, Africa
• Drought: China, Australia,
Kazakhstan, Maghreb, Sub Saharan Africa
• Cost of production: everywhere
CA globally
Solution to the Problem:
• Conservation agriculture following three principles:
– Minimum soil disturbance
– Crop residue retention
– Crop rotations and green manure cover crops
What equipment for minimum soil disturbance?
Start with what farmers have or can afford
Jab planter
Oxen ripping Oxen direct seeding
Tractor mounted seeder Highly mechanized The hand hoe – for basins
making The Dibble stick
How to Achieve Permanent Soil Cover?
• Mixed cropping – with relayed and/or slow growing cover crops or shrubs
• Purposeful crop residue retention
• Zero or controlled grazing
• Cover crops non-edible to livestock
East Africa
West Africa
Trees and shrubs – for soil cover and fertility
Piliostigma – cut before planting
Faidherbia albida – shade and dropped leaves
CA with Trees potential:
• Food security via increased productivity
• Adaptation to climate change
• Carbon sequestration – below & above ground – Zero cost nitrates – 120 kg
N/ha/year
– Micro climate
– Forest products
Ca in Africa July-08 25
CA, a complex & systemic innovation (process)
Multiple
products
Grains
Forrages
Mulch
On-farm
consumption
Soil fertility
build-up
Off-farm effects
Whole-farm effects
Labou
r
Equipment
Inputs
Animal power
Learning & adaptation over time
Innovation system
Credits
Service & Input
Providers
Markets
Policies
C
O
N
S
E
R
V
A
T
I
O
N
A
G
R
I
C
U
L
T
U
R
E
Organisations
Partnerships Policies
Industries/Technologies
R&D Training
CA
Capacity Building
Financing
Knowledge Management
Benefits of Conservation agriculture
Increased water infiltration Reduced moisture evaporation Less water run-off and soil
erosion Reduction in labour and energy
use Reduction in production costs* Increases in soil organic
matter* Increases in nutrient
availability* Greater biological pest control*
Cumulative infiltration over time, Monze FTC, Zambia, March 2006
Time (min)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Infiltra
tio
n m
m h
-1
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Conventional farmers practice
Basin planting
Direct seeding
Conservation Agriculture
Mechanical Tillage
Biological Tillage
Action of Soil Biota
Structure/Porosity
Conventional A
griculture
High Soil
Organic
Matter
low soil
organic matter
Soil Organic Matter = Drought Resistance
2 CO
- increased water holding capacity and use efficiency
- increased cation exchange capacity
- reduced soil erosion
- improved water quality
- improved infiltration, less runoff
- decreased soil compaction
- improved soil tilth and structure
- reduced air pollution
- reduced fertilizer inputs - increased soil buffer capacity
- increased biological activity - increased nutrient cycling and storage
- increased diversity of microflora
- increased adsorption of pesticides
- gives soil aesthetic appeal
- increased capacity to handle manure and other wastes
- more wildlife
Carbon central hub of environmental quality.
C
Environmental benefits are spokes that emanate from the Carbon hub of the “Environmental
Sustainability wheel.”
The demand for CA in Africa – as a result of either on-farm validation of its benefits and/or its role in
achieving food security, alleviating poverty or climate change adaptation and mitigation –
continued to rise.
is heavily acting in this …
African Conservation Tillage Network
• In 1998, the Zimbabwe farmers Union (ZFU), the German development co-operation (GTZ), the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the Agricultural Research Council (ARC) of South Africa and a number other organizations jointly decided on initiation of ACT.
• It is an international association which promotes sharing of information among those involved in conservation tillage farming in Africa to increase yield and income.
• ACT was initially commissioned with a geographical focus on Southern, Central and East Africa (approximately along the SADC and EAC boundaries). However, the Network has spontaneously expanded responding to active interest from rest of the continent : West and North Africa.
Scaling Up CA in Africa
The African Conservation Tillage Network (ACT)
Core Functions = One Stop Information Support Facility =
Knowledge memory “bank”
ACT promotes and facilitates sharing of information and experiences on conservation farming principles and practices in Africa.
CA appraisal & identification of knowledge gaps
Stimulate and facilitate strategic thinking on CA
CA Promotion, lobbying and advocacy
CA Training and training support
ACT Governance • ACT’s organizational and management structure has been
established on governance principles of transparency, accountability, legitimacy and consultative decision making processes.
• ACT is a fast growing pan-African not-for-profit organization whose membership is voluntary and aims at bringing together stakeholders and players who are dedicated to improving agricultural productivity through sustainable utilization of natural resources of land and water in Africa’s farming systems and committed to the principal of mutual collaboration, partnership and sharing of information/knowledge on sustainable natural resources management and drawing on synergies and complementarities.
Over 2000 ACT individual Members and Institutions from 33 countries Worldwide
ACT Governance
CA knowledge and information sharing: web site : www.act-africa.org
Publications; Newsletters, Databases
Secretariat at the Nairobi headquarters, sub-regional offices (Dar es salaam, Harare, Ouaga), Board of Directors, Country Focal Persons/Institutions Working with partners through the Network
Ca in Africa July-08 35
ACT’s networking, knowledge and information platform
• Web-based www.act-africa.org o CA databases (equipment suppliers, CA professionals, …, )
with continental and global experience reference material o Info sheets series (11) o e-News letters
• Hard copy publications o 1500 Manuals o Posters o Brochures and leaflets
• CA case studies: 8 studies, 13,000 books
The Conservation Agriculture for Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development Project
CA-SARD Project
• It focused in contributing to the promotion of growth and improved food security in Kenya and Tanzania through the scaling up of conservation agriculture (CA) as a sustainable land management (SLM) option.
• It uses farmer field school (FFS) methodology as a tool for introducing the CA concept to smallholder farmers.
CA-SARD Project
• Implemented under the Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development (SARD) Initiative/umbrella
• Funded by the German Government through FAO trust fund
– Phase 1: 2004-2006
– Phase 2: July 2007 – 2010
• Implemented by FAO and the Ministries of Agriculture in Kenya (KARI) and Tanzania (SARI) and Brazil (IAPAR)
• Coordinated at regional level by the African Conservation Tillage Network (ACT)
• In E. Africa: Active in 10 Districts and some 5000 households (49% women) directly reached through 227 FFS
CA SARD Project Achievements
• 47% of targeted households have truly adopted CA (2 or all 3 principles) in 1,600 hectares.
• Higher yields
– From 3 tones/hectare in conventional to 6 t/ha for maize under CA)
– From 0-1 tone/ha for conventional in drought to 0-4 tones/ha under CA
• Marked improvement in food security and nutrition
• Less labor (up to 57%) in land preparation and weeding
• Freed up labour and cash used for better crop management and enterprise diversification (high value/year round agriculture: vegetables, dairy, poultry)
Some lessons from CA SARD
• It is possible to increase land productivity without too much emphasis on yields. – Innovative synchronization of cropping systems
(intercrops, relays, crop spacing) to raise 2-3 crops simultaneously instead of 1, reducing weeding labour.
• Innovative introduction of “cover crops” valued by the community as crops (e.g. pigeon peas, bananas) helps deter livestock and maintenance of soil cover.
• CA with external inputs is MORE PROFITABLE but also MORE RISKY
• Linkage of CA-SARD project with SCAP is mutually beneficial and greatly increases access to CA knowledge on a pan-African scale.
• Concerns West Africa (Burkina Faso, Guinea, Niger) financed by IFAD and AFD and implemented by ACT with ICRAF and CIRAD
The Smallholder Conservation Agriculture promotion Project SCAP
SCAP
IFAD LOAN PROJECTS PADER/BGN, PDRD, PICOFA PPILDA
Other partners : Public services, NARS, Universities,
Farmers’ groups, NGO etc.
innovative farmers; farmers’ groups; FFS groups
SCAP Implementation Arrangements
IFAD AFD
Scaling Up CA in Africa
Accomplishments of SCAP (2 cropping seasons only)
• 800 smallholder farmers in 28 villages and 31 FFS reached with CAWT and engaged in validation of the technology
• IFAD loan project partners, Ministries of Agriculture, INERA, CRS, SOS Sahel – BF, IFDC, Réseau MARP, Arfa are enticed and supporting development of CA with trees
• 5 MSc students have been engaged and working with smallholder farmers to solve real and burdening problems
CA2AFRICA • Conservation Agriculture in Africa: Analysing and FoReseeing its
impact – Comprehending its Adoption (CA2AFRICA)
o Objective to assess and learn jointly from past and on-going CA experiences under which conditions and to what extent CA strengthens the socio-economic position of landholders in Africa.
o The project funded by EU, has 10 partners (including ACT) led by CIRAD, is for 2 years from March 2010
o Operates in 5 platforms: Southern; Eastern; Western and North Africa, Madagascar.
www.CA2AFRICA.eu
Conservation Agriculture with Trees (CAWT) Project
o Conservation Agriculture with Trees (CAWT)– establishing the status quo and setting the regional stage for scaling up: o funded by SIDA for 2011; o case studies from Tanzania, Kenya, Zambia and Ghana.
o Implementation is led by ICRAF and ACT is a partner.
The Agro-ecology based aggradation-conservation agriculture (ABACO)
• Targeting innovations to combat soil degradation and food insecurity in semi-arid Africa.
• A 4 year project for semiarid areas of East (Kenya, Tanzania), West (Mali, Burkina Faso) and Southern (Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Madagascar) Africa started in Jan 2011.
• The project is funded by the EU and is composed of 9 partners led by ACT.
• Partners are : CIRAD, NRI (UK), Yellow Window (Belgium), Wageningen University, University of Zimbabwe (SOFESCA), EMBRAPA (Brazil), Madagascar and CIRDES (Burkina Faso).
BioCarbon Fund Projects in SSA
• Combating rural poverty and stabilizing rural economies are among the biggest challenges facing developing countries. By expanding markets for emission reductions in agriculture, forestry, and other land uses, there will be an unprecedented opportunity for poor small-holder farmers all over the developing world.
• ACT and Wildlife conservation Society (WCS), will execute the Monitoring Carbon, Environmental and Socio-Economic Co-Benefits of BioCF Projects in SSA – In Niger, Ethiopia, Kenya, Uganda, DRC Congo and Madagascar
projects. – Funded by the GEF and implemented by the World Bank.
www.biocarbonfund.org
47
New Thrust
1. Update and broaden ACT role and membership, farmer networks, etc.
2. Consolidate Knowledge and Information Management Platform
3. Emphasis on building-up local human capital. Empower farmers in own on-farm experimentation, monitoring, evaluation and learning.
4. Lobby Governments, Institutions and Donor support for CA
5. Medium to long term interventions
THANK YOU
www.act-africa.org
top related